Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION (DPR) OF MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK,
DOTI (11KM); UNDER CONTRACT NO: PMEU/337159/073/74 DPR-49.”
Government of Nepal
Ministry of Physical Infrastructure & Transport,
Department of Roads,
Planning and Design Branch,
Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation Unit,
Babarmahal, Kathmandu, Recent: Chakupat, Lalitpur.
FINAL REPORT
2017
This document is the final report prepared for the project, “DETAILED ENGINEERING
SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION (DPR) of MAUWA
NGARDAH SADAK,DOTI(14 KM); UNDER CONTRACT NO: PMEU/337159/073/74 DPR-
49.”, undertaken by Government of Nepal, Ministry of Physical Infrastructure & Transport,
Department of Roads, Planning and Design Branch, Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation Unit,
Chakupat, Patandhoka, Lalitpur. This document has been prepared by Joint Venture Firm of
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.FJV for Department of Roads, PMEU, Lalitpur. The opinions, findings and
conclusions expressed herein are those of the Consultant and do not necessarily reflect those of
Department of Roads.
Reproduction of materials contained in this document and in case, where maps, diagrams, data,
images and photos from the report or accompanying DVD ROM are used, the following citation
shall be used as: GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV“DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY,
DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION (DPR) OF MAUWA NGARDAH
SADAK,DOTI(14 KM); UNDER CONTRACT NO: PMEU/337159/073/74 DPR-49”in Doti
district.
Data Sources and Credits
Datasets, drawings and other miscellaneous data are produced/developed by GEOCE-UNIQUE-
Y.G.F JV or the project during 2017. These data are owned by Government of Nepal, Ministry of
Physical Infrastructure & Transport, Department of Roads, Planning and Design Branch, Planning
Monitoring and Evaluation Unit, Chakupat, Patandhoka, Lalitpur. Authorization from the owner is
required for the usage and/or publication of the data in part or whole.
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | i
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION (DPR) OF MAUWA NGARDAH
SADAK,DOTI(11KM); UNDER CONTRACT NO: PMEU/337159/073/74 DPR-49.”
PROJECT INFORMATION
PROJECT INFORMATION
Name of the (DPR) OF MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI(14 KM); UNDER CONTRACT NO:
Government of Nepal,
Ministry of Physical Infrastructure & Transport,
Project Executing Department of Roads,
Agency Planning and Design Branch,
Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation Unit,
Babarmahal, Kathmandu, Recent: Chakupat, Lalitpur
Government of Nepal,
Ministry of Physical Infrastructure & Transport,
Implementing Department of Roads,
Agency Planning and Design Branch,
Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation Unit,
Babarmahal,Kathmandu,Recent:Chakupat, Lalitpur
Joint Venture Firm of GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV
Lalitpur, Nepal
Name of the Tel: 977-1-5521175,5545542, 5549332
Consultant Fax: 977-1-5526096, 5549332
Email:geoce@info.com.np,unecnepal@gmail.com
Website: www.geoceconsulants.com,www.unecnepal.com.np
Project -
Commencement
Date
Date of Final 22/09/2017
Report
Submission
Date of Project -
Completion
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | ii
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION (DPR) OF BANINIYA MAHUKI
TRAFFIC CHOK SADAK, SAPTARI(21KM); UNDER CONTRACT NO: PMEU/337366/073/74 DPR5.”
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
SUBMISSION INFORMATION
Three
No. of Volume I: Main Report
Volumes Volume II: Drawings (Plan, Profile & Typical Drawings)
Volume III: Cost Estimate with Quantity Details
Version No 1.0
Date of Final 22/09/2017
Report
Submission
Submission Hard Copy
Type
Copies For Client : 2 (Two) (1 Copy - Colour) For Consultant : 1 (one)
Produced (1 Copy - B/W) (1 Copy - B/W)
Joint Venture Firm of GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV
Lalitpur, Nepal
Tel: 977-1-5521175,5545542, 5549332
Prepared By
Fax: 977-1-5526096, 5549332
Email:geoce@info.com.np,unecnepal@gmail.com
Website: www.geoceconsulants.com,www.unecnepal.com.np
Checked By
Reviewed By
Official
Stamp
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We would like to express our gratitude towards Department of Roads, Planning Branch, Planning,
Monitoring and Evaluation Unit for providing us the valuable opportunity for performing the
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT
PREPARATION (DPR) OF MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK,DOTI (14 KM); UNDER
CONTRACT NO: PMEU/337159/073/74 DPR-49.”We, Joint Venture Firm of GEOCE-
UNIQUE-Y.G.F.expresses its sincere thanks to Engineers and Sub – Engineers of Planning
Monitoring and Evaluation Unit for their valuable suggestions and help during the whole study
period and preparation of this report.
We would like to express its indebted to all supporting staff of Department of Roads, Planning,
Monitoring and Evaluation Unit, who helped us directly-indirectly to the preparation of report of
this forms. So we would like to extend our warm acknowledgement to all of them.
CONSULTANT
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F.JV
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | iv
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION (DPR) OF BANINIYA MAHUKI
TRAFFIC CHOK SADAK, SAPTARI(21KM); UNDER CONTRACT NO: PMEU/337366/073/74 DPR5.”
SYNOPSIS
SYNOPSIS
This report has been prepared as per the contract between Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation
Unit, Planning and Design Branch, Department of Roads as the Client and the Joint Venture Firm
of GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F.as the Consultant, as preparation of project report of DETAILED
ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION (DPR) OF
MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI(14 KM); UNDER CONTRACT NO:
PMEU/337159/073/74 DPR49.”This report is submitted as final report in accordance with the
given Terms of Reference (TOR).
This report consists of several chapters. For this purpose a multidisciplinary team of experts were
engaged for carrying out desk, field and office studies as well as analysis of all available primary
and secondary information and data pertaining to a variety of disciplines such as: topography,
geomorphology, geology, geo-techniques, hydrology, sociology, demography, economy, traffics,
agriculture, forestry, ecology, design and drawing of surveyed road of the area and districts. Study
of the characteristics of the area to be influenced directly by the construction of the road was given
due stress. All these studies helped to understand the project area in terms of physical models into
which the task fitting the road in the most optimal fashion, without any potential adverse impact to
environment.
Chapter 1 of the report highlights the general introduction, location of project, significance,
connection with other road network and map study.
Chapter 2 of the report highlights the socio-economic profile of the influenced municipality and
VDCs. It highlights change in demographic trend, land use pattern, utility services, economic
activity, health, education, transport and communication network and administrative facilities.
Chapter 3 of the report highlights the traffic studies and design of pavement. It describes about
present traffic data, present transportation mode and it’s reliability, adjustment of traffic volume in
comparison with increased population and production, traffic forecasts and projection, traffic safety
and pavement design according to DCP test result.
Chapter 4 of the report highlights the detailed engineering survey. It describes about staff involved
with survey works, procedure of survey activities, establishment of BM and IP points, geometric
standard followed as per Nepal Road Standard 2070 for feeder road.
Chapter 5 of the report highlights the engineering study and inventory survey. It describes about
road inventory survey, construction materials survey, geological and geo-technical survey,
hydrological and meteorological studies of the studied road alignment.
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | v
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION (DPR) OF BANINIYA MAHUKI
TRAFFIC CHOK SADAK, SAPTARI(21KM); UNDER CONTRACT NO: PMEU/337366/073/74 DPR5.”
SYNOPSIS
Chapter 6 of the report highlights the design and drawings. It describes about the design
parameters followed during design of road, about design software and preparation of drawings as
mentioned.
Chapter 7 of the report highlights the environment study. It describes about benefits and impact on
physical and biological environment due to road upgradation and recommends mitigating plans and
measures.
Chapter 8 of the report highlights the preparation of detailed project report. It describes about
detailed project cost estimate, rate analysis, quantity estimate, bill of quantities and summary of
quantity and project cost.
Annexes of the report consist of following information:
Annex I : Topographic, Google, SRN and District Maps
Annex II : Photographs of Road Inventory Survey, DCP Test & Detailed Engineering Survey
Annex III : References
BM and Station Data
DCP Test Result
Construction Material Test Result
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | vi
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION (DPR) OF BANINIYA MAHUKI
TRAFFIC CHOK SADAK, SAPTARI(21KM); UNDER CONTRACT NO: PMEU/337366/073/74 DPR5.”
ABBREVIATION
ABBREVIATION
HH House Hold
B. Location:
B.1 Geographic Location:
Region : Far Western Development Region
Zone : Seti
District : Doti
Latitude : 29°17'9.18"N to 29°18'43.04"N
Longitude : 80°54'26.09"Eto 80°54'38.01"E
Chainage : 0+000 – 14+000 Km
B.2 Starting point and end point of the alignment:
Starting point : Amaltukra
Ending point : Nagar Daha, Mauwa
B.3 Geographical Features:
3.1 Terrain : Rolling and Hilly
3.2 Climate : Tropical, Sub Tropical, Temperate to Alpine
3.3 Geology : Boulder Mixed Soil (BMS), Phyllite, Quartzite,
Metamorphosed mica - schist and Gneiss. Rocky
Slope Type, Covered with colluvial soil cover at the
foot of the
Mountain at the river valley; Rocky Slope Type.
3.4 Hydrology : Main Rivers SetiNadi, PatalaKhola,
Sasam Gad Khola,
KapartolaKhola, GodareKhola, RuwaKhola,
KhaniKhola
3.5 Metrology : Average Annual Rainfall is 1145 mm
C. Classification of Road :
C.1 Classification: A. Adminsitrative Classification: District Road
B. Technical/ Functional Classification: As 20 years
perspective period ADT is between 2000 and 5000
PCU, the road falls under Class III road as per NRS
2027 (Second Revision 2070)
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | ix
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION (DPR) OF BANINIYA MAHUKI
TRAFFIC CHOK SADAK, SAPTARI(21KM); UNDER CONTRACT NO: PMEU/337366/073/74 DPR5.”
Ruling gradient:
The term ruling grade is usually used as a synonym for "steepest climb" between two points on a
railroad. More simply the steepest grade to be climbed dictates how powerful the locomotive must
be (or how light the train) in order to complete the run without assistance. A typical ruling gradient
could be 1:50 (2%).
Design Parameters:
Adopted Value (As per NRS
S.N. Design Parameters
2070)
1 Design Speed 40 km/hr
2 Right of Way both side from road centreline 10 m
3 Formation width 8.5m
4 Carriageway width 7m
5 Shoulder width 0.75 m (Both Side)
6 Camber of Carriageway % Service Road 2.5%
7 Camber of Shoulder 3%
8 Minimum radius in horizontal curve 70 m
9 Minimum length of vertical curve 40 m
10 Maximum gradient 9%
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | x
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION (DPR) OF BANINIYA MAHUKI
TRAFFIC CHOK SADAK, SAPTARI(21KM); UNDER CONTRACT NO: PMEU/337366/073/74 DPR5.”
