0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
111 Ansichten1 Seite
THE PETERS COMPANY PROJECT
In 1980, Corwin accepted a specialty-product assignment from Peters Company
because of the potential for follow-on work. In 1981 and 1982, and again in 1983,
profitable follow-on contracts were received, and a good working relationship developed,
despite Peters’ reputation for being a difficult customer to work with.
318 CORWIN CORPORATION
President
Market
Support
Contracts
Project
Management
Dick Potts Dan West
R&D
Dr. Reddy
Engineering
Support
VP Marketing
Gene Frime
THE PETERS COMPANY PROJECT
In 1980, Corwin accepted a specialty-product assignment from Peters Company
because of the potential for follow-on work. In 1981 and 1982, and again in 1983,
profitable follow-on contracts were received, and a good working relationship developed,
despite Peters’ reputation for being a difficult customer to work with.
318 CORWIN CORPORATION
President
Market
Support
Contracts
Project
Management
Dick Potts Dan West
R&D
Dr. Reddy
Engineering
Support
VP Marketing
Gene Frime
THE PETERS COMPANY PROJECT
In 1980, Corwin accepted a specialty-product assignment from Peters Company
because of the potential for follow-on work. In 1981 and 1982, and again in 1983,
profitable follow-on contracts were received, and a good working relationship developed,
despite Peters’ reputation for being a difficult customer to work with.
318 CORWIN CORPORATION
President
Market
Support
Contracts
Project
Management
Dick Potts Dan West
R&D
Dr. Reddy
Engineering
Support
VP Marketing
Gene Frime
In 1980, Corwin accepted a specialty-product assignment from Peters Company
because of the potential for follow-on work. In 1981 and 1982, and again in 1983, profitable follow-on contracts were received, and a good working relationship developed, despite Peters’ reputation for being a difficult customer to work with. 318 CORWIN CORPORATION President Market Support Contracts Project Management Dick Potts Dan West R&D Dr. Reddy Engineering Support VP Marketing Gene Frimel VP Engineering Dr. Royce VP Manufacturing Exhibit I. Organizational chart for Corwin Corporation On December 7, 1982, Gene Frimel, the vice president of marketing at Corwin, received a rather unusual phone call from Dr. Frank Delia, the marketing vice president at Peters Company. Frank Delia: “Gene, I have a rather strange problem on my hands. Our R&D group has $250,000 committed for research toward development of a new rubber product material, and we simply do not have the available personnel or talent to undertake the project. We have to go outside. We’d like your company to do the work. Our testing and R&D facilities are already overburdened.” Gene Frimel: “Well, as you know, Frank, we are not a research group even though we’ve done this once before for you. And furthermore, I would never be able to sell our management on such an undertaking. Let some other company do the R&D work and then we’ll take over on the production end.” Delia: “Let me explain our position on this. We’ve been burned several times in the past. Projects like this generate several patents, and the R&D company almost always requires that our contracts give them royalties or first refusal for manufacturing rights.” Frimel: “I understand your problem, but it’s not within our capabilities. This project, if undertaken, could disrupt parts of our organization. We’re already operating lean in engineering.” Delia: “Look, Gene! The bottom line is this:We have complete confidence in your manufacturing ability to such a point that we’re willing to commit to a five-year production contract if the product can be developed. That makes it extremely profitable for you.”