Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
What are the advantages and disadvantages of using bicycle these days?
Owing to increment in number of health related issues these days, there has been a radical
change in type of conveyance used to travel. Due to which, people are shifting towards the
traditional way of getting places, which is by bicycle. Using it as a means of transport would
not only help in diminishing the pollution, but will also contribute to better health. But there
are some major negative aspects too which must not be ignored like it may be of no use in
emergency situations and can come out as a dangerous way of going from one place to
another.
Talking about the positives first, the use of bicycle would lead to eradication of pollution.
Vehicles which run on fossil fuels produce Co2, which is responsible for carbon gas
emissions and is harmful for the ozone layer. Consequently, the air would be clean enough to
breathe which would be better for our future generations. Additionally, using bike would also
help in improving our health. It is because of these modern transport systems that obesity is at
an all time high. But with the help of this old way of travelling, we can eliminate this
problem, which in turn would not only contribute to better physical health, but will also lead
to stress free life. To exemplify, a recent survey by AIMS Delhi revealed that those who use
bicycle in their daily routine are less prone to mental issues and getting affected by modern
lifestyle diseases.
Coming to the negative impact, this way of transport can be of no use in alarming situations.
For instance, if someone is getting late for a meeting or he/she needs to visit a hospital on an
urgent basis, using bike can get them late and it can have severe repercussions. Furthermore,
riding a bicycle needs a lot of training and if not trained properly, it can have hazardous after
effects. This mode of transport can be more dangerous as a person would be having limited
security features as compared to other types of transport like car or bus wherein seatbelt is
mandatory and can help in unforeseen and dangerous situations. In fact, one of my friends
died last year while using cycle as an uncontrollable car hit him from behind. Though he was
wearing a helmet, he succumbed to injuries.
To conclude, even today, many of us may be interested in using bicycle to travel to places
and no one can deny that it is good for the environment and our own physical and mental
health. Having said that, we must also look after the side effects of using it as it may be
inappropriate in needful circumstances and it carries a huge concern from safety point of
view.
Essay topics: Computer games are very popular in all age groups and nationalities. Parents
think it has little educational value and harmful effects.
What is your opinion about this?
Give examples based on your own experience.
With the advent of technology and devices based on it, gaming today has become a well
groomed part of every individual across the world. But in case of children, it is thought by
parents that it contributes less in gaining knowledge and more towards ruining their child. In
my opinion, yes, I believe that gaming can lead to severe mental and physical illness. Also,
its after effects can be dangerous. But with proper control and measures, it can help in mental
development of a child.
To start with, computer games can not only cause side effects to a person’s brain but it may
also hamper physical health and can lead them to dangers, knowingly or unknowingly. These
games are generally addictive, because of which players are no longer interested in doing
anything else. The prolonged gaming sessions which they indulge into, causes severe eye
burning and sometimes leads to mental exertion. Consequently, it makes them obese and
affects their circular system. In some cases, they have even proven to be deadly. To illustrate,
Players Under battle Ground (PUBG), an online gaming platform has had hazardous impact
on a youngster when he had a heart attack while playing the game, as a result of not able to
complete the mission. Eventually, he died, leaving a question in front of society that should
these games be allowed to continue or is it better to ban them.
Coming to the positive part, the immense benefit of practical gaming is crucial for a person’s
mental development in today’s competitive environment. If controlled and monitored, these
games can play a vital role in developing cognitive abilities within a child at a very young
age. In other words, it enables them to learn things in a practical manner and it opens their
mind with influx of data, which they may not grasp through books. This in turn, makes them
smarter than the rest of their competitors and helps in logical explanation of things. To
exemplify, a recent research by Oxford University in a local government school revealed that
pupils who were allowed to play computer games had better results in mathematics quiz
when compared to those who were not allowed or had little interest in playing them.
To conclude, the gaming industry has been a pain from parent’s point of view as they
perceive it to cause a deteriorating effect on their child’s health. But, with correct measures
these games can do wonders for their child. We need to understand that gaming is meant to
be fun and should be allowed by guardians as a leisure activity for their offspring as it helps
to increase their mental capabilities and prepare them for their future in more meaningful
way.
Essay topics: Some believe that training is necessary to be a good teacher, others think that
teachers don’t need a training course. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Training plays a vital role in overall development of any professional. In case of teachers, it is
thought by some that getting trained is not essential for the reason that this type of profession
does not requires to get trained and hence can be avoided. Whereas, for others, it is of an
utmost importance as it not only provides a methodology to follow, but also generates unique
ways in which students can be taught. In my opinion, the latter one proves to be more fruitful
and should be followed.
