HDM REPORT EVALUATION

GRADING OF REPORT AND PERFORMANCE

REPORT Title:

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

HDM Report
Presentation
Sr. 10% Total
Student Name Registration Number 5%
No. (Marks (15)
(Marks 20)*0.25
100)X0.1
1

Signature of Course Teacher

 RUBRICS FOR FINAL REPORT ON HDM
Name of student: _____________________________________ Registration Numbers: ________________________________________

Sr. Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Marks

Category Marks
No. (25%) (50%) (75%) (100%) Obtained
HDM FINAL REPORT
The introduction The introduction
The introduction
The work appears contains some relevant contains relevant
contains little relevant
sloppy and information about the information about the
(a) Content 15 information about the
unorganized task and need some task and well
task
improvement organized
3.75 7.5 11.25 15
Literature includes Literature includes
less than 20% Literature includes 20- Literature includes 51-
more than 70%
papers from last 5 49% papers from last 5 69% papers from last 5
(b) Literature Survey 30 papers from last 5
years years years
years
7.5 15 22.5 30
Is messy or poorly
designed. Seems Is acceptably attractive Looks really-good in
Looks good in design
Problem time was not taken though it may be a bit sustainable
(c) 15 and objectives.
Specification to complete it. messy. development

5 10 15 20
Information is Information is
gathered from non- Information is Information is
gathered from
electronic or gathered from limited gathered from multiple
Information multiple electronic or
(d) 10 electronic source electronic or non- electronic or electronic
Gathering electronic source and
only electronic source source
cited properly
2.5 5.0 7.5 10
Sr. Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Marks
Category Marks
No. (25%) (50%) (75%) (100%) Obtained
HDM FINAL REPORT
Methodology is Methodology is Methodology is
Methodology not marginally practical reasonably practical practical and highly
(e) Methodology 10 suitable at all and relevant to the and relevant to the relevant to the project
project objectives project objectives objectives
2.5 5.0 7.5 10
Good and reasonable
Detail research gap is
A vague research Some detail research research gap is
Conclusion reached from the
(f) 10 gap is reached gap is reached reached from the
Reached evidence offered
evidence offered
2.5 5.0 7.5 10

Plagiarism more Plagiarism between Plagiarism between Plagiarism less than

Plagiarism of
(g) 10 than 70 % 35-69 % 10-34 % 10 %
Report
2.5 5.0 7.5 10

Total 100

Signature of Faculty member

 RUBRICS FOR PRESENTATION
(Evaluation to be done by Faculty/Audience)
Name of Student: ____________________________________________ Registration No: ______________________________________________
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Marks
Sr. Category Marks
(25%) (50%) (75%) (100%) Obtained
ORAL PRESENTATION
① Hold attention of
① Display minimal ① Consistent use of
① Holds no eye audience with the use of
eye contact with eye contact with
contact with direct eye contact,
audience. audience.
audience. seldom looking at notes.
(a) Delivery 5 ② Speaks with ② Speaks in uneven
② Speaks low ② Speaks with
satisfactory vibration volume with little
volume fluctuation in volume and
of volume infection
emphasis in key points
1.25 2.5 3.75 5

Does not have grasp

of information and Attempts to define Has somewhat clear Demonstrate full
Content /
(b) 10 does not clearly purpose and objectives purpose and objectives knowledge
Organization
define purpose

2.5 5 7.5 10
Demonstrate strong
Shows little or mixed Shows some
Shows no interest in enthusiasm about topic
feelings about the enthusiastic feelings
(c) Enthusiasm 5 topic presented during entire
topic being presented about topic
presentation
1.25 2.5 3.75 5

Signature of Faculty member