Cross-Section:
a. Right of way : 2*5 m
b. Formation width : 8.5m
d. Carriage-way width : 7m
e. Shoulder width : 2*0.75 m
Pavement:
Sub-Base (1) Materials: Gravel Coarse
(2) Thickness: 150mm
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | xi
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION (DPR) OF BANINIYA MAHUKI
TRAFFIC CHOK SADAK, SAPTARI(21KM); UNDER CONTRACT NO: PMEU/337366/073/74 DPR5.”
TABLE OF CONTENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DATA SOURCES AND CREDITS ................................................................................................................................... I
PROJECT INFORMATION ............................................................................................................................................. II
SUBMISSION INFORMATION .................................................................................................................................... III
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ............................................................................................................................................... IV
SYNOPSIS ........................................................................................................................................................................V
ABBREVIATION .......................................................................................................................................................... VII
SALIENT FEATURES OF THE PROJECT .................................................................................................................VIII
CHAPTER-I: INTRODUTION ....................................................................................................................................... 16
1.1. GENERAL ................................................................................................................................................. 16
1.2. LOCATION ............................................................................................................................................... 16
1.3. MAP STUDY ............................................................................................................................................ 17
CHAPTER-II: SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASPECT OF THE PROJECT AREA .................................................................. 18
2.1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 18
2.2 SOCIO- ECONOMIC DATA OF THE INFLUENCED AREA................................................................... 18
2.2.1 NATURE OF MIGRATION ....................................................................................................................... 19
2.2.2 LAND USE PATTERN ............................................................................................................................... 20
2.2.3 UTILITY SERVICES .................................................................................................................................. 21
2.2.3 ECONOMIC ACTIVITY ............................................................................................................................. 22
2.2.4 HEALTH .................................................................................................................................................... 25
2.2.5 EDUCATION ............................................................................................................................................. 25
CHAPTER-III: TRAFFIC STUDIES AND PAVEMENT DESIGN .............................................................................. 27
3.1 EXISTING ROADS AND TRAFFIC FLOW ........................................................................................... 27
3.2 TRAFFIC ESTIMATION.......................................................................................................................... 28
3.3 PAVEMENT DESIGN .............................................................................................................................. 34
3.4 DOR PAVEMENT DESIGN GUIDELINE METHOD (FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT) ............................... 34
3.5 IRC METHOD FOR DESIGN OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT .................................................................. 61
3.6 TRL OVERSEAS ROAD NOTE 31 METHOD ....................................................................................................... 70
3.7 TRAFFIC SAFETY AND CONTROLLERS ............................................................................................ 79
CHAPTER-IV: DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY ............................................................................................... 80
4.1 THE SURVEY TEAM .............................................................................................................................................. 80
4.2 PRE-SURVEY ACTIVITIES .................................................................................................................................... 80
4.3 TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY ................................................................................................................................. 80
4.4 FIXING OF GRADIENT BETWEEN CONSECUTIVE CONTROL POINTS ....................................................... 81
4.5 ESTABLISHMENT BENCH MARKS AND CONTROL POINTS......................................................................... 81
4.6 BENCH MARK SURVEY ........................................................................................................................................ 81
4.7 BASELINE SURVEY ............................................................................................................................................... 81
4.8 TRAVERSE SURVEY .............................................................................................................................................. 81
4.9 DATA ENTRY AND ANALYSIS............................................................................................................................ 81
CHAPTER-V: ENGINEERING STUDY AND INVENTORY SURVEY ..................................................................... 83
5.1 GENERAL ................................................................................................................................................. 83
5.2 ROAD INVENTORY SURVEY ............................................................................................................... 83
TABLE OF CONTENT
5.2.1 GPS CO-ORDINATE OF MAJOR LOCATION: ..................................................................................... 83
5.2.2 VISUAL SURVEY OF TOPOGRAPHY/CONDITION OF EXISTING ROAD & STRUCTURE: ........ 83
5.2.3 EXISTING CONDITION OF ROAD STRUCTURES: ............................................................................ 84
5.2.4 SIDE DRAIN REQUIREMENT: ........................................................................................................................... 84
5.2.5 CROSS DRAINAGE REQUIREMENT: .................................................................................................. 84
5.2.6 MASONARY RETAINING WALL REQUIREMENT ......................................................................................... 84
5.2.7 GABION RETAINING WALLS REQUIREMENT ................................................................................. 84
5.2.8 LAND USE AND SETTLEMENT PATTERN SURVEY: ....................................................................... 84
5.2.9 KERB STONE, HANDRAIL AND FOOTPATH REQUIREMENT ....................................................... 84
5.3 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS SURVEY ............................................................................................ 84
5.3.1 GEOLOGICAL AND GEO-TECHNICAL SURVEY .............................................................................. 85
5.4 COUNTERMEASURE ON THE ACCIDENT PRONE AREA AND HAZARDOUS LOCATIONS................... 87
5.5 USE OF SAFETY BARRIERS ............................................................................................................................... 87
5.9HYDROLOGICAL AND METEOROLOGICAL STUDY ....................................................................................... 88
CHAPTER-VI: DESIGN AND ....................................................................................................................................... 98
DRAWING ...................................................................................................................................................................... 98
6.1 GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARD ...................................................................................................... 98
6.2 DESIGN SPEED ....................................................................................................................................... 98
6.3 RIGHT OF WAY ...................................................................................................................................... 98
6.4 FORMATION WIDTH ............................................................................................................................. 99
6.5 EXTRA WIDENING ................................................................................................................................. 99
6.6 SIGHT DISTANCE ................................................................................................................................... 99
6.7 HORIZONTAL CURVES ......................................................................................................................... 99
6.8 VERTICAL CURVES ............................................................................................................................... 99
6.9 LONGITUDINAL SECTION ................................................................................................................... 99
6.10 CROSS SECTION ................................................................................................................................... 100
6.11 PASSING BAYS ..................................................................................................................................... 100
6.12 RETAINING STRUCTURES ................................................................................................................. 100
6.13 DRY STONE MASONRY WALL .......................................................................................................... 100
6.14 GABION MASONRY WALL ................................................................................................................ 101
6.15 WATER MANAGEMENT MEASURES ............................................................................................... 101
6.16 OUTWARD CROSS SLOPE .................................................................................................................. 102
6.17 SIDE DRAINS ......................................................................................................................................... 102
6.18 CROSS DRAINS ..................................................................................................................................... 102
6.19 SUB-SURFACE DRAINS ...................................................................................................................... 102
6.20 STRUCTURE .......................................................................................................................................... 102
6.21 ENGINEERING DRAWINGS ................................................................................................................ 103
CHAPTER-VII: ENVIRONMENT STUDY ................................................................................................................. 104
7.1 GENERAL ............................................................................................................................................... 104
7.2 FIELD VISIT BY ENVIRONMENTALIST ........................................................................................... 104
7.3 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN THE FIELD .......................................................................................... 104
TABLE OF CONTENT
7.4 IDENTIFICATION OF BENEFITS AND IMPACTS DUE TO PROPOSED ROAD RELATED
ACTIVITY 104
7.5 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN ...................................................................................... 115
7.6 RELATED LEGISLATIONS .................................................................................................................................. 117
CHAPTER-VIII: DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ..................................................................................................... 120
8.1 ENGINEERING COST ESTIMATE....................................................................................................... 120
8.1.1 CONSTRUCTION COST .................................................................................................................................... 120
8.1.1.1 RATE ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................................ 120
8.1.1.2 QUANTITY ESTIMATE .................................................................................................................................. 121
8.1.1.3 ABSTRACT OF COSTS ................................................................................................................................... 121
8.1.2MAINTENANCE COST ....................................................................................................................................... 121
8.2 BILL OF QUANTITIES.......................................................................................................................................... 137
8.3 PROGRAMME PREPARATION ........................................................................................................................... 137
8.4 PROJECT OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................... 137
TABLE OF CONTENT
LIST OF FIGURE
FIGURE 6 PAVEMENT COMPOSITION AND THICKNESS .................................................................................... 69
LIST OF TABLE
TABLE 1 AXLE LOAD EQUIVALENCY FACTORS AS RECOMMENDED BY AASHTO GUIDE ...................... 63
TABLE 2 VEHICLE DAMAGE FACTOR ACCORDING TO TERRAIN ................................................................... 64
TABLE 3VEHICLE DAMAGE FACTOR ..................................................................................................................... 65
TABLE 4 CALCULATION OF CUMULATIVE NUMBER OF STANDARD AXLES BY IRC METHOD .............. 68
TABLE 5 EQUIVALENT FACTORS FOR DIFFERENT AXLE LOADS ................................................................... 72
TABLE 6VEHICLE DAMAGE FACTOR ..................................................................................................................... 73
TABLE 7 TRAFFIC CLASSES AND EQUIVALENT STANDARD AXLES RANGE ............................................... 74
TABLE 8 SUBGRADE STRENGTH CLASSES AS PER CBR % RANGE ................................................................. 74
TABLE 9CUMULATIVE NUMBER OF STANDARD AXLES FROM ROAD NOTE 31.......................................... 76
TABLE 10 GPS CO-ORDINATE OF MAJOR LOCATIONS ....................................................................................... 83
TABLE 11 VISUAL SURVEY OF TOPOGRAPHY ..................................................................................................... 83
TABLE 12 EXISTING CONDITION OF ROAD ........................................................................................................... 84
TABLE 13 VALUES OF S FOR DIFFERENT RETURN PERIODS ............................................................................ 90
TABLE 14 REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS FOR DIFFERENT RETURN ................................................................. 90
TABLE 17 ALLOWABLE DISCHARGE CAPACITY OF PIPE CULVERTS ............................................................ 97
TABLE 18 ALLOWABLE DISCHARGE CAPACITY OF SLAB CULVERTS - SLOPE 3%..................................... 97
TABLE 19 GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARD ......................................................................................................... 98
TABLE 20 EXTRA WIDENING ADOPTED FOR DESIGN ........................................................................................ 99
TABLE 21 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS ON ENVIRONMENT AND THEIR LEVEL ............................................... 111
TABLE 22SUMMARY OF PROJECT COST .............................................. ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED.
TABLE 23 PROJECT OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE .................................................................................................... 138
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | xv
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION (DPR) OF BANINIYA MAHUKI
TRAFFIC CHOK SADAK, SAPTARI(21KM); UNDER CONTRACT NO: PMEU/337366/073/74 DPR5.”
CHAPTER-I: INTRODUTION
CHAPTER-I: INTRODUTION
1.1. GENERAL
Transportation is one of the important inrfrastructures for overall development of the nation and its
economy. Construction of new road and implementation of scientific transport network plays a vital
for it. Variation in the demographic trend, productivity and other socio-economic factors of
different location prioritize the development of new road alignment, upgradation and well
organized transport network. Considering these facts, study of various new road alignments and
upgradation are being done.
This Report has been prepared and submitted to Government of Nepal (GoN), Ministry of Physical
Infrastructure and Transport, Department of Roads (DoR), Planning, Monitoring and
Evaluation Unit (PMEU), Babarmahal, Kathmandu, (hereinafter referred to as "Client") by Joint
Venture Firm of GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F.hereinafter referred to as "Consultant") as per the
agreement for the DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT
PREPARATION (DPR) OF MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK , DOTI(14 KM); UNDER CONTRACT
NO: PMEU/337159/073/74 DPR-49.”This report is submitted as final report in accordance with the
given Terms of Reference (TOR).
The proposed road connects different places of Dotidistrict. TheroadMauwaNgardahSadakfrom
AmaltukraCH 0+000 and ends at Nagar Daha, Mauwa CH 14+000Km, with Latitude 29°17'9.18"N
to 29°18'43.04"N and Longitude 80°54'26.09"E to 80°54'38.01"E. After the construction of road,
this road will be of 2 Lane standards. This road will play a very important role in up-liftment of
socio-economic condition ofDotidistrict and whole nation.
1.2. LOCATION
The proposed road alignment lies in Dotidistrict, of Far Western Development Region. The road
MauwaNgardahSadak from Amaltukra CH 0+000 and ends at Nagar Daha, Mauwa CH
14+000Km, with Latitude 29°17'9.18"N to 29°18'43.04"N and Longitude 80°54'26.09"E to
80°54'38.01"E.
Significance:
The proposed roads alignmentconnects to Seti Highway.
The main objectives of the study are:
To investigate alignments in terms of socio-economic factors, topography, geology,
environmental aspects, other related factors, etc.
To perform alignment detailed survey and design.
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 16
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION (DPR) OF BANINIYA MAHUKI
TRAFFIC CHOK SADAK, SAPTARI(21KM); UNDER CONTRACT NO: PMEU/337366/073/74 DPR5.”
CHAPTER-I: INTRODUTION
To perform socio-economic and traffic study.
To suggest option of upgrading and design accordingly.
To develop environmental mitigation plan to reduce environmental impacts due to the road
activities.
To prepare detailed project report of the stated road based on sound techno-economical
approach.
The map study was carried out to get clear information of the proposed road alignment before and
after field visit. Hence, the proposed road alignment was plotted on topographical map.
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 17
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
2.1 INTRODUCTION
Doti covers a 2025 km² area with a population of 214,043 in 2015 of the Seti zone in the Far
Western Development Region of Nepal.Its headquater is DipayalSilgadhi.
Table 2.0 V.D.Cs within Influence Area
S. V.D.C Distric S. V.D.C Distric S. V.D.C Distric
N t N t N t
1 BanjaKakani Doti 11 Dhanglagau Doti 21 Jijodamandu Doti
2 Banlek Doti 12 Dhirkamandu Doti 22 Kadamadaun Doti
Barchhen Doti DpayalSilgadhi Doti Kalena Doti
3 13 N.P. 23
4 Basudevi Doti 14 Durgamandu Doti 24 Kalikasthan Doti
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 18
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
2. ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 19
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
Total 105,704
Source: District Development Profile of Nepal 2014/15
2. Forestry
Doti district is rich in terms of forest resources. The vegetation area of Doti is 81539 hectare (54%)
according to the Department of Forest Research and Survey (DoFRS) in 1999. There are various
types of forests in the district. Basically, there are hill Sal forests in river valley areas. There are
mixed hardwood forests in mid hill regions. KhoteSalla (Pine) forests are also found in various hill
slopes. Conifer and Rhododendron forests are found in most high altitude areas between 2000 m to
4000 m.
3. Agriculture Production
The economy of the district is predominantly agro-based. It has high potentials for agriculture and
horticulture, such as oranges, cardamoms etc. The production of major crops, such as cereal, paddy,
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 20
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
Local products are mostly used for their own consumption. Occasionally, they are also sold in the
local markets. Due to the difficult terrain condition and lack of irrigation, the fertility rate of the
area is very low. The local products are not sufficient for their livelihood. Only few households
have sufficient food from their own agriculture land.
Besides agriculture, collection of various types of herbals is also an important occupation of the
people. These herbals are exported to other districts, sometimes to international markets too.
Herbals are the major income source of the people.
3. Settlement Pattern
The settlements in most of the village are scattered. Houses are built with masonry and use of
timber and slate for roofing. Nowadays, CGI sheet are replacing thatch for roofing. But in market
tended settlement concrete building construction is being practiced.
1. Irrigation Facility
The source of irrigation is by gravity and pumping from the natural rivers or ponds or lakes of Doti
district.
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 21
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
1.Electricity
Most of people depend on solar for the source of light in this region. Kerosene, bio gas are other
alternative sources of light here.
Doti District:
Electricity Kerosene Bio gas Solar Others Not stated
% 30.2 10.11 0.36 12.04 46.87 0.42
Source: District development profile of Nepal 2014/15
2. Water Supply
Most of people depend on tap water in this region. Well/kuwa, spout water, rivers, streams are
other sources of water here.
Doti District:
Tap/piped Well/kuwa Spout River/stream Other Not stated
water
% 63.48 8.55 19.92 6.96 0.60 0.41
Source: District development profile of Nepal 2014/15
S.No. Description
Total Population
1 Own Agriculture 78287
2 Wage/Salary Earning 22302
3 Own Non-agricultural 21919
4 Extended Economic 31723
Source: District development profile of Nepal 2014/15
1. Local Products and other Resources
Agriculture production is the main resources of this area. Potato, Sugarcane and Oilseed are the
major resources of income. Agricultural commodities like paddy, wheat, maize, millet, etc. are the
main crops produced in the area. Fruit are also important economic source. Tomato, Jackfruit,
Lemon, Sweet Orange, Apple, Pear, Walnut, Peach, Plum orange etch are the main fruits in this
area. Main vegetables product are Potato, Oil seed. Livestock keeping is another important
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 22
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 23
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 24
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
2.2.4 HEALTH
Health service is one of the important basic facilities required for human beings. The access and
availability of health services depend upon the establishment of these centers in particular areas.
The services of the health posts and hospitals are used in the serious cases. The health service in the
influence area is very poor. There are insufficient health post and Hospital in Dotidistrict. There is
no any well-equipped hospital and sufficient health services in district headquarter also. There is 1
district hospital, 10 health post, 39 sub health post and 236 PHC outreach center, 247 EPI Clinic
and 635 FCHV in Doti district.
2.2.5 EDUCATION
Education status of the district is indicated by the number of educational institutions and student
enrollment. The summary of the educational institutions of the district are as follows:
Table 2.5: Literacy Status of Dolpa districts
S.No. Description Unit Total
1 LiteracyRate Percent 63.04
Primary 26
2 Teacher Student ratio Lower Secondary 30
Secondary 22
Primary 46020
3 Total Admission Lower Secondary 14103
Secondary 5746
4 Teachers Primary 1783
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 25
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
The educational institutes available in the project district are presented in the table below:
Table 2.6: Education Institutes available in the Doti districts
S.No. Educational Institutions Number
1 PrimarySchool 398
2 Lower SecondarySchool 150
3 Secondary School 72
4 Higher SecondarySchool 33
5 Campus 0
6 Training Center 0
Source: District Profile of Nepal2012
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 26
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
The proposed project will connect Seti Highway and hence it will provide easier access to people to
social services, and market access for local product like buck wheat, maize, wheat, potato, barley,
dairy production.
Traffic data plays vital role for any transport project. The headquarters at these districts will be
connected with the trade route by 2 Lane for better transportation network. The people from the Far
Western region of Nepal will be directly benefitted from this project. Further, the project road will
connectSeti Highway connecting the East West Highway with Indo Nepal Boarder which is of
national importance.
On the basis of above traffic zones the existing traffic flow and traffic growth rate can be taken as
fundamental for the traffic forecast. At present no heavy vehicle ply on the road at this section, only
few jeeps, similarly buses, trucks and few tractors play on the road in daily basis. To determine the
present traffic volume some traffic data are assumed by the consultant for the design of pavement,
considering the future requirement of road project. These data are presented by Department of Road
in their WEBSITE for the design purpose only tandem vehicle is considered like Bus, Truck,
Motorcycles,etc are existing type of traffic on the route of the proposed alignment.
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 27
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 28
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 29
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
GROWTH RATE
Socio-economic Data
Major socio-economic parameters that influence traffic growth estimation are State income (GDP),
population and per capita share. As, Nepal’s economy is mainly dominated by the primary sector,
growth in GDP is considered to be single most influencing indicator of the transport demand.
Growth in population and per capita income have most influence on passenger travel demand,
however, combined effect of population and per capita income growth nearly equates to the growth
in GDP.
Past analysis of GDP shows a growth of varies year by year, now following, political
reorganization towards a stable democratic government, it can very well be anticipated that
economy of Nepal would bounce back to the path of high sustainable growth. Hence an average
annual growth of 5% is considered during the project life.
Population growth rate over last three decades varies between 2.1 to 2.74% per annum. During last
decade, it was 1.48% but for the coming decade, population growth can very well be interpreted in
the range closer to 2.3% to 2.4% per annum.
In view of the above analysis, discussions on economic parameters and conclusion on thereof,
traffic growth rates can be established as:
For Freight vehicles 7.0%
Adopted Growth Rate
The growth rates worked out from socio-economic parameters have been compared with that from
Departmental Policy Document of Nepal to arrive at rational traffic projections. Higher population
growth would call for higher passenger movement demand than in average sector demand. On
account of low per capita income, thrust of passenger demand shall be towards low cost option like
bus and low cost vehicle option of two/three wheeler. Little higher freight transport demand is
considered on account of increase in cross border movement. The vehicle growth rate can be taken
as 6.0% for all vehicles.
Base year traffic flow
The base year traffic flow is estimated by Average Daily Traffic (ADT) currently using the Seti
Highway route, classified into the vehicle categories of truck, bus and motorcycle. The ADT is
defined as the average number of traffic summed for both directions. Further ADT is multiplied by
the seasonal factors 0.97 to convert it into Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT). Base year traffic
flow can be expressed by using a single number i.e. Passenger Car Unit.
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 30
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
In this case the project will be a new road (because existing track is single lane and in poor
condition) and it will allow access of goods and services from Nagar Daha, Mauwa to
DipayalSilgadhi and vice versa. In addition the road helps in economic growth of the country as it
serves as access roadbetween Nagar Daha, Mauwa to DipayalSilgadhi so generated traffic has been
assumed as 300% of normal traffic.
A simple network flow diagram has been drawn to assess diverted traffic in which we can see that
AADT from Seti Highway to Nagar Daha is 203 as traffic from Seti Highway will be diverted to
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 31
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
SUMMARY SHEET:
Date Start Time Motorized Vehicle Animals
(Hrs)
Light Four Wheel Motor Mules Equivalent Remarks
Truck Drive (Bus) Cycle Trucks
Sub Total Day 1 3 14 38 10 1
3
Sub Total Day 2 4 16 37 10 1
3
Sub Total Day 3 3 15 39 11 1
3
Grand Total 9 45 114
Average Daily Traffic 3 16 38 Base Year Traffic Flow in year 2074
(ADT) B.S
Year Estimated Project Period 3 years Unit Adopt traffic
2075 4 17 40 CVPD growth rate in
2076 5 19 43 CVPD first year as
2077 6 21 46 CVPD 5% and after
wards as 6 %
After Project completion in year 2077 B.S Remarks
Normal Traffic 6 21 46
Generated Traffic 18 63 138 In this case the project will be a new
road (because existing track is single
lane and in poor condition) and it will
allow access of goods and services
from Nagar Daha, Mauwa to
DipayalSilgadhiand vice versa. In
addition the road helps in economic
growth of the country as it serves as
access road between Nagar Daha,
Mauwa to DipayalSilgadhigenerated
traffic has been assumed as 300 % of
normal traffic.
Diverted Traffic 16 61 126 A simple network flow diagram has
been drawn to assess diverted traffic in
which we can see that AADT from Seti
Highway to Nagar Daha is 1260 as
traffic from Seti Highway will be
diverted to this road . At 6% growth
rate from 2069/70 to 2077/78 in 8 years
and assuming 30% of diverted traffic, it
becomes 203 and then is divided
proportionately.
Total ADT in CVPD 40 225 750
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 32
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 33
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 34
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 35
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 36
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
4
Axle load , kgf
Single axle dual wheel EF
8160 kgf (80kN )
4
Axle load , kgf
Tandem axle dual wheel EF
14968 kgf (146.8kN )
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 38
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 39
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
DETAIL DESIGN CALCULATION AS PER DOR PAVEMENT DESIGN GUIDELINE METHOD (FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT)
Table 20 Calculation of Cumulative Number of Standard Axles by DoR Method.
2077
2074 Traffic AADT 2077
Lane Standard Cummulative
Traffic Growth Forecast with VDF
S.N. Vehicle Type A*F Distribution A*F*D Axles (N) for Standards of Remarks
Count (Both Rate 6% with 6% seasonal (F)
Factor (D) 15 year Axel
Direction) Growth factor 0.97
Rate
2 Four Wheel Drive Bus 145 0.06 297.75 288.82 0.5 144.41 0.75 108.30 533690.23
Cummulative Number of Standard Axles for design period (N) 0.83 msa
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 40
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 41
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
Fig 5.1: DCP-CBR relationships (Oversees Road Note 31, 4th edition, 1993)
Table 21: Correlation to find CBR from DCP test
Author Correlation Field or Material used
Laboratory based
study
Kleyn (1975) log CBR 2.62 1.27(log PI ) Laboratory unknown
Harison (1987) log CBR 2.56 1.16(log PI ) Laboratory Cohesive
Harison (1987) log CBR 3.03 1.51(log PI ) Laboratory Granular
Livneh et al. (1994) log CBR 2.46 1.12(log PI ) Field and laboratory Granular and
cohesive
Ese et al. (1994) log CBR 2.44 1.07(log PI ) Field and laboratory ABC*
NCDOT (1998) log CBR 2.6 1.07(log PI ) Field and laboratory ABC* and
cohesive
Coonse (1999) log CBR 2.53 1.14(log PI ) Laboratory Piedomont
residual soil
Gabr (2000) log CBR 1.4 0.55(log PI ) Field and laboratory ABC*
*Aggregate base course
In this report, the CBR has been evaluated using Kleyn and Van Heerden.
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 42
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
0 28 - - -
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 43
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
0 10 - - -
10 51 20 41.00 4.10
15 85 34 75.00 5.00
0 0 - - -
10 63 31 63.00 6.30
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 44
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
0 13 - - -
10 35 12 22.00 2.20
15 40 5 27.00 1.80
20 45 5 32.00 1.60
25 55 10 42.00 1.68
1+500
30 58 3 45.00 1.50
35 67 9 54.00 1.54
40 73 6 60.00 1.50
45 85 12 72.00 1.60
50 97 12 84.00 1.68
0 28 - - -
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 45
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
10 81 32 66.00 6.60
0 20 - - -
10 77 19 57.00 5.70
15 89 12 69.00 4.60
3+000
20 117 28 97.00 4.85
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 46
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
0 0 - - -
0 0 - - -
10 62 27 62.00 6.20
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 47
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
0 10 - - -
0 10 - - -
10 45 22 35.00 3.50
15 76 31 66.00 4.40
0 10 - - -
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 48
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
0 13 - - -
10 33 9 20.00 2.00
15 39 6 26.00 1.73
20 47 8 34.00 1.70
25 53 6 40.00 1.60
6+000
30 59 6 46.00 1.53
35 68 9 55.00 1.57
40 77 9 64.00 1.60
45 83 6 70.00 1.56
50 96 13 83.00 1.66
0 15 - - -
10 60 15 45.00 4.50
15 78 18 63.00 4.20
20 95 17 80.00 4.00
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 49
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
0 28 - - -
0 20 - - -
10 73 30 53.00 5.30
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 50
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
0 10 - - -
10 52 20 42.00 4.20
15 87 35 77.00 5.13
0 5 - - -
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 51
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
0 15 - - -
10 80 30 65.00 6.50
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 52
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
0 23 - - -
10 85 33 62.00 6.20
0 5 - - -
10 75 30 70.00 7.00
10+500 0 20 - - -
55 35 7.00 7.56 35.62
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 53
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
10 76 21 56 5.60
15 90 14 70 4.67
20 115 25 95 4.75
0 5 - - -
10 70 25 65.00 6.50
15 90 20 85.00 5.67
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 54
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
0 7 - - -
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 55
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
0 20 - - -
10 111 30 91 9.10
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 56
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
0 20 - - -
10 70 20 50.00 5.00
5 45 25 25 5 4.89 56.42
13+500
10 61 16 41 4
15 77 16 57 4
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 57
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
25 106 13 86 3
30 120 14 100 3
35 132 12 112 3
40 156 24 136 3
45 170 14 150 3
50 193 23 173 3
55 217 24 197 4
60 255 38 235 4
65 292 37 272 4
70 343 51 323 5
75 404 61 384 5
80 475 71 455 6
0 5 - - -
10 70 25 65.00 6.50
15 90 20 85.00 5.67
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 58
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
Note:The following DCP tests have been carried out for 1 m of depth. Since, the proposed road has
more than 15 m of cut in some places, so the DCP test could not be conducted at these depths.
