Sie sind auf Seite 1von 89

THE DEVELOPMENT OF ANALYTICAL, COMMUNICATION AND

RESEARCH SKILLS IN ACCOUNTING EDUCATION:


PERCEPTIONS OF DE LA SALLE UNIVERSITY
ACCOUNTANCY STUDENTS AND
FACULTY MEMBERS

A Research Paper
Presented to the Marketing Department
De La Salle University

In partial fulfillment
of the course requirements
in Philosophy of Science and Scientific Methods

Submitted to:
Mr. Manuel Alfredo de Leon, MAC

Submitted by:

Mc Reynald Banderlipe II
Cynthia Castillo
Christian Navarro
Carlos Nemenzo, Jr.
Allouraine Sabiniano

April 5, 2005
ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The researchers would like to give its warmest gratitude to the following people

who have helped and inspired us to complete this paper:

We would like to thank Mr. Manuel Alfredo de Leon for the wisdom that he has

shared to us which allowed us to transform this paper into a more scholarly output.

We are indebted to the De La Salle University (DLSU) Accountancy

Department, for being our “home,” during the term, especially to its faculty and staff for

the support and patience they have shown us.

We give our sincerest appreciation to all our respondents, the DLSU

Accountancy students and faculty members of and PRACTITIONERS, for their

cooperation and participation in both our focus group discussions which allowed us to

gain new perspectives on the improvement of our research paper and in responding to our

survey questionnaires for which this paper would never have been completed.

We thank our families and friends for the continued inspiration despite the

minimum quality time spent with them for the duration of this research.

We dedicate this paper to all of you who believe that the skills discussed in this

paper should be integrated in accounting education to achieve a quality Accountancy

Education.

Most of all, we thank our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, for giving us the

wisdom and perseverance to finish this paper despite our busy working schedules. We

offer to you this humble work inspired by Your love and guidance.
ABSTRACT

With the complexity of today’s business transactions, accountants are continuously

challenged to cope with the changes to survive in the profession. Such changes require

academic institutions to emphasize the development of knowledge and skills among

accountancy students.

This paper focuses on the development of three skills: analytical, communication, and

research skills in the accountancy education as perceived by Accountancy students and

faculty members. Using the data from the surveys gathered from accountancy students

and faculty members of De La Salle University, results show that all problem solving,

evaluating and interpreting financial data/systems, business cases, and design of

theoretical questions discouraging memorization are perceived by students to be highly

significant to the general development of analytical skills. On the other hand, faculty

members only perceive business cases, evaluating financial systems, and design of

theoretical questions to be significant in the analytical skill development. Despite this

result, both students and faculty agree that problem solving is the number one factor in

the development of the skill, while on-the-job training is considered to be the least factor.

In terms of communication skills, students perceive all areas such as oral

communication, written communication, non-verbal communication, and listening skills,

with the exception of essay writing, to be highly significant with the general evaluation of

communication skills. Faculty members, on the other hand, perceive writing essays,

debates, and graded recitation to be highly significant factors in the development of the
skill. It was also found out that preparing written reports is the number one sub-skill that

develops the communication skills, as evidenced by high mean scores.

For research skills, all factors such as awareness on plagiarism, reference to other

school materials, basic and applied research, taking research methodology courses and

other related subskills are highly significant as perceived by students. Faculty members

perceive only preparing basic and applied research, feasibility and industry studies, and

formal course on research methods to be the highly significant factor in the development

of research skills. It also noted that awareness on plagiarism and reference to other school

materials are the main factors in the development of the skill, as perceived by students

and faculty members, respectively.

Students perceive Mandatory CPE programs to be helpful in the development of ACR

skills, whereas faculty members do not. While the notion that the development of ACR

skills is developed more through experience than classroom learning are not highly

significant to both faculty and students, students placed high significance on DLSU’s

participation in the development of the skill in contrast with the faculty perceptions. At

the end of the paper, conflicting opinions as to why the development of ACR skills is

hampered in accounting education are presented.

Future research for this study should be geared towards formulation of policies and

programs toward the development of ACR skills, increasing the geographical scope of

the study, the consideration and assessment of other skills necessary in the accountancy

profession.
LIST OF TABLES

TABLE NUMBER PAGE

1 Sample Size Allocation among the Different Year Levels of 46


BSA students in De La Salle University

2 Demographics of Respondent Accountancy Students 52

3 Demographics of Respondent Accountancy Teachers 53

4 Mean Responses of Students and Teachers on General 55


Evaluation of ACR Skill

5 Spearman Correlation Coefficients for Analytical Skills with 57


Mean Responses by Students and Teachers

6 Spearman Correlation Coefficients for Communication Skills 59


with Mean Responses by Students and Teachers

7 Spearman Correlation Coefficients for Research Skills with 62


Mean Responses by Students and Teachers

8 Spearman Rank Correlation of General Evaluation Statements 64


Correlated with Mandatory Continuing Professional Education
(CPE) and the Mean Responses by Students and Teachers

9 Spearman Rank Correlation of General Evaluation Statements 65


Correlated with the Notion that ACR Skills are Developed
More Through Experience and the Mean Responses by
Students and Teachers

10 Spearman Rank Correlation of General Evaluation Statements 66


Correlated with the Opinion that De La Salle University,
specifically the Accountancy Department helps develop the
ACR skills of Accountancy Students and the Mean Responses
by Students and Teachers

11 Students Opinion on Reasons of Underdevelopment of ACR 68


Skills of Accountancy Students

12 Teachers Opinion on Reasons of Underdevelopment of ACR 69


Skills of Accountancy Students,

13 Students and Teachers Ranking of ACR Skills According to 71


Importance
LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE NUMBER PAGE

1 Conceptual Framework 43

2 Operational Framework 44
LIST OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX

A Focused Group Discussion Guide Questions for Students,


Teachers, and Practitioners

B Survey Questionnaire
CHAPTER 1

BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

1.1 INTRODUCTION

While businesses evolve with more complexity in systems and processes, accountants

are being challenged by change and competition. Changes are happening at an ever-

increasing pace and accountants need to cope with them to survive in the profession.

Being outdated may cause accountants to be easily engulfed by competition.

As the accounting profession is being revolutionized, many professionals are thrown

into a storm of confusion. Although professionals seem to be perplexed, students are

more beleaguered and victimized by the current changes as they prepare to enter the

accountancy profession. These changes resulting from the harmonization of accounting

standards appear to be discouraging and puzzling to the accountancy students.

Notwithstanding several researches on perceptions with regard to education quality

and effectiveness of teaching and learning, regulatory boards, business executives, and a

great part of the public are pushing to ground educational standards far more relevant to

the knowledge and skills needed to succeed in the new business model. Thus, new

challenges are identified in the efforts of institutions to improve the quality of education

(Mustafa & Chiang, 2006).


As educational institutions carry the burden of preparing students for the profession,

the challenges become more difficult because of the policies set by the Board of

Accountancy (BOA) and Commission on Higher Education (CHED). This is evidenced

by the ability of CHED to close down accountancy programs. This poses a challenge to

academic institutions in improving the accountancy program to emphasize the knowledge

and skills that should be developed by accountancy students.

In a CHED Memorandum on Revised Minimum Curricular Requirements for

Bachelor of Science in Accountancy (2006), it was emphasized that the accounting

education’s ultimate goal is to produce competent professionals capable of making

positive contributions to the society. The memorandum lists the knowledge and skills

necessary to become a competent and successful professional.

Several researches have supported the increased emphasis on the development of these

skills. In his article, Burnett (2003) suggested that the development of analytical or

critical thinking and communication skills should be pursued throughout the students’

stay in the university rather than incorporating it in a term or two as these skills are the

foundation of the all other skills. Burnett also emphasized the need for an accountancy

student to improve his research skills to better prepare him for his career.

This paper tackled the development of analytical, communication, and research skills

as perceived by DLSU Accountancy students and faculty members. This research was

conducted to determine if the three skills are integrated and developed in the academe
specifically by De La Salle University (DLSU). Two perceptions, of the students and of

the teachers, regarding the interaction of the significant skills and quality of accounting

education were examined.

Students from the Bachelor of Science in Accountancy (BSA) were selected as

respondents to determine whether they perceive themselves as having the skills necessary

to succeed in the profession. The Accountancy faculty members comprise the second set

of respondents as teachers are considered as one of the foundations of the accountancy

education.

Analytical skills are necessary in solving unstructured problems requiring judgments

and critical thinking. These skills may be developed in school through exposures in a

variety of business cases and practical application. Application of analytical skills will

prove to be important in processing complex business transactions in the work place.

Communication skills, on the other hand, involve the transmission and receipt of

information in a concise and effective manner. Such skills are critical in successful verbal

presentations and written assignments. In practice, communication skills are essential in

client relations, interaction with colleagues and dealings with government agencies.

Lastly, research skills involve the ability to organize efforts and logical thinking to

obtain and expand knowledge in solving problems (Edralin, 2002). These skills are best

developed in courses that allow students to utilize resources other than textbooks. In the
business world, said skills are crucial in corporate strategic planning, industry analysis,

financial performance studies, and other significant business related investigation.

1.2 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

Decline in the Quality of Accountancy Students

The recent scandals faced by the Accountancy profession has spurred a lot of

speculations on the proficiency of Certified Public Accountants (CPAs) in demonstrating

some skills required in the practice of the profession. Although training future CPAs has

been made easier due to advances in technology and the availability of modern learning

tools, there was still a perennial problem with regards to the skills being developed by the

students.

Studies showed that the accountancy profession has generally declined in quality and

employers have expressed dissatisfaction on the abilities of accounting graduates. In fact,

a fifteen-page study was co-authored by the CEOs of the former Big Eight accounting

firms in 1989 to express their concern on the quality and number of accounting graduates

available to the accounting profession (Madison, 1990; Fowler, 1989).

The Big Eight pointed out that the accountancy profession has expanded and thus has

become more complex. The diversification of services offered by accounting firms,

together with the expansion of these firms into the international market had set a higher

standard to succeed in the accountancy profession. Success in the practice of accounting


requires both skills and knowledge in public accounting gained through talents, pre-entry,

and continuing education (Madison, 1990).

Furthermore, faculty members perceive that the abilities of today’s accounting

students are weaker compared to prior years. In spite of this, higher grades were given to

these students, indicating that standards on accounting students were lowered (Morgan,

Sneed, & Swinney, 1999). This may be one of the reasons why practitioners complain on

the abilities of new hires despite their high GPAs (Pearson, 1995).

Improving the Quality of Accounting Education

Both practitioners and academicians are concerned with this decline in quality of

today’s accounting graduates. Practitioners suggested that the accounting curricula

should emphasize on developing interpersonal and analytical skills, as well as public

speaking abilities. Moreover, professional organizations recommended that instructors

incorporate cases, group projects, written assignments, oral reports and research projects

into their classes (Dow & Feldmann, 1994).

These findings were consistent with the study conducted by Larkin (1994)

rationalizing the need for students to develop communication and technical skills. Larkin

believes that these non-technical skills are “just as important as technical skills for

success in the business world” (p. 20). Despite this increased emphasis on non-technical

skills, students are still unable to appreciate the value that employers place on non-
technical skills. This was verified in the study conducted by Usoff and Feldmann in

1998.

The increased demand in improving the students’ skills does not mean a complete

change in the accounting curricula. Technical accounting topics should still be the focus

of accounting courses. Yet teaching methodologies should be revised to enhance the

students’ communication and interpersonal skills (Pearson, 1995).

This was contradicted by the study presented by Sneed and Morgan in 1999. The

study identified the accounting curriculum as the main factor of the weakness in

communication and problem-solving ability of the students. They suggested the redesign

of the curriculum to incorporate these skill areas and the continuous development of the

skill throughout the entire curriculum. In response to the increased requirements set by

the profession, several states in the U.S.A. implemented the 150-hour requirement, thus

extending the length of stay in the university by a year (Dresnack & Strieter, 2005).

Studies also showed that accounting education has shown signs of improvement. Both

practitioners and educators believe that a lot of progress in the accounting education has

been made by emphasizing active learning and skills development. Interviews with

known academicians in the United States showed that more ethics and fraud cases were

being taught. Increased attention was also placed in developing writing and oral skills, as

well as utilization of technological advances such as e-mail, spreadsheets, presentations

and video streaming (Myers, 2005).


Stone (2000) urged educators to revert back to the definition of accounting which, in a

way, defines the skills needed by the professionals who exercise them. These skills

include converting data into information, summarizing the information, distinguishing

relevant from irrelevant information, attesting to the reliability of the information, and

communicating information effectively.

Analytical Skills

Analytical skills pertain to the ability of a person in identifying and solving

unstructured problems in unfamiliar settings and exercising judgments based on the

comprehension of unfocused set of facts (Burnett, 2003). Schafersman (1991) defines

critical thinking as the “correct thinking in pursuit of relevant and reliable knowledge

around the world.” It embodies a reasonable, reflective, responsible, and skillful thinking

in order to ask appropriate questions, gather relevant information, efficiently sort the

information, reason logically from the information, and arrive to a reliable conclusion.

Analytical skills, particularly critical thinking skills, are as important as the other

skills, for critical thinking harnesses the ability to give light to problems of a

“nondeterministic” nature through identifying errors and irregularities which, in turn, aid

in making sound judgments (Jenkins, 1998).

The increased complexity of the business environment called for educators to develop

the students’ ability to deal creatively with multidimensional problems commonly

characterized by unstructured facts and uncertain solutions (Jones & Duncan, 1995).
Because critical thinking is based on information, Schafersman (1991) suggested that

critical thinking be taught during lectures, laboratory exercises, homeworks, quantitative

exercises, term papers, and exams where information can be processed in order to come

up with considerable judgment.

An effective way of developing the analytical skills needed in business is by

incorporating case analyses in the curriculum. Though the inclusion of cases, mostly in

Intermediate Accounting classes which is common in universities in the United States,

these cases have minor influence on the students’ grades. Studies showed that only 60%

do not incorporate any grade on cases when evaluating the students’ overall performance

(Dow & Feldmann, 1994).

In a study performed by Kealey, Holland, and Watson (2005), there was a significant

relationship between critical thinking and performance in a particular accounting subject,

which substantiates the need to develop the skill to reduce failure rates in class and to

gear students towards becoming future accounting professionals.

In 1999, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) stressed that

critical skills aid to conjoin information from various disciplines. There exists the need to

strategize approaches, to adopt the strength-weakness-opportunity-threat (SWOT)

analysis in dealing with business problems, to maximize the use of resources, to apply the

concepts learned in other scenarios, and to analyze information relevant for decision-

making. In a previous paper by AICPA (1997), it emphasized the use of the skill to be
directed towards the creation of measures and forms of assistance in helping businesses

improve their operations.

The development of analytical skills is highly related to the development of

communication skills, specifically writing. Though effective writing focuses on content,

it also involved compiling ideas, drafting outlines and analyzing the different aspects of

an issue. Thus, critical thinking should precede writing (Reinstein & Trebby, 1997).

Communication Skills

Communication skills involve both receiving and transmitting information and

concepts, including effective reading, listening, writing, and speaking (Burnett, 2003).

Additionally, the skills should not be limited to the understanding of the communication

theory, preparation of business correspondences, and the presentation of reports (Maupin

& May, 1993).

Several related studies suggest that communication skills should be an application of

the theory in emphasizing ideas, in observing good writing conventions (Danziger, 1997),

in organizing the flow of thought, the observance of the “7 C’s of Communication

(correctness, conciseness, clarity, completeness, concreteness, consideration, and

courtesy)”, the use of standard English, the awareness of the purpose of writing, and the

appropriateness of the writing for readers (May and Menelaides, 1993).


Communication skills play a very important role in the development of an accounting

professional. These skills are required of accountants to transfer information easily and

defend views to clients and peers (Reinstein & Trebby, 1997). However, recent studies

indicate that there is a problem with regard to the development of communication skills

of accounting students. This can be attributed to the inclusion of only one writing course

in the accounting curriculum and the naïve exposure of educators to different types of

writing activities by CPAs (Sriram and Coppage, 1992).

In a related study conducted by Hussain, Al-Darayseh, & D Ouville (1994), a large

chunk of firms are dissatisfied with the undergraduates because of oral-written

communication problems. In addition to this, the firms stressed the importance of

intensifying the accounting curriculum by integrating more oral-written communication

courses and information technology courses towards a more enhanced academic

preparation of the students. Others suggested the inclusion of a fifth year in the

accounting curricula to meet the needs of harnessing communication skills (Anonymous,

1982). Furthermore, Sutherland (2004) suggests the inclusion of exercising integrity in

communication, particularly in written communication, where plagiarism can be the last

resort for students who are not oriented to the best writing practices in the profession.

Reinstein and Trebby presented techniques in improving the students’ writing skills by

requiring them to submit term papers and cases. Term papers require students to resolve

an accounting issue with carefully researched arguments. Students were also required to

develop from the professors’ own experiences, course textbooks, seminars and previous
examinations. Students were also encouraged in class participations to develop their oral

communication skills.

Research skills

Research skills include the ability to locate, obtain and organize information to be able

to solve the problem on hand (Burnett, 2003).

AICPA (2004), in its publication “AICPA Core Competency Framework for Entry

into the Accounting Profession,” states that research skills are important to those who

will enter the accountancy profession. It adds that the skills are useful for CPAs to access

relevant guidance or other information and be able to understand and apply it. Moreover,

the elements of good research skills include the employment of relevant research skills,

the identification and access to relevant information, the ability to evaluate various

sources of data, and the ability to resolve conflicts with regards to the data.

The Philippine CHED (2006) agreed to this advocacy, evidenced by the issuance of

the “Revised Minimum Circular Requirements for Bachelor of Science in Accountancy”.

Schools of Accountancy are encouraged to undertake research activities in order to

improve teaching methodology, education, and accounting practices in the country.

Khani, Edwards, Read, Pope, and Freeman (1994) articulated ways on how they

prepared their accounting students as they face the work place. These professors required

students to find real-business problems and design a game plan in solving these problems.
Some of them asked students to analyze financial reports and to integrate macroeconomic

factors in their financial studies while others balance accounting theory with illustrations

of the real-world accounting practice. Since the development of research skills rests with

the student’s ability to gather, organize, assimilate data and present results of the

research, they encouraged their students to maximize the use of resources and apply all

the things learned in accounting classes in harnessing their research skills.

Despite the struggles being faced by the academic world of accounting, academicians

have placed high hopes in reforming the accounting education. Williams (1993) presents

that accounting education, because of its dynamic nature, should be transformed into a

program that would integrate all facets of accounting, business and general education into

the study and practice of accounting. Moreover, other than developing only the technical

skills, accounting education must also develop and upgrade the non-technical skills,

particularly the analytical, communication, and research skills. These, in turn, would

result to producing competent graduates and highly qualified CPAs ready to face the

challenges in the practice of the profession.

1.3 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

In line with the need to determine perceptions of Accountancy teachers and BSA

students of DLSU regarding the extent of the development of the analytical,

communication, and research (ACR) skills in the DLSU accountancy program, the

following research questions were formulated:


1. Is there significant correlation between the general evaluation on analytical skills

development in accounting education and :

1.1. Ability to evaluate and interpret financial data;

1.2. Ability to evaluate and interpret financial systems (e.g. internal control

system);

1.3. Ability to conclude and recommend based on analysis;

1.4. Problem solving;

1.5. Business cases;

1.6. Flow chart preparation;

1.7. On the job training;

1.8. Analysis of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT);

1.9. Design of theoretical questions discouraging memorization?

2. Are the following specific analytical skills developed/being developed in

accounting education and to what extent:

2.1 Ability to evaluate and interpret financial data;

2.2 Ability to evaluate and interpret financial systems (e.g. internal control

system);

2.3 Ability to conclude and recommend based on analysis;

2.4 Problem solving;

2.5 Business cases;

2.6 Flow chart preparation;

2.7 On the job training;


2.8 Analysis of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT);

and

2.9 Design of theoretical questions discouraging memorization.

3. In general, are analytical skills developed/being developed in the accounting

education? To what extent?

4. Is there significant correlation between general evaluation on communication

skills development in accounting education and:

4.1 Ability to verbally explain financial information;

4.2 Ability to explain in writing financial information;

4.3 Ability to ask clear and relevant questions;

4.4 Ability to communicate effectively one's points of views;

4.5 Ability to deliver powerful presentations;

4.6 Ability to persuade and convince others;

4.7 Graded recitation;

4.8 Reporting in class (e.g. presentation of business cases, and explaining

solutions to accounting problems);

4.9 Debates on accounting issues;

4.10 Open forum with lecturers and practitioners;

4.11 Written reports (e.g. business cases);

4.12 Writing essays as part of exam question;

4.13 Writing term papers;


4.14 Receiving feedback from teachers on business cases, research papers, and

other written requirements submitted;

4.15 Posture;

4.16 Facial expression;

4.17 Eye contact;

4.18 Personal appearance;

4.19 Mere listening;

4.20 Listening and taking notes at the same time;

4.21 Giving feedback (e.g. paraphrasing what was said, commenting, etc.)?

5 Are the following specific communication skills developed/being developed in

accounting education and to what extent:

5.1 Ability to verbally explain financial information;

5.2 Ability to explain in writing financial information;

5.3 Ability to ask clear and relevant questions;

5.4 Ability to communicate effectively one's points of views;

5.5 Ability to deliver powerful presentations;

5.6 Ability to persuade and convince others;

5.7 Graded recitation;

5.8 Reporting in class (e.g. presentation of business cases, and explaining

solutions to accounting problems);

5.9 Debates on accounting issues;

5.10 Open forum with lecturers and practitioners;


5.11 Written reports (e.g. business cases);

5.12 Writing essays as part of exam question;

5.13 Writing term papers;

5.14 Receiving feedback from teachers on business cases, research papers, and

other written requirements submitted;

5.15 Posture;

5.16 Facial expression;

5.17 Eye contact;

5.18 Personal appearance;

5.19 Mere listening;

5.20 Listening and taking notes at the same time; and

5.21 Giving feedback (e.g. paraphrasing what was said, commenting, etc.)?

6. In general, is communication skills developed/being developed in accounting

education? To what extent?

