Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF ANNEXURES
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CHAPTER – 1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
1.2 BASE YEAR POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT
1.3 EXISTING TRANSPORT SYSTEM
1.4 REVIEW OF EARLIER STUDIES
1.5 NEED OF THE STUDY
1.6 STUDY AREA
1.7 SCOPE OF SERVICES
1.8 COMPOSITION OF THE DRAFT FINAL REPORT
3.1 BACKGROUND
3.2 ROAD NETWORK CHARACTERISTICS
3.3 SPEED AND DELAY CHARACTERISTICS
3.4 CONCLUSIONS
5.1 INTRODUCTION
5.2 PARKING ACCUMULATION
5.3 PARKING DURATION
5.4 PARKING DEMAND AND SUPPLY
5.5 PARKING INDEX
5.6 PARKING TURNOVER
5.7 CONCLUSIONS
8.1 BACKGROUND
8.2 BASE YEAR POPULATION
8.3 FUTURE GROWTH SCENARIO
8.4 EMPLOYMENT DISTRIBUTION
8.5 CONCLUSIONS
9.1 INTRODUCTION
9.2 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS
9.3 TRIP GENERATION
9.4 TRIP DISTRIBUTION
9.5 MODAL SPLIT
9.6 TRIP ASSIGNMENT
9.7 TRANSPORT DEMAND FORECAST
9.8 IDENTIFICATION OF MAJOR TRAVEL CORRIDORS
11.1 NEED
11.2 PROPOSED SCHEMES
11.3 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT MEASURES
11.4 PARKING MEASURES
11.5 NON-MOTORISED TRANSPORT
11.6 IMPLEMENTATION OF PROPOSED SCHEMES
14.1 INTRODUCTION
14.2 ANNUAL CAPITAL COST FUND REQUIREMENT
14.3 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE COSTS
14.4 METRO RIDERSHIP
14.5 ECONOMIC APPRAISAL OF CHANDIGARH METRO PHASE I
14.6 FINANCIAL APPRAISAL
LIST OF TABLES
Table 7.1 List of Traffic Analysis Zones and Household Sample Size
Table 7.2 Distributions of Households According to Size
Table 7.3 Distribution of Households According to Vehicle Ownership
Table 7.4 Distribution of Households by Number of Cars Owned
Table 7.5 Distribution of Households by Number of 2-Wheelers Owned
Table 9.1 Trip Generation Sub-Models for Home Based one-way Work Trips – 2009
Table 9.2 Trip Generation Sub-Models for Home Based one-way Education Trips –
2009
Table 9.3 Trip Generation Sub-Models For Home Based One-Way Other Trips – 2009
Table 9.4 Trip Generation Sub-Models for Home Based One-Way Total Trips – 2009
Table 9.5 Calibrated Gravity Model Parameters
Table 9.6 Types of Roads and Their Capacities
Table 9.7 (A) Free Flow Speeds
Table 9.7 (B) PCU Conversion Factors
Table 9.8 Summary of Transport Demand Forecast for Chandigarh Urban Complex
Table 9.9 Maximum PHPDT by all modes on major Road Corridors
Table 9.10 Maximum Section Loading on Mass Transport System Corridors
Table 9.11 Proposed Mass Transport System Corridors
Table 9.12 Summary of Transport Demand on Metro System – 2014-Full System
Table 9.13 Summary of Transport Demand on Metro System – 2021-Full System
Table 9.14 Summary of Transport Demand on Metro System – 2031-Full System
Table 9.15 Summary of Transport Demand on Metro System – 2041-Full System
Table 9.16 Phasing Of Implementation of Proposed Mass Transport System
Table 9.17 Expected Ridership on Metro System in Two Phases
Table 9.18 Volume/Capacity Ratio on Various Roads in Study Area before and after
Implementation of the Full MTS
Table 11.1 Existing and Projected Traffic at Intersection Proposed for Improvement
Table 11.2 Intersection Improvement Measures
Table 11.3 Proposed Automatic Multilevel Parking
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 11.6 Proposed Underpass along Madhya Marg at Transport Nagar Chowk (Sector-
26)
Figure 11.7 Proposed Underpass at Intersection of Himalaya Marg and Udyog Path
(Sector- 17)
Figure 11.8 Proposed Underpass at Aroma Hotel Intersection
Figure 11.9 Proposed Underpass at Intersection of Dakshin Marg And Himalaya Marg
Figure 11.10 Proposed Underpass at Intersection of Himalaya Marg and Shanti Path
Figure 11.11 Proposed Underpass along Dakshin Marg at Intersection of Dakshin Marg and
Sukhna Path
Figure 11.12 Proposed Junction Improvement at Intersection of Housing Board Chowk
Figure 11.13 Proposed flyover at Intersection of Railway station on Madhya Marg
Figure 11.14 Proposed Underpass along Dakshin Marg at Kishan Bhawan Chowk
Figure 11.15 Proposed Underpass along Dakshin Marg at Intersection of Tribune Chowk
Figure 11.16 Proposed Underpass along Udyog Path at Intersection of Udyog Path and Jan
Marg (Cricket Stadium Rotary)
Figure 11.17 Proposed Geometric Improvements and Traffic Managements Measures at
Intersection of Sarovar Path and Madhya Marg
Figure 11.18 Proposed Geometric Improvements and Traffic Management Measures at
Intersection of Chandi Path and Madhya Marg
Figure 11.19 Proposed Multilevel parking locations
Figure 11.20 Existing and Proposed NMT Tracks
LIST OF ANNEXURES
Annexure 4.1: Classified Traffic Volume Counts at Outer Cordons Road side Origin –
Destination Surveys at Outer Cordons Survey Format
Annexure 4.2 Classified Traffic Volume Counts at Mid-blocks/Screen lines Survey
Format
Annexure 4.3: Classified Turning Movement Counts at Intersections Survey Format
Annexure 4.4: Traffic Composition at Cordon points
Annexure 4.5: Hourly Variation of Traffic at Cordon points
Annexure 4.6: Traffic Composition at Mid Blocks
Annexure 4.7: Hourly Variation of Traffic at Mid Blocks
Annexure 4.8: Traffic Composition at Intersection
Annexure 4.9: Hourly Variation of Traffic at Intersection
Annexure 4.10 Peak Traffic Flows at Intersection
Annexure 4.11 Pedestrian Survey Format
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
0.1.1 The population of Chandigarh Urban Complex (CUC) comprising Chandigarh, Mohali
and Panchkula has been growing fast at a rate of over 5% per year in the last decade.
There has been a phenomenal growth in the population of vehicles as well especially the
two and four wheelers in this period and their rising use due to rising household incomes.
Chandigarh has the highest per capita income in the country. Besides nearby towns such
as Zirakpur, Kharar and Dera Bassi in Punjab, Pinjore-Kalka and Alipur Kot Behla in
Haryana and Baddi- Nalagarh and Parwanu in Himachal Pradesh (shown in Figure 0.1)
are also growing fast and have large traffic interaction with the CUC. In the absence of
adequate and quality mass transport system, people are using the personalized modes
which is not only leading to congestion on road network but also increasing
environmental pollution. Such growing congestion is resulting in loss of productivity,
reduced air quality, reduced quality of life, and increased costs for services and goods.
0.1.2 The analysis of collected data from primary and secondary sources has brought the
following major issues regarding the transport system of CUC.
1 Road network capacity in CUC is adequate for now but major travel corridors are
beginning to become congested. Travel speeds are generally good but on some roads,
speeds are declining. Most of the major roads are with four lane/six with limited
scope of their widening. This indicates the need for judicious use of available road
space. Thus there is need to optimise the available capacity by adopting transport
system management measures.
2 Traffic composition on roads indicates very high share of two wheelers on most
roads. The share of cars is also growing. On some of the roads, the share of two
wheelers and cars in total traffic is more than 80%. This indicates inadequate public
transport system. Although V/C ratios on most of the roads are less than 1, these are
approaching their capacity fast. Some roads are already serving traffic volumes more
than the capacity. The situation is likely to worsen considering the high growth
anticipated in CUC and nearby towns. This not only indicates the need of augmenting
road capacity but also the need to plan high capacity mass transport systems on many
corridors.
PARWANU
KALKA
PINJORE
KHARAR CHANDIGARH
MOHALI PANCHKULA
DERA BASSI
3 Many junctions particularly on Madhya Marg, Himalaya Marg, Dakshin Marg, Jan
Marg, Purv Marg, Udygpath etc have very high approach traffic volumes and most of
the junctions with rotaries have exceeded their capacity. With expected growth of
traffic, the situation at these junctions is likely to deteriorate fast. It is observed that a
high share of traffic at these junctions is straight moving along the major road. Thus
provision of underpasses at these junctions along the major straight travel direction
with rotary being retained seems to solve the problem in the best manner. The balance
traffic can continue to move at grade around the rotary. This also helps in maintaining
the aesthetics of Chandigarh.
4 Outer cordon surveys indicate high through traffic to the CUC. This points to the
need of road bypasses to the CUC. High goods traffic also indicates the need of
freight terminals at the periphery of the CUC.
5 The household travel surveys indicate high ownership of cars and two wheelers. 86%
of households own at least one car or two-wheeler. In the absence of city wide and
high quality mass transport system, their use is growing. The household surveys also
indicate high share of work trips. This segment of travel demand needs to be mostly
satisfied by public transport system. Considering the large employment centres being
planned in the CUC and nearby towns, the mass transport system needs to be
upgraded/extended substantially.
6 At present, modal split in favour of public transport is only 16% of total motorised
person trips. This modal share is very low. Adequate and quality public transport
system needs to be provided to the people in order to increase the share of mass
transport trips. Share of two wheelers and cars in travel (73% of total motorised
person trips) is disturbingly very high. This trend needs to be arrested.
7 Out of total person trips in CUC, the share of walk trips is 17%. Walk trips as feeder
to buses and other modes are additional. There is high pedestrian traffic in core area
and some other areas in Chandigarh. Footpath facilities are generally not adequate
and their condition is deteriorating. Therefore up-gradation of their facilities is very
important. Share of cycle traffic has declined over the years. This mode of transport
needs to be promoted by providing cycle tracks along the roads.
9 The City Development Plan of Chandigarh has provided for densification of certain
areas. This is likely to have a major impact on traffic demand. The transport network
including mass transport system needs to be planned taking the proposed
development in to consideration.
10 Major developments have been proposed in the suburban towns of CUC. This is
likely to further increase interaction between CUC and these suburban towns. There
will be need to provide adequate and quality commuter services to these towns from
CUC.
0.1.3 Thus while planning for the transport system of CUC, the above problems and issues
need to be kept in consideration. Developments in Chandigarh have been low rise and
consideration for aesthetics has been important in all planning efforts. Therefore this
aspect has to be considered seriously while planning for transport system. The issues
relating to traffic and transportation in a large and growing city like CUC need to be
viewed in the larger perspective of urban and regional planning and development. Issues
relating to land use planning and development control, public-private transportation
policy and industrial location would need to be integrated at the perspective planning
level. The CUC will require a multi-modal transport system. Thus there will be need to
coordinate inter-modal transport issues.
0.2.1 Chandigarh and particularly nearby towns are planned to experience high growth in
coming decades. Projected population for Chandigarh and other towns as per their
development plans is given in Table 0.1. Thus population of these towns is expected to
grow from 21 lakh in 2009 to 59 lakh in 2041. Many high density areas are being planned
in Chandigarh. Various industrial areas and other economic activities are being planned
and developed in the CUC and nearby towns. This will increase employment
opportunities in these areas. Therefore it is prudent that a compatible, adequate and
extensive mass transport network system and road system is planned and developed in
order to meet the transport demand up to 2041.
Table 0.1 Projected Population of Chandigarh Urban Complex and Nearby Towns
Population
S.N Name of Town 2001 2009 2011 2021 2031 2041
1 Chandigarh 900635 1326821 1459274 1795461 2349824 2801127
2 SAS Nagar 123484 182456 241451 649472 815308 1029094
3 Panchkula 140925 228800 251054 495975 542253 567284
4 Zirakpur 25022 63204 132807 185162 233028 293305
5 Kharar 42289 70167 79664 111069 139781 175938
6 Kalka-Pinjore 77500 121221 135625 257688 518568 572822
7 Dera Bassi 15841 62903 88796 123801 155805 196106
8 Baddi 22601 42928 50396 88103 130253 192568
9 Alipur -Kot Behla 3324 7215 9050 42399 46834 51733
10 Parwanu 8609 11782 12743 18862 22992 28027
Total 1360230 2117497 2460860 3767992 4954646 5908004
0.2.2 Four stage transport demand model has been adopted to estimate future transport demand
up to 2041. Total daily intra-city person trips in CUC are expected to increase from 24.5
lakh in 2009 to 61 lakh in 2041. Total daily inter-city trips are estimated to increase from
4.8 lakh in 2009 to 12.4 lakh in 2041. Modal split in favour of public transport system
needs to be increased from present 26% to 70% by 2041. Considering proposed land use
in various areas, transport demand modelling and forecasting has been done to identify
major corridors of travel in future. An integrated and multi-modal transport system has
been evolved to cater to projected transport demand in an effective and coordinated
manner.
0.3.1 Urban Transport Strategy can play an important role in tackling urban problems, traffic
congestion constraints and business efficiency which degrades the quality of life. Urban
Transport projects can reduce journey times and their unpredictability yielding large
savings of travel time and vehicle operating costs and thus release city’s economic and
social potential. Urban transport problems of CUC have been analysed in the context of
area-wide issues and transport strategy evolved. Special attention has been paid to
aesthetics aspects so that the proposed system gels well with the environment. In order to
prepare the Comprehensive Mobility Plan the following policy measures have been
considered.
1 Provision of high capacity mass transport corridors along trunk corridors and
extension of mass transport system to provide wide coverage and transport integration
with other modes of transport.
2 Provide substantially large network of medium level mass transport system such as
BRT to cover the areas beyond the Metro network and on over loaded corridors.
3 Landuse adjustments and densification of corridors along mass transport corridors
where possible.
4 Provision of commuter rail system upto Ambala, Pinjore-Kalka, Ludhiana and Baddi-
Nalagarh
5 Rationalisation of local bus system and its augmentation.
6 Improvement in traffic management through TSM measures.
7 Special facilities for pedestrians within the entire network specially in the core areas;
provision of pedestrian subways, footpaths and road furniture along the roads where
necessary.
8 Developing V-6 and V-7 roads as pedestrian and cycle pathways across sectors and
facilitate their movement across two adjoining sectors.
9 Diverting through traffic on bypasses, providing transport hubs at the periphery of
CUC.
10 Improving primary, arterial and other important roads (particularly radial and ring
roads) by providing grade separation in the form of underpasses, junction
improvements, adding missing links, widening and other road side facilities wherever
necessary.
0.4.1 On the basis of projected traffic, an integrated multi-modal mass transport system plan on
various corridors has been suggested in order to cater to traffic up to the year 2041. The
mass transport systems have been proposed on various corridors considering expected
traffic demand by 2041, available road right-of-ways and system capacity. The balance
traffic should be carried by road system in order to satisfy the needs of normal bus system
and other modes such as two wheelers, cars, bicycles, trucks, pedestrians etc. The
proposed Comprehensive Mobility Plan for CUC contains the following types of
proposals, which will cater to requirements of the projected travel demand up to the year
2041.
0.4.3 Components of Medium and Long Term Traffic and Transportation Plan
• Road Infrastructure
• Parking Facilities
• Inter-modal Interchanges
• Integrated Freight Complexes
0.4.4 Integrated multi modal transport system has been recommended in order to ensure
seamless travel. For the balance travel demand, road improvement proposals have been
formulated. While making road proposals, entire corridor has been proposed to be
improved instead of isolated improvements.
0.4.5 The proposed mass transport corridors are shown in Table 0.2 and Figure 0.2. Proposals
pertaining to city bus system (other than BRT), parking, pedestrian and road
improvement proposals are shown in Figures 0.3. Regional transportation proposals
outside CUC are shown in Figure 0.4. Summary of proposals is given in Table 0.3.
0.5.1 Overall cost for various proposed projects in Chandigarh Urban Complex and Regional
Transport Projects is estimated as Rs 21253 Crore as given in Table 0.3.
Table 0.3 Summary of Proposed Projects and Cost Estimates (2009 prices)
Table 0.4 Summary of Cost Estimates of for various Proposals at 2009 Prices State wise –
Chandigarh Urban Complex
0.5.1 Rail based mass transit systems are characterised by heavy capital investments coupled
with long gestation periods leading to low financial rates of return although the economic
benefits to the society are immense. Considering this, an attempt has been made to carry
out preliminary economic and financial appraisal of Phase I of the Chandigarh Metro.
0.5.2 Economic analysis for the metro system has been carried out within the framework of
“with” and “without” the project. The “without the project” situation assesses the cost to
the economy in case the projected volume of traffic continues to move by the prevailing
modes of transport. The “with the project” situation estimates the total costs that the
economy would have to bear for introducing the metro. The cost under the above two
situations has been evaluated in terms of market prices and then in economic terms, Cost
stream of the project consists of capital cost of infrastructure and rolling stock, additional
capital cost and replacement costs during the operation and O& M cost of the metro for
the appraisal period. Benefits from the project include savings in vehicle operating costs
of vehicles, travel time of passengers, savings in pollution etc apart from many non-
tangible benefits. The EIRR in economic terms works out to 12.86 % for the metro
project. It is accordingly seen that the proposed project is economically viable.
0.5.3 Four scenarios of financial analysis have been carried out. This financial analysis shows
that the project is financially unviable with fare box revenue alone at average fare of Rs
12 per passenger in order to recover capital and O&M costs. The average fare per
passenger will have to be Rs 35 per passenger in order to break even for full recovery of
capital and O&M costs. The fare is high to be affordable to people. This will also not
interest private BOT operator as the return is 0%. In order to get return of 13%, the fare
will have to be Rs 120 per passenger which is very high. This will also not interest
private BOT operator as the return of 13% will cover only debt repayments. The fourth
scenario shows that in order to give return of 25% to the BOT operator, the fare will have
to be Rs 280 per passenger which is very exorbitant. This analysis shows that it seems
impossible to involve private sector or go in for PPP model for funding the entire project
i.e. provision of Civil Works, Electrical & Signaling systems, Rolling Stock and
operating the system with fare box as the only source of revenue. In fact it has also been
observed that even if we try to get the project taken up on PPP basis with assured annuity
payments to the private partner, the amount of annuity payment after providing for atleast
25% returns will be of the order of Rs 3000 crore for atleast 30 years i.e an overall
payment of Rs. 90000 crore.
0.5.4 Thus the entire capital costs will have to be borne by government. Only O & M of the
system can be given to private operator. Further analysis has been done with only O& M
cost and additional/replacement costs to borne by private operator with fare box revenues
and advertisement/limited property development revenues going to the operator. This
analysis has been done for two scenarios- the first with fare box revenue alone going to
operator and the second – with fare box revenue and advertisement/limited property
development revenues (estimated at 50% of farebox revenues) going to operator. In order
to get a return of 25% for the private operator, the average fare will have to be Rs 18.38
per passenger in the first scenario. This average fare is worked out as Rs 12.27 for the
second scenario. It is thus obvious from the above financial analysis that capital cost of
the project will have to be borne by government. Private operator can be involved only in
O & M of the system.
A Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) may be formed with the participation of Chandigarh
Administration and Ministry of Urban Development, Government as joint venture
partners with 50:50 equity. Later State Governments of Punjab and Haryana may also
join this SPV when the metro system is extended to Mohali and Panchkula. This SPV
will own the metro system and will be responsible for implementation of the system.
Capital cost of Rs 8995 may be funded with debt equity ratio of 3:1. This SPV would
arrange for funds through equity to be contributed by all partners. The SPV would have
the powers to raise debt funds from any of the national/ international F.I’s, Banks and/or
raise long term bonds to meet debt requirements. Annual debt repayment is assumed to
be done for 15 years after moratorium of 4 years of construction period. Scenarios for
rate of interest for the debt are assumed as 3% pa (through international agencies) and
10% pa (national financial institutions).
As the metro project benefits the city of Chandigarh, it is important that substantial part
of the project cost is funded through local sources. The proposed metro system passes
along Himalaya Marg and Vikas Marg where abutting land for commercial purposes is
lying vacant and is still to be sold. The proposed system will greatly benefit the
businesses which will be developed after some time on these roads. Therefore it is
important that this benefit passes to the metro system. In this context it is proposed that
the vacant that unsold commercial land along Himalaya Marg and Vikas Marg (about 230
acres) may be handed over to the SPV for revenue generation through auction. Of this
50% will be available for commercial sale. In the past this commercial land has been
auctioned at the rate of Rs 3 lakh per sq yard. Same auction price is assumed for this
unused land. This is conservative estimate for generating revenue through auction of
unused land. Actual realization may be more. Thus this unused commercial land may be
auctioned in stages every year in 15 years to meet the annual debt repayment
Additiona
Annual Total sale l auction Total
DEBT Debt Annual of comm. of com. auction of
AT EQUITY Payment auction of land Land to com. land
COMP AT COMPLE for 15 years comm. land required meet required to
L-- COMPLE TION after required to to service equity of meet
ETION TION (Rs COST constructio service debt debt CA equity also
ROI(%) (Rs cr) cr) (Rs cr) n (Rs cr) (acre) (acre) (50%) (acre)
The above table indicates that in case the equity is provided through budgetary sources to
the SPV, and it is able to obtain loan at 3% pa through international funding, the loan can
be repaid over a period of 15 years through an annual sale of around 4 ha of commercial
land. However if the cost of funds increases to 10 % pa, the land required to be auctioned
will be around 6.78 ha per year. In this case the total land required to be auctioned will be
approx. 102 ha in 15 years. It is seen that in worst case scenario, the total land
requirement is 110 acres (saleable land out of total 220 acres) in 15 years which is
available now on Himalaya Marg and Vikas Marg. This even includes equity requirement
of CA. Thus the available unused commercial land on Himalaya Marg and Vikas Marg
can easily meet debt requirements of the project. In order supplement the resource base
for generating funds for debt servicing / repayments, “dedicated levies” on Registration
of Motor Vehicles, Sale of Petrol & Diesel, and Sale of Liquor can also be thought of.
The revenue generated through these measures is estimated as about Rs 100 crores per
year.
The O & M of the metro system may be given to a private operator. The private operator
will also have to meet the additional cost of rolling stock to cater to increase in traffic and
replacement costs in addition to meet O & M Costs for 30 years. As already indicated,
only farebox revenue cannot meet private operator’s costs. The operator will also have to
be given the right to generate revenue through advertisement in trains/stations and limited
property development at stations. These revenue streams will cover operator’s costs and
provide adequate return. In financial bids for selection of operator, the selection criteria
can be the annuity amount which the bidder can ask for to meet all the costs with
adequate return or the bidder can give annuity to the SPV. Alternatively, the SPV may
also keep the right to collect revenues through advertisements and ask the bidder to quote
the annuity amount to be paid to the selected operator. In case, the annuity amount has to
be paid to the selected operator, the SPV can meet this amount through the revenue
collected through dedicated levies as mentioned above.
0.6.1 The current structure of governance for the transport sector is not adequately equipped to
deal with the problems of urban transport. Multiplicity of organizations, independent
legislations and inherent conflict in the roles and responsibilities of stakeholders actually
impede in the process of planning and implementation of major schemes aimed at
development. Thus coordination between various agencies becomes a major issue.
Though the Study covers the transportation problems in the Chandigarh Urban Complex
comprising Chandigarh, Mohali and Panchkula. The impact of the traffic from the
neighboring towns has also to be taken into consideration. The extended study region
consists of the towns of Zirakpur, Kharar, Dera-Bassi in Punjab; Alipur-Kot Behla
complex, Kalka-Pinjore Complex in Haryana and Prawanu & Baddi in Himachal
Pradesh. These towns lie in outer belt and the substantial traffic which emanates from or
bound for these passes through the Chandigarh Urban Complex. Thus an agency in the
form of a Regional & Urban Transport Development Board (RUTDB) may be formed on
the lines of the UMTA / NCR Planning Board under Govt. of India with all the respective
state Govts. and concerned central govt. agencies like Railways and NHAI as its
members. This Board could coordinate the planning and implementation of the all the
Transport proposals within the Region as well as the Urban Complex and resolve any
inter-state transport problems.
0.6.2 Metro system has been proposed for the CUC. To implement this project, a special
purpose vehicle by the name of Chandigarh Urban Complex Mass Rapid Transit
Corporation (CUMTC) may be set up. The CUMTC will work under overall guidance of
the Regional & Urban Transport Development Board. CUMTC can be a Joint Venture
company with 50:50 equity participation from Chandigarh Administration and MOUD,
GOI. Later on when the system extends in Mohali and Panchkula. the State Govt. of
Punjab and Haryana may also join this SPV by equity participation. CUMTC would
arrange for funds through equity to be contributed by all partners. It would have the
powers to raise debt funds from any of the national / international F.I.’s, Banks and / or
raise long term bonds.
0.6.3 Engineering Department of the Chandigarh Administration deals with road construction
and maintenance. Traffic Police looks after traffic management in the city. There are
numerous issues of proper road geometrics, traffic circulation, junction design, traffic
signals, road signs/markings, street furniture etc which are not properly attended to by
these agencies due to lack of traffic engineering expertise. Traffic planning is a
continuous affair. It is therefore important that Traffic Engineering Cells (TEC) are
established in these organizations with qualified and adequate staff such as traffic
engineers. This will ensure that the traffic schemes are properly implemented with better
results and fine tuned later, if necessary. This will go a long way to improve traffic flow
in Chandigarh. Similar TECs should also be set up for Mohali and Panchkula in the
concerned agencies i.e HUDA, PUDA, GMADA, Public Works Department, and Traffic
Police etc.
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
1.1.1 Chandigarh, Union Territory of India, has population of 9 lakh as per 2001 Census.
The city is also the capital of the States of Haryana and Punjab. Two towns of
Panchkula (population 1.41 lakh in 2001) in Haryana and Mohali (population 1.23
lakh in 2001) in Punjab are very close and constitute part of Chandigarh Urban
Complex. Besides, Zirakpur and Kharar in Punjab are coming up in the vicinity and
are almost part of this agglomeration now. The towns of Dera Bassi in Punjab, Pinjore
and Kalka in Haryana and Parwanu and Baddi in Himachal Pradesh are also located at
short distances and a large number of passengers travel between these towns and
Chandigarh/Panchkula/Mohali daily. All these towns are just contiguous to
Chandigarh and have very strong interaction with the city, thus making Chandigarh
Urban Complex practically a larger urban area.
1.1.2 Chandigarh is a premier centre for education, medical institutes and emerging fast as a
major IT/ITES hub in North India. The city is having highest per capita income in
India. A modern and well-planned city, it is attracting IT and other industries and is
undergoing an economic surge. It is also fast emerging as an important tourist
destination. The high growth and improvement in living standards has led to
remarkable increase in the number of registered motorized vehicles and their resultant
increased use in the absence of adequate and quality public transport system in
Chandigarh. Decadal growth rate indicate a consistent upward trend. Due to rapid
increase in motor vehicles coupled with marginal increase in road infrastructure,
traffic and transportation problems have been growing rapidly. Being the
administrative centre of two States and a Union Territory, the Chandigarh Urban
Complex also attracts a lot of regional traffic. Traffic congestion is already severe on
many road sections. Parking problems are aggravating. Vehicular pollution is
assuming critical dimensions. Existing mass transport system for inter-city and intra-
city movement in the form of buses is inadequate.
1.2.1 Population
Base year (2009) population estimation for the study area has been done on the basis
of electoral list, divisional growth trends, proposals for the master plan of Chandigarh
and City Development Plan of Chandigarh, Outline Master Plans of SAS Nagar,
Structural plan 2008-2058 of Greater Mohali Region, Development Plan for
Panchkula Urban Estate Extension and MDC areas, Development Plan of Kalka-
Study area employment has been estimated on the basis of total population and Work
Force Participation Rate (WFPR). As per 2009 estimation, aggregate WFPR in the
study area is 36.42 % with Chandigarh having highest WFPR as compared to SAS
Nagar & Panchkula, Zirakpur, Kalka Pinjore, Kharar, Dera bassi expect Baddi having
WFPR of 46% (refer Table 1.2).
Table 1.2 Work Force and Work Force Participation Rate of the Study Area
There were more than 6 lakh motor vehicles registered in Chandigarh in 2005 as
shown in Table 1.3. 2-wheelers account for around 71.5% and Cars/Jeeps around
27% of total vehicles registered. Motor vehicles are growing at an average rate of
5.27% per annum whereas cars/jeeps are growing at an average rate of 7.03% per
annum. Motor vehicles ownership in Chandigarh is one of the highest in India. This is
an indirect indication of inadequate public transport services in the study area. The
increase in use of private vehicle directly contributes to increase in total vehicle
kilometers traveled increase traffic congestion on roads and high emission levels of
vehicular pollution.
Table 1.4 shows the traffic accident trends in Chandigarh from 2004 to 2007. About
5253 road accidents were recorded in year 2007-08. The heterogeneity and magnitude
of vehicle population, the unpredictability of human behaviour, the economic
Year Accident Fatal Fatal Non Minor Total Number of Deaths Due to
related FIR Non Fatal Cases Vehicles Road Accidents
calls to FIR Regd.
P.C.R
per 10,000 per 1 lakh
Registered population
Vehicles
2007 5253 141 1 396 3310 NA NA NA
2006 4492 144 2 379 3345 635382 2.298 13.273
2005 4564 135 3 391 3711 600000 2.300 13.205
2004 3967 143 5 269 3607 577487 2.563 14.668
Source: www.Chandigarhtrafficpolice.org
1.4.2 An Electric Trolley Bus (ETB) System was one of the options proposed to
Chandigarh Administration by Bharat Heavy Electrical Limited (BHEL) based on a
techno-economical feasibility study undertaken in the year 2001. A Detailed Project
Report was prepared for implementation of the ETB project in Chandigarh between
Mohali and Panchkula covering a track length of 39 Kms approx. on a Build, Own,
Operate & Transfer (BOOT) basis. The recommendations of Detailed Project Report
included the implementation in two phases over two years after the financial closure.
The first phase of track length included 26 Kms between Panchkula and PGI,
Chandigarh whereas second phase was proposed to cover 13 Kms approx. between
Mohali and Sector 1, Chandigarh. However this project was not pursued due to
aesthetic reasons.
1.4.3 RITES conducted a feasibility study of ‘Mass Rapid Transit System for Chandigarh
Urban Complex’ consisting of Chandigarh, Panchkula and Mohali in 2005-06. A
mass rapid transit system on three corridors with 36 km length and 38 stations
including an interchange station at Sector 17 was proposed to be provided in
Chandigarh Urban Complex in Phase I to meet the growing mass transport demand.
Considering the characteristics of various mass transit systems and expected transport
demand, Monorail based Light Metro system on the three corridors was recommended
for implementation in Chandigarh Urban Complex.
1.4.4 In 2007, an Expert Committee was formed to examine the issue of system selection
for mass transport system. The committee recommended surface light rail transport
system. Later in the meeting in year 2008 between Ministry of Urban Development,
Government of India and Governments of Haryana, Punjab and Chandigarh
Administration, it was decided to have an underground metro system on the select
corridors of Chandigarh due to aesthetic reasons.
1.5.1 The Chandigarh Urban Complex is poised for a higher growth in coming decades.
The above problems are bound to grow in magnitude unless advance actions are
undertaken now. There is an urgent need for significant improvements in the transport
system including mass transport system keeping in view the long term requirements.
The Chandigarh Administration., Government of Punjab, Government of Haryana and
Government of Himachal Pradesh are seized of the matter and are contemplating to
take up advance measures.
1.5.2 Considering above, the Chandigarh Administration commissioned the services of
RITES to prepare “Comprehensive Mobility Plan” for Chandigarh Urban Complex
and its linkages to the towns of Kharar, Zirakpur, Dera Bassi, Pinjore, Kalka, Alipur
Kot Behla and Baddi.
The area extending to Chandigarh, Panchkula, Mohali and Zirakpur has been taken as
the study area. However for the purpose of the transport linkages to Chandigarh
Urban Complex the towns of Kharar, Derabassi, Pinjore, Kalka, Alipur Kot Behla,
Parwanu and Baddi have also been considered. The effect of traffic coming from
outside Chandigarh Urban Complex and using Chandigarh transport system has also
been taken into account. The Study Area is shown in Figure 1.1.
PARWANU
KALKA
PINJORE
KHARAR CHANDIGARH
MOHALI PANCHKULA
DERA BASSI
Comprehensive Mobility Plan would integrate mobility plan with land use plan and
spelled out the projected mobility needs of the cities as also the manner in which such
mobility needs are proposed to be met.
The focus would be on analyzing the existing transportation scenario; examine the
pattern of growth of the town and projecting the passenger and freight mobility
requirements for the next 30 years, keeping in view the attributes like population,
employment, business, commerce, industry, growth of the cities, among others.
As a part of this exercise and in order to meet the present and projected mobility
needs of the cities and region, several projects for implementation under short,
medium and long term would get identified for the cities. The broad scope of work
for the study is as follows
CHAPTER 2
The output from various types of surveys and their respective usages are summarized
below in Table 2.1:
The following parameters have been taken into consideration for problem
identification:
The improvement plans includes the detailed analysis of existing physical & traffic
characteristics of the junction and development of alternative improvement options.
- Pedestrian/Zebra Crossings
Necessary traffic management measures have also been examined for the junctions
including turning restrictions in general to certain nodes. The proposals have been
developed in consultation with the Client and local police in order to incorporate their
views in the proposal.
Efforts have also been made to ensure that pedestrians are not exposed to safety risks.
Zebra markings are recommended at appropriate places where ‘across’ pedestrian
traffic is significant and an analysis of PV2 (pedestrian-vehicular conflict) has also
been done to assess the need for grade-separated pedestrian facilities viz. subways and
pedestrian over-bridge. It has been proposed to provide pedestrian subways/foot over
bridges at all metro stations and at-grade pedestrian crossing at all critical junctions.
Options for an integrated multi-modal network have been developed and evaluated
and a feasible and acceptable system has been proposed for further detailing.
All the proposals relating to public transport infrastructure, terminals, depots, road
widening and new links has been integrated with metro rail based mass transit system
for Chandigarh Urban Complex.
These alternatives has been evaluated on the basis of pre-determined set of evaluation
criteria such as transport demand satisfied, length of networks, cost and productivity
of networks, operational and economic feasibility.
After making an estimate of travel demand on the public transport network that needs
to be developed, an assessment about possible alternative transport systems in relation
to various corridors has been undertaken and an objective and technology neutral
evaluation has been carried out based on a set of parameters as listed hereunder:
(a) Capacity
(b) Right-of-way requirements
(c) Speed
(d) Capital & Operating Costs of various systems
(e) Affordability
(f) Environmental impacts
(g) Social impacts
Road based systems are the first choice of mass transit systems as generally the
infrastructure is available and can be upgraded at minimal cost. Alternative road
based systems are:
- buses operating in mixed traffic conditions
- buses operating in segregated busways (at grade)
- Buses operating on segregated right of way.
Alternative rail based system are metro rail, light rail transit, monorail etc. The
Chandigarh Administration has, however, with the approval and consent of Ministry
of Urban Development, Government of India, decided to adopt underground Metro
Rail based Mass Rapid Transit System for the main corridors for the Chandigarh
Urban Complex. Therefore, other modes of transport should be planned to integrate
with Metro.
The most appropriate option for multi-modal network and system has been
recommended on the basis of above evaluation as well as in consultation with the
Client.
CHAPTER- 3
ROAD NETWORK CHARACTERISTICS
3.1 BACKGROUND
3.1.1 Road Network Inventory within the Chandigarh Urban Complex (Chandigarh,
Panchkula, Mohali and Zirakpur) was carried out as a part of the study for primary
and secondary roads. A coded road network has been prepared covering all primary
and secondary roads. Each junction has been numbered as a node and the road
connecting any two nodes is defined as a link. For the purpose of the network survey
V1, V2 and V3 roads are considered. The total existing road network of Chandigarh
Urban Complex considered for this study consists of total 514 links. The total length
of covered road network is 487 Km with average link length of 0.95 Km.
3.1.2 The basic character of Chandigarh plan is based on the sector plan and the transport
network grids. Each sector is practically self contained, planned inwords, with all the
properties having back on the sector dividing V3 roads. The entry for these sectors
from the V2 & V3 roads is limited to a single intermediate entry either through V4 or
V5. Thus there functions of V4/V5 with sector dividing roads V3 are the main points
of traffic discharge and inlets for the sectors.
3.1.3 The data collected as part of this survey includes carriageway width, right of way,
availability of footpath, median, street lighting and abutting land-use. The summary of
road network characteristics as emerging from this survey is presented in subsequent
paragraphs. Road network inventory survey proforma is given as Annexure 3.1.
About 44% of the surveyed road length has ROW between 30 to 40 m, 25% has ROW
between 20 to 30 m and 12% has ROW less than 20m & about 13% road network has
ROW more than 60m as indicated in Table 3.1. This indicates the limitation of
widening of roads for many of the roads.
Majority of the roads as per the above table are V3 roads with ROW of 30 meter,
which are sector periphery roads. The higher category roads, with ROW of 60 meter
are just few arterial roads like Madhya Marg, Dakshin Marg, Vikas Marg and Jan
Marg between Cricket Stadium, Sector 16 and Secretariat.
The distribution of Road Network as per carriageway width is presented in Table 3.2.
It can be observed that about 30% of surveyed road network length consists of three
lane width, about 24% has 6-lane width and 17% has six or more lane widths. 12% of
Road Network has carriageway width of 2-lane.
3.2.3 Median
The median is available on about 36% of the road network as shown in Table 3.3
It is observed from Table 3.4 that about 15% of the road network has service lanes
and rest of the network is without service lane. Thus most of the primary roads do not
have a service road which affects their capacity adversely. Majority of the road length
with service road is having service lane on both sides.
Conceptually most of the V3 sector dividing roads has back of abutting properties and
as such since there is no access, no service roads are provided. Only in case of V2
roads where commercial and institutional buildings, are facing the roads, service
roads and where necessary parking along these are provided.
Availability of street lights by type and their locations has been presented in Table
3.5 & Table 3.6. It is observed that about 62% of road network is having sodium
street lights. It has also been observed that about 26% of the road network has street
lights located on median and another 33% of road network has street light located on
one side of the road and 5% of road network has street lights located on both sides of
the road. About 36% of the road network is without street lights.
The distribution of road network as per the road condition is presented in Table 3.7. It
is observed that about 58% of road network has good road condition, and about only
9% has poor road surface condition.
The distribution of road network with respect to land-use is presented in Table 3.8. It
has been observed that nearly 41.47% road network is abutted by residential landuse
and about 10.14% by commercial landuse. About 30% of the road network is abutted
by vacant land.
3.2.8.1 In the V7 hierarchy of the road network planned for Chandigarh, foot paths and cycle
tracks were supposed to play a critical role. The V7, were specifically meant for
cycles and pedestrian. Though provision for V7 has been made through the centres of
practically each sector, they have not been fully developed as pedestrian paths and
still rarely used by the pedestrians. In addition along few V3 sector roads such
cycle/pedestrian paths have been provided.
3.2.8.2 Footpaths are available along about 38% of the road length as presented in Table 3.9.
Thus a large length of road network is without footpaths. However, quality of
footpaths in terms of surface, width and geometrics leaves much to be desired.
3.3.1 Traffic speed as delay survey was conducted on the identified road network by
moving car method during peak and off-peak periods. The survey proforma is given
as Annexure 3.2.
3.3.3 Distribution of road length by peak/off-peak period running speed of traffic is given
in Table 3.11. It is observed that 61% of road length has running speed less than 40
Kmph. This figure comes down to 44% for off-peak period. Average running speed
for peak and off-peak period for city as a whole is found as 34 Kmph and 37 Kmph
respectively.
3.3.4 There is not greatly significant variation between peak and off-peak speeds. The
travel speeds are generally good, however on certain corridors the speed are low due
to high traffic.
3.3.5 Delay to traffic stream occurs due to traffic signals at junctions. Traffic congestions
on road sections (due to traffic, road side encroachments, road accidents, lack of lane
discipline etc.), presence of signals at short length etc. Table 3.12 shows that there are
about 133 locations of delay in Chandigarh urban complex. Traffic signals accounts
for majority of delays. This indicates junction improvements are necessary to
minimize delays. Traffic congestions on road section (due to reasons as listed above)
are also the major reason.
Table 3.12 Distribution of Causes of Delays
3.3.6 Distribute of amount of delay at various locations is given in Table 3.13. Over 87%
of locations have delays upto1 minute.
3.4 CONCLUSIONS
3.4.1 Majority of the roads are V3 roads with ROW of 30 meter, which are sector periphery
roads. The higher category roads, with ROW of 60 meter are just few arterial roads
like Madhya Marg, Dakshin Marg, Vikas Marg and Jan Marg between Cricket
Stadium, Sector 16 and Secretariat.
3.4.2 There is not greatly significant variation between peak and off-peak speeds. The
travel speeds are generally good, however on certain corridors the speed are low due
to high traffic.
3.4.3 It indicates that there is practically no scope for further widening of V3 roads except
some geometric improvement at junctions. Further if the traffic grows with the
existing pace the existing major road network will get choked in the following decade.
Therefore to overcome the problem a citywide good public mass transport system is
urgently required for Chandigarh Urban Complex.
CHAPTER- 4
TRAFFIC CHARCTERISTICS
4.1 INTRODUCTION
The first and foremost step to be initiated in the development of any Comprehensive
Mobility Plan for a city is the collection of data relevant to the traffic and travel
pattern of the residents of the city and the factors which influence the travel pattern.
Transportation studies have revealed that the travel pattern in any urban
agglomeration is strikingly regular and a definite pattern develops in the movement of
people which can be anticipated for the future years also. This in turn helps in
developing a transportation plan with a reasonable level of confidence. This data
collection is done through secondary sources and conduct of primary surveys. Some
of the data collected through secondary sources has already been given in Chapter 2.
This chapter gives account of primary traffic surveys conducted as a part of this study
and emerging traffic characteristics. This database will help in identifying issues and
in travel demand modeling and forecasting exercise.
4.2.1 A number of primary traffic volume surveys have been conducted to collect the traffic
data for the present day scenario as part of existing traffic characteristics appreciation
for the study area.
1 Road side origin-destination survey at 12 cordon locations (9 outer cordon and
4 inner cordons) along with classified traffic volume counts and occupancy
surveys.
2 Classified traffic volume count survey at mid blocks including occupancy
surveys (15 location)
3 Classified traffic volume count survey at major intersections (20 Intersections)
4.2.2 The survey proforma for these surveys is given in Annexure 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3. The
data collected through the above field surveys have been analysed to assess the
present classified traffic volumes and movement pattern at various identified
corridors/locations. Sailient features of the traffic characteristics are given in this
chapter.
entry points from Chandigarh, Panchkula and Mohali. The quantum and temporal
variation of total daily traffic, peak hour traffic, Intensity and directional distribution
of traffic and composition of vehicles and passenger trips moving in the study area are
presented in the following sections. The passenger car unit (PCU) factors adopted are
presented in Table 4.1
The traffic volume counts both in terms of numbers of vehicles and passenger car
units (PCUs) have been computed for the total daily (24 hour) traffic at various outer
cordon locations are presented in Table 4.3. It is observed that the traffic at different
locations varies from 1272 PCU’s (1137 Vehicle) Morni Road to 46951 PCU’s
(46176 Vehicle) at NH-21 between Chandigarh and Kharar throughout a normal fair
weather working day. It is seen that about 1,52,650 vehicles enter or leave Chandigarh
Urban Complex on a typical working day.
4.3.4 The modewise composition of traffic and hourly variation of traffic volume at outer
cordon locations is presented in Annexure 4.4 and 4.5.
Table 4.4 Total Daily Traffic, Peak Hour Traffic and Directional Distribution of Traffic at Outer Cordon Locations
Table 4.5 Daily Traffic Composition (24 Hours) at Outer Cordon Locations
Composition (%)
Name of Location
Loc. No. Other Fast Slow
Car/ Goods
Bus Moving
Outer Cordon Jeep TW Auto Vehicle
vehicle
1 NH-21 Outside Dera Bassi (Ambala road) 45.43 29.84 2.09 5.84 11.97 4.82
2 NH-64 Near Zirakpur (Patiala Road) 32.50 30.63 3.87 5.65 23.53 3.82
3 Sarhind Road 47.40 30.53 3.36 2.00 8.90 7.81
4 NH-21 (Outside Kharar) 42.19 26.22 3.19 5.97 14.36 8.07
5 Near Chandigarh Out Side Khuda Lohra 29.90 42.49 4.62 1.35 7.31 14.33
6 NH-21 (Outside Baddi) 29.67 26.69 0.62 5.93 34.63 2.46
7 NH-22 Outside Kalka (Shimla Road) 42.09 32.47 0.03 2.74 22.33 0.33
8 Near Panchkula (Morni Road) 33.16 40.02 0.35 10.2 9.15 7.12
9 Nh-73 Outside Panchkula 29.07 21.37 2.07 3.70 42.66 1.13
Loc. No. Inner Cordon
10 NH-22 Between Panchkula and Pinjore 36.09 21.52 3.66 4.06 34.21 0.44
11 NH-21 Between Zirakpur and Dera Bassi 43.33 30.0. 3.86 5.29 8.66 8.84
12 NH-21 Between Chandigarh and Kharar 32.39 33.89 8.94 4.37 7.53 12.89
13 NH 21 A Between Pinjore And Baddi 31.57 26.91 0.92 2.78 33.82 4.00
Source: RITES Primary Survey 2008-09
4.3.5.2 Table 4.6 presents the peak hour traffic composition at outer cordon locations. The
table shows that the share of bus traffic in peak hour is as high as 10.2% at Morni
road near Panchkula. Average peak hour composition for bus is about 4.3%. Goods
traffic varies from 2.5% at outside Khuda Lahora to 38.6% at outside Baddi (NH21A
Baddi Nalagarh Road) at peak periods. Average peak hour share of goods traffic is
about 15.8%. Similarly, the share of slow moving passenger traffic varies from 0.2%
at NH-22 (Outside Kalka-Shimla road) to 20.6% at NH 21 (between Chandigarh and
Kharar). On an average, slow passenger vehicles have share of about 7.3%. The share
of fast moving passenger traffic varies from 50.5% at NH 21 (outside Baddi) to 82%
at between Zirakpur and Derabassi with an average of about 72.7%. Peak hour varies
from 0830 Hrs to 1100 Hrs (Morning) and 1515 Hrs to 1900 Hrs (Evening).
Table 4.6 Peak Hour Traffic Composition at Outer Cordon Locations
Peak Hour Composition (%)
Loc.no Name of the Location Peak Total Total Total Total
Hour Fast Buses Goods Slow
Outer Cordon
1100-1200 81.66 4.94 8.89 4.51
1 NH-21 Outside Dera Bassi (Ambala road)
1730-1830 77.60 4.12 10.85 7.43
915-1015 79.20 4.90 14.22 1.67
2 NH-64 Near Zirakpur (Patiala Road))
1645-1745 70.44 5.47 18.07 6.02
845-945 80.25 2.73 6.72 10.29
3 Sarhind Road
1730-1830 80.40 1.98 6.39 11.23
900-1000 75.77 4.52 6.72 13.00
4 NH-21 (Outside Kharar)
1630-1730 75.52 7.11 10.57 6.80
845-945 77.83 1.20 2.51 18.46
5 Near Chandigarh Out Side Khuda Lohra
1745-1845 77.16 0.54 4.17 18.13
830-930 74.42 4.93 18.92 1.73
6 NH-21 Outside Baddi
1515-1615 50.46 9.06 38.58 1.90
0845-0945 81.25 3.20 15.33 0.22
7 NH-22 Outside Kalka (Shimla Road)
1800-1900 76.93 2.99 19.69 0.39
0800-0900 72.22 10.19 4.63 12.96
8 Near Panchkula (Morni Road)
1500-1600 73.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
1115-1215 63.72 3.19 32.13 0.96
9 NH-73 Outside Panchkula
1630-1730 57.33 4.95 36.63 1.09
Loc.no. Inner Cordon
1100-1200 68.88 2.93 27.53 0.67
1 NH-22 Between Panchkula and Pinjore
1545-1645 65.87 4.54 29.08 0.51
0945-1045 78.22 4.48 8.19 9.10
2 NH-21 Between Zirakpur and Dera Bassi
1645-1745 81.81 3.39 6.55 8.26
0845-0945 75.79 3.25 4.87 16.09
3 NH-21 Between Chandigarh and Kharar
1715-1815 72.09 2.67 4.65 20.59
0845-0945 63.10 0.95 31.30 4.65
4 NH-21A Between Pinjore and Baddi
1530-16-30 58.73 3.21 34.18 3.87
Source: RITES Primary Survey 2008-09
Average Occupancy
Loc. no. Name Of Locations Car/Jeep/ Two Mini
Auto Bus
Van Whleer. Bus
Outer Cordon
7 NH-22 Outside Kalka (Shimla Road) 3.49 1.30 3.65 28.00 14.00
8 Near Panchkula (Morni Road) 2.23 1.04 2.00 36.00 13.00
9 NH-73 Outside Panchkula 3.15 1.34 3.48 31.50 12.00
Loc.no. Inner Cordon
1 NH-22 Between Panchkula and Pinjore 3.07 1.36 3.38 33.00 16.00
2 NH-21 Between Zirakpur and Dera Bassi 3.14 1.43 4.62 36.50 15.00
3 NH-21 Between Chandigarh and Kharar 2.97 1.40 4.37 38.50 15.00
4 NH-21A Between Pinjore and Baddi 3.15 1.32 2.00 38.33 14.00
Source: RITES Primary Survey 2008-09
4.3.6.2 Table 4.8 shows daily passenger trips at cordon locations. It is observed that the daily
passenger trips at different locations varies from 2144 trips at Morni road near
Panchkula to 140673 trips between Chandigarh and Kharar throughout the normal fair
weather working day. Locations handling more than 1 lakh trips per day are Ambala
Road, NH 21 outside Kharar and between Zirakpur and Derabassi. More than 8.3 lakh
passengers trips cross study area daily (bothways) on a typical working day. Bigger
traffic interaction of Chandigarh is with Kharar followed by Ambala, Derabassi and
Zirakpur. 50% of total trips are by buses. Cars account for 28% of the total trips. This
reflects the need of good public transport system for the study area, upto atleast the
outer cordons points at Derabassi, Kharar and Baddi which will inter-alia include
other intermediate towns enroute.
4.3.6.3 Locations handling more than 50,000 bus passenger trips per day are Ambala road
and Kharar road.
Table 4.8 Daily Passenger Trips at Outer Cordon (24 Hours) Locations
4.3.6.4 Peak hour fast moving passenger trips at cordon location, is presented in Table 4.9. It
is observed that the peak hour passenger trip varies from 161 trips at Morni road near
Panchkula to 10364 trips Between Chandigarh and Kharar throughout the fair weather
normal working day.
4.4.1 Origin – Destination survey of vehicles entering Chandigarh Urban complex was
conducted at 9 outer cordon locations. Overall daily traffic desire of Inter – city
traffic (passenger and freight) is shown in Figure 4.2 and Figure 4.3 respectively.
4.4.2 Figure 4.2 and Figure 4.3 indicates the need of bypass link between:
4.4.3 Table 4.10 indicates that of the total traffic of 4.93 lakh trips (cars, 2wheelers, auto
rickshaw and bus) about 1.41 lakh are through which is 28.7% of total traffic. Traffic
desire for through traffic is also shown in Figure 4.2. This indicates the need of road
bypass to Chandigarh Urban complex.
4.4.4 Table 4.11 indicates that of the total traffic of 26934 Vehicle (LCV, Trucks and
MAV) about 11062 Vehicle are through which is about 41% of total traffic. Traffic
desire for through traffic is also shown in Figure 4.3. This also indicates the need of
road bypass to Chandigarh Urban complex.
Figure 4.3 Desire Pattern of Inter-City Goods Traffic in Study Area (2008)
4.5.5 The modewise composition of traffic and hourly variation of traffic volume for mid
block locations are presented in Annexure 4.6 and 4.7.
Table 4.14 Total Daily Traffic, Peak Hour Traffic and Directional Distribution of Traffic at Mid-Block Locations
Table 4.15 Daily Traffic Composition (16 Hours) At Mid Block Locations
Composition (%)
S. Other Fast Slow
Name of Location Car/ Goods
No. Bus Moving
Jeep TW Auto Vehicle
Vehicle
1 Vidya Path between Sec-14&15 31.68 42.21 7.36 0.62 1.13 17.00
2 Sarovar Path between Sec-18&19 26.39 45.02 7.98 1.38 2.03 17.20
3 Chandi Path between Sec-27 & Sec-28 35.93 45.04 2.61 1.99 4.34 10.09
4 Vidya path between Sec-37&38 34.13 42.85 4.83 1.02 1.44 15.74
5 Udyan Path between sec-36&37 34.43 45.08 2.31 1.08 1.50 15.60
6 Sarovar Path Sec-33,34 25.92 48.78 7.05 1.05 1.70 15.49
7 Sukhna Path between Sec -32,33 24.10 47.93 6.39 0.87 1.57 19.14
8 Chandi Path Sec -31,32 36.15 45.42 2.42 1.89 4.81 9.31
9 Himalaya Path Sec -51,52 47.14 37.76 2.74 2.68 4.45 5.24
10 Himalya Path Sec -77 & 78 Mohali 47.64 38.17 3.03 2.36 3.62 5.18
11 Between Sec-10 and Sec-15 (Panchkula) 37.85 42.24 3.16 1.18 1.04 14.54
Between Sec-5 & Sec-6 (Nr. General
12
Hospital, Panchkula) 47.47 31.05 3.28 1.47 2.41 14.32
13 Between Sec 11 & 15 (Madhya Marg) 23.71 51.28 7.83 1.25 1.32 14.61
14 Near Sec-1 Shimla Road (Panchkula) 28.21 25.36 7.05 2.21 25.25 11.93
15 NH - 21 Dakshin Marg Check Post 39.59 39.61 3.16 4.26 6.44 6.93
Source: RITES Primary Survey 2008-09
4.5.6.2 Table 4.16 presents peak hour traffic composition at Mid-Block locations. It is
observed that bus traffic share in peak hour is as high as 3.75% at NH - 21 Dakshin
Marg Check Post. Average bus traffic share is about 1.40%. The goods traffic
constitutes 0.56% at Vidya Path between Sec-14&15 to 34.25% Near Sec-1 Shimla
Road (Panchkula). Average goods traffic is about 3.93%. Similarly, the share of slow
moving passenger traffic varies from 5.59% at Himalaya Path Sec -77 & 78 Mohali to
25.89% at Sarovar Path between Sec-18&19. On an average, slow moving passenger
RITES LTD. Page 15 of 25
Preparation of Comprehensive Mobility Plan for Chandigarh Urban Complex
DRAFT FINAL REPORT – July 2009 Chapter 4 – Traffic Characteristics
vehicles have share of about 14.40%. The share of fast passenger traffic varies from
54.80% Near Sec-1 Shimla Road (Panchkula) to 89.79% at Himalaya Path Sec -77 &
78 Mohali with an average of about 80.27% fast passenger traffic. Peak hour varies
from 0830 Hrs to 1100 Hrs (Morning) and 1715 Hrs to 1915 Hrs (Evening).
12 Between Sec-5 & Sec-6 (Nr. General Hospital, Panchkula) 8.45-9.45 79.20 1.31 2.02 17.47
16:45-17:45 78.86 1.44 2.42 17.27
Between Sec 11 & 15 (Madhya Marg) 9.00-10.00 82.69 0.81 0.74 15.76
13 17:15-18:15 82.84 1.33 1.72 14.10
Near Sec-1 Shimla Road (Panchkula) 9.45-10.45 54.80 1.67 34.25 9.29
14 17:45-18:45 60.58 1.75 20.85 16.82
NH - 21 Dakshin Marg Check Post 9.45-10.45 82.53 3.75 5.41 8.32
15 18:15-19:15 82.39 3.64 5.72 8.25
Source: RITES Primary Survey 2008 – 09
4.5.7.1 Average occupancy of fast moving passenger vehicles is presented in Table 4.17. Bus
occupancy varies from 31 to 49 and averages out at 38. Average occupancy for cars,
two wheelers and auto rickshaws, is about 2.07, 1.33, and 3.9 respectively. The mini
buses have an average occupancy of 15.5.
Average Occupancy
Loc. Two Bus Mini
Name of Locations Auto
no. Car Jeep Van Whlr. Bus
4.5.7.2 Daily passenger trips at mid-block are presented in Table 4.18. It is observed that the
daily passenger trips at different locations varies from 43,687 trips Between Sec-5 &
Sec-6 (Nr. General Hospital) to 1,93,840 trips at Himalaya Path Sec -51,52. Roads
having more than 1 lakh passenger trips are Himalaya Path Sec -77 & 78 Mohali,
Sarovar Path between Sector 33 & 34 and NH - 21 Dakshin Marg Check Post.
4.5.7.3 Roads having more than 20 thousand bus passenger trips are Chandi Path, Himalaya
Path, between sector 10&15 road in Panchkula Shimla road near Sector 1 and
Dakshin Marg
4.5.7.4 Peak Hour passenger trips at Mid-Block are presented in Table 4.19. It is observed
that the peak hour passenger trips at different location varies from 3991 trips at
Between Sec-5 & Sec-6 (Nr. General Hospital) to 15,034 trips at Himalaya Path Sec -
51,52. Roads having bus passengers trips more than 2000 during peak hour are
Between Sec-10 and Sec-15 (Panchkula), Near Sec-1 Shimla Road (Panchkula),
Sector 5& 6 (Near General Hospital) Himalaya Path Sec -77 & 78 Mohali and NH -
21 Dakshin Marg Check Post.
The peak hour traffic at the various intersection locations is presented in Table 4.22.
The morning peak hour volume varies from 3665 PCUs (4679 vehicles) at Rotary
Near Sec -47 (Poorvi Marg) to 12,653 PCUs (14238 vehicles) at Chandigarh Railway
Station Intersection and evening peak hour volume varies from 4202 PCUs (4651
vehicles) Near Chandigarh Housing Board to 14,769 PCU’s (14,111 vehicles) at
Madhya Marg NearTimber Market. Peak Hour Factor is observed to be 7% to 11%.
At most places peak hour factor is 8% to 9%. Morning peak hour is varying during
0830AM to 1030AM and evening peak hour during 1730PM to 1930PM.
4.6.4 The modewise composition and hourly variation of traffic at intersection locations are
presented as Annexure 4.8 and Annexure 4.9. Annexure 4.10 shows the morning
and evening peak directional flows at 20 surveyed intersections.
Table 4.22 Total Daily Traffic, Peak Hour Traffic and Directional Distribution at Intersection Locations
1 Near Chandigarh Housing Board 54378 49248 5200 9.56 4603 9.34 4651 8.55 4202 8.53
2 Cricket Stadium (Rotary) 89910 77762 7972 8.86 7350 9.45 7930 8.82 6833 8.79
3 Rotary Of Dakshin Marg and Jan Marg 87340 74839 6837 7.82 5885 7.86 9693 11.1 7830 10.46
4 Sector-62 Mohali Bus Stand 83340 69154 6820 8.18 5550 8.02 9033 10.84 7120 10.30
5 Sector -43 Chandigarh I.S.B.T. 103075 81273 10458 10.15 7914 9.73 9812 9.51 7547 9.29
6 Bhakra Colony Chowk 108602 90378 8544 7.86 6982 7.72 9752 8.98 7887 8.73
7 Aroma Hotel Chowk 101414 86971 8223 8.10 7015 8.06 9462 9.33 8017 9.22
8 Sec -17 ISBT Chandigarh 114156 97872 8250 7.22 7141 7.29 11725 10.27 9540 9.75
9 K.C. Cinema chowk 120030 99972 11225 9.35 8859 8.86 10075 8.39 8474 8.48
10 Rotary Of Madhya Marg and Sukhna Path 90582 77383 8432 9.30 7028 9.08 8047 8.88 6705 8.66
11 Rotary of Udyog Path & Sukhna Path 85931 73054 6592 7.67 5382 7.36 6439 7.49 5525 7.56
12 Rotary of Dakshin Marg & Sukhna Path 116794 99903 10430 8.93 8627 8.63 11645 9.97 9929 9.94
13 Sirhind chowk near Sector-51 58626 54973 6299 10.74 5216 9.48 5166 8.81 4649 8.46
14 Rotary on Sukhna Path Sector -49&50 86356 75136 7898 9.14 6072 8.08 8563 9.91 7484 9.96
15 Rotary Near Sec -47 (Poorvi Marg) 54262 47917 4679 8.62 3665 7.64 4912 9.05 4455 9.30
16 Rotary of Dakshin Marg and Poorvi Marg
Near sector-31 (Tribune Chowk) 143170 135805 12825 8.95 11198 8.24 13251 9.25 12361 9.10
17 Madhya Marg NearTimber Market 145157 143123 13334 9.18 11981 8.37 14111 9.72 14769 10.32
18 Chandigarh Railway Station Intersection 141366 133143 14238 10.07 12653 9.50 12543 8.87 11600 8.71
19 Housing Board Chowk 148481 133499 12399 8.35 10665 7.98 14285 9.62 12388 9.28
20 Sector-04 Panchkula ISBT 59147 51754 5883 9.94 4976 9.61 5492 9.28 4594 8.88
Source: RITES Primary Survey 2008-09
Composition (%)
Loc Slow
Name of Location Car/ Good
.no TW Auto Bus Moving
Jeep Vehicle
Vehicle
1 Near Chandigarh Housing Board 43.64 28.89 8.30 1.86 0.97 16.34
2 Cricket Stadium (Rotary) 27.39 40.23 9.26 2.70 1.14 19.28
3 Rotary Of Dakshin Marg and Jan Marg 34.31 39.50 8.00 1.69 1.44 15.06
4 Sector-62 Mohali Bus Stand 35.65 39.31 7.50 1.13 1.76 14.65
5 Sector -43 Chandigarh I.S.B.T. 32.90 41.78 4.47 0.79 0.60 19.46
6 Bhakra Colony Chowk 28.18 33.95 7.78 2.26 0.47 27.36
7 Aroma Hotel Chowk 25.79 40.34 8.22 2.07 0.50 23.08
8 Sec -17 ISBT Chandigarh 28.32 40.52 10.19 2.19 0.64 18.14
9 K.C. Cinema chowk 34.59 32.75 7.23 0.86 1.41 23.16
10 Rotary Of Madhya Marg and Sukhna Path 27.91 39.27 10.83 1.61 1.37 19.01
11 Rotary of Udyog Path & Sukhna Path 30.34 36.99 5.67 1.64 2.42 22.94
12 Rotary of Dakshin Marg & Sukhna Path 34.62 37.64 7.07 1.67 1.82 17.18
13 Sirhind chowk near Sector-51 36.66 34.55 3.42 2.66 5.48 17.23
14 Rotary on Sukhna Path Sector -49&50 32.26 39.06 4.60 2.09 3.92 18.07
15 Rotary Near Sec -47 (Poorvi Marg) 26.71 40.87 2.51 1.74 6.81 21.36
Rotary of Dakshin Marg and Poorvi Marg Near sector-
16 31(Tribune Chowk) 31.08 36.44 3.78 2.52 10.17 16.01
17 Madhya Marg NearTimber Market 32.00 29.57 6.27 1.44 7.59 23.13
18 Chandigarh Railway Station Intersection 34.68 34.98 4.96 1.56 7.03 16.79
19 Housing Board Chowk 42.36 35.30 3.27 1.77 4.27 13.03
20 Sector-04 Panchkula ISBT 37.18 34.11 3.55 3.06 1.84 20.26
Source: RITES Primary Survey 2008-09
4.6.5.2 Table 4.24 presents peak hour traffic composition at intersection locations. It is
observed that bus traffic share in peak hour is as high as 4.1% at Cricket Stadium
Rotary. Average bus traffic share is about 1.6%. The goods traffic constitutes 0.3%
at Bhakra Colony rotary to 11% at Timber Market. Average goods traffic is about
2.5%. Similarly, the share of slow moving passenger traffic varies from 14% at
Kisan Bhawan Rotary to 31% at Bhakra Colony (Rotary). On an average, slow
moving passenger vehicles have share of about 21%. The share of fast passenger
traffic varies from 63% at Timber Market Chowk to 83% at Kisan Bhawan Chowk,
Matka Chowk and Phase 7 Mohali Chowk with an average of about 75% fast
passenger traffic.
Rotary Of Dakshin Marg and Jan Marg 0930 - 1030 77.39 1.70 1.04 19.87
3 1745 - 1845 82.70 1.23 1.16 14.92
Sector-62 Mohali Bus Stand 0930 - 1030 82.87 0.79 1.15 15.19
4 1800 - 1900 78.68 0.73 1.37 19.22
Sector -43 Chandigarh I.S.B.T. 0915 - 1015 75.25 0.58 0.47 23.70
5 1730 - 1830 77.01 0.68 0.39 21.92
Sec -17 ISBT Chandigarh 1030 - 1130 79.53 2.52 0.46 17.48
8 1730 - 1830 79.70 1.58 0.43 18.29
K.C. Cinema chowk 0915 - 1015 74.57 0.53 0.89 24.01
9 1800 - 1900 75.54 0.63 1.24 22.59
0900 - 1000 75.93 1.33 0.75 21.99
10 Rotary Of Madhya Marg and Sukhna Path 1730 - 1830 78.27 1.26 1.55 18.93
0900 - 1000 72.73 1.22 2.25 23.80
11 Rotary of Udyog Path & Sukhna Path 1730 - 1830 73.66 1.66 2.61 22.07
0915 - 1015 79.06 1.40 1.18 18.36
12 Rotary of Dakshin Marg & Sukhna Path 1730 - 1830 78.74 1.37 1.53 18.36
0845 - 0945 73.46 1.76 3.18 21.61
13 Sirhind chowk near Sector-51 1800 - 1900 74.31 1.76 4.01 19.92
0830 - 0930 71.71 1.93 2.17 24.19
14 Rotary on Sukhna Path Sector -49&50 1800 - 1900 72.56 1.60 3.96 21.88
0845 - 0945 67.48 1.68 3.91 26.93
15 Rotary Near Sec -47 (Poorvi Marg) 1730 - 1830 66.23 1.67 7.74 24.37
Rotary of Dakshin Marg and Poorvi Marg Near sector- 0915 - 1015 70.85 2.20 7.03 19.92
16 31(Tribune Chowk) 1730 - 1830 71.44 1.96 9.11 17.49
0900 - 1000 67.95 1.22 3.94 26.89
17 Madhya Marg NearTimber Market 1830 - 1930 63.89 1.52 10.80 23.79
0915 - 1015 76.85 1.02 3.88 18.24
18 Chandigarh Railway Station Intersection 1830 - 1930 72.27 1.07 6.29 20.37
0830 - 0930 75.72 1.56 2.67 20.04
19 Housing Board Chowk 1730 - 1830 80.27 1.78 3.73 14.21
0845 - 0945 71.18 2.75 0.99 25.08
20 Sector-04 Panchkula ISBT 1745 - 1845 76.91 2.04 1.17 19.88
Source: RITES Primary Survey 2008-09
4.7.1 Pedestrians form a major proportion of commuters. Not only trips are conducted by
walk in its entirety but every public transport trip will also have component of
walk at its both ends. Though they are short distance travelers, they are spread all
over the city. As facilities furnished for them are encroached upon by vendors or
for road space, they have to spill on roads. These contribute to accidents also. One
alternative for their facility and controlling their spill on roads is to provide good
footpath with railings covering about two meters width on either side of the road
with openings at desired crossing points. Table 4.25 below shows the max PV^2
values at 10 critical junctions in study area. It is observed that the all the location
has observed PV^2 more than 2 X 10^8. As per IRC guidelines grade separation
facilities need to be provided for pedestrians. It is assumed that after coming up of
the MRT system the pedestrian movement across roads will be taken by the grade
separated facilities proposed to be provided at Metro and BRT stations and at grade
pedestrian facilities at all junctions. The choice between lift/escalator operated
underpasses will depend upon the specific site conditions. Pedestrian count survey
location is shown ion Figure 4.6 and survey proforma as Annexure 4.11.
Table 4.26 below shows V/C ratios at various major roads in study area. It can be
seen from table that most of the roads have V/C ratios for year 2009 less than 1.0
except two corridors namely Madhya Marg and Udyog Path.
4.9 CONCLUSIONS
4.9.1 Overall daily traffic desire of Inter – city traffic (passenger and freight)indicates
the need of bypass link between (Refer Figure 4.2 and Figure 4.3)
• Kharar and Derabassi
• Derabassi and Parwanu
• Derabassi and Baddi
• Parwanu and Baddi
4.9.2 Mid Block counts indicates at present V/C ratio are less than one on most of the
roads except Madhya Marg and Udyog Path. But V/C needs to be stabilized at this
point only by intervention of a citywide good public mass transport system for
Chandigarh Urban Complex.
4.9.3 Intersection Counts indicates high volume of traffic approaching these junctions as
a result the waiting time is increasing on them. Many of these junctions need
immediate grade separation and improvement to reduce the delays at junctions.
Some of the junctions which needs immediate improvement are K.C Cinema
Chowk (Press Chowk), Tribune Chowk, Transport Nagar Chowk, Railway Station
Chowk, Housing Board Chowk.
4.9.4 Traffic surveys shows growing traffic interaction between Chandigarh Urban
Complex and towns such as Kharar, Derabassi, Baddi, Kalka etc. Therefore proper
and adequate transport linkages need to be developed to cater to the future traffic
needs.
CHAPTER- 5
PARKING CHARACTERISTICS
5.1 INTRODUCTION
Table 5.2 gives the parking duration of various modes at parking survey locations
slected across the study area. Long term parking is observed mainly at parking lots
near offices, banks and hotels. This is mainly due to fact that employees park their
vehicles in the morning and go to their work place and pick them up in the evening at
the time of return. At most other locations short term parking (upto 4 hrs) is
significant due to shopping areas.
Parking demand at a location is the number of vehicles parked over a period at time.
Parking demand and parking supply at various locations are given in Table 5.3. The
table indicates that parking demand is very high at most locations and parking
demand outstrips supply at most locations. Peak parking demand for Sector 17 is
about 10074 ECS whereas the supply is only 6658 ECS. Thus there is an unful filled
demand of approx 3400 ECS required to be met through multilevel parking.
Parking Index is the ratio of peak hour parking accumulation to parking supply of
spaces. Table 5.4 gives the Parking Index at various locations. Parking indices are
more than 1 at most of the survey locations. Average parking index for Sector 17 is
1.7.
Parking Turnover is the number of times a parking space is used during a day. Parking
turnover at various locations is given in Table 5.4. At most of the locations where
parking is long term, parking turnover is less. At other locations, (like near Hotel Park
View PK5, Near High Court PK6 and between Telephone Bhawan and GPO building
PK32) parking turnover is high indicating short term parking duration. Average
parking turnover in Sector 17 is 4.5.
5.7 CONCLUSIONS
Duration (Hours)
0--2 2--4 4--6 6--8 >8
S.No Location Landmark Mode Total
Long
Short Term Medium Term
Term
Car 183 9 26 17 98 333
% 54.95 2.70 7.81 5.11 29.43 100.00
1 PK - 1 Infront of Secretriat Haryana near ISBT -17
2-Whlr. - - - - - -
% - - - - - -
Car - - - - - -
Infront of Main Gate of Police Station To near Hotel Park % - - - - - -
2 PK - 2
View (On Road Parking) 2-Whlr. 383 102 116 94 550 1245
% 30.76 8.19 9.32 7.55 44.18 100.00
Car - - - - - -
% - - - - - -
3 PK - 3 Infront of High Court
2-Whlr. 379 148 114 151 105 897
% 42.25 16.50 12.71 16.83 11.71 100.00
Car 44 28 32 64 91 259
% 16.99 10.81 12.36 24.71 35.14 100.00
4 PK - 4 Infront of High Court
2-Whlr. 259 69 58 63 61 510
% 50.78 13.53 11.37 12.35 11.96 100.00
Car 77 19 3 0 0 99
Infront of Main Gate of Police Station To near Hotel Park % 77.78 19.19 3.03 0.00 0.00 100.00
5 PK - 5
View (On Road Parking) 2-Whlr. 469 68 8 1 0 546
% 85.90 12.45 1.47 0.18 0.00 100.00
Car 113 22 3 0 0 138
Infront of Main Gate of Police Station To Main Gate of % 81.88 15.94 2.17 0.00 0.00 100.00
6 PK - 6
High Court (On Road Parking) 2-Whlr. 334 29 16 5 0 384
% 86.98 7.55 4.17 1.30 0.00 100.00
7 PK - 7 Infront of PT Drill Ground & near High Court (On Road Car - - - - - -
Parking) % - - - - - -
Duration (Hours)
0--2 2--4 4--6 6--8 >8
S.No Location Landmark Mode Total
Long
Short Term Medium Term
Term
2-Whlr. 142 20 22 23 27 234
% 60.68 8.55 9.40 9.83 11.54 100.00
Car 342 42 8 - - 392
% 87.24 10.71 2.04 0.00 0.00 100.00
8 PK - 8 Infront of High Court (On Road Parking)
2-Whlr. 19 0 1 1 0 21
% 90.48 0.00 4.76 4.76 0.00 100.00
Car 140 41 33 18 17 249
% 56.22 16.47 13.25 7.23 6.83 100.00
9 PK - 9 Near Backside of Police Station Sec. -17
2-Whlr. - - - - - -
% - - - - - -
Car 83 23 24 34 34 198
% 41.92 11.62 12.12 17.17 17.17 100.00
10 PK - 10 Infront of Post Master General Office
2-Whlr. 252 71 47 38 95 503
% 50.10 14.12 9.34 7.55 18.89 100.00
Car 406 103 57 37 49 652
% 62.27 15.80 8.74 5.67 7.52 100.00
11 PK - 11 Backside of Micky Chhabra Shop Sec. -17E, (SCO-5-6)
2-Whlr. 290 100 81 57 119 647
% 44.82 15.46 12.52 8.81 18.39 100.00
Car - - - - - -
% - - - - - -
12 PK - 12 Backside of Giordano Shop Sec. -17E,
2-Whlr. 459 106 57 57 83 762
% 60.24 13.91 7.48 7.48 10.89 100.00
Car 129 21 18 21 21 210
Near Neelam Cinema and infront of B.R. Tailor Sec.-17E % 61.43 10.00 8.57 10.00 10.00 100.00
13 PK - 13 & PK - 14
(SCO-18) 2-Whlr. 133 62 45 48 67 355
% 37.46 17.46 12.68 13.52 18.87 100.00
14 PK - 15 Infront of Student Tailor Sec.-17E (SCO-21) Car 205 56 28 32 48 369
% 55.56 15.18 7.59 8.67 13.01 100.00
Duration (Hours)
0--2 2--4 4--6 6--8 >8
S.No Location Landmark Mode Total
Long
Short Term Medium Term
Term
2-Whlr. 154 62 57 52 100 425
% 36.24 14.59 13.41 12.24 23.53 100.00
Car - - - - - -
% - - - - - -
15 PK - 16 Infront of Jagat Singh & Sons Shop Sec.-17E
2-Whlr. 363 128 103 138 149 881
% 41.20 14.53 11.69 15.66 16.91 100.00
Car 402 85 74 82 84 727
% 55.30 11.69 10.18 11.28 11.55 100.00
16 PK - 17 Opposite of Accountant General Punjab Office
2-Whlr. 266 161 152 168 296 1043
% 25.50 15.44 14.57 16.11 28.38 100.00
Car 1512 400 242 259 214 2627
% 57.56 15.23 9.21 9.86 8.15 100.00
17 PK - 18 Infront of Sagar Ratna Restaurant Sec.-17E
2-Whlr. 389 112 120 127 224 972
% 40.02 11.52 12.35 13.07 23.05 100.00
Car 890 113 61 65 95 1224
Infront of Capital Book Depot Sec.-17E & State Bank of % 72.71 9.23 4.98 5.31 7.76 100.00
18 PK - 19
Bikaner & jaipur Sec. 17D (SCO-106-108) 2-Whlr. 458 63 60 76 125 782
% 58.57 8.06 7.67 9.72 15.98 100.00
Car 949 229 103 107 170 1558
Infront of Oriental Insurance Company Sec. 17D (SCO- % 60.91 14.70 6.61 6.87 10.91 100.00
19 PK - 20
109-110-111) 2-Whlr. 341 137 115 127 442 1162
% 29.35 11.79 9.90 10.93 38.04 100.00
Car - - - - - -
% - - - - - -
20 PK - 21 Near Social Promoter Booth
2-Whlr. 375 144 104 107 124 854
% 43.91 16.86 12.18 12.53 14.52 100.00
21 PK - 22 Infront of Canara Bank Sec.-17C (SCO-114-115) & Sidhu Car 1110 307 178 166 234 1995
Travels Sec. 17C (SCO-123-124) % 55.64 15.39 8.92 8.32 11.73 100.00
Duration (Hours)
0--2 2--4 4--6 6--8 >8
S.No Location Landmark Mode Total
Long
Short Term Medium Term
Term
2-Whlr. 546 227 217 262 554 1806
% 30.23 12.57 12.02 14.51 30.68 100.00
Car 137 48 46 63 57 351
% 39.031 13.675 13.105 17.949 16.239 100.000
22 PK - 23 Infront of Telephone Bhawan
2-Whlr. 32 21 24 31 30 138
% 23.19 15.22 17.39 22.46 21.74 100.00
Car 143 36 11 10 26 226
% 63.27 15.93 4.87 4.42 11.50 100.00
23 PK - 24 Infront of GPO & Speed Post Sec. 17
2-Whlr. 316 50 45 68 106 585
% 54.017 8.547 7.692 11.624 18.120 100.000
Car 40 32 31 30 23 156
Infront of United Bank of India Sec.-17C (SCO-32-33-34) % 25.64 20.51 19.87 19.23 14.74 100.00
24 PK - 25
& near D.C. office 2-Whlr. 225 56 45 46 22 394
% 57.11 14.21 11.42 11.68 5.58 100.00
Car - - - - - -
Infront of National Gallery Sec.-17C & Wine Shop (SCO- % - - - - - -
25 PK - 26
156-158) , near D.C. office 2-Whlr. 613 114 10 0 0 737
% 83.18 15.47 1.36 0.00 0.00 100.00
Car 137 23 38 31 81 310
% 44.19 7.42 12.26 10.00 26.13 100.00
26 PK - 27 Infront of National Gallery Sec.-17C
2-Whlr. - - - - - -
% - - - - - -
Car 133 38 36 23 41 271
% 49.08 14.02 13.28 8.49 15.13 100.00
27 PK - 28 Infront of D.C. Office & near National Gallery Sec.-17C
2-Whlr. 395 128 152 141 225 1041
% 37.94 12.30 14.60 13.54 21.61 100.00
28 PK - 29 Infront of Krishna Carpet Company & Udyog Bhawan Sec.- Car 842 218 199 202 212 1673
17C % 50.33 13.03 11.89 12.07 12.67 100.00
Duration (Hours)
0--2 2--4 4--6 6--8 >8
S.No Location Landmark Mode Total
Long
Short Term Medium Term
Term
2-Whlr. 698 349 307 358 491 2203
% 31.68 15.84 13.94 16.25 22.29 100.00
Car 161 38 15 14 4 232
% 69.40 16.38 6.47 6.03 1.72 100.00
29 PK - 30 Infront of Employees Provident Fund Sec.-17D (SCO- 4-7)
2-Whlr. 41 7 4 3 1 56
% 73.21 12.50 7.14 5.36 1.79 100.00
Car 44 6 5 1 0 56
% 78.57 10.71 8.93 1.79 0.00 100.00
30 PK - 31 Infront of Employees Provident Fund Sec.-17D (SCO- 4-7)
2-Whlr. 332 126 53 31 9 551
% 60.25 22.87 9.62 5.63 1.63 100.00
Car 222 26 24 34 42 348
% 63.79 7.47 6.90 9.77 12.07 100.00
31 PK - 32 Between Telephone Bhawan & GPO Building
2-Whlr. 687 139 219 214 199 1458
% 47.12 9.53 15.02 14.68 13.65 100.00
Car 432 165 99 118 138 952
Infront of New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Sec.-17A (SCO- % 45.38 17.33 10.40 12.39 14.50 100.00
32 PK - 33
36-37) 2-Whlr. 225 82 92 149 175 723
% 31.12 11.34 12.72 20.61 24.20 100.00
Car - - - - - -
% - - - - - -
33 PK - 34 Infront of Income Tex Deptt. Sec.-17A (SCO- 40-41)
2-Whlr. 259 64 23 11 5 362
% 71.55 17.68 6.35 3.04 1.38 100.00
Car - - - - - -
% - - - - - -
34 PK - 35 Infront of Haryana Financial Corporation Sec.-17C
2-Whlr. 90 30 34 21 124 299
% 30.10 10.03 11.37 7.02 41.47 100.00
35 PK - 36 Infront of Jeevan Prakash Building & PNB Bank Sec.-17B Car 85 47 27 27 39 225
% 37.78 20.89 12.00 12.00 17.33 100.00
Duration (Hours)
0--2 2--4 4--6 6--8 >8
S.No Location Landmark Mode Total
Long
Short Term Medium Term
Term
2-Whlr. 205 42 32 49 87 415
% 49.40 10.12 7.71 11.81 20.96 100.00
Car 740 191 161 220 230 1542
Infront of Haryana Co-operative Apex Bank Sec.-17B % 47.99 12.39 10.44 14.27 14.92 100.00
36 PK - 37
(SCO- 78-80) & Punjab & Sindh Bank (SCO-84-91) 2-Whlr. 949 319 371 448 459 2546
% 37.27 12.53 14.57 17.60 18.03 100.00
Car 139 47 38 28 34 286
Infront of SBI Bank Administrative Office Sec.-17B (SCO- % 48.60 16.43 13.29 9.79 11.89 100.00
37 PK - 38
107-108) 2-Whlr. 230 62 52 56 51 451
% 51.00 13.75 11.53 12.42 11.31 100.00
Car 19 23 15 43 56 156
% 12.18 14.74 9.62 27.56 35.90 100.00
38 PK - 39 Infront of SBI Life Insurance Sec.-17B (SCO- 109-110)
2-Whlr. 59 27 20 45 50 201
% 29.35 13.43 9.95 22.39 24.88 100.00
Car 294 105 91 80 152 722
% 40.72 14.54 12.60 11.08 21.05 100.00
39 PK - 40 Near PNB High Value Branch Sec.-17B (SCO- 125-127)
2-Whlr. 370 192 128 192 277 1159
% 31.92 16.57 11.04 16.57 23.90 100.00
Car 339 105 54 43 61 602
% 56.31 17.44 8.97 7.14 10.13 100.00
40 PK - 41 Near Wine Shop, Sec.-17A (SCO- 68-70)
2-Whlr. 378 140 102 115 181 916
% 41.266 15.284 11.135 12.555 19.760 100.000
Source: RITES Primary Survey 2008 – 09
Parking Parking
S.No Location Direction Car 2-Whlr Demand (ECS) Supply (ECS)
1 PK - 1 Infront of Secretriat Haryana near ISBT -17 333 - 333 101
2 PK - 2 Infront of Fire Station & Backside ISBT -17 - 1245 311 87
3 PK - 3 Infront of High Court - 897 224 55
4 PK - 4 Infront of High Court 259 510 387 190
Infront of Main Gate of Police Station To near Hotel Park
99 546 236 20
5 PK - 5 View (On Road Parking)
Infront of Main Gate of Police Station To Main Gate of
138 384 234 25
6 PK - 6 High Court (On Road Parking)
Infront of PT Drill Ground & near High Court (On Road
- 234 59 13
7 PK - 7 Parking)
8 PK - 8 Infront of High Court (On Road Parking) 392 21 397 54
9 PK - 9 Near Backside of Police Station Sec. -17 249 0 249 103
10 PK - 10 Infront of Post Master General Office 198 503 324 104
11 PK - 11 Backside of Micky Chhabra Shop Sec. -17E, (SCO-5-6) 652 647 814 231
12 PK - 12 Backside of Giordano Shop Sec. -17E, - 762 191 22
Near Neelam Cinema and infront of B.R. Tailor Sec.-17E
210 355 299 92
13 PK - 13 & PK - 14 (SCO-18)
14 PK - 15 Infront of Student Tailor Sec.-17E (SCO-21) 369 425 475 190
15 PK - 16 Infront of Jagat Singh & Sons Shop Sec.-17E - 881 220 63
16 PK - 17 Opposite of Accountant General Punjab Office 727 1043 988 270
17 PK - 18 Infront of Sagar Ratna Restaurant Sec.-17E 2627 972 2870 573
Infront of Capital Book Depot Sec.-17E & State Bank of
1224 782 1420 196
18 PK - 19 Bikaner & jaipur Sec. 17D (SCO-106-108)
Infront of Oriental Insurance Company Sec. 17D (SCO-
1558 1162 1849 550
19 PK - 20 109-110-111)
20 PK - 21 Near Social Promoter Booth - 854 214 64
21 PK - 22 Infront of Canara Bank Sec.-17C (SCO-114-115) & Sidhu 1995 1806 2447 528
Parking Parking
S.No Location Direction Car 2-Whlr Demand (ECS) Supply (ECS)
Travels Sec. 17C (SCO-123-124)
22 PK - 23 Infront of Telephone Bhawan 351 138 386 223
23 PK - 24 Infront of GPO & Speed Post Sec. 17 226 585 372 98
Infront of United Bank of India Sec.-17C (SCO-32-33-34)
156 394 255 47
24 PK - 25 & near D.C. office
Infront of National Gallery Sec.-17C & Wine Shop (SCO-
- 737 184 41
25 PK - 26 156-158) , near D.C. office
26 PK - 27 Infront of National Gallery Sec.-17C 310 - 310 119
27 PK - 28 Infront of D.C. Office & near National Gallery Sec.-17C 271 1041 531 93
Infront of Krishna Carpet Company & Udyog Bhawan
1673 2203 2224 296
28 PK - 29 Sec.-17C
29 PK - 30 Infront of Employees Provident Fund Sec.-17D (SCO- 4-7) 232 56 246 72
30 PK - 31 Infront of Employees Provident Fund Sec.-17D (SCO- 4-7) 56 551 194 43
31 PK - 32 Between Telephone Bhawan & GPO Building 348 1458 713 70
Infront of New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Sec.-17A (SCO-
952 723 1133 445
32 PK - 33 36-37)
33 PK - 34 Infront of Income Tex Deptt. Sec.-17A (SCO- 40-41) - 362 91 22
34 PK - 35 Infront of Haryana Financial Corporation Sec.-17C - 299 75 14
35 PK - 36 Infront of Jeevan Prakash Building & PNB Bank Sec.-17B 225 415 329 81
Infront of Haryana Co-operative Apex Bank Sec.-17B
1542 2546 2179 731
36 PK - 37 (SCO- 78-80) & Punjab & Sindh Bank (SCO-84-91)
Infront of SBI Bank Administrative Office Sec.-17B
286 451 399 180
37 PK - 38 (SCO- 107-108)
38 PK - 39 Infront of SBI Life Insurance Sec.-17B (SCO- 109-110) 156 201 206 96
39 PK - 40 Near PNB High Value Branch Sec.-17B (SCO- 125-127) 722 1159 1012 289
40 PK - 41 Near Wine Shop, Sec.-17A (SCO- 68-70) 602 916 831 168
Source: RITES Primary Survey 2008 – 09
CHAPTER- 6
INTER-CITY PUBLIC TRANSPORT
CHARACTERISTICS
6.1 PUBLIC TRANSPORT SURVEYS
The following public transport surveys were conducted as part of the study:
1 Rail Passenger surveys
2 Bus Passenger surveys
3 Air Passenger surveys
The data collected through the field surveys has been analysed to assess the various
public transport characteristics of commuters for different modes. The survey
proforma are given as Annexure 6.1, 6.1A, 6.1B and 6.1C
6.2.1 The Rail Passenger Surveys were conducted to ascertain travel characteristics of
railway passengers. The survey was administered by counting the number of
passengers boarding and alighting the trains along with origin–destination (O-D)
survey on random sampling basis by interviewing passengers waiting to board the
train at railway stations. This survey was conducted at 4 railway stations within the
study area for a period of 24 hours. The information included:
6.2.2 It is observed from the analysis of rail terminal survey that Chandigrah Railway
station caters to the maximum number of passengers/other users (28138) followed by
Kalka Railway Station (6125). Mohali Railway station is handling the minimum
number of passengers (136) among all the 4 railway stations surveyed in study area.
The daily passenger volume along with the peak hour factor at the surveyed railway
stations are given in Table 6.1. The table indicates that peak hour factors varies from
11.55 (Chandigarh railway station) to 54.41 (Mohali railway station).
6.2.3 It is observed from Table 6.2 that the share of service & business purpose trips is
about 59% followed by about 34% for social & other purposes. The educational trips
contribute only 6%.
6.2.4 Table 6.3 shows that about 35% passengers are dispersing through buses. Share of
passenger dispersal by auto rickshaw is about 22%.
6.2.5 It is observed from Table 6.4 and Table 6.5 that about 61% of total passengers take
upto 30 minute to reach station from their initial origins and about 51% of total
passengers take upto 30 minute to reach their final destinations.
Table 6.4 Distribution of Boarding Passengers by Travel Time Taken to Reach Railway Station
from Initial Origin
S. no Travel Time Percentage (%)
1 <=15 30.04
2 >15-<=30 31.15
3 >30-<=45 8.88
4 >45-<=60 7.34
5 >60.-<=90 2.92
6 >90-<=150 5.16
7 >150-<=210 2.76
8 >210 11.75
Total 100.00
Source: RITES Primary Survey 2008 – 09
6.2.6 It is observed from Table 6.6 and Table 6.7 that about 50% of total passengers spend
upto Rs 10/- to reach station from their initial origins or to reach their final
destinations.
Table 6.6 Distribution of Boarding Passengers by Travel Cost to reach Railway Station
from Initial Origin
6.3.1 The OD data collected and analysed at the 10 major Inter State Bus Terminus (ISBT)
and 20 other bus terminals in study area indicates Sector 17 Chandigarh, Sector 43
Chandigarh, Kharar, Derabassi followed by others (Table 6.8). At Zirakpur bus
terminal the arrival and departure of buses is high but at the same time passenger flow
(boarding/alighting) is low as compared to other bus terminals where buses generally
halt for some time.
The analysis further indicates that about 2.5 lakh commuters use the intercity bus
terminals daily (for 16hrs).
Table 6.8 Daily Arrival/Departure at Major Interstate Bus Terminals
Daily Arrival Daily Departure Total
Passengers Passengers
S.no Terminal Name
Buses Inflow Buses Outflow Buses Passenger
(Boarding) (Alighting)
1 Baddi Bus Terminal 441 4817 441 5040 882 9857
Dera Bassi Bus
2 623 12189 630 9876 1253 22065
Terminal
3 Kalka Bus Terminal 178 3511 168 3326 346 6837
6.3.2 It is observed from Table 6.9 that 50% of passengers use buses for their work
purpose and 33% of passengers uses it for social and other purposes.
6.3.3 Table 6.10 shows that about 76% passengers are dispersing through city buses.
Share of passenger dispersal by auto rickshaw/ shared auto rickshaw is about 12%.
This indicates that intercity buses are being used by lower and lower middle class.
Table 6.10 Mode wise Passenger Dispersal Distribution
S. no Mode Percentage (%)
1 Car/Van/Jeep 0.59
2 Two Wheeler 1.49
3 Auto Rickshaw 2.36
4 Shared Auto Rickshaw 9.4
5 Bus 76.21
6 Cycle 0.04
7 Cycle Rickshaw 0.44
8 Walk 9.47
Total 100.00
Source: RITES Primary Survey 2008 – 09
6.3.4 It is observed from Table 6.11 and Table 6.12 that about 50% of total passengers take
upto 30 minute to reach terminal from their initial origins and about 65% of total
passengers take upto 30 minute to reach their final destinations.
Table 6.11 Distribution of Boarding Passengers by Travel Time Taken to Reach Terminal from
Initial Origin
6.3.5 It is observed from Table 6.13 and Table 6.14 that about 63% of total passengers
spend upto Rs 10/- to reach Terminal from their initial origins and 70% of total
passengers spend upto Rs 10/- to reach their final destinations.
Table 6.13 Distribution of Boarding Passengers by Travel Cost to reach terminal from
Initial Origin
6.3.6 It is observed from Table 6.15 and Table 6.16 that about 38% of total boarding
passengers at and 42% of total alighting passengers at terminals perform their trips on
daily basis.
The analysis further indicates that about 0.24 lakh commuters use the intercity bus
terminals daily (for 16hrs).
6.4.2 It is observed from Table 6.18 that 61% of passengers use buses for their work
purpose and 23% of passengers uses it for social and other purposes at proxy
terminals.
6.4.3 It is observed from Table 6.19 that about 69% of total passengers take upto 30 minute
to reach proxy bus stop from their initial origins.
Table 6.19 Distribution of Boarding Passengers by Travel Time Taken to Reach Proxy Bus Stop
from Initial Origin
S. no Travel Time Percentage (%)
1 <=15 42.77
2 >15-<=30 26.26
3 >30-<=45 9.00
4 >45-<=60 7.21
5 >60.-<=90 7.88
6 >90-<=150 3.72
7 >150-<=210 2.01
8 >210 1.14
Total 100.00
Source: RITES Primary Survey 2008 – 09
6.4.4 It is observed from Table 6.20 about 72% of total passengers spend upto Rs 10/- to
reach proxy bus stop from their initial origins.
Table 6.20 Distribution of Boarding Passengers by Travel Cost to reach Proxy Bus Stop
from Initial Origin
6.4.5 It is observed from Table 6.21 about 56% of total passengers are daily passengers.
6.5.1 The Air Passenger Surveys were conducted to ascertain travel characteristics of air
passengers. The survey was administered by counting the number of passengers
boarding and alighting the trains along with O-D survey on random sampling basis by
interviewing passengers. This survey was conducted at 1 Airport within the study area
for a period of 24 hours. The information included:
6.5.2 It is observed from the table that Chandigrah Airport caters 1993 total passenger per
day. The daily passenger volume along with the peak hour factor at Chandigarh
Airport is given in Table 6.22. The table also shows the peak hour factors and peak
hour passengers.
S.No Name of Airport Total Passengers Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor
Per Day Passenger
1 Chandigarh 1993 220 11.03
Source: RITES Primary Survey 2008 – 09
6.5.3 Table 6.23 shows that 56% of trips are contributed by service and business purpose and
39% of trips are social and other purposes.
6.5.4 Table 6.24 shows that about 90% passengers are dispersing through Cars and Two
wheelers. Share of passenger dispersal by auto rickshaw is only 2%, whereas buses
accounts for merely 1.5% of dispersal trips
Table 6.24 Mode wise Distribution of Airport Passenger Dispersal
S. no Mode Percentage (%)
1 Car 85.03
2 T.W. 4.59
3 Auto 2.21
4 Bus 1.54
5 Walk 0.51
6 Cycle 6.12
Total 100.00
Source: RITES Primary Survey 2008 – 09
6.6 CONCLUSIONS
CHAPTER-7
SOCIO-ECONOMIC & TRAVEL CHARACTERISTICS
7.1.1 Zoning
The objective of the survey is to establish the socio - economic and the travel
characteristics of residents of Chandigarh Urban Complex.
The study area was divided into 176 internal and 14 external zones. The 176 zones
consist of Chandigarh Urban Complex, which include Chandigarh, SAS Nagar
(Mohali) Panchkula and Zirakpur Areas. The list of traffic zones is presented in Table
7.1. The traffic zone map has been shown in Figure 7.1.
Household cum opinion survey on a sample basis was carried out as a part of the
study to get the information spread over the study area. A total of 5175 households
have been drawn from all the traffic zones by random sampling method. Stratification
of the sample was done to cover various income groups. Sample size of household in
each zone is given in Table 7.1.
The survey format covered the socio-economic profile of the household providing
details like household size, education levels, income, vehicle ownership, the
individual trip information of the members of the household, which provides the
details of the trips performed on the previous day, by the household members. The
survey format is given as Annexure 7.1.
The enumerators with minimum graduate qualification were selected and were trained
in-house by RITES experts to carryout the survey. Pilot survey was carried out to
obtain the response from the Households and minor modifications were carried out in
the proforma based on the pilot survey. The pilot survey also helped in the training of
the enumerators.
The survey was carried out after 6 PM on weekdays and during daytime on weekends
so that the head of the household and other members were available.
Table 7.1 List of Traffic Analysis Zones and Household Sample Size
Household Household
Traffic Traffic
Name of the Traffic Zone Sample Name of the Traffic Zone Sample
Zone Zone
Size Size
1 Sector-1 0 39 Sector-39 80
2 Sector-2 5 40 Sector-40 178
3 Sector-3 3 41 Sector-41 132
4 Sector-4 5 42 Sector-42 45
5 Sector-5 2 43 Sector-43 34
6 Sector-6 1 44 Sector-44 67
7 Sector-7 44 45 Sector-45 255
8 Sector-8 21 46 Sector-46 68
9 Sector-9 10 47 Sector-47 26
10 Sector-10 10 48 Sector-48 65
11 Sector-11 13 49 Sector-49 60
12 Sector-12 17 50 Sector-50 54
13 MDC Sector-6 0 51 Sector-51 22
14 Sector-14 22 52 Sector-52 50
15 Sector-15 49 53 Sector-53 76
16 Sector-16 15 54 Sector-54 72
17 Sector-17 1 55 Sector-55 82
18 Sector-18 18 56 Sector-56 68
19 Sector-19 42 57 Sector-57 8
20 Sector-20 86 58 Sector-58 5
21 Sector-21 34 59 Sector-59 59
22 Sector-22 68 60 Sector-60 46
23 Sector-23 52 61 Sector-61 58
24 Sector-24 33 62 SAS Nagar Sector-62 0
25 Sector-25 70 63 SAS Nagar Sector-63 40
26 Sector-26 & Sec-26 E 122 64 SAS Nagar Sector-64 51
27 Sector-27 42 65 SAS Nagar Sector-65 78
28 Sector-28 35 66 SAS Nagar Sector-66 18
29 Sector-29 48 67 SAS Nagar Sector-67 0
30 Sector-30 44 68 SAS Nagar Sector-68 41
31 Sector-31 49 69 SAS Nagar Sector-69 0
32 Sector-32 42 70 SAS Nagar Sector-70 43
33 Sector-33 21 71 SAS Nagar Sector-71 32
34 Sector-34 15 72 SAS Nagar Sector-72 6
35 Sector-35 41 73 SAS Nagar Sector-73 6
36 Sector-36 19 74 SAS Nagar Sector-74 1
37 Sector-37 60 75 SAS Nagar Sector-75 0
38 Sector-38 202 76 SAS Nagar Sector-76 2
Mani majra Rural,Kishangarh,
77 SAS Nagar Sector-77 8 113 Bhagwanpura 17
78 SAS Nagar Sector-78 8 114 Mani Majra 209
Railway Station, Kalagram, Mouli,
79 SAS Nagar Sector-79 0 115 Raipur Kalan, Daria 291
80 SAS Nagar Sector-80 5 116 Industrianl Area Phase-I, Makhan Majra 86
81 SAS Nagar Sector-81 2 117 Industrianl Area Phase-II, Ram Darbar 125
Bahlana, Bari Majra, Airport, Burail ®,
82 SAS Nagar Sector-82 0 118 Hallo Majra 78
83 SAS Nagar Sector-83 0 119 Maloia, Dadu Majra 20
84 SAS Nagar Sector-84 3 120 Panchkula Sector-1 24
85 SAS Nagar Sector-85 0 121 Panchkula Sector-2 12
RITES LTD Page 2 of 16
Comprehensive Mobility Plan for Chandigarh Urban Complex
DRAFT FINAL REPORT – July 2009 Chapter 7 – Socio-Economic & Travel Characteristics
Household Household
Traffic Traffic
Name of the Traffic Zone Sample Name of the Traffic Zone Sample
Zone Zone
Size Size
86 SAS Nagar Sector-86 2 122 Panchkula Sector-3 20
87 SAS Nagar Sector-87 0 123 Panchkula Sector-4 51
88 SAS Nagar Sector-88 0 124 Panchkula Sector-5 2
89 SAS Nagar Sector-89 0 125 Panchkula Sector-6 17
90 SAS Nagar Sector-90 3 126 Panchkula Sector-7 18
91 SAS Nagar Sector-91 0 127 Panchkula Sector-8 16
92 SAS Nagar Sector-92 2 128 Panchkula Sector-9 19
93 SAS Nagar Sector-93 0 129 Panchkula Sector-10 22
94 SAS Nagar Sector-94 0 130 Panchkula Sector-11 15
95 SAS Nagar Sector-95 0 131 Panchkula Sector-12 17
96 SAS Nagar Sector-96 2 132 Panchkula Sector-12 A 21
97 SAS Nagar Sector-97 0 133 Panchkula Sector-14 22
98 SAS Nagar Sector-98 2 134 Panchkula Sector-15 38
99 SAS Nagar Sector-99 0 135 Panchkula Sector-16 19
100 SAS Nagar Sector-100 0 136 Panchkula Sector-17 14
Panchkula Sector-18 & Industrial Area
101 SAS Nagar Sector-101 5 137 Ph-II 74
Panchkula Sector-19 & Industrial Area
102 SAS Nagar Sector-102 0 138 Ph-I 51
103 SAS Nagar Sector-103 0 139 Panchkula Sector-20 25
104 SAS Nagar Sector-104 0 140 Panchkula Sector-21 37
105 SAS Nagar Sector-105 0 141 Panchkula Sector-22 1
106 SAS Nagar Sector-106 0 142 Panchkula Sector-23 4
107 SAS Nagar Sector-107 3 143 Panchkula Sector-24 8
108 Dadu Majra 38 144 Panchkula Sector-25 6
Dhanas, Sarangpur, Gwal
109 Colony 21 145 Panchkula Sector-26 5
Khuda Lahora, Khuda
110 Jassu 15 146 Panchkula Sector-27 5
111 Khuda Ali Sher 14 147 Panchkula Sector-28 5
112 Kaimbwala, Chungia 11 148 Panchkula Sector-29 5
149 Panchkula Sector-30 1 163 Zirakpur (Ward 10+11) 39
150 Panchkula Sector-31 2 164 Zirakpur (Ward 13+14+15) 66
151 Panchkula Sector-32 1 165 Tehsil SAS Nagar Pocket F 0
152 MDC Sector-1 1 166 Tehsil Kharar, Pocket E 0
153 MDC Sector-2 0 167 Kaku Majra, Dharampur, Jagatpur 2
154 MDC Sector-3 0 168 Landiali, Alipur 2
155 MDC Sector-4 19 169 Bakarpur 2
156 MDC Sector-5 21 170 Dialgarh, Nariangarh 0
157 Zirakpur (ward 1+12) 41 171 Matran 2
158 Zirakpur (ward 2+3) 54 172 Shanpura 0
159 Zirakpur (Ward 4+5) 32 173 Siaun 2
160 Zirakpur (Ward 6) 20 174 Ajitgarh colony 0
161 Zirakpur (Ward 7) 10 175 Paton 2
162 Zirakpur (Ward 8+9) 20 176 Kurari 4
7.1.6 There are some traffic zones where there is very little or no population. Therefore,
household surveys have not been done in these traffic zones
The following outputs were derived from the analysis of the Household survey.
Distribution of households according to its family size is presented in Table 7.2 and
Figure 7.2. The table indicates that only 1.39% of the households have 1 member and
also 0.85% of the households belong to the category of households, which have over
11 persons per house hold. Majority of households (60.87%) have between 4 to 6
persons per households. The average household size is 4.46.
Household No. of
S. No. Percentage
by Size Households
1 1 72 1.39
2 2--3 1375 26.57
3 4--6 3150 60.87
4 7--10 534 10.32
5 >11 44 0.85
Total 5175 100.00
Source: RITES Primary Surveys – 2009
7-10
10%
4-6
61% >11
1%
1
1%
2-3
27%
Distribution of households owning vehicles is presented in Table 7.3 to Table 7.6 and
Figure 7.3 to Figure 7.6. Table 7.3 shows that only 3% of Households have no
vehicle.
Table 7.4 indicates that about 43% of the household have atleast one car and nearly
7% households have more than 1 car. Table 7.5 indicates that about 78% of
households have at least 1 scooter/motor cycle. From Table 7.6 it can be observed
that nearly 30% households own at least 1 cycle.
Number of
SI No. Type of Vehicle Percentage
Households
1 No Vehicle 153 2.96
2 Only Car 402 7.77
3 Only 2-Wheeler 1194 23.07
4 Only Cycle 528 10.2
5 Only Auto Rickshaw 11 0.21
6 Car & 2-Wheeler 1344 25.97
7 Car & Cycle 40 0.77
8 Car & Auto Rickshaw 3 0.06
9 2-Wheeler & Cycle 1028 19.86
10 2-Wheeler & Auto Rickshaw 16 0.31
11 Cycle & Auto Rickshaw 18 0.35
12 Car, 2-Wheeler & Cycle 417 8.06
13 Car, 2-Wheeler & Auto Rickshaw 7 0.14
14 2-Wheeler, Cycle & Auto Rickshaw 10 0.19
15 Car, 2-Wheeler, Cycle & Auto Rickshaw 4 0.08
Total 5175 100.00
Source: RITES Primary Surveys – 2009
0.06% 19.86%
No Vehicle
0.31% Only Car
0.77% 0.35%
Only 2-Whlr.
8.06%
Only Cycle
Nil
57%
4 and More
1%
1
47% Nil
22%
2
8%
3
2%
House Wife
24%
Student
27% Retired
5%
Unemployed
3%
Others
Business
10% 5%
Govt. Service
Pvt. Service 12%
14%
Graduate
10th to 12th. 24%
28% Post Graduate
7%
Illiterate
2%
Child
4%
Average household income per month in the study area was observed to be Rs. 22857.
<=Rs 5000
3%
Table 7.10 and Figure 7.10 gives the distribution of the households according to
monthly expenditure on Transport. The table indicates that about 12% of households
spend less than or equal to Rs. 500 per month on transport and over 15% have
monthly expenditure on transport ranging between Rs. 500 – 1000. About 35% of
households are having more than Rs. 2500 expenditure per month on transport.
Average expenditure on transport per household is estimated as Rs 2474 per month,
which is about 10.8% of average household income.
Rs 1001 - 1250
6%
Rs 751 – 1000
10% > Rs 2501
34%
Rs 501 – 750
5%
<=Rs 500 No Response
12% 2%
Distribution of trips according to mode of travel is given in Table 7.11 to Table 7.13
and Figure 7.11 to 7.13. It is observed that about 17% of the trips are walk trips.
However, the trips performed by 2 wheelers are about 35% and 11% performed by
bus. A trip performed by auto rickshaw and shared auto is about 7% whereas trips
performed by cars are nearly 15%. Per capita trip rate including walk is 1.32,
excluding walk is 1.1 and for motorised trips is 0.9.
Rick
3%
Cycle
11%
T.W.
36%
Bus
11%
S. Auto Auto
6% 1%
Bus
Cycle
14%
13%
S. Auto
7%
Rick
3%
Auto
2%
Car
18%
T.W.
43%
S. Auto
9%
Auto Bus
2% 16%
Car
22%
T .W.
51%
Table 7.14 and Figure 7.14 gives the purpose wise distribution of the trips. It is
observed from the table that about 25% of the trips are performed for work and
business purpose together, where as 19% trips are education and about 6% for other
trips which includes shopping, social heath and recreation. About 50% trips are return
trips.
Return Work
24.91% Return Education
19.14%
Others
5.82%
Return Others
5.74%
Education
19.23% Work
25.16%
Mode wise distribution of trips by trip length is presented in Table 7.15 and average
trip length is presented in Table 7.16. Average trip length for walk is 1.09 Km, for 2-
wheeler 6.89 Km and for Bus it is about 11.49 Km.
Opinion survey was carried out to obtain preference of commuter about shifting to
good public transport system. The respondents were asked willingness to pay extra
fare and time saving with respect to their existing transport used.
Table 7.17 shows that about 97% of respondents are willing to shift to a good public
transport system where as 3% of respondents want to use their existing mode of
travel.
Table 7.18 shows 69% are willing to shift if the saving in travel time is up to 10 min
in comparison with their mode of travel and remaining respondents show their
willingness to shift to new public transport if the time saving is about 30 min from
their existing mode of travel.
The willingness to pay extra fare for good public transport system is given in Table
7.19. The table indicates that about 73% respondents want the same fare for new
public transport as existing bus fare, 17% are willing to pay 1.25 times and 8% are
showing their willingness to give 1.5 times fare for new public transport system in
comparison to existing bus fare.
Table 7.19 Willingness to Pay Extra Fare in Relation to Existing Bus Fare
7.4 CONCLUSIONS
It is observed that monthly household income per month of the residents of urban
complex is about Rs 22857/- which is quite high w.r.t to other metropolitan cities.
Average monthly household expenditure on transport is about Rs 2474/- which is
about 10.8% of the total monthly income. About 70% of the motorised trips are
performed by private modes due to lack of good and citywide mass public transport
system. Only 10% of the total motorised trips are made by bus system which is very
low. If a good citywide public mass transport system is provided in the urban complex
at a reasonable fare and with good feeder service the use of private vehicle will be
reduced thereby reducing the vehicle loads on the road network.
CHAPTER 8
EXISTING AND PROPOSED LANDUSE
DISTRIBUTION
8.1 BACKGROUND
8.1.1 One of the important aspects of traffic demand modelling exercise is the estimation of
base and horizon year landuse parameters. Base year landuse parameters like
population and employment have been taken from 2001 Census Data, and data
collected from Chandigarh Administration, Development Authorities, Municipal
Corporations, Town & Country Planning Organisation, etc. Landuse parameters for
various horizon years have been estimated as envisaged in the Master Plans of
Chandigarh, Outline Master Plan of SAS Nagar and Interim Development Plans for
Panchkula Urban Estate, Extension & Mansa Devi Complex (MDC), GMADA
Report, City Development plan of Chandigarh, Development Plans of Kalka-Pinjore,
Baddi, Alipur, KotBehla and Parwanu.
8.2.1 Base year (2009) population estimation for the study area has been done on the basis
of electoral list, divisional growth trends, proposals for the master plan of Chandigarh
and City development plan of Chandigarh, outline Master Plans of SAS Nagar,
Structural plan 2008-2058 of Greater Mohali Region, Development Plan for
Panchkula Urban Estate Extension and MDC areas, Development Plan of Kalak-
Pinjore 2025, development plan of Baddi-Barotiwala 2025 detailed Census Data
(2001), etc. Study area population comprising towns of Chandigarh, SAS Nagar and
Panchkula, Zirakpur, Kharar, Kalka-Pinjore and Dera Bassi is almost touching 21.17
lakh for 2009 (refer Table 8.1).
8.3.1 Chandigarh: The existing sectors are saturated to an extent and hence may see a little
appreciation in the growth. The Capital Complex in Sector 1, main Central Business
District in Sector 17, areas around Sukhna Lake, PGI in Sector 12, commercial/office
areas along Madhya Marg and Dakshin Marg, Sub City Centre of Sector 34, and Mani
Majra will continue to attract a large number of people for their employment,
shopping, trading, medical, education, tourism and other requirements. Chandigarh
was envisaged as a planned service-oriented city of low-rise development.
Chandigarh Administration is aggressively planning new areas of Phase III including
high rise development in Sectors 48, 49, 50, and new institutional area beyond Sector
12, Dhanas and Maloa Rehabilitation areas etc. to accommodate rising populations
and providing upgraded scale of services to its inhabitants. IT Park and its extension,
Industrial Area Phase I and II have already been attracting a large number of people
for their employment needs. The proposed Industrial Area Phase III and Fruit &
Vegetable Market near Raipur Kalan would also be developed and thereby attracting
large number of people for employment requirements. The high density area in
Chandigarh city is shown in Figure 8.1.
8.3.2 SAS Nagar (Mohali): SAS Nagar is basically a developing city. Planning Authorities
have proposed several new sectors to accommodate rising population and provide
upgraded scale of services to its inhabitants. Besides the existing residential areas,
Sectors 77 to 80, 85, 86, 88 to 90, 93 to 99 and 103 to 107 and Pockets B & C would
experience moderate to high population growth as per the Outline Master Plan of SAS
Nagar 1996-2016.
The City Centre in Sector 62, Bulky Market in Sector 65-A and another City Centre in
Sector 87, Regional Commercial Shopping along the sector roads, Wholesale and
Warehousing & Storage depots zone in Sector 102 would be attracting a large number
of people for their employment, shopping, trading, education, medical and other
requirements. Re-densification of already developed areas is under way with new
industry areas having been proposed to be developed in Sectors 66B, 82, 83, 100, 101
and 102. Some areas in Pocket B along Kharar-SAS Nagar bye pass road have been
demarcated for industrial use purposes. The sector wise landuse use map of Mohali is
shown as Figure 8.2.
8.3.3 Panchkula: Like SAS Nagar, Panchkula is also a developing town with new areas
viz. Panchkula Extension and Mansa Devi Complex (MDC) having been developed.
Planning Authorities have proposed several new sectors in these areas to
accommodate rising population and provide upgraded scale of services to its
inhabitants. Sectors 23 (part), 24 to 28 and 31 as per the Development Master Plan of
Panchkula Extension and Sectors 2, 4, 5 and 6 as per Mansa Devi Urban Complex
Development Plan, would experience high population growth.
The District Centre and Mini Secretariat in Sector 1, City Centre in Sector 5, other
district centres in Sectors 14 & 16, Commercial areas including a Mandi in Sector 20
and Industrial Area Phase I & II would be attracting a large number of people for their
employment, shopping, trading, education, medical and other requirements. Re-
densification of existing sectors is under way. IT Park in Sector 3 and commercial
areas in Sector 5B of MDC, commercial areas in Sectors 23, 25 and 27 of Panchkula
Extension would be generating ample opportunities of employment for the people.
The sector wise landuse use map of Panchkula and its Extension is shown as Figure
8.3.
8.3.4 Zirakpur: Zirakpur is a town and a Municipal council in Mohali district in the state
of Punjab. It is located near the state capital, Chandigarh. It is on the Chandigarh-
Delhi highway and just south of the city. It is at a distance of 4km from Chandigarh
airport. Panchkula is 5 Km from Zirakpur. Zirakpur have borders touching
Chandigarh (Union Territory) & Panchkula (Haryana). The GMADA development
plan along with its regional linkages is shown in Figure 8.4.
A four lane flyover has also been constructed by NHAI through Zirakpur to ease the
flow of traffic. The six lanning of Zirakpur-Panchkula-Kalka road is in progress.
The population projection of Zirakpur town has been taken from the Structural Plan
2056 of GMADA report.
Kharar: is a small city and a municipal council in Mohali district in the state of
Punjab. It is at a distance of about 10-15 kilometres from Chandigarh and about 4
kilometers from Mohali.
As it has the advantage of proximity to both Chandigarh and Mohali. Also because
the Punjab Government is encouraging development in Kharar, this has given shape
to a lot of colonies approved by PUDA (Punjab Urban Planning and Development
Authority) being developed in the city, prominent among these being Model Town,
Shivalik Enclave, Sunny Enclave and Gillco A major area of Kharar has been
allocated to the GMADA (Greater Mohali Development Authority) for further
development in 2006. The GMADA development plan along with its regional
linkages is shown in Figure 8.4.
At present the Commercial area mainly exists along the NH-22 in both the towns.
Additional Commercial area of 487 acres is proposed in the form of Commercial belts
along the 100 Mts. wide road linking Nalagarh Road with Kalka Town. The area
between Kaushalya River & NH-22 near Surajpur is also proposed to be developed as
Commercial Sector 1 & 6 and sector 22 proposed as a city centre and sector-31-A as
District Centre.
Except for Industrial Area of H.M.T., Kalka and Pinjore towns lack in Industrial
activities, 610 acres is proposed under industrial use along the Pinjore-–Nalagarh
road. Since the town is well connected with rail and road network it has potential for
industrial development. Only non-polluting industries will be allowed to be set in the
proposed Industrial area Phase II along Pinjore Nalagarh Road (NH-21-A). The town
also has the potential to provide base for ancillary industries for HMT and other
Industries located at Baddi, Barotiwala and Parwanoo.
Baddi region lies in the lap of outer Himalayas forming part of Shivaliks. It is
bounded by hills in the north and plains in the south which ran contiguous with the
plains of Haryana. The region is most sought after area in the state for the establishing
industries. Located in the plains with good connectivity to neighbouring states,
entrepreneurs prefer to establish their manufacturing.
At present 642 industrial units are functioning in Baddi- Barotiwala area. Out of
which 130 units area of L & M scale category and 512 units area of SSI category.
Prominent among them area Vardhaman Group, Birla Textile, Dabur India Ltd.
Cadilla Healthcare, Cipla, Cadbury etc.
Alipur – Kot Bhela: Alipur – Kot Bhela are situated on National Highway No.73.
Both the towns are situated at a distance of 18 Kms from Panchkula as Panchkula
Extension II and 28 Km from Chandigarh. The main population is situated at 400
meters away from NH 73. Industrial activities in this area are basically agricultural
related. However the scenario will change radically as soon as the area is developed
into an integrated township/urban centre of periphery controlled area as well as Alipur
controlled area and Nano city to be developed in the close vicinity of the town. The
city will provide high quality infrastructure to cater both the personal and business
need of the residents. Due to strategic location on NH No.73 it is very well connected
with the other towns of the state.
8.3.6 Expected population growth of the various towns and respective growth rates are
mentioned in Table 8.2. Projected population of Chandigarh Urban Complex is
shown in figure 8.5. Study area population for various horizon years is estimated as
24.6lakhs (2011), 37.68 Lakh (2021), 49.54 lakh (2031) and 59.08 lakh (2041).
Sr.
Population Annual growth rate
No Name of Town 2001 2009 2011 2021 2031 2041 2001 2009 2011 2021 2031 2041
1 Chandirarh 900635 1326821 1459274 1795461 2349824 2801127 - 4.96 4.87 2.09 2.73 1.77
2 SAS Nagar 123484 182456 241451 649472 815308 1029094 - 5.00 15.04 10.40 2.30 2.36
3 Panchkula 140925 228800 251054 495975 542253 567284 - 6.24 4.75 7.05 0.90 0.45
4 Zirakpur 25022 63204 132807 185162 233028 293305 - 12.28 44.96 3.38 2.33 2.33
5 Kharar 42289 70167 79664 111069 139781 175938 - 6.53 6.55 3.38 2.33 2.33
6 Kalka-Pinjore 77500 121221 135625 257688 518568 572822 - 5.75 5.77 6.63 7.24 1.00
7 Dera Bassi 15841 62903 88796 123801 155805 196106 - 18.81 18.81 3.38 2.33 2.33
8 Baddi 22601 42928 50396 88103 130253 192568 - 8.35 8.35 5.74 3.99 3.99
9 Alipur -Kot Behla 3324 7215 9050 42399 46834 51733 12 12 16.7 1 1
10 Parwanu 8609 11782 12743 18862 22992 28027 4 4 4 2 2
Total 1360230 2117497 2460860 3767992 4954646 5908004 - - - - - -
8.3.7 The residential densities for various areas as proposed in the various Master Plans and
development plans are used for population projection at traffic zone level. The
population in areas, which are already densely populated and have limited scope of
growth, has been assumed to be saturated. Other traffic zones have been assumed to
grow according to the residential density pattern and the landuse plan. The study area
comprises of 176 internal traffic zones.
Population Projections
3000000
2500000
2000000
Population
1500000
1000000
500000
0
2001 2009 2011 2021 2031 2041
Chandirarh 900635 1326821 1459274 1795461 2349824 2801127
SAS Nagar 123484 182456 241451 649472 815308 1029094
Panchkula 140925 228800 251054 495975 542253 567284
Zirakpur 25022 63204 132807 185162 233028 293305
Years
8.3.8 Table 8.3 shows zone wise estimated population distribution in the study area for
various horizon years viz. 2009, 2011, 2021, 2031 & 2041. High residential
concentration in Chandigarh is observed at Sectors 20, 22, 25, 26, 38 to 41, 44, 45, 46,
High-rise flatted development was noted along Sectors 48 to 56. Similarly, dense
residential agglomerations are observed on the northern end of SAS Nagar towards
Chandigarh boundary viz. Sector 59 to 61and 68 to 71. For Panchkula, residential
population is almost equally distributed in the Sectors 25 to 27.
Table 8.3 Distribution of Population by Traffic Zones
8.4.1 Study area employment has been estimated on the basis of total population and Work
Force Participation Rate (WFPR). As per 2009 estimation, aggregate WFPR in the
study area is 36.42 % with Chandigarh having highest WFPRs as compared to SAS
Nagar & Panchkula, Zirakpur, Kalka Pinjore, Kharar, Dera bassi expect Baddi having
WFPR of 46% (refer Table 8.4). Total horizon year employment in Chandigarh, SAS
Nagar and Panchkula across different sectors has been worked out on the basis of
detailed discussions with planning officials regarding future policies, landuse plans
and limited verification/updation provided by them on actual status of
development/occupancy in various areas.
Table 8.4 Work Force and Workforce Participation Rate of the Study Area 2009
8.4.2 As the study area is expected to absorb high employment due to steady in-migration
and establishment of offices, manufacturing units, IT parks, industrial estates, etc. due
to massive industrial resurgence in the coming years, it is apparent that future decadal
employment rates would increase. The projected work force participation rate for
various urban areas are given in Table No. 8.5
Table 8.5 Projected Work Force Participation rate for Various Horizon Years
Horizon Years
S.No Name of Town 2009 2011 2021 2031 2041
1 Chandirarh 38 38.1 38.5 39 39
2 SAS Nagar 33 34.1 35.2 36 36.5
3 Panchkula 32.8 34.4 34.9 35.5 35.6
4 Zirakpur 37 38 38 39 39
5 Kharar 33 33 34 35 36
6 Kalka-Pinjore 31 31 32 33 33
7 Dera Bassi 34 34 35 36 36
8 Baddi 46 45 42 38 33
9 Alipur - Kot Behla 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0
10 Parwanu 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0
Aggregate (%) 36.48 36.76 36.96 37.15 36.81
8.4.3 Employment distribution and respective growth rates are mentioned in Table 8.6 and
Figure 8.6 study area employments for various horizon years are estimated as 9.03-
lakhs (2011), 13.75-lakhs (2021), 18.45-Lakh (2031) and 22.0 Lakh (2041).
Employment Estimates
1200000
1000000
Employment
800000
600000
400000
200000
0
2009 2011 2021 2031 2041
Chandirarh 503708 555300 691500 917200 1092200
SAS Nagar 60300 82301 228800 293600 375650
Panchkula 75000 86350 172950 192450 201750
Zirakpur 23386 50467 70362 90881 114389
Year
8.4.4 Table 8.7 shows zone wise employment distribution in the study area for various
horizon years viz. 2009, 2011, 2021, 2031 & 2041. Heavy employment concentration
in Chandigarh is presently observed at Sector 17, Sector 34, University area in Sector
14 and Sectors along Madhya Marg, Dakshin Marg and Himalaya Marg. For future
years, there would be further densification of these locations along with new areas
between the cities on either sides of Madhya Marg and Himalaya Marg. Apart from
this; upcoming IT Park would be major producer of employment opportunities. In
SAS Nagar, major employment concentration is observed at City Centre Sector 62,
light Industry in Sectors 55, 57, 58 and Bulky Material market in Sector 65 A. Future
employment attraction would include Sectors 78, 82, 83, 87, 91, 100, 101, and 102.
Some areas in Pocket B along Kharar-SAS Nagar Bye Pass Road would also provide
employment opportunities. Similarly, dense employment agglomerations are observed
on Sectors 1, 5, 14, 16 and Industrial Area Phase I & II in Panchkula Urban Estate
area. Future employment attractions would be IT Park in Sector 3, Sector 5B of
Mansa Devi Complex and Sectors 23, 25 and 27 of Panchkula Extension.
8.5 CONCLUSIONS
8.5.1 Population of Chandigarh Urban Complex and its nearby town expected to increase
from 13.60 Lakh in the year 2001 to 59 Lakh by the year 2041. Population for the
year 2009 is estimated is 21.17 Lakh.
8.5.2 The low population concentration sectors in Chandigarh are 1 to 19, 21 to 24 and 27
to 37 whereas high population sectors are 40 to 56 and Mani Majra, Sector 38.
Similarly, dense residential agglomerations are observed on the northern end of SAS
Nagar towards Chandigarh boundary viz. Sector 59 to 61and 68 to 71. For Panchkula,
residential population is almost equally distributed in the Sectors 25 to 27.
8.5.3 The average work force participation rate in the Chandigarh urban complex and its
urban agglomeration is expected to increase from 36.48% in 2007 to 36.81% in 2041.
Total employment in Chandigarh urban complex and its urban agglomeration is
expected to increase from 7.70 Lakh in 2007 to 22.00 Lakh in 2041.
8.5.4 The substantial increase in area of office / commercial / industrial and other activities
expected are, proposed Industrial Area Phase III and vegetable and whole sale market
near Raipur Kalan, IT Park at Mani Majra, Existing Industrial Area in Chandigarh,
new proposed industrial areas of SAS Nagar, district centre and Mini Secretariat and
Mansa Devi urban complex of Panchkula. This will mean a large increase in
employment in the traffic zones falling in these sectors. This will attract large traffic
to these traffic zones. Thus mass transport system to these traffic zones will need to be
extended / augmented to cater to expected transport demand.
8.5.5 As the nearby towns are also being developed at a rapid pace, traffic between
Chandigarh Urban Complex and their towns is expected to increase. Therefore
adequate good quality citywide mass public transport system will need to be provided
to meet this expected demand.
CHAPTER 9
TRANSPORT DEMAND FORECAST AND
SYSTEM SELECTION
9.1 INTRODUCTION
9.1.1 The transportation study process consists of development of formulae (or models),
enabling forecast of travel demand, and development of alternative strategies for
handling this demand. It is not just one model, but a series of inter-linked and inter-
related models of varying levels of complexity, dealing with different facets of travel
demand. Through these models, the transportation study process as a whole is checked
and calibrated before it is used for future travel predictions.
9.1.2 In the present study, a four-stage transport demand model has been developed for
estimating future travel demand. The normal and easily available planning variables
at zonal levels such as population, employment and student enrolment have been
made use of in transport demand analysis.
Table 9.1 Trip Generation Sub-Models for Home Based one-way Work Trips – 2009
Trip Production
All Modes Population 0.322305 0.96
Trip Attraction
All Modes Employment 0.879656 0.71
Table 9.2 Trip Generation Sub-Models for Home Based one-way Education Trips – 2009
Table 9.3 Trip Generation Sub-Models For Home Based One-Way Other Trips – 2009
Trip Attraction
All Modes Employment 0.123165 0.44
Table 9.4 Trip Generation Sub-Models for Home Based One-Way Total Trips – 2009
Trip Attraction
All Modes Employment 1.359046 0.67
9.4.1 The gravity model formulation has been used for developing the synthetic O-D matrix
for the intra-city trips. The formulation of Gravity model used is as under:
The calibrated values of Gravity Model parameter for home-based trips for various
modes are presented in Table 9.5. Calibration process included comparison of
observed and simulated mean trip lengths as well as shapes of the trip length
frequency distribution.
The observed trip length frequency distributions for different purposes (work,
education and other) were obtained from the 2009 Household Travel Survey data. For
simulated trip length frequency distributions, the parameter values (negative
exponential) were varied until the simulated and observed trip length frequency
distributions for each purpose exhibited the following.
- The shape and position of both curves relatively close to each other when
compared visually.
- The difference between mean trip lengths was within 3 percent variation
The calibration procedure developed by Bureau of Public Roads was used, which
adjusts the measure of attraction used in the Gravity Model. Eight such iterations of
attraction trip and balancing procedure were carried out for each trip mode wise
separately.
A comparison of observed and simulated trip length frequency for public, private and
total trips is presented in Figure 9.2 A to 9.2 C.
CALCULATE BALANCED
ATTRACTIONS
9.4.3 The measure of deterrence is the perceived inter-zonal generalised cost – this is what
the traveller unconsciously thinks it costs him to travel from one place to another.
For each pair of zones, generalised cost for a public transport trip or by any other
mode is determined. For any inter-zonal trip, the cost between each of the two zone
centroids and between them and the appropriate actual network nodes is added to
establish the least cost journey through the whole network between the zones. For
example, for a trip including one or more public transport links and walk links
thereto, the public transport generalised cost would be made up of:
a) Walking time to bus stop (from notional centroid link)
b) Waiting time at bus stop
c) Travelling time on bus
d) Interchange waiting time – where appropriate
e) Walking time from bus stop to destination (by notional centroid link).
9.4.4 In a somewhat similar way, generalised cost for other modes is determined. The
least-cost journey from any zone to another is determined by a tree building process.
Separate least-cost journey trees are built for public transport trips and for trips by
other modes.
Figure 9.2 (a) Trip Length Frequency Distribution (Public Mode Trips)
25
20
No. of Trips (in %)
15
Observed
Modeled
10
0
5
5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
2.
7.
12
17
22
27
32
37
42
47
52
57
62
67
72
Figure 9.2 (b) Trip Length Frequency Distribution (Private Mode Trips)
30
25
No. of Trips (in %)
20
Observed
15
Modeled
10
0
2.5
7.5
12.5
17.5
22.5
27.5
32.5
37.5
42.5
47.5
52.5
57.5
25
20
0
2.5
12.5
22.5
32.5
42.5
52.5
62.5
72.5
Trip Length (in min.)
9.4.5 For the purpose of analysis in this study, Cij values, which should normally be based
on Generalised Cost, have been taken only in terms of travel time. Travel time
matrices have been computed and ‘skim trees’ built representing shortest travel paths
between each pair of zones taking road congestion into consideration.
9.5.1 The household travel survey carried out in 2009 shows low modal split in favour of
public transport. Modal split in favour of public transport for the city of size of
Chandigarh urban complex should be in the range of 40% – 60% of total motorized
trips. The lower modal split in favour of public transport system shows the deficiency
in public transport system in terms of quantity and quality.
A good mass transport system is expected to increase a higher modal split in favour of
public transport. It has been assumed that modal split in favour of Mass Transport will
increase to 54%, 60%, 65% and 70% by the year 2014, 2021, 2031 and 2041
respectively.
9.6.1 For the purpose of this study, Capacity restrained assignment technique has been
followed. In this method of assignment, private and public transport trip matrices are
loaded onto their respective networks, using an incremental assignment method. The
trip matrices are assigned to the shortest paths generated successively after
assignment of small lots each of 20% increment of the trips matrices. The
incremental assignment proceeds by updating the private and public transport
networks using the speed flow relationships of the links until 100% of the two
matrices are assigned.
9.6.2 The assignment is largely controlled by alternative paths, which are built by the
shortest path algorithm through the network. There is simultaneous building of
shortest paths for the two networks (mass transport and private trips), and rules
adopted are:
1. The paths are not allowed to be built through the zone centroids, other than the
origin and the destination end.
2. Due to the type of signal phasing adopted for intersections, the right turning
traffic has to wait for a few seconds more than the straight moving traffic.
Also, as the right turners have to follow a curved and longer path through the
intersection, a penalty of 30 seconds is adopted for such assignment.
9.6.3 The road network is assigned the road capacity based on the available lane widths.
The types of roads and their capacities are given in Table 9.6.
It has been assumed that roads have a given capacity, while the mass transport
network has unlimited capacity.
9.6.4 In addition to the capacity values, the speed flow relationships of the three types of
links are required for modifying the speeds for each incremental loading. A
mathematical model was developed for each link type. These mathematical models
are as follows:
2-Lane Divided
S = Sf (1.0 – 0.57 (V/C) 30
4-Lane Divided
S = Sf (1.0 – 0.63 (V/C)27
6-Lane Divided
S = Sf (1.0 – 0.60 (V/C)25
Where
S = Speed in kmph
Sf = Free flow speed in kmph
V = Assigned volume in PCU’s
C = Capacity of road link in PCU’s
The initial free flow speeds taken for the assignment of public and private modes are
summarised in Table 9.7 (A)
9.6.5 The results from the incremental assignments, which are in terms of person trips, have
to be converted to PCU’s for updating the link speeds. As the occupancy levels of the
private modes are drastically different from the road-based public transport modes,
separate passenger to PCU conversion factors have been derived for the two types of
travel. For this purpose, the city has been divided into two regions - each having a
different mix of traffic characteristics. The factors used for the two regions are given
in Table 9.7 (B).
The roads are also used by goods vehicles and other slow moving vehicles. The
capacity comparison and speed modifications must take movement of these vehicles
and mixed traffic conditions into account. Thus, after the person trips are converted
to vehicles trips in terms of PCUs, the goods traffic factors has been used to
incorporate the mixed flow conditions because of goods and the slow moving
vehicles.
Table 9.7 (B) PCU Conversion Factors
9.6.6 In the assignment process, the link speeds get modified by appropriate modelling of
speed flow relationships. As the volume-capacity ratio increases towards 1.0, the link
speed decreases fast to a residual value of about 10 to 15 kmph. In case of further
loading of the link (which is possible in absence of alternate paths) beyond
volume/capacity ratio of 1.0, the speeds may get negative.
Accordingly, to control the speed to a non-negative residual value, the lowest bound
for public and private mode speeds is taken as 5.0 and 10.0 kmph respectively.
The base year assigned trips were compared with the ground counts of selected
arterials to establish the validity of models as stated earlier for working out horizon
year (2021) transport demand forecast.
9.7.1 The following assumptions have been made while working out the traffic demand on
the proposed system:
1. The basic inputs to the study i.e. the landuse parameters for the year 2014,
2021, 2031 & 2041 were worked out by RITES in consultation with
Chandigarh Administration, PUDA & TCPO in Mohali, HUDA & TCPO
department in Panchkula.
2. The integrated transport network includes the future road network proposals.
3. For working out a path between an origin and destination, travel times have
been considered.
4. Proper inter-modal integration facilities, including approach roads are
assumed to be available at all stations of MRT System.
5. Wherever possible, proper passenger integration has been assumed.
6. For traffic between Chandigarh Urban Complex and nearby town and other
regional traffic, appropriate growth rates have been used considering the
expected growth of these towns.
9.7.2 The summary of horizon years (2014, 2021, 2031& 2041) transport demand forecasts
for study area is presented in Table 9.8.
Table 9.8 Summary of Transport Demand Forecast for Chandigarh Urban Complex
S. Item Figures (Lakh)
No 2014 2021 2031 2041
1 Population 24.50 31.28 39.42 46.93
2 Employment 9.10 11.64 14.94 17.84
3 Per Capital Trip Rate (motorized) 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30
4 Total Trips 29.34 40.56 56.31 73.40
5 Intra city Trips 24.50 34.41 47.30 61.01
6 Inter city Trips 4.84 6.15 9.01 12.39
7 Modal split (Share by Public Transport for 54% 60% 65% 70%
total Intra city trips)
9.8.1 The major transport corridors for mass transport system have been identified on the
basis of future landuse to be developed in various parts of the urban complex and
expected traffic on various corridors on the basis of transport demand modeling and
forecasting. The mass transport corridors as suggested in the earlier studies carried out
in the study area were considered and review of the given corridors of Madhya Marg,
Himalaya Marg and Purv Marg as decided by the Governments was also done.
For business as usual scenario i.e the traffic to move as it is moving now on the road
system only has been considered to examine the adequacy of the road system. Share
of car and two wheeler is expected to go up to 73 % in total motorised trips for this
scenario.
The road only network consists of all the roads with Right of Way of 18 m
(carriageway with atleast 2 lane) and above and covers the whole area of Chandigarh
Urban Complex.
9.8.3 The origin – destination matrix for the year 2014, 2021, 2031 and 2041 has been
assigned on road only network.
9.8.4 The trip assignment on this network in the year 2021& 2041 shows that the following
road corridors will carry the high traffic. These major corridors indicating maximum
peak hour peak direction trips (PHPDT) by all modes are given in Table 9.9.
9.8.5 Thus expected transport demand on many of the above corridors cannot met by a
normal road based transport system. Therefore mass transport system such as metro,
mono rail, bus rapid transit system etc. will be required on many corridors to cater to
future transport demand.
9.9.1 Considering mass transport system on along major traffic carrying corridors in the
future, traffic assignment for the various horizon years has been carried out.
9.9.2 The expected maximum section passenger loadings in PHPDT on various mass
transport corridors are given in Table 9.10.
Choice of mode will depend mainly on the expected demand by mass transport
system on a corridor, available road right-of-way (ROW) and the capacity of the
mode. Other considerations are the land-use along the corridor, the location of
building lines, and the potential for increasing the ROW. Cost of the same mode of
transport can vary at different locations depending on engineering constraints. It is
therefore important that the final choice of mode is based on techno-economic
considerations.
9.10.2 In choosing a mode for a corridor, first priority should be given to at-grade services
and BRT. It offers convenience to commuters particularly the short distance users.
Commuters do not have to walk up and down to use the services. The construction
cost is low. It offers the best financial sustainability. If road ROW is inadequate and it
cannot be widened, and/or the route is congested, an elevated/underground mode
needs to be proposed.
The comparative capacity of the main transport modes used in developing cities is
reported in a TRRL-UK study (1995) and World Bank study (2000). As per these
studies, it appears that the capacity of various modes may be taken as follows;
There is no mention of the Monorail in this study, but based on information available,
it appears that the mode has been used up to a demand level of 10000 PHPDT and
designed and used in one case up to 20000 PHPDT. However capacity of the grade
separated LRT and Monorail can be stretched upto 30000 PHPDT. Thus, it appears
that BRT, Monorail and LRT, can be used when the demand on a corridor is not
expected to exceed 20000 PHPDT. Beyond the demand level of about 20000 PHPDT,
a metro system (light or heavy) is considered more appropriate.
The World Bank report further states that the bus way output depend greatly on road
network configuration, junction spacing and stop spacing. It typically has been
demonstrated to be high at about 10,000 PHPDT at 20 km/h on arterial corridors and
15-17 km/h on urban corridors for a one-lane each way bus-way. If provision for bus
overtaking at bus stops is kept and grade separation provided at major junction,
passenger throughputs of 20,000 PHPDT have been demonstrated.
All medium capacity modes normally lie within the road right of way and hence
require a share in the road space. At-grade modes however require more space than
elevated modes. For at-grade BRT, the desirable right of way requirement is 35 m to
meet the requirements of the IRC code, but with an absolute minimum of 28 m. The
latter allows for two- lane sub-standard carriageways each way and a combined cycle
track and footpath. Additional space is required at stations/stops. This includes the
requirement for overtaking facility as well. It may be possible to reduce the
requirement further when the demand level is low such as at the periphery of the city.
The above does not include service roads. It is highly unlikely that the desired ROW
will be available for full length of the corridor. Elevating the corridor at tight
locations could be one option.
On the basis of above consideration elevated mass transport system such as metro,
LRT, monorail can be provided on corridors where future transport demand is
expected to be more than 20000 PHPDT. Considering that elevated mass transport
systems are not preferred in Chandigarh due to aesthetics reasons, it has been decided
by State and Central Governments to go for underground metro on critical stretches.
Therefore on corridors where transport demands are expected to be more than 20000
PHPDT in future, metro system (underground where aesthetics are important and
elevated on others) has been suggested. It has also been considered to extend atleast
one metro corridor to Mohali and Panchkula. On remaining corridors where demand
is expected to be less than 20000 PHPDT by mass transport, BRT system has been
considered. Considering this the suggested mass transport system on various corridors
are given in are given in Table 9.11.
To meet the passenger transport demand between Chandigarh Urban Complex and
Kalka/ Baddi Commuter Rail System (CRS) is suggested. In addition to CRS between
Chandigarh Urban Complex and Kalka/ Baddi a normal bus system will also need to
be augmented.
The proposed multi-modal intra-urban mass transport system route details are as
follows
Metro Corridors
ii) Corridor II: Sectt. Sector 1 Chandigarh to Bus terminal Sector 104 S.A.S
Nagar Mohali, Via Rock Garden, Sector 9, Sector 17 interchange, Sector 17
ISBT, Sector 22-Aroma Hotel Sector 34, Bus Terminal Sector 43, Sector 52,
Mohali Sector 62, Sector 60, Sector 72, Sector 71, Sector 75, Sector 76, Sector
77, Sector 78, Sector 87, 97, 106, 105 covering a distance of 22 Km.
iii) Corridor III : Timber Market Chowk Sector 26 to Sector 38 and Dadu Majra
along Purv Marg and Vikas Marg covering a distance of approximately 14.6
Km.
iv) Corridor – IV: Housing Board Chowk to Sector 21 Panchkula, via Panchkula
Sector 17,16,15,14, & 21 covering a distance of 5 km.
BRT Corridors
ii) BRT Corridor II :Sukhna Lake – Chandigarh Sector 49, Kharar (along
Sukhna Path up to sector 49 and than along Sector 62 SAS Nagar) along
NH 21 covering a distance of 20 km.
iii) BRT Corridor III: PGI – Pocket F SAS Nagar (along Vidya Path) covering a
distance of 11 km.
iv) BRT Corridor IV: Kharar – Bannur along K.B. Road – 18 km.
v) BRT Corridor V: Pocket F SAS Nagar – Chatbir along SAS nagar Sector
Road – 20 km.
vi) BRT Corridor VI: Sector 28 Panchkula Extension – Mansa Devi Complex
via sector 5 city centre Panchkula-23 kms.
vii) BRT Corridor VII: Housing Board Chowk – Sector 1 Panchkula Zirakpur –
14 km.
viii) BRT Corridor VIII: Industrial Area Phase 2 Panchkula – Dakshin Marg
(along route No. 2) – 4 km.
ix) BRT Corridor IX: Sector 49 – Sector 87 city centre Mohali. - 9 Km.
9.12.1 The passenger inflow using the MRT system network consisting of these four lines is
expected to be as follows:
Line – III: Sector 26 – Sector 38 Dadu Majra (along Purv Marg and Vikas Marg of
length about 13km. consisting of 16 stations. The numbers of passengers, expected to
be carried by this line, are 0.83 Lakh, 1.27 Lakh, 2.14 Lakh and 3.11 Lakh in the
years 2014, 2021, 2031 and 2041 respectively.
9.12.2 The summary of transport demand forecast is presented in Table 9.12, Table 9.13,
Table 9.14, & Table 9.15 for the year 2014, 2021, 2031 & 2041 respectively. It is
seen that, the network with a length of about 57.7 km would carry 3.19 Lakh, 5.01
Lakh, 8.08 Lakh and 11.74 Lakh passengers per day for the year 2014, 2021, 2031
and 2041 respectively, The passenger km carried would be 22.35 Lakh & 37.60 Lakh,
68.60 Lakh and 108.01 Lakh respectively for the years 2014, 2021, 2031 and 2041.
9.13.1 Considering the expected transport demand on various corridors of the proposed
system the phasing of implementation is suggested as follows (Table 9.16).
9.13.2 Expected ridership on metro system in two phases is shown in Table 9.17.
9.14.1 Expected on road system future traffic volumes on various roads for business as usual
scenario and with proposed mass transport system has been estimated. Table 9.18
below shows V/C ratios at various major roads in study area. It can be seen from table
that most of the roads have V/C ratios for year 2009 less than 1.0 except two corridors
namely Madhya Marg and Udyog Path. However with Business As Usual Scenario,
these V/C ratios are expected to be well above 1 by year 2021 on all major corridors.
9.14.2 The following table (Table 9.18) gives the V/C ratio for year 2009, and also projected
V/C ratios for the years 2021 and 2041 for the two scenarios. If there is no public
mass transit system and the traffic is allowed to follow the present pattern with
increased volumes for year 2021 and 2041. Under these circumstances corridors like
Vidya Path, Himalaya Marg, Madhya Marg, Udyog Path, Purv Marg, Vikas Marg and
Dakshin Marg will get choked by personalized modes such as cars and two wheeler
by year 2021 and beyond as the lanes required to cater to traffic in 2021 and beyond
will be exhausted as most of the roads are already been widened to its full capacity.
Thus, it will be necessary to provide citywide a good quality public mass transport
system as proposed above in this chapter. It can further be seen that the V/C ratios on
many roads for year 2021 and year 2041 are expected to be below 1.0 after
implementation of the full mass transit system in the study area. Thus if positive
intervention is made by providing metro on the proposed three corridors and regulated
bus transit on other roads, traffic levels on the road network are expected to be
manageable.
Table 9.18 Volume/Capacity Ratio on Various Roads in Study Area before and after
Implementation of the Full Mass Transport System
V/C Ratio
Road Only Network
(Business As Usual Scenario) With MTS Network
S.No Name of Road 2009* 2021** 2041** 2021# 2041#
1 Vidya Path 0.8 1.4 2.5 1.0 1.1
2 Udyan Path 0.7 1.0 1.8 0.3 0.9
3 Jan Marg 0.8 1.2 1.8 0.5 0.9
4 Himalaya Marg 0.7 1.8 3.2 0.5 0.8
5 Sarovar Path 0.8 1.3 2.4 0.4 0.9
6 Sukhna Path 0.8 1.2 2.2 0.5 1.0
7 Chandi Marg 0.6 1.0 1.8 0.2 0.5
8 Purv Marg 0.8 1.5 2.4 0.8 1.0
9 Madhya Marg 1.2 1.8 3.3 0.6 0.9
10 Udyog Path 1.1 1.8 3.2 0.3 0.8
11 Dakshin Marg 0.8 1.3 2.3 0.7 1.0
12 Between Sec 10 and 15 (Panchkula) 0.8 0.8 1.5 0.2 0.4
13 Between Sec 6 and city center (Panchkula) 0.3 0.9 1.4 0.4 0.8
14 Near Sec 1 Shimla Road (Panchkula) 0.8 1.2 2.2 0.7 0.9
15 NH-21 (Near Tribune Chowk) 0.7 1.1 2.0 0.7 1.0
Source: RITES Primary Survey 2008-09*
** By Traffic Projections
# V/C values by Assignments with MTS
CHAPTER – 10
10.1.1 Urban Transport Strategy can play an important role in tackling urban problems,
traffic congestion constraints and business efficiency which degrades the quality of
life. Urban Transport projects can reduce journey times and their unpredictability
yielding large savings of travel time and vehicle operating costs and thus release
city’s economic and social potential.
10.2.1 The Government of India has evolved a policy to overcome the problem of poor
mobility which dampens the economic growth and deterioration in the quality of
life. The approach is to deal with this rapidly growing problem as also it can offer
a clear direction and a framework for future action.
• To recognize that people occupy center-stage in our cities and all plans would
be for their common benefit and well being
• To make our cities the most livable in the world and enable them to become
the “engines of economic growth” that power India’s development in the 21st
century
• To allow our cities to evolve into an urban form that is best suited for the
unique geography of their locations and is best placed to support the main
social and economic activities that take place in the city.
10.2.2 The objective of this policy is to ensure safe, affordable, quick, comfortable,
reliable and sustainable access for the growing number of city residents to jobs,
education, recreation and such other needs within our cities. This is sought to be
achieved by:
10.3 VISION
produced by the imagination’. A transport planner’s vision for the city and
metropolitan area is to see ‘a well contained city with efficient people-friendly
transport system with minimum travel time & maximum safety and comfort’. At
the same time the facility provided should be optimally used. The vision as
envisaged for comprehensive mobility plan for Chandigarh urban complex is as
follows:
1. To improve connectivity and travel throughout the city and its region.
Goals for Comprehensive mobility plan for Chandigarh urban complex are as
follows
4. Integrated urban land use and transport system result in efficient and
sustainable mobility for everyone and provide greater accessibility to
opportunities (e.g employment, education, health, goods, and other services).
10.5.1 Analysis of existing transport scenario indicates lack of adequate traffic engineering
and management measures. It is, therefore, desirable to optimize the capacity of the
existing transport network by these measures which cost little and are easy to
implement. It will also be desirable to develop an institutionalized capability to
achieve these objectives because the existing organizational set up for traffic and
transport management lacks this capability.
10.6.1 The Chandigarh is growing fast in east, west and south directions. For the year
2021, it is envisaged that the additional population will be accommodated in existing
area considering the existing densities and extension of existing urban area. In order
to restrict the population of Chandigarh to 28 lakh by the year 2041, it is necessary
that satellite towns such as Panchkula, Mohali, Zirakpur, Kharar, Derabassi, Pinjore
Kalka Urban Complex , Mullapur and Baddi are to be developed in order to check
the immigration to Chandigarh.
10.7.1 The present modal split in favour of public transport is less than 20 percent. This is
due to the high growth rate in personalized motor vehicles, this share is likely to fall
more in the absence of effective public transport system. This will result in more
traffic on roads. Accordingly, it is suggested that the modal split should be increased
to about 60 to 70 percent in favour of public transport by providing a city-wide
integrated mass transport system network so that all the areas are within 500m of
mass transport system.
10.8.1 As already stated, forecast traffic assignment on the road network indicates heavy
passenger demand along Madhya Marg, Himalaya Marg, Purv Marg, Vikas Marg
and Dakshin Marg. On some of the road sections in coming years, the demand is
expected to be beyond the capacity of a road based public transport system. Major
changes in public transport take years to achieve. Just as people replace and upgrade
consumer goods when their incomes rise, so shall the community progressively
upgrade its public transport system. Following three staged strategy should be
adopted.
ii) Construction /upgradation of roads and investment in road based public transport
infrastructure to extend the capacity of public transport system as a medium
measure. Trunk routes where demands where demands are more than the
capacity of minibuses should be served by standard buses and other/feeder routes
by mini buses.
iii) As a long term measure, rail based mass transport system to serve trunk routes
while buses/mini buses providing the feeder services and operating on other less
dense routes.
10.8.2 The city of Chandigarh will not remain such and it can look ahead to a time when
the rail based public transport system will be viable. But as it develops, land will
become scarcer and it would be prudent to reserve land for it to allow for future
construction.
The strategy for improvement of road system has two components. First is the
actions which are short term in nature to maximize the capacity of existing road
network by traffic engineering and management measures as stated in para 10.4.
Second is for medium and long term requiring large investment in new infrastructure
to increase and extend the road system capacity. Traffic assignment for the year
2014 to 2041 on the existing road network indicates heavy demand along Madhya
Marg, Himalaya Marg, Purv Marg, Vikas Marg and Dakshin Marg. Desire of traffic
has shown a high proportion of through traffic to the city, which in the absence of
adequate bypasses uses city roads. This through traffic is expected to increase
manifold in the years to come and to siphon off this traffic from entering into the
city, construction of additional bypasses will be necessary. In addition, construction
of missing links, improvement/widening of radial roads and construction of new
roads at the urban periphery will be required to guide and support the expansion of
the city. Therefore, the road system will have to be gradually upgraded considering
the expected traffic volumes and their economic viability. The urban complex may
also require grade separators at junctions.
10.10 OBSERVATIONS
The important observations are as following, which will now guide the strategy for
development.
2. Pockets of economic activities like IT Park & Medi-city having very large
employment potential are planned. A large part of the human resources to be
engaged in these activities is expected to come from with in Chandigarh but
quite a large no. is also to the expected from the Panchkula, Mohali, Zirakpur
and even from towns like Kharar, Derabassi and Pinjore-kalka etc. This will
require special high capacity mass transport system connecting these work
centers with the living areas within Chandigarh, Panchkula, Mohali and
Zirakpur as well as meeting the needs of the long distance/suburban
commuters, especially along the corridors leading to these centers.
In order to prepare the Comprehensive Mobility Plan the following policy measures
are required to be taken based on which the mobility plan will be finalized.
1. Mass transport system to provide wide coverage and interchange facilities with
other modes of transport. As decided by Chandigarh Administration the metro
system will be underground on sections where aesthetics are important.
8. Special facilities for pedestrians within the entire network specially in the core
areas ; pedestrianisation of selected shopping streets in side the core area going
10. Improving Primary, Arterial and other important roads by providing grade
separation, junction improvements, adding missing links, widening and other
road side facilities wherever necessary. For road system also elevated structure
such as flyovers shall be avoided and underpass may be provided at critical
junctions.
CHAPTER- 11
IMMEDIATE/SHORT TERM TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENT
MEASURES
11.1 NEED
11.1.1 Increase in population and commercial activities coupled with high growth in vehicle
population and lack of effective public transport has resulted in falling mobility levels
on roads. Widening of roads is not possible at all places. Keeping in consideration the
transport strategy evolved for the city, the immediate need is to optimise the use of
available transport infrastructure by short term traffic engineering/management
measures.
Table 11.1 presents the existing and projected peak approach traffic volume in PCU
on the major intersection of the study area. Directional peak traffic flows are already
shown in Annexure 4.10. It can be seen from the table almost all the junctions except
one at Matka Chowk the peak approach traffic volume is more than 7000 PCU. It can
also be observed that share of straight moving traffic along a road to total approach
traffic volume is very high at most of the locations. The peak hour volume will exceed
beyond 10000 PCU by year 2014 at all these intersections.
11.3.2 Considering this grade separation has been proposed at the critical junctions along
major direction of traffic as presented in Table 11.2. Grade separator in the form of
underpass and retaining or introducing rotary to cater to balanced traffic at ground
level are considered appropriate. These measures will also help in maintaining the
aesthetics of Chandigarh and keep it green.
• Grade separation in the form of underpasses has been proposed along Madhya
Marg at Matka Chowk, K.C Cinema Chowk, at rotary of Sukhna Path and
Madhya Marg, Transport Nagar Chowk, Railway Station Chowk and
• Right turn ban on crossings of Sarovar path and Chandi Marg with Madhya
Marg making Madhya Marg signal free corridor up to Housing Board Chowk.
Effort has been made to retain the glory of Chandigarh by retaining the rotaries at all
grade separated junctions and by providing the rotaries at K.C Cinema Chowk,
Transport Nagar Chowk and Railway Station Chowk. Sixteen (16) Intersections as
shown in Figure 11.2 are proposed to be improved with following improvements
measures as listed in Table 11.2 below with schemes shown in Figure 11.3 to Figure
11.18. In addition to grade separation and geometric improvements at junctions
suitable provision of at grade pedestrian facilities at all junctions along and across by
provision of footpaths and pedestrian crossings has been made.
Proposed
S.N Name of Intersection Improvement Activities Completion
by Year
1 Near Chandigarh Housing Board Underpass along Madhya Marg and Geometric 2014
(Matka Chowk) Improvement
2 Underpass along Udyog Path and Geometric 2013
Cricket Stadium Rotary
Improvement
3 Rotary of Dakshin Marg and Jan Marg Underpass along Dakshin Marg and Geometric 2012
(Kisan Bhawan) Improvement
4 Underpass along Shanti Path and Geometric 2012
Sector 34 –Sector 35 Rotary
Improvements
5 Underpass along Dakshin Marg and Geometric 2012
Bhakra Colony Chowk
Improvement
6 Depressed Road across Sector Road, ban on few 2012
Aroma Hotel Chowk
turning movements and Geometric Improvement
7 Underpass along Udyog Path and Geometric 2011
Sector -17 ISBT Chandigarh
Improvement
8 Underpass along Madhya Marg and Geometric 2012
K.C Cinema Chowk (Press Chowk)
Improvement
9 Underpass along Madhya Marg and Geometric 2013
Rotary of Madhya Marg and Sukhna Path
Improvement
10 Underpass along Dakshin Marg and Geometric 2011
Rotary of Dakshin Marg and Sukhna Path
Improvement
11 Rotary of Dakshin Marg & Poorvi Marg Underpass along Dakshin Marg and Geometric 2011
Near Sector – 31 (Tribune Chowk) Improvement
12 Underpass along Madhya Marg and Geometric 2011
Transport Nagar Chowk (Timber Market)
Improvement
13 Flyover along Madhya Marg and Geometric 2011
Chandigarh Railway Station Chowk
Improvement
14 Underpass across Madhya Marg, ban on few 2011
Housing Board Chowk
turning movements and Geometric Improvement
15 Right turn ban from Madhya Marg and Sarovar 2011
Rotary of Sarovar Path and Madhya Marg
Path
16 Right turn ban from Madhya Marg and Chandi 2011
Rotary of Chandi Marg and Madhya Marg
Marg
11.3.5 By the year 2014, when the proposed mass transport system is in position, the traffic
levels at these junctions will fall and intersection improvement measures will be
sufficient to take care of the road traffic
The parking demand is growing with growth of vehicles in the city. The multistoried
buildings in busy/commercial areas are major attractors. This results in the vehicle
parking spilling to streets (main road or side streets). At most locations parking
demand outstrips supply. A practical solution is to provide off street multistoried
parking lots in this areas. Once such facility is provided it is possible to prevent the
on-street parking of vehicles or otherwise road space can be utilized for traffic. In
light of the above five (5) Automatic Multilevel Parking (AMP) are proposed in
different sectors of Chandigarh shown in Figure 11.19. All the above sites have
limited land availability and the land values are very high, therefore Automatic
Mechanical Parking (AMP) which can provide 1500 parking lots in approx. 4048 sqm
of space have been suggested with time based parking charges. Parking for about
4500 vehicles has been suggested for the short term at the following sites in Table
11.3. AMP at other locations as given in chapter 12 can be taken up later.
Capacity Total To be
No. of per parking Capacity Implemented
Parking Facilities Type Phasing Units lot (in ECS) by Year
2 plots of 1 acre each in
Sector 17 Chandigarh for AMP PH 1 2 1500 3000 2012
Multilevel Parking
1 acre of Parking site in
Sector 34 for Multilevel AMP PH 1 1 1500 1500 2012
Parking
3 Total ECS 4500
Their use in Chandigarh is not significant but still this needs to be encouraged on
environmental considerations. Provision for safer and better section of road or cycle
track is the best way to keep them on roads. Therefore, it is proposed to revive V – 7
roads as intended for bicycles in the master plan of Chandigarh. About 60 Km of
cycle network has been identified with proposed cycle underpasses across V -2 or V –
3 roads. In addition the existing cycle tracks along V3 roads will be improved and
provided with proper integration along with the zebra crossing near intersection.
These proposals are shown in Figure 11.20.
Pedestrians form a major proportion of commuters. Not only trips are conducted by
walk in its entirety but every public transport trip will also have component of walk at
its both ends. Though they are short distance travelers, they are spread all over the
city. As facilities furnished for them are encroached upon by vendors or for road
space, they have to spill on roads. These contribute to accidents also. One alternative
for their facility and controlling their spill on roads is to provide good footpath with
railings covering about two meters width on either side of the road with openings at
desired crossing points. Another alternative is to develop some narrow roads
especially adjacent to major arterials as “pedestrians only” roads. Bus bays and foot
paths at bus stops can also help in restraining their spill on to carriageways and
reducing accidents. Pedestrian subways at proposed Metro and BRT stations are
planned and the cost is included in the civil cost of the proposed mass transport
system. At the junctions proposed for improvement at grade pedestrian facilities are
planned and cost is included in the junction improvement proposals.
The choice between lift/escalator operated underpasses will depend upon the specific
site conditions and the quantum of pedestrian traffic while undertaking the detailed
feasibility studies.
It has been observed that most of the footpaths along the major arterial and sub
arterial roads need extensive repairs and up gradations. The major problems observed
are:
Insufficient widths (< 1.5 meters.)
Uneven surface because of settlement of base course, improper covering of
service lines, manholes etc.
Level difference and steep risers with junctions of roads.
It has been estimated that footpaths along 220 km of roads are required to be taken up.
The basic principles for construction of new footpaths and improvement of existing
ones are as under:
Footpaths along existing roads should be widened and the minimum width be
kept at least 2.0 meters.
Proper levelling of footpath surface – with a stable base course fully compacted
and safe guarded against any settlement before laying the top surface. In
addition the cover for the underground services and man holes, if any, located
below the footpaths or crossing should be properly designed to maintain a
proper level with the surface of the footpath and no subsidence occurs.
Continuity of footpaths
Adequate ramp facilities for physically challenged people at junctions and cross
over.
Proper merger of footpaths with underpasses/zebra crossings and junctions be
provided with pedestrian priority signalling.
CHAPTER – 12
12.1.2 While framing proposals priority has been given to public transport and non-
motorized transport such as pedestrian facilities. For the balance travel demand, road
improvement proposals have been formulated. The details of these proposals are
given in the following paragraphs.
12.3.1 Table 12.1 gives the proposed metro corridors for Chandigarh Urban Complex to
cater to the demand on major directions of travel. A total of 58 Km of metro network
has been proposed. The proposed metro system may be implemented in two phases.
The first phase may consist of three corridors in Chandigarh city only with a length
of 40.7 Km. As decided by the Governments, the metro system will be underground
in aesthetics sensitive areas. Therefore, about 15.7 Km of this system in Chandigarh
may be underground and 25 Km elevated in Phase I. This phase may be
implemented by 2014. In the Phase II the metro system may be extended to Mohali
(12 Km) and Panchkula (5Km) which may be entirely elevated. The Phase II may be
implemented after 2021. The exact length of the underground and elevated sections
will be firmed up at the stage of preparation of Detailed Project Report.
Total 17 17
Total Length (km) 15.7 42 57.7
12.3.2 The above corridors will be able to adequately cater to the future projected traffic
within the core areas and its immediate neighborhood. The metro corridors are also
shown in Figure 12.1.
12.4.1 Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)/ High Capacity Bus System (HCBS) is a high quality, ultra
modern, customer oriented transit option that can deliver fast, comfortable and cost-
effective urban mobility, quite similar to Metro rail. BRT incorporates most of the
high quality aspects of metro system without high investments. BRT is an integrated
system of facilities, equipment services and amenities that improves the speed,
reliability, and identity of bus transit. The main features of BRT system include the
following:
12.4.2 BRT can easily handle passenger flow in the range of about 4000 to 20000
passengers per hour per direction – depending upon the lanes (number, type)
dedicated to bus system. Considering the expected traffic demand on various
corridors, two types of BRT are suggested. The corridors where the demand is upto
20000 PHPDT and road ROW available is 60m, BRT type I is suggested. This BRT
will have space of 2 lanes for BRT system on each side and will have priority at
signalized junctions and/or grade separation at junctions. The BRT corridors where
the maximum expected demand is expected to be around 10000 PHPDT and ROW
availability is 60m, one lane of BRT on each side may be given. However space for
another lane may be kept for widening in future. On the corridors where the
expected demand is likely to be less than 10000 PHPDT and road ROW available is
30 m, BRT type II is suggested. The type II BRT will have one lane reserved for
BRT on each side with priority at signalized junctions. As roads in Chandigarh
Urban Complex do not have problem of side friction due to commercial activities on
road side, it is proposed to have BRT system lane on sides of the road instead of
central lane. Typical cross-section of both types of BRT is shown in Figure 12.3 and
Figure 12.4.
12.4.3 Accordingly taking into consideration the various Master Plans development
proposals and the likely travel demand as explained in Chapter 9, BRT system along
the various corridors is proposed as shown in Table 12.2 and Figure 12.2.
All the above mentioned corridors are proposed to be taken up by year 2021. The
Commuter Rail network proposal is shown in Figure 12.5
12.6.1 While the metro system and the high capacity BRT will be operational on selected
routes where substantial right of way is available, the major areas will in any case
continue to be served by local bus system which will also act as the most important
feeder system to the Metro and BRT. In addition to improving the fleet capacity,
rationalization of routes, improvement in traffic management at the junctions
including priority signaling for buses, provision of proper road side bus stops and
integration points with the Metro, and BRT will provide effective use of the bus
system. CTU shall continue to play a vital and leading role in public transport in
any scenario of the City’s development.
12.6.2 At present the CTU is operating approximately 417 buses, 209 buses run on
local/suburban routes, 208 buses run on Interstate routes covering Punjab, Haryana,
Himachal, U.P., Uttaranchal, Rajasthan, Delhi & J & K. CTU buses travel
approx.1.30 lakh kilometers per day and approx.1.5 lakh commuters commutes daily
in CTU Buses.
By the year 2015, despite the position that there may be Metro and BRT, still the
feeder bus services and bus services on the other less dense corridors will be run
through the city bus system only. It is expected that 12.55 Lakh trips per day by
2021 and 26.7 Lakh trips per day by 2041 on BRT and other bus system will be
performed in Chandigarh Urban Complex. For this volume of traffic at least 1250
buses will be required by year 2021 and 2570 buses will be required by year 2041.
However, this number may have to be increased substantially in case any of the
MRT components lag behind in implementation. It is further pointed out that just
increase in fleet is not enough, its quality will also have to be of much higher
BUS TERMINAL
Existing
Sector 17 Chandigarh
Sector 43 Chandigarh
Sector 62 Mohali
Sector 5 Panchkula
Proposed (by 2021)
Sector 104 Mohali
Sector 31 Chandigarh
Mani Majra
In addition to the above terminals BRT terminals are also proposed for Intracity
movement at the origin and destination of the BRT corridors and will also act as
inter modal interchanges between regional and local traffic.
12.7.3 All the Intercity and Intra-city bus terminals would be the center for tourist buses,
with adequate parking facilities and tourist bureaus / offices etc as well as other
tourist infrastructure for operation of private tour operators.
At present all the buses whether inter-city, inter-state or intra-city use depots at
industrial area Phase I workshop and Sector 25 CTU workshop. To meet the future
demands of buses five more Bus depots have been proposed at Police Housing
Complex, Pocket E Mohali in Phase I, Sector 48 Chandigarh, Sector 1A Panchkula
and Sector 104 Mohali, Accordingly it is suggested that at present existing 3 bus
depots will be improved with all depot facilities immediately and two new are to be
positioned in place by 2014 and three after 2021 located at the following places as
given in Table 12.5.
A multi-modal mass transport network consisting of metro rail, BRT, commuter rail
system and normal city bus system for the Chandigarh Urban Complex and its
linkages to nearby towns has been proposed to be developed to meet expected
commuter’s travel needs. This integrated multi-modal mass transport system
network is shown in Figure 12.7. Integration of various modes of transport is vital
to evolution of a least-cost and viable transport system. Objective of an integrated
transport system is to offer maximum advantage from economic, traffic and
planning considerations. Various transport modes have been integrated in such a
way that each mode supplements the other. It is not possible to provide direct origin
to destination service and vice a versa for all commuters. The need to interchange
modes and or corridors is an essential feature of any public transport system. The
planning objective is to minimize the need to change and when change is essential to
make it as convenient as possible and with minimum time loss. Depending upon the
Feeder services to the proposed network will also be important in order to provide
convenient and quick transfer of passengers from one mode of transport to other. As
all commuters will not be living within walking distance of the proposed network,
proper planning for feeder services will be necessary to ensure the forecast
passenger demand on the system. For catchment area of about 0.5-1 km from the
proposed network, commuter can easily access it by walk. People residing in next 1-
km can reach station by cycles, scooters, auto-rickshaws and mini-buses. Areas
outside the 2-km catchment area will require regular feeder bus services to important
terminals/stations. Feeder services can also be provided by para-transit modes.
12.8.3 Inter-Change Facilities
One of the most important elements of transport integration is the provision of inter-
change facilities. Required inter-changes will be between the proposed mass transit
systems such Metro, CRS, BRT and with other feeder services. Integration facilities
at stations would depend upon expected station load to ensure proper system
utilization. This will also include approach roads to stations, circulation facilities,
pedestrian ways and adequate parking areas for various modes that are likely to
come to important stations including feeder, bus/mini-bus routes. The provision will
have to be made for peak demand at each station. At either stations, proper road
based integration is to be ensured.
12.8.4 Figure 12.7 shows the interchange points in the mass transport network. There are
29 locations of interchange (17 major and 12 minor) between the various subsystems
of mass transport network.
One unique feature in the layout of Chandigarh is its roads, classified in accordance
with their functions. An integrated system of seven roads was designed to ensure
efficient traffic circulation. Corbusier referred to these as the 7’ Vs. The city’s vertical
roads run northeast/ southwest (The ‘Paths’) and the horizontal roads run
northwest/southeast (‘The Margs’). They intersect at right angles, forming a grid of
network for movement. This arrangement of road-use leads to a remarkable hierarchy of
movement, which also ensures that the residential areas segregated from the noise and
pollution of traffic. The functional hierarchies of roads in Chandigarh are explained
below
V-1 Roads connecting Chandigarh with other cities like Ambala, Kharar and
Shimla. They have dual carriageway, good tree plantation and
distinctive central verge lighting. The Madhya Marg and Dakshin Marg
are two roads, which merge into V-1s leading the Kalka and Ambala,
respectively.
V-2 They are the major avenues of Chandigarh, with important institutional
and commercial functions running alongside. In Chandigarh they are
identifiable as ‘Marg’, Madhya Marg,Dakshin Marg, Jan Marg,
Himalaya Marg, Uttar Marg and Purv Marg are important examples.
V-3 They are the corridor- streets for fast moving vehicular traffic. A sector
is surrounded either by V-2 of V-3 roads.
V-4 Roads bisecting the Sector with shopping complex located along their
southern edge.
V-5 Roads meandering through the sector giving access to its inner lands.
V-6 Roads coming off of the V-5s and leading to the residential houses.
V-7 They are intended for pedestrian movement and run through the middle
of the sector in the green areas.
V-8 They are intended to run parallel with V-7s for the bi-cycles. Not
properly developed, as yet.
12.9.2 The present road network consists of the sector roads and major highway corridors.
In addition quite a few proposals are being planned by Govt. agencies like
Engineering Department, NHAI, State PWD, HUDA, GMADA and PUDA along
with the private sector. It is necessary to integrate / superimpose all these proposals
in the light of projected travel demand for road traffic and confirm that they are in
conformity with each other and there is neither conflict nor duplication. Considering
the existing and future transport demand and proposed mass transport system, the
balanced demand should be catered by a well developed road system. The road
improvement proposals include road widening, New roads (bypasses and other
roads), grade separators (road flyovers/underpasses, ROBs, RUBs) etc. These
proposals are explained below.
The entire traffic from the sectors, the region and even beyond converges on to the
V-2 and V-3 roads. Most of the V-2 and V-3 roads will suffer from congestion
because of increasing use of private modes (Cars and 2-wheeler) resulting in over
utilization of their limited capacity. In addition the limited carriageway, the
inefficiency of the junctions and their incapability to handle the volumes of traffic
will further reduce the capacity of the road systems. Accordingly it has found
necessary that quite a few roads listed in the Table 12.6 below will require
improvement through widening 4 – 6 lane carriageway in order to cater to projected
road traffic up to the year 2021. In addition at some of the critical junctions where
normal signaling cannot effectively manage the traffic volumes, grade separators
(Underpasses/flyovers) are proposed where the traffic demand far exceeds the
capacity and at grade expansion is not possible due to restriction of available
carriageway. Also at road crossings with railway lines, at some places Road Over
bridges & or Road under Bridges are proposed. The junctions requiring grade
separators (underpasses/flyover) have already been given in Table 11.2 in Chapter
11. List of ROB’s and RUBs are indicated in Table 12.7 below.
In addition to the above roads, a few small links are required to cater to the
important activity areas from the major existing network Accordingly the new roads
links within the study area, regional linkages, Expressway and other new links
proposed to be taken up are as listed in Table 12.8 below.
In addition to the above roads, some major highways connecting the Chandigarh
Urban Complex needs upgradation and widening are identified which are required
to cater to the important activity areas from the major existing network Accordingly
the new regional linkages, and Expressway proposed to be taken up are as listed in
Table 12.9 below and shown in Figure 12.9.
Phasing of
S.no Upgradation & Widenning Length in Km Implementation
NH-64 Banur-Zirakpur highway - 4 laning (dual C/W) of existing
1 2014
2lane single C/W 17
2 NH-64 Banur-Zirakpur highway - 4 laning (dual C/W) to 6 laning 2021
NH-21A Pinjore-Baddi-Nalagarh highway - 4 laning (dual C/W) of
3 2014
existing 2lane single C/W
35
NH-21A Pinjore-Baddi-Nalagarh highway - 4 laning (dual C/W) to
4 2021
Six laning
PGI -Khuda Lahora-Mullapur - GMADA Expressway (4 lane dual
5 2014
carriageway extendable to 6 lane in 2021with ROW 150m) 12.5
Total 64.5
Proposed By passes
1 GMADA Expressway- connecting Baddi-Kharar-Mohali-Bannur- 76 2014
Derabassi-NH 73 (4 lane dual carriageway with ROW 150m)
2 By pass from NH-73 (Near Barwala) - NH 22 (beyond Parwanu)-NH- 46 2014
21 A (4 lane dual carriageway with ROW 150m)
Total 122
Grand Total 186.5
In addition, since most of the inter city bus terminals are proposed to be adequately
served by public transport like Metro and BRT substantial park and ride facilities
should be provided from where the commuters can switch over from private to
public transport.
Similarly at all the terminal of Metro, BRT, CRS and their major stations should be
provided with adequate park and ride facilities.
In the long run, when the mass transport system is city-wide and adequate, parking
demand will stabilize. Therefore, it is important that adequate and convenient mass
transport system as recommended by this report should be provided.
12.11.1The freight movement through the city particularly on some of the arterials is
already restricted in CBD area. At present all the good traffic concentrates at Sector
26 Transport Nagar. To decongest the existing Transport Nagar it is proposed to
provide three new IFCs at the periphery of the tricity complex, with all facilities of
wholesale markets, loading /unloading facilities, parking, workshops etc. Heavy
goods traffic entering the tricity complex would be stopped there itself and
light/small goods carrier vehicle will be used to transfer goods within the complex.
The provision of GMADA expressway is itself going to help diversion of through
freight traffic.
12.11.2 The three IFC’s proposed in the periphery of tricity as shown in Table 12.11 and
Figure 12.11
In addition to acting as nodes for handling the good traffic they will also act as
center for wholesale trade. Quite a few wholesale markets to be shifted outside the
central area can be located as part of the IFC for efficient handling for bulk goods.
CHAPTER – 13
COST ESTIMATES
13.1 UNIT RATES
13.1.1 The Traffic and Transportation Plan comprising proposals for public/mass transport
system, inter-city bus terminals, pedestrian facilities, parking facilities, road
infrastructure, integrated freight complexes, transport system management measures
etc has been prepared for the Chandigarh Urban Complex to cater to travel demand
up to the year 2041 at an acceptable level of service as explained in Chapter 9. In
order to know the financial implications of these proposals, block cost estimates
have been worked out in this chapter. Unit rates adopted for items at 2009 prices are
given in Table 13.1.
13.2.1 Considering the various proposed schemes and unit rates, cost estimates of these
schemes have been worked out at 2009 prices and are given for Proposed Mass
Transport Corridors, City Bus System, Road Infrastructure, Grade Separators,
Pedestrian Facilities, Parking Facilities, Integrated Freight Complexes and Transport
System Management Measures in Tables 13.2 to 13.14 respectively. The entire
transport development plan is not required to be implemented in one go.
Considering the existing problems, expected traffic demand levels and schemes
already under implementation/ active consideration of the Government, phasing of
implementation of various projects has been suggested in two phases Phase I (upto
2021) and Phase II (Upto 2021-2041). Cost estimates for each project to be
implemented in the two phases have also been given in the tables.
Unit Cost/Km
Chandigarh Punjab Haryana Total
Excluding Total Cost
S.No Corridor Phasing (Length in (Length (Length Length
Buses (Rs Crore)
Km) in Km) in Km) (Km)
(Rs Crore)
From Police PH I
Housing
1 Complex Via 12 6 18 20 360
Dakshin Marg
to Zirakpur
Sukhna Lake to PH I
Sector - 49
along Sukhna
2 9 11 20 5 100
Path via Sector
62 SAS Nagar
to Kharar
PGI to Pocket F PH I
SAS Nagar
3 8.5 2.5 11 5 55
along Vidya
Path
Sector 49 to
Sector 87 City
4 9 9 5 45
Center SAS
Nagar PH II
Zirakpur to
5 8 8 20 160
Derabassi PH II
Pocket F SAS
6 Nagar to 20 20 15 300
Chatbir PH II
Kharar to
7 18 18 15 270
Bannur PH II
Zirakpur to
Sector 1
8 Panchkula to 3.5 10.5 14 15 210
Housing Board
Chowk PH II
Mansa Devi
Urban Complex
to Sector 28
Panchkula
9 23 23 15 345
Extension via
sector 5 City
Center
Panchkula PH II
Industrial Area
Ph 2 Panchkula
10 to Dakshin 4 4 5 20
Marg Along
route no 2 PH II
TOTAL 29.5 78 37.5 145 1865
Table 13.7 Cost Estimates of Improvement of Existing/Proposed Inter State Bus Terminal
Bus Terminal Phasing Unit cost (Rs Crore) Total cost (Rs Crore)
Existing
Sector 17 Chandigarh PH I 5 5
Sector 43 Chandigarh PH I 5 5
Sector 62 Mohali PH I 5 5
Sector 5 Panchkula PH I 5 5
Proposed
Sector 104 Mohali PH II 45 45
Sector 31 Chandigarh PH II 45 45
Mani Majra PH II 45 45
Total (Rs Crore) 155
Integrated Freight Complex Phasing Unit cost (Rs Crore) Total cost (Rs Crore)
Existing
Sector 26 Chandigarh PH I 5 5
Proposed
Sector 102 Mohali PH II 45 45
Along Dakhin Marg Near Raipur
Khurd PH II 45 45
Sector 1A Panchkula PH II 45 45
Total (Rs Crore) 140
Corridor Existing Proposed Addl. Upgraded Unit Cost per Total Cost
Improvement Phasing lanes lanes Lanes Length in Km lane (Rs Crore) (Rs Crore)
Name of Road
Udyan Path 2 and 4 D /
4 2 0.5 0.5 0.5
PH II UD
Jan Marg 4 and 6 D
6 2 5.6 0.5 5.6
PH II
Sarovar Path PH II 3 and 4 UD 4 1 1.4 0.5 0.7
Chandi Path PH II 4to 6 D /UD 6 2 7 0.5 7
Uttar Marg PH II 4 UD 4
Vigyan Path PH II 2 and 3 4 1 3 0.5 1.5
3 to 4 D/
4 1 1.3 0.5 0.65
Udyog Path PH II UD
Total Cost
18.8 15.95
(Rs Crore)
S.No Rail Over Bridges / RUBs Phasing Unit Cost (Rs Crore) Total Cost (Rs Crore)
Panchkula -Zirakpur Road (On PH I
1 Ambala Kalka Railway Line) 20 20
New Panchkula Road (Ambala - PH I
2 Kalka Railwayl Line) 20 20
Total 40
13.3.1 Summary of the cost estimates for various regional projects is given in Table 13.15.
This Plan is in addition to the above plan which has to be taken up by Ministry of
Railways for Commuter Rail and NHAI for Highways. Overall cost of the entire
plan is estimated as Rs 5615 Crore of which Rs 2300 Crore (Phase I - Rs 700 Crore
and Phase II - Rs 1600 Crore) is for Commuter Rail. Up gradation and widening of
existing National Highway is about Rs 645 Crore (Phase I - Rs 385 Crore and Phase
II - Rs 260 Crore). For proposed new bypasses/new roads Rs 2670 Crore in Phase I.
Total 65 645
Proposed Road By pass / New Roads
GMADA Expressway- connecting Baddi-Kharar- 2014
Mohali-Bannur-Derabassi-NH 73 76 20 1520
By pass from NH-73 (NearBarwala) - NH 22 2014
(beyond Prawanoo)-NH-21 A 46 25 1150
13.4.1 Overall cost for various proposed projects in Chandigarh Urban Complex and
Regional Transport Projects is estimated as Rs 21253 Crore.
13.4.2 Summary of the cost estimates for various projects in Chandigarh Urban Complex is
given in Table 13.16. Overall cost of the entire plan is estimated as Rs 15638 Crore
of which Rs 10926 Crore is proposed for upto year 2021. Cost of the projects
proposed in Phase II is Rs 4712 Crore.
Table 13.16 Summary of Cost Estimates for various T& T Plan Phase wise at 2009 Prices
for Chandigarh Urban Complex
13.4.3 Summary of the cost estimates for various projects state wise is given in Table
13.17. Overall cost of the entire plan is estimated as Rs 15638 Crore of which Rs
11452.75 Crore is to be borne by Chandigarh, Rs 2867 Crore by Punjab and Rs
1317.8 Crore by Haryana.
Table 13.17 Summary of Cost Estimates of for various Proposals at 2009 Prices State
wise – Chandigarh Urban Complex
CHAPTER 14
14.1 INTRODUCTION
14.1.1 Rail based mass transit systems are characterised by heavy capital investments coupled
with long gestation periods leading to low financial rates of return although the economic
benefits to the society are immense. Such systems generate externalities which do not get
captured in monetary terms and, therefore, do not flow back to the system. This situation
leads to a relative independence between costs & benefits. The economic and social
considerations enable the government to invest funds in this sector. Decisions regarding
investment in this are not easy because not only are the initial investments prohibitive the
returns too are uncertain.
14.1.2 Considering above, an attempt has been made to carry out preliminary economic and
financial appraisal of the Phase I of Chandigarh Metro. This economic and financial
appraisal is given below. It may be mentioned that both economic and financial analyses
have been carried out at 2009 prices and impact of inflation on both costs and
benefits/revenues has not been taken.
14.2.1 The proposed three metro corridors for Phase I are entirely in Chandigarh as described in
Chapter 12 and are again listed in Table 14.1. Block cost estimates for Chandigarh Metro
Phase I have been considered covering civil, electrical, signaling and telecommunications
works, rolling stock, maintenance facilities etc at 2009 price level and given in Table
14.1.
14.2.2 The above project is proposed to completed in 4 years and the first year of operation is
taken as 2014-15. Expected year wise funds requirement during the 4 years is given in
Table 14.2.
14.2.2 The additional investment provided to take care of increased requirement of Rolling
Stock and related costs and the replacement costs have to be provided during the
operation of metro on account of replacement of equipment due to wear and tear.
14.3.1 The Operation & Maintenance costs can be divided into two major parts:
i. Civil infrastructure
ii. System
14.3.2 Annual O &M cost for civil structure and system has been taken as 1% of total capital
cost of civil infrastructure and 4% of capital cost of system. The total O&M cost in
the year 2014-15 is expected to be Rs. 177.78 Crore at 2009 prices. The year-wise
O&M costs are as indicated in Table 14.3 below:
2014-15 177.78
2015-16 179.55
2016-17 181.35
2017-18 183.16
2018-19 184.99
2019-20 186.84
2020-21 188.71
2021-22 190.60
2022-23 192.50
2023-24 194.43
2024-25 196.37
2025-26 198.34
2026-27 200.32
2027-28 202.32
2028-29 204.35
2029-30 309.59
2030-31 312.68
2031-32 315.81
2032-33 318.97
2033-34 322.16
2034-35 325.38
2035-36 328.63
2036-37 331.92
2037-38 335.24
2038-39 338.59
2039-40 341.98
2040-41 345.40
2041-42 348.85
2042-43 352.34
2043-44 355.86
As indicated in Chapter 9, the Chandigarh Phase I Metro corridors are expected to carry
2.70 lakh passengers in 2014, 3.90 lakh passengers in 2021, 5.80 lakh passengers in 2031
and 7.90 lakh passengers in 2041.
14.5.1 General
14.5.1.1 The proposed metro system will have significant impact on the urban environment and
quality of life. The metro system is expected to impart benefits to the economy by way of
cost efficiency, reduction in vehicular pollution, safety of passengers, and reduction in
congestion on the existing road network. This necessitates that metro investments are
appraised taking into account these impacts. That is why only financial analysis alone is
not adequate appraisal method and economic analysis needs to be undertaken.
14.5.1.2 The implementation of rail-based Mass Rapid Transit System will result in reduction of
the number of buses and vehicles on the road and increase in the journey speed of road-
based vehicles. This is expected to generate substantial benefits to the economy as a
whole in terms of reduction in fuel consumption, vehicle operating costs, and passenger
time. In addition, there will be reduction in road accidents and atmospheric pollution.
Other benefits include reduction in noise, increase in mobility levels, improvement in
quality of life and general economic growth.
Economic analysis for the metro system has been carried out within the framework of
“with” and “without” the project. The “without the project” situation assesses the cost to
the economy in case the projected volume of traffic continues to move with the prevailing
modes of transport. The “with the project” situation estimates the total costs that the
economy would have to bear for introducing the metro. The cost under the above two
situations has been evaluated in terms of market prices and then in economic terms,
deriving the latter from the former by converting market prices into appropriate shadow
prices. This has been done to iron out distortions due to externalities and anomalies
arising in real world pricing systems.
14.5.3.1 The impact of the proposed project on the economy has been appraised keeping the
following constituents of cost and benefit streams:
Cost streams
a. Capital cost of infrastructure (civil engineering, track, power supply, signaling
and telecommunication etc.) and rolling stock fleet for the metro, including
additional capital cost and replacement costs.
b. Operating cost of the metro
RITES LTD Page 4 of 14
Comprehensive Mobility Plan for Chandigarh Urban Complex
DRAFT FINAL REPORT – July 2009 Chapter 14 – Economic and Financial Appraisal for Chandigarh Metro
Benefit streams
The introduction of the metro will yield tangible and non-tangible savings due to
equivalent reduction in road traffic and certain socio-economic benefits. These include
savings in road construction and maintenance, vehicle operating costs, travel time and
other socio-economic benefits of travel time, better accessibility, better comfort and
quality of life, increase in mobility etc.
14.5.3.2 Quantification of some of the social benefits has not been attempted because universally
acceptable norms do not exist to facilitate such an exercise. However, it has been
considered appropriate to highlight the same, as given below:
14.5.3.4 Measuring the economic cost and benefits of a project involves adjusting the actual
expenditures on inputs where the prices paid do not properly reflect the real scarcity
value of the inputs. Such adjustments of market prices involve the determination of
“shadow prices”. In a developing economy like India, externalities exist in varying
degrees and the market is characterized by rigidities, market imperfections etc. leading
to distortions in the pricing system. Functioning of the economy is determined by the
joint effect of domestic demand and supply conditions and Government fiscal, trade
and tariff policies including non-economic institutional and allied factors e.g. in labour
and capital market. It is necessary, therefore, to eliminate the effect on prices of
elements like subsidies, taxes and duties which are actually transfer payments and other
distortions like foreign exchange rate and wage rate. This has been brought about by
applying appropriate shadow prices to market prices. The factors used for converting
project inputs and outputs to economic costs are as under:
14.5.3.5.1 Vehicle operating costs (VOC) saved on account of shifting from road vehicles to the
metro
Introduction of the metro is expected to shift travel to mass transport system and
consequently there will be drastic reduction in use of private and public transport (bus
and para-transit modes). Due to reduction in use of these modes, there will be savings
to the economy on account of less vehicle operating costs. The Vehicle Operating Cost
savings on account of overall reduced road vehicles estimated for horizon years 2011,
2021, and 2031 are expected as under:
Consequent to the introduction of MTS, the decongestion effect of road vehicles will be
experienced in the influence zone of MRTS. This will increase average speed of road
vehicles (buses, cars, 2-wheelers etc.) and thus will be required to spend less time on
road for same distance covered, thus reducing the vehicle operating costs. The savings
in VOC due decongestion effect is estimated as follows.
With the introduction of the metro , not only the passengers traveling by the metro but
also others traveling by buses and other vehicles will commute at faster speeds. The
time saving has been converted to equivalent monetary benefit to economy/society. The
savings on account of passenger time saved is estimated to be as under:
There will be substantial benefits arising out of reduced air pollution, with the
introduction of the metro due to less road vehicles and decongestion effect. These
benefits in monetary terms are given as follows.
14.5.4.1 The cost and benefit streams for 34-year period in terms of economic prices have been
worked out for the metro. The total cost worked out on the above basis is then
subtracted from the total benefits to estimate the net benefit of the project. This flow is
then subjected to the process of discounting to work out the economic internal rate of
return (EIRR) on the project, to examine the viability of the project in economic terms.
14.5.4.2 Cost and benefit streams are given in Table 14.4. The EIRR in economic terms works
out to 12.86 % for the metro project. It is accordingly seen that the proposed project is
economically viable.
14.5.5 Conclusion
14.5.5.1 The economic internal rate of return of 12.86 % for the Chandigarh Metro project is
above the cut-off criterion of 12% as prescribed by Planning Commission for
infrastructure projects, implying that the economic benefits accruing out of this project
are substantial and will yield high savings to the economy as a whole.
14.5.5.2 Based on the above criterion, the project may be taken for implementation.
Table 14.4. Economic Internal Rate of Return for Chandigarh Metro Phase I
(Rs Crore)
SN Year Capital Cost/ O&M Total Out VOC Saving of VOC saving due Passeng Savings Total Net
Additional cost/ Cost Flow vehicles due to to Decongestion er time due to savings Cash
Replacement cost shifting to effect on balance savings Less flow
metro road traffic pollution
1 2010-2011 764.58 764.58 -764.6
2 2011-2012 1911.44 1911.44 -1911.4
3 2012-2013 2293.73 2293.73 0.00 -2293.7
4 2013-2014 2676.01 2676.01 0.00 -2676.0
5 2014-2015 142.22 142.22 344.33 184.01 287.94 132.05 948.33 806.1
6 2015-2016 143.64 143.64 365.52 193.04 302.31 139.63 1000.51 856.9
7 2016-2017 145.08 145.08 388.02 202.52 317.40 147.65 1055.59 910.5
8 2017-2018 146.53 146.53 411.90 212.46 333.25 156.12 1113.73 967.2
9 2018-2019 128 147.99 275.49 437.26 222.89 349.88 165.09 1175.12 899.6
10 2019-2020 149.47 149.47 464.17 233.83 367.35 174.56 1239.91 1090.4
11 2020-2021 150.97 150.97 492.74 245.31 385.69 184.58 1308.32 1157.4
12 2021-2022 152.48 152.48 523.07 257.35 404.94 195.18 1380.54 1228.1
13 2022-2023 154.00 154.00 542.67 265.53 419.04 202.22 1429.45 1275.4
14 2023-2024 128 155.54 283.04 563.00 273.96 433.62 209.51 1480.09 1197.0
15 2024-2025 157.10 157.10 584.10 282.66 448.72 217.06 1532.54 1375.4
16 2025-2026 158.67 158.67 605.98 291.64 464.34 224.89 1586.85 1428.2
17 2026-2027 160.26 160.26 628.69 300.90 480.50 233.00 1643.09 1482.8
18 2027-2028 161.86 161.86 652.24 310.46 497.23 241.40 1701.33 1539.5
19 2028-2029 383 163.48 290.98 676.68 320.32 514.54 250.10 1761.64 1470.7
20 2029-2030 247.67 247.67 702.03 330.49 532.45 259.12 1824.09 1576.4
21 2030-2031 250.15 250.15 728.34 340.99 550.99 268.46 1888.77 1638.6
22 2031-2032 252.65 252.65 755.62 351.82 570.17 278.14 1955.75 1703.1
23 2032-2033 255.17 255.17 757.26 363.20 586.49 284.92 1991.87 1736.7
24 2033-2034 128 257.73 385.23 758.90 374.96 603.27 291.87 2029.00 1643.8
25 2034-2035 260.30 260.30 760.55 387.09 620.53 298.99 2067.16 1806.9
26 2035-2036 262.91 262.91 762.20 399.62 638.29 306.28 2106.38 1843.5
27 2036-2037 265.54 265.54 763.85 412.55 656.56 313.75 2146.70 1881.2
28 2037-2038 268.19 268.19 765.50 425.90 675.34 321.40 2188.14 1920.0
29 2038-2039 638 270.87 398.37 767.16 439.68 694.67 329.23 2230.75 1832.4
30 2039-2040 273.58 273.58 768.82 453.91 714.55 337.26 2274.55 2001.0
31 2040-2041 276.32 276.32 770.49 468.60 735.00 345.49 2319.58 2043.3
32 2041-2042 279.08 279.08 772.16 483.77 756.03 353.91 2365.87 2086.8
33 2042-2043 281.87 281.87 773.83 499.42 777.66 362.54 2413.46 2131.6
34 2043-2044 284.69 284.69 775.51 515.59 799.92 371.38 2462.40 2177.7
EIRR = 12.86%
RITES LTD Page 8 of 14
Comprehensive Mobility Plan for Chandigarh Urban Complex
DRAFT FINAL REPORT – July 2009 Chapter 14 – Economic and Financial Appraisal for Chandigarh Metro
Apart from development of limited commercial property on metro stations and depot it
is possible to raise resources through leasing of parking rights at stations, advertisement
on trains and tickets, advertisements within stations and parking lots, advertisements on
viaducts, columns and other metro structures, co-branding rights to corporates, film
shootings and special events on metro premises. These revenues from advertisement,
limited property development and other sources have been estimated at 50% of the fare
box revenues during operations.
14.6.3.1 The Financial Analysis has been done with the farebox revenues at Rs 12 per passenger
and costs (capital/additional/replacement/O&M) for period from 2010 to 2044. This
analysis shows that the project is not viable if capital cost is also to be funded from
farebox revenue alone. Further financial analysis has been done to work out average
fare per passenger in order to make the project financially viable from farebox revenue
alone. Thus four scenarios of financial analysis are as follows.
1. Full recovery of capital and O&M cost through farebox revenue only at fare of
Rs 12 per passenger
2. Full recovery of capital and O&M cost through farebox revenue only at fare
level which will make the project to break even (0% return)
3. Full recovery of capital and O&M cost through farebox revenue only at fare
level which will make the project to give a FIRR of 13%
4. Full recovery of capital and O&M cost through farebox revenue only at fare
level which will make the project to give a FIRR of 25%
Table 14.5 Financial Analysis of Chandigarh Metro Phase I with Capital Cost and O&M Cost
Average Fare
Sr. FIRR per Passenger
No Scenario (%) (Rs) Remarks
Full recovery of capital and The project
O&M cost through farebox financially
1. revenue only NEGATIVE Rs 12 unviable
2. Full recovery of capital and
O&M cost through farebox
0%
revenue only at fare level which Fares high to be
(break Rs. 35/-
will make the project to break acceptable
even)
even
14.6.3.2 The above financial analysis shows that the project is financially unviable with fare box
revenue alone at average fare of Rs 12 per passenger in order to recover capital and
O&M costs. The average fare per passenger will have to be Rs 35 per passenger in
order to break even for full recovery of capital and O&M costs. The fare is high to be
affordable to people. This will also not interest private BOT operator as the return is
0%. In order to get return of 13%, the fare will have to be Rs 120 per passenger which
is very high. This will also not interest private BOT operator as the return of 13% will
cover only debt repayments. The fourth scenario shows that in order to give return of
25% to the BOT operator, the fare will have to be Rs 280 per passenger which is very
exorbitant.
14.6.3.3 This analysis shows that it seems impossible to involve private sector or go in for PPP
model for funding the entire project i.e. provision of Civil Works, Electrical &
Signaling systems, Rolling Stock and operating the system with fare box as the only
source of revenue. In fact it has also been observed that even if we try to get the project
taken up on PPP basis with assured annuity payments to the private partner, the amount
of annuity payment after providing for atleast 25% returns will be of the order of Rs
3000 crore for atleast 30 years i.e an overall payment of Rs. 90000 crore.
14.6.3.4 Thus the entire capital costs will have to be borne by government. Only O & M of the
system can be given to private operator. Further analysis has been done with only O&
M cost and additional/replacement costs to borne by private operator with fare box
revenues and advertisement/limited property development revenues going to the
operator. This analysis has been done for two scenarios- the first with fare box revenue
alone going to operator and the second – with fare box revenue and
advertisement/limited property development revenues (estimated at 50% of farebox
revenues) going to operator. The results are shown in Table 14.6.
Table 14.6 Financial Analysis of Chandigarh Metro Phase I with O&M and Additional/Replacement
Costs to be borne by Private Operator
14.6.3.5 Rail based systems are heavily capital intensive with long gestation periods. They are
generally not financially viable on the basis of farebox revenue alone. They are
viewed more as investments with a view to increasing the economic benefits to the
society at large rather than yielding high financial rates of return. Very few systems
all over the world are able to cover their operating costs and therefore grants and
subsidies for operations as well as additional investments are the order of the day.
Since costs of operation are more or less fixed in nature, any increase in passenger
volumes would improve the viability of the system. There are other issues peculiar to
this nature of travel. The setting up of such systems generates externalities, which
normally do not get monetised and flow back to the system to sustain its
development. In other words, the economic benefits flowing to the society and other
benefits generated by the setting up of these systems do not get translated to monetary
benefits for the system itself. Very few countries have been able to channelise these
as sources of revenue back to the system. Since the governing objective of setting up
these systems is social the fares are set at levels which are publicly and politically
RITES LTD Page 11 of 14
Comprehensive Mobility Plan for Chandigarh Urban Complex
DRAFT FINAL REPORT – July 2009 Chapter 14 – Economic and Financial Appraisal for Chandigarh Metro
14.6.3.6 It is obvious from the above financial analysis that capital cost of the project will have
to be borne by government. Private operator can be involved only in O & M of the
system.
14.6.4.1 A Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) may be formed with the participation of Chandigarh
Administration and Ministry of Urban Development, Government as joint venture
partners with 50:50 equity. Later State Governments of Punjab and Haryana may also
join this SPV when the metro system is extended to Mohali and Panchkula. This SPV
will own the metro system and will be responsible for implementation of the system.
Capital cost of Rs 8995 may be funded with debt equity ratio of 3:1. This SPV would
arrange for funds through equity to be contributed by all partners.
14.6.4.2 The SPV would have the powers to raise debt funds from any of the national/
international F.I’s, Banks and/or raise long term bonds to meet debt requirements.
Annual debt repayment is assumed to be done for 15 years after moratorium of 4
years of construction period. Scenarios for rate of interest for the debt are assumed as
3% pa (through international agencies) and 10% pa (national financial institutions).
14.6.4.3 As the metro project benefits the city of Chandigarh, it is important that substantial
part of the project cost is funded through local sources. The proposed metro system
passes along Himalaya Marg and Vikas Marg where abutting land for commercial
purposes is lying vacant and is still to be sold. The proposed system will greatly
benefit the businesses which will be developed after some time on these roads.
Therefore it is important that this benefit passes to the metro system. In this context it
is proposed that the vacant that unsold commercial land along Himalaya Marg and
Vikas Marg (about 230 acres) may be handed over to the SPV for revenue generation
through auction. Of this 50% will be available for commercial sale. In the past this
commercial land has been auctioned at the rate of Rs 3 lakh per sq yard. Same auction
price is assumed for this unused land. This is conservative estimate for generating
revenue through auction of unused land. Actual realization may be more. Thus this
unused commercial land may be auctioned in stages every year in 15 years to meet
the annual debt repayment requirement. In case if the finances for equity of
Chandigarh Administration cannot be arranged through budgetary resources, this can
also be met through auction of additional commercial land. The requirement of
commercial land for various scenarios of availability of debt and financing plan are
given in Table 14.7.
Additiona
Annual Total sale l auction Total
Debt Annual of comm. of com. auction of
Debt Payment auction of land Land to com. land
At for 15 comm. land required meet required to
Compl Equity At years after required to to service equity of meet
etion Completion Completion constructio service debt debt CA equity also
ROI (%) (Rs cr) (Rs cr) Cost (Rs cr) n (Rs cr) (acre) (acre) (50%) (acre)
6968.8
3% 8 2322.96 9291.84 583.76 4.02 60.31 8.00 68.30
7488.3
10% 4 2496.11 9984.45 984.52 6.78 101.71 8.60 110.30
14.6.4.4 The above table indicates that in case the equity is provided through budgetary sources
to the SPV, and it is able to obtain loan at 3% pa through international funding, the
loan can be repaid over a period of 15 years through an annual sale of around 4 ha of
commercial land. However if the cost of funds increases to 10 % pa, the land required
to be auctioned will be around 6.78 ha per year. In this case the total land required to
be auctioned will be approx. 102 ha in 15 years. It is seen that in worst case scenario,
the total land requirement is 110 acres (saleable land out of total 220 acres) in 15
years which is available now on Himalaya Marg and Vikas Marg. This even includes
equity requirement of CA. Thus the available unused commercial land on Himalaya
Marg and Vikas Marg can easily meet debt requirements of the project.
14.6.4.5 In order supplement the resource base for generating funds for debt servicing /
repayments, “dedicated levies” on Registration of Motor Vehicles, Sale of Petrol &
Diesel, and Sale of Liquor can also be thought of. The revenue generated through
these measures is estimated as about Rs 100 crores per year as shown in Table 14.8.
The O & M of the metro system may be given to a private operator. The private operator
will also have to meet the additional cost of rolling stock to cater to increase in traffic and
replacement costs in addition to meet O & M Costs for 30 years. As indicated in Table
14.6, only farebox revenue cannot meet private operator’s costs. The operator will also
have to be given the right to generate revenue through advertisement in trains/stations and
limited property development at stations. These revenue streams will cover operator’s
costs and provide adequate return. In financial bids for selection of operator, the selection
criteria can be the annuity amount which the bidder can ask for to meet all the costs with
adequate return or the bidder can give annuity to the SPV. Alternatively, the SPV may
also keep the right to collect revenues through advertisements and ask the bidder to quote
the annuity amount to be paid to the selected operator. In case, the annuity amount has to
be paid to the selected operator, the SPV can meet this amount through the revenue
collected through dedicated levies as mentioned in Table 14.8.
CHAPTER – 15
INSTITUTIONAL STRENGTHENING
15.1.1 The Chandigarh Urban Complex is spread over the three states of the Chandigarh
Administration (U.T. Govt.), Punjab State Govt. and the Haryana Govt. Each of these
Govt. has different depts. & authorities for implementation of different components of the
transportation related proposals. For example with Chandigarh Administration there are:
1. Transport Department / Chandigarh Transport Undertaking
2. Engineering Deptt.
3. Architecture & Town Planning Deptt.
4. Chandigarh Housing Board.
5. Chandigarh Municipal Corporation.
15.1.2 Similar is the situation in the adjoining states of Punjab & Haryana where also there are a
number of similar agencies whose intervention in the development and implementation of
the transportation schemes will be necessary.
15.2.1 Though the Study covers the transportation problems in the CHANDIGARH URBAN
COMPLEX comprising Chadigarh- S.A.S. Nagar (Mohali) -Panchkula, the impact of the
traffic from the neighboring towns has also to be taken into consideration. The extended
study region consists of the towns of Zirakpur, Kharar, Dera-Bassi in Punjab; Alipur-Kot
Behla complex, Kalka-Pinjore Complex in Haryana and Prawanoo & Baddi in Himachal
Pradesh. These towns lie in outer belt and the substantial traffic which emanates from or
bound for these passes through the Chandigarh Urban Complex using NH 21, 21-A and
22. The traffic to and from these areas have been accounted for through the outer cordon
surveys. Planning and development for these townships is being carried out
independently by the respective authorities e.i. GMADA, T & C Plg. Haryana & HUDA
and T & C Plg. H.P & BBNDA. Based on the data made available for the for these
individual towns & complexes by the respective and the survey conducted on the traffic
passing through the outer cordon as determined by traffic counts at cordon points, quite a
few proposals for the Regional Networks have also been proposed in this study. These
proposals need to be considered very seriously for implementation by the respective State
govts., NHAI and railways in the long term perspective.
15.2.2 Since these Regional Proposals as listed in Chapter 12 (Table 12.3 & Table 12.9)
transcend the state boundaries as well as fall within the jurisdiction various Central &
State Govt. departments, for their future planning, development and execution an inter
state agency is necessary. Also, since even the proposal/projects identified for the
Chandigarh Urban Complex are spread over the 3 adjoining states, their respective
implementing agencies will have to work in close coordination with each other. In fact
observing such problems, while formulating the National Transport policy it was
observed that:
‘The current structure of governance for the transport sector is not equipped to
deal with the problems of urban transport. These structures were put in place well before
the problems of urban transport began to surface in India and hence do not provide for
the right coordination mechanisms to deal with urban transport. The central government
will, therefore, recommend the setting up of Unified Metropolitan Transport Authorities
(UMTA’s) in all million cities to facilitate more co-ordinated planning and
implementation of urban transport programmes & projects and integrated management
of urban transport systems. Such Metropolitan Transport Authorities would need
statutory backing in order to be meaningful’.
15.2.3 The study region which had a population of 1.36 million in 2001 & estimated to have
exceeded 2 million in 2009 and is slated to grow upto around 6 million by 2041 (ref.
Table 8.2). Thus an agency in the form of a Regional & Urban Transport Development
Board (RUTDB) on the lines of the UMTA / NCR Planning Board under Govt. of India
with all the respective state Govts. and concerned central govt. agencies like Railways
and NHAI as its members. This Board could coordinate the planning and implementation
of the all the Transport proposals within the Region as well as the Urban Complex and
resolve any inter-state transport problems. While for actual implementation of the
projects, the concerned agencies / SPV’s as may be set up, will be responsible, the Board
will assign and assist in development of the Transport Projects and coordinate with
national / international funding agencies for these projects.
The Board could be headed by the Administrator Chandigarh and have the following
members:
• Chief Secretaries of the States of Punjab, Haryana and Himachal Pradesh,
• Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development, Govt. of India
• Chairman NHAI
• General Manager Northern Railways
• Advisor to Administrator Chandigarh Administration.
• C.E.O. of the Board.
15.3.1 The institutional arrangements for any project flow out of the basic decisions with regard
to its implementation, operation and management needs. The most prudent arrangement
for implementing the proposed mass transport projects for the Chandigarh, Urban
Complex is suggested as under:
• That a Metro covering a route length of 40.7 km. within Chandigarh (along 3
corridors) extendable to SAS Nagar in Punjab and Panchkula in Haryana be taken up
in the first Phase to be implemented by 2014.
• CUMTC will be a Joint Venture company with 50:50 equity participation from
Chandigarh Administration and MOUD, GOI. Later on when the system extends in
Mohali and Panchkula. the State Govt. of Punjab and Haryana may also join this SPV
by equity participation.
• CUMTC would arrange for funds through equity to be contributed by all partners.
• CUMTC would have the powers to raise debt funds from any of the national /
international F.I.’s, Banks and / or raise long term bonds.
• Since the funds are proposed to be retained through property development, i.e. sale of
Commercial plots in Chandigarh, the property/ plots earmarked for this purpose may
be transferred to the CUMTC by the Chandigarh Administration.
• The complete Metro network along with the system and Rolling stock will be handed
over by CUMTC to the “Operator Company” initially for a concession period of 30
years. After the completion of the concession period of operation, the Operator
Company will hand over the complete System in “Good Running Condition” to
CUMTC. Thereafter either the same company can be allowed to continue on the basis
of a fresh Contract or a new company can be invited to bid and enter in to a contract
on the basis of the bid.
• The revenue stream shall consist of user charges from passengers and from
advertisements and will be collected by the Operator Company.
• This revenue stream should generally meet the O & M and replacement cost and
CUMTC can provide viability gap funding on Annuity basis if there is a shortfall
or draw back any excess amount which may form part of the financial bid of the
Operator Company.
15.3.3 Since the project is actually going to be implemented by this SPV this authority should
work on the pattern of the DMRC. The composition of the corporation and the act under
which it will function will be decided the Governments/RUTDB.
Broadly speaking its activities can be divided into four phases of the project. These are:
• Preparation of the DPR for the project and obtaining all the necessary technical
clearances including Environmental Clearance.
• Arranging finances for the project- Equity from the stake holders and debts from
F.I’s / raising bonds.
• Identification of any land as may be required for the project, getting it transferred
through the Chandigarh Administration.
• Completing the Bidding processes and award of contract with the approval of the
Board.
• Immediately after the award of contract, the contractor will submit the detailed
designs for the project, its execution Schedule and all other necessary documents
for examination and approval of the CUMTC.
• Transfer of right of way, space for depots and major stations etc. to the Contractor
• Monitoring the construction activities and their adherence to approved designs
and the time schedule approved in the DPR.
• Getting the systems, rolling stock and allied equipment duly checked and certified
by the consultants
• All pre-operation testing and certification of the entire system to conform to the
safety norms and technical specifications.
• Making arrangements for annuity payments through returns from property
development and other revenue sources
• Getting the statute analogous to Delhi Metro Railway (Operation & Maintenance)
Act , 2002 enacted well before the operation starts
• At least Six month before the anticipated date of completion of the project
completion / execution, CUMTC will finalize the Pre-Qualification terms as well
as the bid terms for inviting prospective bidders to apply for the operation &
Management of the MRTS. The Operator Company must be placed in position
well before the commissioning of the system.
• Once the system is commissioned after due certification its operations and
formally taken over by CUMTC, it will be handed over to the Operator Company.
• During the operation by the Operator Company the CUMTC will oversee :
During this period CUMTC will also undertake the commercial development sale the
properties allocated to it by the Administration
The CUMTC will be responsible for all repayments Debts /Bonds for which it may use
the above fund & if necessary seek additional funds from Chandigarh Administration,
who may provide the same either through dedicated levis or/and budgetary source as and
when necessary.
ADJOINING
NAME NODE SECTION ROAD EXISTING
NODE WIDTH (m) LIGHTING LAND USE
OF THE NUMBER LENGTH SURFACE TSM
ROAD (km) MEASURES
SERVICE ROAD FOOT PATH LOCA-
FROM TO FROM TO ROW CW MEDIAN TYPE TYPE QUALITY LEFT RIGHT
LEFT RIGHT LEFT RIGHT TION
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
REMARKS COLUMN SHOULD BE FILLED FOR ANY ABNORMALITY OBSERVED IN TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS LIKE TEMPORARY DIVERSIONS / ACCIDENTS / TRAFFIC JAM OR CHANGE IN
WEATHER LIKE RAIN / STORM, ETC.
Annexure 4.1
Motorised vehicle
Passenger Vehicle Goods Vehicle Agricultural Vehicle
Time Period
Car/Jeep/Va Scooter/ Others Cycle Others
Auto Minibus Bus LCV 2-3 Axle MAV Tractor Tractor Trailer Cycle Remarks
n Motorcycle Rickshaw
Annexure 4.1
TIME OF TYPE OF ORIGIN DESTINATION TRIP COMMODITY TONNAGE FREQUENCY STOPPAGE IN THE CITY REMARKS
SURVEY VEHICLE LENGTH TIME LOCATION TIME PURPOSE
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
OCCUPA-
TIME OF TYPE OF ORIGIN DESTINA-TION TRIP PURP- FREQ-
NCY OF THE REMARKS
SURVEY VEHICLE (Specify Location) (Specify Location) OSE UENCY
VEHICLE
LENGTH TIME
1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
1223
1192
354
153
Jan Marg 373 686 Jan Marg
60
672
612 78
1361
1664
Madhya Marg
Housing Board Chowk
Sector - 12
EVENING PEAK Madhya Marg
1845-1945
Vehicles 4651
PCU 4202
1386
1097
342
123
Jan Marg 284 632 Jan Marg
108
794
538 95
1427
1213
Madhya Marg
Housing Board Chowk
A n n e x u r e 4 . 1 0
1120
1775
379
352
Jan Marg 197 1044 Jan Marg
337
746
897 536
2178
2317
Udyog Path
Sector - 28
Sector - 14
EVENING PEAK Udyog Path
1730 - 1830
Vehicles 7930
PCU 6833
1680
. 1855
376
410
Jan Marg 174 1069 Jan Marg
369
940
565 314
1819
2128
Udyog Path
Sector - 28
A n n e x u r e 4 . 1 0
1635
1618
193
330
Jan Marg 201 1095 Jan Marg
422
1135
250 411
1795
1931
3726
Dakshin Marg
Zirak Pur
Sector - 38
EVENING PEAK Dakshin Marg
1745 - 1845
Vehicles 9693
PCU 7830
2278
. 1885
365
207
Jan Marg 208 1313 Jan Marg
526
1641
402 503
2546
2095
Dakshin Marg
Zirak Pur
A n n e x u r e 4 . 1 0
1165
1158
168
291
Himalaya Marg 150 700 Himalaya Marg
792
669
165 713
1546
1579
Mohali
Phase - XI
Phase - V
EVENING PEAK Mohali
1800 - 1900
Vehicles 9033
PCU 7120
1620
. 1503
252
390
Himalaya Marg 330 861 Himalaya Marg
1100
835
119 870
1823
2234
Mohali
Phase - XI
A n n e x u r e 4 . 1 0
1657
1947
83
521
Himalaya Marg 196 1343 Himalaya Marg
271
959
618 256
1833
2205
Vikas Marg
Ram Darbar Colony
Sector - 39
EVENING PEAK Vikas Marg
1730 - 1830
Vehicles 9812
PCU 7547
1806
. 1814
159
558
Himalaya Marg 88 1098 Himalaya Marg
324
1025
593 295
1913
1851
Vikas Marg
Ram Darbar Colony
A n n e x u r e 4 . 1 0
1741
1733
390
692
Himalaya Marg 248 651 Himalaya Marg
666
1041
366 550
1957
1923
Dakshin Marg
Zirak Pur
Sector - 38
EVENING PEAK Dakshin Marg
1745 - 1845
Vehicles 9921
PCU 8035
1859
. 2092
531
550
Himalaya Marg 270 1011 Himalaya Marg
714
1031
677 544
2252
2415
Dakshin Marg
Zirak Pur
A n n e x u r e 4 . 1 0
1792
1564
483
481
Himalaya Marg 797 600 Himalaya Marg
302
732
346 339
1416
1214
0
Sector - 21
Sector - 22
EVENING PEAK 0
1745 - 1845
Vehicles 9462
PCU 8017
1946
. 1717
656
338
Himalaya Marg 635 723 Himalaya Marg
334
904
614 272
1790
1534
0
Sector - 21
A n n e x u r e 4 . 1 0
1466
2057
850
398
Himalaya Marg 457 809 Himalaya Marg
328
604
378 475
1457
1367
Udyog Path
Sector - 28
Sector - 14
EVENING PEAK Udyog Path
1730 - 1830
Vehicles 11725
PCU 9540
2329
. 3047
723
1113
Himalaya Marg 602 1211 . Himalaya Marg
870
1070
379 573
2022
2472
Udyog Path
Sector - 28
A n n e x u r e 4 . 1 0
4072
2405
387
300
Himalaya Marg 692 1719 Himalaya Marg
660
2640
161 624
3424
2533
Madhya Marg
Housing Board
Sector-12
EVENING PEAK Madhya Marg
1800 - 1900
Vehicles 10075
PCU 8474
2484
. 3343
690
430
Himalaya Marg 481 2223 Himalaya Marg
696
1800
228 515
2543
3226
Madhya Marg
Housing Board
A n n e x u r e 4 . 1 0
3065
1756
321
118
Sukhna Path 631 1318 Sukhna Path
112
2198
423 198
2818
1968
Madhya Marg
Housing Board
Sector-12
EVENING PEAK Madhya Marg
1745 - 1845
Vehicles 8264
PCU 6824
1705
. 2800
571
251
Sukhna Path 354 1978 Sukhna Path
200
1118
623 142
1882
2766
Madhya Marg
Housing Board
A n n e x u r e 4 . 1 0
2023
1016
200
259
Sukhna Path 581 558 Sukhna Path
161
1090
245 264
1599
1009
Udyog Path
Sector -28
Sector -14
EVENING PEAK Udyog Path
1730 - 1830
Vehicles 6439
PCU 5525
1301
. 1948
692
338
Sukhna Path 263 918 Sukhna Path
255
725
132 119
975
1434
Udyog Path
Sector -28
A n n e x u r e 4 . 1 0
2864
2656
323
527
Sukhna Path 424 1806 Sukhna Path
281
1699
242 265
2205
2427
Dakshin Marg
Zirakpur
Sector -38
EVENING PEAK Dakshin Marg
1730 - 1830
Vehicles 11645
PCU 9929
3091
. 2939
649
555
Sukhna Path 507 1735 Sukhna Path
536
1679
482 519
2679
2635
Dakshin Marg
Zirakpur
A n n e x u r e 4 . 1 0
1345
1795
271
778
Chandi Path 105 746 Chandi Path
37
714
183 95
992
1019
Vikas Marg
Sector -47,48
Sector -39
EVENING PEAK Vikas Marg
1800 - 1900
Vehicles 5166
PCU 4649
1642
. 1322
305
362
Chandi Path 132 655 Chandi Path
14
879
141 121
1140
866
Vikas Marg
Sector -47,48
A n n e x u r e 4 . 1 0
2012
2006
408
335
Sukhna Path 463 1263 Sukhna Path
287
1157
131 372
1659
1716
Vikas Marg
Sector -47,48
Sector -39
EVENING PEAK Vikas Marg
1800 - 1900
Vehicles 8563
PCU 7484
2291
. 2717
709
375
Sukhna Path 520 1634 Sukhna Path
250
1440
244 408
2092
2039
Vikas Marg
Sector -47,48
A n n e x u r e 4 . 1 0
579
559
45
215
Poorvi Marg 244 299 Poorvi Marg
68
174
109 74
356
587
Shanti Path
Ram Darbar Colony
Sector -38
EVENING PEAK Shanti Path
1730 - 1830
Vehicles 4912
PCU 4455
674
. 542
37
91
Poorvi Marg 53 415 Poorvi Marg
155
410
198 88
696
751
Shanti Path
Ram Darbar Colony
A n n e x u r e 4 . 1 0
3231
2642
529
716
Poorvi Marg 739 1398 Poorvi Marg
551
1770
705 703
3177
2667
Dakshin Marg
Zirakpur
Sector -38
EVENING PEAK Dakshin Marg
1730 - 1830
Vehicles 13251
PCU 12361
2582
. 3218
810
612
Poorvi Marg 493 1797 Poorvi Marg
644
1389
770 951
3110
3900
Dakshin Marg
Zirakpur
A n n e x u r e 4 . 1 0
3559
3092
471
689
Poorvi Marg 307 1932 Poorvi Marg
216
2798
1785 411
4993
3562
Madhya Marg
Housing Board
Sector -12
EVENING PEAK Madhya Marg
1830 - 1930
Vehicles 14111
PCU 14769
3616
. 4691
1170
652
Poorvi Marg 869 2870 Poorvi Marg
388
2264
1856 331
4451
5108
Madhya Marg
Housing Board
A n n e x u r e 4 . 1 0
5086
3788
250
188
233 3350 0
163
4552
946 652
6150
4078
Madhya Marg
Housing Board
Sector -12
EVENING PEAK Madhya Marg
1830 - 1930
Vehicles 12543
PCU 11600
4111
. 4673
253 312
0 345 4362 0
474
3429
466 241
4135
5632
Madhya Marg
Housing Board
A n n e x u r e 4 . 1 0
4838
2778
1895
77
2633 806 0
229
2048
386 223
2656
1542
Madhya Marg
Pinjor
Chandigarh
EVENING PEAK Madhya Marg
1745 - 1845
Vehicles 14516
PCU 12680
4230
. 4700
3618
91
0 1538 992 0
449
2415
633 393
3441
1921
Madhya Marg
Pinjor
A n n e x u r e 4 . 1 0
1426
1155
213
241
361 701 0
182
856
332 559
1747
1194
0
Sector -04
Sector -07
EVENING PEAK 0
1745 - 1845
Vehicles 5492
PCU 4594
1065
. 1404
233
195
0 203 976 0
355
659
328 302
1288
1736
0
Sector -04
Annexure 4.11
PEDESTRIAN SURVEYS
0800-0815
0815-0830
0830-0845
0845-0900
1900-1915
1915-1930
1930-1945
1945-2000
Annexure 4.2
Motorised vehicle
Passenger Vehicle Goods Vehicle Agricultural Vehicle
Time Period
Car/Jeep/Va Scooter/ Others Cycle Others
Auto Minibus Bus LCV 2-3 Axle MAV Tractor Tractor Trailer Cycle Remarks
n Motorcycle Rickshaw
Annexure 4.3
Motorised vehicle
Passenger Vehicle Goods Vehicle Agricultural Vehicle
Time Period Remarks
Car/Jeep/Va Scooter/ Others Cycle Others
Auto Minibus Bus LCV 2-3 Axle MAV Tractor Tractor Trailer Cycle
n Motorcycle Rickshaw
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 16 17 18
Comprehensive Mobility Plan for Chandigarh Urban Complex Annexure 4.4
DRAFT FINAL REPORT – July 2009 Chapter 4 – Traffic Characteristics
Composition of Total Traffic at 01_NH-21 (Dera Bassi Toll Plaza) Composition of Total Traffic at 02_NH-64 PATIAYALA RD. (Near Banoor Chowk)
M_Bus Truck
5% LCV Tractor-trailer LCV MAV Tractor-trailer
1% Tractor
Bus Truck 2% Cycle
5% 1% 10% 1% 1%
5% 9% 3%
Cycle M_Bus
4% 1%
Bus Other (S)
Tempo 1%
5%
2%
Rick
1% Rick
1%
Tempo
4%
2-Wh Car/Jeep/Van
30% 32%
Car/Jeep/Van
46%
2-Wh
30%
Composition of Total Traffic at 03_Sarhind Road Composition of Total Traffic at 04_NH-21 (Outside Kharar)
Bus
Truck LCV
Tempo 1% Tractor-trailer Cycle
3% 3% LCV MAV
3% 1% 7%
2-Wh 7% 1%
Truck
32% MAV
6%
1%
Bus
Rick
5%
1%
Tractor-trailer
1%
Tempo
3%
Tractor
1%
Cycle Car/Jeep/Van
6% 43%
2-Wh
26%
Car/Jeep/Van Other (S)
48% 1%
Composition of Total Traffic at 05_KHUDA LOHARA MULLAN PUR ROAD Composition of Total Traffic at 06_NH-21 (Outside Baddi)
Tractor Tractor-trailer
MAV
1% 3%
LCV 1%
LCV Tractor-trailer Cycle Cycle
13%
3% 1% 13% 2%
Truck
2% Truck
Other (S) 16% Other (S)
1% 1%
Bus
School Bus
1%
1% Car/Jeep/Van
Car/Jeep/Van
29%
31%
M_Bus
Tempo 2%
5%
Bus
2-Wh 4%
43% Tempo 2-Wh
1% 26%
Bus
Bus
2%
2%
Car/Jeep/Van
34%
2-Wh Car/Jeep/Van
32% 43%
2-Wh
41%
Composition of Total Traffic at 09_NH-73 Composition of Total Traffic at 02_NH-21 (Near Silver City)
M_Bus
1% 2-Wh
31%
Other (S)
2%
Car/Jeep/Van
Bus 29%
3%
Car/Jeep/Van
Tempo 2-Wh
44%
2% 21%
Composition of Total Traffic at 01_NH-22 (SURAJ PUR) Composition of Total Traffic at 03_NH-21 (BOLANGI PUR)
Bus
4%
Bus Car/Jeep/Van
3% 36%
Tempo
9%
Tempo
4%
2-Wh 2-Wh
22% 35%
LCV Tractor
MAV
Truck 1%
13% 4%
15% Tractor-trailer
1%
M_Bus
1%
Cycle
3%
Bus
2%
Car/Jeep/Van
32%
Tempo
1%
2-Wh
27%
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
1000
1200
1400
1600
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
100
200
300
400
500
600
500
200
400
600
800
200
400
600
800
0
0
0
0800-0900 0800-0900
0800-0900 0800-0900
0900-1000 0900-1000
0915-1015 0915-1015
1000-1100 1000-1100
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
1900-2000 1900-2000
1915-2015 1915-2015
2000-2100 2000-2100
2030-2130 2030-2130
2100-2200
PCU's
PCU's
2100-2200
PCU's
PCU's
2145-2245 2145-2245 2200-2300 2200-2300
2300-2400 2300-2400 2300-2400 2300-2400
2400-0100 2400-0100
0015-0115 0015-0115
0100-0200 0100-0200
0130-0230 0130-0230
0200-0300 0200-0300
0245-0345 0245-0345 0300-0400 0300-0400
0400-0500 0400-0500 0400-0500 0400-0500
0500-0600 0500-0600
0515-0615 0515-0615
0600-0700 0600-0700
0630-0730 0630-0730
0700-0800 0700-0800
1000
1500
2000
2500
100
120
140
1000
1500
2000
2500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
500
20
40
60
80
500
500
0
0
0
0
0800-0900
0800-0900 0800-0900 0800-0900
0900-1000
1400-1500
1415-1515 1415-1515 1415-1515
1500-1600
1530-1630 1530-1630 1530-1630
1600-1700
1700-1800 1645-1745 1645-1745 1645-1745
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
1900-2000
1915-2015 1915-2015 1915-2015
2000-2100
2030-2130 2030-2130 2030-2130
2100-2200
PCU's
PCU's
PCU's
PCU's
Annexure 4.5
0130-0230 0130-0230 0130-0230
0200-0300
0300-0400 0245-0345 0245-0345 0245-0345
0700-0800
RITES LTD
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
1000
1200
1400
1600
500
500
200
400
600
800
0
0
0
0800-0900 0800-0900 0800-0900
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
1915-2015 1915-2015 1915-2015
PCU's
PCU's
PCU's
2145-2245 2145-2245 2145-2245
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
500
500
0
0
0800-0900 0800-0900
0915-1015 0915-1015
1145-1245 1145-1245
1415-1515 1415-1515
1530-1630 1530-1630
1645-1745 1645-1745
1800-1900 1800-1900
Nos.
Nos.
1915-2015 1915-2015
2030-2130 2030-2130
2300-2400 2300-2400
0015-0115 0015-0115
Annexure 4.5
0130-0230
0130-0230
0245-0345
0245-0345
0400-0500
0400-0500
0515-0615
0515-0615
Page 2 of 2
0630-0730
0630-0730
Comprehensive Mobility Plan for Chandigarh Urban Complex Annexure 4.6
DRAFT FINAL REPORT – July 2009 Chapter 4 – Traffic Characteristics
Composition of Total Traffic at 01_Vidya Path between Sec-14&15 Composition of Total Traffic at 02_Sarover Path between Sec-18&19
Cycle
Rick
13% Rick
LCV 4% LCV Cycle
1% 5%
2% 12%
Car/Jeep/Van
26%
Bus
Car/Jeep/Van 1%
Tempo
32%
7%
Tempo
8%
2-Wh
2-Wh 46%
43%
Composition of Total Traffic at 03_Sec-27&28 Composition of Total Traffic at 04_Vidyapath between Sec-37&38
2-Wh
2-Wh
43%
45%
Composition of Total Traffic at 05_Udyan Path between sec-36&37 at Mid Block Composition of Total Traffic at 06_SEC-33,34
Tempo
2%
Tempo
7%
2-Wh
2-Wh
49%
46%
Composition of Total Traffic at 07_Sec -32,33 Composition of Total Traffic at 08_SEC -31,32
Car/Jeep/Van
2-Wh 36%
46%
2-Wh
49%
Composition of Total Traffic at 09_Sec-51,52 Composition of Total Traffic at 10_Himalya Path Sec -77 & 78 Mohali
Car/Jeep/Van
2-Wh 48%
2-Wh Car/Jeep/Van
39%
39% 49%
Composition of Total Traffic at 11_Sec-10 and Sec-15 (Panchkula) Composition of Total Traffic at 12_Sec-5 & Sec-6 (Nr. General Hospital)
Cycle
LCV Bus LCV Cycle
12% Rick
Bus 1% 1% 2% 12%
1% Tempo
1%
3% Rick
Tempo 2%
Other (S)
3%
1%
2-Wh
32%
Car/Jeep
38%
2-Wh
43%
Car/Jeep
48%
Composition of Total Traffic at 13_Between Sec 11 & 15 Composition of Total Traffic at 14_Sec-1 Shimla Road (Panchkula)
LCV
Cycle MAV
Bus 1% LCV
11% Rick Truck 3% Cycle
1% 10%
3% 12% 9%
Other (S)
Tempo Rick
1%
8% 2%
Bus
2%
Car/Jeep/Van
24%
Tempo
7% Car/Jeep
29%
2-Wh
51% 2-Wh
26%
Tempo
3%
Car/Jeep/Van
40%
2-Wh
40%
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
500
500
RITES LTD
0
6.00-7.00 6.00-7.00 6.00-7.00 6.00-7.00
6.45-7.45
Hourly variation of Traffic at 01_Vidya Path betw een Sec-14&15 MID BLOCK
6.45-7.45 6.45-7.45 6.45-7.45
Nos.
12:45-13:45
Nos.
12:45-13:45
Nos.
Nos.
12:45-13:45 12:45-13:45
PCU's
PCU's
PCU's
PCU's
15:00-16:00 15:00-16:00 15:00-16:00 15:00-16:00
16:30-17:30 16:30-17:30
16:30-17:30 16:30-17:30
17:15-18:15 17:15-18:15
17:15-18:15 17:15-18:15
18:00-19:00 18:00-19:00
18:00-19:00 18:00-19:00
18:45-19:45 18:45-19:45
18:45-19:45 18:45-19:45
19:30-20:30
19:30-20:30 19:30-20:30 19:30-20:30
20:15-21:15
20:15-21:15 20:15-21:15 20:15-21:15
21:00-22:00
21:00-22:00 21:00-22:00 21:00-22:00
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
500
0
0
0
0
6.00-7.00
6.00-7.00 6.00-7.00 6.00-7.00
9.00-10.00
Nos.
12:45-13:45
12:45-13:45
Nos.
12:45-13:45 12:45-13:45
Nos.
13:30-14:30
13:30-14:30
13:30-14:30 13:30-14:30
14:15-15:15
14:15-15:15
PCU's
PCU's
14:15-15:15
14:15-15:15 PCU's 15:00-16:00
15:00-16:00
PCU's
15:00-16:00
15:00-16:00 15:45-16:45
Annexure 4.7
15:45-16:45
15:45-16:45
15:45-16:45 16:30-17:30
16:30-17:30
16:30-17:30
16:30-17:30 17:15-18:15
17:15-18:15
17:15-18:15 18:00-19:00
18:00-19:00 17:15-18:15
Page 1 of 2
18:00-19:00 18:45-19:45
18:45-19:45 18:00-19:00
18:45-19:45 19:30-20:30
19:30-20:30 18:45-19:45
19:30-20:30 20:15-21:15
20:15-21:15 19:30-20:30
20:15-21:15 21:00-22:00
21:00-22:00 20:15-21:15
21:00-22:00
21:00-22:00
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
0
RITES LTD
0
6.00-7.00 6.00-7.00 6.00-7.00 6.00-7.00
Hourly variation of Traffic at 15_NH-21 DAKSHIN MARG CHECK POST Mid Block
6.45-7.45 6.45-7.45 6.45-7.45 6.45-7.45
Nos.
12:45-13:45
Nos.
Nos.
Nos.
12:45-13:45 12:45-13:45 12:45-13:45
PCU's
PCU's
PCU's
PCU's
15:00-16:00 15:00-16:00
15:00-16:00 15:00-16:00
15:45-16:45 15:45-16:45
15:45-16:45 15:45-16:45
16:30-17:30
16:30-17:30 16:30-17:30 16:30-17:30
17:15-18:15
17:15-18:15 17:15-18:15 17:15-18:15
18:00-19:00
18:00-19:00 18:00-19:00 18:00-19:00
18:45-19:45
18:45-19:45 18:45-19:45 18:45-19:45
19:30-20:30
19:30-20:30 19:30-20:30 19:30-20:30
20:15-21:15
20:15-21:15 20:15-21:15 20:15-21:15
21:00-22:00
21:00-22:00 21:00-22:00 21:00-22:00
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
500
500
0
0
0
Hourly variation of Traffic at 12_Sec-5 & Sec-6 (Nr. Gernel Hospital) M id Block
6.45-7.45 6.45-7.45 6.45-7.45
Nos.
12:45-13:45
12:45-13:45
Nos.
12:45-13:45
13:30-14:30 13:30-14:30
13:30-14:30
14:15-15:15 14:15-15:15
PCU's
14:15-15:15
PCU's
PCU's
15:00-16:00 15:00-16:00
15:00-16:00
15:45-16:45
Annexure 4.7
15:45-16:45
15:45-16:45
16:30-17:30 16:30-17:30
16:30-17:30
17:15-18:15 17:15-18:15
17:15-18:15
18:00-19:00 18:00-19:00
Page 2 of 2
18:00-19:00
18:45-19:45
18:45-19:45
18:45-19:45
19:30-20:30
19:30-20:30
19:30-20:30
20:15-21:15
20:15-21:15
21:00-22:00 20:15-21:15
21:00-22:00
21:00-22:00
Comprehensive Mobility Plan for Chandigarh Urban Complex Annexure 4.8
DRAFT FINAL REPORT – July 2009 Chapter 4 – Traffic Characteristics
0 1_ N E A R C H A N D IG A R H H O US IN G B O A R D 0 2 _ C R IC KE T S T A D IUM
Tr a c t or
LCV Ot he rs (F) Tr uc k LCV
Truc k 0.1% Ot he r s ( F)
0.6% 0.1% Cyc le S c hool Bus 0.1% 0.8%
S c hool Bus 0.1% 11.9% Ric ksha w Mini Bus 0.2%
0.1%
Cyc le Ric ksha w
0.1% 4.0% 0.3%
Ot he r s (S ) 13.7% 5.5%
Mini Bus Ot he r s ( S )
0.5% Bus
0.3% 0.2%
2.2%
Bus
1.5% Te mpo
9.1% Ca r , J e e p & Va n
Te mpo Aut o Aut o 27.4%
8.2% 0.1% 0.1%
Ca r , J e e p & Va n
43.6%
2- Whe e le r
28.9% 2- Whe e le r
40.2%
0 3 _ R O T A R Y O F KIS A N B H A WA N 0 4 _ P H A S E - 7 C H O WK ( M O H A LI)
Truc k LCV MAV Ot he r s ( F)
Tr uc k LCV Cyc le
S c hool Bus S c hool Bus 0.4% 1.0% 0.1% 0.1% Tr a c t or
0.1% 1.2% 10.4% Ric ksha w
0.2% Mini Bus 0.3% 0.1%
4.4% Cyc le
Bus 0.3%
Mini Bus 12.6%
Ot he rs ( S ) 0.6%
0.1%
0.2% Ric ksha w
Bus Te mpo
1.6%
1.4% 7.4%
Ot he rs ( S )
Aut o
0.4%
0.1%
Te mpo Ca r, J e e p & Va n
7.8% Aut o
34.3%
0.2%
2- Whe e le r Ca r , J e e p & Va n
2- Whe e le r 39.3% 35.6%
39.5%
0 5 _S E C - 4 3 C H A N D IG A R H I.S.B .T . 0 6 _ B H A KR A C O LO N Y C H O WK
School Bus S c hool Bus
Mini Bus LCV Cycle LCV Cyc le Ric ksha w
0.1% Ricks haw Mini Bus 0.1%
0.1% 0.5% 14.1% 22.2%
Bus
5.0% 0.4% 4.6%
0.2%
0.5% Other s (S) Bus
Tempo Ot he rs (S )
4.2% 0.3% 2.0%
0.6%
Te mpo
Auto 7.5%
0.2%
Aut o
0.2%
0 7 _ A R O M A H O T E L C H O WK 0 8 _ S E C T O R - 17 IS B T ( C H A N D IG A R H )
Mini Bus S c hool Bus
LCV Mini Bus S c hool Bus Truc k
Bus 0.1% 0.2% LCV
0.4% Cyc le 0.1% 0.1% Cyc le
Bus 0.2% 0.4%
1.8% 14.4% Ric ksha w 13.1%
Te mpo 1.9%
8.0% 7.8%
Te mpo Ric ksha w
Aut o Ot he r s ( S ) 10.0% 4.5%
0.2% 0.9%
Aut o Ot he r s ( S )
0.2% 0.6%
Ca r, J e e p & Va n
Ca r , J e e p & Va n 28.3%
2- Whe e le r 25.8% 2- Whe e le r
40.3% 40.5%
0 9 _ K. C . C IN E M A C H O WK 10 _ R O T A R Y O F M A D H Y A M A R G
School Bus Tr uck
Mini Bus
Mini Bus S c hool Bus Tr uc k
0.3% 0.1% LCV Cycle
LCV
Ot he r s ( F) 0.2% 1.1% 14.2% Ricks haw
0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 1.0%
Bus
Bus Cyc le 3.8%
0.3% 1.1%
Te mpo 0.6% 18.7%
Tempo
7.1% Other s (S)
Ric ksha w 10.7%
0.9%
Aut o 3.5% Auto
0.2%
0.1%
Ot he r s ( S )
0.9%
13 _ S IR H IN D C H O WK N E A R S E C T O R - 5 1 14 _ S UKH N A P A T H N E A R S E C T O R - 4 9 ,5 0
Tr uc k LCV MAV Ot he r s ( F)
S c hool Bus
Mini Bus 1.3%2.2% 0.1% 0.1%
S c hool Bus Truc k LCV MAV 0.2%
2.5% Bus 0.1% Cyc le
0.4% 2.1% 0.1% Ot he rs (F)
Mini Bus 14.3%
0.3% Cyc le 1.7%
0.2% Te mpo Ric ksha w
Bus 12.9%
Ric ksha w 4.5% 2.3%
2.1%
Te mpo 2.8%
Aut o Ot he r s ( S )
3.3% 0.1% 1.5%
Ot he r s ( S )
Aut o 1.5%
0.1%
2- Whe e le r
2- Whe e le r Ca r , J e e p & Va n
Ca r, J e e p & Va n 39.1%
34.6% 32.3%
36.7%
15 _ R O T A R Y N E A R S E C T O R - 4 7 ( P O O R V I 16 _ D A KS H IN M A R G ( T R IB UN E C H O WK)
M A R G)
Truc k
Mini Bus S c hool Bus Tr uc k LCV
0.2% 2.0% LCV Mini Bus S c hool Bus MAV
Bus 0.3% 2.6% 6.8%
0.3% 0.2%
1.2% 3.3% Ot he rs (F) Bus 0.2% Cyc le
0.7% Cyc le 12.2%
2.0%
Te mpo 16.4% Te mpo Ric ksha w
Ric ksha w
2.3% 3.6% 3.0%
Aut o 3.6%
0.2% Aut o
0.2% Ot he r s (S )
0.8%
Ot he r s (S )
1.4%
2- Whe e le r
Ca r , J e e p & Va n 2- Whe e le r Ca r, J e e p & Va n
40.9%
26.7% 36.4% 31.1%
17 _ M A D H Y A M A R G N E A R T IM B E R M A R KE T 18 _ C H A N D IG A R H R A ILWA Y S T A T IO N
Aut o
0.2%
2- Whe e le r Ca r , J e e p & Va n
Ca r, J e e p & Va n
2- Whe e le r 34.99% 34.68%
32.0%
29.6%
19 _ H O US IN G B O A R D 2 0 _ S E C T O R - 4 IS B T ( P A N C H KULA )
2- Whe e le r
34.1%
Ca r , J e e p & Va n Ca r, J e e p & Va n
42.4% 37.2%
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
1000
1200
1400
1600
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
500
500
200
400
600
800
500
0
0
0
0600 - 0615 0600 - 0615 0600 - 0615 0600 - 0615
TIM E (HOURS)
TIME (HOURS)
TIME (HOURS)
1245 - 1300
1245 - 1300 1245 - 1300 1245 - 1300
1330 - 1345
1330 - 1345 1330 - 1345 1330 - 1345
1415 - 1430
1415 - 1430 1415 - 1430 1415 - 1430
1500 - 1515
1500 - 1515 1500 - 1515 1500 - 1515
1545 - 1600
1545 - 1600 1545 - 1600 1545 - 1600
1630 - 1645
1630 - 1645 1630 - 1645 1630 - 1645
1715 - 1730
1715 - 1730 1715 - 1730 1715 - 1730
1800 - 1815
1800 - 1815 1800 - 1815 1800 - 1815
1845 - 1900
1845 - 1900 1845 - 1900 1845 - 1900
1930 - 1945
1930 - 1945 1930 - 1945 1930 - 1945
2015 - 2030
2015 - 2030 2015 - 2030 2015 - 2030
2100 - 2115
2100 - 2115 2100 - 2115 2100 - 2115
2145 - 2200
2145 - 2200 2145 - 2200 2145 - 2200
PCUs
Vehicles
PCUs
Vehicles
PCUs
Vehicles
PCUs
Vehicles
NUMBER OF VECHILES
NUMBER OF VECHILES NUMBER OF VEHICLES NUMBER OF VEHICLES
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
1000
1500
2000
2500
1000
1500
2000
2500
500
500
500
0
0
0600 - 0615
0600 - 0615 0600 - 0615 0600 - 0615
0645 - 0700
0645 - 0700 0645 - 0700 0645 - 0700
0730 - 0745
0730 - 0745 0730 - 0745 0730 - 0745
0815 - 0830
0815 - 0830 0815 - 0830 0815 - 0830
0900 - 0915
08_SEC-17 I.S.B.T. CHANDIGARH
02_CRICKET STADIUM
1200 - 1215 1115 - 1130 1115 - 1130
1115 - 1130
TIME (HOURS)
TIME (HOURS)
TIME (HOURS)
1330 - 1345 1245 - 1300
TIM E (HOURS)
Annexure 4.9
1930 - 1945 1800 - 1815
1800 - 1815 1845 - 1900
1845 - 1900
Page 1 of 3
2145 - 2200
PCUs
Vehicles
PCUs
Vehicles
PCUs
Vehicles
RITES LTD
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
1000
1200
1400
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
500
200
400
600
800
200
400
600
800
200
400
600
800
0
0
0
0
0600 - 0615 0600 - 0615 0600 - 0615 0600 - 0615
TIME (HOURS)
TIME (HOURS)
TIM E (HOURS)
TIM E (HOURS)
1245 - 1300 1245 - 1300
1245 - 1300 1245 - 1300
1330 - 1345 1330 - 1345
1330 - 1345 1330 - 1345
1415 - 1430 1415 - 1430
1415 - 1430 1415 - 1430
1500 - 1515 1500 - 1515
1500 - 1515 1500 - 1515
1545 - 1600 1545 - 1600
1545 - 1600 1545 - 1600
1630 - 1645 1630 - 1645
1630 - 1645 1630 - 1645
1715 - 1730 1715 - 1730
1715 - 1730 1715 - 1730
1800 - 1815 1800 - 1815
1800 - 1815 1800 - 1815
1845 - 1900 1845 - 1900
1845 - 1900 1845 - 1900
1930 - 1945 1930 - 1945
1930 - 1945 1930 - 1945
2015 - 2030 2015 - 2030
2015 - 2030 2015 - 2030
2100 - 2115 2100 - 2115
2100 - 2115 2100 - 2115
2145 - 2200 2145 - 2200
2145 - 2200 2145 - 2200
PCUs
Vehicles
PCUs
Vehicles
PCUs
Vehicles
PCUs
Vehicles
NUMBER OF VECHILES NUMBER OF VECHILES
NUMBER OF VECHILES NUMBER OF VECHILES
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
1000
1500
2000
2500
500
500
500
500
0
0
0
TIME (HOURS)
TIME (HOURS)
1245 - 1300
TIM E (HOURS)
TIME (HOURS)
1245 - 1300
1245 - 1300 1245 - 1300
1330 - 1345 1330 - 1345
1330 - 1345 1330 - 1345
1415 - 1430 1415 - 1430
Annexure 4.9
1845 - 1900
1845 - 1900
1845 - 1900 1845 - 1900
1930 - 1945
Page 2 of 3
1930 - 1945
1930 - 1945 1930 - 1945
2015 - 2030
2015 - 2030
2015 - 2030 2015 - 2030
2100 - 2115
2100 - 2115
2100 - 2115 2100 - 2115
2145 - 2200
2145 - 2200
2145 - 2200 2145 - 2200
PCUs
Vehicles
PCUs
Vehicles
PCUs
Vehicles
PCUs
Vehicles
RITES LTD
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
500
500
0
0
0600 - 0615 0600 - 0615
19_HOUSING BOARD
1115 - 1130 1115 - 1130
TIME (HOURS)
TIM E (HOURS)
1245 - 1300 1245 - 1300
1845 - 1900
1845 - 1900
1930 - 1945
1930 - 1945
2015 - 2030
2015 - 2030
2100 - 2115
2100 - 2115
2145 - 2200
2145 - 2200
PCUs
Vehicles
PCUs
Vehicles
NUMBER OF VECHILES
NMBER OF VECHILES
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
500
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
200
400
600
800
0
0
0600 - 0615
0600 - 0615
0645 - 0700
0645 - 0700
0730 - 0745
0730 - 0745
0815 - 0830
TIM E (HOURS)
TIME (HOURS)
1245 - 1300
1245 - 1300
1330 - 1345
1330 - 1345
1415 - 1430
1415 - 1430
Annexure 4.9
1845 - 1900
1845 - 1900
1930 - 1945
Page 3 of 3
1930 - 1945
2015 - 2030 2015 - 2030
PCUs
Vehicles
PCUs
Vehicles
Annexure 5.1
PREPARATION OF COMPREHENSIVE MOBILITY PLAN FOR CHANDIGARH URBAN COMPLEX
SURVEY BY RITES LTD. FOR CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION (CA)
PARKING (PATROL)
2 TYPE OF VEHICLE
PARKED
3 REGISTRATION OF S. No.
1
THE VEHICLE 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
4 NUMBER OF
VEHICLES *
5 REMARKS
NOTE : * VEHICLES WITHOUT ANY REGISTRATION NUMBERS LIKE CYCLE, CYCLE RICKSHAW, ETC.
Annexure 6.1
PREPARATION OF COMPREHENSIVE MOBILITY PLAN FOR CHANDIGARH URBAN COMPLEX
SURVEY BY RITES LTD. FOR CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION (CA)
Passenger Boarding / Alighting Survey at Bus/Rail/Airport Terminals
Name of Terminal :…………………………….. Day/Date……………………………..
PASSENGER TERMINAL SURVEY (RAIL TERMINALS Origin-Destination Survey for Boarding Passengers)
by RITES Ltd. (A Govt. of India Enterprise) for CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION
COMPREHENSIVE MOBILITY PLAN FOR CHANDIGARH URBAN COMPLEX
DAY: DATE:
FORM NO:
Name of Enumerator: Name of Supervisor:
PASSENGER TERMINAL SURVEY (BUS TERMINALS Origin-Destination Survey for Boarding Passengers)
by RITES Ltd. (A Govt. of India Enterprise) for CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION
COMPREHENSIVE MOBILITY PLAN FOR CHANDIGARH URBAN COMPLEX
DAY : DATE :
FORM NO :
Name of Enumerator : Name of Supervisor :
Initial Origin of Details of reaching Bus Stop from initial origin Trip Commuter/Occas
Time Destination
Origin Bus Stop Mode Travel Time Travel Cost Purpose ional Traveler
Annexure 6.1C
PASSENGER TERMINAL SURVEY (AIRPORT TERMINALS Origin-Destination Survey for Boarding Passengers)
by RITES Ltd. (A Govt. of India Enterprise) for CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION
COMPREHENSIVE MOBILITY PLAN FOR CHANDIGARH URBAN COMPLEX
DAY: DATE:
FORM NO:
Name of Enumerator: Name of Supervisor:
FORM NO : DATE :
2. ADDRESS OF HOUSEHOLD :
3. TELEPHONE NO.:
10
11
STATED PREFERENCE
1 Would you like to shift to good public transport? YES NO
IF YES
2 Will you shift to proposed system if time saved in relation to bus travel / own mode is
(1) < 5 minutes (2) 5-10 minutes
(3) 10-15 minutes (4) 15-20 minutes (5) 20-30 minutes (6) > 30 minutes
3 How much extra fare are you Willing to pay (in relation to existing Bus Fare) (1) Same Fare, (2) 1.25 Times,
(3) 1.5 Times (4) 2 Times (5) 2.5 Times
4 Will you shift if origin-destination accessible to proposed system
(1) Both origin and destination
(2) only one of origin or Destination
(3) None of origin and destination
5 What is the maximum acceptable walking distance from home to proposed system station? : __________(m)
6 What is the maximum acceptable walking distance from proposed system station to office? : __________(m)
7 Would you accept if you have to change the route or mode. (1) Once
(2) Twice
8 Will you shift to public transport if the operating cost of private transport will be increased by
a) 25% b) 50% c) 75% d) 100% e) Will Never Shift
9 Will you shift to public transport if the parking fee paid by you will be increased by
a) 50% b) 100% c) 150% d) 200% e) Will Never Shift
CODING INSTRUCTIONS
Education: (1)Below 10th, (2)10th to 12th, (3) Graduate, (4) Post Graduate, (5) Illiterate, (6) Child, (7) Professional
Occupation: (1) Govt. Service, (2) Pvt.Service, (3) Business, (4) Student, (5) Housewife, (6) Retired,
(7) Unemployed, (8) Others
RITES LTD
Page 1 of 2
COMPREHENSIVE MOBILITY PLAN FOR CHANDIGARH URBAN COMPLEX Annexure 7.1
Link 1: Start to Boarding Point Link 2 : Main Trip Link 3 : Alighting Point to Final Destination
Mem. No. Trip No. Start Time Trip Distance Travel Time Travel Cost Waiting Time Distance Travel Time Travel Cost Waiting Time Distance Travel Time Travel Cost Waiting Time
Origin Destination Mode Mode Mode
Purpose (in Km.) (inMins) (in Rs.) (in Min.) (in Km.) (inMins) (in Rs.) (in Min.) (in Km.) (inMins) (in Rs.) (in Min.)
Trip Purpose: (1) Govt. Service, (2) Pvt.Service, (3)Business (4)Education, (5)Shopping, (6)Social/Others (7) Return Govt (8) Return Private (9)Return Business (10) Return Education (11) Return Shopping
(12)Return Social/Others
Mode of Travel : (1) Car, (2)Two Wheeler, (3) Auto, (4) Shared Auto, (5) Bus, (6) Cycle, (7) Cycle Rickshaw, (8) Train, (9) Walk
RITES LTD.
Page 2 of 2