NAEEM ZAHOOR

FA18-MBAP-0052
Business & corporate Law Assignment
(CASE 1)
 I’m given the charge of arranging the wedding program and I will meet a
caterer/beautician, first of all the details will be told by me, How many people will be
attending the program and what are the requirements, Then the caterer will tell about
the total expenses and if He’ll be able to fulfil all the requirements.
If I’ll be agree with his expenses and satisfy with his facilities I’ll ask him to do the all
arrangements.
Yes, A contract is formed between me and the caterer.
We can write down all the dealings on a legal document so that if either of the party
doesn’t fulfil the requirements or breach the contract the other party can sue him.
Yes there is an offer made and accepted by the caterer.
The dealing created a legal relationship between me and the caterer.
Yes I have reached the age of maturity, have sound mind and not disqualified by the law
so I can make a contract with the caterer.
There’s a legal object, possibility of performance, free consent of both the parties and
contract is not made by threatening each other.
The contract is written contract.

(case 2)

 If the store management has set the blouses and jumpers in combined and individual
then why did she did take a blouse from a combined hanger and took a jumper from
individual hanger when the jumper and hangers were already set and she knew the
prices of both.
She breached the rules of the store and should pay the whole price and the store owner
can sue Mrs Dawood that why did she do like this.
If the things are put on sale combined and individually then why did she did she need to
do like this, Even if she doesn’t do this intentionally or may be she didn’t know the
selling rules of the store.
If she has done all this intentionally she would surely pay penalty for doing this act but if
she doesn’t know the rules then she will be declared innocent.
 (CASE 3)

 Yes Mr and Mrs Haris khan can avoid the contract because they have not signed on the
amended mortgage contract.
Muzammal & co can’t sue Mr and Mrs Haris khan because they don’t have any link with
the contract.
Muzammal & co can sue the person with whom first mortgage contract was made
because He would be the party with whom contract was made and Muzammal & co
would have agreed to make an ammendent contract with him.
In this case Mr and Mrs Haris khan are innocent and Muzammal & co can’t sue them or
can took any action against their property.

(CASE 4)

 In this case if the agreement made between the defendant and plaintiff has a certain
duration of time mentioned in the agreement then the defendant is not at fault because
the time limit of payment is not yet ended so the plaintiff can’t sue him.
But if the defendant agreed to pay the fees immediately and after handing over the
financial statements he refuse to pay then plaintiff has the right to sue him.
In this case major thing is the time duration of payment, if plaintiff is going to sue the
defendant before the end of time duration then defendant will not be at fault and He’ll
not be liable to pay, But if he agreed to pay immediately and then refused thenplaintiff
will sue and the defendant will be liable to pay.

(CASE 5)

 In this case it is mentioned that Mr and Mrs Bukhari were threatened by the Mr javed
that he will kill his brother jawwad and took their signs on the transfer of property
contract,so any contract where there is no free consent of the parties is not called valid.
For a valid contract it is must that both parties of the contract should have free consent
to be part of that contract,without free consent contract is not valid.Any contract made
by threatening someone is not legal as well as not valid.
Mr and Mrs Bukhari can sue Mr javed in court that He threatened them to sign on the
property transfer contract and surely court will take action against Mr javed according
to the law.
 In this case Mr and Mrs Bukhari are innocent even they were agreed to do anything for
preventing Mr jawwad but still this contract is not valid because any contract made by
threats is not valid.

(CASE 6)

 In this case There is no fault of lesee (shariq Studios).Mr shariq received the document
but He made alteration in it and returned it back to the Lessor plaintiff but if the plaintiff
lessor (Faisal inc) didn’t read it or recognized the changes in it there is no fault of shariq
studio.
If someone who is running a company why will he sign the document without reading it.
If he sue Mr shariq the court will say you could talk to Mr shariq and confirm about the
rent and everything.But if you didn’t talk and confirm everything it’s not the fault of Mr
shaariq so Mr shariq will not be liable to pay double rent or anything what (faisal inc)
asks him.
The court will say it’s your fault that why you didn’t read the documents and signed it
without reading it.Now no compensation will be made by Mr shaariq.