Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Rhetorical Analysis
By Wanda A. Wallace
Abigail Padilla
RWS 1301
Dr. Vierra
Abstract
source of works. Before understanding the research methods, it is important to understand the
genre first. Finding ethos, pathos, and logos in the genre is crucial to know when doing research.
Ethos is the author using credential pieces of evidence of themselves to prove their work is
credible and reliable to readers. If students can find ethos in their genre, there is a strong
possibility that the work in the genre is trustworthy and will be good of use to the student’s work
of research. Pathos is the author providing emotion towards the readers by including pieces of
claims that inspire emotions. Logos is the author providing value to the evidence and proof by
using logic, statistics, and reasoning. Students need to understand logos to continue building the
argument have research to rely on. Moreover, understanding the genre is important to students.
Rhetorical Analysis
By Wanda A. Wallace
out a successful plan. Wallace (1991) argued that any kind of project in the field of business
requires a research approach (p. 1). This implies that business requires all kinds of research in
order to execute the best plans without a negative effect on the business. The researcher must
understand the nature of the problem and how to gather facts in order to solve the problem and
should become knowledgeable of basic relevant facts that all businesspeople should know about
to avoid any consequences. Now connect research and rhetorical analysis to arrive at a thesis.
Failure is the most feared word to students. Not having any research or not knowing
anything about a genre can lead to failure. Applying ethos, pathos, and logos to the monograph
will enable students to a greater level of success in terms of research of what the monograph has
to offer. Wallace (1991) offers the different modes of persuasion but mainly the use of ethos and
logos to make it easier for students to understand the research methods of accounting by
providing credibility to the author and proof, examples, and references to support the reasoning
of the monograph (p. vii). This implies that the monograph differs from other genres because this
monograph will help me understand ethos and logos in terms of research methods in accounting
and other genres, like google, will not organize it in such a way to make it understandable to
students or myself. The understanding of research methods in accounting can lead to a reliable
source of works.
RHETORICAL ANALYSIS 4
Discussion
Ethos, pathos, and logos can be something other than just the modes or appeals there is to
persuasion. Killingsworth’s (2005) model suggested that the “appeals” are more like positions
with a metaphorically relationship to one another (p. 251). Moreover, he argued that their
relationship that each appeal has, to one another, is triangular (p. 251). Furthermore, he proposed
that the three points of the triangle become, in his revision, the positions of author, audience, and
value of proofs. This implies that ethos, pathos, and logos aren’t just appeals to persuasion, but
rather a position of the author for the concept of ethos, an audience for the concept of pathos, and
Audience
Understanding the meaning of complex terminology will help when students research
about the research methods in accounting. This monograph includes phrases that suggested it
was written for college-educated individuals interested in the research methods commonly used
in accounting for success. Wallace (1991) uses complex terminology throughout the entire
monograph describing simple business terms as “The facts themselves could explain such a
finding, since the researcher omitted consideration of a key aspect of the research context: the
existence of nonexistence of a bond insurance;” (p. 4). This implies that college students
planning on learning about this monograph should research the terms used in the book to
Ethos
As a student, it is important to choose a source that has credibility so that students know
it is a reliable source to use for their research. Wallace (1991) is a reliable author and commenter
on the topic of research methods that are best used in accounting. She has a Ph. D in accounting,
RHETORICAL ANALYSIS 5
a CPA (certified public accountant), CMA (certified management accounting), CIA (certified
internal auditor), and is a professor of accounting at Texas A&M University. She received gold
medal literary awards in 1981 and 1990 on public accounting by the American Accounting
Association (AAA) and Deloitte Haskins & Sells (p. vii). This implies that the author’s
comments and beliefs about the research methods best used for accounting majors is trustworthy
because she has many degrees and awards which is helpful to students reading the monograph.
Pathos
Learning does not make students feel any emotion other than bored but it provides
information. The monograph is boring because it appeals to pathos using a clinical approach
which makes it informative in a boring way. Wallace (1991) uses pathos in the facts brought up
and in the explanations of the arguments she makes. According to Wallace, “The objective of
this book is to equip you to be a more effective consumer of information;” (p. 1). This implies
that the entire book is meant to educate and inform readers on the topic of research methods
effectively used in accounting because the whole book includes pages of information,
explanations, and arguments made using a clinical approach to pathos to understand the different
Logos
Having reasoning and statistics makes it easier for the student reading the monograph to
understand why the author chose to say what they said and believe it is correct. The logic used in
the monograph is very strong and additionally includes support. Wallace (1991) has many
degrees and awards for the areas that had to deal with accounting (p. vii). Moreover, she
provides support that includes statistics and reasoning for her logic. This implies that her work is
RHETORICAL ANALYSIS 6
reliable and has reasoning behind it because it provides support and makes the student believe
Conclusion
Wallace’s (1991) monograph aids my research greatly because it provides the usage of
ethos and logos in the writing (p. vii). This makes it easier for me to understand the different
research methods of accounting and how ethos and logos will contribute to the success in my
research. If I can understand the research that the monograph provides for me, I will be able to
understand how to use the research methods there are in accounting. The genre differs from
many other because it provides a sense of logic and provides ethos as well. Not many other
genres, such as a journal article or google, include any research or background, or resources to be
enabled to understand the genre. If students don’t understand a genre, it leads to a student’s
waste of time.
RHETORICAL ANALYSIS 7
References
Jimmie Killingsworth, M. (2005). Rhetorical appeals: A revision. Rhetoric Review, 24(3), 249.
search.ebscohost.com.lib.utep.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.20176660
&site=eds-live&scope=site.
Wallace, W. A. (1991). In Nelson K., Regis R. (Eds.), Accounting research methods : Do the
search.ebscohost.com.lib.utep.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat04704a&AN=nug.b13548
78&site=eds-live&scope=site.