Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Per. 2
12-11
The topic of teen privacy is a hot debate: Lisa Damour, writer for the New York Times,
says in her article, “Is Snooping on Teenagers Ever O.K.?”, “Adolescence comes with a thorny
problem: Teenagers suddenly yearn for privacy just when their lives are expanding to include a
range of risky new opportunities.” Teen’s rights have been changing over the years with new
technologies and ways of life. One major right that is discussed if teen privacy and how to
protect the teen and keep them safe. While we should all be protected, adults and teens alike,
teen privacy should not be infringed for the righteous cause of keeping them safe. Teens should
Increases to security and surveillance technology in schools for the sole purpose of
monitoring students in their own school is a dangerous invasion of privacy. “This week the
district’s eight public schools began testing a system called Aegis, which includes facial
recognition technology, that could eventually be used to track and map student movement in our
schools” (Shultz 1). This system is dangerous and has potentially long lasting effects. The facial
recognition could be dangerous to a student’s reputation because it does not work correctly on
women and people of color. Furthermore, the ability of the system to track who certain
individuals were around can lead to a guilty by association accusations and punishments. “In
2015, in the wake of Sandy Hook and other high-profile school shootings, our district was
approached by Tony Olivo, a security consultant, who offered to do a free threat assessment of
our schools” (Shultz 1). The strategic timing of Mr. Olivo’s shady, thinly veiled sales pitch
shows that the birth of the idea of using this security system comes from fear and money. The
original purpose of the system was to catch cheaters and thieves in casinos. The Aegis system is
On another note, teens should have the same rights to privacy as adults because, when
their privacy is invaded, they have very adult reactions. “‘When parents engage in behaviors that
teenagers see as privacy invasions’ Dr. Hawk said,’It backfires because parents end up knowing
less’” (Damour 2). When teens have their privacy invaded by a parent, they begin taking steps to
protect themselves. Commonly, the invaded teen will stop being as sharing and open with their
parents, and start hiding aspects of their personal life. “A survey of 455 adolescents found that
teenagers who believed their parents had secretly listened in on their conversations or searched
through their possessions without permission shared less information with their folks than
teenagers who felt their parents respected appropriate boundaries” (Damour 2). In addition to
teens not trusting parents who snoop, research on Dutch families has shown that teens of
invasive parents were not misbehaving any more that those with parents who do not snoop.
Some say, “Parents have a right to survei their own children” (Damour 1). This is true,
however, Avidian Cover, an associate law professor at Case Western Reserve University tells us,
“Those rights don’t always extend to other children or adults. They can get into murky legal
territory if they find themselves surveilling other participants in a conversation” (Damour 1).
When parents intrude on a teen’s life, they can find themselves intruding on the lives of other
teens. If they find themselves watching their child’s interactions with another child, the legality
of the situation becomes questionable. How does this affect their child? It drives them away.
Evidence, as stated earlier, has consistently shown that teens of parents who snoop start to shut
out their parents from their private lives. Overbearing parents running the lives of their children
is a mental handicap at best. At its worst, it produces a society of dependent adults who will have
Teens should be trusted to keep themselves safe and expect the same privacy rights as
adults. Intrusive, dangerous surveillance technology will do more harm to the safety of students
in schools, as will covert intrusions of their lives by parents. The law should protect teens when
their privacy is unfairly disregarded. That is the way we should protect teens.