Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1
JurisKnowledge
LAW OF CRIMES - II (CRPC) – AS PER MY UNDERSTANDING
Q1. Inquiry Q1. What is the distinction among investigation inquiry and trial?
Q2. Acquittal Q2. Define F.I.R and complaint and bring out their differences?
Q3. Statement of accused under Section 313 Cr. PC. Q3. What is the effect of Non-appearence or death of complaint in a trial of "Summon's case" by a
magistrate?
Q4. Charge
Q4. Can a court alter a charge?
Q5. Two duties of a probation officer
Q5. Give two duties of a "Probation officer"?
Part B: (10 marks question. Attempt any 2) Part B: (10 marks question. Attempt any 2)
Q6. Discuss the procedure to be followed by a magistrate in a Summary Trial Q6. What are constitutional and legal rights of an arrested person?
Q7. What is Joinder of Charges? Q7. Which court can take cognizance of an offence for initiation of proceedings?
Q8. What do you mean by Summoning u/s 204 of Cr. PC. Q8. How are the proceedings commenced before a Magistrate under Section 204 of code of criminal
procedure. 1973?
Part C: (20 marks question. Attempt any 3) Part C: (20 marks question. Attempt any 3)
Q9. Discuss the constitution, functions and powers of Criminal Courts under Criminal Q9. What are the different criminal courts established under Cr. P.C. in a district? Write about each one.
Procedure Code. Also write about their powers?
Q10. How will an Investigation Officer proceed on receiving F.I.R in a cognizable offence? Q10. What is a Bill? Discuss rules relating to bill in "Non-bailable" offences. When can an accused claim Bail
as a matter of right under code of criminal procedure?
Q11. What is the procedure for a trial of an offence by Sessions Court.
Q11. Are the statements of the witnesses and the accused persons recorded by a Police officer during the
Q12. How is a "Warrant Case" instituted on Police Report tried by a Magistrate? course of investigation admissible in evidence? If so, how they can be used in a criminal proceedings?
Q13. Critically examine the provisions of Juvenile Justice Act in the light of latest amendments. Q12. Define "Charge". Discuss the rules which govern the joinder of "Charges".
Q13. Write about Magistrate Trial of warrant case instituted on a police report.
Q1. Inquiry
Q2. Investigation
Q3. Discharge
Q4. Acquittal
Q9. Discuss the classes of criminal courts and their powers and mention sentences which may be passed by
them.
Q10. Discuss the procedure regarding removal of nuisance under criminal procedural code 1973
Q11. Discuss the procedure followed by police in a cognizable offence after FIR has been lodge
Q12. Discuss the powers of court to release certain offenders after admonition under the probation of Offenders
Act, 1958
Q13. What do you understand by "Juvenile Justice"? Why not a juvenile having completed 16 years of age be
treated like a major common offender if he has committed henious sort of offence? Give your opinion.
Q14. Discuss the power and procedure followed by police under Section 41 and 41 (A) of Criminal Procedural
Code, 1973 when a person arrested without warrant.
Charge: Section 2(b) defines it as “any heads of charge when Bailable Offence: Section 2(a) defines it as “Bailable offence
the charge contains more heads than one”. means an offence which is shown as bailable in the First
In layman’s term, charge means the allegations or offences Schedule, or which is made bailable by any other law for the
that have been hurled on the person. Charge is not a form but time being in force; and “non-bailable offence” means any
the charge that is levied against the accused is mentioned in other offence;
the charge sheet, which is the form of charge.
High Courts
District Judge District Judge and District & Session Judge Board of Revenue
Small Cause Court, Lok Adalat III Class Magistrate Assistant Tehsildar
High Courts
Metropolitan
Judicial Magistrate of Judicial Magistrate of Executive
Court of Sessions Magistrates (in
the first class the second class Magistrates
metropolitan areas)
- District Court is referred to as Session These Courts may be These Courts may be - In every district and in every
Court when it exercises its jurisdiction
These Courts are on the metropolitan area, the State
on criminal matters under The Code established by the State established by the State second lowest level of the Government may appoint as many
of Criminal Procedure. Government in consultation Government in consultation persons as it thinks fit to be Executive
- The Sessions Court is responsible for Criminal Court structure in Magistrates and shall appoint one of
with the High Court of the with the High Court of the
adjudicating matters related to
respective State, at such respective State, at such
India. These Courts may be them to be the District Magistrate.
criminal cases. The court is - Subject to the control of the State
responsible for cases relating to places in the district and in places in the district and in established by the State Government, the District Magistrate
murders, theft, dacoity, pick- may, from time to time, define the
pocketing and other such cases. any number by issuing a any number by issuing a Government in local limits of the areas within which
- Sessions court has the power to notification. According to notification. As per Section consultation with the High the Executive Magistrates may
impose the full range of penalties for exercise all or any of the powers with
criminal acts, including the death
Section 29 of the CrPc., a 29 (3) of Cr.P.C., these Courts Court of the respective which they may be invested under
penalty Judicial Magistrate of First shall reward imprisonment State, at such places in this Code.
- Sessions Courts heard each case Class may pass a sentence of for a term not exceeding one - Except as otherwise provided by such
continuously in sessions and every metropolitan area definition, the jurisdiction and powers
delivered judgements immediately on imprisonment for a term not year, or fine not exceeding of every such Magistrate shall extend
completion of arguments. Hence the exceeding three years, or of one thousand rupees, or
and in any number by throughout the district
name 'Sessions Court' meant that the
fine not exceeding ten both. issuing a notification.
cases would be disposed off
expeditiously. thousand rupees or of both
Section 41 to 44 contain provisions that govern the arrest of a person by police and private citizens, while Section 46 describes how an arrest is a made
Cr.P.C contemplates
two types of arrests
Who can
Arrest?
Arrest by Arrest by
An arrest that is made Arrest by
An arrest that is made Police Private
for the execution of a
without any warrant but Magistrate
in accordance with Officer Person
warrant issued by a
some legal provision
magistrate and;
that permits arrest.
Section 42 allows a police officer to arrest a person for a non-cognizable offence, if he refuses to give his name and residence.
- As per Section 42(1), if the person has committed or has been accused of committing a non-cognizable offence refuses to share his name and residence, he may be arrested by such
officer in order that his name or residence may be ascertained.
- As per sub clause (2), the person must be released when the true name and residence of such person have been ascertained.
- As per sub clause (3), should the true name and residence of such person not be ascertained within twenty-four hours from the time of arrest, he shall forthwith be forwarded to the
nearest Magistrate having jurisdiction.
As per Section 43(1), any private person may arrest or cause to be arrested any person who in his presence commits a non-bailable and cognizable offence,
or any proclaimed offender, and, without unnecessary delay, shall make over or cause to be made over any person so arrested to a police officer, or, in the
absence of a police officer, take such person or cause him to be taken in custody to the nearest police station. Thus, if a person is drunk and is committing
assault on others, he may be rightly arrested by any citizen and taken to the nearest police station.
In case of a non-
The private person must cognizable offence, the
If the person is arrested, as
take the arrested person police officer will ask his
per Section 50A, the
to the police officer or name and residence (as
The Police officer will arrest police officer is obligatory
police station without any per Section 42)…and
him if he falls under the to inform his friends and Police officer is bound to Lastly, Magistrate must be
reasonable delay. If he follow the procedure laid
provisions / reasons stated relatives. Police officer share the RIGHTS of the satisfied on the procedure
keeps the person in his in Section 42 (either
in Section 41 (in case of a shall record an entry in the arrested person to him. of arrest.
own custody, he will be release him if he shares his
cognizable offence) arrest record book sharing
guilty of wrongful name and residence OR
the person who has been
confinement as given in arrest him for further
informed about his arrest.
Section 342 of IPC procedure as per Section
42)
Further, Section 44(2) states that any Magistrate (whether Executive or Judicial),
may at any time arrest or direct the arrest, in his presence to issue a warrant.
Magistrates have wider power than private citizen. A magistrate can arrest on
the ground of any offence and not only on cognizable offence.
The arrested person must be produced before another magistrate within 24
hours, otherwise his detention will be illegal.
Consequences of non-
compliances related to
arrest
Rights of an Arrested
Person
6. Right to be
7. Right to be
2. Right to be 4. Right to consult 5. Right to free legal informed about the
1. Right to know the 3. Right to be taken examined by a
informed of the Legal Practitioner - aid - Article 21 of right to inform of his
grounds of arrest - to magistrate medical
provision for bail - Article 22 (1) of constitution and arrest to his relative
Section 50(1) without delay practitioner –
Section 50(2) constitution Section 304 or friend – Section
Section 54
50A
• Every police officer or - Offences of non-serious - Article 22(2) gives a - For conducting a fair trial - Section 304 provides If the person is - While Section 53 allows a
other person arresting any nature don’t require an fundamental right to the it is absolutely necessary police officer to get the
person without warrant
the provision of arrested, as per
offender to be in arrested person that he that the accused person accused examined by a
assigning a pleader
shall forthwith
custody. For such must be produced is able to consult with a Section 50A, the registered medical
communicate to him full before a magistrate legal practitioner whom (where the accused practitioner, Section
particulars of the offence offences, Cr.P.C allows
within 24 hours of arrest he trusts. does not have the police officer is 54(1) gives the accused
the offender to ask for
for which he is arrested or
(excluding the time - Article 22(1) states that means to hire a legal obligatory to inform a right to get himself
other grounds for such bail as a matter of right.
arrest. - Section 50(2), provides
necessary for the journey no person who is practitioner) his friends and examined by a
from the place of arrest arrested shall be denied registered medical
• The same provision exists in that where a police
to the court of the the right to consult, and
- In Article 21, which relatives. Police practitioner.
case of an arrest made officer arrests any gives fundamental
under a warrant in Section magistrate) to be defended by, a officer shall record - While Section 53 is meant
person for a non-serious right to life and
75. In this case, the police
offence, he shall inform
- This is meant to prevent legal practitioner of his an entry in the arrest to aid the police in
officer or any person abuse of police power choice. It is up to the liberty, the state is investigation, Section
making arrest under the person arrested that and to prevent the use arrested person to under constitutional
record book sharing 54(1) is meant for the
warrant must notify the he is entitled to be of a police station as a contact and appoint a mandate to provide the person who has accused to prove his
substance of the warrant released on bail and prison. It prevents arrest such a legal practitioner innocence. This right can
to the person being that he may arrange for merely for the purpose of (not a State free legal aid to an been informed also be used by the
arrested and if required, sureties on his behalf. extracting confessions. Responsibility) indigent accused about his arrest. accused to prove that
must show the warrant. person he was subjected to
physical injury.
Created By: www.jurisknowledge.com
17
JurisKnowledge
BAIL – BAILABLE VS. NON-BAILABLE OFFENCE
Bailable Offence: Section 2(a) defines it as Non-Bailable Offence: Any offence that is
“Bailable offence means an offence which not a “bailable offence” is a “non-
is shown as bailable in the First Schedule, or bailbalbe offence”
which is made bailable by any other law
for the time being in force; and “non- Non-bailable offences include offences
bailable offence” means any other such as murder, threatening a person to
offence; give false evidence, and failure by a
person released on bail or bond to appeal
The definition simply makes those offences before court.
as bailable which are listed as so in the First
Schedule of Cr P C. These offences include
offences such as obstructing a public
servant from discharging his duties, bribing
an election official, and providing false
evidence. “Bailable offences” are of
relatively less severity.
Section 436: When a person is detained for a Section 436 (A) allows a person to be
bailbale offence, the person must be released on his own surety if he has already Section 440(1): States that the amount of
released on bail. Officer or court, if he or it spent half the maximum sentence provided bond / bail shall not be excessive. The right
thinks fit, may, instead of taking bail from for the alleged crime in jail. However, this to bail cannot be nullified by imposing a very
such person, discharge him on his executing does not apply if death is one of the high amount for bail.
a bond without sureties for his appearance. punishments specified for the offence.
Conditions on Bail
If the investigation is not done within 24 hours, the arrested person must
If, in any case triable by a Magistrate, the trial of an be bought before the court and if required, the police must make a
accused of any non-bailable offence is not After the conclusion of the trial and before judgment case to extend the detention. The court may extend the detention by
concluded within a period of sixty days from the first is delivered, if the Court is of opinion that there are 15 days.
date fixed for taking evidence in the case, such reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is However, the detention cannot extend more than 60 days (or 90 days,
if the offence is punishable by death or imprisonment for life), after
person shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of not guilty, it shall release the accused which the accused must be released on bail.
the Magistrate This provision applies for bailable as well as non-bailable offence.
Anticipatory bail is technically an incorrect term because a bail can be given only if a person has already been arrested. In this case,
the court directs that the person be released on bail as soon as he is arrested. Thus, it is a direction to provide bail and not the bail
itself.
The code classifies all criminal cases into summons cases and warrant cases. A case is
a warrant case if the offence is punishable by death, imprisonment for life or
imprisonment for more than two years. A summons case is a case that is not a warrant
case. Thus, The basis of classification is the seriousness of the offence. Since summons
case contains a lesser sentence, there is less probability of the accused violating the
court order. Therefore, generally, a summons is issued for a summons case and a
Ways of compelling
warrant is issued for a warrant case. However, when a Summons is not productive in
making a person appear before the court, the count may issue a warrant to a police
appearance
officer or any other person to forcibly produce the required person before the court.
A Summons is a process issued by a Court, calling upon While Summons is an order of the court to the When a person is hiding from his place of residence so as to
a person to appear before a Magistrate. It is used for the person to appear before it, Warrant is an order of frustrate the execution of a warrant of arrest, he is said have
purpose of notifying an individual of his legal obligation absconded. A person may hide within his residence or outside
the court given to a third person to bring the away from his residence. If a person comes to know about
to appear before the Magistrate as a response to a person who is required to be present in the court, in the issuance of a process against him or if he anticipates such
violation of the law. It is addressed to a defendant in a
the court. A warrant of arrest is a written authority a process and hides or quits the country, he is said to have
legal proceeding. Typically, the summons will announce
given by a competent magistrate for the arrest of a absconded. If the court has reason to believe that a person
to the person to whom it is directed that a legal has absconded to avoid the execution of his arrest warrant,
proceeding has been started against that person, and person. It is a more drastic step than the issue of a
the court may publish a written proclamation requiring such
that a file has been started in the court records. The summons. It is addressed to a person, usually a person to appear before it at the specified place and time.
summons announces a date and time on which the police officer, to apprehend and produce the The date and time of appearance must not be less than thirty
person must appear in court. offender in front of the court. days from the date of proclamation.
It is the last stage of the trial where the accused is either convicted
A trial is initiated by the prosecution who tries to prove the guilt of the Under Section 229 of Cr.P.C. an accused may plead or acquitted. Under Section 232 of the Code, an accused can be
accused through evidence. Section 225 of the Code lays down that acquitted if the Court after hearing both the parties and considering
the case of prosecution shall be conducted by a Public Prosecutor guilty before the Court and upon such pleading, the all the evidence, considers that there no evidence which proves the
where the trial is before a Court of Session. Court on his discretion may convict the accused. commission of the alleged offence by the accused.
The accused should plead guilty by his own mouth
and not through his pleader or counsel.Any
admission made by his pleader is not binding on him
If the accused is not acquitted then the Judge calls upon him to
enter on his defence. The accused in his defence may apply for issue
As per Section 226 of the Code requires a public prosecutor to open of any process to compel the attendance of any witness or
his case by describing the charges against the accused and must production any documents. A Judge is required to consider all such
also state the evidence through which the prosecution will prove the application but can also refuse it if the Judge has reasons to believe
guilt of the accused. that such application is vexatious or is made for the purpose of
defeating the ends of justice.
Where the accused refuses or does not plead guilty,
the Court is required to fix a date for the
examination of witnesses. And on such date, the
An accused may be discharged at the initial stage of a sessions’ trial. Court shall take the evidence which may be A Court after hearing the arguments shall pronounce the judgment
Section 227 empowers the Judge to discharge an accused if after produced by the prosecution. A witness will be under Section 235 of the Code. An accused may be either
consideration of the documents and records submitted against the
accused and after hearing the prosecution and accused, the judge examined orally. A judge under Section 231 (2) may acquitted or convicted. The acquittal will be done as per the
procedure embodied under Section 232 but the judgment for
finds that there is no sufficient ground to proceed against the defer the cross-examination of any witness and may conviction will be pronounced in accordance with Section 235. A
accused. The section aims to ensure that a person is not harassed also recall any witness for further cross-examination. judge shall pass the sentence of conviction according to law.
unnecessarily by the means an unnecessary prolonged criminal trial.
Section 238: Section 239: When Section 240: Framing of Section 241: Section 242: Evidence Section 243: Evidence Argument: After Judgement: The trial
Compliance with Accused will be Issues: If during the Conviction of plea of for Prosecution: After of Defence: When the closing of the ends either in
Section 207: When a discharged: After hearing of the guilty: If the accused hearing the charges prosecution closes his evidence any party to conviction or acquittal
warrant case is considering the police prosecution charge pleads guilty, than the from the magistrate, if case after examining the proceeding may of the accused. It is
instituted by the police report and hearing the and looking at the magistrate may the accused pleads the witnesses, it’s produce a concise decided by the court
report, and the prosecution charges, if police report, if the convict him thereon. not guilty, than the defence turn. oral argument. with reasons stated in
accused has the magistrate magistrate is of the magistrate shall fix the In this case the the “Judgement”
appeared before the considers the charge opinion that there are date for examination accused defence has
magistrate, the to be groundless, he grounds for the of witnesses. the opportunity to
magistrate shall satisfy shall discharge the charges, he shall In case of a criminal “Cross Examination” of
himself for the accused. frame in writing the case, the state witnesses who were
compliance of Section charges against the presents it’s case first. examined by the
207. (Section 207 accused. He shall read Burden of proving the prosecution in
basically expect the those charges to the guilt is on the “examination in chief”.
police to provide the accused and ask prosecution.
accused a free copy whether he pleads Defence can produce
of police report, guilty of the offence Prosecution can call both oral and written
evidence details etc.) OR should be tried. upon witnesses to documentary
prove the offence. evidence.
The process of proving
guilt by witnesses, is
called “Examination –
in – chief”
Section 244: Evidence for prosecution: Section 245: When Accused will be Section 246: Procedure where accused Section 247: Evidence for defence: The
When in any warrant case instituted discharged: After hearing the is not discharged: Magistrate shall accused shall then be called upon to
otherwise than a police report, the prosecution charges, if the magistrate frame in writing the charges against enter upon his defence and produce
accused appears or is brought before considers the charge to be groundless, the accused. He shall read those his evidence; and the provisions of
the magistrate and magistrate will hear he shall discharge the accused. charges to the accused and ask Section 243 shall apply to this case.
the prosecution with evidences. whether he pleads guilty of the offence
The Magistrate on application of OR should be tried.
prosecution, issue a summon to any of If the accused pleads guilty, than the
its witnesses asking him to attend or magistrate may convict him thereon.
produce documents. After hearing the charges from the
magistrate, if the accused pleads not
guilty, than the magistrate shall fix the
date for examination of witnesses.
Examination in chief will happen by the
prosecution
253.
Section 260 to 265 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) deals with the provisions related to summary trials.
- Section 260 of the Code confers any Chief Judicial Magistrate,Metropolitan Magistrate and Magistrate of the first class with the power to try trial summarily.
- Section 261, any High Court may empower any Magistrate of the second class to try summarily any offence punishable only with fine or with imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6
months with or without fine and any attempt or abetment of such offences
6. The charge:
• Form of charges
• Joinder of charges
Particulars of the
way in which the
Accused person’s Details of Time, offence was
previous Place and Person committed
Substantive
convictions: (Section 212) : It is (Section 213): In
requirements of
Charge’s Charge might crucial for a cases where the
offense to be
Defining and language: It is to state the fact, charge to information
Describing the Mentioning the complied with: Thing in respect
understanding be noted that date, and place contain the time above is not
Stating the offence by the law and section The charge must of which offense
the offense: In one of the basic of the previous when offense sufficient to give
Offence: The name: Along with of law: The fulfil the is committed: It is
places where the essentials of conviction in happened, place notice of the
offense must be the charge the charge must requirements of important for a
criminal law has charge is that the places where the where offense offense with
expressed, in a name of the contain the law the offense, charge to express
not named the charge should be accused is liable was committed, which the
charge sheet so offence, related or the section of whether there the property in
offence then a framed in English to enhanced person against alleged accused
that the accused to such charge the law against are any respect of which
definition/ or the Court’s punishment by whom the has been
may shield must be clearly which the offense exceptions are the offence is
meaning of the language or the virtue of his offense was charged, then it is
himself. defined and has been said to there or not and if said to have
offense must be language which previous committed and expected that
explained. be committed. there are then taken place.
expressed. is understandable conviction and any other object the charge shall
the charge
by an accused. where such or thing against include the
should adhere to
previous whom the particulars of the
them.
conviction has to offense was manner in which
be proved. committed. the alleged
offense was
committed.
Offences of criminal
breach of trust or
Where it is doubtful what
misappropriation of
offence in the alternatives:
Three offences of same property connected with Same acts constituting
kind within one year: Offences in course of falsification of accounts: one and also different If it is doubtful on facts
same transaction: offences: proved which of several
In cases where the person A person may be Same act constituting offences has been
Desire of accused: is accused of more In situations where one charged with and tried at In cases where an act
different offences: committed; then in that
In cases where the offences than one of the series of acts so one trial for every such constitutes of one or more case, the accused may be
A person may be
accused himself wants a same kind committed connected together form offence, in cases where than one offences, and charged with one of such
charged with and tried at
joint trial and the within one year, then the same transaction, he has committed one or also constitutes a different offences or with several
one trial only for every
magistrate is satisfied that regardless of the fact that and more offences than more offences of criminal offence when combined, offences in the alternatives.
such offence where the If in such a case, the
such joint trial will not the crime has been one are committed by breach of trust or there may be joinder that
alleged acts constitute an accused is charged with
prejudice the accused, committed with respect the same person, then in dishonest is the person accused of
offence within two or one offence however if it
joint trial is allowed to be to the same person or such cases he may be misappropriation of them may be charged
more separate definitions appears on evidence that
carried. not, he may be charged charged with and tried at property and is accused with and tried at one trial
under the law. he has committed a
with and tried at one trial one trial for every such of committing falsification for individual offences as
for any number of them offence. of accounts or the well as the combined different offence for which
he might have been
not exceeding three. purpose of facilitating or offence.
charged, he can be
concealing the convicted of that offence.
commission of such
offence.
Powers of Police
Powers of Police to
Powers of Police to Arrest Power of Preventive Arrest
Investigate
The Investigation of Police starts when; - Police have the power to arrest the persons as - The preventive arrest is the detaining of a person who is
- When someone lodges an FIR (First Information Report) likely to commit an offense. It is a highly debated topic
- When a Police officer suspects commission of a cognizable well.
- The Police can make the arrests for both all over the world.
offense
- In India, Section 107 and Section 151 of CrPC give the
- Whenever a competent magistrate orders the Police Cognizable as well as Non-cognizable offenses. powers of Police for preventive detention mainly.
The Police have the power to investigate Cognizable as well as - For non-cognizable offenses, a Police officer has - In case an Executive Magistrate receives information
Non-Cognizable offenses. no authority to arrest a person without warrant. that a person is likely to commit a breach of peace, he
- Police officers can investigate Cognizable offenses without the However, a Police officer can arrest a person may order him to show cause. The magistrate may also
magistrate’s orders. If a Police officer suspects the commission of
a cognizable offense, he has the power to investigate under without a warrant for Cognizable offenses. order him to execute a bond to keep peace in such
Section 157 without the filing of FIR. - In case of adequate grounds, the magistrate period.
- Police also have the power to require the presence of witnesses may extend the period of detention to 15 days. - It is the duty of the Police to prevent Cognizable
in order to pursue an investigation. Males under 15 years and offenses. Also, the Police have the power to arrest a
over 60 years of age, females, or mentally/physically disabled - Also, the Police have the power to release the person without a warrant or an order from the
persons shall not be required to attend as a witness except for accused in case of lack of evidence magistrate in cases they have knowledge that such
their residences. Police can examine these witnesses as well.
person is planning to commit a cognizable offense.
- Police also has the power to conduct a medical examination of
rape victims
- When an information is received by a police - The police officer on information about a - After receiving the information about
officer regarding a non-cognizable case / cognizable offence / case, shall start the the offence, he finds there is reason to
offence, he shall enter it in the register of investigation without the order of Magistrate
commission an investigation, he shall do
police station and refer the information to - No questions will be raised on the police officer
the magistrate regarding his empowerment to do so, that.
- Police officer cannot investigate / put a case considering it’s a cognizable offence - He shall then send a report of the same
to trial without the order of the magistrate - Any Magistrate may order an investigation (if to the Magistrate
- Once the order is received, the police officer the complaint hasn’t come through police) - Magistrate based on the police report
shall do the investigation in similar fashion as and investigation, may take measures
done in case of a cognizable offence
for the discovery and arrest of the
- If the case relates to two or more than two
offences, and one of them happen to be offender
non-cognizable…the case shall be deemed - If the police officer doesn’t find a reason
as a cognizable case. to commission an investigation, he shall
inform the magistrate and investigation
won’t be conducted.
Procedure when
Recording of confessions investigation cannot be Examination of Witnesses by
and statements (Section 164) completed within 24 hours Police (Section 161)
(Section 167)
- Any Metropolitan magistrate or Judicial - If the investigation procedure is not - Any police officer making an
magistrate (even outside his jurisdiction) completed by police within 24 hrs, the investigation may examine orally any
may record any confession or statement police officer in charge shall forward the person supposed to be acquainted with
made to him in the course of investigation
accused to such Magistrate the facts of the case.
- Magistrate has to explain to the person that
this confession/statement may be used as
- The Magistrate may authorize the - Such person shall be bound to answer
an evidence. Hence, he should be doing it detention of the accused in such truly all such case related questions.
voluntarily without any influence of anyone custody for a term not exceeding 15 - Police officer may reduce into writing
- The person will be signing this statement / days in the whole (it can be in parts) any statement made to him
confession and Magistrate will make a - Magistrate authorizing the custody shall - As per Section 162, none of these
memorandum at the footer of the record reasons for doing so statements need to be signed by the
statement and sign it. - Magistrate shall forward a copy of the person being questioned
- Magistrate has the power to put the person
detention order to Chief Judicial
on oath (if he wishes to do so)
Magistrate
Section 372: No appeal to lie unless Stipulates that appeal shall only lie from the lower court to the upper court ONLY if it is provided for
otherwise provided in the code.
Section 374: Appeal from Convictions Appeals from higher court convictions. It stipulates that the appeal shall lie from high court to
supreme court for convictions. An appeal can also lie from the court of sessions to High court for a
conviction that is more than 7 years.
Section 375: No Appeal in certain cases Stipulates that no appeal shall be entertained in case where the accused plead guilty except if it is
when the accused pleads guilty related to the extent of conviction and sentence
Section 376: No Appeal in petty cases No appeal for petty cases. Petty cases are treated as simple offences or misdemeanor.
Section 377: Appeal by the state Appeal by the state government on the sentence or conviction that bothers on the ground of
government against sentence inadequacy.
Section 378: Appeal in case of Acquittal Covers appeal in cases of acquittal. In such instances, the cases can only be entertained or heard
with the leave of the court.
Section 379: Appeal against conviction Provides for an appeal against the sentence or conviction of the high court in cases such as:
by High court in certain cases - Life imprisonment
- Imprisonment for 10 years or more
- Death Sentence
Section 397: Calling for The court has the power to call for records of proceedings of its court or
records to exercise powers of any inferior court.
revision
Section 398: Power to order Upon examining the records of proceedings, the judge has the right to
inquiry order for an inquiry into the decision of the case
Section 399: Sessions Judge’s The session judge have the power to revise a decision and he/she can
power of revision call the additional session judges for the revision of the decision
Section 400: Power of
Additional Sessions Judge
Section 401: High Court’s The high court has the power to revise the cases before it or before the
powers of revision inferior or lower courts
Section 402: Power of high The high court also has the power to transfer or withdraw the revision
court to withdraw or transfer cases before it.
revision cases
Created By: www.jurisknowledge.com
52
JurisKnowledge
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN APPEAL, REFERENCES, REVISION