7. Is there significant correlation between the general evaluation on research skills

development in accounting education and:

7.1 Basic and applied research;

7.2 Business cases;

7.3 Industry studies;

7.4 Feasibility studies;

7.5 Reference to other text materials;


7.6 Taking a formal course on research methodology (separate subject/course);

7.7 Awareness on the nature, impact, and consequence of plagiarism;

7.8 Ability to link data, knowledge, and insights gathered from various sources?

8. Are the following specific research skills developed/being developed in

accounting education and to what extent:

8.1 Basic and applied research;

8.2 Business cases;

8.3 Industry studies;

8.4 Feasibility studies;

8.5 Reference to other text materials;

8.6 Taking a formal course on research methodology (separate subject/course);

8.7 Awareness on the nature, impact, and consequence of plagiarism; and

8.8 Ability to link data, knowledge, and insights gathered from various sources?

9. In general, is research skills developed/being developed in accounting education?

To what extent?

10. Is there significant correlation between the Mandatory Continuing Professional

Education and:

10.1 General evaluation for analytical skills development;

10.2 General evaluation for communication skills development;

10.3 General evaluation for research skills development?


11. Is there significant correlation between the notion that ACR skills are developed

more through own experience rather than classroom learning and:

11.1 General evaluation for analytical skills development;

11.2 General evaluation for communication skills development;

11.3 General evaluation for research skills development?

12. Is there significant correlation between De La Salle University, specifically the

Accountancy Department’s ACR skills development of its accountancy students

and

12.1 General evaluation for analytical skills development;

12.2 General evaluation for communication skills development;

12.3 General evaluation for research skills development?

13. Is there a need to rank ACR skills in the order of importance?

1.4 STATEMENT OF RESEARCH OBJECTIVES

General

This study aims to determine the perceptions of accountancy teachers and BSA

students of DLSU regarding the extent of the development of the analytical,

communication, and research skills in the DLSU accountancy program.


Specific

In examining closely the perceptions of DLSU Accountancy faculty and BSA

students, this study specifically aims:

1. To determine if there is significant correlation between the general evaluation on

analytical skills development in accounting education and:

1.1 Ability to evaluate and interpret financial data;

1.2 Ability to evaluate and interpret financial systems (e.g. internal control

system);

1.3 Ability to conclude and recommend based on analysis;

1.4 Problem solving;

1.5 Business cases;

1.6 Flow chart preparation;

1.7 On the job training;

1.8 Analysis of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT);

1.9 Design of theoretical questions discouraging memorization.

2. To determine if the following specific analytical skills are developed/being

developed in accounting education:

2.1 Ability to evaluate and interpret financial data;

2.2 Ability to evaluate and interpret financial systems (e.g. internal control

system);

2.3 Ability to conclude and recommend based on analysis;


2.4 Problem solving;

2.5 Business cases;

2.6 Flow chart preparation;

2.7 On the job training;

2.8 Analysis of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT);

and

2.9 Design of theoretical questions discouraging memorization.

3. To determine if analytical skills in general are developed/being developed in

accounting education.

4. To determine if there is significant correlation between general evaluation on

communication skills development in accounting education and:

4.1 Ability to verbally explain financial information;

4.2 Ability to explain in writing financial information;

4.3 Ability to ask clear and relevant questions;

4.4 Ability to communicate effectively one's points of views;

4.5 Ability to deliver powerful presentations;

4.6 Ability to persuade and convince others;

4.7 Graded recitation;

4.8 Reporting in class (e.g. presentation of business cases, and explaining

solutions to accounting problems);

4.9 Debates on accounting issues;


4.10 Open forum with lecturers and practitioners;

4.11 Written reports (e.g. business cases);

4.12 Writing essays as part of exam question;

4.13 Writing term papers;

4.14 Receiving feedback from teachers on business cases, research papers, and

other written requirements submitted;

4.15 Posture;

4.16 Facial expression;

4.17 Eye contact;

4.18 Personal appearance;

4.19 Mere listening;

4.20 Listening and taking notes at the same time;

4.21 Giving feedback (e.g. paraphrasing what was said, commenting, etc.).

5. To determine if the following specific communication skills are developed/being

developed in accounting education:

5.1 Ability to verbally explain financial information;

5.2 Ability to explain in writing financial information;

5.3 Ability to ask clear and relevant questions;

5.4 Ability to communicate effectively one's points of views;

5.5 Ability to deliver powerful presentations;

5.6 Ability to persuade and convince others;

5.7 Graded recitation;


5.8 Reporting in class (e.g. presentation of business cases, and explaining

solutions to accounting problems);

5.9 Debates on accounting issues;

5.10 Open forum with lecturers and practitioners;

5.11 Written reports (e.g. business cases);

5.12 Writing essays as part of exam question;

5.13 Writing term papers;

5.14 Receiving feedback from teachers on business cases, research papers, and

other written requirements submitted;

5.22 Posture;

5.23 Facial expression;

5.24 Eye contact;

5.25 Personal appearance;

5.26 Mere listening;

5.27 Listening and taking notes at the same time; and

5.28 Giving feedback (e.g. paraphrasing what was said, commenting, etc.).

6. To determine if communication skills in general are developed/being developed in

accounting education.

7. To determine if there is significant correlation between the general evaluation on

research skills development in accounting education and:

7.1 Basic and applied research;


7.2 Business cases;

7.3 Industry studies;

7.4 Feasibility studies;

7.5 Reference to other text materials;

7.6 Taking a formal course on research methodology (separate

subject/course);

7.7 Awareness on the nature, impact, and consequence of plagiarism;

7.8 Ability to link data, knowledge, and insights gathered from various

sources.

8. To determine if the following specific research skills are developed/being

developed in accounting education:

8.1 Basic and applied research;

8.2 Business cases;

8.3 Industry studies;

8.4 Feasibility studies;

8.5 Reference to other text materials;

8.6 Taking a formal course on research methodology (separate

subject/course);

8.7 Awareness on the nature, impact, and consequence of plagiarism;

8.8 Ability to link data, knowledge, and insights gathered from various

sources.
9. To determine if research skills in general are developed/being developed in

accounting education.

10. To determine if there is significant correlation between the Mandatory Continuing

Professional Education and:

10.1 General evaluation for analytical skills development;

10.2 General evaluation for communication skills development;

10.3 General evaluation for research skills development.

11. To determine if there is significant correlation between the notion that ACR skills

are developed more through own experience rather than classroom learning and:

11.1 General evaluation for analytical skills development;

11.2 General evaluation for communication skills development;

11.3 General evaluation for research skills development.

12. To determine if there is significant correlation between De La Salle University,

specifically the Accountancy Department’s ACR skills development of its

accountancy students and

12.1 General evaluation for analytical skills development;

12.2 General evaluation for communication skills development;

12.3 General evaluation for research skills development.

13. To determine if there is a need to rank ACR skills in the order of importance.
1.5 SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY

This paper shall cover the perceptions of DLSU BSA students currently enrolled

during the third trimester of school year 2005-06 as well as Accountancy Faculty

members with teaching loads during the said trimester.

In the conduct of this research, the following limitations were set:

1. Despite the need to develop skills other than analytical, communication and

research, to attain quality accounting education, the study was limited to these

three skills only due to the emphasis placed by literature on these skills.

2. The study is limited to the perceptions of BSA students and Accountancy faculty

members on the development of ACR skills.

3. The study did not include DLSU BSA alumni due to non-availability of contact

information.

4. Though a focused group discussion was conducted with the accounting

practitioners regarding their perceptions on the development of ACR skills, the

study was only made to get general information and opinion of practitioner to

verify aspects of related literature. Practitioners were not included as the study is

limited only to those directly involved in accounting education, specifically

students and teachers.

5. The students who were subjected to the pilot testing of the survey questionnaire

may also be selected for the actual survey due to random sampling. The teachers

who were helpful in the pilot testing of the survey questionnaire will be surely
being selected to answer the revised and final survey questionnaire due to

purposive sampling.
CHAPTER 2

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

2.1 ASSUMPTIONS OF THE STUDY

This study is aimed at determining the development of analytical, communication and

research skills in the accounting education as perceived by the DLSU accountancy

students and faculty members. Prior to the actual conduct of the study, the following

assumptions were posed:

1. The development of analytical, communication and research skills in the

accounting education are necessary to produce competent graduates and

successful professionals;

2. Technical skills and other skills are already inherent or developed among

accountancy students;

3. Both students and faculty members are involved in the development of analytical,

communication and research skills;

4. Incoming college students already possess a certain degree of ACR skills and

these skills shall be further developed in the accounting education;

5. No cause-effect relationship is assumed between perceptions of students and

teachers and between ACR skills in general and the sub-skills; and

6. Academic institutions incorporate in their accountancy programs the importance

of developing the ACR skills.


2.2 HYPOTHESES OF THE STUDY

The following hypotheses will be tested:

Null Hypotheses (Ho)

Ho1: The general evaluation on analytical skills development in accounting education has

no significant correlation with:

1.1 Ability to evaluate and interpret financial data

1.2 Ability to evaluate and interpret financial systems (e.g. internal control

system)

1.3 Ability to conclude and recommend based on analysis

1.4 Problem solving

1.5 Business cases

1.6 Flow chart preparation

1.7 On the job training

1.8 Analysis of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT)

1.9 Design of theoretical questions discouraging memorization

Ho2: The following specific analytical skills are not developed/being developed in

accounting education:

2.1 Ability to evaluate and interpret financial data


2.2 Ability to evaluate and interpret financial systems (e.g. internal control

system)

2.3 Ability to conclude and recommend based on analysis

2.4 Problem solving

2.5 Business cases

2.6 Flow chart preparation

2.7 On the job training

2.8 Analysis of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT)

2.9 Design of theoretical questions discouraging memorization

Ho3: Analytical skills in general are not developed/being developed in accounting

education.

Ho4: The general evaluation on communication skills development in accounting

education has no significant correlation with:

4.1 Ability to verbally explain financial information

4.2 Ability to explain in writing financial information

4.3 Ability to ask clear and relevant questions

4.4 Ability to communicate effectively one's points of view

4.5 Ability to deliver powerful presentations

4.6 Ability to persuade and convince others

4.7 Graded recitation


4.8 Reporting in class (e.g. presentation of business cases, and explaining

solutions to accounting problems)

4.9 Debates on accounting issues

4.10 Open forum with lecturers and practitioners

4.11 Written reports (e.g. business cases)

4.12 Writing essays as part of exam question

4.13 Writing term papers

4.14 Receiving feedback from teachers on business cases, research papers, and

other written requirements submitted

4.15 Posture

4.16 Facial expression

4.17 Eye contact

4.18 Personal appearance

4.19 Mere listening

4.20 Listening and taking notes at the same time

4.21 Giving feedback (e.g. paraphrasing what was said, commenting, etc.)

Ho5: The following specific communication skills are not developed/being developed in

accounting education:

5.1 Ability to verbally explain financial information

5.2 Ability to explain in writing financial information

5.3 Ability to ask clear and relevant questions

5.4 Ability to communicate effectively one's points of views


5.5 Ability to deliver powerful presentations

5.6 Ability to persuade and convince others

5.7 Graded recitation

5.8 Reporting in class (e.g. presentation of business cases, and explaining

solutions to accounting problems)

5.9 Debates on accounting issues

5.10 Open forum with lecturers and practitioners

5.11 Written reports (e.g. business cases)

5.12 Writing essays as part of exam question

5.13 Writing term papers

5.14 Receiving feedback from teachers on business cases, research papers, and

other written requirements submitted

5.15 Posture

5.16 Facial expression

5.17 Eye contact

5.18 Personal appearance

5.19 Mere listening

5.20 Listening and taking notes at the same time

5.21 Giving feedback (e.g. paraphrasing what was said, commenting, etc.)

Ho6: Communication skills in general are not developed/being developed in accounting

education.
Ho7: The general evaluation on research skills development in accounting education has

no significant correlation with:

7.1 Basic and applied research

7.2 Business cases

7.3 Industry studies

7.4 Feasibility studies

7.5 Reference to other text materials

7.6 Taking a formal course on research methodology (separate subject/course)

7.7 Awareness on the nature, impact, and consequence of plagiarism

7.8 Ability to link data, knowledge, and insights gathered from various

sources

Ho8: The following specific research skills are not developed/being developed in

accounting education:

8.1 Basic and applied research

8.2 Business cases

8.3 Industry studies

8.4 Feasibility studies

8.5 Reference to other text materials

8.6 Taking a formal course on research methodology (separate subject/course)

8.7 Awareness on the nature, impact, and consequence of plagiarism

8.8 Ability to link data, knowledge, and insights gathered from various

sources
Ho9: As perceived by DLSU Accountancy students and faculty members, research skills

in general are not developed/being developed in accounting education.

Ho10: The Mandatory Continuing Professional Education has no significant correlation

with:

10.1 General evaluation for analytical skills development

10.2 General evaluation for communication skills development

10.3 General evaluation for research skills development.

Ho11: There is no significant correlation between the notion that ACR skills are developed

more through own experience rather than classroom learning and:

11.1 General evaluation for analytical skills development

11.2 General evaluation for communication skills development

11.3 General evaluation for research skills development.

Ho12: There is no significant correlation between De La Salle University, specifically the

Accountancy Department’s ACR skills development of its accountancy students and

12.1 General evaluation for analytical skills development

12.2 General evaluation for communication skills development

12.3 General evaluation for research skills development.

Ho13: There is no need to rank ACR skills in the order of importance.


Alternative Hypotheses (Ha)

Ha1: The general evaluation on analytical skills development in accounting education has

significant correlation with:

1.1 Ability to evaluate and interpret financial data

1.2 Ability to evaluate and interpret financial systems (e.g. internal control

system)

1.3 Ability to conclude and recommend based on analysis

1.4 Problem solving

1.5 Business cases

1.6 Flow chart preparation

1.7 On the job training

1.8 Analysis of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT)

1.9 Design of theoretical questions discouraging memorization

Ha2: The following specific analytical skills are developed/being developed in accounting

education:

2.1 Ability to evaluate and interpret financial data

2.2 Ability to evaluate and interpret financial systems (e.g. internal control

system)

2.3 Ability to conclude and recommend based on analysis

2.4 Problem solving

2.5 Business cases


2.6 Flow chart preparation

2.7 On the job training

2.8 Analysis of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT)

2.9 Design of theoretical questions discouraging memorization

Ha3: Analytical skills in general are developed/being developed in accounting education.

Ha4: The general evaluation on communication skills development in accounting

education has significant correlation with:

4.1 Ability to verbally explain financial information

4.2 Ability to explain in writing financial information

4.3 Ability to ask clear and relevant questions

4.4 Ability to communicate effectively one's points of views

4.5 Ability to deliver powerful presentations

4.6 Ability to persuade and convince others

4.7 Graded recitation

4.8 Reporting in class (e.g. presentation of business cases, and explaining

solutions to accounting problems)

4.9 Debates on accounting issues

4.10 Open forum with lecturers and practitioners

4.11 Written reports (e.g. business cases)

4.12 Writing essays as part of exam question

4.13 Writing term papers


4.14 Receiving feedback from teachers on business cases, research papers, and

other written requirements submitted

4.15 Posture

4.16 Facial expression

4.17 Eye contact

4.18 Personal appearance

4.19 Mere listening

4.20 Listening and taking notes at the same time

4.21 Giving feedback (e.g. paraphrasing what was said, commenting, etc.)

Ha5: The following specific communication skills are developed/being developed in

accounting education:

5.1 Ability to verbally explain financial information

5.2 Ability to explain in writing financial information

5.3 Ability to ask clear and relevant questions

5.4 Ability to communicate effectively one's points of views

5.5 Ability to deliver powerful presentations

5.6 Ability to persuade and convince others

5.7 Graded recitation

5.8 Reporting in class (e.g. presentation of business cases, and explaining

solutions to accounting problems)

5.9 Debates on accounting issues

5.10 Open forum with lecturers and practitioners


5.11 Written reports (e.g. business cases)

5.12 Writing essays as part of exam question

5.13 Writing term papers

5.14 Receiving feedback from teachers on business cases, research papers, and

other written requirements submitted

5.29 Posture

5.30 Facial expression

5.31 Eye contact

5.32 Personal appearance

5.33 Mere listening

5.34 Listening and taking notes at the same time

5.35 Giving feedback (e.g. paraphrasing what was said, commenting, etc.)

Ha6: Communication skills in general are developed/being developed in accounting

education.

Ha7: The general evaluation on research skills development in accounting education has

significant correlation with:

7.1 Basic and applied research

7.2 Business cases

7.3 Industry studies

7.4 Feasibility studies

7.5 Reference to other text materials


7.6 Taking a formal course on research methodology (separate subject/course)

7.7 Awareness on the nature, impact, and consequence of plagiarism

7.8 Ability to link data, knowledge, and insights gathered from various

sources

Ha8: The following specific research skills are developed/being developed in accounting

education:

8.1 Basic and applied research

8.2 Business cases

8.3 Industry studies

8.4 Feasibility studies

8.5 Reference to other text materials

8.6 Taking a formal course on research methodology (separate subject/course)

8.7 Awareness on the nature, impact, and consequence of plagiarism

8.8 Ability to link data, knowledge, and insights gathered from various

sources

Ha9: Research skills in general are developed/being developed in accounting education.

Ha10: The Mandatory Continuing Professional Education has significant correlation with:

10.1 General evaluation for analytical skills development

10.2 General evaluation for communication skills development

10.3 General evaluation for research skills development.


Ha11: There is significant correlation between the notion that ACR skills are developed

more through own experience rather than classroom learning and:

11.1 General evaluation for analytical skills development

11.2 General evaluation for communication skills development

11.3 General evaluation for research skills development.

Ha12: There is significant correlation between De La Salle University, specifically the

Accountancy Department’s ACR skills development of its accountancy students and

12.1 General evaluation for analytical skills development

12.2 General evaluation for communication skills development

12.3 General evaluation for research skills development.

Ha13: There is a need to rank ACR skills in the order of importance.

2.3 OPERATIONAL DEFINITIONS

Presented below are the important terms are used in this study:

1. Accountancy is the measurement, disclosure or provision of assurance about

information that helps managers and other decision makers make resource

allocation decisions.

2. Accounting education is a systematic process aimed at developing accounting

knowledge, skills, and other capabilities within individuals.


3. Analytical skills pertain to the ability of a person in identifying and solving

unstructured problems in unfamiliar settings and exercising judgments based on

the comprehension of unfocused set of facts (Burnett, 2003).

4. Bachelor of Science in Accountancy (BSA) is a college level accounting degree

program set forth in the Philippine Accountancy Act of 2004 and in CHED

Memorandum Order No. 26, Series of 2006.

5. Communication skills involve both receiving and transmitting information and

concepts, including effective reading, listening, writing and speaking (Burnett,

2003).

6. Continuing Professional Education (CPE) is the requirement for Certified

Public Accountants for updates and furtherance of learning related to the

accounting profession set forth in the Philippine Accountancy Act of 2004.

7. Essay writing is an analytic, interpretative, or critical literary composition,

usually dealing with its subject from a limited and often personal point of view.

8. Faculty is a collective noun for the academic staff of a college or a university:

professors, lecturers, or instructors. The terms faculty, faculty members, and

teachers are interchangeable for purposes of this research. The “teachers” or

“faculty members” in this study shall refer to Accountancy teachers, whether part-

time or full-time, unless otherwise stated.

9. On-the-job training refers to the acquisition of knowledge, skills, and attitudes

as a result of the teaching of vocational or practical skills and knowledge that

relate to specific useful skills which is concerned with workplace learning to

improve performance.
10. Plagiarism occurs when a writer deliberately uses someone else's language,

ideas, or other original (not common-knowledge) material without acknowledging

its source (Sutherland, 2004).

11. Problem solving is defined as higher-order cognitive process that requires the

modulation and control of more routine or fundamental cognitive skills.

12. Research skills include the ability to locate, obtain and organize information to

be able to solve the problem on hand (Burnett, 2003).

13. Student refers to the person attending class in a college or university. The term

“students” used in this paper shall refer to Accountancy or BSA students, unless

otherwise stated.

2.4 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

Based on information gathered from previous studies, success in the accountancy

profession requires analytical, communication and research skills. These skills will serve

as measures in determining the quality of today’s accounting graduates as perceived as

accounting educators.

The need for upgrading the knowledge and skills in accounting requires the

involvement of both faculty and students. According to Levine and Wright (1987),

faculty members should first possess the current knowledge about the subject, in addition

to their interest in teaching the subject. They should also recognize individual differences

of students towards learning. Therefore, their teaching methods should encourage


students to learn more. Examples include harnessing their verbal communication skills,

utilization of modern business problems, effective utilization of multimedia aids, and

demanding, yet encouraging performance standards.

The methods should be intellectually stimulating, to train students to use their

analytical skills. Additional learning activities such as text-lecture-homework

relationships should be complemented with the development of research skills in order to

foster the need of maximizing all the learning resources found within and outside the

school. Lastly, teachers should develop and maintain their professional character.

Students, on the other hand, should show their interest in the subject matter. They

should be responsible in accomplishing all school work and should see to it that they

learn while doing their home works and other projects. Students should avoid tardiness or

absences, when possible, in order not to miss important lectures and activities involving

class participation. Students should develop a positive learning behavior towards their

studies, as it would be useful for them as they embark towards their professional career.

With all these expectations from both faculty and students, it can be inferred that a

more stimulating learning environment will be created, hence, expected to contribute to

the improvement and betterment of the quality of education, particularly in accounting.

The AICPA Framework for Accounting Education harnesses the expectations from

both faculty and students (Anonymous, 2001). Combining both perspectives of Levine
and Wright (1987) and AICPA, Figure 1 presents these expectations for a quality

accounting education framework:

Figure 1

Conceptual Framework for a Quality Accounting Education

I FUNCTIONAL INVOLVEMENT OF
N COMPETENCIES: BOTH FACULTY AND
Analytical Skills,
D Technological STUDENTS
E Adeptness
P
E
N
D PERSONAL
E COMPETENCIES:
N Leadership,
Communication
T skills, Problem- QUALITY ACCOUNTING
Solving, Decision EDUCATION LEADING
V Making
TO COMPETENT
A GRADUATES AND
R SUCCESSFUL
I BROAD
BUSINESS PROFESSIONALS
A
COMPETENCIES:
B Critical Thinking,
L Client-Focused, DEPENDENT VARIABLE
E Global
S Perspective

2.5 OPERATIONAL FRAMEWORK

Figure 2 shows the operational framework of the study. This study aims to provide

insight to the development of ACR skills, as perceived by De La Salle University

Accountancy students and faculty members.


Figure 2

Operational Framework

Independent Variables
• Analytical skills Dependent Variable
• Communication skills Development of ACR skills
• Research skills in Accounting Education

Intervening Variable
De La Salle University (Perception of
Accountancy students and Faculty Members)

The operational framework is considered this investigation’s functional and workable

model. The dependent variables that are being investigated are the ACR skills and sub-

skills which will be analyzed and correlated with the independent variable, i.e. the

general development of ACR skills in accounting education. These two variables

however are impinged by the perceptions of BSA students and faculty members.
CHAPTER 3

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3.1 RESEARCH DESIGN

This study utilized a descriptive research design, aimed at determining the similarities

and differences of student and teacher perceptions on the development of analytical,

communication and research skills in Accounting education.

3.2 SAMPLING PLAN

Student population and sample size

Through the My.LaSalle website, class lists of accounting subjects exclusively offered

to BSA students were downloaded to determine the student population. The population

excluded the subjects with invalid subject codes. The presumption is that the students

will not be able to enroll on these subjects since they were rendered as invalid.

The student population was grouped into five strata, namely freshmen, sophomores,

juniors, seniors and terminal. Freshmen or first-level students included those with ID

numbers 105. Sophomores or second-level students included those with ID numbers 104.

Juniors or third-level students included those with ID numbers 103. Seniors or fourth-

level students included those with ID numbers 102 and terminal level students or those
with ID numbers 101 and below. The total student population based on these class lists

totaled 502.

The sample size was computed using the formula shown below at 95% confidence

interval and .05 sampling error.

Nzα/22 (p) (1-p)


n = ___________________________

NE2 + z α/22 (p) (1-p)

502(1.96)2 (0.5) (0.5)


= __________________________

502(.05)2 + (1.96)2 (0.5) (0.5)

= 218

The stratified sampling was used to ensure that each year level was represented in the

sample. Table 1 below shows the population for each stratum, and the proportional

allocation for the entire BSA population.

Table 1

Sample size allocation among the different year levels of BSA students in De La Salle

University

No. of
Stratum Percentage Students
Year Level Size (N) Distribution Sampled (n)*
First 206 40.83% 89
Second 50 10.09% 22
Third 76 15.14% 33
Fourth 115 22.94% 50
Other 55 11.00% 24
TOTAL 502 100.00% 218
The respondents for each stratum were identified through random sampling.

Teacher population

The population of DLSU Accountancy Faculty was determined by obtaining a copy of

the faculty plantilla from the department. Currently, there are 15 full-time faculty

members and 11 part-time faculty members. To enhance objectivity, two faculty

members who are members of the research group conducting this study were excluded in

the teacher population, thereby, reducing the teacher population to 14 full-time and 10

part-time faculty members.

Given the small number of faculty members of the Accountancy Department, the

requirements for the Central Limit Theorem cannot be obtained. Thus, the researchers

decided to survey the entire population to form a more reasonable conclusion.

3.3 METHOD OF DATA COLLECTION

The primary data collection method was employed to gather the needed facts and

figures to complete the research. The most common technique of using survey

questionnaires was utilized to address the study’s hypotheses and objectives. It was

partially formulated by conducting focused group discussions (FGD) with teachers,

students and practitioners. FGD guides were devised and the researchers set different

schedules to conduct the discussions separately for each of the three groups. Using the
results from the FGD and combining these with related literature data supporting the

study, the final questionnaire was outlined.

The survey questionnaire was divided into five parts. Section 1 addressed the profile

of the respondents. Questions on analytical, communication and research skills were

tackled on Sections 2 to 4. Section 5 discussed other matters such as Continuing

Professional Education (CPE) and the relationship between classroom learning and work

experience. It also tackled the overall assessment of the students’ and faculty members’

perceptions on the developments of the analytical, communication and research skills.

The survey questionnaires were personally handed out to faculty members of the

Accountancy Department. The researchers also sought their assistance in distributing the

survey questionnaires to the selected students. Completed survey questionnaires by the

faculty members were personally returned to any member of the group while completed

survey questionnaires answered by the students were first collected by their respective

accounting professors and forwarded to the researchers for tallying.

3.4 METHOD OF DATA ANALYSIS

The study made use of the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), a statistical

software for data analysis suitable for designed experiments, regression problems,

correlation analysis, and other statistical capabilities (Edralin, 2002).


In order to investigate and answer the hypotheses presented in the study, the data

obtained from the students and faculty members were analyzed and summarized

according to type (numerical) and level of measurement (ordinal) using bivariate

correlations. Responses were assigned numerical values using a Likert-type scale to

measure the degree of ACR skills development based on the perceptions of respondents.

Responses related to the development of ACR skills were scaled according to the

following:

5 – Agree, it is FULLY developed

4 – Agree, it is CONSIDERABLY developed/being developed

3 – Agree, it is MODERATELY developed/being developed

2 – Agree, it is SLIGHTLY developed/being developed

1 – Disagree, it is NOT developed/being developed

0 – No answer

Correlation was done using Spearman Rank Correlation to measure the variables on

an ordinal scale. The researchers correlated each general evaluation statement per skill to

survey items related to the specific skill. In addition, to determine the extent of

development of each item to the specific skill, the mean responses for both Accountancy

students and faculty members were computed and tallied.

Any difference in the correlation coefficients for both Accountancy students and

faculty members can be attributed to the sampling size. In this research, smaller

correlation for students can be statistically significant because the number of randomly
selected student respondents is large. In contrast, because of the small sample size of the

teachers, a much larger correlation may be needed to achieve statistical significance.

However, despite the small sample size of teachers, it represents 100% of the faculty

members teaching in the current term.

The correlation coefficients obtained from both faculty and students were analyzed

independently and conclusions were drawn only within each group. The results were used

to accept or reject the null hypotheses specifically to prove that ACR skills are being

developed in the accounting education.


CHAPTER 4

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

This study was conducted in order to determine whether there are significant

correlations between general evaluation in the development of analytical,

communication, and research skills in accounting education and each of the specific

items under each skill. Additionally, the study seeks to answer the extent of development

of these ACR skills in accounting education.

Specifically, the survey focused on Accountancy students and faculty members of

DLSU to get their perceptions on several skills development questions and to rank these

according to the following:

5 – Agree, it is FULLY developed

4 – Agree, it is CONSIDERABLY developed/being developed

3 – Agree, it is MODERATELY developed/being developed

2 – Agree, it is SLIGHTLY developed/being developed

1 – Disagree, it is NOT developed/being developed

If the item was not answered, whether intentionally or otherwise, a zero (0) value was

assigned.

There were a total of 236 survey respondents of which 212 were students and 24 were

teachers. Their profile and the results of the survey were analyzed as follows:
Table 2

Demographics of Respondent Accountancy Students

Group 1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year Terminal Total
Gender
Male 25 8 9 13 6 61
Female 64 14 24 31 18 151
Agea
15-17 56 2 58
18-20 31 19 32 30 112
21-23 1 1 14 22 38
Over 23 1 1
Course
BSA 69 20 32 31 11 163
AE-BSA 18 2 10 9 39
LIA-BSA 1 1 3 3 8
Others 1 1 2
Dean’s Listerb
Yes 42 5 19 8 1 75
No 47 16 14 35 23 135
With accounting subject
in high schoolc
Yes 40 9 12 18 6 85
No 48 13 21 26 18 126

N 89 22 33 44 24 212

Note. aOne first year student and two terminal students gave no answer. bOne second year student and one
c
fourth year student gave no answer. One first year student gave no answer.

Table 2 summarizes the profile of Accountancy students who were randomly picked

as respondents to the survey questionnaires. Seventy one percent of the respondents were

females as opposed to 29% males and more than half of them are 18 to 20 years old.

Majority of them are purely BSA students and approximately 35% are dean’s listers. A

marginally high percentage reported having taken at least one accounting subject during

high school.
Table 3

Demographics of Respondent Accountancy Teachers

Part-time Full-time
Group Total
Faculty Faculty
Gender
Male 7 4 11
Female 3 10 13
Age
21-30 3 3 6
31-40 3 3 6
41-49 1 5 6
Over 50 3 3 6
Ranka
Assistant Lecturer 2 2
Assistant Professor 1 12 13
Guest Lecturer 2 2
Associate Professor 1 1
Lecturer 3 3
Instructor 1 1
Educational attainment
Bachelor 2 2
Masteral units 4 1 5
Master 3 7 10
Doctoral units 1 5 6
Doctorate 1 1
Number of years teaching
01-10 years 7 7 14
11-20 years 2 4 6
21-30 years 3 3
Over 30 years 1 1
Accounting subjects being taught - method
of teaching
Traditional method only 6 3 9
Modular method only 1 1
Combination of traditional and modular 3 11 14

Nb 10 14 24
Note. aTwo part-time faculty members did not give answer. bTotal number of faculty members
representing 100% of the population.

With the use of random sampling, bias was avoided. All students had equal chances

of being chosen and to further ensure that each year level was well-represented, stratified
sampling using Probability Proportional to Size method was used. A total of 218

students were chosen to comprise the sample size and only 212 were collected and

considered valid. The sample size provided for a 95% confidence level with a margin of

error of 0.05. The data gathered as well as the resulting analysis may best be described as

highly representative sample of the population.

Table 3 provides the summary profile of Accountancy faculty members currently

teaching (3rd term, SY 2005-2006) accounting subjects. It appears that there are more

male part-time teachers and more female full-time teachers. Faculty members’ ages are

also evenly spread. Most of the teachers have already finished their master degree and

about 60% have been teaching for 10 years or less. Also, as can be observed from the

data in the table, only one teacher uses the modular method of teaching while nine of

them still use the traditional method. However, majority of the teachers teach their

accounting subjects using either traditional or modular method. There may be a

possibility that the method of teaching may affect teachers’ perception on the

development of ACR skills.

The purposive sampling, a non-probability sampling method, was used due to the

small population of faculty members of the Accountancy Department. The 24 teachers,

which excluded the two teachers who are members of the research group conducting this

study, are the most appropriate sources of data. Since the Central Limit Theorem cannot

be attained, all the teachers were included in the survey. Their responses may therefore

be treated as more than adequate to be able to answer the research questions focusing on

teachers’ perceptions and to form conclusions to meet the objectives of the research.
Table 4

Mean Responses of Students and Teachers on General Evaluation of ACR Skill

M
Skill (General Evaluation) a
Students Teachersb
Analytical skills 3.59 3.62
Communication skills 3.07 3.42
Research skills 3.88 3.71
a
n = 212. bN = 24.

As shown in table 4, all three skills evaluated in general are in between the ranges of

3.00 to 4.00. This may mean that both Accountancy students and faculty members

perceive that in the accounting education, the ACR skills are being developed. The

extent to which these are being developed are from moderate to considerable. Students

rank the research skills as the skill that is given the most emphasis in the development of

all three skills. Teachers also share the same view.

The mean responses may reinforce the belief that ACR skills are being developed in

accounting education as required by CHED Memorandum Order No. 26 in order to

“produce competent professional accountants capable of making a positive contribution

over their lifetimes to the profession and society in which they work.” (p. 3). With these

skills being developed in school, it is highly possible that accountancy graduates would

possess, on top of the required technical skills, equally important skills needed to pursue

a successful long-term professional accounting career. Furthermore, with the students

and the faculty perceiving the importance of developing ACR skills and the extent to

which these are being developed, it may help in designing methods of teaching and ways
of learning to make ACR skills be developed more extensively to help prepare

Accountancy students for CPA board examinations (AICPA, 2004).

Ranking the mean responses, both groups are in agreement. Most developed skill is

research, followed by analytical, and lastly, communications. CMO No. 26 strongly

emphasizes research skills development and schools of Accountancy are being

encouraged “to undertake research and operate with a competent and qualified research

staff” to produce scholarly outputs. The two groups’ perception that research skills are

more than considerably developed in accounting education may be in line with the

memorandum. However, it may be qualified as biased on the part of the two groups since

all respondents come from DLSU which considers itself a research university.

Although ranked as more or less moderately developed by both students and teachers,

communication skills development may still need enhancing. As Pearson (1995) pointed

out, a complete change in accounting curricula is not necessary, rather, teaching

methodologies may be revised to help students improve their communication skills. The

study by Hussain, Al-Darayseh, and D’Ouville (1994) supports the current trend of

employer dissatisfaction with regard to accountants’ perceived lack of communication

skills which can be equated with the “moderately developed/being developed” average

response of students and teachers alike.


Table 5

Spearman Correlation Coefficients for Analytical Skills with Mean Responses by Students

and Teachers

rs______ _____ M_________


Item a
S Tb Sa Tb
Problem solving 0.34** 0.20 4.51 4.71
Evaluate and interpret financial data 0.50** 0.00 4.10 4.29
Business cases 0.36** 0.53* 3.98 4.13
Conclude and recommend based on
0.40** 0.45* 3.61 4.08
Analysis
Evaluate and interpret financial
0.25** 0.44* 3.60 3.50
systems
Design of theoretical questions
0.41** 0.46* 3.51 3.79
discouraging memorization
SWOT Analysis 0.24** 0.05 3.36 2.96
Flow chart preparation 0.32** 0.30 3.17 2.88
On-the-job training 0.12 -0.30 3.17 2.75
Note. Items correlated with General Evaluation of Analytical Skills Development. S = students; T =
Teachers.
a
n = 212. bN = 24.
*ip < .05. **p < .01.

Table 5 shows the correlation coefficients for each analytical skill sub-statement

correlated with general evaluation statement for analytical skills and the mean responses

of DLSU accountancy students and faculty members. As can be seen from the data in

table 5, using Spearman Rank Correlation (rs), the students perceive that the ability to

evaluate and interpret financial data is most highly correlated with the overall evaluation

of analytical skills according to rank. For teachers, the use of business cases in

accounting courses is perceived to be the highest correlated analytical tool to develop

students’ analytical skills although correlation is significant only at the .05 level, 2-tailed.

It is surprising to note, however, using the mean responses of both students and teachers,

for they both share the same view that it is the application of problem solving in
accounting courses which is perceived to develop students’ analytical skills most

considerably.

BSA graduates are expected to possess intellectual skills, particularly analysis,

problem solving, and critical thinking (CHED, 2006). These can be demonstrated aptly

by having core knowledge in accounting and related areas. As perceived by students, the

tools to help develop analytical skill, except for on-the-job training, are highly and

significantly correlated to the generalization that analytical skills in accounting education

are being developed. In a study by Boldt (2001), she addresses the question whether

students possess the necessary accounting knowledge to become accounting experts. The

question may somewhat be answered by the significant correlation results and could

possibly mean that accounting education provides programs that help prepare students for

employment and give students some form of satisfaction with their education.

The teachers, in contrast, do not have the same level of agreement with students. Only

four analytical tools were significantly correlated and the significance was only at a 95%

level.

On the average, both groups listed and agreed on the top four analytical sub-skills as

considerably being developed in accounting education, namely, problem solving, ability

to evaluate and interpret financial data, use of business cases, and the ability to conclude

and recommend based on analysis. This reinforced the study of Dow and Feldmann

(1994) who called for incorporating case analysis as an effective way of developing the
analytical skills. CHED (2006) also highlighted the abilities to evaluate and interpret

financial data and to conclude and make recommendations, among others, as very

important skills that Accountancy graduates should possess.

Table 6

Spearman Correlation Coefficients for Communication Skills with Mean Responses by

Students and Teachers

____ rs_______ M_______


Item
Sa Tb S a
Tb
Oral communication
Class reporting 0.23** 0.59** 3.87 4.13
Ask clear and relevant questions 0.29** 0.25 3.72 4.33
Communicate effectively one's
0.36** 0.20 3.67 4.29
points of views
Graded recitation 0.25** 0.54** 3.67 3.75
Verbally explain financial
0.36** 0.30 3.63 4.13
information
Deliver powerful presentations 0.31** 0.29 3.50 4.04
Persuade and convince others 0.35** 0.27 3.42 3.75
Open forum 0.24** 0.47* 2.89 2.75
Debates on accounting issues 0.30** 0.66** 2.67 2.88
Written communication
Written reports 0.27** 0.13 4.29 4.33
Explain in writing financial
0.38** 0.34 3.96 4.17
information
Writing term papers 0.20** 0.34 3.53 3.75
Receiving feedbacks 0.30** 0.45* 3.16 3.88
Writing essays 0.13 0.66** 2.77 3.08
Non-verbal communication
Personal appearance 0.36** 0.30 3.29 3.46
Eye contact 0.44** 0.29 3.11 3.29
Facial expression 0.37** 0.34 2.89 3.00
Posture 0.40** 0.29 2.85 3.04
Listening
Listening and taking notes at the
0.30** -0.14 4.18 4.21
same time
Mere listening 0.24** -0.13 3.81 3.46
Giving feedback 0.38** 0.36 3.76 4.13
Note. Items correlated with General Evaluation of Communication Skills Development. S = students; T =
Teachers.
a
n = 212. bN = 24.
*p < .05. **p < .01.

Table 6 shows the correlation coefficients for each communication skill sub-statement

(categorized according to type of communication) correlated with general evaluation

statement for communication skills and the mean responses of DLSU accountancy

students and faculty members. The students placed highly significant correlations in

ranking for all items under oral communication category. This may not be applicable for

teachers who rank debates on accounting issues, class reporting, and graded recitation as

top three statistically significant correlation items associated with general communication

skills evaluation. For written communication, students do not place any significance in

ranking for writing essays which is the complete opposite for teachers who appear to

have identified it as the most highly significant item in correlating with the general

development of communication skills. Again, the results are consistent that students place

high significance of correlation in ranking for all non-verbal communication skills to

general communication skills evaluation while accounting teachers do not place ranking

significance to any of the said skills. Students also place high significance of correlation

in ranking for all listening skill items whereas the teachers do not.

Accounting students perceived that writing reports and listening and taking notes at

the same time, on the average, are the only communication sub-skills considerably being

developed in accounting education and the rest are just slightly or moderately being

developed. On the other hand, teachers perceive most communication sub-skills are
either considerably being developed or moderately being developed. Only open forum

and debates on accounting issues are given the mean response of slightly being

developed.

Currently, high value is placed on communication skills in all disciplines. Prober

(2004) argues that most academic subjects already incorporate acquisition of

communication skills and educators prepare students for communication-oriented

classroom settings. The correlation coefficients shown on table 6 may prove and

disprove his argument. This is so because based on the results of the student correlation,

most sub-skills are highly and significantly correlated with general evaluation on

communication skills. Conversely, the outcome of teacher correlation indicates only four

sub-skills are highly and significantly correlated.

The top oral communication sub-skill that is adequately developed was perceived by

both students and teachers to be class reporting while for written communication sub-

skills, it is writing reports. Listening and taking notes at the same time tops both groups’

choice of listening skills. These are in line with the Core Competency Framework for

Entry into the Philippine Accountancy Profession of the AICPA (2004). However, while

it is true that colleges keep the pipeline full of accounting graduates, it is not necessarily

true that accounting graduates have developed effective communication skills while in

college (Lon Addams, 1981). In line of the criticisms given out by employers on the

quality of graduates, there is apparently the need to further develop communication skills,

especially written and oral, during college years. It may be quite contradictory with the
mean responses of students and teachers. There may certain constraints that could factor

on why the groups responded, on the average, that communication skills are adequately

being developed. For one, DLSU operates on a trimestral basis which affects the design

of the course curricula. Having met the minimum requirement set by the Accountancy

Department may lead students to believe that they have adequately developed the skills.

Another reason can be that English subjects, technical and business writing,

communication arts, and related subjects are not exclusively controlled by the

Accountancy Department.

Table 7

Spearman Correlation Coefficients for Research Skills with Mean Responses by Students

and Teachers

___ rs______ ___ M______


Item
Sa Tb Sa Tb
Awareness on nature, impact and
0.55** 0.34 4.21 3.67
consequence of plagiarism
Reference to other school materials 0.55** 0.49* 4.16 4.46
Business cases 0.52** 0.37 4.14 4.04
Ability to link data, knowledge and
0.70** 0.47* 3.91 3.88
Insights
Basic and applied research 0.52** 0.61** 3.68 3.17
Formal course on research methodology 0.56** 0.56** 3.37 2.96
Industry studies 0.46** 0.63** 2.98 2.92
Feasibility Studies 0.39** 0.52** 2.83 2.63
Note. Items correlated with General Evaluation of Research Skills Development. S = students; T =
Teachers.
a
n = 212. bN = 24.
*p < .05. **p < .01.

Table 7 presents the correlation coefficients for each research skill sub-statement

correlated with general evaluation statement for research skills and the mean responses of
DLSU accountancy students and faculty members. Using Spearman rs, the students rank

the ability to link data, knowledge, and insights as highly correlated with the overall

evaluation of research skills development. According to teachers’ perception, industry

studies in accounting courses is the highest correlated research tool in helping develop

students’ research skills.

The mean responses indicate that awareness on nature, impact and consequence of

plagiarism is the students’ number one determinant of the extent of development of

research skills in accounting education Teachers, on the other hand, perceive that it is

reference to other school materials that is considerably being developed to promote

research skills in accounting education.

Gaining proficiency in research does not only mean knowing how to write research

paper but also going to the core of the topic. In today’s fast-paced world, most businesses

have realized the importance of business research, especially as a corporate strategy

geared towards maintaining competitive advantage and attaining organizational

objectives more efficiently (Edralin, 2002).

Of the top three research sub-skills perceived by students as considerably developed in

the accounting education namely, awareness on nature, impact and consequence of

plagiarism, reference to other school materials, and business cases, only the last two are

considered by the Accountancy Department as considerably developed. The third one is

the ability to link data, knowledge and insights obtained from various sources.
While research skills are not specifically mentioned as part of the core competencies

in a framework presented by the Board of Accountancy, the CHED (2006), in its

“Revised Minimum Curricular Requirements for Bachelor of Science in Accountancy,”

emphasized the importance of such skills.

Table 8

Spearman Rank Correlation of General Evaluation Statements Correlated with

Mandatory Continuing Professional Education (CPE) and the Mean Responses by

Students and Teachers

General evaluation ___ rs______ ____ M______


(Skills development) Sa Tb Sa Tb
Analytical skills development 0.29** 0.33 4.04 4.13
Communication skills development 0.21** 0.00 3.67 3.96
Research skills development 0.21** 0.16 3.78 3.88
Note. S = Students; T = Teachers.
a
n = 212. bN = 24.
*p < .05. **p < .01.

Table 8 summarizes the correlation output for Mandatory Continuing Professional

Education (CPE) correlated with general evaluation statement for each of the skills and

the mean responses of DLSU accountancy students and faculty members. Using

Spearman Rank correlation, each of the skills is highly significantly correlated at α =

0.01. In the case of teachers, it appears that there is no significant correlation between

each of the three general evaluation skills development and the mandatory CPE. Both

students and teachers, however, are in concordance that mandatory CPE, on the average,

will help further develop each of the skills.


The Philippine Institute of Certified Public Accountants (2005) issued guidelines

mandating the continuing education program for all CPAs. This was in response to the

recently enacted Philippine Accountancy Act of 2004, requiring among others, that CPAs

shall continue updating knowledge with latest trends in the accountancy profession and at

the same time earn CPE credits to meet one of the requirements for the renewal of CPA

license. Because of this requirement, ACR skills are more likely to be developed even

after passing the licensure exam and will make the Filipino CPAs more globally

competitive.

Table 9

Spearman Rank Correlation of General Evaluation Statements Correlated with the

Notion that ACR Skills are Developed More Through Experience and the Mean

Responses by Students and Teachers

rs______ M _____
(Skills development) a
S Tb S a
Tb
Analytical skills development -0.01 0.13 3.63 4.08
Communication skills development 0.14* 0.22 4.10 3.96
Research skills development 0.12 0.44* 3.37 3.58
Note. S = Students; T = Teachers.
a
n = 212. bn = 24.
*p < .05.

Table 9 summarizes the correlation coefficients for the variable that ACR skills are

developed more through own experience rather than classroom learning correlated with

general evaluation statement for each of the skills and the mean responses of DLSU

accountancy students and faculty members. Using Spearman rank correlation, only the

general evaluation for communication skills development and the general evaluation for
research skills development are significantly correlated according to the perceptions of

Accountancy students and Accounting teachers, respectively. By their mean responses, it

can be inferred that both students and teachers perceive all three skills are developed

highly through own experience than learned and taught inside classrooms.

The notion that ACR skills are developed more through experience than classroom

learning originated from the focused group discussion (FGD) not only with students but

also with practitioners. Although the correlation coefficient is significant only for

communication skills as perceived by students and research skills as perceived by

teachers, the mean responses of both groups still reinforced the belief, as can be seen in

their mean scores that range from 3.30 to 4.10.

Table 10 provides the correlation coefficients for overall opinion that DLSU,

specifically the Accountancy Department, helps develop the ACR skills of its

Accountancy students as correlated with general evaluation statement for each of the

skills and the mean responses of DLSU accountancy students and faculty members. The

two groups are completely in contrast with each other using Spearman rank correlation,

that is, Accountancy students signify a very high statistically significant correlation of all

three skills development while teachers do not appear to show any significant correlation.

Using mean responses, the teachers may have the tendency to overstate their rating of the

extent of skills development by the DLSU Accountancy Department to their students,

especially on analytical and communication skills development. The students seem to be


more conservative in rating the extent they are being helped by the said department in

developing the three skills.

Table 10

Spearman Rank Correlation of General Evaluation Statements correlated with the

Opinion that De La Salle University, specifically the Accountancy Department helps

develop the ACR skills of Accountancy Students and the Mean Responses by Students and

Teachers

General Evaluation ___ rs____ ____ M_____


(Skills development) Sa Tb Sa Tb
Analytical skills development 0.35** 0.23 4.21 4.38
Communication skills development 0.25** 0.31 3.50 4.33
Research skills development 0.55** 0.60 3.46 3.75
Note. S = Students; T = Teachers.
a
n = 212. bN = 24.
**p < .01.

CHED Memorandum Order No. 26 prescribes that schools of Accountancy maintain

the standards of accounting education in the Philippines comparable to global

perspective. The program of accounting education is expected to go beyond the

traditional norms of instruction, thereby increasing the emphasis for professionalism,

ethics, attitude, and adaptation to constant change. Based on the perceptions of both

students and faculty, it can be inferred that accountancy students can meet the demands

of the profession.
Table 11

Students Opinion on Reasons of Underdevelopment of ACR Skills of Accountancy

Students

Multiple Responsea % of % of
Count Rank
responses cases
Time constraints hamper the development of the
156 18 78 1
Skills
Students aim to get passing marks only 143 17 71 2
There is no clear orientation on the development
110 13 55 3
of ACR skills
Program is geared towards passing the CPA
105 12 52 4
Board exam
Students do not maximize the use of school
101 12 50 5
facilities to support development of ACR skills
Communication skills development is not
79 9 39 6
specifically part of the accountancy curriculum
There is no formal course/subject on research. 53 6 26 7
There is no formal course/subject on academic or
43 5 21 8
technical writing.
Research skills development is specifically part
24 3 12 9
of the accountancy curriculum
Analytical skills development is not specifically
23 3 11 10
part of the accountancy curriculum
Others 16 2 8 11

Total 853 100 424


Note. 11 missing cases.
a
n = 201.

Table 11 reveals that the number one reason according to students why the ACR skills

are not being developed or adequately being developed is that time constraints hamper

the development of skills. This accounts for 78% of the total respondents. Only 11 out

of 212 student respondents did not give any answer to this survey question. It is probable

that the 11 students may have perceived that ACR skills are already developed or

adequately being developed among Accountancy students.


It is a known fact that DLSU operates on a trimestral system. This means that for a 3-

unit subject, only 42 hours is allotted, as compared to universities under semestral basis,

which is approximately 54 hours per term. This 12-hour difference could have been

utilized to further develop the ACR skills. Moreover, the students may have perceived

that the structure of the modular program deterred the full development of the skills. This

was supported with the focused group discussion with the students.

Table 12

Teachers Opinion on Reasons of Underdevelopment of ACR Skills of Accountancy

Students,

Multiple Responsea % of % of
Count Rank
responses cases
Students do not maximize the use of school
17 18 85 1
facilities to support development of ACR skills
Students aim to get passing marks only 16 16 80 2
Time constraints hamper the development of the
14 14 70 3
Skills
There is no clear orientation on the development
14 14 70 3
of ACR skills
Program is geared towards passing the CPA
13 13 65 5
Board exam
There is no formal course/subject on research. 8 8 40 6
Communication skills development is not
6 6 30 7
specifically part of the accountancy curriculum
There is no formal course/subject on academic or
6 6 30 7
technical writing.
Research skills development is specifically part
4 4 20 9
of the accountancy curriculum
Analytical skills development is not specifically
1 1 5 10
part of the accountancy curriculum

Total 99 100 495


Note. 4 missing cases.
a
n = 20.
Table 12 shows that Accountancy teachers perceive the number one factor why the

ACR skills of students are not being developed or adequately being developed is because

students fail to maximize the use of school facilities to help improve their ACR skills. It

is surprising to note that one teacher perceive that analytical skill is not adequately being

developed because it is not specifically part of the accountancy curriculum. With the

limited data available, as only 20 out of 24 teacher respondents answered this survey

item, it is possible that teachers, having facilitated classroom learning, expect students to

excel the effort in completing the learning process. It is also highly likely that four

teachers do not perceive that ACR skills are not being developed among Accountancy

students and for this reason, they did not respond to the survey question.

Morgan, Sneed, and Swinney (1999) argued that accounting firms have been

complaining about the decline in the abilities of accounting graduates. This may be due to

the following reasons: (1) the accounting curricula’s failure to adapt to the current

business environment; (2) best students leave the accounting program to pursue other

degrees; and (3) the student’s lack of motivation to study.

Table 13 provides the frequency and percentages of students and teachers who ranked

the three skills in the order of importance. As can be seen from the data on the table,

both groups agree that ranking is not important, that is, all three skills are perceived to

have equal weights according to importance. It can be deduced that students and teachers

may believe each of the skills complement each other and each skill needs to be

developed in order to be successful in the accounting profession.


Table 13

Students and Teacher Ranking of ACR Skills According to Importance

Students Teachers Total


Ranking
f % f % f %
All three are equally
121 61.4 12 54.6 133 60.7
important
First: Analytical
Second: Communication 43 21.8 7 31.9 50 22.8
Third: Research
First: Analytical
Second: Research 18 9.2 1 4.5 19 8.7
Third: Communication
First: Communication
Second: Analytical 12 6.1 1 4.5 13 5.9
Third: Research
First: Communication
Second: Research 1 0.5 1 0.5
Third: Analytical
First: Research
Second: Communication 2 1.0 1 4.5 3 1.4
Third: Analytical
First: Research
Second: Analytical
Third: Communication
na 197a 100.0 22b 100.0 219 100.0
a
Number of students out of 212 who ranked the skills with 9 having no answer and 6 considered invalid.
b
Number of teachers out of 24 who ranked the skills with 2 considered invalid.
CHAPTER 5

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CONCLUSIONS

From the data and results gathered for this study, the following conclusions are

presented.

1. Based on the perceptions of students, it can be concluded that the alternative

hypotheses for all analytical skill items except on-the-job training are accepted

due to the presence of highly significant correlation with the general evaluation of

analytical skills. However, for faculty members’ perceptions, only business cases,

ability to conclude and recommend based on analysis, design of theoretical

questions discouraging memorization, and ability to evaluate and interpret

financial systems indicate significant correlation with the general evaluation of

analytical skills. Hence, the alternative hypotheses for the aforementioned items

are accepted.

2. As perceived by both accountancy students and faculty members, problem solving

is the number one tool in the development of analytical skill as evidenced by high

mean scores. In contrast, students believe that both on-the-job training and flow

chart preparation has the lowest analytical skills development while teachers

consider only on-the-job training as the lowest.


3. The alternative hypothesis that analytical skills in general are developed/being

developed in accounting education is accepted. This can be attributed to the high

mean scores which is approximately 3.6 for both groups.

4. Based on the perceptions of students, it can be concluded that alternative

hypotheses related to all items under oral communication skills, all items in

written communication skills except writing essays, all items in non-verbal

communication and listening skills are accepted due to highly significant

correlation of these items with the general evaluation on the development of

communication skills. For faculty members, only class reporting, graded

recitation, debates, and essays are communication skill items that are highly

significant with the development of communication skills, while open forum and

feedback possess statistical significance with the development of communication

skills.

5. As perceived by students, class reporting is the number one tool in the

development of oral communication skills, while debates on accounting issues

have the lowest oral communication skill development. Faculty members perceive

asking clear and relevant questions the greatest while open forum with lecturers

and practitioners the least oral communication skill development. Both students

and faculty members perceive written reports to be the utmost factor in written

communication skills development, while writing essays are the least factor in the

development of written communication skill. Both students and faculty members


perceive that personal appearance is the number one factor in non-verbal

communication skill. However, posture is the least factor for students while facial

expression goes for faculty members in the development of non-verbal

communication skills. Lastly, students and faculty members perceive that

listening and taking notes at the same time greatly contributes to the development

of listening skills. On the contrary, while faculty perceive mere listening to be the

least contributor, students perceive giving feedback the least in the development

of listening skills.

6. The alternative hypothesis that communication skills in general are

developed/being developed in accounting education is accepted, although students

have lower perception scores than faculty members.

7. Based on the perceptions of students, all items under research skills are highly

significant in the development of research skills. Conversely, Faculty members

perceive only basic research, formal course in research methods, industry studies,

and feasibility studies as highly significant in the development of research skills.

Use of references and ability to link data are merely significant in the

development of the skill.

8. As perceived by students, the awareness on plagiarism is the greatest tool in the

development of research skills, while faculty members perceive reference to other


school materials to be the greatest. Nevertheless, both agree that feasibility studies

are the least in the development of research skills.

9. The alternative hypothesis that research skills in general are developed/being

developed in accounting education is accepted, as evidenced by higher mean

scores over the two skills.

10. As perceived by students, Mandatory CPE Programs have high significance with

the general development of ACR skills; thus, we accept the alternative hypotheses

for students. Faculty members show no high level of significance of CPE

Programs to the development of ACR skills, leading to the acceptance of the null

hypothesis. While both students and faculty members perceive analytical skills as

the primary developed skill in CPE Programs, Communication skills rank the

least as perceived by students, in contrast with the research skills perceived by

faculty members.

11. As perceived by students, communication skills development have a significant

relationship with the belief that ACR skills are developed more through

experience than classroom learning. Other skills show no statistical significance.

For faculty members, only research skills development is significant when related

to this belief; thus the study accepts the null hypothesis for other skills

development.
12. Based on the perceptions of students, De La Salle University helps in the

development of ACR skills, with highly significant relationship with the

development of the skills; hence we accept the alternative hypotheses for students.

Faculty members perceive that there is no statistical significance in the correlation

of the involvement of DLSU and the development of ACR skills.

13. It can be concluded that both students and faculty members do not place any

ranking importance to all the three skills being investigated. Majority of them

indicated that all three skills are equally important. The null hypothesis therefore

accepted.

RECOMMENDATIONS

In view of the research findings, discussions, and conclusions, the following

recommendations are presented, especially for future research:

1. Formulate academic policies, procedures, and guidelines toward the

enhancement of ACR skills development among accounting students. Such

programs should be geared toward the advancement of future CPAs not only on

technical knowledge but also on the development of other skills like ACR skills

which are also necessary for advancement in the profession. However, ample time
should be needed for conceptual planning of these development programs prior to

its actual implementation.

2. Assess the development of other major skills needed in developing competent

CPAs. Though the study was limited to the development of ACR skills, future

research might delve on assessing other major skills in producing competent

CPAs. Such skills include technical skills, technology skills, interpersonal skills,

and negotiation skills. These skills are necessary for CPAs to become more

competitive and able to provide quality service.

3. Increase the geographical scope of the study. Since the study utilized only the

perceptions obtained from the Accountancy students and faculty members of De

La Salle University, it should be noted that the total perceptions of DLSU students

and faculty members may still need to be truly represented by including the

perception of other schools offering the BSA program. Hence, there should be an

increase in the geographical scope of the study. It should extend to accounting

schools in Metro Manila, or in a regional perspective, then perhaps on a national

scope.

4. Increase the scope of respondents. Because the study is limited only to

Accountancy students and faculty members, future research should be geared

towards the inclusion of accounting practitioners, regardless of their school

affiliation. In this way, the research would have a better and clearer view of what
skills are demanded from aspiring CPAs who are ready to join the ranks of the

profession.

5. Consider other skill items not covered in the study. More than the skill items

presented in the study, it can be inferred that there are some other skill areas that

may be considered for future correlations with the general evaluations of ACR

skills. These skill areas may include innovative thinking, openness to constructive

changes, preparation of position papers, and writing over a broad range of

contexts, total recall/summary of previous lessons, researcher traits, reviews and

corporate strategies, and a host of other skill areas.


References

American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. (1997). Case study: Benchmarking at

Moss Adams. Retrieved February 21, 2006 from http://www.aicpa.org/pubs/jofa/

july97/elbench.htm

American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. (1999). Broad business perspective

competencies. Retrieved February 21, 2006 from http://www.aicpa.org/edu/

bbfin.htm

American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. (2004). AICPA core competency

framework for entry into the accounting profession. Retrieved March 3, 2006

from http://www.aicpa.org/edu/corecomp.htm

Anonymous. (1982). Does accounting education meet the needs of the profession?

Massachusetts CPA Review, 56 (2), 19.

Boldt, M. N. (2001, May/June). Assessing students’ accounting knowledge: A structural

approach. Journal of Education for Business, 76 (5), 262-270.

Burnett, S. (2003, January/February). The future of accounting education: A regional

perspective. Journal of Education for Business, 78 (3), 129-134.

Commission on Higher Education. (2006). Revised Minimum Circular Requirements for

Bachelor of Science in Accountancy. Pasig City, Philippines: Author.

Danziger, E. (1997). Writing in plain English. Journal of Accountancy, 184 (1), 74-77.

Dow, K. J. & Feldmann, D. A. (1994, Winter). Educating future CPAs: A survey of

accounting professors. Massachusetts CPA Review Boston, 68 (1), 17-27.


Dresnack, W. & Strieter, J. (2005). The effectiveness of the 150-hour requirement. The

CPA Journal, 75 (4), 64-66.

Edralin, D. (2002). Business research: Concepts and applications. Manila, Philippines:

De La Salle University Press.

Fowler, E. M. (1989, May 2). Careers: Building a better accountant. New York Times,

p. D-23.

Hussain, I., Al-Darayseh, M., & D Ouville, E. (1994). Accounting curriculum in the

twenty first century as viewed by CPAs. Management Research News, 17 (10),

51-58.

Jenkins, E. (1998). The significant role of critical thinking in predicting auditing

students’ performance. Journal of Education for Business, 73 (5), 274-280.

Jones, S. M. & Duncan, W. A. (1995). Teaching the introductory tax course: A new

paradigm. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 17 (1), 95.

Kealey, B., Holland, J., & Watson, M. (2005). Preliminary evidence on the association

between critical thinking and performance in principles of accounting. Issues in

Accounting Education, 20 (1), 33-49.

Khani, P., Edwards, J., Read, W., Pope, R., & Freeman, J. (1994). Focus on accounting

education. Journal of Accountancy, 177 (6), 44-45.

Larkin, J. (1994). What does it take to succeed in public accounting? Students speak out.

Pennsylvania CPA Journal, 65 (5), 20-22.

Levine, M. & Wright, P. (1987). Testing transferability of a self-developed teaching

effectiveness measure across College of Business. The Journal of Higher

Education, 58 (1), 85-100.


Lon Addams, H. (1981, May). Should the big 8 teach communication skills?

Management Accounting, 62 (11), 37.

May, C. & Menelaides, S. (1993). Good writing counts. Journal of Accountancy, 175 (7),

77-79.

Madison, R. M. (1990). Perspectives on education: Big eight CEO’s speak with one

voice. The Woman CPA, 52 (1), 25-28.

Maupin, R. & May, C. (1993). Communication for accounting students. The

International Journal of Educational Management, 7 (3), 30-38.

Morgan, D., Sneed, J., & Swinney, L. (1999). Faculty perceptions of the quality of

accounting students. Journal of Accounting and Finance Research, 6 (2), 81-85.

Mustafa, S. & Chiang, D. (2006). Dimensions of quality in higher education: How

academic performance affects university students' teacher evaluations. Journal of

American Academy of Business, 8 (1), 294-303.

Myers, R. (2005, October). Accounting education changes course. Journal of

Accountancy New York, 200 (4), 108-113.

Pearson, M. A. (1995). Better-prepared accounting graduates. The Practicing CPA, 19,

6-8.

Philippine Institute of Certified Public Accountants. (2005). Continuing professional

education requirments for CPAs. Retrieved March 11, 2006 from http://www.

picpa.com.ph

Prober, L. M. (2004, Winter). Business analysis for the accounting curriculum.

Pennsylvania CPA Journal, 74 (4), 24.


Reinstein, A. & Trebby, J. (1997, November/December). How accounting educators can

help improve their students’ writing skills. Journal of Education for Business, 73

(2), 105-113.

Schafersman, S. (1991). An introduction to critical thinking. Retrieved February 21, 2006

from http://www.freeinquiry.com/critical_thinking_html

Sneed, J. & Morgan, D. (1999). Evaluating the verbal, quantitative, and problem-solving

skills of students entering the accounting curriculum. Management Research

News, 22 (4), 22-28.

Sriram, R. & Coppage, R. (1992). A comparison of educators and CPA practitioners’

views on communication training in the accounting curriculum. Journal of

Applied Business Research, 8 (3), 1.

Stone, M. (2000). What will we teach? Accounting Education News, pp. 1-3.

Sutherland, T. (2004). Defining and avoiding plagiarism: The council of writing program

administrators’ statement on best practices. Accounting Education News, 32 (1/2),

5-8.

Usoff, C. & Feldmann, D. (1998). Accounting students’ perceptions of important skills

for career success. Journal of Education for Business, 73 (4), 215-219.

Williams, D. (1993). Reforming accounting education. Journal of Accountancy, 176 (2),

76-81.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen