Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Nature
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
For other uses, see Nature (disambiguation).
"Natural" redirects here. For other uses, see Natural (disambiguation).
Lightning strikes during the eruption of the Galunggung volcano, West Java, in
1982
Nature on Wikipedia view
Contents
Nature on Wikipedia view
1Earth
o 1.1Geology
1.1.1Geological evolution
o 1.2Historical perspective
2Atmosphere, climate, and weather
3Water on Earth
o 3.1Oceans
o 3.2Lakes
3.2.1Ponds
o 3.3Rivers
o 3.4Streams
4Ecosystems
o 4.1Wilderness
5Life
o 5.1Evolution
o 5.2Microbes
o 5.3Plants and animals
6Human interrelationship
o 6.1Aesthetics and beauty
7Matter and energy
8Beyond Earth
9See also
10Notes and references
11External links
Earth[edit]
Nature timeline
This box:
view
talk
edit
-13 —
–
-12 —
–
-11 —
–
Nature on Wikipedia view
-10 —
–
-9 —
–
-8 —
–
-7 —
–
-6 —
–
-5 —
–
-4 —
–
-3 —
–
-2 —
–
-1 —
–
0—
Reionization
Matter-dominated
era
accelerated expansion
water
Single-celled life
photosynthesis
Nature on Wikipedia view
Multicellular
life
Vertebrates
Dark Ages
←
Universe (−13.80)
←
Earliest stars
←
Earliest galaxy
←
Earliest quasar/sbh
←
Omega Centauri
←
Andromeda Galaxy
←
Milky Way spirals
←
Alpha Centauri
←
Earth/SolarSystem
←
Earliest life
←
Earliest oxygen
←
Atmospheric oxygen
Nature on Wikipedia view
←
Sexual reproduction
←
Earliest plants
←
Cambrian explosion
←
Earliest mammals
←
Earliest apes
L
i
f
e
Clickable
(billion years ago)
Plankton inhabit oceans, seas and lakes, and have existed in various forms for at
least 2 billion years.[14]
Continents formed, then broke up and reformed as the surface of Earth reshaped
over hundreds of millions of years, occasionally combining to make
a supercontinent. Roughly 750 million years ago, the earliest known
supercontinent Rodinia, began to break apart. The continents later recombined
to form Pannotia which broke apart about 540 million years ago, then
finally Pangaea, which broke apart about 180 million years ago.[15]
During the Neoproterozoic era, freezing temperatures covered much of the
Earth in glaciers and ice sheets. This hypothesis has been termed the "Snowball
Earth", and it is of particular interest as it precedes the Cambrian explosion in
which multicellular life forms began to proliferate about 530–540 million years
ago.[16]
Since the Cambrian explosion there have been five distinctly identifiable mass
extinctions.[17] The last mass extinction occurred some 66 million years ago,
when a meteorite collision probably triggered the extinction of the non-
avian dinosaurs and other large reptiles, but spared small animals such
as mammals. Over the past 66 million years, mammalian life diversified.[18]
Several million years ago, a species of small African ape gained the ability to
stand upright.[14] The subsequent advent of human life, and the development of
agriculture and further civilization allowed humans to affect the Earth more
rapidly than any previous life form, affecting both the nature and quantity of
other organisms as well as global climate. By comparison, the Great
Oxygenation Event, produced by the proliferation of algae during
the Siderian period, required about 300 million years to culminate.
The present era is classified as part of a mass extinction event, the Holocene
extinction event, the fastest ever to have occurred.[19][20] Some, such as E. O.
Wilson of Harvard University, predict that human destruction of
Nature on Wikipedia view
the biosphere could cause the extinction of one-half of all species in the next
100 years.[21] The extent of the current extinction event is still being researched,
debated and calculated by biologists.[22][23][24]
Water on Earth[edit]
Nature on Wikipedia view
Lush green Aravalli Mountain Range in the Desert country – Rajasthan, India.
A wonder how such greenery can exist in hot Rajasthan, a place well known for
its Thar Desert
Peñas Blancas, part of the Bosawás Biosphere Reserve. Located northeast of the
city of Jinotega in Northeastern Nicaragua.
Central to the ecosystem concept is the idea that living organisms interact with
every other element in their local environment. Eugene Odum, a founder of
ecology, stated: "Any unit that includes all of the organisms (ie: the
Nature on Wikipedia view
"community") in a given area interacting with the physical environment so that
a flow of energy leads to clearly defined trophic structure, biotic diversity, and
material cycles (i.e.: exchange of materials between living and nonliving parts)
within the system is an ecosystem."[41] Within the ecosystem, species are
connected and dependent upon one another in the food chain, and exchange
energy and matter between themselves as well as with their environment.[42] The
human ecosystem concept is based on the human/nature dichotomy and the idea
that all species are ecologically dependent on each other, as well as with the
abiotic constituents of their biotope.[43]
A smaller unit of size is called a microecosystem. For example, a microsystem
can be a stone and all the life under it. A macroecosystem might involve a
whole ecoregion, with its drainage basin.[44]
Wilderness[edit]
Life[edit]
Life timeline
This box:
Nature on Wikipedia view
view
talk
edit
-4500 —
–
-4000 —
–
-3500 —
–
-3000 —
–
-2500 —
–
-2000 —
–
-1500 —
–
-1000 —
–
-500 —
–
0—
water
Single-celled
life
photosynthesis
Eukaryotes
Multicellular
life
Nature on Wikipedia view
Arthropods Molluscs
Plants
Dinosaurs
Mammals
Flowers
Birds
Primates
←
Earth (−4540)
←
Earliest water
←
Earliest life
←
Earliest oxygen
←
Nature on Wikipedia view
Atmospheric oxygen
←
Oxygen crisis
←
Sexual reproduction
←
Earliest plants
←
Earliest animals
←
Ediacara biota
←
Cambrian explosion
←
Tetrapoda
←
Earliest apes
P
h
a
n
e
r
o
z
o
i
c
Nature on Wikipedia view
P
r
o
t
e
r
o
z
o
i
c
A
r
c
h
e
a
n
H
a
d
e
a
n
Pongola
Huronian
Cryogenian
Andean
Karoo
Quaternary
Ice Ages
Clickable
Nature on Wikipedia view
(million years ago)
Human interrelationship[edit]
Hominin timeline
This box:
view
Nature on Wikipedia view
talk
edit
-10 —
–
-9 —
–
-8 —
–
-7 —
–
-6 —
–
-5 —
–
-4 —
–
-3 —
–
-2 —
–
-1 —
–
0—
Hominini
Nakalipithecus
Ouranopithecus
Sahelanthropus
Orrorin
Nature on Wikipedia view
Ardipithecus
Australopithecus
Homo habilis
Homo erectus
H. heidelbergensis
Homo sapiens
Neanderthals
←
Earlier apes
←
Gorilla split
←
Possibly bipedal
←
Chimpanzee split
←
Earliest bipedal
←
Stone tools
←
Exit from Africa
←
Earliest fire use
←
Earliest cooking
←
Earliest clothes
Nature on Wikipedia view
←
Modern humans
P
l
e
i
s
t
o
c
e
n
e
P
l
i
o
c
e
n
e
M
i
o
c
e
n
e
i
Nature on Wikipedia view
n
s
(million years ago)
(See also: Life timeline, and Nature timeline.)
Despite their natural beauty, the secluded valleys along the Na Pali Coast in
Hawaii are heavily modified by introduced invasive species such as She-oak.
Although humans comprise only a minuscule proportion of the total
living biomass on Earth, the human effect on nature is disproportionately large.
Because of the extent of human influence, the boundaries between what humans
regard as nature and "made environments" is not clear cut except at the
extremes. Even at the extremes, the amount of natural environment that is free
of discernible human influence is diminishing at an increasingly rapid pace.
The development of technology by the human race has allowed the
greater exploitation of natural resources and has helped to alleviate some of the
risk from natural hazards. In spite of this progress, however, the fate of
human civilization remains closely linked to changes in the environment. There
exists a highly complex feedback loop between the use of advanced technology
and changes to the environment that are only slowly becoming
understood.[72] Man-made threats to the Earth's natural environment include
pollution, deforestation, and disasters such as oil spills. Humans have
contributed to the extinction of many plants and animals.
Humans employ nature for both leisure and economic activities. The acquisition
of natural resources for industrial use remains a sizable component of the
world's economic system.[73][74] Some activities, such as hunting and fishing, are
used for both sustenance and leisure, often by different people. Agriculture was
first adopted around the 9th millennium BCE. Ranging from food production to
energy, nature influences economic wealth.
Nature on Wikipedia view
Although early humans gathered uncultivated plant materials for food and
employed the medicinal properties of vegetation for healing,[75] most modern
human use of plants is through agriculture. The clearance of large tracts of land
for crop growth has led to a significant reduction in the amount available
of forestation and wetlands, resulting in the loss of habitat for many plant and
animal species as well as increased erosion.[76]
Aesthetics and beauty[edit]
The first few hydrogen atom electron orbitals shown as cross-sections with
color-coded probability density
Main articles: Matter and Energy
Some fields of science see nature as matter in motion, obeying certain laws of
nature which science seeks to understand. For this reason the most fundamental
science is generally understood to be "physics"—the name for which is still
recognizable as meaning that it is the "study of nature".
Matter is commonly defined as the substance of which physical objects are
composed. It constitutes the observable universe. The visible components of the
universe are now believed to compose only 4.9 percent of the total mass. The
remainder is believed to consist of 26.8 percent cold dark matter and 68.3
percent dark energy.[80] The exact arrangement of these components is still
unknown and is under intensive investigation by physicists.
The behaviour of matter and energy throughout the observable universe appears
to follow well-defined physical laws. These laws have been employed to
produce cosmological models that successfully explain the structure and the
evolution of the universe we can observe. The mathematical expressions of the
laws of physics employ a set of twenty physical constants[81] that appear to be
Nature on Wikipedia view
static across the observable universe.[82] The values of these constants have been
carefully measured, but the reason for their specific values remains a mystery.
Beyond Earth[edit]
Planets of the Solar System (Sizes to scale, distances and illumination not to
scale)
See also[edit]
Book: Nature
Force of nature
Human nature
Natural history
Naturalism
Natural landscape
Natural law
Natural resource
Natural science
Natural theology
Nature reserve
Nature timeline
Nature versus nurture
Nature worship
Naturism
Rewilding
Media:
Mother Nature
Nature (philosophy)
Naturalism, any of several philosophical stances, typically those descended
from materialism and pragmatism that do not distinguish the supernatural
from nature;[87] this includes the methodological naturalism of natural
science, which makes the methodological assumption that observable events
in nature are explained only by natural causes, without assuming either the
existence or non-existence of the supernatural
Balance of nature (biological fallacy), a discredited concept of natural
equilibrium in predator–prey dynamics
External links[edit]
Natureat Wikipedia's sister projects
Astronomy portal
Earth sciences portal
Ecology portal
Environment portal
Science portal
Categories:
Nature
Environmental science
Environmental social science concepts
Main topic articles
Navigation menu
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Article
Talk
Read
Edit
View history
Search
Go
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Nature on Wikipedia view
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
In other projects
Wikimedia Commons
Wikibooks
Wikiquote
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
Languages
বাাংলা
ગુજરાતી
हिन्दी
ಕನ್ನ ಡ
മലയാളം
मराठी
தமிழ்
తెలుగు
اردو
137 more
Edit links
This page was last edited on 2 December 2019, at 10:20 (UTC).
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License;
additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of
Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia
Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Nature on Wikipedia view
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Statistics
Cookie statement
Mobile view
The new MoEFCC bill is all too quick to monetise environmental impacts
caused by mining, port and other industrial projects
Posted on November 20, 2015by admin
Even before the new government came to power in India in mid 2014, the
narrative of environment regulations being antithetical to economic growth had
become a matter of national debate. Not surprisingly then, since June 2014 there
has been a roll out of amendments to procedures that determine environmental
approvals to industrial and infrastructure projects. On the one hand, the
environment ministry has showcased its achievements in the unhindered
Nature on Wikipedia view
clearance of projects. On the other it has sent out signals there would strict
action against non-compliance of law.
But this is not the only concern with the proposed Bill. The close nexus of the
actors involved in the construction of the Bill and the content of what is
proposed both require a keen scrutiny.
Appointing consultants
The story of this amendment Bill goes back to the TSR Subramanian
Committee that was set up to review six environment laws last year. The
Committee’s work was not only criticized for its report but also for the selective
meetings it held as its ‘consultations’ by groups such as the Legal Initiative for
Forest and Environment. In July 2015, the Department-related Parliamentary
Standing Committee on Science & Technology, Environment & Forests
strongly questioned committee’s process and recommended that a new
committee be set up to carry out the review.
Ernst and Young is a multinational firm that has had a history of doing
Environmental Impact Assessments and consultancies in India since the 1990s.
One of their EIA reports related to the Dandeli Mini Hydel Project in
Karnataka, as revealed by the Environment Support Group in 2000, was
a plagarised one.
AMSS is the largest law firms in India with expertise in corporate law with
clients like Vedanta and Reliance as well as having appeared for legal
cases faced by the Adanis on matters of fuel pricing and managing their high
profile acquisitions of the Dhamra Port in Orissa and Lanco thermal project in
Udupi.
Putting aside the matter of the drafters of the bill, the contents of the proposed
amendments are hardly inspiring. It seems clear that this elaborate process
hasn’t quite delivered in favour of those affected by environmental violations
and damages. The scope of work of the Request for Proposal and the Terms of
Reference requires many studies to be done to provide evidence for
recommendations. But the amendment bill is devoid of any such evidence
supporting the proposed clauses.
It leaves a hole in the place of a solid and well argued justification and method
for creating a new taxonomy of environmental damages or impacts of
environmental violations as ‘minor’, ‘substantial and ‘non-substantial’. T
Nature on Wikipedia view
Mohan, a lawyer who has fought numerous pollution cases in the Madras High
Court and the National Green Tribunal calls this categorisation “delightfully
vague”. Without the clear basis of differentiation of damages, this Bill can only
be seen as a mere gesture for providing environmental remedies.
The Bill recognises or “caps” an upper limit of damages but does not establish a
lower or “floor” limit. The floor or what is the minimum damage we are willing
to bear is critical to determine what outcomes we would like to see from an
environment regulatory system. Without a tight definition, there will be a
tendency to list all violations, as ‘minor’ especially given the incremental nature
of most project related violations. Encroachments, destruction of mangroves,
river pollution and dust accumulation are all cases of violation that can progress
on an incremental basis and small fines such as the proposed “on the spot
penalty” of Rs. 1000-Rs 10000 are not adequate deterrents. These would be
“minor violations”. With the current definition giving huge discretionary
powers to an undefined authority and a unclear mechanism to identify minor
violation, there is a danger that all violations will be categorised as ‘minor’
thereby levying the lowest penalties for the harshest impacts of violations and
filtering them out of the adjudication system altogether.
The bill is all too quick to monetise environmental impacts caused by mining,
port and other industrial projects in the interests of creating a ‘Fund’. The
Technical Consultants may not be aware of the raging debates over
Compensatory Afforestation Management and Planning Authority that have
taken place since 2002. This Fund made up of monies collected from
proponents of development projects for forest use has become a large pot while
forest loss is still at shocking levels. While “polluter pays” is a crucial principle
in environment law, the amendment bill reduces it to a routine process, which
will neither help communities affected by industrial impacts nor act as a
deterrent and reduce instances of environmental violations and irreversible
damage to human health and the environment. Shibani Ghosh, advocate and
legal researcher, cautions that if fixed in advance, projects could even pass them
on to consumers.
The creation of this new mechanism draws no lessons from the limitations of
environment appellate mechanisms set up and which shut down in the last two
decades. The National Environment Appellate Authority before which
environmental approvals could be challenged functioned as an understaffed
body for all of its tenure and dealt with a handful of cases. The National
Tribunal Act of 1995, which had similar adjudication functions as those being
proposed, was never implemented after being enacted. Both these ceased to
exist in 2010.
Manju Menon and Kanchi Kohli are with the CPR-Namati Environment Justice
Programme. This article was also published in http://thewire.in/
Share this:
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
Click to print (Opens in new window)
Related
Nature on Wikipedia view
This is what has become of a ministry which is supposed to be the
environmental voice of the country
In "Environment"
Contents
1Composition
2Geological activity
3Water on Earth
o 3.1Oceans
o 3.2Rivers
Nature on Wikipedia view
o 3.3Lakes
3.3.1Ponds
o 3.4Human impact on water
4Atmosphere, climate and weather
o 4.1Layers of the atmosphere
4.1.1Principal layers
4.1.2Effects of global warming
o 4.2Climate
o 4.3Weather
5Life
6Ecosystems
7Biomes
8Biogeochemical cycles
9Wilderness
10Challenges
11Criticism
12See also
13References
14Further reading
15External links
Composition[edit]
Natural environment
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
For the biology term, see Biophysical environment. For other uses,
see Environment.
"Natural force" redirects here. For the album by Bonnie Tyler, see Natural
Force.
An image of the Sahara desert from satellite of the world's largest hot desert and
third-largest desert after the polar deserts
Th
ugh solid is in a state of rheic convection. This convection process causes the
lithospheric plates to move, albeit slowly. The resulting process is known
as plate tectonics. Volcanoes result primarily from the melting
of subducted crust material or of rising mantle at mid-ocean ridges and mantle
plumes.
Water on Earth[edit]
Atmospheric gases scatter blue light more than other wavelengths, creating a
blue halo when seen from space.
The retreat of glaciers since 1850 of Aletsch Glacier in the Swiss Alps (situation
in 1979, 1991 and 2002), due to global warming
Main article: Effects of global warming
The dangers of global warming are being increasingly studied by a wide global
consortium of scientists. These scientists are increasingly concerned about the
potential long-term effects of global warming on our natural environment and
on the planet. Of particular concern is how climate change and global warming
caused by anthropogenic, or human-made releases of greenhouse gases, most
notably carbon dioxide, can act interactively, and have adverse effects upon the
planet, its natural environment and humans' existence. It is clear the planet is
warming, and warming rapidly. This is due to the greenhouse effect, which is
caused by greenhouse gases, which trap heat inside the Earth's atmosphere
because of their more complex molecular structure which allows them to vibrate
and in turn trap heat and release it back towards the Earth.[14] This warming is
also responsible for the extinction of natural habitats, which in turn leads to a
reduction in wildlife population.The most recent report from the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (the group of the leading climate
scientists in the world) concluded that the earth will warm anywhere from 2.7 to
almost 11 degrees Fahrenheit (1.5 to 6 degrees Celsius) between 1990 and
Nature on Wikipedia view
2100.[15] Efforts have been increasingly focused on the mitigation of greenhouse
gases that are causing climatic changes, on developing adaptative strategies to
global warming, to assist humans, other animal, and plant species, ecosystems,
regions and nations in adjusting to the effects of global warming. Some
examples of recent collaboration to address climate change and global warming
include:
Another view of the Aletsch Glacier in the Swiss Alps, which because of global
warming has been decreasing
Life[edit]
Rainforests often have a great deal of biodiversity with many plant and animal
species. This is the Gambia River in Senegal's Niokolo-Koba National Park.
Main article: Ecosystem
An ecosystem (also called as environment) is a natural unit consisting of all
plants, animals and micro-organisms (biotic factors) in an area functioning
together with all of the non-living physical (abiotic) factors of the
environment.[29]
Central to the ecosystem concept is the idea that living organisms are
continually engaged in a highly interrelated set of relationships with every other
element constituting the environment in which they exist. Eugene Odum, one of
the founders of the science of ecology, stated: "Any unit that includes all of the
organisms (i.e.: the "community") in a given area interacting with the physical
environment so that a flow of energy leads to clearly defined trophic structure,
biotic diversity, and material cycles (i.e.: exchange of materials between living
and nonliving parts) within the system is an ecosystem."[30]
Old-growth forest and a creek on Larch Mountain, in the U.S. state of Oregon
The human ecosystem concept is then grounded in the deconstruction of the
human/nature dichotomy, and the emergent premise that all species are
ecologically integrated with each other, as well as with the abiotic constituents
of their biotope.
A greater number or variety of species or biological diversity of an ecosystem
may contribute to greater resilience of an ecosystem, because there are more
species present at a location to respond to change and thus "absorb" or reduce
its effects. This reduces the effect before the ecosystem's structure is
fundamentally changed to a different state. This is not universally the case and
Nature on Wikipedia view
there is no proven relationship between the species diversity of an ecosystem
and its ability to provide goods and services on a sustainable level.
The term ecosystem can also pertain to human-made environments, such
as human ecosystems and human-influenced ecosystems, and can describe any
situation where there is relationship between living organisms and their
environment. Fewer areas on the surface of the earth today exist free from
human contact, although some genuine wilderness areas continue to exist
without any forms of human intervention.
Biomes[edit]
Biogeochemical cycles[edit]
Wilderness[edit]
The Ahklun Mountains and the Togiak Wilderness within the Togiak National
Wildlife Refuge in the U.S. state of Alaska
Nature on Wikipedia view
Main article: Wilderness
Wilderness is generally defined as a natural environment on Earth that has not
been significantly modified by human activity. The WILD Foundation goes into
more detail, defining wilderness as: "The most intact, undisturbed wild natural
areas left on our planet - those last truly wild places that humans do not control
and have not developed with roads, pipelines or other industrial
infrastructure."[32] Wilderness areas and protected parks are considered
important for the survival of certain species, ecological studies, conservation,
solitude, and recreation. Wilderness is deeply valued for cultural,
spiritual, moral, and aesthetic reasons. Some nature writers believe wilderness
areas are vital for the human spirit and creativity.[33]
The word, "wilderness", derives from the notion of wildness; in other words that
which is not controllable by humans. The word's etymology is from the Old
English wildeornes, which in turn derives from wildeor meaning wild
beast (wild + deor = beast, deer).[34] From this point of view, it is the wildness
of a place that makes it a wilderness. The mere presence or activity of people
does not disqualify an area from being "wilderness." Many ecosystems that are,
or have been, inhabited or influenced by activities of people may still be
considered "wild." This way of looking at wilderness includes areas within
which natural processes operate without very noticeable human interference.
Wildlife includes all non-domesticated plants, animals and other organisms.
Domesticating wild plant and animal species for human benefit has occurred
many times all over the planet, and has a major impact on the environment, both
positive and negative. Wildlife can be found in all ecosystems. Deserts, rain
forests, plains, and other areas—including the most developed urban sites—all
have distinct forms of wildlife. While the term in popular culture usually refers
to animals that are untouched by civilized human factors, most scientists agree
that wildlife around the world is (now) impacted by human activities.
Challenges[edit]
Nature on Wikipedia view
Criticism[edit]
In some cultures the term environment is meaningless because there is no
separation between people and what they view as the natural world, or their
surroundings.[41] Specifically in the United States, many native cultures do not
recognize the "environment", or see themselves as environmentalists.[42]
See also[edit]
Conservation movement
Gaia hypothesis
Index of environmental articles
List of environmental issues
List of environmental websites
Natural capital
Natural history
Natural landscape
Sustainability
Sustainable agriculture
Timeline of environmental history
References[edit]