Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
FLUID FLOW
CONTENT
LIST OF TABLES
APPENDIX
Figure V-A4.1 - AFTP chart - gas lines typical for a 20" diameter tube
1. APPLICABILITY
The purpose of this paragraph is to provide guidelines for the sizing of process and utility lines within
the battery limit of a plant.
• For a feasibility study a quick estimate of the size of some main lines may be required.
• For a pre-project study a better estimate of the line size will be required.
• For both the feasibility and pre-project studies the AFTP ("Abaques de Lefevre") charts
can be used :
- "Pour le calcul des pertes de charges des liquides dans les conduites"
- "Pour le calcul des pertes de charges des gaz dans les conduites" (see typical
example of the AFTP chart for a 20" gas line on Figure V-A4.1).
Flare lines are excluded from this chapter. For the design of flare lines, refer to PRODEM Section
XXXII SAFETY EQUIPMENT - Chapter C Flares.
Notes :
• The AFTP charts are applicable for commercial seamless steel tubes, corresponding to
0.046 mm absolute roughness wall surface
• Multiplying correction factors must be applied to the pressure drops and velocities indicated
on the AFTP charts when used for internal diameters different from the referenced ones :
• For nominal diameter standards and wall thickness determination, refer to Chapter V-A1.
The ρV²and ρV3 criteria as stated for vapor lines can be followed in two-phase line, using the fluid
apparent density ρm expressed as :
W
ρ = ρm = in kg/m3
Wl Wv
+
ρl ρv
W
Vm = m s
D²
ρm π 3600
4
In addition, the flow regime may have to be checked ; using flow pattern can be considered for small
diameter lines and low operating pressures (ex : reboiler lines).
For high pressure large diameter lines (ex : production headers) one shall preferably use computer
programs :
• For horizontal lines slug and plug flow regimes should be avoided.
• For vertical lines slug flow regimes should be avoided.
5.1. Corrosion
For corrosion resistant material (Duplex, SS321, Special alloys), no limitation of flowing velocity up
to 100 m/s and no requirement for corrosion allowance.
For Carbon Steel, piping in corrosive fluid service, corrosion inhibitor injection is required. The
flowing velocity is limited by the inhibitor film integrity (Based on experimental results collected on
test loop, shear stress to be maintained below 45 N/m²) ; the corrosion allowance, calculated by
DPS/TEC (program LIPUCOR) for a design service life, is added to the calculated pipewall
thickness.
5.2. Erosion
For Duplex, Stainless Steel or alloy material, the flowing velocity must be limited to :
• 100 m/s in single phase vapour lines and multiphase lines in stratified flow regimes (65 m/s
for 13% Cr material),
• 20 m/s in single phase liquid lines and multiphase lines in annular, bubble or hydrodynamic
slug flow regime,
• 70 m/s in multiphase lines in mist flow regimes.
Ve = C / ρ
m
The above velocity limitations only apply in absence of abrasive (solid) particles such as
sand.
"Where solid and/or corrosive contaminants are present or when "C" values higher than 100 for
continuous service are used, periodic surveys to access pipe wall thickness should be considered"
(API RP 14E - Edition 1991).
Table V-A4.1
Pumps suction :
. Liquid at bubble point or
with dissolved gas 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5
. Non boiling liquid 2.3 3.5 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8
Unit lines :
. Liquid at bubble point or
with dissolved gas 0.6 1.0 0.6 1.0 1.4 1.8
. Non boiling liquid 2.3 3.5 0.9 1.2 1.8 2.4
Pump discharge :
. Discharge pressure ≤ 50 barg 3.5 4.5 Velocity 1.5 to 4.5 m/s 6.0
. Discharge pressure > 50 barg 7.0 9.0 Velocity 1.5 to 4.5 m/s 6.0
(1)
Column outlet 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.9 0.9 0.9
Notes (1) : 3.0 m/s maxi (2 m/s average) at storage tank inlet or in loading
(2) : Vendor requirements could supersede maximum velocity values, upon Company agreement
Table V-A4.2
VAPOR LINES
- Continuous operation :
. P ≤ 20 bar g 6 000 ) ∆ P must be considered and be
. 20 < P ≤ 50 bar g 7 500 )
. 50 < P ≤ 80 bar g 10 000 (1) ) compatible with the
. 80 < P ≤ 120 bar g 15 000 )
. P > 120 bar g 20 000 ) corresponding service
)
- Discontinuous operations e.g.: compressor )
anti-surge : . P ≤ 50 bar g 10 000 (1) )
. 50 < P ≤ 80 bar g 15 000 )
. P > 80 bar g 25 000 )
STEAM LINES
Notes (1) : Value for design. Could be increased but not exceeding 15 000, in case of debottlenecking.
(2) : Noise limit : ρV3 = 100 000 to 200 000 kg/s 3 max, or velocity limit as per API RP 14 E : V ≤ 60 ft/s.
6.1.1. AFTP charts could be used to determine the friction pressure drop
with the correction of the line diameter such as indicated on these
charts.
D ρ Vm
Re =
µ
ε
Step 2 : Determine the relative roughness : See Figure V-A1.1 à =
D
V²
Step 4 : ∆P = f D ρ (bar / 100m)
2D
Different methods exist to calculate the pressure drop for two phase flow. Those based on empirical
correlations have limited range of applicability depending on vertical or horizontal line, gas and liquid
superficial velocities, pressure and temperature conditions. The mechanistic models are more
deterministic, with a wider applicability, they should preferably be used for accurate calculation.
Quick methods for rough estimation are as follows :
6.2.1. "AFTP" Chart for gas could be used with the correction of the line
diameter ; taking the liquid viscosity as the fluid viscosity.
Add equivalent lengths or Resistance Coefficients to account for pressure drop in valves and
fittings, as explained in paragraph V-A2.3.
For two phase fluid the Resistance Coefficients can be used with ρ = ρm and V = Vm as defined in
paragraph 4 of this Chapter.
This correction will most of the time be necessary for plant line sizing valves bends and fittings
participate to the overall pressure drop, not negligibly compared to friction pressure drop along
straight piping sections.
The overall pressure differential between two locations of a piping system must account for the
change in elevation, or hydrostatic head.
This term is of major importance for liquid lines and two phase lines.
In two phase flow lines, the hydrostatic head depends on the liquid hold-up, i.e. the distribution of the
vapour and liquid phases in the line cross section.
As for pressure drop, different methods exist to determine the liquid hold-up. The mechanistic
models will be used preferably to the empirical correlations, for accurate calculations.
Refer to Chapter V-A3 on TWO-PHASE FLOW.
7. PIPING CLASS
The purpose of this paragraph is to determine the piping class used as shown on PID line when the
piping material class document does not exist. This is generally the case for feasibility and pre-
project studies.
The class number consists of a capital letter representing the ANSI series and a two-digit number
representing the main material entering into the composition of the material used for the valves
bodies, tubes, fittings and flanges of the material class question.
Example :
B 01
. .
. .
. .
150 Lbs Rating.............. .................Carbon steel material
The tables below give the letters and numbers to be used for numbering piping classes.
Rating (Lbs) 125 150 250 300 400 600 900 1500 2500 Tracing
Letter A (1) B C (1) D E (1) F G H J Y
The calculation of pipe wall thickness are in accordance with the ANSI B31.3 design code (refer to
Chapter V-A.1, paragraph 4.3.3), and shall include a corrosion allowance as well as mill tolerances
as applicable. The weld efficiency coefficient of welded pipes shall be equal to 1 (i.e. full
radiography).
An example of a typical Piping Material Class (D03), from SP-TCS-112 is given in Table V-A4.3.
These classes are regularly updated. The process engineer shall check that he/she uses the latest
issue, applicable to the specific project he/she is working for.
All carbon steel and low alloy steel materials shall incorporate a minimum corrosion allowance of
1.27 mm. Stainless steels, copper nickels, galvanised carbon steels, glass reinforced materials, and
other corrosion resistant material shall be used without extra-thickness for corrosion allowance.
Additionally, schedules "5 S" shall not be used for stainless steels, and schedule 80 shall be
selected as a minimum for pipes 1 1/2" in diameter and below for offshore applications.
If the wall thickness required to contain the pressure is less than the "Minimum Corroded
Thickness", the "Minimum Corroded Thickness" shall be used for pipe wall thickness selection
purpose.