Sie sind auf Seite 1von 7

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/321492862

Marine diesel engine flue gas desulphurization by seawater


scrubbing in a structured packing absorption column

Conference Paper · June 2017

CITATION READS

1 441

4 authors, including:

Domenico Flagiello Alessandro Erto


University of Naples Federico II University of Naples Federico II
7 PUBLICATIONS   4 CITATIONS    124 PUBLICATIONS   1,277 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Thermodynamic analysis of single and binary adsorption of Food Yellow 4 and Food Blue 2 on CC-chitosan: Application of statistical
physics and IAST models View project

Flue Gas Desulphurization Wet-Scrubbing using structured packing towers View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Domenico Flagiello on 04 December 2017.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


40th Meeting of the Italian Section of the Combustion Institute

MARINE DIESEL ENGINE FLUE GAS DESULPHURIZATION BY


SEAWATER SCRUBBING IN A STRUCTURED PACKING
ABSORPTION COLUMN

D. Flagiello, F. Di Natale, A. Erto, A. Lancia


domenico.flagiello@unina.it
Department of Chemical, Materials and Production Engineering of the University
of Naples “Federico II”, P.le V. Tecchio, 80 - 80125 Napoli

Abstract
In this work, we present experimental and modelling studies on the removal of SO2
from marine engine exhaust by using a structured packing seawater scrubber. The
absorption tests were performed in a packed column filled with a Mellapak 250X®
packing using a model seawater either with or without NaOH addition. The model
flue gas contained 500 ppmv of SO2, which is a typical value of the exhausts
deriving from marine engines fueled with IFO. The liquid-to-gas ratio, L/G was
varied between 1.25 and 4.06 L·m-3. A 99% of the removal efficiency was obtained
at liquid-to-gas ratio about to 3.43 L·m-3 and wash water pH was near to neutrality
(6.2-6.7). Experiments were interpreted through a purposely calibrated simulation
model run in Aspen Plus®, which required additional tests to assess equilibrium
and mass transfer rate data. The comparison with experiments demonstrated the
excellent description capacity of the model, encouraging its application to scrubber
scale up.

Introduction
Sulphur dioxide is one of the primary air pollutants with extensive and proved
damages to human health and the environment. In the last year, maritime
transportation was subjected to increasingly severe restrictions on sulphur
compounds emissions. Currently, the compliance with regulations is mostly
provided by the use of a cleaner, but more expensive, fuel or by the use of wet
scrubbers. In the last 15 years, marine scrubbers, based on the use of seawater,
sometimes with the addition of caustic soda, reached a good maturity level, but the
commonly adopted technology of the spray towers mostly reached their optimal
level, and is not further able to provide improvements of the process efficiency
without considering a CAPEX and OPEX intensive oversizing.
Indeed, while conventional marine spray towers assure lowest possible pressure
drop, thus preserving from engine backpressure, these units usually have low mass
transfer rates and to contain their height within acceptable level, they are usually
operated with large liquid-to-gas ratio, often spanning between 6 and 10 L·m-3 for
the absorption phase only [1]. Besides, spray towers are bulky equipment. As an
alternative, towers with structured packings (i.e. with low pressure drops and high
mass transfer rates) may be a reliable option to reduce space and water
consumption on board ship.
40th Meeting of the Italian Section of the Combustion Institute

This work is part of an ongoing research aimed to design new seawater scrubbers
for marine application, able to assure 99% SO2 reduction from marine diesel
exhausts fueled with a 2-3%wt sulphur Intermediate Fuel Oil (IFO). Experiments
were performed at 1 atm and 25°C, with a model flue-gas containing a SO2
concentration equal to 500 ppmv, on a cold model lab scale seawater scrubber
filled with a structured packing (Mellapak 250X®). Model seawaters either with or
without addition of NaOH were adopted. The liquid-to-gas ratio, L/G, was varied
between 1.25 and 4.06 L·m-3. The absorption tests were analysed in light of
purposely selected and fine-tuned models for the absorption equilibrium and
dynamics, suitably implemented in the Chemical Process Simulation software
Aspen Plus® V 8.6.

Experimental set-up and analytical methods


Figure 1 shows the experimental set-up for absorption tests, which was descripted
in details elsewhere [2]. The simulated flue-gas was made by mixing air (technical
grade) and SO2 (2% mol·mol-1 in N2) supplied from a cylinder at high pressure
(Rivoira Gas Srl). The absorbing solutions were: (a) a seawater at pH 8.2 and (b) a
basic solution obtained by adding 200 mg·L-1 of NaOH to the seawater to achieve
pH 9.4. Sodium hydroxide (99.9%) was provided from VWR International
Chemicals. The alkaline and saline content of the seawater were equal to 670
mg·L-1 (carbonate and bicarbonate) and 30 g·kg-1, respectively.
Experimental tests of SO2 removal from the simulated flue-gas were carried out in
a packed column (i.d.:10 mm; length: 1.6 m) operating at 25°C and 1 atm. The
absorption column was filled with a structured packing (Mellapak 250X® by Sulzer
Chemtech) and the total packing height was of 892 mm. Mellapak 250X® has a
nominal area of 250 m2·m-3 and a void fraction about of 98%. During the tests, the
gas flow rate was kept at 32 m3·h-1 with an SO2 inlet concentration of 500 ppmv.
The absorbing solution feed flow rate was varied from 40 to 130 L·h-1

Figure 1. Experimental set-up for SO2 absorption tests.


40th Meeting of the Italian Section of the Combustion Institute

The experimental set up allowed fine-tuning and control of gas and liquid flow rate
and of SO2 concentration in the inlet gas. Besides, it was possible to accurately
measure temperature and pressure drop along the column. Determination of the
SO2 removal efficiency was based on the direct measure of SO2 concentration at
the inlet and the outlet of the column, by an ABB O2020® Advanced optima
process gas analyzer, while the washwater pH were measured by a digital pH-
meter by ThermoScientific ORION Start, A111 pH Meter model.

Absorber design equations


The main equations for absorber design are the packing height of the column [3]
and gas pressure drop in wet conditions [4]:

(1)

(2)

Equation (1) can be written as the product of two parameters, NTU and HTU [3].
The number of transfer unit (NTU) is a purely extensive parameter that depends on
the absorption driving force, given by the L/G ratio, and the equilibrium
conditions. To describe the equilibrium of SO2 absorption in seawater, the
approach proposed by Flagiello et al. [2] was adopted. This approach is based on a
detailed study of the physical solubility data set, equilibrium reaction constants for
SO2 chemical absorption and Electrolyte-NRTL equations for activity coefficient
estimations in liquid phase.
The height of transfer unit (HTU) is a mass transfer rate parameter that account for
the mass transfer coefficients into the gas and liquid films, the effective wet
surface, the solubility data and the reaction kinetics effects. The global coefficient
to mass transfer (Kgl·ae) for dilute system can be reformulated as sum of the
resistance of mass transfer in liquid and in gas film:

(3)

Several predictive models were proposed in the literature to assess the mass
transfer coefficients in structured packing absorption towers (e.g. [5-8]). In
particular, this paper adopted the Billet and Shultes method [7] to estimate the
Kgl·ae coefficient for the investigated system. This is a descriptive model and is
based on the assessment of two corrective parameters for estimation of the mass
transfer in liquid and gas film respectively. In particular, the liquid corrective
parameter (CL) is determined from tests of SO2 absorption in HCl solution at pH 3,
while the gas corrective parameter (CG) is determined from tests on SO2 absorption
40th Meeting of the Italian Section of the Combustion Institute

with NaOH solution at pH 9.4. The results of these tests and the actual values of CL
(0.90) and CG (0.55) are reported in details in D’Amore et al. [9]. Once calculated
experimental values of kL and kG using Equation (1), the corrective parameters (C L
and CG) can be evaluated.
Also pressure drop correlations play an important role in determining the design of
absorption column. To this end, the actual pressure drop in wet conditions were
compared with the Equation (2), which was specifically developed for structured
packing. This equation correlate ΔPwet with the liquid holdup and the pressure drop
in dry conditions (ΔPdry). The thermodynamic model [2], the mass transfer rate
models [7] and the model for pressure drop evaluation [4] were implemented in an
Aspen Plus® V 8.6 simulation in steady-state conditions. The model predictions
were compared with the experiments in terms of washwater pH and SO2 removal
efficiency.

Results and discussion


Experimental results of absorption tests are reported in Figure 2. Figure 2A shows
that the addition of sodium hydroxide provides a substantial increase of the
removal efficiency for L/G values below than 3.1 L·m3. A 99% removal efficiency
of sulphur dioxide was obtained when L/G was about to 3.4 L·m-3, which is far
lower than the conventional values adopted in spray towers [1,10]. Figure 2B
shows that the washwater pH is near to neutrality at high removal efficiency of SO2
for both absorbing solutions. Indeed, the final pH was equal to 6.2 and 6.7 at 99%
of absorption efficiency for seawater and basic solution, respectively. The pressure
drop per meter of packing recorded in these operating conditions varied between
2.9 and 3.7 mmH2O·m-1 and reached 55% of the flooding point at the maximum
L/G investigated. This is a very low value, lower than the typical pressure drop of
demister commonly applied in spray tower (between 20-500 mmH2O with Koch-
Glitsch® demister). Therefore, the proposed system is not expected to generate
appreciable increases of the pressure drop compared with spray towers.
The simulation results using Billet and Shultes model [7] are reported in Figure 3
in terms of parity diagrams for pH and SO2 removal efficiency, showing a very
good prediction of data. Simultaneously, the Stichlmair et al. [4] hydrodynamic
model allows a very good prediction of the experimental data in the investigated
conditions (Figure 4).

Conclusion
This work provides experimental and modelling data on the design of packed tower
for the seawater scrubbing of SO2 from marine engine exhausts. The absorption
tests in packed column with Mellapak 250X® indicate that a removal efficiency
above than 99% can be achieved by using liquid-to-gas mass ratio about to 3.4
L·m-3. The NaOH addition allows reaching the same efficiency with a saving of
about 0.2 L·m-3. The packed tower pressure drop are negligibly higher than those
of a spray tower. The implementation of a set of specific equations for absorber
40th Meeting of the Italian Section of the Combustion Institute

design (not discussed here) indicates a strong consistency with the experiments,
and suggests its use for scale up purposes.

Figure 2. Experimental SO2 removal efficiency (A) and wash water pH (B).

Figure 3. Comparison between experimental and modelling results [7] of SO2


removal efficiency (A) and wash water pH (B).

Figure 4. Comparison between experimental and modelling results [2] on packing


tower pressure drops.

Nomenclature
y°SO2 initial gas mole fraction, mol·mol-1
ySO2 final gas mole fraction, mol·mol-1
40th Meeting of the Italian Section of the Combustion Institute

y generic gas mole fraction, mol·mol-1


G gas molar flow rate, mol·s-1
S section of column, m2
Z packing height of the column, m
kG gas mass transfer coefficient, m·s-1
kL liquid mass transfer coefficient, m·s-1
ae effective wetted surface, m-2·m-3
E enhancement factor for liquid reaction, -
m slope of the solubility curve, -
ΔPwet pressure drop in wetted conditions, mbar
ΔPdry pressure drop in dry conditions, mbar
ε void fraction of the packing, m-3·m-3
hL liquid hold-up, m-3·m-3

References
[1] Caiazzo, G., Langella, G., Miccio, F., Scala, F., “An experimental
investigation on seawater SO2 scrubbing for marine application”,
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 32-4:1179-1186 (2013).
[2] Flagiello, D., Erto, A., Di Natale, F., Lancia, A., “Experimental and
modelling analysis of seawater scrubbers for sulphur dioxide removal in
coal-fired power plants”, submitted to Fuel (2017).
[3] Coulson, J.M., Sinnott, R.K., Richardson, J.F., Coulson and Richardson’s
chemical engineering, chemical engineering design Vol. 6, 1999.
[4] Stichlmair, J., Bravo, J. L., & Fair, J. R., “General model for prediction of
pressure drop and capacity of countercurrent gas/liquid packed columns”,
Gas Separation & Purification, 3-1:19-28 (1989).
[5] Bravo, J.L., Rocha, J.A., Fair, J.R, “Mass transfer in gauze packings”,
Hydrocarbon processing 64-1:91-95 (1985).
[6] Bravo, J.L., Rocha, J.A., Fair, J.R, “A comprehensive model for the
performance of columns containing structured packings”, In Institution of
Chemical Engineers Symposium Series 128:A489-A489 (1992).
[7] Billet, R., & Schultes, M., “Predicting mass transfer in packed columns”,
Chemical engineering & technology, 16-1:1-9 (1993).
[8] Brunazzi, E., & Paglianti, A., “Liquid-film mass-transfer coefficient in a
column equipped with structured packings”, Industrial & engineering
chemistry research 36-9:3792-3799 (1997).
[9] D’Amore, D., Lancia, A., Di Natale, F., Flagiello, D., Erto, A.,
“Experimental and modelling analysis of a seawater scrubber with Mellapak
250X® for SO2 removal”, Master thesis in chemical engineering at
University of Naples, Federico II (2017).
[10] Darake, S., Hatamipour, M. S., Rahimi, A., Hamzeloui, P., “SO2 removal by
seawater in a spray tower: Experimental study and mathematical modeling”,
Chemical Engineering Research and Design 109:180-189 (2016).

View publication stats

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen