Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
BO MB A RD IE R CR J SE RI E S I S A R 2 0 1 1 - 09
Data Communications” section.
In the
Spotlight
IFLYBOMBARDIER
CRJ Series
David Nicholson Herman Bijl Vesna Kostadinovic An ISAR Index is included along with all
Director, Customer Services Manager, In-Service Manager, Regional Alignment & published ISARs on the iflybombardier.com
1-65-6592-5746 Engineering – Systems Customer Services, Americas customer portal.
1-450-476-7792 1-416-375-3574
The Index is sorted by ATA chapter and
Dario Leone Chris Burrell Roman Kuryluk contains every article ever published in the
Director, In-Service Supplier Mgmt., Manager, Customer Services, Manager, Entry-Into-Service ISAR.
Warranty & Fleet Services Americas 1-416-373-5295
1-416-373-5295 1-416-373-7954 Any questions can be addressed to the
editor.
Alex Jaglowitz Steve Crofton Alex Li
Director of Material Services Manager, Technical Publications Manager, Shanghai Regional www.iflybombardier.com
1-416-373-7915 1-450-476-7642 Support Office
86-21-5172-8324 Visit our website for eServices, operator
service documents, news & events,
Mervyn Lynn Martin Cudina Bertram Martin resources, discussion, forums, and much
Director, Customer Services, Manager, In-Service Manager, Customer Services, more.
Americas Engineering, Structures Acting Tokyo RSO
1-416-373-7915 1-450-476-7642 81-3-5708-7337
Royston Simon
Jeffrey MacDavid Yogesh Garg Peter Osborne Manager, Johannesburg
Director, Technical Publications Manager, Customer Services, Manager, Maintenance Programs Regional Support Office
1-450-476-7810 India RSO Acting & Planning 27-(0)11-100-5466
1-22-6124-1805 1-416-375-4007
Francine Van Erum
Robert Mobilio Paul Hamill Daniel Parente Manager, Customer Services,
Director, In-Service Engineering Manager, Mobile Repair Team Manager, Technical Help Desk Americas
and Technical Support 1-416-375-3620 1-450-476-5857 1-450-476-7570
1-416-373-7937
David Young
Firas Saleh Ross Hitchins Harlan Simpkins Manager, Fleet Services
Director, Commercial Aircraft Manager, Customer Services, Chief Customer Liaison Pilot, 1-416-375-3914
Training Americas Customer Services
1-514-344-7018 1-416-375-3454 1- 416-375-4278
0002
Introducing Our New, Recurring Digital Data *New Section!
Communications (DDC) Section
All Series
page 19
0001
Applicability: CRJ200
Boliviana de Aviacón’s Plan to Link its Home Country by Air
Details contributed by: Engineer Ronald Casso C., General Manager, Boliviana de Aviación; and Nick Del Vecchio, Field Service Representative
Many airlines worldwide take a pride in the communities that they serve, both large and small. Not only do they call
these regions home, but it is where the vast majority of their passengers do as well. Boliviana de Aviacion (BoA), the
Bolivian state airline, is no different.
Through a project called "Regional BoA," Boliviana de Aviacion is looking to link its home country while growing its
commercial air flights. Ultimately, the initiative is meant to provide air transportation at the highest levels of quality and
safety to all intermediate cities in Bolivia.
Yet to discuss the airline’s future, it is important to know its past.
BoA was born on October 24, 2007, and began its operations in 2009, flying the principal routes within the country
(Cochabamba, La Paz and Santa Cruz). After finding success on these routes, the company began operating to Tarija,
Sucre and Cobija as well. Continuing this ambitious route expansion, on May 14, 2010, BoA started flying
internationally to Buenos Aires, Argentina and to Sao Paulo, Brazil. Two years later, operations began in Madrid,
Spain, followed shortly afterwards with a new route to Miami, USA.
These decisions were made in large part due to the growth in interest in commercial air flights within the region, which
meant a considerable increase in passengers who were looking to travel by air to different locations within the country.
BoA saw this as a wonderful opportunity to integrate Bolivia, and their eyes are still firmly fixed upon that goal. This is
why "Regional BoA" was created, opening new routes to: Uyuni, Rurrenabaque, Guayaramerín, Oruro, Potosi,
Riberalta, Yacuiba, Puerto Suarez and Chimoré.
Yet reaching this target meant that the airline would need more aircraft to boost capacity. BoA’s search led them to
Bombardier’s CRJ200 aircraft, a decision that was made due to the airline’s belief that the aircraft is more efficient than
its peers of the same capacity, and boasts numerous advantages for operating within the region. The fact that the
CRJ200 has the capacity to transport 50 people made it ideal for BoA’s new secondary markets. The airline took two.
The next stage of the “Regional BoA” project will see them adding even more aircraft, further increasing tourist
destination options within the country. Yet the airline will only continue to grow if it ensures that it can do so properly.
This is why BoA has continued to raise its own internal quality and safety standards, treating its main routes and
secondary ones with equal importance. With a plan like this, the company believes it can continue to grow throughout
Bolivia, If their past success is any indicator, they are well on their way.
For more information regarding Boliviana de Aviacón, you can head to: https://www.boa.bo/BoAWebSite/
You can also follow Boliviana de Aviacón on Facebook, and on Twitter @BoABolivia.
0100
Applicability: All CRJ Series
Fault Isolation Improvements
Contributed by: Peter Baker, Field Service Representative
Over the years, there have been many FIM improvements completed. The majority of these FIM changes are driven
by recommendations from the Aircraft Economics Working Group (AEWG), while others have been driven by
recommendations from the Technical Steering Committee (TSC). After experiencing several projects firsthand, this
article will highlight a few recent FIM improvements/rewrites that we believe can have a significant impact on fault
isolation and rectification.
CRJ200/700/900 Phase IV
The creation of a team for this group was driven by a request from the TSC after reviewing the DR (Dispatch
Reliability) information for the Passenger Door System. It was determined that the door and its subsystems had a
substantial impact on operator DR. The team consisted of participants from several operators, along with Field Service
Representatives (FSRs) and members of In-Service Engineering and Technical Publications. The team reviewed
approximately two years’ worth of operator data to define the main drivers. From this we created the following five
main FIM subjects. A number of the new procedures have been issued out as temporary revisions and will be included
in the appropriate FIMs during the next revision cycle:
This working group was formed via the AEWG after reviewing the data showing the HSTAB as being a main driver of
operator DR. This team was also comprised of operators, FSRs, and ISE and Technical Publications representatives.
The following flowcharts have been generated to simplify troubleshooting:
There are currently a number of FIM improvements underway and I would encourage operators to get involved with
these worthwhile projects. For more information about the ongoing FIM projects, you can contact your local FSR, or a
member of the TSC or AEWG. Most operators have representation within these groups.
3250
Applicability: CRJ700/900/1000
NWS Auto-rigging Inhibited
Contributed by: Claude Perron, Field Service Representative
Bombardier was recently involved in the troubleshooting of a Nose Wheel Steering (NWS) issue, and would like to
share what was learned. A CRJ700 was in the hangar for a few days for various maintenance activities. During that
period, the NWS ECU was removed to service another aircraft on the line. A new NWS ECU was received and
installed, but maintenance was unable to Autorig the new unit per AMM procedure, since an AUTORIGGING
INHIBITED message was always showing. No other maintenance performed on the airplane should have affected the
NWS system, so it should have been a straightforward install and test.
Following the instructions provided in AMM task 32-51-05-820-801 for capturing the RVDT's value into the new ECU,
the end result was always an Autorigging Inhibited message, although the preconditions were met and the Rudder
RVDT position was within tolerance, as shown in the MDC Rigging page. The other odd indication at this point was
that the STEERING INOP message was posted as soon as the NWS was switched ON, but since the system was not
rigged yet, we disregarded that message at first.
Reviewing the MDC current and history fault pages did not
reveal anything significant to help us with this problem. We then
started to revisit the preconditions to ensure none were missed.
We were confident that the first four were in the correct
conditions, but we started to question condition 5 -
HYDRAULICS SELECTED OFF. Our clue to look further into
condition 5 was the posting of the STEERING INOP message
with hydraulics system 3 off and bled to 0 PSI. In such case
and in normal condition, the NWS ECU knows that there is no
hydraulics pressure from system 3, so it will inhibit the
STEERING INOP message even if the NWS is selected ON.
Since the message was posting, it meant that the NWS ECU
was receiving the information that Hydraulics pressure was
available from system 3; however, the pressure switch located
on the NWS steering manifold was not detecting that pressure,
thus the posting of that message. The team began to suspect a
hydraulic pressure switch failed in HIGH pressure mode, which
was most likely the reason why the rigging was inhibited as
well.
The team looked at the schematics and discovered that disconnecting pressure switches MT128 and MT129 would
easily simulate a LOW pressure mode. Both pressure switches are mounted on the # 3 pressure manifold, easily
accessible from the aft wing belly fairing access panel. After disconnecting both pressure switches, the STEERING
INOP was not posted and the autorigging could be completed successfully. Our next step was to reconnect them one at
a time to identify which pressure switch failed in HIGH pressure mode. In our case, it was the pressure switch pointing
down. It was most likely contaminated with hydraulic fluid, since the connector itself showed traces of contamination.
After replacing the pressure switch, the NWS was rigged and the aircraft returned to service.
In conclusion, if you have a STEERING INOP with no hydraulic pressure in system 3, one of these two pressure
switches should be suspected. It is also important to note that preconditions provided when entering the MDC test and
rigging pages can be easily overlooked. If something does not work while testing or rigging using the MDC, return back
to the preconditions page; it might provide you with a valuable clue.
3400
Applicability: CRJ700/900/1000
ADS-B Current Fault and EICAS Status Messages
Contributed by: Michael Robinson, Field Service Representative
Reference: Modsum 670T122227, 698T130052, SB 670BA-34-044 and ISAR 2016-03-3400
ISAR 2016-03-3400 provided background information on the incorporation of ADS-B as a baseline installation on
production aircraft (effective 10345/15390/19042). During maintenance, aircraft with ADS-B incorporated have been
observed posting two MDC Current Faults when the aircraft is in the hangar:
These messages are posted due to the GPS system not being able to receive signals as the aircraft is in the hangar.
An easy way to validate this condition is to verify that GNSS NOT AVAILABLE is posted on the FMS CDU.
It was also observed that the following EICAS Status messages were posted:
ADS-B OUT 1 FAIL
ADS-B OUT 2 FAIL.
These messages will be posted when the ATC SEL Switch is in STBY. When the ATC SEL Switch is in 1, the ADS-B
OUT 2 FAIL Status message will be posted. When ATC SEL is in 2, the ADS-B OUT 1 FAIL Status message will be
posted.
Note: Loss of the GPS satellite signal can also occur when parked at the gate if aircraft GPS antenna do not have line
of site to the GPS Satellite. Also If Hangar GPS repeaters are used, be aware that if hangar doors are open, the GPS
may fail or become confused if it receives a GPS signal from the HGR GPS repeater at the same time as the Satellite
GPS signal from the outside. To reset this fault mode, move the aircraft outside and reset the power to the aircraft
GPS system.
ATC SELECTOR
5123
Applicability: CRJ700/900/1000
Underfloor Structure FS280-FS437 – Corrosion Protection
Contributed by: Johanne Forcier and Ivan Mantulescu, ISE Structures, M&P
Reference: AMM Task 51-23-00-395-826, Application of water displacing CIC
MRB Report – Corrosion Prevention & Control Program
Maintenance Review Board Report – Zonal Inspection Program, Water Ingress & Corrosion Management
Some operators of CRJ Series aircraft have experienced corrosion issues under the floor structure between FS280
and FS437 (Figure 1 and Figure 2 ref.), most specifically between stringers 24L – 24R. This area is well known to be
prone to corrosion due to moisture and water ingress. Bombardier investigated and has identified mitigating actions
which, once implemented, will help to minimize the impact of corrosion to the overall CRJ Series aircraft fleet at this
area. These recommendations are part of Memo ISE-STR-16-022, available to operators via CRJ Series ISE
Structures Working Group (SWG) – Updates.
All areas below the floor structure are sprayed in production with Corrosion Inhibiting Compounds (CICs). Over the
years, the CIC film degrades and offers reduced protection against corrosion for aircraft in service. For aircraft
operating in severe environments, this degradation can be even faster. Since CRJ Series aircraft are operating in
various environments, it is impossible to establish a standard fleet-wide schedule for the inspection and re-application
of CICs.
Based on experience and the reported corrosion findings, it has been demonstrated that inspection of corrosion-prone
areas at regular intervals and reapplication of CICs can significantly reduce corrosion, since corrective actions when
required are implemented at an early stage of the corrosion process. The underfloor structure is inspected at intervals
of 6000 or 12000FH, depending on the area. Where more severe environmental conditions are encountered, operators
may want to consider inspection of the critical areas for the condition of the CIC, and consider its removal and
reapplication at each 6000FH (or C-check) in order to ensure coverage remains robust from check to check.
In order to minimize the impact of corrosion under the floor structure, Bombardier recommends the following to
operators:
Implementation of the visual inspection/cleaning schedule between FS280.00-FS437.0-0 and between stringers
24L-24R to look for condition of the CIC, cleanliness of area, water/moisture ingress and the condition of the
insulation blankets.
To facilitate the inspection, all insulation blankets in this area should be removed and replaced if compromised.
Ensure all areas of pooling water are removed, dried and cleaned per SRM task 51-26-00.
Make sure frames cut out for stringers are clean from an excess of sealant, dirt or grime.
Ensure all drain paths are clear. Regularly perform inspections for drain conditions in order to ensure that all
drain tubes are free of any dirt (Figure 3 and Figure 4 ref.), and are oriented towards the skin drain flappers.
Operators may also consider establishing a short interval inspection plan in order to perform regular visual inspection
of the CIC film under the floor structure. The inspection plan should implement regular visual inspections at an interval
that is convenient to the particular operation and as dictated by the operational environment. A number of operators
have implemented a regular inspection and cleaning task every 600-800 FH. This inspection will allow corrective
actions to be implemented when required, and to remove water accumulation at the bottom of the fuselage when
present in order to keep the surface dry. These actions will help to prevent corrosion.
Application of CIC films shall be completed in accordance with manufacturer instructions. Most of the CIC
manufacturers developed their own products specifically designed to easily and effectively remove CICs. Also, even if
it is acceptable to apply new CIC films over existing CIC films as long as they are clean and uncontaminated,
Bombardier does not recommend that approach for areas prone to severe corrosion. Operators should consider
removing and reapplying CICs in accordance with AMM task 51-23-00-390-826. Bombardier recommends the use of
Ardrox 23 (BAMS 565-006 Type V) when reapplying CICs due to their high penetrating capability and improved
corrosion resistance (over 3,000 hours in salt spray testing).
In conclusion, regular inspections performed at short intervals for the condition of CICs, cleanliness of area,
water/moisture ingress and the condition of insulation blankets will significantly decrease the presence of corrosion
under the floor structure. That being said, Bombardier is still investigating new ways to efficiently minimize corrosion at
this area, such as application of self-leveling green, the addition of dryliners, and drain tube relocalization.
5131
Applicability: All CRJ Series
Clarification Regarding AeroShell Grease 33MS Versus AeroShell 64
Contributed by: Robert Lachambre, Customer Response Centre
Reference: AMM Consumable Table 51-31-00 / Aeroshell Document
This ISAR article is intended to clarify the reason why the grease manufacturer has changed the brand name of
AeroShell grease 33MS to AeroShell 64.
Since the introduction of AeroShell grease 64 in replacement of AeroShell grease 33MS, requests for clarification
regarding the interchangeability of these two products from the Technical Help Desk has increased.
High-performance AeroShell 33 has been used by most major commercial operators for general purpose airframe
grease application. It boasts exceptional anti-corrosion and anti-wear performance, while shrinking grease inventory
and reducing the risk of misapplication.
However, for high-loaded applications such as sliding application on the airframe (where the additional boost of
molybdenum disulphide was required), the grease manufacturer developed AeroShell grease 33MS, which shares the
same advanced grease technology as its parent. Grease AeroShell 33MS is approved per MIL-21164D specification,
and improves performance in all highly-stressed airframe applications where this grease is specified.
A number of customer and OEMs have raised concerns about the close similarity between these two products
(AeroShell grease 33 and AeroShell grease 33MS [different application]), and the possibility of the wrong grease
inadvertently being used in the wrong application (general-purpose grease used in a high-loaded area).
In light of this, the grease manufacturer’s best option to prevent the situation was to rename AeroShell grease 33MS
as AeroShell 64. The name of the product is based on the last two digits of the specification. Both products are
approved per the MIL spec MIL –G-21164D. This action was taken to eliminate the possibility of intermixing both
AeroShell grease 33 types and thereby eliminating all previous operator concerns.
Note: Please note this is purely a change to the product name and the product still remains fully approved per
MIL-G-211464D.
All CRJ Series programs’ consumable tables were revised to include this new brand name accordingly.
AeroShell 64 grease can be found in AMM chapter 51-31-00’s CRJ200 consumable table under item 04-13, and in the
CRJ700/900 table under item 04-17.
5741
Applicability: CRJ700/900/1000
Generic Repair to Slat Tracks USING HVOF Thermal Spraying
Contributed by: Eric Bedard, In Service Engineering
Reference: Generic REO 670-57-42-451
As published in ISAR 2016-01-5742, Bombardier has released information related to a new repair (per Generic REO
670-57-42-451), to repair Slat Tracks using HVOF Tungsten’s thermal spraying.
Currently, Bombardier (BA) is supporting repair (blending damaged surfaces) of slat tracks with wear to a maximum
limit of 0.010 inches on the upper and lower surfaces, and 0.008 inches on the sides of the slat track, via specific
REO. The actual limits are imposed by system rigging requirements. Note that Generic REO 670-57-42-451, which
provides permanent repair of the slat track surfaces, is available. This Generic REO has a limit of 0.010 inches on all
surfaces of the track. Limitation of this Generic REO is imposed by stress limitation. For any slat tracks with wear
above the 0.010 inch limit, a similar repair can be performed, however a specific REO may be required by BA; thus
operators may expect an increased repair cost for these specific units if a repair is deemed acceptable.
Operators can still perform specific repairs to acceptable wear limits, but are encouraged to perform resurfacing per
Generic REO 670-57-42-451, prior to reaching the 0.010 inch limit. Approved repair facility Aerospace Welding (AW) is
currently in the process of building a full set of rotable parts (quantity: 18) to minimize maintenance downtime when
slat tracks are removed and sent out for resurfacing. Therefore, BA recommends that operators contact AW for any
slat track found with wear within the Generic REO limitation.
The material in this section originates from the Technical Publications department. General inquiries can be addressed to
Ronald Smith, Manager (email: ronald.smith@aero.bombardier.com; telephone: 1-450-476-7642).
Abbreviations
AFM Airplane Flight Manual ITEM Illustrated Tools & Equipment Manual PPGRM Power Plant Ground Run Manual
APM Airport Planning Manual MFEPM Maint. Facilities & Equipment Planning Manual QRH Quick Reference Handbook
AIPC Aircraft Illustrated Parts Catalog MMEL Master Minimum Equipment List RDH Refuel Defuel Handbook
AMM Aircraft Maintenance Manual MPD Maintenance Planning Document SDIR Structural Deviation Inspection Repair
CMM Component Maintenance Manual MPM Maintenance Planning Manual SDS System Description Section
DDG Dispatch Deviation Guide MRM Maintenance Requirements Manual SRM Structural Repair Manual
ESPM Electrical/Electronic Components - Standard Practices Manual NDT Nondestructive Testing Manual SSM System Schematic Manual
FCOM Flight Crew Operating Manual PCL Pilot CheckList WBM Weight and Balance Manual
FIM Fault Isolation Manual PPBM Power Plant Buildup Manual WDM Wiring Diagram Manual
: PLANNED: R SHIPPED: R Latest aircraft S/N coverage for manual revision is noted. UPDATED: 2 0 1 6 - 0 6 - 0 6
Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) Revision 65 Flight Crew Operating Manual Volume 1 (FCOM1) Revision 64
Flight Crew Operating Manual Volume 2 (FCOM2) Revision 65 Pilot Checklist (PCL) Revision 8
Quick Reference Handbook Volume 1 (QRH1) Revision 63 Quick Reference Handbook Volume 2 (QRH2) Revision 65
2016 2017
FLIGHT MANUALS
CURRENT REV. JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN
DDG - EASA 15 NO REVISION SCHEDULED
DDG - FAA 13 NO REVISION SCHEDULED
DDG - TC 14 NO REVISION SCHEDULED
**Flight Manuals Collection
17 R17
(700)
**Flight Manuals Collection
13 R13
(900)
**Flight Manuals Collection
12 R12
(1000)
MMEL - EASA 20 NO REVISION SCHEDULED
MMEL - TC 20 NO REVISION SCHEDULED
**Flight Manuals (Master) Collection (CRJ700) Rev. 17: **Flight Manuals (Master) Collection (CRJ900) Rev. 13: **Flight Manuals (Master) Collection (CRJ1000) Rev. 12:
Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) Rev. 17 Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) Rev. 13 Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) Rev. 12
Flight Crew Operating Manual Volume 1 (FCOM1) Rev. 14 Flight Crew Operating Manual Volume 1 (FCOM1) Rev. 12 Flight Crew Operating Manual Volume 1 (FCOM1) Rev. 9
Flight Crew Operating Manual Volume 2 (FCOM2) Rev. 17 Flight Crew Operating Manual Volume 2 (FCOM2) Rev. 13 Flight Crew Operating Manual Volume 2 (FCOM2) Rev. 12
Pilot Checklist (PCL) Rev.14 Pilot Checklist (PCL) Rev. 9 Pilot Checklist (PCL) Rev. 6
Quick Reference Handbook Volume 1 (QRH1) Rev. 16 Quick Reference Handbook Volume 1 (QRH1) Rev. 12 Quick Reference Handbook Volume 1 (QRH1) Rev. 12
Quick Reference Handbook Volume 2 (QRH2) Rev. 16 Quick Reference Handbook Volume 2 (QRH2) Rev. 13 Quick Reference Handbook Volume 2 (QRH2) Rev. 12
0002
Applicability: All Series
Introducing Our New, Recurring Digital Data Communications (DDC) Section
Contributed by: Paul McCormack, Senior Analyst, Publication Services
In an effort to provide customers with up-to-date information and proactively answer questions that operators may
have regarding our Publication Services, we are pleased to announce that we are launching a new section in the
ISAR entitled “Digital Data Communications.” In this section, we will discuss everything from summaries of our latest
DDACs, to answers to general queries, to tips on how to get the most out of your Bombardier publications. We also
want to hear your suggestions on what we can and should be covering, so please feel free to send me an email at:
paul.mccormack@aero.bombardier.com.
Hopefully, this section will become a useful resource for you and your teams going forwards! For now, we will kick
things off with a summary of our latest Digital Data Advisory Conference, held in Toronto, Ontario from May 18 - 19th.
Our latest DDAC took place at our Toronto site in mid-May, where we had a great turnout (see photo below).
Throughout the two-day event, we covered numerous important topics, including structured mark-up deliverables, the
future of Technical Publications software technology, and new opportunities in sales and delivery. We look forward to
future meetings, as these can often serve as a great springboard to future plans and initiatives.
The material in this section originates from the Maintenance Programs and Planning, Maintenance Data Analysis, and Aircraft
Economics groups. Inquiries should be addressed, as applicable, to either Peter Osborne, Manager of Maintenance Programs and
Planning (peter.osborne@aero.bombardier.com), or Mohammad (KK) Khan, Manager of Maintenance Data Analysis and Aircraft
Economics (mohammad.khan@aero.bombardier.com). The latest Maintenance Engineering initiatives can be viewed through
www.iflybombardier.com.
Back to Table of Contents
The material in this section originates from the Maintenance Programs and Planning, Maintenance Data Analysis, and Aircraft
Economics groups. Inquiries should be addressed, as applicable, to either Peter Osborne, Manager of Maintenance Programs and
Planning (peter.osborne@aero.bombardier.com), or Mohammad (KK) Khan, Manager of Maintenance Data Analysis and Aircraft
Economics (mohammad.khan@aero.bombardier.com). The latest Maintenance Engineering initiatives can be viewed through
www.iflybombardier.com customer portal.
The material in this section originates from the Maintenance Programs and Planning, Maintenance Data Analysis, and Aircraft
Economics groups. Inquiries should be addressed, as applicable, to either Peter Osborne, Manager of Maintenance Programs and
Planning (peter.osborne@aero.bombardier.com), or Mohammad (KK) Khan, Manager of Maintenance Data Analysis and Aircraft
Economics (mohammad.khan@aero.bombardier.com). The latest Maintenance Engineering initiatives can be viewed through
www.iflybombardier.com customer portal.
8011 - STARTING
All published Service Letters, All Operator Messages, Generic Reference Instruction Letters, and Generic In-Service Modsums
are available through www.iflybombardier.com.
Note: Obsolete (closed) RILs should be removed from operators' manuals.
All published Service Letters, All Operator Messages, Generic Reference Instruction Letters, and Generic In-Service Modsums
are available through www.iflybombardier.com.
Note: Obsolete (closed) RILs should be removed from operators' manuals.
To access past issues of Flight Deck, please log in to NEW: TCG2015A was issued in September 2015.
www.iflybombardier.com and look under Resources >
Newsletters.
To get your aircraft the service it deserves, contact our Bombardier Service Center teams at:
Phone: +1-520-991-6155
Email: don.nolan@aero.bombardier.com
CRJ SERIES ISAR 2016-06 - Page 27
For more information on our Service Centres and backshop capabilities, open ISAR 2015-05 and view its cover story.
Mobile Repair Team
• Structural repair
• Aircraft recovery
• Repair estimates
• Daily schedule reporting and project
duration forecasting