Owing to the procedure followed, trainers can easily impart basic lessons in a meaningful
way. In other words, they can make learning an easy process by dividing the overall course
structure and following up one topic at a time. Consequently, this helps in saving time and
makes learners focus precisely to important things. To exemplify, Indian Business School
recently came up with mandatory training of 2 months for new faculty. This practice helped
them in communication process with students and they were able to pass their knowledge in
an enhanced manner, leading to an increase in better final results. Additionally, this process
results in creation of new ways of teaching. It helps in origination of innovative methods by
brainstorming, which in turn, can be more effective. Furthermore, it may have a positive
approach, as well as a fresh idea of learning things with wider perspective and henceforth,
can turn out to be a major asset in terms of teaching as a profession.
Coming to the part wherein it is felt by some that training need not be present in education
process, is perceived by them as redundant. It is a result of prolonged traditional way of
practicing, which has made these people adamant. To illustrate, government teachers in India
are not required to go through a general training process of how to teach. When asked them to
follow up a new regime of getting trained first, they instantly declared an all India strike and
somehow government dropped this idea. As, a result, students of government schools are yet
to make a mark in educational sector.
To conclude, a good number of people still tend to follow the easy path of traditional way of
doing things and not indulge in a required training process, which can cause detrimental
impact on learning of children. If not trained, these individuals may lack basic understanding
of how to teach productively. And according to me, the idea of a proper step by step guide to
teach should be made compulsory.
Essay topics: Some parents and teachers think that children’s behavior be strictly controlled.
While some think that children should be free to behave. Discuss both views and give your
opinion.
Different schools of thought exist among teachers and parents about how children’s
behaviour should be controlled. While some believe that there should be strict control, others
are more lenient on the control. There are important reasons behind both these thoughts.
Firstly, children do not have enough knowledge and awareness about their surroundings and
do not anticipate and recognize the dangers that may ensue. Moreover, they are not capable
of facing or handling such incident upon the occurrence of such unfortunate event. Secondly,
as children grow up they are expected to have a certain accepted level of behaviour with
kindness, respect, sympathy and decency. As not all children are alike, sometimes parents
and teachers may have to resort to strict actions in order to discipline the child and carve a
noble human being out of him or her. Therefore, it is reasonable for some people to think that
strict control of behavior is important to keep them out of danger as well as to discipline and
teach certain lessons of life.
On the contrary, children are free thinkers and they have ample energy and curiosity that
needs nurturing by letting them explore and experience the world outside without restrictions
for them to learn the good, the bad and the ugly by and within themselves. For that to happen,
they need more freedom to do and discover things on their own. But, that must be done with
proper guidance and supervision with great care and attention. There are enough studies done
world over to support that evidence.
In conclusion, it is important to note that each child is unique in their knowledge, behaviour
and attitudes, and the level of supervision and guidance they need in order to become a good
human being varies accordingly. There is no “one way” to teach and discipline children. It
must be done with great care and insight on to that particular child’s mentality and capability
and appropriately to the particular situation.
Essay topics: Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal.
some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion
Growth in the economy is one of the main denominators of a country’s development as
believed by many governments all over the world. But there are many other indicators that
measure the growth of a country as a whole, such as social development, health indices,
agricultural and industrial, sustainable development etc. However, in my opinion, economic
development should be the most important one among them.
Firstly, one of the main denominators of the country’s development is their Gross Domestic
Product (GDP), which is used to compare and rank countries in the development scale. In
further explanation, it is the sum of values of all the products and services produced by a
country in that particular year. Therefore, it represents most of all the other parameters of
development in all production and services categories. Secondly, another main denominator
is the Per-capita Income, which is the average income of a citizen in that country in a
particular year. Obviously, if every citizen gets a good income, invariably the health, social
and other parameters would also develop proportionately. Thirdly, if a country’s economy is
developed, undoubtedly the industries, transport, infrastructure, defense and security etc.
would also develop as the government is able to spend money for those area as well as to help
the poor and helpless people of the country.
On the contrary, growth of economic indices would represent the data as a whole and it may
not represent individual citizen of the country. Therefore, even if the per-capita income is
high in the country, it does not mean that every citizen enjoys the same income. There would
invariably be a spectrum of people from ultra-rich to poor and homeless people. Similarly,
development in other parameters like social, health etc. would also not be a representation of
the individual citizen, but as an average or as a whole.
In conclusion, I firmly believe the development of the economy should be the main focus of
any government as it would affect the development of all the other parameters also both
directly and indirectly towards the betterment of them. At the same time government should
not neglect any other area also, because that would again affect the development of the
economy negatively both directly and indirectly.
Some people think success in life comes from hard work and determination. Others
think money and appearance are more important. Discuss both views and give your
opinion
It is true that people have a lot of ways to achieve success in their life. While some people
think money and appearance are two factors affecting to people's success, I would argue that
people can reach a peak of their career when they work hard and have determination.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why finance and physical beauty are important
contributors to success in life. First reason is that money enables people reaching their deep
desires like power and frame. For example, if people have a great deal of money, they have
countless opportunities to progress rapidly in their career or being well-known in the
community that they desired. Furthermore, personal appearance is one of the crucial factors
impacting achievement. For instance, it would be a good chance for candidates to seek a job
if they indicate their confident body posture or wearing clothing apart from great skills and
experiences.
On the other hand, it is undeniable that hard working and resolution are necessary features
which are pivotal to ensure success. Firstly, hard work helps people gain some valuable
experiences in aspects of life. For example, if young student practices several times some
kinds of assignment in college and home, they are likely to minimize the risk of repeating the
same mistakes so they have the tendency to get high scores in the formal exam. Secondly,
determination gives us the motivation to set up goals which become the foundation of
success. As a result, this is an essential skill to allow people overcome the complex problems
in all situation and always keep moving forward to reach the long-term goals.
The world’s most urgent problem is caused by over-population. Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that many countries in the world are facing with one of the most serious problem,
which is massive increase in world’s population. Personally, I completely agree with this
view because of its negative effect on human development and environment.
There are a variety of reasons why the dramatic growth of population in the world brings a
harmful effect on the quality of human’s life and global budget as well. Firstly, over-
population phenomenon has resulted in the lack of accommodation for a large number of
people, especially with those living in crowded cities and metropolitan areas. This reason
because the small number of available housing are not able to meet the demand for the need
of living facility. As a result, if people do not have any shelter, they mostly will build an
illegal house on the prohibited sectors such as riverbank or top of the hill which are
dangerous for them. Furthermore, the unemployment rate would be likely to higher because
of joblessness that profoundly affected on not only world’s economy which makes it go down
but also social issues , in particularly is the rising of violent criminal in the community.
Consequently, with the world’s economy is stagnant and undeveloped, the whole society has
witnessed the majority of citizens who turn into offenders with the hopes of earning enough
money for making end meets.
Apart from the practical concerns expressed above, I believe that over-population would lead
to several issues which are associated with living environment. Firstly, some consequences
including air pollution, contamination of water or land which stem from the massive number
of transportation users or the arising of industrial areas. For example, over-using a mean of
transport mode burning fossil fuel, applying chemical fertilisers into the field of agricultural
and discharging toxic waste into water resources all lead to greenhouse gas emission that
causes environmental damage severely. Secondly, some endangered species of animal would
be on the brink of extinction if there is no longer living inhabitant. This would mean that
people are cutting down tree or even killing animals for living purposes as building houses,
schools, hospitals, modern facilities and being main food resources for the massive number of
civilians in the world.
For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social
development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is too much controversial debate about whether teachers or parents have more
significant influence on fostering children’s intellect and individual characteristics. While I
agree that teacher plays a vital role in the growth of children, I also believe that parents’ roles
are essential to facilitate children’s comprehensive development.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why teachers’ role is critically important in
enhancing the ability of children’s intellectual and social growth. One reason is that education
environment in school allows a large number of students to socialize and interact with other
peers through recreational activities or events. For example, during the school years, there are
a lot of extra-curriculum activities for youngsters, which will cultivate children’s
expressiveness, improve communication skill and show their intelligence on various fields.
Furthermore, it would be necessary for young students with the presence of professional
teachers or guided person in education system. This is because those who give them countless
opportunities to promote personal ability such as problem-solving, logical thinking and
reasoning. For instance, in classroom, teacher has enabled their students to expose their
opinion, learn how to tackle complex problems or hold useful discussion among other
students, which are important things for the cultivation of an academically and socially
successful child.
On the other hand, parental involvement can have an equally positive impact on children’s
cognitive ability and social development. Firstly, parents are those who supply their
offsprings with their chance of developing a relationship, communicating and interacting with
others. A healthy relationship and strong sense of community would be improved
dramatically by enjoying various social activities, for example. Secondly, homeschool
parents can dedicate most of their time to delivering high-quality and valuable life lessons ,
so the children would be able to progress easily and naturally. For instance, during formation
years, parents become a good model role for their kids to follow them, they are able to not
only mimic their parents in their language but also learn the way that respond to all situation
in aspects of their life.
In conclusion, both teachers and parents play an equally important role when it comes to
nurturing children’s personal traits and social skills.
The users of social media, such as Facebook, Twitter, are replacing face-to-face contact in
this century. Do you think the advantages of this way outweigh the disadvantages?
It is argued by some that advanced technology equipment in communication, especially
social media has a negative effect on the direct interaction among people. In my opinion, the
disadvantages of this trend outweigh the advantage.
There is no doubt that people derive substantial benefits from gaining access to the social
networks. Firstly, the dominant of using technological devices gives users countless
opportunities to exchange socially. For example, Facebook, Twitters and Zalo are platforms
which allow people instant messaging and one can easily contact others by transforming
information into Facebook, Messenger regardless of geographical barriers. It is convenient
for those who live far away from their loved ones. Secondly, communication facilities
available on Facebook are powerful tools in enhancing the productivity's work. For instance,
in the field of economy, business managers can easily provide customer service, answer sales
question and even upload new brands of the company through social networking service. As
a result, this can result in quickly and efficiently exchanging information rather than holding
the private meeting.
However, there are some existing drawbacks of communication equipment abuse to direct
interaction in real society. In the digital age, with the emergence of other social networking
websites, people are disappearing and replacing the traditional way of interaction with
electronic ones. For example, it is common to see many youths make cycle virtual friend
online via Facebook or Zalo instead of gathering at a small shop for their meeting. This can
lead to isolating people from other social members, weakened the sense of community and
even get a serious feeling of pain and mental health problems when making strange people.
Secondly, the ability of people such as literacy skills and social etiquettes are gradually
declining due to the lack of the informal way of transmitting the message and social
exposure. For example, the majority of youngsters prefer making their feelings and emotions
by using emoticons and abbreviations rather than expressing themselves through their verbal
or gestures.
In conclusion, I believe that this trend brings more disadvantages than advantages it brings. It
is advisable that people should take into consideration in less using of modern
communication equipment.
Some people think that developing countries need financial help from international
organizations. Others think that it is practical aid and advice that is needed. Discuss both
views and give your opinion.
It is true that people have different opinions about measures to assist poor nations. While
some people think that financial support from international bodies is essential for those
countries, I would argue that practical aid and advice are more effective assistance.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that financial aid has a positive impact on developing
countries combat starvation and poverty. Firstly, external monetary flow from international
investment enables local and national authorities to improve infrastructure by upgrading and
expanding public transport provision, building more interstate roads and investing in hospital
facilities. As a result, thanks to the overwhelming support, it is convenient for citizens in
those place to avoid traffic congestion or minimize the risk of disease. Secondly, foreign cash
injections make a great contribution to creating more job for struggle residents living in rural
areas or harsh conditions. If financial aids from authorities focus on developing a wide range
of different jobs in the society, especially in poor countries, people who have whether or not
degree are able to earn money to make end meets.
On the other hand, I strongly believe that practical aid and advice are effective solutions to
maintain sustainable growth in the long-term. Firstly, undeveloped nations need experts in the
field of science, law, and medicine in order to encourage their development. However,
scientists, lawyers, and doctors can only be trained and professional and systematic education
and training programs are therefore more practice and suitable in the context of poor
countries. Secondly, without this funding, the poor will be incapable of maintaining the
economic development and independence. Therefore, it is better to give proper advice and
guidance by providing opportunities for students from developing countries to learn
comprehensive knowledge and experience from prosperous ones. For example, some
prestigious Japanese universities offer a large number of scholarships for million of students
in the area to enrich their professional understanding.
The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful
purpose and can be damaging. Do you agree or disagree?
It is true that some people believe that advertisement is useless or detrimental to their society.
While I consider that this would drawbacks of this industry, I believe that it should not totally
prohibit.
On the one hand, there are a variety of reasons why advertisement has the adverse influence
on consumers. Firstly, the growing popularity of violence advertising on television has
resulted in an increase of crime rate in the society. If advertisements involved in violence are
broadcasted during the prime time television every day, children could easily learn how to
turn into crime in the future. Secondly, a number of advertisements which promote various
products such as toys, aimed mainly at a target audience of children and adolescents. For
example, many children easily swayed by commercial advertisements such as milk or
cookies, so they put pressure on their parents to buy goods impulsively.
On the other hand, I disagree that local and national authorities should impose an official ban
on all forms of advertising because of some undeniable benefits to the public. Firstly, the
advertising industry has an important role in the growth of the economic nation. Without the
presence of advertisements, economic of the whole country could severely suffer because
people who used to work in the advertising industry are now unemployed. As a result, this
would lead to a rise in the unemployment proportion. Secondly, millions of companies take
full of advantages of advertisement developments in order to maximize profits with a hope
that it may attract potential customers in the short term. For instance, in the field of the
beverage industry, most companies try to promote their type of different beverages with a
high quality as well as a reasonable price through social media or television. By adopting this
policy, companies can reach their goal as earning more money.
In conclusion, although there are some negative effects of advertisements, I consider there is
no need to ban it completely
Some people think that good health is very important to every person, so medical service
should not be run by profit-making companies. Do the advantages of private healthcare
outweigh the disadvantages?
It is true that medical service should not be operated by profit-oriented private companies.
While I accept that there are some drawbacks, I think that these are outweighed by the
benefits of this trend.
On the one hand, there are some drawbacks of operating in private healthcare services.
Firstly, the cost of treatment in private healthcare is likely to be higher than in ones
subsidized by the government. For example, patients who live in remote and rural areas are
not able to afford prescription charges in state hospitals because of the availability of latest
machine and professional doctors. Therefore, this leads to further the gap between the rich
and the poor. Secondly, it will be difficult to control treatment process in private hospitals.
For example, a large number of unnecessary tests performed to raise the cost of treatment and
earning for unethical doctors.
On the other hand, it seems to me that patients should choose private healthcare institutions to
operate individual health because of some undeniable advantages. Firstly, the growth of
private healthcare centers lessens the burden of state-owned healthcare institutions in taking
care of the public's health. For instance, in terms of the overload of patients and finance, the
rapidly rising of state hospitals reduce the pressure on state-owned health institutions.
Secondly, it's obvious advantages is state healthcare services make a great contribution to
limit the rise in the crime rate. For instance, most specialist clinics offering treatment and
advice are required to help people who are addicted to drugs.
In conclusion, I believe the there are many advantages for people who operate in private
healthcare institutions, although this decision has some disadvantages.
Some countries achieve international sports by building specialized facilities to train top
athletes, instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use. Do you think this is
positive or negative development?
Nowadays, international sports games become a playing field for national sports industry to
showcase the best personal talents and bring home honor and admiration. Some countries are
willing to provide specialized facilities to train athletes skill, instead of fitness facilities for
public use. While I personally think this is a positive development, it also has some
drawbacks.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why the government pumps the huge amount of
money into a select and upgrade specialized sports facilities to serve for training professional
skills. First reason is that expenditure on training athletes team for abroad coaching could be
reduced significantly, thanks to the budget of the nation. For example, Japan has long been
known for its gold medal football team in Olympic due to their appropriate method of
training and tremendous investment in infrastructures. Another reason is that sufficient sports
infrastructures have a positive impact on youngsters who are more likely to pursue sports
professions. Therefore, this will result in potential human resources who make a great
contribution to national sports industry in many years.
On the other hand, extremely focusing on investing the quality of sports equipment has a
negative influence on social problems. Firstly, training sectors accounted for the large space
of society as well as wasting the enormous cost of capital. Consequently, people will have
fewer places to go for exercises and play their favorite sports such as swimming or
badminton and make national economic to be fall. Secondly, the lack of public sports
facilities may unfortunately increase chances of people leading a sedentary lifestyle which is
a major factor in health problems such as obesity, diabetes and heart diseases. For instance,
because young people have to use few and old public facilities that it could not cater for their
demand so they tend to spend time playing games or chatting with other people. As a result,
they have to suffer from eyes and the risk of mental disorder.
In conclusion, although the building of specialized training centers for top athletes brings
some benefit for sport national industry in some ways, it seems to me it has disadvantages
problems for society. It is suggested that a balancing act is required from the authorities to
minimize the potential drawbacks of the issue.
Today more and more people are using mobile phones and computers. Thus, people are
losing the ability to communicate face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that mobile phones and computers play an integral part in our lives. While I accept
that the development of technology may meet our demand for living, I believe that it also
could diminish people's communication ability.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that high-tech appliances are playing a vital role in almost
every aspect of life. Firstly, technology gives users countless opportunities to make friends
from various countries without traveling across the world. Therefore, they could save a great
deal of time and money by doing this. Secondly, the availability of high-quality digital
devices makes a great contribution to enhancing the level of job performance. For example,
in the worlds of business and education, video conferencing has enabled to exchange ideas,
discuss about work and help employee complete task instead of wasting too much time to
arrange a meeting.
On the other hand, there are several reasons why mobile phones and computers have to take
responsibility for the decline of people's communication skills. First reason is that because of
extremely focusing on cell phones or computers, people are likely to use less time with their
true friends and their relatives. As a result, they will not know how to build a strong
relationship and how to manage conflicts. Furthermore, by using mobile phones for a long
time, people have a hard time mastering vital soft skills. For instance, in many families,
young people have more tendency to chat with someone they do not even know and may be
dangerous as criminal through technological devices, while their parents would like to watch
TV in order to update breaking news. Consequently, teenagers can not strengthen the
relationship between the members of family as well as limiting the verbal skill.
In conclusion, although technology brings some convenience to people, it seems to me that
the usage of mobile phones and computers can be a reduction in the capability of
communication among people.
Some people say that all young people should have full-time education until they are 18 years
old. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is true that education for youngsters is a controversial issue in many countries. The debate
focuses on the necessity of offering full time teaching for students before reaching the age of
majority. While I accept some benefits this trend offers, I do not consider that students should
study full-time.
On the one hand, there are a variety of reasons why children who are less than 18 years old
should study full-time at school. Firstly, full-time education allows young people broaden
their own knowledge about different fields through a wide range of subjects such as math,
literature or history. As a result, basic knowledge will help a group of student fulfills essential
skills which serve in the future and give them countless opportunities to solve the complex
problems in daily life. Secondly, teenagers have more tendency to develop violent behavior
because they witness frequently violent act through the internet or games. Therefore, young
children will more likely to turn into crimes, causing the damaging effect on the society so
studying full-time may reduce their time wasted on these doings and also lessen the burden
for the society.
On the other hand, I disagree that teenagers should be required to study full-time. One reason
is that the incredible pressure of studying at school accounts for a great deal of how
teenagers's spend their time so they easily suffer from stress and depression. For example,
children in many developed countries like Korean or Japan become mentally disordered or
have the nervous breakdown because they have to complete a large number of assignments.
Another important factor is that adolescents should be encouraged to watch some kinds of TV
shows which not only relax under pressure on homework but also develop their practical
skills. This can bring positive impact on studying at school.
In conclusion, it seems to me that young learners should balance their timetable by taking
part in outdoor activities rather than studying day by day.
Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport why is it not popular
in many places? How to increase its popularity
Although riding a bicycle is a better way to protect the environment than using other types of
vehicles, it is less likely to attract the most people. A range of reasons are identified and some
solutions could be proposed to address this issue and promote the usage of bicycles.
On the one hand, there are many strong reasons why using the bicycle is limited to people in
many big cities. Firstly, modern life is becoming much busier than in the past, individuals
nowadays have difficulty to manage their time with the use of the bicycle. As a result, people
prefer to travel other types of vehicles such as car, subway, and bus in order to save time and
physically demanding. Secondly, people who commute by cycling have more tendency to
face with health problems such as lung cancer or respiratory disease. This results in the urban
areas where often produce the amount of gas emission released into the air. Finally,
unpredictable danger could be happened when cyclists have to share lanes with other means
of transport. For example, commuters by bike are likely to avoid weigh vehicles as the
container, so they have no space to free moving in the street.
On the other hand, governments play a vital role in adopting the strict policy. First solution is
that it is important to increase people's awareness of saving our living environment. For
instance, government authorities should introduce campaigns to propagate the harmful effects
of fuel vehicles on the public health and encourage citizens to attempt to cycle as much as
possible. Another measurement is to upgrade and expand transport infrastructure, especially
road systems and create dedicated cycle lanes to prevent unexpected accidents. Furthermore,
the restriction of a large number of private car by making it more costly. This can be done by
increasing petrol price or raising taxes on these vehicles before going to central zones.
In conclusion, there are several reasons why bicycles are becoming less common in today's
world, I believe that solutions would be produced to promote this environmentally friendly
means of transport.
The best way for government to solve the problem of traffic congestion is providing free
public transport in 24 hours per day, and seven days a week. To what extent do you agree or
disagree?
It is true that traffic congestion is becoming a controversial issue in many major cities.
Although I agree that government can provide free public transport to address this problem, I
do not consider that it is the best solution.
On the one hand, there are many great advantages from serving transport system. By adopting
this policy, governments, as well as many nations around the world saw a significant decline
in the number of cars which used on the street. As a result, it is the beneficial way for society
to reduce the risk of the accident which occurs frequently on the roads and cut down a large
amount of emission gas which released into the atmosphere. Furthermore, using public
transport allow commuters to save much money paying for gas, parking fees and taxes. For
instance, if you use the private vehicle, you will have to pay taxes for fuels and maintenance
service. By the restriction of wasting money, you can spend the amount of money on various
personal purposes.
On the other hand, the government should take into consideration about some disadvantages
before applying a free public transport system. Firstly, traffic congestion only happens during
rush hours due to a large number of commuters, so it would be a waste of money to supply
free transport at night. In addition, there are important fields in the society which need
investment such as building or upgrading transport infrastructure. For example, they should
spend a large money to repair and broaden the road so drivers can easily go faster without
worrying about any troubles. Secondly, people who commute by public transport may suffer
the variety of dangers from criminals. As a consequence, the number of bus or train which
increase rapidly at the same time can result in raising the crime rate. By illegal activities of
offenders, residents can be threated to their property or their life.
In conclusion, it seems to me that governments should serve appropriately free public
transport as well as combine with other effective measures to tackle traffic congestion.
One key reason for this move away from more traditional training
methods is the fact that e-learning offers businesses the opportunity
to reduce their expenditure significantly. Providing face-to-face
training can be exorbitantly expensive, particularly in terms of travel
costs and lost productivity, and online courses can greatly reduce
the expense of keeping employees well-informed and up-to-date.
Computer-based training renders geographical location irrelevant
and this eliminates the need to pay an instructor to travel to your
office or cover the cost of sending your employees to a training
centre. It also minimises the amount of time wasted. From a purely
financial perspective, there is no doubt that this shift to digital
learning makes perfect sense.
Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and
more creativity than reading. To what extent do you agree? Use
reasons and specific examples to explain your answer.
Parents throughout the world place spend time reading with their
offspring to prepare them for school where their literacy skills are
further developed; however, recent research suggests that focusing
on reading at an early age can be detrimental, and participating in
fun activities would be far more beneficial. I am a strong advocate
of this approach, and the benefits of it will be covered in this essay.
A fundamental reason for this is that there is no biological age for
reading, and pushing infants to acquire this skill before they are
ready could have repercussions. For example, in the UK, many
boys are reluctant readers, possibly because of being forced to
read, and this turned them off reading. By focusing on other
activities and developing other skills such as creativity and
imagination, when they are ready to read, they usually acquire this
skill rapidly. In addition, the importance of encouraging creativity
and developing a child’s imagination must be acknowledged.
Through play, youngsters develop social and cognitive skills, for
example, they are more likely to learn vocabulary through context
rather than learning it from a book.
The causes for the decrease in the quality of life are paradoxically
the prosperity endowed on such metropolitan centres. Their growth
is largely due to the increase of opportunities on offer, which in turn
increases their attractiveness, essentially they are trapped in a
positive self-reinforcing cycle. However, this eventually leads to a
decrease in the quality of life as the city can experience
overcrowding, exorbitant property prices, and increased
vulnerability to terrorist attacks. For example the density of London
makes it a more efficient place to attack, when compared to a
smaller city such as Bradford. Therefore, due to continuous growth
and prosperity, urban citizens, especially the less well off, often
experience a lower standard of living.
The habit of sharing, retweeting and liking also ensures that these
adverts get around, quite fast. As such, when an advert does reach
your news feed you have already probably seen it on your friend’s
news feed. The truth is, adverts are a form of information and with
the age of the internet, information spreads faster than a wild fire.
Therefore, it only makes sense that in the era and age of
technology, globalization and the need to be trendy, social media
marketing can influence what consumers buy.