Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Expenses
Fixed Expenses 2006 2007 2008 2009
Executive Salaries $190,000 $191,000 $195,000 $195,000
Advertising $50,000 $51,500 $53,045 $54,636
Auto & Truck Expenses $30,000 $30,900 $31,827 $32,782
Depreciation $5,000 $5,150 $45,305 $50,464
Employee Benefits $3,000 $3,090 $3,183 $3,278
Home Office Business Expenses $1,000 $1,030 $1,061 $1,093
Insurance $3,906 $3,754 $4,010 $3,994
Bank Charges $2,133 $2,197 $2,263 $2,331
Legal & Professional Services $1,000 $1,330 $1,670 $2,020
Meals & Entertainment $4,000 $4,120 $4,244 $4,371
Office Expense $6,000 $6,180 $6,365 $6,556
Retirement Plans $1,000 $1,030 $1,061 $1,093
Rent - Equipment $3,000 $3,090 $3,183 $3,278
Rent - Office & Business Property $8,750 $9,110 $9,544 $9,929
Repairs $1,000 $1,030 $1,061 $1,093
Supplies $1,000 $1,030 $1,061 $1,093
Taxes - Business & Payroll $1,000 $1,030 $1,061 $1,093
Travel $6,230 $6,120 $6,010 $5,900
Utilities $11,974 $12,374 $14,186 $16,974
Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Fixed Expenses $329,993 $335,065 $385,138 $396,977
Expense Data
Direct labor $300,000 $315,000 $330,450 $346,364
Other payroll $90,000 $102,700 $112,368 $118,647
Payroll taxes $18,000 $18,540 $19,096 $19,669
Insurance $3,906 $3,754 $4,010 $3,994
Legal/accounting $1,000 $1,330 $1,670 $2,020
Office overhead $43,000 $46,875 $47,970 $51,249
INCOME STATEMENT
Forecasted Total
2006 2007 2008 2009 4 Periods
Sales
Sales $1,960,000 $2,500,000 $2,651,800 $3,205,454 $10,317,254
Cost of sales $745,000 $871,350 $894,301 $915,467 $3,426,118
Expenses
Operating expenses $508,760 $532,287 $594,797 $618,071 $2,253,915
Interest $16,250 $16,738 $17,240 $17,757 $67,984
Depreciation $32,500 $33,475 $34,479 $35,514 $135,968
Amortization $1,250 $1,288 $1,326 $1,366 $5,230
Total expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Dividends paid $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Cost of sales
Direct labor $300,000 $315,000 $330,450 $346,364 $1,291,814
Materials $320,000 $427,600 $431,238 $432,513 $1,611,351
Other costs $125,000 $128,750 $132,613 $136,591 $522,953
BALANCE SHEET
Actual Forecast
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents $451,000 $451,000 $464,530 $478,466 $492,820
Accounts receivable $350,000 $350,000 $460,500 $871,315 $1,382,454
Notes receivable $0 $1,200 $3,200 $3,000 $3,400
Inventory $400,000 $400,000 $612,000 $824,360 $937,091
Other current assets $10,000 $10,000 $10,300 $10,609 $10,927
Total Current Assets $1,211,000 $1,212,200 $1,550,530 $2,187,750 $2,826,692
Fixed Assets
Land $100,000 $1,000,000 $1,030,000 $1,106,090 $1,109,273
Buildings $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,045,000 $1,591,350 $1,739,091
Equipment $800,000 $800,000 $824,000 $948,720 $874,182
Subtotal $2,400,000 $3,300,000 $2,899,000 $3,646,160 $3,722,545
Less-accumulated depreciation $400,000 $400,000 $412,000 $424,360 $437,091
Total Fixed Assets $2,000,000 $2,900,000 $2,487,000 $3,221,800 $3,285,454
Intangible Assets
Cost $50,000 $50,000 $51,500 $53,045 $54,636
Less-accumulated amortization $20,000 $20,000 $20,600 $21,218 $21,855
Total Intangible Assets $30,000 $30,000 $30,900 $31,827 $32,782
Actual Forecast
LIABILITIES AND 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable $590,000 $600,000 $618,000 $636,540 $640,563
Notes payable $100,000 $100,000 $103,000 $106,090 $109,273
Current portion of long-term debt $100,000 $100,000 $103,000 $106,090 $109,273
Income taxes $30,000 $30,000 $30,900 $31,827 $32,782
Accrued expenses $90,000 $90,000 $92,700 $95,481 $98,345
Other current liabilities $16,000 $16,000 $16,480 $16,974 $17,484
Total Current Liabilities $926,000 $936,000 $964,080 $993,002 $1,007,719
Non-Current Liabilities
Long-term debt $600,000 $601,200 $624,200 $645,630 $668,308
Deferred income $100,000 $100,000 $103,000 $106,090 $109,273
Deferred income taxes $30,000 $30,000 $30,900 $31,827 $32,782
Other long-term liabilities $50,000 $50,000 $51,500 $53,045 $54,636
Stockholders' Equity
Capital stock issued $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000
Additional paid in capital $50,000 $950,000 $678,500 $1,853,045 $2,469,710
Retained earnings $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,542,000 $1,685,260 $1,729,818
Other $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,560,000 $2,450,000 $2,320,500 $3,638,305 $4,299,528
Column Headings:
Depending upon your choice these headings
can Month, Quarter, or Year.
It is natural for a consultant to know where the log jams take place in the "revenues earned" stream and they usually
exist in one or more of 5 locations:
1. Captured Charges: Services that are provided and not captured as charges are one of the
largest sources of lost income for the medical industry.
2. Accurate Coding: The correct CPT code needs to be selected to accurately reflect the
services provided, and the appropriate ICD-9 code(s) assigned to justify the service.
3. Accurate Billing: Captured and correctly coded charges need to be sent to the appropriate payor
(an insurer or patient), along with accurate and correct patient demographic and insurance information.
4. Receivables Management: A system is needed to ensure that payments are received in the correct
amount and when expected.
5. Management, Financial, and Productivity Analysis: Systems are needed to calculate expected
and actual income, provide information on the productivity of the practice, and monitor the performance
of the business process.
Although mentioned last, item 5 is where the skilled consultant starts first. To identify exactly where to target their
efforts, a complete management, productivity, and financial analysis of the medical organization is mandatory. This is
where The Medical Director™ shines in that it "quickly clears the fog so you can see the landscape". You can choose
to post up to 12 financial periods for analysis.
The Medical Director™ is a Comprehensive Management, Financial, and Productivity Analysis System for:
1) Financial and Organizational Consultants
2) Practice Managers,
3) CFOs,
4) Product Manufacturers,
5) Supply Retailers,
6) Supply Wholesalers, and
7) Equipment Service & Repair firms.
© Copyright, 2017
Gross Profit $0 $0 $0 $0
Expenses
Fixed Expenses 2006 2007 2008 2009
Executive Salaries $0 $0 $0 $0
Advertising $0 $0 $0 $0
Auto & Truck Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0
Depreciation $0 $0 $0 $0
Employee Benefits $0 $0 $0 $0
Home Office Business Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0
Insurance $0 $0 $0 $0
Bank Charges $0 $0 $0 $0
Legal & Professional Services $0 $0 $0 $0
Meals & Entertainment $0 $0 $0 $0
Office Expense $0 $0 $0 $0
Retirement Plans $0 $0 $0 $0
Rent - Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0
Rent - Office & Business Property $0 $0 $0 $0
Repairs $0 $0 $0 $0
Supplies $0 $0 $0 $0
Taxes - Business & Payroll $0 $0 $0 $0
Travel $0 $0 $0 $0
Utilities $0 $0 $0 $0
Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Fixed Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0
Income taxes $0 $0 $0 $0
Net income $0 $0 $0 $0
Return On Ownership
Expense Data
Direct labor $0 $0 $0 $0
Other payroll $0 $0 $0 $0
Payroll taxes $0 $0 $0 $0
Insurance $0 $0 $0 $0
Legal/accounting $0 $0 $0 $0
Office overhead $0 $0 $0 $0
Financing Data (2006 on) Depreciation Capital Current Portion LT Portion Rate
Long term debt $0 $0 0.00%
Short-term debt $0 0.00%
Capital stock issued $0
Additional paid-in capital $0
Accumulated depreciation (as of 2005) $0
INCOME STATEMENT
Forecasted
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Sales
Sales $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Cost of sales $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Gross profit $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Expenses
Operating expenses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Interest $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Operating income $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Income taxes $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Net income $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Retained earnings-beginning $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Dividends paid $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Retained earnings-ending $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Cost of sales
Direct labor $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Materials $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Other costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
BALANCE SHEET
Actual Forecast
0 2006 2007 2008 2009
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Accounts receivable $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Inventory $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Other current assets $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Current Assets $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Fixed Assets
Land
Buildings $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Subtotal $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Less-accumulated depreciation $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Fixed Assets $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Intangible Assets
Cost
Less-accumulated amortization $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Intangible Assets $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Other assets
Total Assets $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Expense Data
Direct labor as % of sales 16.00% of sales $313,600 $400,000 $424,288 $512,873
Other payroll as % of sales 12.00% of sales $235,200 $300,000 $318,216 $384,654
Payroll taxes as % of payroll 10.00% of payroll $54,880 $70,000 $74,250 $89,753
Insurance as % of payroll 5.00% of payroll $27,440 $35,000 $37,125 $44,876
Legal/accounting as % of sales 2.00% of sales $39,200 $50,000 $53,036 $64,109
Office overhead as % of sales 3.00% of sales $58,800 $75,000 $79,554 $96,164
Investment transactions
Increases (decreases)
Land $12,500 $12,500 $12,500 $12,500
Buildings and improvements ($50,000) $0 $0 $0
Equipment $75,000 $0 $0 $0
Intangible assets $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0
Net cash from investments $37,500 $12,500 $12,500 $12,500
Financing transactions
Increases (decreases)
Short term notes payable ($50,000) $0 $0 $0
Long term debt ($100,000) $0 $0 $0
Deferred income ($10,000) $0 $0 $0
Deferred income taxes ($3,000) $0 $0 $0
Other long-term liabilities $40,000 ($50,000) $0 $0
Investment transactions
Increases (decreases)
Land $0 $0 $0 $0
Buildings and improvements $0 $0 $0 $0
Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0
Intangible assets $0 $0 $0 $0
Financing transactions
Increases (decreases)
Short term notes payable $0 $0 $0 $0
Long term debt $0 $0 $0 $0
Deferred income $0 $0 $0 $0
Deferred income taxes $0 $0 $0 $0
Other long-term liabilities $0 $0 $0 $0
Forecasted Total
2006 2007 2008 2009 4 Quarters
Cash from operations
Net earnings (loss) $484,491 $678,854 $775,686 $1,283,462 $3,222,493
Add-depreciation and amortization $33,750 $35,208 $35,208 $35,208 $139,374
Investment transactions
Increases (decreases)
Land $12,500 $12,500 $12,500 $12,500 $50,000
Buildings and improvements ($50,000) $0 $0 $0 ($50,000)
Equipment $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $75,000
Intangible assets $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Financing transactions
Increases (decreases)
Short term notes payable ($50,000) $0 $0 $0 ($50,000)
Long term debt ($100,000) $0 $0 $0 ($100,000)
Deferred income ($10,000) $0 $0 $0 ($10,000)
Deferred income taxes ($3,000) $0 $0 $0 ($3,000)
Other long-term liabilities $40,000 ($50,000) $0 $0 ($10,000)
Capital stock and paid in capital $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Net cash from operations $518,241 $714,062 $810,894 $1,318,670 $1,464,997 $1,714,808 $1,964,620 $2,214,432
Net cash from operations ($712,611) ($186,445) $69,705 ($88,358) $302,800 $515,691 $728,582 $941,473
Investment transactions
Increases (decreases)
Land $12,500 $12,500 $12,500 $12,500 $12,500 $12,500 $12,500 $12,500
Buildings and improvements ($50,000) $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $40,000 $55,000 $70,000
Equipment $75,000 $0 $0 $0 ($37,500) ($60,000) ($82,500) ($105,000)
Intangible assets $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Net cash from investments $37,500 $12,500 $12,500 $12,500 $0 ($7,500) ($15,000) ($22,500)
Financing transactions
Increases (decreases)
Short term notes payable ($50,000) $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $40,000 $55,000 $70,000
Long term debt ($100,000) $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $80,000 $110,000 $140,000
Deferred income ($10,000) $0 $0 $0 $5,000 $8,000 $11,000 $14,000
Deferred income taxes ($3,000) $0 $0 $0 $1,500 $2,400 $3,300 $4,200
Other long-term liabilities $40,000 ($50,000) $0 $0 ($20,000) ($27,000) ($34,000) ($41,000)
Net cash from financing ($123,000) ($50,000) $0 $0 $61,500 $103,400 $145,300 $187,200
Net increase (decrease) in cash ($354,870) $465,117 $868,099 $1,217,812 $1,829,297 $2,341,399 $2,853,502 $3,365,605
Cash at beginning of period $451,000 $96,130 $561,247 $1,429,346 $1,484,470 $1,824,485 $2,164,501 $2,504,516
Cash at the end of period $96,130 $561,247 $1,429,346 $2,647,158 $3,313,766 $4,165,884 $5,018,003 $5,870,121
$2,000
Revenue
Cost of Sales
$1,500 Gross Profit
Total Expenses
$1,000 Profit
Ownership
$500
$0
10 $1
9 $1
$1
8
$1
7
$1
6
$1
5 $0
4 $0
3 $0
2 $0
1 $0
0 0 6 0 7 08 09
2006 2007 2008 2009 20 20 20 20
Revenue
$1 $1 $1
$1 $1 $1
$1 $1 $1
$1 $1 $1
$1 $1 $1
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
© Copyright, 2009, The Vickers Company, All Rights Reserved.
REVENUE FIXED COSTS TOTAL COSTS
REVENUE FIXED COSTS TOTAL COSTS REVENUE FIXED COSTS TOTAL COSTS
Breakeven Period 1 Breakeven Period 2 Breakeven Period 3
$1 $1
Dashboard $1
Revenue
Revenue
$1 $1 $1
$1 $1 $1
$1 $1 For $1
$1 $1
$1
$1 $1
INDOPOWER $1
$0 $0 December 11, 2019 $0
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
Revenue
Revenue
$1 $1 $1
$1 $1 $1
$1 $1 $1
$1 $1 $1
$1 $1 $1
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
REVENUE FIXED COSTS TOTAL COSTS REVENUE FIXED COSTS TOTAL COSTS REVENUE FIXED COSTS TOTAL COSTS
Revenue
Revenue
Revenue
$1 $1 $1
$1 $1 $1
$1 $1 $1
$1 $1 $1
$1 $1 $1
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 The Vickers Company, All Rights Reserved.
© Copyright, 2009, $0
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
Breakeven Period 7 Dashboard
Breakeven Period 8 Breakeven Period 9
$1 $1
For $1
INDOPOWER
Revenue
Revenue
Revenue
$1 $1 $1
$1 $1 $1
$1 $1 December 11, 2019 $1
$1 $1 $1
$1 $1 $1
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
REVENUE FIXED COSTS TOTAL COSTS REVENUE FIXED COSTS TOTAL COSTS REVENUE FIXED COSTS TOTAL COSTS
Revenue
Revenue
Revenue
$1 $1 $1
$1 $1 $1
$1 $1 $1
$1 $1 $1
$1 $1 $1
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
REVENUE FIXED COSTS TOTAL COSTS REVENUE FIXED COSTS TOTAL COSTS REVENUE FIXED COSTS TOTAL COSTS
1200.00%
Breakeven Analysis Percentage - Summary
1000.00%
800.00%
© Copyright, 2009, The Vickers Company, All Rights Reserved.
600.00%
Dashboard
For
Breakeven Analysis Percentage - Summary
1200.00% INDOPOWER
December 11, 2019
1000.00%
800.00%
600.00%
400.00%
200.00%
0.00%
1 2 3 4
12.00
10.00
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
12.00
10.00
8.00 Dashboard
6.00 For
INDOPOWER
4.00 December 11, 2019
2.00
0.00
12.00
10.00
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
12.00
10.00
© Copyright, 2009, The Vickers Company, All Rights Reserved.
8.00
Dashboard
For
Z-Score Analysis - Nonmanufacturing
INDOPOWER
December 11, 2019
12.00
10.00
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
Executive Summary
Current vs. Projected
$2,500
$2,000
1. Net Revenue
$1,500 2. Cost of Revenue
3. Gross Profit
4. Total Operating Expens es
$1,000
5. Operating Profit
6. Return on Owners hip
$500
$0
1.20 1.20
1.00 1.00
0.80 0.80
0.60 0.60
0.40 0.40
0.20 0.20
0.00 0.00
2006 2007 2008 2009 2006 2007 2008 2009
Current Ratio Acid Test (Quick Ratio)
12.00 12.00
10.00 10.00
8.00 8.00
6.00 6.00
4.00 4.00
2.00 2.00
0.00 0.00
2006 2007 2008 2009 2006 2007 2008 2009
Receivables Turnover Days Sales in AR
12.00 12.00
10.00 10.00
8.00 8.00
© Copyright, 2009, The Vickers Company, All Rights Reserved.
6.00 6.00
4.00 4.00
2.00 2.00
Dashboard
For
INDOPOWER
December 11, 2019
12.00 12.00
10.00 10.00
8.00 8.00
6.00 6.00
4.00 4.00
2.00 2.00
0.00 0.00
2006 2007 2008 2009 2006 2007 2008 2009
Inventory Turnover Days Inventory
1200.00% 1200.00%
1000.00% 1000.00%
800.00% 800.00%
600.00% 600.00%
400.00% 400.00%
200.00% 200.00%
0.00% 0.00%
2006 2007 2008 2009 2006 2007 2008 2009
Gross Profit Percentage Net Profit Margin
100.00% 1200.00%
90.00%
80.00% 1000.00%
70.00% 800.00%
60.00%
50.00% 600.00%
40.00% © Copyright, 2009, The Vickers Company, All Rights Reserved.
30.00% 400.00%
20.00% 200.00%
10.00%
0.00% 0.00%
Dashboard
For
100.00%
INDOPOWER1200.00%
90.00% December 11, 2019
80.00% 1000.00%
70.00% 800.00%
60.00%
50.00% 600.00%
40.00%
30.00% 400.00%
20.00% 200.00%
10.00%
0.00% 0.00%
2006 2007 2008 2009 2006 2007 2008 2009
Return on Net Worth Return on Total As sets
Labor Expenses
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
2006 2007 2008 2009
© Copyright, 2009, The Vickers Company, All Rights Reserved.
For
Labor Expenses
INDOPOWER
December 11, 2019 $1
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
2006 2007 2008 2009
Profit
2009 © Copyright, 2009, The Vickers Company, All Rights Reserved.
2008.5
2008
2007.5
For
INDOPOWER
December 11, 2019
Profit
2009
2008.5
2008
2007.5
2007
2006.5
2006
2005.5
2005
2004.5
2006 2007 2008 2009
Breakeven Period 3
$1
Revenue
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
© Copyright, 2009, The Vickers Company, All Rights Reserved.
Revenue
$1
$1
For $1
$1
INDOPOWER $1
December 11, 2019 $0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Breakeven Period 6
$1
Revenue
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Breakeven Period 9
$1
Revenue
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
$0
$0 © Copyright, 2009, The Vickers Company, All Rights Reserved.
$0
$0
$0
Breakeven Period 9
For $1
INDOPOWER
Revenue
$1
$1
December 11, 2019 $1
$1
$1
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Breakeven Period 12
$1
Revenue
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
3 4
For
INDOPOWER
December 11, 2019
e Analysis - Nonmanufacturing
$2,500
$2,000
Revenue
Cost of Sales
$1,500
Gros s Profit
Total Expenses
Profit
$1,000
Ownership
$500
$0
$500
$0
PT INDONESIA POWER
The Executive Summary of your business yields an overall picture of its financial health. We have extracted, compiled, and entered into our
analysis system all of the vital information that pertains to this specific business and yielded this summary. The primary objective is to zero in
on all of the areas that might be detracting from the bottom line.
Knowledge is power, and knowledge of your company's value is the ultimate power tool. Item 9 is the summary results of your Market Value
Analysis. The Market Value Analysis uses the 6 standard methods endorsed by The American Society of Appraisers.
Your Your
Current Forecasted
Year Year
Category 2006 2017 Comments
###
PERCENTAGE OF EVALUATION CATEGORIES THAT MAY NEED ASSISTANCE = #DIV/0! 0% to 20% is Best
Executive Summary
Current vs. Projected
1. Net Revenue
$2,500
2. Cost of Revenue
$2,000
3. Gross Profit
$1,500
4. Total Operating Expenses
$1,000
5. Operating Profit
$500
6. Return on Ownership
$0
2006 2017
PT INDONESIA POWER
Income Ratios
Profitability Ratios
Earnings Per Share (EPS) Ratio #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Liquidity Ratios
Acid Test (Quick Ratio) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Trend is Upward
Activity Ratios
Net Sales to Net Fixed Assets 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Trend is Upward
Amortization and Depreciation Expense to Net Sales N/A N/A N/A N/A Trend is Upward
Operating Expenses as % of Net Sales N/A N/A N/A N/A Trend is Upward
Income before tax to Net Worth 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Trend is Upward
Income before tax to Total Assets #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Current Liabilities to Net Worth (1.00) (1.00) (1.00) (1.00) Trend is Upward
Total Liabilities to Net Worth (Debt Ratio) -100.00% -100.00% -100.00% -100.00% Trend is Upward
Net Worth to Total Liabilities (1.00) (1.00) (1.00) (1.00) Trend is Upward
PAYROLL ANALYSIS
Investment transactions
Increases (decreases)
Land $0 $0 $0 $0 Trend is Upward
Buildings and improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 Trend is Upward
Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 Trend is Upward
Intangible assets $0 $0 $0 $0 Trend is Upward
Financing transactions
Increases (decreases)
Short term notes payable $0 $0 $0 $0 Trend is Upward
Long term debt $0 $0 $0 $0 Trend is Upward
Deferred income $0 $0 $0 $0 Trend is Upward
Deferred income taxes $0 $0 $0 $0 Trend is Upward
Other long-term liabilities $0 $0 $0 $0 Trend is Upward
Capital invested $0 $0 $0 $0 Trend is Upward
Summary Analysis
The Final Analysis Score is:
#DIV/0!
Flexakon uses "Data Funneling" to arrive at the Final Score. All of the worksheets in Flexakon contribute objective analyses. These results funnel to
the Summary Analysis worksheet where they are further analyzed and assigned individual scores. The total of all scores are common sized at 100%.
The final score reflects the sum of positive scores.
DEMO: Click back and forth on the "Troubled Firm" and "Prosperous Firm" buttons on the Master Data Entry worksheet while simultaneously viewing
Flexakon's summary analysis sheet.
Income Statement
Medical Manufacturer
Gross Profit $0 $0 $0 $0
Expenses
Fixed Expenses 2006 2007 2008 2009
Executive Salaries $0 $0 $0 $0
Advertising $0 $0 $0 $0
Auto & Truck Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0
Depreciation $0 $0 $0 $0
Employee Benefits $0 $0 $0 $0
Home Office Business Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0
Insurance $0 $0 $0 $0
Bank Charges $0 $0 $0 $0
Legal & Professional Services $0 $0 $0 $0
Meals & Entertainment $0 $0 $0 $0
Office Expense $0 $0 $0 $0
Retirement Plans $0 $0 $0 $0
Rent - Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0
Rent - Office & Business Property $0 $0 $0 $0
Repairs $0 $0 $0 $0
Supplies $0 $0 $0 $0
Taxes - Business & Payroll $0 $0 $0 $0
Travel $0 $0 $0 $0
Utilities $0 $0 $0 $0
Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Fixed Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0
Income taxes $0 $0 $0 $0
Return On Ownership $0 $0 $0 $0
Other assets $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Assets $0 $0 $0 $0
PT INDONESIA POWER
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4
Current Assets Inventory Other Assets Total Assets Current Liabilities
Non-current Liabilities Total Liabilities Equity
Expenses
Fixed Expenses
Executive Salaries $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Advertising $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Auto & Truck Expenses $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Depreciation $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Employee Benefits $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Home Office Business Expenses $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Insurance $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Bank Charges $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Variable Expenses
Office salaries $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Employee benefits $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Payroll taxes $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Sales and Marketing $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Telephone and telegraph $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Stationary and office supplies $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Bad debts $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Postage $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Contributions $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
biaya listrik $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
biaya bunga $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Add Item $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Add Item $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Add Item $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Total Variable Expenses $2,006 #DIV/0! $2,007 #DIV/0! $2,008 #DIV/0! $2,009 #DIV/0!
Operating income $2,006 #DIV/0! $2,007 #DIV/0! $2,008 #DIV/0! $2,009 #DIV/0!
PT INDONESIA POWER
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable $0 Err:522 $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Notes payable $0 Err:522 $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Current portion of long-term debt $0 Err:522 $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Income taxes $0 Err:522 $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Accrued expenses $0 Err:522 $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Other current liabilities $0 Err:522 $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Total Current Liabilities $2,006 Err:522 $2,007 #DIV/0! $2,008 #DIV/0! $2,009 #DIV/0!
Non-Current Liabilities
Long-term debt $0 Err:522 $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Deferred income $0 Err:522 $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Deferred income taxes $0 Err:522 $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Other long-term liabilities Err:522 Err:522 $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Total Liabilities $2,006 Err:522 $2,007 #DIV/0! $2,008 #DIV/0! $2,009 #DIV/0!
Stockholders' Equity
Capital stock issued $0 Err:522 $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Number of shares issued $0 Err:522 $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Additional paid in capital $0 Err:522 $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Retained earnings $0 Err:522 $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
Total Stockholders' Equity Err:522 Err:522 $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0! $0 #DIV/0!
PT INDONESIA POWER
Income Statement
Medical Manufacturer
Gross Profit $0 $0 $0 $0
Expenses
Fixed Expenses 2006 2007 2008 2009
Executive Salaries $0 $0 $0 $0
Advertising $0 $0 $0 $0
Auto & Truck Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0
Depreciation $0 $0 $0 $0
Employee Benefits $0 $0 $0 $0
Home Office Business Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0
Insurance $0 $0 $0 $0
Bank Charges $0 $0 $0 $0
Legal & Professional Services $0 $0 $0 $0
Meals & Entertainment $0 $0 $0 $0
Office Expense $0 $0 $0 $0
Retirement Plans $0 $0 $0 $0
Rent - Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0
Rent - Office & Business Property $0 $0 $0 $0
Repairs $0 $0 $0 $0
Supplies $0 $0 $0 $0
Taxes - Business & Payroll $0 $0 $0 $0
Travel $0 $0 $0 $0
Utilities $0 $0 $0 $0
Other Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Fixed Expenses $0 $0 $0 $0
Income taxes $0 $0 $0 $0
Net income $0 $0 $0 $0
PT INDONESIA POWER
Other assets $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Assets $0 $0 $0 $0
PT INDONESIA POWER
Bankruptcy prediction models are more generally known as measures of financial distress. The best-known,
and most-widely used, multiple discriminant analysis method is the one proposed by Edward Altman,
Professor of Finance at the Stern School of Business, New York University, The Z-Score Analysis or Zeta
Model. Despite the positive results of his study, Altman’s model had a key weakness: it assumed variables
in the sample data to be normally distributed. "If all variables are not normally distributed, the methods
employed may result in selection of an inappropriate set of predictors". Chistine Zavgren developed a
model that corrected for this problem. Her model used logit analysis to predict bankruptcy. Due to its use of
logit analysis, her model is considered "more robust". Further, logit analysis actually provides a probability
(in terms of a percentage) of bankruptcy. Also, the probability calculated might be considered a measure of
the effectiveness of management, i.e. effective management will not lead a company to the verge of
bankruptcy.
Application of the logit model requires four steps. First, a series of seven financial ratios are calculated.
Second, each ratio is multiplied by a coefficient unique to that ratio. This coefficient can be either positive or
negative. Third, the resulting values are summed together (y). Finally, the probability of bankruptcy for a
firm is calculated as the inverse of (1 + ey) where "e" is the base of natural logarithms."Explanatory
variables with a negative coefficient increase the probability of bankruptcy because they reduce ey toward
zero, with the result that the bankruptcy probability function approaches 1/1, or 100 percent. Likewise,
independent variables with a positive coefficient decrease the probability of bankruptcy".
Logit Analysis
Year Year Year Year
2006 2007 2008 2009
Constant 0.23883 0.23883 0.23883 0.23883
Inventories/Sales 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Receivables/Inventory 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Cash+Marketable Securities/Total Assets #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Quick Assets/Current Liabilities 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Income from CO/(Total Assets-Current Liab) -0.486 -0.486 -0.486 -0.486
Long-Term Debt/(Total Assets-Current Liab) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Sales/(Net Working Capital+Fixed Assets) #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Sum of Coefficients * Ratios #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Logit Analysis
1200.00%
1000.00%
800.00%
600.00%
400.00%
0.00%
Logit Analysis
1200.00%
1000.00%
200.00%
0.00%
1 2 3 4
PT INDONESIA POWER
Fulmer, John G. Jr., Moon, James E., Gavin, Thomas A., Erwin, Michael J., "A Bankruptcy Classification
Model For Small Firms". Journal of Commercial Bank Lending (July 1984): pp. 25-37.
Fulmer used step-wise multiple discriminate analysis to evaluate 40 financial ratios applied to a sample of
60 companies -30 failed and 30 successful. The average asset size of these firms was $455,000.
Fulmer reported a 98% accuracy rate in classifying the test companies one year prior to failure and an 81%
accuracy rate more than one year prior to bankruptcy.
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
2006 2007 2008 2009
PT INDONESIA POWER
Gordon L. V. Springate
This model was developed in 1978 at S.F.U. by Gordon L.V. Springate, following procedures developed by
Altman in the U.S. Springate used step-wise multiple discriminate analysis to select four out of 19 popular
financial ratios that best distinguished between sound business and those that actually failed.
D = Sales/Total Assets
This model achieved an accuracy rate of 92.5% using the 40 companies tested by Springate. Botheras
tested the Springate Model on 50 companies with an average asset size of $2.5 million and found an 88.0%
accuracy rate. Sands tested the Springate Model on 24 companies with an average asset size of $63.4
million and found an accuracy rate of 83.3%.
Analysis
Year Year Year Year
2006 2007 2008 2009
Working Capital/Total Assets #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Net Profit before interest and Taxes/Total Assets #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Net Profit before Taxes/Current Liabilities 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Springate Analysis
12.00
10.00
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
2006 2007 2008 2009
PT INDONESIA POWER
PT INDONESIA POWER
1000.00%
800.00%
600.00%
200.00%
1200.00%
1000.00%
800.00%
600.00%
400.00%
200.00%
0.00%
1 2 3 4
PT INDONESIA POWER
Where X.sub.4 = Market Value of Equity/Book Value of Debt. This ratio adds a market
dimension. Academic studies of stock markets suggest that security price changes may
foreshadow upcoming problems.
12.00
10.00
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
12.00
10.00
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
12.00
10.00
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
Category Ratio
Profitability ratios • Earnings Per Share
• Gross Profit Margin
• Net Profit Margin
• Return on Assets
• Return on Equity
Liquidity ratios • Current Ratio
• Quick Ratio
Activity ratios • Average Collection Period
• Inventory Turnover Ratio
Leverage ratios • Debt Ratio
• Equity Ratio
• Times Interest Earned Ratio
This is by no means an exhaustive list of the ratios that have been developed to help analyze a company's financial
position and the way that it conducts business. It is, however, representative.
But if you purchase the necessary printing equipment, you could make the business cards yourself. So doing would turn
a variable cost into a fixed cost: no matter how many cards you sell, the cost of printing them is fixed at however much
you paid for the printing equipment. The more cards you sell, the greater your profit margin. This effect is termed
operating leverage.
If you borrow money to acquire the printing equipment, you are using another type of leverage, termed financial
leverage. The cost is still fixed at however much money you must pay, at regular intervals, to retire the loan. Again, the
more cards you sell, the greater your profit margin. But if you do not sell enough cards to cover the loan payment, you
could lose money. In that case, it might be difficult to find funds either to make the loan payments or to cover your other
expenses. Your credit rating might fall, making it more costly for you to borrow other money.
Leverage is a financial tool that accelerates changes in income, both positive and negative. A company's creditors and
investors are interested in how much leverage has been used to acquire assets. From the standpoint of creditors, a high
degree of leverage represents risk because the company might not be able to repay a loan. From the investors'
standpoint, if the return on assets is less than the cost of borrowing money to acquire assets, then the investment is
unattractive. The investor could obtain a better return in different ways-one way would be to loan funds rather than to
invest them in the company.
Only occasionally can you calculate one of these indicators and gain immediate insight into a business operation. More
frequently, it is necessary to know the sort of business that a company conducts, because the marketplace imposes
different demands on different lines of business. Furthermore, you can usually understand one ratio by considering it in
the context of another ratio (the debt ratio and the return on assets is a good example of one ratio providing the context
for another).
Keep in mind that it's important to evaluate a financial ratio in terms of its trend over time, of a standard such as an
industry average, and in light of other ratios that describe the company's operations and financial structure.
0.20
PT INDONESIA POWER
0.00
2006 2007 2008 2009
rasio lancar
The current ratio compares a company's current assets (those that can be converted to cash
during the current accounting period) to its current liabilities (those liabilities coming due
during the same period). The usual formula is:
The current ratio measures the company's ability to repay the principal amounts of its
liabilities.
The current ratio is closely related to the concept of working capital. Working capital is the
difference between current assets and current liabilities.
Is a high current ratio good or bad? Certainly, from the creditor's standpoint, a high current
ratio means that the company is well-placed to pay back its loans. Consider, though, the
nature of the current assets: they consist mainly of cash and cash equivalents. Funds
invested in these types of assets do not contribute strongly and actively to the creation of
income. Therefore, from the standpoint of stockholders and management, a current ratio that
is very high means that the company's assets are not being used to best advantage.
0.20
PT INDONESIA POWER
0.00
2006 2007 2008 2009
The quick ratio shows whether a company can meet its liabilities from quickly-accessible
assets.
In practice, a quick ratio of 1.0 is normally considered adequate, with this caveat: the credit
periods that the company offers its customers and those granted to the company by its
creditor must be roughly equal. If revenues will stay in accounts receivable for as long as
90 days, but accounts payable are due within 30 days, a quick ratio of 1.0 will mean that
accounts receivable cannot be converted to cash quickly enough to meet accounts
payable.
It is possible for a company to manipulate the values of its current and quick ratios by
taking certain actions toward the end of an accounting period such as a fiscal year. It might
wait until the start of the next period to make purchases to its inventory, for example. Or, if
its business is seasonal, it might choose a fiscal year that ends after its busy season, when
© Copyright, 2009, The Vickers Company, All Rights Reserved.
inventories are usually low. As a potential creditor, you might want to examine the
company’s current and quick ratios on, for example, a quarterly basis.
creditor must be roughly equal. If revenues will stay in accounts receivable for as long as
90 days, but accounts payable are due within 30 days, a quick ratio of 1.0 will mean that
accounts receivable cannot be converted to cash quickly enough to meet accounts
payable.
It is possible for a company to manipulate the values of its current and quick ratios by
taking certain actions toward the end of an accounting period such as a fiscal year. It might
wait until the start of the next period to make purchases to its inventory, for example. Or, if
its business is seasonal, it might choose a fiscal year that ends after its busy season, when
inventories are usually low. As a potential creditor, you might want to examine the
company’s current and quick ratios on, for example, a quarterly basis.
Both a current and a quick ratio can also mislead you if the inventory figure does not
represent the current replacement cost of the materials in inventory. There are various
methods of valuing inventory. The LIFO method, in particular, can result in an inventory
valuation that is much different from the inventory's current replacement value; this is
because it assumes that the most recently acquired inventory is also the most recently
sold.
If your actual costs to purchase materials are falling, for example, the LIFO method could
result in an over-valuation of the existing inventory. This would tend to inflate the value of
the current ratio, and to underestimate the value of the quick ratio if you calculate it by
subtracting inventory from current assets, rather than summing cash and cash equivalents.
$2.00
PT INDONESIA POWER
$0.00
2006 2007 2008 2009
In either case, Earnings Per Share (EPS) is an important measure of the company's
income. Its basic formula is:
EPS = Income Available for Common Stock / Shares of Common Stock Outstanding
EPS is usually a poor candidate for vertical analysis, because different companies always
have different numbers of shares of stock outstanding. It may be a good candidate for
horizontal analysis, if you have access both to information about the company's income
and shares outstanding. With both these items, you can control for major fluctuations over
time in shares outstanding. This sort of control is important: it is not unusual for a company
to purchase its own stock on the open market to reduce the number of outstanding shares.
So doing increases the value of the EPS ratio, perhaps making the stock appear a more
attractive investment.
Note that the EPS can decline steadily throughout the year. Because, the number of shares
© Copyright, 2009, The Vickers Company, All Rights Reserved.
outstanding is constant throughout the year, the EPS changes are due solely to changes in
net income.
EPS is usually a poor candidate for vertical analysis, because different companies always
have different numbers of shares of stock outstanding. It may be a good candidate for
horizontal analysis, if you have access both to information about the company's income
and shares outstanding. With both these items, you can control for major fluctuations over
time in shares outstanding. This sort of control is important: it is not unusual for a company
to purchase its own stock on the open market to reduce the number of outstanding shares.
So doing increases the value of the EPS ratio, perhaps making the stock appear a more
attractive investment.
Note that the EPS can decline steadily throughout the year. Because, the number of shares
outstanding is constant throughout the year, the EPS changes are due solely to changes in
net income.
Many companies issue at least two different kinds of stock: common and preferred.
Preferred stock is issued under different conditions than common stock. Preferred stock is
often callable at the company's discretion, it pays dividends at a different (usually, higher)
rate per share, it might not carry voting privileges, and often has a higher priority than
common stock as to the distribution of liquidated assets if the company goes out of
business.
Calculating EPS for a company that has issued preferred stock introduces a slight
complication. Because the company pays dividends on preferred stock before any
distribution to shareholders of common stock, it is necessary to subtract these dividends
from net income:
200.0%
PT INDONESIA POWER
0.0%
2006 2007 2008 2009
The cost of goods sold is, clearly, an important component of the gross profit margin. It is
usually calculated as the sum of the cost of materials the company purchases plus any
labor involved in the manufacture of finished goods, plus associated overhead.
The gross profit margin depends heavily on the type of business in which a company is
engaged. A service business, such as a financial services institution or a laundry,
typically has little or no cost of goods sold. A manufacturing, wholesaling, or retailing
company typically has a large cost of goods sold, with a gross profit margin that varies
from 20 percent to 40 percent.
The gross profit margin measures the amount that customers are willing to pay for a
company's product, over and above the company's cost for that product. As mentioned
previously, this is the value that the company adds to that of the products it obtains from
its suppliers. This margin can depend on the attractiveness of additional services, such
as warranties, that the company provides. The gross profit margin also depends heavily
on the ability of the sales force to persuade its customers of the value added by the
company.
This added value is, of course, created by other costs such as operating expenses. In
turn, these costs must be met largely by the gross profit on sales. If customers do not
© Copyright, 2009, The Vickers Company, All Rights Reserved.
place sufficient value on whatever the company adds to its products, there will not be
enough gross profit to pay for the associated costs. Therefore, the calculation of the
gross profit margin helps to highlight the effectiveness of the company's sales strategies
The gross profit margin measures the amount that customers are willing to pay for a
company's product, over and above the company's cost for that product. As mentioned
previously, this is the value that the company adds to that of the products it obtains from
its suppliers. This margin can depend on the attractiveness of additional services, such
as warranties, that the company provides. The gross profit margin also depends heavily
on the ability of the sales force to persuade its customers of the value added by the
company.
This added value is, of course, created by other costs such as operating expenses. In
turn, these costs must be met largely by the gross profit on sales. If customers do not
place sufficient value on whatever the company adds to its products, there will not be
enough gross profit to pay for the associated costs. Therefore, the calculation of the
gross profit margin helps to highlight the effectiveness of the company's sales strategies
and sales management.
200.00%
PT INDONESIA POWER
0.00%
2006 2007 2008 2009
When net profit margin falls dramatically from the first to the fourth quarters, a principal
culprit is cost of sales.
Another place to look when you see a discrepancy between gross profit margin and net
profit margin is operating expenses. When the two margins covary closely, it suggests that
management is doing a good job of reducing expenses when sales fall, and increasing
expenses when necessary to support production and sales in better times.
200.0%
PT INDONESIA POWER
0.0%
2006 2007 2008 2009
This formula will return the percentage earnings for a company in terms of its total assets.
The better the job that management does in managing its assets-the resources available to
it-to bring about profits, the greater this percentage will be.
It's normal to calculate the return on total assets on an annual basis, rather than on a
quarterly basis.
200.0%
PT INDONESIA POWER
0.0%
2006 2007 2008 2009
You can compare return on equity with return on assets to infer how a company obtains the
funds used to acquire assets.
The principal difference between the formula for return on assets and for return on
equity is the use of equity rather than total assets in the denominator, and it is here
that the technique of comparing ratios comes into play. By examining the difference
between Return on Assets and Return on Equity, you can largely determine how the
company is funding its operations.
Assets are acquired through two major sources: creditors (through borrowing) and
stockholders (through retained earnings and capital contributions). Collectively, the retained
earnings and capital contributions constitute the company's equity. When the value of the
company's assets exceeds the value of its equity, you can expect that some form of
financial leverage makes up the difference: i.e., debt financing.
Therefore, if the Return on Equity ratio is much larger than the Return on Assets ratio, you
can infer that the company has funded some portion of its operations through borrowing.
2.00
PT INDONESIA POWER
0.00
2006 2007 2008 2009
Where Days is the number of days in the period for which Accounts Receivable and Credit
Sales accumulate.
You should interpret the average collection period in terms of the company's credit policies.
If, for example, the company's policy as stated to its customers is that payment is to be
received within two weeks, then an average collection period of 30 days indicates that
collections are lagging. It may be that collection procedures need to be reviewed, or it is
possible that one particularly large account is responsible for most of the collections in
arrears. It is also possible that the qualifying procedures used by the sales force are not
stringent enough.
The calculation of the Average Collection Period assumes that credit sales are distributed
roughly evenly during any given period. To the degree that the credit sales cluster at the
end of the period, the Average Collection Period will return an inflated figure. If you obtain a
result that appears too long (or too short), be sure to check whether the sales dates occur
evenly throughout the period in question.
© Copyright, 2009, The Vickers Company, All Rights Reserved.
Regardless of the cause, if the average collection period is over-long, it means that the
company is losing profit. The company is not converting cash due from customers into new
possible that one particularly large account is responsible for most of the collections in
arrears. It is also possible that the qualifying procedures used by the sales force are not
stringent enough.
The calculation of the Average Collection Period assumes that credit sales are distributed
roughly evenly during any given period. To the degree that the credit sales cluster at the
end of the period, the Average Collection Period will return an inflated figure. If you obtain a
result that appears too long (or too short), be sure to check whether the sales dates occur
evenly throughout the period in question.
Regardless of the cause, if the average collection period is over-long, it means that the
company is losing profit. The company is not converting cash due from customers into new
assets that can, in turn, be used to generate new income.
2.00
PT INDONESIA POWER
0.00
2006 2007 2008 2009
Just-in-Time inventory procedures attempt to ensure that the company obtains its
inventory no sooner than absolutely required in order to support its sales efforts. That
is, of course, an unrealistic ideal, but by calculating the inventory turnover rate you
can estimate how well a company is approaching the ideal.
where the Average Inventory figure refers to the value of the inventory on any given
day during the period during which the Cost of Goods Sold is calculated. The higher
an inventory turnover rate, the more closely a company conforms to just-in-time
procedures.
The figures for cost of goods sold and average inventory are taken directly from the
Income Statement's cost of sales and the Balance Sheet's inventory levels. In a
situation where you know only the beginning and ending inventory-for example, at the
beginning and the ending of a period-you would use the average of the two levels:
hence the term "average inventory."
© Copyright, 2009, The Vickers Company, All Rights Reserved.
The figures for cost of goods sold and average inventory are taken directly from the
Income Statement's cost of sales and the Balance Sheet's inventory levels. In a
situation where you know only the beginning and ending inventory-for example, at the
beginning and the ending of a period-you would use the average of the two levels:
hence the term "average inventory."
200.0%
PT INDONESIA POWER
0.0%
2006 2007 2008 2009
It is a healthy sign when a company's debt ratio is falls, although both stockholders and
potential creditors would prefer to see the rate of decline in the debt ratio more closely
match the decline in return on assets. As the return on assets falls, the net income available
to make payments on debt also falls. This company should probably take action to retire
some of its short-term debt, and the current portion of its long-term debt, as soon as
possible.
200.0%
PT INDONESIA POWER
0.0%
2006 2007 2008 2009
It is usually easier to acquire assets through debt than to acquire them through equity. There
are certain obvious considerations: for example, you might need to acquire investment
capital from many investors; whereas you might be able to borrow the required funds from
just one creditor. Less obvious is the issue of priority.
By law, if a firm ceases operations, its creditors have the first claim on its assets to help
repay the borrowed funds. Therefore, an investor's risk is somewhat higher than that of a
creditor, and the effect is that stockholders tend to demand a greater return on their
investment than a creditor does on its loan. The stockholder's demand for a return can take
the form of dividend requirements or return on assets, each of which tend to increase the
market value of their stock.
But there is no "always" in financial planning. Because investors usually require a higher
return on their investment than do creditors, it might seem that debt is the preferred method
of raising funds to acquire assets. Potential creditors, though, look at ratios such as the
return on assets and the debt ratio. A high debt ratio (or, conversely, a low equity ratio)
means that existing creditors have supplied a large portion of the company's assets, and
that there is relatively little stockholder's equity to help absorb the risk.
2.0
PT INDONESIA POWER
0.0
2006 2007 2008 2009
The Times Interest Earned ratio, in reality, seldom exceeds 10. A value of 44.1 is very high,
although certainly not unheard of during a particularly good quarter. A value of 5.1 would
usually be considered strong but within the normal range.
Notice that this is a measure of how deeply interest charges cut into a company's income.
A ratio of 1, for example, would mean that the company earns enough income (after
covering such costs as operating expenses and costs of sales) to cover only its interest
charges. There would be no income remaining to pay income taxes (of course, in this case
it's likely that there would be no income tax liability), to meet dividend requirements or to
retain earnings for future investments.
Snapshot Summary
1200.00%
1000.00%
800.00%
600.00%
400.00%
200.00%
0.00%
2006 2007 2008 2009
Return on Investment % Return on As sets %
Net Profit Margin % Debt Ratio %
Return on Investment %
1200.00%
1000.00%
800.00%
600.00%
400.00%
© Copyright, 2009, The Vickers Company, All Rights Reserved.
200.00%
0.00%
2006 2007 2008 2009
1200.00%
1000.00%
800.00%
600.00%
400.00%
200.00%
0.00%
2006 2007 2008 2009
Return on Assets %
1200.00%
1000.00%
800.00%
600.00%
400.00%
200.00%
0.00%
2006 2007 2008 2009
1000.00%
800.00%
600.00%
400.00%
200.00%
0.00%
2006 2007 2008 2009
400.00%
200.00%
0.00%
2006 2007 2008 2009
Debt Ratio %
1200.00%
1000.00%
800.00%
600.00%
400.00%
200.00%
0.00%
2006 2007 2008 2009
Leverage Ratio
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
2006 2007 2008 2009
Current Ratio
1.20
© Copyright, 2009, The Vickers Company, All Rights Reserved.
1.00
0.80
Current Ratio
1.20
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
2006 2007 2008 2009
Acid Test
1.20
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
2006 2007 2008 2009
PT INDONESIA POWER
= _
+
PT INDONESIA POWER
Activity ratios
Inventory for
x 365 divided by cost of sales = #DIV/0! days
Average time to collect
x 365 divided by credit sales = #DIV/0! days
Liquidity Ratios
a) Current Ratio = 1.00
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
b) Acid Test = 1.00
Current assets minus inventory
Current Liabilities
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Working Capital
PT INDONESIA POWER
= _
+
PT INDONESIA POWER
Activity ratios
Inventory for
x 365 divided by cost of sales = #DIV/0! days
Average time to collect
x 365 divided by credit sales = #DIV/0! days
Liquidity Ratios
a) Current Ratio = 1.00
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
b) Acid Test = 1.00
Current assets minus inventory
Current Liabilities
Total Assets
Total Current Liabilities
Total Liabilities
PT INDONESIA POWER
= _
+
PT INDONESIA POWER
Activity ratios
Inventory for
x 365 divided by cost of sales = #DIV/0! days
Average time to collect
x 365 divided by credit sales = #DIV/0! days
Liquidity Ratios
a) Current Ratio = 1.00
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
b) Acid Test = 1.00
Current assets minus inventory
Current Liabilities
Total Assets
Total Current Liabilities
Total Liabilities
PT INDONESIA POWER
= _
+
PT INDONESIA POWER
Activity ratios
Inventory for
x 365 divided by cost of sales = #DIV/0! days
Average time to collect
x 365 divided by credit sales = #DIV/0! days
Liquidity Ratios
a) Current Ratio = 1.00
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
b) Acid Test = 1.00
Current assets minus inventory
Current Liabilities
Total Assets
Total Current Liabilities
Total Liabilities
PT INDONESIA POWER
= _
+
PT INDONESIA POWER
Activity ratios
Inventory for
x 365 divided by cost of sales = #DIV/0! days
Average time to collect
x 365 divided by credit sales = #DIV/0! days
Liquidity Ratios
a) Current Ratio = 1.00
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
b) Acid Test = 1.00
Current assets minus inventory
Current Liabilities
Total Assets
Total Current Liabilities
Total Liabilities
PT INDONESIA POWER
= _
+
PT INDONESIA POWER
Activity ratios
Inventory for
x 365 divided by cost of sales = #DIV/0! days
Average time to collect
x 365 divided by credit sales = #DIV/0! days
Liquidity Ratios
a) Current Ratio = 1.00
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
b) Acid Test = 1.00
Current assets minus inventory
Current Liabilities
Total Assets
Total Current Liabilities
Total Liabilities
PT INDONESIA POWER
= _
+
PT INDONESIA POWER
Activity ratios
Inventory for
x 365 divided by cost of sales = #DIV/0! days
Average time to collect
x 365 divided by credit sales = #DIV/0! days
Liquidity Ratios
a) Current Ratio = 1.00
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
b) Acid Test = 1.00
Current assets minus inventory
Current Liabilities
Total Assets
Total Current Liabilities
Total Liabilities
PT INDONESIA POWER
= _
+
PT INDONESIA POWER
Activity ratios
Inventory for
x 365 divided by cost of sales = #DIV/0! days
Average time to collect
x 365 divided by credit sales = #DIV/0! days
Liquidity Ratios
a) Current Ratio = 1.00
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
b) Acid Test = 1.00
Current assets minus inventory
Current Liabilities
Total Assets
Total Current Liabilities
Total Liabilities
PT INDONESIA POWER
= _
+
PT INDONESIA POWER
Activity ratios
Inventory for
x 365 divided by cost of sales = #DIV/0! days
Average time to collect
x 365 divided by credit sales = #DIV/0! days
Liquidity Ratios
a) Current Ratio = 1.00
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
b) Acid Test = 1.00
Current assets minus inventory
Current Liabilities
Total Assets
Total Current Liabilities
Total Liabilities
PT INDONESIA POWER
= _
+
PT INDONESIA POWER
Activity ratios
Inventory for
x 365 divided by cost of sales = #DIV/0! days
Average time to collect
x 365 divided by credit sales = #DIV/0! days
Liquidity Ratios
a) Current Ratio = 1.00
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
b) Acid Test = 1.00
Current assets minus inventory
Current Liabilities
Total Assets
Total Current Liabilities
Total Liabilities
PT INDONESIA POWER
= _
+
PT INDONESIA POWER
Activity ratios
Inventory for
x 365 divided by cost of sales = #DIV/0! days
Average time to collect
x 365 divided by credit sales = #DIV/0! days
Liquidity Ratios
a) Current Ratio = 1.00
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
b) Acid Test = 1.00
Current assets minus inventory
Current Liabilities
Total Assets
Total Current Liabilities
Total Liabilities
PT INDONESIA POWER
= _
+
PT INDONESIA POWER
Activity ratios
Inventory for
x 365 divided by cost of sales = #DIV/0! days
Average time to collect
x 365 divided by credit sales = #DIV/0! days
Liquidity Ratios
a) Current Ratio = 1.00
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
b) Acid Test = 1.00
Current assets minus inventory
Current Liabilities
Total Assets
Total Current Liabilities
Total Liabilities
PT INDONESIA POWER
There is no single best method for determining a business's worth since each business sale is unique.
The wisest approach is to compute a company’s value using several techniques and then choose the one that makes the most
sense.
The deal must be financially feasible for both parties. The seller must be satisfied with the price received for the business.
Frequently, the entrepreneur feels like he is selling his baby. So, he does not want to leave a dime on the table. But, the buyer
cannot pay an excessively high price that would require heavy borrowing and would strain cash flows from the outset.
The buyer and the seller should have access to business records.
Valuations should be based on facts, not fiction.
No surprise is the best surprise. Both parties should deal with one another honestly and in good faith.
The primary reason buyers purchase existing businesses is to get their future earning potential. The second most common reason
is to get an established asset base. It is much easier to buy assets than to build them. Evaluation methods should take these
characteristics into consideration. However, too many business sellers and buyers depend on rules of thumb that ignore the unique
features of small companies. For example, cable TV franchises are valued at 11 times cash flow; advertising agencies at 75
percent of gross income; day care centers at $500 to $1,000 per child enrolled; motels at $12,300 to $14,600 per room; and
garbage pickup routes at two and one half times gross income. The problem is that such one size fits-all approaches seldom work
well because no two businesses are alike.
The best rule of thumb to use in valuing businesses is "Don't use rules of thumb to value businesses.” If you rely on these rules too
much, you can be led astray. On average, businesses sell for one third less than the accepted industry rule of thumb.
There are three techniques and several variations for determining the value of a business:
1 The balance sheet technique.
2 The earnings approach.
3 The market (or price/earnings) approach .
In manufacturing, wholesale, and retail businesses, inventory usually is the largest single asset involved in the sale. Taking a
physical inventory count is the best way to determine accurately the quantity of goods to be transferred. The sale may include
three types of inventory, each having its own method of valuation: raw materials, work in-process, and finished goods. The buyer
and the seller must arrive at a method for evaluating the inventory First-in-first-out (FIFO), last-in-first out (LIFO), and average
costing are three frequently used techniques, but the most common methods use the cost of last purchase and the replacement
value of the inventory. Before accepting any inventory value, the buyer should evaluate the condition of the goods.
One young couple purchased a lumber yard without examining the inventory completely. After completing the sale, they discovered
that most of the lumber in a warehouse they had neglected to inspect was warped and was of little value as building material. The
bargain price they paid for the business turned out not to be the good deal they had expected. To avoid such problems, some
buyers insist on having a knowledgeable representative on an inventory team that counts the inventory and checks its condition.
Nearly every sale involves merchandise that cannot be sold; but, by taking this precaution, a buyer minimizes the chance of being
stuck with worthless inventory.
Fixed assets transferred in a sale might include land, buildings, equipment, and fixtures. Business owners frequently carry real
estate and buildings at prices well below their actual market value. Equipment and fixtures, depending on their condition and
usefulness, may increase or decrease the true value of the business. Appraisals of these assets on insurance policies are helpful
guidelines for establishing market value.
Business evaluations based on balance sheet method suffer one major drawback: they do not consider the future earning potential
of the business. These techniques value assets at current prices and do not consider them as tools for creating future profits. The
next method for computing the value of a business is based on its expected future earnings.
Earnings Approach.
The buyer of an existing business is essentially purchasing its future income. The earnings approach is more refined because it
considers the future income potential of the business.
There are three versions of the earnings approach.
Variation 1: Excess Earnings Method. This method combines both the value of the firm's existing assets (over its liabilities) and an
estimate of its future earnings potential to determine a business's selling price. One advantage of this technique is that it offers an
estimate of goodwill. Goodwill is an intangible asset that often creates problems in a business sale. In fact, the most common
method of valuing a business is to compute its tangible net worth and then to add an often arbitrary adjustment for goodwill. In
essence, goodwill is the difference between an established, successful business and one that has yet to prove itself. It is based on
the company’s reputation and its ability to attract customers. A buyer should not accept blindly the seller's arbitrary adjustment for
goodwill because it is likely to be inflated.
There are three principal components in the rate of return used to value a business: (1) the basic, risk free return, (2) an inflation
premium, and (3) the risk allowance for investing in the particular business. The basic, risk free return and the inflation premium
are reflected in investments like U. S. Treasury bonds. To determine the appropriate rate of return for investing in a business, the
buyer must add to this base rate a factor reflecting the risk involved in purchasing the company. The greater the risk, the higher the
rate of return. A normal-risk business typically indicates a 25 percent rate of return.
Step 4: Compute extra earning power. A company’s extra earning power is the difference between forecasted earnings (step 3)
and total opportunity costs (step 2). Most small businesses that are for sale do not have extra earning power (i.e., excess
earnings). They show marginal or no profits.
Step 5: Estimate the value of intangibles. The owner can use the extra earning power of the business to estimate the value of its
intangible assets- that is, goodwill. Multiplying the extra earning power by a years of profit figure yields an estimate of the intangible
assets’ value. The years of profit figure for a normal risk business ranges from three to four. A very high-risk business may have a
years of profit figure of 1, while a well-established firm might use a figure of 7.
Step 6: Determine the value of the business. To determine the value of the business, the buyer simply adds the adjusted tangible
net worth (step 1) and the value of the intangibles (step 5).
Both the buyer and seller should consider the tax implications of transferring goodwill. The amount the seller receives for goodwill
is taxed as ordinary income. The buyer cannot count this amount as a deduction because goodwill is a capital asset that cannot be
depreciated or amortized for tax purposes. Instead, the buyer would prefer to pay the seller for signing a covenant not to compete
because its value is fully tax deductible.
The success of this approach depends on the accuracy of the buyer's estimates of net earnings and risk. But, it does offer a
systematic method for assigning a value to goodwill.
Variation 2: Capitalized Earnings Approach. Another earnings approach capitalizes expected net profits to determine the value of
a business. The buyer should prepare his own pro forma income statement and should ask the seller to prepare one also. Use a
five year weighted average of past sales (with the greatest weights assigned to the most recent years) to estimate sales for the
upcoming year.
Once again, the buyer must evaluate the risk involved in purchasing the business to determine the appropriate rate of return on the
investment. The greater the risk involved, the higher the return the buyer requires. Risk determination is always somewhat
subjective, but it is necessary for proper evaluation. The capitalized earnings approach divides estimated net earnings (after
subtracting the owner's reasonable salary) by the rate of return that reflects the risk level. For example, the capitalized value
(assuming a reasonable salary of $25,000) would be:
Market Approach.
The market (or price/earnings) approach uses the price/earnings ratios of similar businesses to establish the value of a company.
The buyer must use businesses whose stocks are publicly traded to get a meaningful comparison. A company's price/earnings
ratio (or P/E ratio) is the price of one share of its common stock in the market divided by its earnings per share (after deducting
preferred stock dividends). To get a representative P/E ratio, the buyer should average the P/Es of as many similar businesses as
possible. To compute the company's value, the buyer multiplies the average price/earnings ratio by the private company's
estimated earnings.
The biggest advantage of the market approach is its simplicity. But, this method suffers from several disadvantages, including the
following:
Unrepresentative earnings estimates. The private company's net earnings may not realistically reflect its true earning potential. To
minimize taxes, owners usually attempt to keep profits low and rely on fringe benefits to make up the difference.
Finding similar companies for comparison. Often, it is extremely difficult for a buyer to find comparable publicly held companies
when estimating the appropriate P/E ratio.
Applying the after-tax earnings of a private company to determine its value. If a prospective buyer is using an after-tax P/E ratio
from public companies, he also must use after-tax earnings from the private company.
Despite its drawbacks, the market approach is useful as a general guideline to establishing a company's value.
PT INDONESIA POWER
Earnings Approach
Variation 1 - Excess Earnings Method
Step 1 Adjusted tangible net worth equals $241,506 $2,006
minus
equals $239,500
Step 2 Opportunity Costs equals $184,875
Step 3 Estimated net earnings equals $0
Step 4 Extra earning power=estimated net earnings-opportunity cost =
equals ($184,875)
Step 5 Value of intangibles=extra earning power X years of profit figure =
equals ($924,375)
Step 6 Value of business tangible net worth + value of intangibles =
equals ($684,875)
$0
Value = ---------------------------------------------------------------------
0.25
Value = $0
1
Income Stream = Fourth year income X --------------
Rate of Return
= $0 X 4.00
= $0
Step 4 Discount income stream beyond four years (using fifth year present value factor)
Present value of income stream = $0 X 0.1854
equals $0
Market Approach
PT INDONESIA POWER
Optimal Operating Statement (Potential Maximum Performance) What-if Analysis Reset Spinners Calculator
PT INDONESIA POWER
SALES VOLUME REQUIRED, AT CURRENT PAYROLL LEVEL, TO PRODUCE PROFITS SALES VOLUME REQUIRED, AT CURRENT PAYROLL LEVEL, TO PRODUCE PROFITS
EQUAL TO THE PREVIOUS YEAR PROFITS-------- #DIV/0! EQUAL TO THE PREVIOUS YEAR PROFITS-------- #DIV/0!
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
PT INDONESIA POWER
Expense Analysis
Total Expenses $0 $0 $0
Operating Income $0 $0 $0
PT INDONESIA POWER
INDOPOWER $1
The Conclusion: A reduction in expenses is far more efficient than building additional sales volume.
PT INDONESIA POWER
Sales $0 $0 $0
Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) $0 $0 $0
Taxes on EBIT $0 $0 $0
EBIAT $0 $0 $0
EBIAT $0 $0 $0
Less change in invested capital $0 $0 $0
Free cash flow $0 $0 $0
Terminal value $0
Total $0 $0 $0
PV factor 89.29% 79.72% 71.18%
PV of cash flow and terminal value $0 $0 $0
Cumulative PV $0 $0 $0
PT INDONESIA POWER
Adjusted Current
Expenses Year
FOR THE PERIOD OF...... 2006 2006
1000.00%
900.00%
800.00%
700.00%
600.00%
500.00%
400.00%
300.00%
200.00%
100.00%
0.00%
Adjusted Current
PT INDONESIA POWER
Total
Impact of
Reductions
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0! Days Less
Impact Impact
Over Over
1 Year 4 Years
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
PT INDONESIA POWER
A firm’s degree of financial leverage is the extent to which that firm finances its assets by borrowing. More specifically,
financial leverage is the extent to which a firm’s Return on Assets exceeds the cost of financing those assets by means of
debt. The firm expects that the leverage acquired by borrowing will bring it earnings that will exceed the fixed costs of the
assets and of the sources of funds. The firm expects that these added earnings will increase the amount of returns to
shareholders.
Today it is almost impossible for a firm to succeed financially without using some form of leverage. Firms
commonly use leverage as a tool to help bolster their financial position and operating condition (for example, their return to
stockholders).
However, with increased leverage comes increased risk. If your company chooses to be highly leveraged, it must be willing
to accept the risk that the downside losses will be as great as its upside profits. This can easily occur if a firm’s sales
volume is not large enough to cover its fixed operating expenses and the required interest payments on its debt.
You can find plenty of examples of this phenomenon in a stack of annual reports from the 1980s. Within that stack you can
find several companies that were highly leveraged. Tracking these firms through the 1990s, you would see trends depicting
peaks and troughs: the positive and the negative impacts of using leverage to operate a business. Many firms were
acquired via "Leveraged buyouts," where the funds needed to make the acquisition were themselves borrowed (hence the
term "leveraged").
The likelihood of experiencing these kinds of swings is one reason that managers, analysts, and stockholders must apply
the concepts of operating and financial leverage to accurately analyze a firm’s overall value and financial health.
One of your employees suggests that, if you purchase a personal computer and a modem, your customers could send their
own designs for greeting cards to you electronically. This would save you the cost of doing the design and layout of the
cards for each order.
If you can remove the cost of design and layout, your total costs will drop from $18.00 to $15.00 per order and your
operating income per box will increase from $17.00 to $20.00.
On the other hand, purchasing a computer and a modem will cost $1,400. This will introduce a new, fixed cost to the
production of the cards. You will have to sell 70 boxes of greeting cards (70 boxes * $20.00 profit) to cover the cost of the
equipment—that is, to break even on the investment.
You should base your decision on how dependable your business card orders are. Suppose that you have a steady stream
of around 60 orders per month. In that case, you break even on the investment in a little over a month, and after that you
show an additional $3.00 profit for every order. That added profit is the result of leveraging your capital investment.
Now suppose that your business card orders are not so dependable. Most of your business depends on the patronage of
one large account. When its business is good, and it is hiring and promoting staff, you receive frequent orders from it for
greeting cards. But when its business is not so good, you can go for several months with only a few orders.
If the timing of your investment in the computer coincides with a drop in orders for greeting cards, the computer could sit
idle for several months. There will be little profit to cover its cost, the break-even point will be pushed well into the future,
and you will have lost the opportunity to invest the $1,400 in some other manner, such as advertising. The leverage is
actually working against you.
So, operating leverage cuts both ways. A good decision can increase your profitability dramatically, once you have broken
even on the fixed cost. Bad timing can cut your profitability dramatically if it takes longer than anticipated to break even on
the investment.
• Store A has decided to incur the lowest fixed and highest variable costs of the three stores. It has little in the way of
special equipment, and relies heavily on the experience and knowledge of its salespeople. At this store, sales commissions
are relatively high.
Store A
$450,000
$400,000
$350,000
$300,000
$250,000
$200,000
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000
$0 Units Sold (000)
20 50 80 110 140 170 200
• Store B has decided to incur fixed costs that are higher than that of Store A, but to keep its variable costs lower than Store
A. This store has invested a moderate amount of money in paint-mixing equipment that enables a salesperson to match
paint samples automatically. It believes that reliance on this equipment allows it to hire salespeople who are less
experienced; its sales staff therefore does not earn as much as that at Store A.
Store B
Fixed costs: $40,000.00 Variable costs: $1.20 Unit price: $2.00
Units Sold (000) Sales Fixed costs Variable Costs Total Costs Profits
20 $40,000 $40,000 $24,000 $64,000 ($24,000)
50 $100,000 $40,000 $60,000 $100,000 $0
80 $160,000 $40,000 $96,000 $136,000 $24,000
110 $220,000 $40,000 $132,000 $172,000 $48,000
Store B
$450,000
$400,000
$350,000
$300,000
$250,000
$200,000
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000
$0 Units Sold (000)
20 50 80 110 140 170 200
• Store C has decided to incur the highest fixed and lowest variable costs of the three. It has invested heavily in equipment
that not only matches paint samples exactly, but mixes paints automatically to produce a gallon of matching paint. Its
salespeople need no special knowledge, and receive lower commissions than the sales staffs at Store A and Store B.
Store C
$450,000
$400,000
$350,000
$300,000
$250,000
$200,000
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000
$0 Units Sold (000)
20 50 80 110 140 170 200
The examples above display an analysis of each store’s sales and Earnings Before Interest and Taxes (EBIT) for a given
quantity of sales at their existing fixed costs, variable costs, and unit sales rates.
The examples also make some trends evident. These trends are consequences of each store’s decision as to the
relationship between its variable costs and its fixed costs:
Store A, which has the lowest fixed cost and the highest per unit cost, will break even faster than Store B and Store C.
However, once the break-even point has been met and as the level of production increases, Store A’s EBIT will not be as
great as either Store B’s or Store C’s. This is because Store A has the highest per unit sales cost. No matter how many
gallons of paint it sells, it incurs the same, relatively high sales commission on each sale.
Store C, which has the highest fixed costs and the lowest per unit sales cost, breaks even more slowly than the other two
stores. But after the break-even point has been reached, Store C’s EBIT rises faster than either Store A or Store B because
of its low sales commission rates.
Store A
Units Sold (000) Sales Fixed costs Variable Costs Profits
Store B
20 $40,000 $40,000 $24,000 ($24,000)
50 $100,000 $40,000 $60,000 $0
80 $160,000 $40,000 $96,000 $24,000
110 $220,000 $40,000 $132,000 $48,000
140 $280,000 $40,000 $168,000 $72,000
170 $340,000 $40,000 $204,000 $96,000
200 $400,000 $40,000 $240,000 $120,000
Store C
20 $40,000 $60,000 $20,000 ($40,000)
50 $100,000 $60,000 $50,000 ($10,000)
80 $160,000 $60,000 $80,000 $20,000
110 $220,000 $60,000 $110,000 $50,000
140 $280,000 $60,000 $140,000 $80,000
170 $340,000 $60,000 $170,000 $110,000
200 $400,000 $60,000 $200,000 $140,000
$150,000
Profits ($)
$100,000
$50,000
($50,000)
20 50 80 110 140 170 200
$150,000
Break-Even Applied
Profits ($)
$100,000
Leveraging
$50,000
$0
($50,000)
20 50 80 110(000)
Units Sold 140 170 200
Store A Store B Store C
Store A, for example, has a DOL of 1.5 with unit sales of 120,000:
DOL =120,000*($2.00-$1.50)/(120,000*($2.00-$1.50)=$20,000)
DOL = 1.5
These calculations quantify the data shown in example below. The numbers indicate that the EBIT of the companies that
have the greatest operating leverage are also the most sensitive to changes in sales volume.
$160,000
$140,000
$120,000
$100,000
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000 © Copyright, 2009, The Vickers Company, All Rights Reserved.
$0
120000 200000 120000 200000 120000 200000
Store A Store A Store B Store B Store C Store C
Units Sold (000)
Profit ($)
$160,000
$140,000 Break-Even Applied
$120,000
$100,000 Leveraging
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
$0
120000 200000 120000 200000 120000 200000
Store A Store A Store B Store B Store C Store C
Units Sold (000)
Each store sells the same number of units: 120,000 or 200,000. Each store sells them for the same price: $2.00 per unit.
But because the stores differ in their fixed and variable costs, they also differ in their 1 BIT. For Store A, a 67% increase in
unit sales from 120,000 to 200,000 results in a (67% * 1.5 DOL) or 100% increase in EBIT. For Store B, a 67% increase in
unit sales results in a (67% * 1.7 DOL) or 114% increase in EBIT. And Store C experiences a (67% * 2.0 DOL) or 133%
increase in EBIT. So, the higher the DOL, the greater the EBIT as unit sales increase.
Expressed in raw dollar amounts, an increase in unit sales from 120,000 to 200,000 means an increase in profits of
$40,000 for Store A, $64,000 for Store B, and $80,000 for Store C.
However, the calculated DOL will be the same on the downside. So for every decrease in sales volume, each firm’s DOL
will cause an unwanted decrease in EBIT corresponding to the desired increase in EBIT (see example below).
$160,000
$110,000
$60,000
$10,000
($40,000)
200000 120000 200000 120000 200000 120000
Store A Store A Store B Store B Store C Store C
Units Sold (000)
The DOL gives managers a great deal of information for setting operating targets and planning profitability. For example,
you would want to make operating leverage decisions based on your knowledge of how your sales volume fluctuates. If
your company experiences large swings in sales volume throughout the year, it would be much riskier to maintain a high
degree of leverage than it would be if your company has a predictable, steady stream of sales.
HotDog Man presently has fixed costs of $10,000 per month. The lease of a new office, closer to the sales area, would cost
an additional $2,200 per month. This would increase the fixed costs to $12,200 per month (see below).
Fixed Variable
1994 sales month Units Sales costs Costs EBIT
January 6,582 $14,480 $10,000 $3,949 $531
February 11,121 $24,466 $10,000 $6,673 $7,794
March 14,178 $31,192 $10,000 $8,507 $12,685
April 13,692 $30,122 $10,000 $8,215 $11,907
May 11,597 $25,513 $10,000 $6,958 $8,555
June 9,599 $21,118 $10,000 $5,759 $5,358
July 9,913 $21,809 $10,000 $5,948 $5,861
August 10,926 $24,037 $10,000 $6,556 $7,482
September 14,349 $31,568 $10,000 $8,609 $12,958
October 12,965 $28,523 $10,000 $7,779 $10,744
November 6,972 $15,338 $10,000 $4,183 $1,155
December 4,972 $10,938 $10,000 $2,983 ($2,045)
Sum: $82,986
Standard Deviation: $4,963
Although the lease of new offices would increase the fixed costs, a careful estimate of the potential savings in gasoline and
vehicle maintenance indicates that HotDog Man could reduce the variable costs from $0.60 per unit to $0.35 per unit. Total
sales are unlikely to increase as a result of the move, but the savings in variable costs could increase the annual profit from
$82,986 to $88,302. This is a 6.4% growth in profit margin: not an insignificant amount (see below).
Sum: $88,302
Standard Deviation: $5,738
But look at the change in the variability of the profit from month to month. From November through January, when it is much
more difficult to lure office workers out into the cold to purchase coffee, HotDog Man barely breaks even. In fact, in
December of 1994, the business lost money.
The example above indicates that by moving some of the expenses from the category of variable costs to that of fixed
costs, HotDog Man increases total annual earnings but the variability of the earnings from month to month also increases.
Although the company earns more during the spring and fall by reducing the variable costs, it loses more during the winter
months because it must continue to meet its higher fixed costs.
The increase in variability is also reflected in the HotDog Man’s DOL. As shown in both examples, the DOL would increase
from 2.45 to 2.66 as a result of increasing fixed costs and decreasing variable costs. Both the DOL and the business risk
would increase if HotDog Man moved its offices.
If HotDog Man has plenty of money in the bank to meet unexpected expenses, such as major repairs to its trucks or the
trucks’ coffee brewers, then the acceptance of greater fixed costs may make good financial as well as operational sense.
But if HotDog Man’s owners frequently take profits out of the business, so that it has relatively little in the way of resources
to cushion the impact of unexpected expenses, it might be unwise to add to its fixed costs. Where will the money come
from to repair a truck that breaks down at the end of January?
Managers can use the DOL to plan not only their operations, as was done in the HotDog Man case study, but also their net
income and their pricing. It is useful to perform sensitivity analysis around sales volume levels, and around adjustments to
both fixed and variable expenses.
Variability in profit levels, whether measured as EBIT, operating income, or net income does not necessarily increase the
level of business risk as the DOL increases. If the variability is predictable—if the timing and size of the swings can be
forecast with confidence—then a company can anticipate and allow for them in its budgets.
Performing an analysis of the impacts that leverage can have on a firm’s profitability is essential to a clear picture of the risk
a company has decided to take on. However, the DOL is only one of the indicators that a manager, shareholder, or creditor
uses to measure the value and risk to a firm’s financial health. Another important measure is a company’s degree of
financial leverage.
In contrast, financial risk is the additional exposure, above and beyond business risk, that a firm incurs by using financial
leverage: that is, the debt that the firm assumes by financing the acquisition of its assets.
Suppose, for example, that you decide to start a business that offers training classes in the design of business software.
Your business risk consists of factors such as the desirability of the training, the number of people who might want it, the
number of other firms that offer similar training classes, the market share of business software systems that you choose to
focus on, and the quality and price of your service relative to that of your competition.
It is useful to separate business from financial risk to make decisions pertaining to financial leverage. One way to focus on
financial risk is to analyze a firm’s financial structure: that is, the way that the firm has gone about financing its assets. Part
of a company’s overall financial structure is its capital structure. The company’s capital structure is the combination of
various forms of debt and equity that are used to finance its assets.
A thorough understanding of the debt that your company has assumed significantly enhances your ability to make good
decisions about acquiring new debt. As a creditor, it is essential to understand a borrower’s capital structure in order to
measure the risk of making a loan, and to determine whether the interest rate is in line with that risk.
The acquisition of additional debt, of course, changes a company’s degree of financial leverage, and therefore new debt
can have either a beneficial or a detrimental impact on the evaluations made by creditors and stockholders.
Suppose that you can obtain a loan at 9 percent interest to finance the acquisition of new computer workstations. If the
return on the assets represented by the new workstations is 12 percent, you will have leveraged the loan, to your benefit.
But if the return on this equipment turns out to be only 6 percent, the leverage works against you: you will pay more in
interest than you will earn from the asset.
The ratios provide managers, analysts, investors, and creditors with useful indications of how financial leverage impacts the
level of financial risk a company has assumed. The ratio information is critical for determining the stability, and even the
solvency, of a company.
The Debt Ratio measures the proportion of a firm’s total assets that are financed, both short-term and long-term, by means
of creditors’ funds. Managers, analysts, shareholders, and creditors use the Debt Ratio as one indicator of how much risk a
firm is carrying.
For example, a company’s value is in large measure a function of the value of its assets. If a firm has a high debt ratio, then
a high proportion of its assets has been financed by means of debt. This implies that the company must spend a greater
proportion of its earnings to pay off those debts, instead of reinvesting its earnings in the company.
A firm’s debt ratio is also a useful indicator of how well it will weather difficult financial times. For example, if a company with
a high debt ratio suffers significant earnings losses, it will be hard pressed to continue operations and simultaneously pay
off its debts. But a company with a low debt ratio is in a much better position to continue operations if earnings decrease,
because it will not need to use its earnings for debt retirement.
In debt ratio example, Firm C has the highest debt ratio. This implies that if the firm were to experience a recessionary
period, the cash flow it generates may not be sufficient to meet principal and interest payments on the debt acquired. In this
example, the Debt Ratio indicates that Firm C is at the greatest financial risk.
The Equity Ratio is the opposite of the Debt Ratio. It returns the ratio of a firm’s equity to its assets. The higher the Equity
Ratio, the lower a firm’s financial leverage.
The Times Interest Earned ratios in the example indicate that Firm A, because it has relatively low debt, uses a lower
proportion of its earnings to cover interest payments. Firm B covers annual interest payments four times at its current
earnings level, and Firm C covers annual interest payments two times at its current earnings level.
Firm C runs a greater risk of financial difficulty than the other two firms. This is because it must cover interest payments
before applying earnings to any other purpose, such as reinvestment.
Summary
In the business environment operating and financial leverage are important ingredients in determining the success or
demise of many companies. Firms acquire leverage to bolster their financial positions, thus increasing shareholder value.
However, with increased leverage comes increased risk. Managers, analysts, shareholders, and creditors must be very
clear about the implications of the risks associated with a firm’s operating and financial leverage to make investment
decisions. Knowing these implications brings their decisions in line with their desired levels of risk.
PT INDONESIA POWER
-$2,000
REVENUE FIXED COSTS TOTAL COSTS
-$2,500
Total Sales: $0 What-if Sales: 106% Value of What-if Sales: $0
Total Cost of Sales: $0 What-if Cost of Sales: 131% Value of What-if Cost of Sales: $0
Total Fixed Expenses: $0 What-if Fixed Expenses: 131% Value of What-if Fixed Expenses: $0
PT INDONESIA POWER
-$2,000
REVENUE FIXED COSTS TOTAL COSTS
-$2,500
Total Sales: $0 What-if Sales: 100% Value of What-if Sales: $0
Total Cost of Sales: $0 What-if Cost of Sales: 100% Value of What-if Cost of Sales: $0
Total Fixed Expenses: $0 What-if Fixed Expenses: 100% Value of What-if Fixed Expenses: $0
PT INDONESIA POWER
-$2,000
REVENUE FIXED COSTS TOTAL COSTS
-$2,500
Total Sales: $0 What-if Sales: 100% Value of What-if Sales: $0
Total Cost of Sales: $0 What-if Cost of Sales: 100% Value of What-if Cost of Sales: $0
Total Fixed Expenses: $0 What-if Fixed Expenses: 100% Value of What-if Fixed Expenses: $0
PT INDONESIA POWER
-$2,000
REVENUE FIXED COSTS TOTAL COSTS
-$2,500
Total Sales: $0 What-if Sales: 100% Value of What-if Sales: $0
Total Cost of Sales: $0 What-if Cost of Sales: 100% Value of What-if Cost of Sales: $0
Total Fixed Expenses: $0 What-if Fixed Expenses: 100% Value of What-if Fixed Expenses: $0
PT INDONESIA POWER
-$2,000
REVENUE FIXED COSTS TOTAL COSTS
-$2,500
Total Sales: $0 What-if Sales: 100% Value of What-if Sales: $0
Total Cost of Sales: $0 What-if Cost of Sales: 100% Value of What-if Cost of Sales: $0
Total Fixed Expenses: $0 What-if Fixed Expenses: 100% Value of What-if Fixed Expenses: $0
PT INDONESIA POWER
-$2,000
REVENUE FIXED COSTS TOTAL COSTS
-$2,500
Total Sales: $0 What-if Sales: 100% Value of What-if Sales: $0
Total Cost of Sales: $0 What-if Cost of Sales: 100% Value of What-if Cost of Sales: $0
Total Fixed Expenses: $0 What-if Fixed Expenses: 100% Value of What-if Fixed Expenses: $0
PT INDONESIA POWER
-$2,000
REVENUE FIXED COSTS TOTAL COSTS
-$2,500
Total Sales: $0 What-if Sales: 100% Value of What-if Sales: $0
Total Cost of Sales: $0 What-if Cost of Sales: 100% Value of What-if Cost of Sales: $0
Total Fixed Expenses: $0 What-if Fixed Expenses: 100% Value of What-if Fixed Expenses: $0
PT INDONESIA POWER
-$2,000
REVENUE FIXED COSTS TOTAL COSTS
-$2,500
Total Sales: $0 What-if Sales: 100% Value of What-if Sales: $0
Total Cost of Sales: $0 What-if Cost of Sales: 100% Value of What-if Cost of Sales: $0
Total Fixed Expenses: $0 What-if Fixed Expenses: 100% Value of What-if Fixed Expenses: $0
PT INDONESIA POWER
-$2,000
REVENUE FIXED COSTS TOTAL COSTS
-$2,500
Total Sales: $0 What-if Sales: 100% Value of What-if Sales: $0
Total Cost of Sales: $0 What-if Cost of Sales: 100% Value of What-if Cost of Sales: $0
Total Fixed Expenses: $0 What-if Fixed Expenses: 100% Value of What-if Fixed Expenses: $0
PT INDONESIA POWER
-$2,000
REVENUE FIXED COSTS TOTAL COSTS
-$2,500
Total Sales: $0 What-if Sales: 100% Value of What-if Sales: $0
Total Cost of Sales: $0 What-if Cost of Sales: 100% Value of What-if Cost of Sales: $0
Total Fixed Expenses: $0 What-if Fixed Expenses: 100% Value of What-if Fixed Expenses: $0
PT INDONESIA POWER
-$2,000
REVENUE FIXED COSTS TOTAL COSTS
-$2,500
Total Sales: $0 What-if Sales: 100% Value of What-if Sales: $0
Total Cost of Sales: $0 What-if Cost of Sales: 100% Value of What-if Cost of Sales: $0
Total Fixed Expenses: $0 What-if Fixed Expenses: 100% Value of What-if Fixed Expenses: $0
PT INDONESIA POWER
-$2,000
REVENUE FIXED COSTS TOTAL COSTS
-$2,500
Total Sales: $0 What-if Sales: 100% Value of What-if Sales: $0
Total Cost of Sales: $0 What-if Cost of Sales: 100% Value of What-if Cost of Sales: $0
Total Fixed Expenses: $0 What-if Fixed Expenses: 100% Value of What-if Fixed Expenses: $0
PT INDONESIA POWER
$2,500
$2,000
$1,500
$1,000
$500
$0
Sales Performance
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
2006 2007 2008 2009
Total Expenses
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
2006 2007 2008 2009
Labor Expenses
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
2006 2007 2008 2009
Materials Cost
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
2006 2007 2008 2009
2009
2008.5
2008
2007.5
2007
2006.5
2006
2005.5
2005
2004.5
2006 2007 2008 2009
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
$1
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
1 2 3 4
Profit
2009
2008.5
2008
2007.5
2007
2006.5
2006
2005.5
2005
2004.5
2006 2007 2008 2009
Return On Ownership
10
0
2006 2007 2008 2009
$2,000,000
$500,000
$0
Industry
$2,500,000
$2,000,000
$500,000
$0
Signs $0
Supplies $0
Taxes & Licenses $0
Utilities & Telephone $850 $893 $808
Other:
Enter description here $0
Enter description here $0
Enter description here $0
Subtotal $64,322 $67,538 $61,106
Other Cash Out Flows:
Capital Purchases $0
Building Construction $0
Decorating $0
Fixtures & Equipment $0
Install Fixtures & Equip. $0
Remodeling $0
Lease Payments $0
Loan Principal $0
Owner's Draw $6,000 $6,300 $5,700
Other:
Enter description here $0
Enter description here $0
Enter description here $0
Subtotal $6,000 $6,300 $5,700
Total Cash Outflows $70,322 $73,838 $66,806
Ending Cash Balance $236,278 $218,032 $254,524
Other:
Enter description here $0
Enter description here $0
Enter description here $0
Subtotal $64,322 $67,538 $61,106
Other Cash Out Flows:
Capital Purchases $0
Building Construction $0
Decorating $0
Fixtures & Equipment $0
Install Fixtures & Equip. $0
Remodeling $0
Lease Payments $0
Loan Principal $0
Owner's Draw $6,000 $6,300 $5,700
Other:
Enter description here $0
Enter description here $0
Enter description here $0
Subtotal $6,000 $6,300 $5,700
Total Cash Outflows $70,322 $73,838 $66,806
Ending Cash Balance $236,278 $218,032 $254,524
Return on investment
250%
200%
150%
100%
50%
0%
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Finance
Financial Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $30,000 $7,500
Credit Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 25,000 6,250
Open 0.00 0
Total 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 8.00 $13,750
Human Resources
Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $40,000 $10,000
Open 0.00 0
Open 0.00 0
Total 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $10,000
Information Technology
Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $40,000 $10,000
Open 0.00 0
Total 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $10,000
Accounting
Controller 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $30,000 $7,500
Open 0.00 0
Total 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $7,500
Sales
Sales Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $40,000 $10,000
Sales Representatives 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 8.00 59,000 29,500
Open 0.00 0
Total 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 12.00 $39,500
Marketing
Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $35,000 $8,750
Open 0.00 0
Total 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 $8,750
Total number
Department % of total Total comp % of total
of employees
Executive 8 18.2% $230,000 30.1%
Finance 8 18.2% 77,050 10.1%
Human Resources 4 9.1% 52,000 6.8%
Information Technology 4 9.1% 52,000 6.8% Quarterly metrics:
Accounting 4 9.1% 39,000 5.1%
Sales 12 27.3% 229,100 29.9% Q1
Operations 4 9.1% 40,500 5.3% Q2
Marketing 0 0.0% 45,500 5.9% Q3
Q4
Corporate Totals 44 100.0% $765,150 100.0%
Variable Stock-based
Total compensation
pay compensation
$22,500 $20,000 $230,000
3,300.00 5,000.00 77,050.00
2,000.00 0.00 52,000.00
2,000.00 0.00 52,000.00
1,500.00 0.00 39,000.00
31,600.00 0.00 229,100.00
3,000.00 0.00 40,500.00
1,750.00 0.00 45,500.00
Quarterly metrics:
Salary Benefits Salary + benefits
$134,500 $33,625 $168,125
134,500 33,625 168,125
134,500 33,625 168,125
134,500 33,625 168,125
$538,000 $134,500 $672,500
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Salary Benefits Salary + benefits
Finance
Vice president 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $200,000 $50,000
Financial planning director 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 125,000 31,250
Financial analyst 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 8.00 100,000 50,000
Credit analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 70,000 17,500
Advisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 85,000 21,250
0.00 0
Total 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 24.00 $170,000
Human Resources
Vice president 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $140,000 $35,000
Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 100,000 25,000
Senior human resource representative 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 8.00 80,000 40,000
Benefits coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 75,000 18,750
Compensation manager 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 8.00 75,000 37,500
Human resource generalist 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 8.00 65,000 32,500
Payroll 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 65,000 16,250
Trainer 0.00 65,000 0
Recruiter 0.00 65,000 0
0.00 0
Total 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 40.00 $205,000
Information Technology
Vice president 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $140,000 $35,000
Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 110,000 27,500
Systems engineer 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 8.00 90,000 45,000
Systems analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 90,000 22,500
Technician 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 6.00 80,000 20,000
Accounting
Vice president 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $130,000 $32,500
Controller 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 95,000 23,750
Accounting manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 75,000 18,750
Accounts receivable 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 55,000 13,750
Accounts payable 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 55,000 13,750
Treasury 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 75,000 18,750
General accountant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 55,000 13,750
0.00 0
Total 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 28.00 $135,000
Sales
Vice president 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $120,000 $30,000
Regional director 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 8.00 100,000 50,000
Business development 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 90,000 22,500
Direct sales representative 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 16.00 90,000 90,000
Inside sales 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 75,000 18,750
Sales operations 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 75,000 18,750
Channel sales representative 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 80,000 20,000
0.00 0
Total 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 44.00 $250,000
Marketing
Vice president 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $135,000 $33,750
Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 105,000 26,250
Product manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 90,000 22,500
Market research 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 75,000 18,750
Market analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 75,000 18,750
Product manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 90,000 22,500
Merchandiser 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 70,000 17,500
Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 50,000 12,500
0.00 0
Total 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 20.00 $172,500
Total number
Department % of total Total comp % of total
of employees
Key metrics:
Revenue/employee $60,063 $0
Total compensation/employee $37,107 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Salary Benefits Salary + benefits
Net profit/employee $1,802
Variable Stock-based
Total compensation
pay compensation
$186,000 $200,000 $1,936,000
68,000.00 50,000.00 968,000.00
41,750.00 0.00 1,085,500.00
47,500.00 0.00 1,235,000.00
27,000.00 0.00 702,000.00
400,000.00 0.00 1,650,000.00
70,500.00 0.00 951,750.00
34,500.00 0.00 897,000.00
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Salary Benefits Salary + benefits
ONLINE SUPPORT:mailto:vickerscompany@bellsouth.net
Dashboard'!A2:T381
Excel 97-
2003
Executive Summary'!A1:AB94
Excel 97-
2003
H-Factor'!C3:V64
Excel 97-
2003
Springate'!C1:U58
Excel 97-
2003
Snapshot Summary
Excel 97-
Chart'!C1:S158
2003
Snapshot'!C1:W44
Excel 97-
2003
Snapshot (2)'!C1:W44
Excel 97-
2003
Snapshot (3)'!C1:W44
Excel 97-
2003
Snapshot (4)'!C1:W44
Excel 97-
2003
Snapshot (5)'!C1:W44
Excel 97-
2003
Snapshot (6)'!C1:W44
Excel 97-
2003
Snapshot (7)'!C1:W44
Excel 97-
2003
Snapshot (8)'!C1:W44
Excel 97-
2003
Snapshot (9)'!C1:W44
Excel 97-
2003
Snapshot (10)'!C1:W44
Excel 97-
2003
Snapshot (11)'!C1:W44
Excel 97-
2003
Snapshot (12)'!C1:W44
Excel 97-
2003
Industry Analysis'!B1:L39
Excel 97-
2003
SB HeadcountExcel
Analysis'!A2:P109
97-
2003
Corporate Headcount
Excel 97-
Analysis'!A2:P151
2003