Sie sind auf Seite 1von 24

Case 4:19-cv-00105-DN Document 2 Filed 12/20/19 Page 1 of 23

GURR BRANDE & SPENDLOVE, PLLC


ROBERT A. GURR (Utah Bar No. 13722)
rob@gbsip.com
JARED G. BRANDE (Utah Bar No. 11514)
jared@gbsip.com
ROBERT D. SPENDLOVE (Utah Bar No. 15924)
spendlove@gbsip.com
491 E. Riverside Dr., #4B
St. George, UT 84790
Phone: (435) 634-8868
Fax: (866)-232-8818

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


DISTRICT OF UTAH

SQUATTY POTTY, LLC,


Case No. _____________________
Plaintiff,

v. COMPLAINT

XUZHOU MALLBOO NETWORK


TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., a Chinese
limited liability company, DOES I-X, and JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
ROES I-X

Defendants.

Plaintiff, Squatty Potty, LLC, by and through its counsel, Gurr Brande & Spendlove,

PLLC, hereby brings this Complaint against the Defendants, Xuzhou MallBoo Network

Technology Co., Ltd., DOES I-X, and ROES I-X, and alleges as follows:

THE PARTIES

1. Plaintiff, Squatty Potty, LLC, is an active Delaware Limited Liability Company

with its principal place of business at 1664 S. Dixie Dr., Ste. G-102, Saint George, Utah 84770.

Page 1 of 23
Case 4:19-cv-00105-DN Document 2 Filed 12/20/19 Page 2 of 23

2. Defendant Xuzhou MallBoo Network Technology Co., Ltd., (hereafter

“MallBoo”) is a Chinese limited liability company with a business address of No. 2, East Third

Ring Road, Jinshan Bridge Development Zone, Xuzhou, China 221000.

3. DOES I-X are individuals, who are yet to be discovered whose rights and interests

may be affected herein or who may be liable for the damages set forth herein. Plaintiff reserves

the right to amend its Complaint to name DOES I-X as they are discovered.

4. ROES I-X are legal entities (corporations, limited liability companies, trusts, etc.),

who are yet to be discovered and whose rights and interests may be affected herein or who may

be liable for the damages set forth herein. Plaintiff reserves the right to amend its Complaint to

name ROES I-X as they are discovered.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

5. Squatty Potty, LLC (“Plaintiff”), files this design and utility patent infringement

under the patent laws of the United States; for trademark infringement under the trademark laws

of the United States; and for related claims of unfair competition and trade practices under

federal laws and the laws of the state of Utah. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the

patent claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a), over the trademark infringement claims under 15

U.S.C. § 1121, over the unfair trade practices and unfair competition claims under 28 U.S.C. §§

1331 and 1338(b), and over the remaining claims under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1338(b) and 1367(a). The

Court also has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1332(a).

6. This Court has personal jurisdiction over MallBoo because MallBoo conducts

business throughout the United States and has conducted business within the District of Utah.

7. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and (c).

Page 2 of 23
Case 4:19-cv-00105-DN Document 2 Filed 12/20/19 Page 3 of 23

GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

8. Plaintiff is also the owner, by virtue of assignment, of the entire right, title, and

interest in and to U.S. Design Patent D766,604, entitled “Adjustable Toilet Footrest,” which was

filed on March 23, 2016 and granted on September 20, 2016 (hereafter the “‘604 Patent”). (See

Exhibit A).

9. Plaintiff is the owner, by virtue of assignment, of the entire right, title, and interest

in and to U.S. Utility Patent 9,895,036, entitled “Adjustable Toilet Footrest and Method of Use,”

which was filed on May 15, 2015 and granted on February 20, 2018 (hereafter the “‘036

Patent”). (See Exhibit B).

10. Plaintiff is also the owner of three design patents in the United States, each

entitled “Flippable Toilet Footrest”: D840,166 (hereafter the “‘166 Patent”), granted February

12, 2019; D840,167 (hereafter the “‘167 Patent”), granted February 12, 2019; and D842,618

(hereafter the “‘618 Patent”), granted March 12, 2019. The patent certificates for each of these

design patents for the Flippable Toilet Footrest are attached hereto as Exhibit C.

11. Plaintiff has also filed a utility patent application for the Flippable Toilet Footrest

(Application No. 16/198,534), which was published on May 23, 2019 (See Exhibit D).

12. Plaintiff has invested substantial time and resources into developing its product

line of toilet stools and associated goods.

13. Plaintiff’s Adjustable Toilet Footrest (the subject of the ‘036 and ‘604 Patents)

incorporates various ornamental features as shown in the figures accompanying the ‘604 Patent.

Page 3 of 23
Case 4:19-cv-00105-DN Document 2 Filed 12/20/19 Page 4 of 23

14. Plaintiff’s Flippable Toilet Footrest (the subject of the ‘166, ‘167, and ‘618

Patents) incorporates various ornamental features as shown in the figures accompanying the

‘166, ‘167, and ‘618 Patents.

15. Plaintiff is also the owner of a stylized trademark registered with the United

States Patent and Trademark Office (Registration No. 4354138). The mark consists of a stylized

representation of a person sitting on the toilet with his feet resting on a toilet foot stool in front of

him to put him into a 35-degree angle (hereafter the “Trademark”). (See Exhibit E)

16. Plaintiff’s Trademark was registered on June 18, 2013.

17. Plaintiff became aware that MallBoo was selling on Amazon.com a toilet stool

described as an “Adjustable Bamboo Squatting Toilet Stool,” (hereafter referred to as the

“MallBoo Adjustable Stool”).

18. The MallBoo Adjustable Stool carries an Amazon Standard Number

Identification (“ASIN”) of B076GXN3HL.

19. The link to the webpage where MallBoo sells the MallBoo Adjustable Stool is:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B076GXN3HL/ref=dp_cerb_3. A screenshot of the listing is

below:

Page 4 of 23
Case 4:19-cv-00105-DN Document 2 Filed 12/20/19 Page 5 of 23

20. MallBoo uses the following image in connection with its Amazon listing for the

MallBoo Adjustable Stool:

21. Plaintiff’s counsel reached out to MallBoo through the messaging platform on

Amazon.com and advised the latter that the MallBoo Adjustable Stool infringes the ‘604 Patent

and the Trademark.

22. MallBoo never responded to Plaintiff’s counsel and continued to sell the

infringing MallBoo Adjustable Stool and to use the Trademark without authorization from

Plaintiff.

23. Plaintiff recently became aware that MallBoo has also been selling on

Amazon.com a toilet stool described as “MallBoo Bamboo Squatting Toilet Stool with Flip

Adjustment” (hereafter referred to as the MallBoo Flip Stool”).

24. The ASIN for the MallBoo Flip Stool is B07SLY64XD and could be purchased

using the following link: https://www.amazon.com/MallBoo-Bamboo-Squatting-Toilet-

Adjustment/dp/B07SLY64XD. A screenshot of the listing is attached below:

Page 5 of 23
Case 4:19-cv-00105-DN Document 2 Filed 12/20/19 Page 6 of 23

25. MallBoo also uses a colorable imitation of the Trademark in connection with the

sale of the MallBoo Flip Stool.

First Cause of Action


(Direct Infringement of the ‘604 Patent by MallBoo)

26. Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in

paragraphs 1 through 25 above, as though fully set forth herein.

27. Plaintiff is the owner of the ‘604 Patent, which is valid and enforceable.

28. MallBoo has infringed, induced others to infringe, and/or contributed to the

infringement of the ‘604 Patent, and continues to do so by manufacturing, using, offering to sell,

selling within, and importing into the United States, without permission from Plaintiff to do so,

products covered by the ‘604 Patent, including but not limited to the MallBoo Adjustable Stool,

in violation of and 35 U.S.C. 289.

29. A side-by-side comparison of figures from the ‘604 Patent (left) and photos of the

MallBoo Adjustable Stool from Amazon.com (right) are reproduced below:

Page 6 of 23
Case 4:19-cv-00105-DN Document 2 Filed 12/20/19 Page 7 of 23

30. An ordinary observer, given such attention as a purchaser usually gives, would be

deceived by the substantial similarity between the design of the MallBoo Adjustable Stool and

the patented design in the ‘604 Patent.

31. Despite being notified of the ‘604 Patent, MallBoo has refused to cease its

infringing activities.

32. MallBoo was aware of the ‘604 Patent at least as early as November 7, 2017.

33. MallBoo’s deliberate and willful actions in infringing the design of Plaintiff’s

‘604 Patent, have caused, and will continue to cause, irreparable harm to Plaintiff unless

permanently enjoined pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §283.

Page 7 of 23
Case 4:19-cv-00105-DN Document 2 Filed 12/20/19 Page 8 of 23

34. MallBoo has also profited from, and continues to profit from, its infringing stool.

35. Plaintiff has suffered pecuniary damages in amounts to be determined at trial as a

result of MallBoo’s willful infringement of the ‘604 patent, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§284 and

289.

36. MallBoo’s wrongful, malicious, fraudulent, deliberate, willful, and/or intentional

conduct makes this an exceptional case entitling Plaintiff to an award of attorney’s fees and

costs.

Second Cause of Action


(Direct Infringement of the ‘036 Patent by MallBoo)

37. Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in

paragraphs 1 through 36 above, as though fully set forth herein.

38. Plaintiff is the owner of the entire right, title, and interest in the ‘036 Patent.

39. MallBoo has and continues to manufacture, use, import, distribute, offer to sell,

and/or sell in the United States the MallBoo Adjustable Stool that infringes the ‘036 Patent.

Specifically, the MallBoo Adjustable Stool product infringes at least claim 1 of the ‘036 Patent

literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents. The MallBoo Adjustable Stool product

infringes claim 1 of the ’036 Patent at least because the MallBoo Adjustable Stool product

includes each and every limitation of claim 1.

40. MallBoo was aware of the ‘036 Patent at least as early as June 27, 2018.

41. MallBoo infringes and will continue to infringe the claim of the ‘036 Patent by

making, using, importing, offering to sell, and/or selling within the United States the MallBoo

Adjustable Stool product.

42. MallBoo’s infringement of the ‘036 Patent is willful.

Page 8 of 23
Case 4:19-cv-00105-DN Document 2 Filed 12/20/19 Page 9 of 23

43. MallBoo is, and will continue to be, damaged and irreparably harmed by

MallBoo’s infringement, which will continue unless MallBoo is enjoined by this Court.

Third Cause of Action


(Direct Infringement of the ‘167 Patent by MallBoo)

44. Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in

paragraphs 1 through 43 above, as though fully set forth herein.

45. Plaintiff is the owner of the ‘167 Patent, which is valid and enforceable.

46. MallBoo has infringed, induced others to infringe, and/or contributed to the

infringement of the ‘167 Patent, and continues to do so by manufacturing, using, offering to sell,

selling within, and importing into the United States, without permission from Plaintiff to do so,

products covered by the ‘167 Patent, including but not limited to the MallBoo Flip Stool, in

violation of 35 U.S.C. §271(a) and 35 U.S.C. 289.

47. A side-by-side comparison of figures from the ‘167 Patent (left) and photos of the

MallBoo Flip Stool from Amazon.com (right) are reproduced below:

Page 9 of 23
Case 4:19-cv-00105-DN Document 2 Filed 12/20/19 Page 10 of 23

48. An ordinary observer, given such attention as a purchaser usually gives, would be

deceived by the substantial similarity between the design of the MallBoo Flip Stool and the

patented design in the ‘167 Patent.

49. MallBoo has been aware of the ‘167 Patent.

50. MallBoo’s deliberate and willful actions in infringing the design of Plaintiff’s

‘167 Patent, have caused, and will continue to cause, irreparable harm to Plaintiff unless

permanently enjoined pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §283.

51. MallBoo has also profited from, and continue to profit from, its infringing stool.

52. Plaintiff has suffered pecuniary damages in amounts to be determined at trial as a

result of MallBoo’s willful infringement of the ‘167 patent, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§284 and

289.

53. MallBoo’s wrongful, malicious, fraudulent, deliberate, willful, and/or intentional

conduct makes this an exceptional case entitling Plaintiff to an award of attorney’s fees and

costs.

Fourth Cause of Action


(Direct Infringement of the ‘166 Patent by MallBoo)

54. Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in

paragraphs 1 through 53 above, as though fully set forth herein.

55. Plaintiff is the owner of the ‘166 Patent, which is valid and enforceable.

56. MallBoo has infringed, induced others to infringe, and/or contributed to the

infringement of the ‘166 Patent, and continues to do so by manufacturing, using, offering to sell,

selling within, and importing into the United States, without permission from Plaintiff to do so,

Page 10 of 23
Case 4:19-cv-00105-DN Document 2 Filed 12/20/19 Page 11 of 23

products covered by the ‘166 Patent, including but not limited to the MallBoo Flip Stool, in

violation of 35 U.S.C. §271(a) and 35 U.S.C. 289.

57. A side-by-side comparison of figures from the ‘166 Patent (left) and photos of the

MallBoo Flip Stool from Amazon.com (right) are reproduced below:

58. An ordinary observer, given such attention as a purchaser usually gives, would be

deceived by the substantial similarity between the design of the MallBoo Flip Stool and the

patented design in the ‘166 Patent.

59. MallBoo has been aware of the ‘166 Patent.

Page 11 of 23
Case 4:19-cv-00105-DN Document 2 Filed 12/20/19 Page 12 of 23

60. MallBoo’s deliberate and willful actions in infringing the design of Plaintiff’s

‘166 Patent, have caused, and will continue to cause, irreparable harm to Plaintiff unless

permanently enjoined pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §283.

61. MallBoo has also profited from, and continue to profit from, its infringing stool.

62. Plaintiff has suffered pecuniary damages in amounts to be determined at trial as a

result of MallBoo’s willful infringement of the ‘166 patent, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§284 and

289.

63. MallBoo’s wrongful, malicious, fraudulent, deliberate, willful, and/or intentional

conduct makes this an exceptional case entitling Plaintiff to an award of attorney’s fees and

costs.

Fifth Cause of Action


(Direct Infringement of the ‘618 Patent by MallBoo)

64. Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in

paragraphs 1 through 63 above, as though fully set forth herein.

65. Plaintiff is the owner of the ‘618 Patent, which is valid and enforceable.

66. MallBoo has infringed, induced others to infringe, and/or contributed to the

infringement of the ‘618 Patent, and continues to do so by manufacturing, using, offering to sell,

selling within, and importing into the United States, without permission from Plaintiff to do so,

products covered by the ‘618 Patent, including but not limited to the MallBoo Flip Stool, in

violation of 35 U.S.C. §271(a) and 35 U.S.C. 289.

67. A side-by-side comparison of figures from the ‘618 Patent (left) and photos of the

MallBoo Flip Stool from Amazon.com (right) are reproduced below:

Page 12 of 23
Case 4:19-cv-00105-DN Document 2 Filed 12/20/19 Page 13 of 23

68. An ordinary observer, given such attention as a purchaser usually gives, would be

deceived by the substantial similarity between the design of the MallBoo Flip Stool and the

patented design in the ‘618 Patent.

69. MallBoo has been aware of the ‘618 Patent.

70. MallBoo’s deliberate and willful actions in infringing the design of Plaintiff’s

‘618 Patent, have caused, and will continue to cause, irreparable harm to Plaintiff unless

permanently enjoined pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §283.

Page 13 of 23
Case 4:19-cv-00105-DN Document 2 Filed 12/20/19 Page 14 of 23

71. MallBoo has also profited from, and continue to profit from, its infringing stool.

72. Plaintiff has suffered pecuniary damages in amounts to be determined at trial as a

result of MallBoo’s willful infringement of the ‘618 patent, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§284 and

289.

73. MallBoo’s wrongful, malicious, fraudulent, deliberate, willful, and/or intentional

conduct makes this an exceptional case entitling Plaintiff to an award of attorney’s fees and

costs.

Sixth Cause of Action


(Trademark Infringement - 15 U.S.C. 1114)

74. Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in

paragraphs 1 through 73 above, as though fully set forth herein.

75. MallBoo has been selling the MallBoo Adjustable Stool and MallBoo Flip Stool

on Amazon.com.

76. On MallBoo’s Amazon.com listing is a representation of a person sitting on a

toilet with his feet resting on a toilet foot stool in front of him to put him into a 35-degree angle.

A screenshot of the representation is below:

77. The representation on MallBoo’s Amazon.com listing is nearly identical to

Plaintiff’s Trademark.

78. MallBoo does not have Plaintiff’s consent to use the Trademark.

Page 14 of 23
Case 4:19-cv-00105-DN Document 2 Filed 12/20/19 Page 15 of 23

79. MallBoo’s use of a representation of a person sitting on the toilet with his feet

resting on a toilet foot stool in front of him to put him into a 35-degree angle is a violation of 15

U.S.C. 1114(1)(a) in that MallBoo has, without the consent of Plaintiff, used in commerce a

reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of the Trademark in connection with the

sale, offering for sale, distribution, or advertising of goods and services provided by MallBoo.

MallBoo has used the imitation in such a manner as is likely to cause confusion, mistake, or to

deceive.

80. MallBoo’s use of a representation of a person sitting on the toilet with his feet

resting on a toilet foot stool in front of him to put him into a 35-degree angle is a violation of 15

U.S.C. 1114(1)(b) in that the MallBoo has, without the consent of Plaintiff, used in commerce a

reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of the Trademark and applied such

reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation to advertisements intended to be used in

commerce in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution, or advertising of goods and

services provided by MallBoo. MallBoo has used the imitation in such a manner as is likely to

cause confusion, mistake, or to deceive.

81. MallBoo’s use of an imitation of the Trademark is committed with knowledge

that the imitation was intended to be used to cause confusion, mistake, or to deceive.

82. Plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief under 15 U.S.C 1116 and recovery of

damages from MallBoo pursuant to 15 U.S.C 1117. Damages recoverable are three times the

actual damages sustained by Plaintiff, MallBoo’s profits, and the costs of the action, together

with Plaintiff’s attorney fees, or in the alternative, damages in such sum as the Court may find to

be just according to the circumstances of the case.

Page 15 of 23
Case 4:19-cv-00105-DN Document 2 Filed 12/20/19 Page 16 of 23

Seventh Cause of Action


(Trademark Infringement - 15 U.S.C. 1125(a))

83. Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in

paragraphs 1 through 82 above, as though fully set forth herein.

84. MallBoo has intentionally violated 15 U.S.C. 1125(a) in that it has, on or in

connection with MallBoo’s goods or services, used an imitation of the Trademark which

represents a false designation of origin, false or misleading description, and/or a

misrepresentation of fact likely to cause confusion, mistake, or deceive as to the affiliation,

connection, or association of MallBoo with Plaintiff or which is likely to cause confusion,

mistake or deceive as to whether Plaintiff has anything to do with the origin, sponsorship, or

approval of the goods, services, or commercial activities of MallBoo.

85. MallBoo has similarly violated 15 U.S.C. 1125(a) intentionally in that their

commercial advertising or promotion using an imitation of the Trademark misrepresents the

nature, characteristics, qualities, and/or geographic origin of their goods, services, or commercial

activities.

86. Plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief under 15 U.S.C. 1116 and recovery of

damages from MallBoo, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117. Damages include, the actual damages

sustained by the Plaintiff, MallBoo’s profits, and the costs of the action together with Plaintiff’s

reasonable attorney fees. In the alternative, Plaintiff is entitled to recover damages in such sums

as the Court may find just according to the circumstances of the case.

Eighth Cause of Action


(Trademark Infringement - 15 U.S.C. 1125(c))

Page 16 of 23
Case 4:19-cv-00105-DN Document 2 Filed 12/20/19 Page 17 of 23

87. Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in

paragraphs 1 through 86 above, as though fully set forth herein.

88. MallBoo’s use of an imitation of the Trademark has caused and continues to

cause dilution of the distinctive quality of the Trademark. MallBoo’s use of an imitation of the

Trademark is a violation of 15 U.S.C. 1125(c), Plaintiff’s mark being distinctive and famous

within the meaning of the statute and MallBoo’s use of and imitation of the Trademark in

commerce having begun after the Trademark became distinctive and famous.

89. MallBoo willfully intended to trade on Plaintiff’s reputation and/or cause dilution

of the Trademark by their use of an imitation of the Trademark.

90. Plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief under 15 U.S.C. 1116 and recovery of

damages from MallBoo, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117(a). Damages recoverable are actual

damages sustained by the Plaintiff, MallBoo’s profits, and the costs of the action together with

Plaintiff’s reasonable attorney fees. In the alternative, Plaintiff is entitled to recover damages in

such sum as the Court may find just according to the circumstances of the case.

Ninth Cause of Action


(Unfair Competition – Utah Code Ann. § 13-5a-102)

91. Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in

paragraphs 1 through 90 above, as though fully set forth herein.

92. MallBoo has engaged in unfair competition by intentionally using the Trademark

to trade on Plaintiff’s long-standing and hard-earned goodwill in its name and marks, as well as

in order to confuse consumers as to the origin and sponsorship of MallBoo’s goods and services

and to pass their products and services off as those of Plaintiff.

Page 17 of 23
Case 4:19-cv-00105-DN Document 2 Filed 12/20/19 Page 18 of 23

93. MallBoo’s conduct is likely to cause confusion, mistake or deception as to the

affiliation, connection, or association of MallBoo’s products with Plaintiff, and as to the origin,

sponsorship, or approval of MallBoo and its products.

94. MallBoo had direct and full knowledge of Plaintiff’s prior use of and rights in the

Trademark before the acts complained of herein.

95. MallBoo’s unlawful and unfair conduct has led to a material diminution of the

reputation and goodwill established by Plaintiff in the Trademark.

96. As a result of MallBoo’s aforesaid conduct, Plaintiff has suffered substantial

damages, as well as the continuing loss of the goodwill and reputation established by Plaintiff in

the Trademark. This continuing loss of goodwill cannot be properly calculated and thus

constitutes irreparable harm and an injury for which Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law.

Tenth Cause of Action


(Violation of Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act - Utah Code Ann. § 13-11-4)

97. Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in

paragraphs 1 through 96 above, as though fully set forth herein.

98. MallBoo has falsely and intentionally indicated that its products are affiliated with

or sponsored or approved by Plaintiff, in violation of the Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act,

Utah Code Ann. § 13-11-4(2)(a).

99. MallBoo has falsely and intentionally indicated that MallBoo is affiliated with or

sponsored or approved by Plaintiff, in violation of the Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act, Utah

Code Ann. § 13-11-4(2)(i).

Page 18 of 23
Case 4:19-cv-00105-DN Document 2 Filed 12/20/19 Page 19 of 23

100. MallBoo’s conduct is likely to cause confusion, mistake or deception as to the

affiliation, connection or association of MallBoo and its products with Plaintiff, and as to the

origin, sponsorship or approval of MallBoo and its products.

101. As a result of MallBoo’s aforesaid conduct, Plaintiff has suffered substantial

damages, as well as the continuing loss of the goodwill and reputation established by Plaintiff in

its Trademark. This continuing loss of goodwill cannot be properly calculated and thus

constitutes irreparable harm and an injury for which Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law.

Plaintiff will continue to suffer irreparable harm unless this Court enjoins MallBoo’s conduct.

Eleventh Cause of Action


(Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition - Utah Common Law)

102. Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in

paragraphs 1 through 101 above, as though fully set forth herein.

103. MallBoo has deliberately and willfully attempted to trade on Plaintiff’s

longstanding and hard-earned goodwill in its name and Trademark and the reputation Plaintiff

established in connection with its products, as well as to confuse consumers as to the origin and

sponsorship of MallBoo’s products and to pass its products off as those of Plaintiff.

104. MallBoo’s unauthorized and tortious conduct has also deprived and will continue

to deprive Plaintiff of the ability to control the consumer perception of its products offered under

Plaintiff’s marks, placing the valuable reputation and goodwill of Plaintiff in the hands of

MallBoo.

105. MallBoo’s conduct is likely to cause confusion, mistake or deception as to the

affiliation, connection or association of MallBoo and its products with Plaintiff, and as to the

origin, sponsorship or approval of MallBoo and its products, in violation of Utah common law.

Page 19 of 23
Case 4:19-cv-00105-DN Document 2 Filed 12/20/19 Page 20 of 23

106. As a result of MallBoo’s aforesaid conduct, Plaintiff has suffered substantial

damages, as well as the continuing loss of the goodwill and reputation established by Plaintiff in

the Trademark. This continuing loss of goodwill cannot be properly calculated and thus

constitutes irreparable harm and an injury for which Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law.

Plaintiff will continue to suffer irreparable harm unless this Court enjoins MallBoo’s conduct.

JURY DEMAND

107. Pursuant to Rule 38(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff requests

a jury trial of all issues that may be tried to a jury in this action.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court:

1. Enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against MallBoo on all claims;

2. Enter judgment and preliminarily and permanently enjoin and restrain

MallBoo, its officers, directors, principals, agents, servants, employees, successors and assigns,

and all others aiding, abetting, or acting in concert or active participation therewith, from

making, using, importing, selling or offering for sale, or otherwise distributing any product that

infringes the ‘604, ‘036, ‘167, ‘166, or ‘618 Patents.

3. Order an accounting for Plaintiff’s damages and/or for MallBoo’s profits

derived and/or related to MallBoo’s infringement of the ‘604, ‘036, ‘167, ‘166, and ‘618 Patents;

4. Find that MallBoo has violated 15 U.S.C. 1114 and preliminarily and

permanently enjoin and restrain MallBoo, its officers, directors, principals, agents, servants,

employees, successors and assigns, and all others aiding, abetting, or acting in concert or active

participation therewith, from:

Page 20 of 23
Case 4:19-cv-00105-DN Document 2 Filed 12/20/19 Page 21 of 23

a. advertising, marketing, promoting, offering for sale, distributing,

or selling any product that incorporates the Trademark;

b. using the Trademark on or in connection with any of MallBoo’s

goods;

c. using the Trademark or any other copy, reproduction, colorable

imitation, or simulation of the Trademark on or in connection with

MallBoo’s goods;

d. using any trademark, name, logo, design, or source designation of

any kind on or in connection with MallBoo’s goods or services that

is a copy, reproduction, colorable imitation, or simulation of, or

confusingly similar to any of Plaintiff’s trademarks, trade dresses,

names, or logos;

e. using any trademark, name, logo, design, or source designation of

any kind on or in connection with MallBoo’s goods that is likely to

cause confusion, mistake, deception, or public misunderstanding

that such goods or services are produced or provided by Plaintiff,

or are sponsored or authorized by Plaintiff, or are in any way

connected or related to Plaintiff;

f. using any trademark, name, logo, design, or source designation of

any kind on or in connection with MallBoo’s goods that dilutes or

is likely to dilute the distinctiveness of Plaintiff’s trademarks, trade

dresses, names, or logos; and

Page 21 of 23
Case 4:19-cv-00105-DN Document 2 Filed 12/20/19 Page 22 of 23

g. passing off, palming off, or assisting in passing off or palming off

MallBoo’s goods as those of Plaintiff.

5. Award Plaintiff damages from MallBoo, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117(a)-

(c), consisting of MallBoo’s profits, any damages sustained by Plaintiff and the cost of the

action; said amount to be trebled; that the court award Plaintiff its attorney fees; that the court in

the alternative award damages in such amount as the court in its discretion shall find to be just.

6. That the court find that MallBoo has violated 15 U.S.C. 1125(a) and grant

Plaintiff preliminary and permanent injunctive relief together with damages, pursuant to 15

U.S.C. 1117(a)-(c) consisting of MallBoo’s profits, any damages sustained by Plaintiff and the

cost of the action; said amount to be trebled; that the court award Plaintiff its attorney fees; that

the court in the alternative award damages in such amount as the court in its discretion shall find

to be just.

7. That the court find that MallBoo has violated 15 U.S.C. 1125 (c) and grant

Plaintiff preliminary and permanent injunctive relief together with damages, pursuant to 15

U.S.C. 1117(a)-(c) consisting of MallBoo’s profits, any damages sustained by Plaintiff and the

cost of the action; said amount to be trebled; that the court award Plaintiff its attorney fees; that

the court in the alternative award damages in such amount as the court in its discretion shall find

to be just.

8. Order an assessment of interest and costs against MallBoo;

9. Find this to be an exceptional case and to award reasonable attorneys’ fees

and costs to Plaintiff;

Page 22 of 23
Case 4:19-cv-00105-DN Document 2 Filed 12/20/19 Page 23 of 23

10. Based on MallBoo’s (i) willful and deliberate infringement of the

Plaintiff’s patents and (ii) willful and deliberate infringement and/or dilution of the Trademark,

and to deter such conduct in the future, award Plaintiff punitive damages;

11. Award Plaintiff prejudgment and post-judgment interest on all monetary

awards; and

12. Award Plaintiff such other relief as the Court deems just and proper.

DATED this 19th day of December, 2019.

GURR BRANDE & SPENDLOVE, PLLC

/s/ JARED G. BRANDE


________________________________________
ROBERT A. GURR (Utah Bar No. 13722)
JARED G. BRANDE (Utah Bar No. 11514)
ROBERT D. SPENDLOVE (Utah Bar No. 15924)
491 E. Riverside Dr., #4B
St. George, UT 84790
Phone: (435) 634-8889
Fax: (866)-232-8818
rob@gbsip.com
jared@gbsip.com
spendlove@gbsip.com

Page 23 of 23
Case 4:19-cv-00105-DN Document 2-1 Filed 12/20/19 Page 1 of 1
JS 44 (Rev. 08/18) CIVIL COVER SHEET
The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except as
provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the
purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.)

I. (a) PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS


SQUATTY POTTY, LLC XUZHOU MALLBOO NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., a
Chinese limited liability company, DOES I-X, and ROES I-X
(b) County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff WASHINGTON County of Residence of First Listed Defendant CHINA
(EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)
NOTE: IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE LOCATION OF
THE TRACT OF LAND INVOLVED.

(c) Attorneys (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number) Attorneys (If Known)
GURR BRANDE & SPENDLOVE, PLLC
491 E. RIVERSIDE DR. #4B
ST. GEORGE, UT 84790
II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an “X” in One Box Only) III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an “X” in One Box for Plaintiff
(For Diversity Cases Only) and One Box for Defendant)
’ 1 U.S. Government ’ 3 Federal Question PTF DEF PTF DEF
Plaintiff (U.S. Government Not a Party) Citizen of This State ’ 1 ’ 1 Incorporated or Principal Place ’ 4 ’ 4
of Business In This State

’ 2 U.S. Government ’ 4 Diversity Citizen of Another State ’ 2 ’ 2 Incorporated and Principal Place ’ 5 ’ 5
Defendant (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III) of Business In Another State

Citizen or Subject of a ’ 3 ’ 3 Foreign Nation ’ 6 ’ 6


Foreign Country
IV. NATURE OF SUIT (Place an “X” in One Box Only) Click here for: Nature of Suit Code Descriptions.
CONTRACT TORTS FORFEITURE/PENALTY BANKRUPTCY OTHER STATUTES
’ 110 Insurance PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY ’ 625 Drug Related Seizure ’ 422 Appeal 28 USC 158 ’ 375 False Claims Act
’ 120 Marine ’ 310 Airplane ’ 365 Personal Injury - of Property 21 USC 881 ’ 423 Withdrawal ’ 376 Qui Tam (31 USC
’ 130 Miller Act ’ 315 Airplane Product Product Liability ’ 690 Other 28 USC 157 3729(a))
’ 140 Negotiable Instrument Liability ’ 367 Health Care/ ’ 400 State Reapportionment
’ 150 Recovery of Overpayment ’ 320 Assault, Libel & Pharmaceutical PROPERTY RIGHTS ’ 410 Antitrust
& Enforcement of Judgment Slander Personal Injury ’ 820 Copyrights ’ 430 Banks and Banking
’ 151 Medicare Act ’ 330 Federal Employers’ Product Liability ’ 830 Patent ’ 450 Commerce
’ 152 Recovery of Defaulted Liability ’ 368 Asbestos Personal ’ 835 Patent - Abbreviated ’ 460 Deportation
Student Loans ’ 340 Marine Injury Product New Drug Application ’ 470 Racketeer Influenced and
(Excludes Veterans) ’ 345 Marine Product Liability ’ 840 Trademark Corrupt Organizations
’ 153 Recovery of Overpayment Liability PERSONAL PROPERTY LABOR SOCIAL SECURITY ’ 480 Consumer Credit
of Veteran’s Benefits ’ 350 Motor Vehicle ’ 370 Other Fraud ’ 710 Fair Labor Standards ’ 861 HIA (1395ff) ’ 485 Telephone Consumer
’ 160 Stockholders’ Suits ’ 355 Motor Vehicle ’ 371 Truth in Lending Act ’ 862 Black Lung (923) Protection Act
’ 190 Other Contract Product Liability ’ 380 Other Personal ’ 720 Labor/Management ’ 863 DIWC/DIWW (405(g)) ’ 490 Cable/Sat TV
’ 195 Contract Product Liability ’ 360 Other Personal Property Damage Relations ’ 864 SSID Title XVI ’ 850 Securities/Commodities/
’ 196 Franchise Injury ’ 385 Property Damage ’ 740 Railway Labor Act ’ 865 RSI (405(g)) Exchange
’ 362 Personal Injury - Product Liability ’ 751 Family and Medical ’ 890 Other Statutory Actions
Medical Malpractice Leave Act ’ 891 Agricultural Acts
REAL PROPERTY CIVIL RIGHTS PRISONER PETITIONS ’ 790 Other Labor Litigation FEDERAL TAX SUITS ’ 893 Environmental Matters
’ 210 Land Condemnation ’ 440 Other Civil Rights Habeas Corpus: ’ 791 Employee Retirement ’ 870 Taxes (U.S. Plaintiff ’ 895 Freedom of Information
’ 220 Foreclosure ’ 441 Voting ’ 463 Alien Detainee Income Security Act or Defendant) Act
’ 230 Rent Lease & Ejectment ’ 442 Employment ’ 510 Motions to Vacate ’ 871 IRS—Third Party ’ 896 Arbitration
’ 240 Torts to Land ’ 443 Housing/ Sentence 26 USC 7609 ’ 899 Administrative Procedure
’ 245 Tort Product Liability Accommodations ’ 530 General Act/Review or Appeal of
’ 290 All Other Real Property ’ 445 Amer. w/Disabilities - ’ 535 Death Penalty IMMIGRATION Agency Decision
Employment Other: ’ 462 Naturalization Application ’ 950 Constitutionality of
’ 446 Amer. w/Disabilities - ’ 540 Mandamus & Other ’ 465 Other Immigration State Statutes
Other ’ 550 Civil Rights Actions
’ 448 Education ’ 555 Prison Condition
’ 560 Civil Detainee -
Conditions of
Confinement
V. ORIGIN (Place an “X” in One Box Only)
’ 1 Original ’ 2 Removed from ’ 3 Remanded from ’ 4 Reinstated or ’ 5 Transferred from ’ 6 Multidistrict ’ 8 Multidistrict
Proceeding State Court Appellate Court Reopened Another District Litigation - Litigation -
(specify) Transfer Direct File
Cite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing (Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity):
35 USC 271, 289; 15 USC 1114, 1125
VI. CAUSE OF ACTION Brief description of cause:
Defendants are breaching Plaintiff's patents and trademarks
VII. REQUESTED IN ’ CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTION DEMAND $ CHECK YES only if demanded in complaint:
COMPLAINT: UNDER RULE 23, F.R.Cv.P. Inj.Relief & Def's Profits JURY DEMAND: ’ Yes ’ No
VIII. RELATED CASE(S)
(See instructions):
IF ANY JUDGE DOCKET NUMBER
DATE SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD
12/19/2019 /s/ Jared G. Brande
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY

RECEIPT # AMOUNT APPLYING IFP JUDGE MAG. JUDGE

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen