Sie sind auf Seite 1von 6

Chemosphere 90 (2013) 2035–2040

Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect

Chemosphere
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/chemosphere

Solubilities of selected organic electronic materials in pressurized hot water


and estimations of aqueous solubilities at 298.15 K
Pavel Karásek, Barbora Hohnová, Josef Planeta, Lenka Št’avíková, Michal Roth ⇑
Institute of Analytical Chemistry of the ASCR, v. v. i., Veveří 97, 60200 Brno, Czech Republic

h i g h l i g h t s

" Aqueous solubilities of hole transport materials were measured at high temperature.
" Room-temperature solubility estimates were extrapolated from high temperature data.
" Room-temperature aqueous solubilities appear to be extremely low.

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: Increasing production and disposal of organic light-emitting diode (OLED) displays for smartphones and
Received 11 July 2012 tablets may have impact on the environment depending on the aqueous solubility of the pertinent chem-
Received in revised form 4 October 2012 icals. Here, aqueous solubilities are presented for several compounds, mostly aromatic amines, used as
Accepted 17 October 2012
hole transport materials in the OLED displays. Solute selection includes 1,4-bis(diphenylamino)benzene,
Available online 21 November 2012
tetra-N-phenylbenzidine, 4,40 -bis(N-carbazolyl)-1,10 -biphenyl, 1,3,5-tris(diphenylamino)benzene, and
9,10-bis(phenylethynyl)anthracene. The solubilities are those in pressurized hot water (PHW), i.e., mea-
Keywords:
sured at elevated temperature (up to 260 °C) and pressure. The semi-quantitative estimates of room-tem-
Aqueous solubility
OLED display
perature solubilities of the solutes have been obtained from extrapolations of the solubilities in PHW. For
Hole transport material the compounds studied, the estimated aqueous solubilities at room temperature do not exceed
Aromatic amine 2  1011 g of the solute per 1 kg of water. Aqueous solubilities of triphenylamine have also been mea-
Pressurized hot water sured and used to upgrade a recent group-contribution model of aqueous solubilities of organic nonelec-
trolytes with the parameters for the nitrogen atom in aromatic amines.
Ó 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction are reported for several of these materials including 1,4-bis


(diphenylamino)benzene, tetra-N-phenylbenzidine, 4,40 -bis(N-
Steady growth in production of communication devices includ- carbazolyl)-1,10 -biphenyl, and 1,3,5-tris(diphenylamino)benzene.
ing smartphones and tablets has been accompanied by rising In addition, aqueous solubilities of the parent compound, triphen-
demand for organic light-emitting diode (OLED) displays. Naturally, ylamine, are also reported here as well as the solubilities of 9,
the growing production of the OLED displays leads to increasing 10-bis(phenylethynyl)anthracene used as a charge transport and
rate of their disposal. The chemicals used in the OLED displays photosensitizing material (Gill, 1983). Structures of these solutes
may have impact on the environment depending on their respec- are shown in Fig. 1.
tive aqueous solubilities. Therefore, aqueous solubility data of the In the literature, there are no quantitative data on the aqueous
individual compounds involved are of increasing interest and solubilities of either the hole transport materials mentioned above
significance. or 9,10-bis(phenylethynyl)anthracene. All these compounds are
The development of OLED displays has involved a large number organic solids with high melting points, and a suitable technique
of diverse compounds (Shinar and Savvateev, 2004; Shirota, 2006). to measure their aqueous solubilities has been the ‘‘generator col-
An important class of chemicals employed in OLED production are umn’’ method based on slow passage of the solvent through a bed
aromatic amines used as hole transport materials (Strohriegl and packed with the solid solute to generate saturated aqueous solution
Grazulevicius, 2002). In the present work, aqueous solubilities (May et al., 1978). This procedure has now been a well-established
method to measure the solubilities of solids in liquid solvents
(Fonseca et al., 2011). At or near the room temperature
⇑ Corresponding author. Tel.: +420 532290171; fax: +420 541212113. (298.15 K), the aqueous solubilities of the present solutes are gen-
E-mail address: roth@iach.cz (M. Roth). erally small and prohibitively difficult to measure directly. To

0045-6535/$ - see front matter Ó 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.10.085
2036 P. Karásek et al. / Chemosphere 90 (2013) 2035–2040

N N N N

1,4-bis(diphenylamino)benzene tetra-N-phenylbenzidine

N N
N N

4,4'-bis(N-carbazolyl)-1,1'-biphenyl 1,3,5-tris(diphenylamino)benzene

triphenylamine 9,10-bis(phenylethynyl)anthracene

Fig. 1. Solute structures.

obtain readily measurable solubilities, therefore, the operating (Prague, Czech Republic), toluene (HPLC grade, 99.8%) was ob-
temperature of the measurements had to be raised, and the exper- tained from Penta (Chrudim, Czech Republic), and methanol (HPLC
imental solubility data reported below are those in pressurized hot grade, 99.9%) was purchased from Lach-Ner (Neratovice, Czech
water (PHW). The generator column method has frequently been Republic). Water was purified with a reverse osmosis system Ultra
used to measure the solubilities of organic nonelectrolyte solids Clear UV (SG Wasseraufbereitung und Regenerierstation GmbH,
in PHW (Miller and Hawthorne, 1998; Miller et al., 1998; Anders- Barsbüttel, Germany). Glass beads (diameter 0.57–0.70 mm) mixed
son et al., 2005; Srinivas et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2010), and we with the solid solute before packing the extraction cell of the appa-
have previously applied an optimized version of this method in ratus were purchased from GlassDekorService (Valašské Meziříčí,
combination with gas chromatography (GC) to determine the Czech Republic).
aqueous solubilities of several classes of aromatic and other com-
pounds (Karásek et al., 2006a, 2007, 2008). In the present work, be- 2.2. Apparatus to generate aqueous solutions
cause of rather low volatility of the compounds studied,
quantification has been carried out using high performance liquid The in-house constructed apparatus to generate hot aqueous
chromatography (HPLC) rather than GC. solutions has been described (Karásek et al., 2006a) and employed
(Karásek et al., 2007, 2008) earlier and it has been used in the pres-
ent study without any modification except for routine mainte-
2. Experimental section nance. The essential features of the apparatus include a vertically
mounted, 1.4-mL volume, stainless-steel extraction cell housed in
2.1. Materials a thermostating cover, and the use of proper length (approximately
1.3 m) of fused-silica capillary (75 lm i.d.) as the flow restriction
Triphenylamine (98%) and 9,10-bis(phenylethynyl)anthracene device at the outlet of the extraction cell.
(99%) were purchased from Alfa Aesar (Karlsruhe, Germany). 1,4-
Bis(diphenylamino)benzene (97%), tetra-N-phenylbenzidine 2.3. Procedure to generate aqueous solutions
(97%), 4,40 -bis(N-carbazolyl)-1,10 -biphenyl (97%), 1,3,5-tris(diphen-
ylamino)benzene (97%), and tris(4-carbazoyl-9-ylphenyl)amine Following the method employed previously, the crystalline sol-
(97%) were obtained from Sigma–Aldrich (Prague, Czech Republic). ute was thoroughly mixed with glass beads (diameter 0.57–
Prior to use, the solutes were recrystallized from toluene. Acetoni- 0.70 mm) and charged into the extraction cell. After mounting
trile (HPLC grade, 99.9%) was purchased from Riedel deHaën the cell in the apparatus, the system was flushed with nitrogen
P. Karásek et al. / Chemosphere 90 (2013) 2035–2040 2037

to remove air and then slowly filled with water, and subsequently 3. Results and discussion
the desired operating temperature and pressure were allowed to
establish. The water pump was operated in constant flow mode 3.1. Solubilities in PHW
so that the operating pressure resulted from the interplay between
the flow rate set by the pump and the hydraulic resistance of the To our knowledge, no data have yet been available on the aque-
flow restrictor at the system outlet. The length of the 75 lm i.d. ous solubilities of the solutes studied here.
fused silica tubing employed as the restrictor was always selected Numerical results of the solubility measurements are compiled
so that the mass flow rate of water through the system was less in the electronic Supplementary Information file. As different ways
than 0.015 g s1 to ensure proper equilibration between the solid to express concentrations have been preferred in different disci-
solute and the aqueous phase. This value was based on preliminary plines, the results are presented in several forms – equilibrium
test of the flow-rate dependence of the resultant solubility that mole fraction of the solute, equilibrium mass fraction of the solute,
was carried out with 1,4-bis(diphenylamino)benzene at 433.2 K. solute molality, and equilibrium mass of the solute per 1 kg of
Because of rather low aqueous solubilities of the present solutes water. Fig. 2 shows graphical presentation of the experimental re-
and also because of difficult calibration at elevated temperature and sults with previous data for anthracene (Karásek et al., 2006a)
pressure we did not attempt a direct analysis of the hot aqueous shown for reference. The temperature dependence of the individ-
solutions, opting for an indirect procedure instead. Although time ual solute data sets has been described with the least-squares fits
consuming, the indirect procedure makes it possible to accumulate via the modified Apelblat equation (Apelblat and Manzurola,
sufficient amount of the aqueous solution to allow a reliable quan- 1999),
tification of the solute Therefore, after the selected operating tem-
perature and pressure have stabilized, five samples of the ln x ¼ a þ bðT 0 =TÞ þ c lnðT=T 0 Þ ð1Þ
aqueous effluent were collected into pre-weighed separate vials
each of which contained a known amount of cold water to prevent where x is the mole fraction solubility of the solute, T0 = 298.15 K
evaporation of the hot effluent from the outlet restrictor. After cool- and the values of the coefficients a, b and c together with their stan-
ing down to room temperature, each vial was weighed so that the dard errors as obtained by multilinear regression are given in Table 1.
mass of aqueous effluent could be obtained from the difference. Because of its three adjustable parameters, Eq. (1) is relatively flex-
ible in fitting the experimental data on solubilities of solids in liquids
2.4. Processing of aqueous solutions and has frequently been used for the purpose (Wang and Wang,
2004; Karásek et al., 2006a; Razmara et al., 2010; Srinivas et al.,
Depending on the extraction temperature and the expected sol- 2010; Zhang et al., 2010). Note that Eq. (1) describes the temperature
ubility of the solute, a known amount (1–30 mL) of toluene was course of natural logarithm of the solute solubility whereas Fig. 2
added to each vial, and the solute was allowed to transfer to tolu- shows decadic logarithms of the solubility. Overall, at a particular
ene during 3 weeks with agitation of the vials in regular time inter- temperature, the solute solubility decreases with rising molar mass
vals. Afterwards, a 1000-lL portion of the toluene layer was of the solute (see the Supplementary Information). However, in the
withdrawn and centrifuged for 90 s at 15 000 rpm to separate heaviest solutes of this study, 1,3,5-tris(diphenylamino)benzene,
any residues of the aqueous layer. Subsequently, a 500-lL portion tetra-N-phenylbenzidine and 4,40 -bis(N-carbazolyl)-1,10 -biphenyl,
of the toluene layer was allowed to evaporate, and the solute was the effect of molar mass tends to become blurred because of differ-
transferred to acetonitrile containing a pre-estimated amount of ent rates of the change in solubility with temperature. The mean val-
the internal standard. The acetonitrile solution was then injected ues of the relative change in solubility with temperature, (@ln x/@T)r,
for analysis by HPLC. across the measurement temperature ranges for the individual sol-
utes are 0.0744 K1, 0.115 K1, 0.126 K1, 0.0971 K1, 0.142 K1
2.5. HPLC apparatus and procedure and 0.113 K1, for triphenylamine, 1,4-bis(diphenylamino)benzene,
tetra-N-phenylbenzidine, 4,40 -bis(N-carbazolyl)-1,10 -biphenyl, 1,3,
The apparatus was an Agilent 1200 Series HPLC (Agilent, Wald-
bronn, Germany) equipped with a diode array UV–VIS detector,
quaternary pump with solvent degasser, and a Kinetex column
(length 100 mm, i.d. 3 mm) packed with 2.6 lm core–shell parti-
cles of pentafluorophenyl-bonded silica (Phenomenex, Torrance
(CA), USA). The injection volume was 10 lL. The mobile phase
was composed of acetonitrile (solvent A) and water containing
5% (v/v) of methanol (solvent B). The same gradient program was
employed for all solutes: the start with the 50:50 (v/v) A:B mixture
was followed by a 5-min. linear gradient to 90:10 (v/v) A:B mix-
ture, the 90:10 composition was kept for 6 min. and followed by
a 2-min. period at the starting 50:50 composition prior to the next
injection.
Tris(4-carbazoyl-9-ylphenyl)amine was used as the internal
standard in the determination of all solutes except triphenylamine
where 1,4-bis(diphenylamino)benzene served as the internal
standard.
The operating wavelengths for UV detection were 295 nm for
triphenylamine and 1,4-bis(diphenylamino)benzene, 350 nm for
tetra-N-phenylbenzidine, 235 nm for 4,40 -bis(N-carbazolyl)-1, Fig. 2. Temperature dependence of solute solubilities (decadic logarithms of
10 -biphenyl, 300 nm for 1,3,5-tris(diphenylamino)benzene and equilibrium mole fractions). (s) anthracene (Karásek et al., 2006a); (d) triphen-
ylamine; (h) 1,4-bis(diphenylamino)benzene; (+) tetra-N-phenylbenzidine; ()
270 nm for 9,10-bis(phenylethynyl)anthracene. The wavelength 4,40 -bis(N-carbazolyl)-1,10 -biphenyl; () 1,3,5-tris(diphenylamino)benzene; (r)
used for the tris(4-carbazoyl-9-ylphenyl)amine internal standard 9,10-bis(phenylethynyl)anthracene. Data of anthracene are shown for reference.
was 235 nm. The lines serve just to guide the eye.
2038 P. Karásek et al. / Chemosphere 90 (2013) 2035–2040

Table 1
Least-squares estimates of the coefficients a, b, and c of Eq. (1) and the standard errors (SE) of the estimates, with Tmin and Tmax indicating the minimum and the maximum
temperatures of the solute solubility measurements, respectively.

Solute Triphenylamine 1,4-bis(diphenylamino) Tetra-N- 4,40 -bis(N-carbazolyl)- 1,3,5-tris(diphenylamino) 9,10-bis(phenylethynyl)


benzene phenylbenzidine 1,10 -biphenyl benzene anthracene
Tmax (K) 313.2 403.2 433.2 433.2 453.2 433.2
Tmin (K) 393.2 463.2 493.2 533.2 513.2 513.2
a 40.229 351.15 199.72 96.965 186.59 95.839
SE of a 10.778 100.41 74.24 24.98 21.53 60.10
b 19.067 331.18 166.53 61.376 259.53 58.076
SE of b 10.881 106.04 79.94 27.19 23.49 65.04
c 42.395 278.41 165.67 84.880 91.754 90.204
SE of c 9.259 73.22 51.62 16.90 14.53 41.22

Table 2
Least-squares estimates of the coefficients e and f of Eq. (2) and the standard errors (SE) of the estimates.

Solute Triphenylamine 1,4 bis(diphenylamino) Tetra-N 4,40 -bis(N carbazolyl)- 1,3,5 tris(diphenylamino) 9,10 bis(phenylethynyl)
benzene phenylbenzidine 1,10 -biphenyl benzene anthracene
e 43.259 68.957 77.792 65.059 86.959 71.206
SE of e 0.3080 2.070 1.054 0.4818 3.019 0.8309
f 0.074411 0.11531 0.12585 0.097113 0.14252 0.11326
SE of f 0.0008699 0.004774 0.002258 0.0009947 0.006242 0.001729

Table 3
Estimates of solute solubilities at 298.15 K.

Solute Solubility
Mole fraction, x Mass fraction, w Molality, m (mol kg1) Mass of solute (g) per 1 kg of water
10 8
Triphenylamine 7  10 1  10 4  108 1  105
1,4-Bis(diphenylamino)benzene 1  1015 2  1014 5  1014 2  1011
Tetra-N-phenylbenzidine 3  1018 9  1017 2  1016 9  1014
4,40 -Bis(N-carbazolyl)-1,10 -biphenyl 2  1016 6  1015 1  1014 6  1012
1,3,5-Tris(diphenylamino)benzene 5  1020 2  1018 3  1018 2  1015
9,10-Bis(phenylethynyl)anthracene 6  1017 1  1015 3  1015 1  1012

5-tris(diphenylamino)benzene and 9,10-bis(phenylethynyl)anthra- The parameters e and f are listed in Table 2 and the estimated
cene, respectively. The temperature slope of solubility in 4,40 - solubilities at 298.15 K are compiled in Table 3. The effect of pres-
bis(N-carbazolyl)-1,10 -biphenyl is considerably lower than in the sure in the estimated solubilities at 298.15 K has been neglected as
other heavy solutes, possibly because of different electronic struc- it is much smaller than the uncertainty of extrapolation over the
ture resulting from the presence of carbazolyl-type nitrogen atoms large interval between 298.15 K and the lower limit of the temper-
and absence of amine-type nitrogens (see Fig. 1). ature range of the experimental data. Overall, the estimated aque-
ous solubilities of the hole transport materials at 298.15 K are
3.2. Estimation of solute aqueous solubilities at 298.15 K extremely small so that, most probably, they do not constitute
any immediate environmental concern.
In the present study, the solute solubilities have been measured
at elevated temperatures. As there are no data on the solute solu- 3.3. Triphenylamine activity coefficient estimation
bilities at 298.15 K, it might be useful to provide gross estimates by
extrapolating the present high-temperature data although, be- The solubility of a solid solute in a liquid solvent can be used to
cause of the large temperature interval to be spanned, such an estimate the solute activity coefficient from Eq. (3) (Prausnitz et al.,
extrapolation is rather daring and the estimates certainly suffer 1999; Karásek et al., 2006b),
from very large uncertainty. Therefore, the estimated values
   
should rather be understood as qualified estimations of the upper DHfus Tt DC P T t Tt Vs  Vl
ln csat ¼ 1 þ  1  ln þ P  ln x
limit of the aqueous solubility of the particular solute at 298.15 K. RT t T R T T RT
Although Eq. (1) has been very useful for interpolating the experi- ð3Þ
mental data, the standard errors in the coefficients determined by
multilinear regression (see Table 1) are rather high. Consequently, where csat is the Raoult law activity coefficient of the solute in the
the use of Eq. (1) with the parameters from Table 1 to extrapolate saturated solution, R is the molar gas constant, T is the solution tem-
the experimental data over large temperature intervals would not perature, Tt is the triple-point temperature of the solute, DHfus is the
be reliable. To obtain more robust estimates of low-temperature molar enthalpy of fusion of the solute at Tt, DCP is the difference be-
solubilities, therefore, the extrapolations have not been based on tween the molar isobaric heat capacities of the pure subcooled li-
Eq. (1) but on simple linear fits of the experimental data with Eq. quid solute and the pure solid solute, Vs and Vl are the molar
(2), volumes of the pure solid solute and the pure subcooled liquid
solute, respectively, and P is the pressure. Eq. (3) applies if there
ln x ¼ e þ fT ð2Þ
are no solid–solid phase transitions in the pure solute within the
P. Karásek et al. / Chemosphere 90 (2013) 2035–2040 2039

where, again, T0 = 298.15 K. The model has been developed from an


essentially isobaric set of csat values, and therefore, the effect of
pressure has not been treated explicitly. Employing the previous
group contributions for aromatic carbon atoms (Karásek et al.,
2010), the csat data for triphenylamine obtained in the present work
have been used to derive the Ci parameters for the nitrogen atom in
tertiary aromatic amines; the least-squares regression yields

CNðtaromÞ ¼ 54:738  57:365ðT 0 =TÞ  42:585 lnðT=T 0 Þ ð6Þ

where the temperature range is that of the source experimental


data, 313 K < T < 393 K. Fig. 3 shows the temperature dependence
of the Ci contributions for all the groups available to date. It should
be noted that the N(t-amine) group shows the steepest rate dCi/dT
(hydrophilicity loss with rising temperature) among all the groups
shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. Temperature dependence of group contributions Ci. (s) CH(aromatic); (d) 4. Conclusion
C(aromatic); (j) CH2(ring); (h) N(pyridine); (4) S(ring); (+) O(ring); (r) NH(pyr-
role); (.) C@O(ring); () CH(alicyclic); (}) N(tert-amine). Solubilities in PHW have been measured of several compounds
used as hole transport materials or dopants in electro-optical de-
vices. The solutes and their respective temperature ranges of the
temperature interval from T to Tt. The last-but-one term on the
solubility measurements included 1,4-bis(diphenylamino)benzene
right-hand side of Eq. (3) accounts for the effect of elevated pressure
(403–463 K), tetra-N-phenylbenzidine (433–493 K), 4,40 -bis(N-carbaz-
assuming that both the solid solute and the subcooled liquid solute
olyl)-1,10 -biphenyl (433–533 K), 1,3,5-tris(diphenylamino)benzene
are incompressible and that their respective vapor pressures are
(453–513 K) and 9,10-bis(phenylethynyl)anthracene (433–513 K).
negligible with respect to the total pressure P. Among the present
The pressure of the solubility measurements ranged from 5.0 to
solutes, experimental values of DHfus and Tt are only available for
7.5 MPa. The results suggest that aqueous solubilities of these
triphenylamine, and experimental values of DCP are not available
compounds at 298.15 K are very low, generally below 2  1011 g
for any solute of this study. Therefore, the conversion of solubilities
of the solute per 1 kg of water.
to activity coefficients was performed only for triphenylamine, and,
In addition to the data for hole transport materials, the aqueous
following a previous recommendation for polycyclic aromatic
solubility of triphenylamine has been measured within 313 to
hydrocarbons (Pappa et al., 2005), the approximation DCP = 0 -
393 K. The solubility data were converted to the activity coeffi-
J mol1 K1 was adopted. The triple point temperature of triphenyl-
cients of triphenylamine in the aqueous solution, and these were
amine was approximated by the melting point temperature of
used to upgrade an earlier group-contribution model of activity
399.9 K as given in the NIST Chemistry WebBook (Linstrom and
coefficients in saturated aqueous solutions with the parameters
Mallard, 2011) with the primary source from Chickos et al.
for the nitrogen atom in tertiary aromatic amines.
(1991). The enthalpy of fusion of triphenylamine (24.89 kJ mol1)
was taken from the NIST Chemistry WebBook (Linstrom and Mal-
Acknowledgments
lard, 2011) with the primary source from Acree (1991). The molar
volume of the subcooled liquid triphenylamine was evaluated from
We acknowledge with thanks the funding of this work by the
the modified Rackett equation (Spencer and Adler, 1978) using the
Czech Science Foundation (Projects P206/11/0138, P503/11/P523
critical properties estimated from the Joback correlation (Joback
and P106/12/0522) and by the Academy of Sciences of the Czech
and Reid, 1987; Poling et al., 2001), and the molar volume of the so-
Republic (Institutional Support RVO:68081715).
lid triphenylamine was obtained using the correlation of Goodman
et al. (2004).
The resultant values of the activity coefficients are included in Appendix A. Supplementary material
the electronic Supplementary Information file. Activity coefficients
of organic solutes have often been described with diverse kinds of Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
group contribution models that build the activity coefficient value the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.
from additive contributions of the individual groups in the solute 2012.10.085.
molecule (Fredenslund et al., 1975, 1977; Fornari et al., 2008;
Gmehling, 2009). Employing the solubility data in PHW as gener- References
ated in our laboratory, we have recently constructed a very simple
model designed specifically to describe and/or predict the activity Acree Jr., W.E., 1991. Thermodynamic properties of organic compounds: enthalpy of
fusion and melting point temperature compilation. Thermochim. Acta 189, 37–
coefficients of organic nonelectrolytes in saturated aqueous solu- 56.
tions across a wide range of temperature, with the final goal being Andersson, T.A., Hartonen, K.M., Riekkola, M.-L., 2005. Solubility of acenaphthene,
the prediction of solute solubilities in PHW (Karásek et al., 2010). anthracene, and pyrene in water at 50 °C to 300 °C. J. Chem. Eng. Data 50, 1177–
1183.
The starting equation of the model is Apelblat, A., Manzurola, E., 1999. Solubilities of o-acetylsalicylic, 4-aminosalicylic,
X 3,5-dinitrosalicyclic, and p-toluic acid, and magnesium-DL-aspartate in water
ln csat ¼ ni Ci ð4Þ from T = (278 to 348) K. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 31, 85–91.
i Chickos, J.S., Braton, C.M., Hesse, D.G., Liebman, J.F., 1991. Estimating entropies and
enthalpies of fusion of organic compounds. J. Org. Chem. 56, 927–938.
where ni is the number of groups of type i in the solute molecule Fonseca, J.M.S., Dohrn, R., Peper, S., 2011. High-pressure fluid-phase equilibria:
and Ci is the contribution of the group of type i to ln csat. The tem- Experimental methods and systems investigated (2005–2008). Fluid Phase
perature dependence of Ci is given by Equilib. 300, 1–69.
Fornari, T., Stateva, R.P., Señorans, F.J., Reglero, G., Ibañez, E., 2008. Applying
Ci ¼ ai þ bi ðT 0 =TÞ þ ci lnðT=T 0 Þ ð5Þ UNIFAC-based models to predict the solubility of solids in subcritical water. J.
Supercrit. Fluids 46, 245–251.
2040 P. Karásek et al. / Chemosphere 90 (2013) 2035–2040

Fredenslund, A., Jones, R.L., Prausnitz, J.M., 1975. Group-contribution estimation of Miller, D.J., Hawthorne, S.B., Gizir, A.M., Clifford, A.A., 1998. Solubility of polycyclic
activity coefficients in nonideal liquid mixtures. AIChE J. 21, 1086–1099. aromatic hydrocarbons in subcritical water from 298 K to 498 K. J. Chem. Eng.
Fredenslund, A., Gmehling, J., Rasmussen, P., 1977. Vapor–Liquid Equilibria Using Data 43, 1043–1047.
UNIFAC. Elsevier, Amsterdam. Pappa, G.D., Voutsas, E.C., Magoulas, K., Tassios, D.P., 2005. Estimation of the
Gill, S.K., 1983. New developments in chemiluminescence research. Aldrichim. Acta differential molar heat capacities of organic compounds at their melting point.
16, 59–61. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44, 3799–3806.
Gmehling, J., 2009. Present status and potential of group contribution methods for Poling, B.E., Prausnitz, J.M., O’Connell, J.P., 2001. The Properties of Gases and Liquids,
process development. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 41, 731–747. fifth ed. McGraw-Hill, New York. pp. C.1–C.4.
Goodman, B.T., Wilding, W.V., Oscarson, J.L., Rowley, R.L., 2004. A note on the Prausnitz, J.M., Lichtenthaler, R.N., Gomes de Azevedo, E., 1999. Molecular
relationship between organic solid density and liquid density at the triple point. Thermodynamics of Fluid-Phase Equilibria, third ed. Prentice-Hall PTR, Upper
J. Chem. Eng. Data 49, 1512–1514. Saddle River. pp. 638–641.
Joback, K.G., Reid, R.C., 1987. Estimation of pure-component properties from group- Razmara, R.S., Daneshfar, A., Sahraei, R., 2010. Solubility of quercetin in
contributions. Chem. Eng. Commun. 57, 233–243. water + methanol and water + ethanol from (292.8 to 333.8) K. J. Chem. Eng.
Karásek, P., Planeta, J., Roth, M., 2006a. Solubility of solid polycyclic aromatic Data 55, 3934–3936.
hydrocarbons pressurized hot water at temperatures from 313 K to the melting Shinar, J., Savvateev, V., 2004. Introduction to organic light-emitting devices. In:
point. J. Chem. Eng. Data 51, 616–622. Shinar, J. (Ed.), Organic Light-Emitting Devices: A Survey. Springer-Verlag, New
Karásek, P., Planeta, J., Roth, M., 2006b. Solubility of solid polycyclic aromatic York, pp. 1–42.
hydrocarbons pressurized hot water: Correlation with pure component Shirota, Y., 2006. Charge-transporting and charge-blocking amorphous molecular
properties. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45, 4454–4460. materials for organic light-emitting diodes. In: Müllen, K., Scherf, U. (Eds.),
Karásek, P., Planeta, J., Roth, M., 2007. Aqueous solubility data for pressurized hot Organic Light Emitting Devices: Synthesis, Properties and Applications. Wiley-
water extraction for solid heterocyclic analogs of anthracene, phenanthrene and VCH, Weinheim, pp. 245–264.
fluorene. J. Chromatogr. A 1140, 195–204. Spencer, C.F., Adler, S.B., 1978. A critical review of equations for predicting saturated
Karásek, P., Planeta, J., Roth, M., 2008. Solubilities of adamantane diamantane liquid density. J. Chem. Eng. Data 23, 82–89.
pressurized hot water. J. Chem. Eng. Data 53, 816–819. Srinivas, K., King, J.W., Howard, L.R., Monrad, J.K., 2010. Solubility and solution
Karásek, P., Planeta, J., Roth, M., 2010. Group contribution correlation for aqueous thermodynamic properties of quercetin and quercetin dihydrate in subcritical
solubilities of solid aromatics, heterocycles, and diamondoids over a 200 K water. J. Food Eng. 100, 208–218.
temperature interval. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 49, 3485–3491. Strohriegl, P., Grazulevicius, J.V., 2002. Charge-transporting molecular glasses. Adv.
Linstrom, P.J., Mallard, W.G. (Eds.), 2011. NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Mater. 14, 1439–1452.
Reference Database Number 69, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Wang, L.-C., Wang, F.-A., 2004. Solubility of niacin in 3-picoline + water from
Gaithersburg MD, 20899 (<http://webbook.nist.gov>). (accessed 24.04.12) (287.65 to 359.15) K. J. Chem. Eng. Data 49, 155–156.
May, W.E., Wasik, S.P., Freeman, D.H., 1978. Determination of the aqueous solubility Zhang, D., Montañés, F., Srinivas, K., Fornari, T., Ibáñez, E., King, J.W., 2010.
of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons by a coupled column liquid Measurement and correlation of the solubility of carbohydrates in subcritical
chromatographic technique. Anal. Chem. 50, 175–179. water. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 49, 6691–6698.
Miller, D.J., Hawthorne, S.B., 1998. Method for determining the solubilities of
hydrophobic organics in subcritical water. Anal. Chem. 70, 1618–1621.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen