Rubric Summary

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
2nd Floor OZ Building

900 San Marcelino Street, Ermita, Manila 1000
Phone (632) 524.20.11 local 407
ASSESSMENT RUBRICS FOR CE PROJECT 1
STUDENT NAME: ALCANTARA, QUEENCESS GLAZEL P., BARREDO, MAICA U., BATARAO, LEZTER LUISITO P. JR.
THESIS PROPOSAL TITLE: EFFECTS OF ANIMAL HAIR IN THE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF CLAY PAVEMENT BRICKS
NAME OF EVALUATOR: DR. MARIA CECILIA M. MARCOS SIGNATURE OF EVALUATOR: _______________________ DATE: NOVEMBER 10, 2019
RANKING: On scale from 1 (lowest performance) to 4 (highest performance), assign points to each dimension based on the criteria below
PERFORMANCE Exemplary Capable Developing Beginning EQUIV
STUDENT OUTCOMES COURSE OUTCOMES CRITERIA SCORE
INDICATOR (4) (3) (2) (1) WEIGHT
Ability to design a
Completes designing
system, component, Create a programme
process according to the Completes designing Completes Does not
or process to meet of research and Design
task description; process according to the designing process, complete any
3 70
desired needs within identify Completion
appropriate develops design task description. but needs revisions. process design
realistic constraints Design process to (10%)
such as economic, meet desired research strategies
c environmental, social, 2 needs within CO1 questions and
Develops and applies Includes only minor
political, ethical, realistic how they might
solutions that Develops a solution that or cursory No consideration
health and safety, constraints. be addressed by
Constraints includes economic, includes economic, consideration of of economics,
manufacturability, and particular
sustainability, in methodological
(5%) safety, environmental and safety, environmental and economic, safety, safety, and 3 70
accordance with other realistic other realistic constraints. and environmental environment.
approaches.
standards constraints. constraints
Create a programme Insufficient
Adequate identification of Partial identification
of research and Identification Clear and complete identification of
problem; any lack of of problems; lack of
identify of Problems identification of design
specific does not impair specific does impair
problems, 3 70
appropriate (10%) goals and objectives inadequately
Create solution solution or design solution of design
Ability to identify, research objectives.
strategies to solve
e formulate, and solve 4 CO1 questions and
civil engineering Has some strategies
engineering problems how they might Has no coherent
problems. Formulates a number of for problem-
be addressed by Strategy
strategies and apply to
Formulates strategies
solving, but does
strategies for 3 70
particular (5%) for solving problems problem
solve problems not apply them
methodological solving
consistently
approaches.
f Understanding of 3 Select an CO2 Have a critical Ethics Avoid plagiarism, does not The team quoted nearby all The team did not There is evidence
professional and appropriate course awareness of (5%) use information without the source of information quote all the source of plagiarism
ethical responsibility of action to make issues relating to giving credit to the that they used of information that
judgment on research appropriate source they used
ethical and reliability and
3 70
Phone (632) 524.20.11 local 407
validity, and
professional
ethical
dilemmas.
considerations.
Information is Work is hard to
Sequence of
presented in a Information is presented follow as there is
information is
Organization logical, interesting in a logical manner, which very little
difficult to follow;
& way, which is easy is easily followed; At ease continuity;
No grasp of
Content of to follow; Demonstration with content and able to Uncomfortable
information.
Manuscript of full knowledge of elaborate and with content.
Clearly no
3 70
Prepare written (10%) the subject with explain to some Only basic concepts
knowledge of
documents explanations and degree. are demonstrated
subject matter;
1 according to elaboration. and interpreted.
technical
specifications. Format is consistent Format is generally
Format Throughout including consistent including
Mostly consistent
& heading styles and heading styles and Work is illegible,
format. Figures and
Aesthetics of captions. Figures and captions. Figures and format changes
Manuscript tables are presented tables are neatly done
tables are legible,
throughout.
3 70
Prepare a research but not convincing.
paper and deliver an (5%) logically and reinforce and provide intended
Ability to the text. information.
oral presentation on
g communicate CO3 Incorrect
effectively the research pronunciation of
outcomes. Occasional
Delivery and Clear voice and correct, Voice is clear and at a terms. Voice level
mispronunciation
Speaking precise pronunciation of proper level. Most words too low or too
Skills of the terms. Good eye contact, Pronounced correctly.
of terms. Little eye
high.
4 100
contact, uneven
Presenters steady rate, enthusiasm, Some eye contact, steady Monotonous, no
rate, only little
(10%) confidence rate, excessively rehearsed eye contact, rate
expression
Deliver oral of speech too fast
presentations to or too slow
2
articulate concepts Sometimes
Does not listen
and ideas. Listening Listens carefully and Listens carefully and misunderstands
carefully
and responds to questions responds to questions questions, does not
to questions,
Response to appropriately; is able appropriately; is able respond
Questions of to explain and to explain and appropriately to
unable to 4 100
answer questions
the interpret results for interpret results for the audience, or has
about
Presenters various audiences various audiences some
presentation
(5%) and purposes and purposes trouble answering
material
questions
Broad education Explain the Search and
necessary to significance of critically evaluate Information is
Information is gathered Information is
understand the impact engineering relevant Literature Information is gathered gathered from a
from multiple, research- gathered from a
h of engineering 1 solutions in a CO4 literature and Search
solutions in a global, global, economic, engage with a (10%) based sources.
from multiple sources. limited number of
single source. 4 100
sources.
economic, environmental, range of data
environmental, and and societal collection
Phone (632) 524.20.11 local 407
context.
societal context methods.
Apply civil Search and

engineering critically evaluate
principles in relevant Has broad and in depth
Current Has knowledge of current Has some Has no clue about
Knowledge of consideration of literature and knowledge of current
j
contemporary issues
2
current issues
CO4
engage with a
Issues
issues in the engineering
issues in the engineering knowledge of issues in 4 100
(5%) discipline and in society current issues the world
affecting range of data discipline and in society;
engineering collection
practice. methods.
Is not able to
Is somewhat able to
Select techniques Is able to fully interpret interpret and
Ability to use Demonstrate Is able to interpret and interpret and
and modern and understand understand
techniques, skills, and specialist skills in understand information understand
engineering tools Skills information information from
k modern engineering 2
necessary for civil
CO5 the analysis of
(10%) from a variety of
from a variety of information from a
a
3 70
tools necessary for quantitative and techniques, skills and variety
engineering techniques, skills and variety of
engineering practice qualitative data. tools of techniques, skills
practice. tools techniques, skills
and tools
and tools
Knowledge and Student build cohesion in Student behavior brings Plans and procedures Student apathy
understanding of group through verbal and sometimes cohesion in followed during the negatively affects
engineering and Apply engineering nonverbal behavior. Takes group. Sporadic jokes and project. Goals groups
management and management an active role to encourage pranks encourage accomplished; most performance.
principles as a principles to
Manage to work in a
Teamwork participation of all team participation of team milestone met; Group cohesion is 4 100
l 2 CO6 team of student
member and leader in accomplish a (10%) members. members misses some broken by non
researchers.
a team, to manage group activity as deadlines verbal behavior.
projects and in member or leader.
multidisciplinary
environments
TOTAL 86.5
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Score Equivalent Grade Score Equivalent Grade Score Equivalent Grade
1 10 2.1 43 3.1 73 Interpretation:
1.1 13 2.2 46 3.2 76 (1.0-1.9) Does not meet expectations, FAILED
1.2 16 2.3 49 3.3 79 (2.0-2.9) Does not meet expectations but shows a little appreciation and learning of the activity, FAILED
.3 19 2.4 52 3.4 82 (3.0-3.3) Meet expectations shows a little appreciation and learning of the activity, PASSED
1.4 22 2.5 55 3.5 85 (3.4-3.7) Meet expectations shows appreciation and learning of the activity, PASSED
1.5 25 2.6 58 3.6 88 (3.8-4) Exceeds expectations, PASSED
1.6 28 2.7 61 3.7 91
1.7 31 2.8 64 3.8 94
1.8 34 2.9 67 3.9 97
1.9 37 3 70 4 100
2 40
Phone (632) 524.20.11 local 407
NAME OF EVALUATOR: ENGR. JEROME JORDAN F. FAMADICO SIGNATURE OF EVALUATOR: _______________________ DATE: NOVEMBER 10, 2019
Ability to design a
Create a programme Completes designing
system, component,
3 70
approaches.
Create a programme Insufficient
Adequate identification of Partial identification
of research and Identification Clear and complete identification of
problem; any lack of of problems; lack of
identify of Problems identification of design
problems, 3 70
appropriate (10%) goals and objectives inadequately
Create solution solution or design solution of design
Ability to identify, research objectives.
strategies to solve
e formulate, and solve 4 CO1 questions and
civil engineering Has some strategies
engineering problems how they might Has no coherent
problems. Formulates a number of for problem-
be addressed by Strategy
strategies and apply to
solving, but does
strategies for 3 70
particular (5%) for solving problems problem
solve problems not apply them
methodological solving
consistently
approaches.
Phone (632) 524.20.11 local 407
Have a critical
Select an
awareness of
appropriate course
issues relating to Avoid plagiarism, does not The team did not
Understanding of of action to make The team quoted nearby all
research Ethics use information without quote all the source There is evidence
f professional and 3 judgment on CO2
reliability and (5%) giving credit to the
the source of information
of information that of plagiarism
3 70
ethical responsibility ethical and that they used
validity, and appropriate source they used
professional
ethical
dilemmas.
considerations.
Information is Work is hard to
Sequence of
presented in a Information is presented follow as there is
information is
Organization logical, interesting in a logical manner, which very little
& way, which is easy is easily followed; At ease continuity;
No grasp of
information.
Clearly no
3 70
knowledge of
subject matter;
technical
Mostly consistent
format. Figures and
tables are legible,
throughout.
3 70
Prepare a research but not convincing.
paper and deliver an (5%) logically and reinforce and provide intended
Ability to the text. information.
oral presentation on
g communicate CO3 Incorrect
effectively the research pronunciation of
outcomes. Occasional
Delivery and Clear voice and correct, Voice is clear and at a terms. Voice level
mispronunciation
Speaking precise pronunciation of proper level. Most words too low or too
Skills of the terms. Good eye contact, Pronounced correctly.
of terms. Little eye
high.
3 70
contact, uneven
Presenters steady rate, enthusiasm, Some eye contact, steady Monotonous, no
rate, only little
(10%) confidence rate, excessively rehearsed eye contact, rate
expression
Deliver oral of speech too fast
presentations to or too slow
2
articulate concepts Sometimes
Does not listen
and ideas. Listening Listens carefully and Listens carefully and misunderstands
carefully
to questions,
unable to 3 70
answer questions
about
presentation
material
questions
Phone (632) 524.20.11 local 407
Explain the
Broad education significance of Search and
necessary to engineering critically evaluate Information is
understand the impact solutions in a relevant Information is gathered Information is
of engineering global, economic, literature and
Literature
from multiple, research-
Information is gathered gathered from a
gathered from a 3 70
h 1 CO4 Search from multiple sources. limited number of
solutions in a global, environmental, engage with a based sources. single source.
(10%) sources.
economic, and societal range of data
environmental, and context. collection

j
contemporary issues
2
current issues
CO4
engage with a
Issues
practice. methods.
Is not able to
Is somewhat able to
necessary for civil
CO5 the analysis of
a
3 70
and tools
and tools
Manage to work in a
researchers.
multidisciplinary
environments
TOTAL 70
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Phone (632) 524.20.11 local 407
1.6 28 2.7 61 3.7 91
1.7 31 2.8 64 3.8 94
1.8 34 2.9 67 3.9 97
1.9 37 3 70 4 100
2 40
NAME OF EVALUATOR: ENGR. ALBERT GRIÑO SIGNATURE OF EVALUATOR: _______________________ DATE: NOVEMBER 10, 2019
Ability to design a
Completes designing
system, component, Create a programme
3 70
approaches.
Insufficient
Create solution Create a programme Adequate identification of Partial identification
Ability to identify, Identification Clear and complete identification of
strategies to solve of research and problem; any lack of of problems; lack of
e formulate, and solve 4
civil engineering
CO1
identify
of Problems identification of design
problems, 2 40
engineering problems (10%) goals and objectives inadequately
problems. appropriate solution or design solution of design
objectives.
Phone (632) 524.20.11 local 407
research
questions and Has some strategies
Has no coherent
how they might
Strategy
Formulates a number of
for problem-
strategies for
2 40
be addressed by strategies and apply to solving, but does
(5%) for solving problems problem
particular solve problems not apply them
solving
methodological consistently
approaches.
Have a critical
Select an
awareness of
appropriate course
issues relating to Avoid plagiarism, does not The team did not
Understanding of of action to make The team quoted nearby all
research Ethics use information without quote all the source There is evidence
f professional and 3 judgment on CO2
reliability and (5%) giving credit to the
the source of information
of information that of plagiarism
2 40
ethical responsibility ethical and that they used
validity, and appropriate source they used
professional
ethical
dilemmas.
considerations.
g Ability to CO3 Prepare a research Information is Work is hard to
Sequence of
communicate paper and deliver an presented in a Information is presented follow as there is
information is
effectively oral presentation on Organization logical, interesting in a logical manner, which very little
the research & way, which is easy is easily followed; At ease continuity;
No grasp of
outcomes. information.
Clearly no
3 70
knowledge of
subject matter;
technical
Mostly consistent
format. Figures and
tables are legible,
throughout.
3 70
but not convincing.
(5%) logically and reinforce and provide intended
the text. information.
2 Deliver oral Delivery and Clear voice and correct, Voice is clear and at a Occasional Incorrect
presentations to Speaking precise pronunciation of proper level. Most words mispronunciation pronunciation of
articulate concepts Skills of the terms. Good eye contact, Pronounced correctly. of terms. Little eye terms. Voice level
and ideas. Presenters steady rate, enthusiasm, Some eye contact, steady contact, uneven too low or too
(10%) confidence rate, excessively rehearsed rate, only little high.
3 70
expression Monotonous, no
eye contact, rate
of speech too fast
or too slow
Phone (632) 524.20.11 local 407
Sometimes
Does not listen
Listening Listens carefully and Listens carefully and misunderstands
carefully
to questions,
unable to 2 40
answer questions
about
presentation
material
questions
Explain the
Broad education significance of Search and
necessary to engineering critically evaluate Information is
understand the impact solutions in a relevant Information is gathered Information is
of engineering global, economic, literature and
Literature
from multiple, research-
Information is gathered gathered from a
gathered from a 3 70
h 1 CO4 Search from multiple sources. limited number of
solutions in a global, environmental, engage with a based sources. single source.
(10%) sources.
economic, and societal range of data
environmental, and context. collection

j
contemporary issues
2
current issues
CO4
engage with a
Issues
practice. methods.
Is not able to
Is somewhat able to
necessary for civil
CO5 the analysis of
a
3 70
and tools
and tools
Manage to work in a
researchers.
multidisciplinary
environments
Phone (632) 524.20.11 local 407
TOTAL 59.5
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1.6 28 2.7 61 3.7 91
1.7 31 2.8 64 3.8 94
1.8 34 2.9 67 3.9 97
1.9 37 3 70 4 100
2 40
AUTHORS: ALCANTARA, QUEENCESS GLAZEL P., BARREDO, MAICA U., BATARAO, LEZTER LUISITO P. JR.
NO. PANEL NAME REMARKS
1 DR. MARIA CECILIA M. MARCOS  Related literature in the strength of animal hair.
 Provide literature on the statistics of animal hair waste issue in the introduction.
 Based your ratio 0-2.25 on ASTM and not just from the literature.
 Specification of clay bricks i.e low density, high density, etc.
 Revise table 3.1, provide detailed data
 Hair length?
 Percent by weight or volume?
 Compare two hair type
 Treated/Untreated? Dog? Cat?
2 ENGR. JEROME JORDAN F. FAMADICO  How much per year is the production of animal hair?
 Remove table in RRL/Chapter two, must be descriptive only
Phone (632) 524.20.11 local 407
 Fiber size?
 Sample per animal?
 Explain how statistical analysis will be used in your study.
 Water absorption of hair?
3 ENGR. ALBERT GRIÑO  Revise and simplify the research framework
 Justification for the 0-2.25 %
 Amount of clay, water and animal hair in batch formulation
 Significance of unpaired vs. paired t-test
ENDORSED BY:
ENGR. CRISPIN S. LICTAOA

ADVISER
AUTHORS: ALCANTARA, QUEENCESS GLAZEL P., BARREDO, MAICA U., BATARAO, LEZTER LUISITO P. JR.
COMMENTS & SUGGESTION
ENGR. ALBERT GRIÑO JR.
NUMBERS PARTICULARS REMARKS
1. Revise and simplify the research framework
2. Justification for the 0-2.25 %
3. Amount of clay, water and animal hair in batch formulation
4. Significance of unpaired vs. paired t-test

Phone (632) 524.20.11 local 407
DR. MARIA CECILIA MARCOS
Related literature in the strength of animal hair.

1.
Provide literature on the statistics of animal hair waste issue in

2.
the introduction.
Based your ratio 0-2.25 on ASTM and not just from the
3.
literature.
4. Revise table 3.1, provide detailed data
5. Hair length?
Phone (632) 524.20.11 local 407
6. Compare two hair type
ENGR. JEROME P. FAMADICO
How much per year is the production of animal hair?

1.
Remove table in RRL/Chapter two, must be descriptive only

2.
3. Fiber size?
4. Explain how statistical analysis will be used in your study.
5 Water absorption of hair?
ENDORSED BY:
Phone (632) 524.20.11 local 407
ENGR. CRISPIN S. LICTAOA

ADVISER

Rubric Summary

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Rubric Summary

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

2nd Floor OZ Building

Apply civil Search and

ASSESSMENT RUBRICS FOR CE PROJECT 1

Apply civil Search and

ASSESSMENT RUBRICS FOR CE PROJECT 1

Apply civil Search and

NO. PANEL NAME REMARKS

ENGR. CRISPIN S. LICTAOA

COMMENTS & SUGGESTION

ENGR. ALBERT GRIÑO JR.

NUMBERS PARTICULARS REMARKS

1. Revise and simplify the research framework

2. Justification for the 0-2.25 %

3. Amount of clay, water and animal hair in batch formulation

4. Significance of unpaired vs. paired t-test

DR. MARIA CECILIA MARCOS

NUMBERS PARTICULARS REMARKS

Related literature in the strength of animal hair.

Provide literature on the statistics of animal hair waste issue in

4. Revise table 3.1, provide detailed data

6. Compare two hair type

ENGR. JEROME P. FAMADICO

NUMBERS PARTICULARS REMARKS

How much per year is the production of animal hair?

Remove table in RRL/Chapter two, must be descriptive only

4. Explain how statistical analysis will be used in your study.

5 Water absorption of hair?

ENGR. CRISPIN S. LICTAOA

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen