The ‘Baby Muhammad’ Jihad Comes to

America
12/09/2019 by Raymond Ibrahim 17 Comments

FrontPage Magazine

If Muhammad cannot beat the infidels on the battlefield, he’ll outbreed them—
literally: Last year it was reported that “Mohammed most popular name for
newborn boys in the Netherlands for second year in a row.” Muhammad is
apparently also the most popular name in England. In fact, Muhammad is one of the
most popular names throughout Northwest Europe.

And now, for the first time ever, Muhammad has made the list of top ten baby
names in America. As the Baby Center explains: “Arabic names are on the rise this
year, with Muhammad and Aaliyah entering the top 10 and
nudging Mason and Layla off.”
While all this may seem innocuous enough—what’s in a name?—the fact is many
Muslims see their offspring as contributions to the “struggle” to make Islam
supreme, since more numbers equate more influence and power. Nor is the naming
of “Muhammad” a coincidence but rather a cryptic reminder from the
parents concerning whom they most revere and hope their sons emulate—namely,
the founder of Islam/jihad.

Although the original, historic jihad was straightforward warfare on the infidel to
make Islam supreme, the ulema articulated a variety of other jihads, all of which
work to the same end: as with jihad al-lisan (literally tongue, meaning propaganda,
apologias, polemics, etc.) and jihad al-mal (monetarily or materially supporting
jihadis, including through zakat), so too jihad al-wilada (or childbearing) is seen as a
way to contribute to the “struggle” to make Islam supreme.

This can be achieved with either infidel or Muslim women. As an example of the
first, a Muslim imam was videotaped saying that, because European men lack
virility, their women seek fertility among Muslim men. Accordingly, “We will give
them fertility! We will breed children with them, because we will conquer their
countries! Whether you like it or not, you Germans, Americans, French, and Italians
and all those akin to you [Western people]—take in the refugees. For soon we will
call them [and their European born sons] in the name of the coming caliphate! And
we will say to you, ‘These are our sons.’”

That some Muslim men operate along this logic is evident. The diary of Patrick
Kabele, an African Muslim man who was living and arrested in Britain for trying to
join the Islamic State—his primary motive being to purchase a nine-year-old sex
slave—had references that only likeminded Muslims would understand: in an effort,
as the aforementioned imam said, to use European women as incubators and “breed
children with them,” Kabele noted that he had been “seeding some women over
here, UK white,” adding, “I dont [sic] kiss anymore.” (Unlike straightforward mating,
kissing is deemed an intimate act, and Muslims, in keeping with the doctrine of al-
wala’ wa al-bara must never be intimate with, certainly not love, non-Muslims—
even when married to them—though they can have carnal relations with them.)

Even so, Muslim women remain the primary incubators for the jihad—and many of
them see it as their obligation. According to a 2008 report,” Muslim hate fanatics
plan to take over Britain by having more babies and forcing a population explosion,
it has been revealed. The swollen Muslim population would be enough to conquer
Britain from inside, they claim.”
A Christian Eritrean volunteer and translator who worked in migrant centers in
Germany and was often assumed to be Muslim by the migrants, confessed that
“Muslim migrants often confide in her and tell her about their dislike towards
Christians,” and that “a number of the Muslim migrants she has spoken to have
revealed a hatred for Christians and are determined to destroy the religion.” As to
how they plan on accomplishing this, “Some women told me, ‘We will multiply our
numbers. We must have more children than the Christians because it’s the only way
we can destroy them here.’”

The notion that more Muslim births mean more Muslim power is so ingrained
among Muslims that recommendations of “family planning” in West Africa—which,
despite its scarcity of resources, has the highest birthrate in the world—is regularly
seen by Muslims as a Western conspiracy. “The West’s policy is about reducing our
numbers,” said Hassane Seck, an imam from Senegal. “Because of their perverse
promotion of contraception, women in Europe are no longer fertile, but ours are.
There are going to be many more of us, and they’re afraid.” The report adds that he
and other “imams cite a passage in the Koran imploring Muslims to ‘go forth and
multiply,’ and family planning is seen by many in the region as a Western plot to
curb the spread of Islam.”

“We have 50 million Muslims in Europe,” Muammar Gaddafi claimed back in 2006,
more realistically adding, “There are signs that Allah will grant Islam victory in
Europe—without swords, without guns, without conquest—will turn it into
a Muslim continent within a few decades.” Ongoing polls and reports—including
that one out of every three people on earth are expected to be Muslim by 2070—
suggest this long cherished Muslim dream may not be so farfetched.

One Pew report says that the Muslim population of Europe could triple by 2050—
just when all those baby Muhammads are coming of age, and when the imams will
“call” on them. In Germany alone, nearly 20 percent of the population could be
Muslim by 2050; considering that the average Muslim man is more zealous over his
way of and purpose in (Islamic) life than the average German male, 20 percent is not
too little for an Islamic takeover of—or at least mass havoc in—Germany. Yet the
report also finds that even “if all migration into Europe were to immediately and
permanently stop” and due to significantly higher Muslim birthrates, Europe’s
Muslim population will still grow significantly, to about 36 million, almost double
the current population.

Not that many Western Europeans seem to care; some are even glad to see their
own kind die off and be replaced by Muslims—such as Dr. Stefanie von Berg,
who once exulted before the German parliament: “Mrs. President, ladies and
gentlemen. Our society will change. Our city will change radically. I hold that in 20,
30 years there will no longer be a [German] majority in our city. …. And I want to
make it very clear, especially towards those right wingers: This is a good thing!”

These are some of the things to think on in light of the recent news that, for the first
time ever, Muhammad has made the list of top ten baby names in the United States.