Hence, the adopted CBR value is taken as 10% in average.
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 59
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
D50Coarse layer
(b) 25
D50Fine layer
BASE COURSE
Unbound granular bases which comprise conventional Graded Crushed Stone and Water Bound
Macadam (WBM) base shall be provided as per the Standard Specification (Clause 1202 and
1203). Materials used in the base must satisfy the grading and physical requirements in the
Standard Specification. The thickness of granular base is 200 mm.
BITUMINOUS SURFACING
Bituminous surfacing shall consist of either a wearing course or a binder course with a wearing
course depending upon the traffic to be carried. Double Base Surface Dressing can be used for
bituminous wearing course as per standard specification (Section 1300). Bituminous Surfacing 50
mm is calculated.
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 60
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
1. Design is based on the performance of existing designs and using analytical approach,
simple design charts and a catalogue of pavement designs added in the code.
2. The pavement designs are given for subgrade CBR values ranging from 2% to 10% and
design traffic ranging from 1 msa to 150 msa,
3. Using the following simple input parameters, appropriate designs could be chosen for the
given traffic and soil strength.
Design Traffic in terms of cumulative number of standard axles.
CBR value of subgrade
DESIGN TRAFFIC
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 61
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
If adequate data is not available, it is recommended that an average annual growth rate of 7% may
be adopted.
VEHICLE DAMAGE FACTOR
The vehicle damage factor (VDF) is a multiplier for converting the number of commercial vehicles
of different axle loads and axle configuration to the number of standard axle-load repetitions. It is
defined as equivalent number of standard axles per commercial vehicle. The axle load equivalency
factors are used to convert different axle load repetitions into equivalent standard axle load
repetitions. The axle load equivalency factors recommended in the AASHTO guide are given in
table below. They are used for converting different axle load repetitions into equivalent standard
axle load repetitions.
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 62
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 63
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
When sufficient information on axle loads is not available and the project size does not warrant
conducting an axle load survey, the indicative values of vehicle damage factor as given in table
below may be used.
Where sufficient information on axle load is not available and project size does not warrant
conducting an axle load survey, the indicative values of Vehicle damage factor (VDF) may be used
as given in the table below. The Vehicle Damage factor (VDF) is the multiplier to convert the
number of commercial vehicles of different axle loads and axle configuration to the number of
standard axle load repetitions. It is defined as equivalent number of standard axle per commercial
vehicle. The VDF varies with the vehicle axle configuration, axle loading, and terrain type and
from region to region. The VDF is arrived at axle load surveys on typical sections so as to cover
various influencing factors, such as traffic mix, mode of transportation, commodities carried, time
of the year, terrain, road conditions and degree of enforcement.
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 64
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
5 Bus 0.35
6 Tractors 1.0
In case the class mark of the axle load survey does not match with the above axle loads, 4 th Power
Law may be used for converting axle loads into equivalent standard axle loads using the following
formula.
SINGLE AXLE LOAD
Equivalency Factor = (axle load in kg/8160)4
TANDEM AXLE LOAD
Equivalency Factor = (axle load in kg/14968)4
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION
A realistic assessment of distribution of commercial traffic by direction and by lane is necessary as
it directly affects the total equivalent standard axle load application used in the design. Until
reliable data is available, the following distribution may be assumed.
a) Single lane roads: Traffic tends to be more channelized on single lane roads than two-lane
roads and to allow for this concentration of wheel load repetitions, the design should be
based on total number of commercial vehicles in both direction.
b) Two-lane single carriage roads/ Intermediate lane roads: The design should be based on
75 percent of the total number of commercial vehicles in both directions.
c) Four-lane single carriageway roads: The design should be based on 40 percent of the total
number of commercial vehicles in both directions.
d) Dual carriageway roads: The design of dual two lane carriageway roads should be based
on 75 percent of the number of commercial vehicles in each direction. For dual three-lane
carriageway and dual four lane carriageway, the distribution factor will be 60 percent and
45 percent respectively.
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 65
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 66
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 67
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
207
2077
4
Traffi Lan
Traf AADT
c e
fic 2077
Growt Forec Dist Cummula
Cou with Standar
S. Vehic h ast VDF ribu tive Remar
Type nt season A*F A*F*D d Axles
N. le Rate with (F) tion Standard ks
(Bot al (N) for
6% 6% Fact s of Axel
h factor 15 year
Growt or
Dire 0.97
h (D)
ctio
Rate
n)
Truck 294449.
1 Light 40 0.06 47.64 46.21 1 46.21 0.75 34.65
78
Four
828141
Whee 297.7 144.4 108.3
2 Bus 145 0.06 288.82 0.5 0.75
l 5 1 0 533690.
Drive 23
190.6 142.9
Total
2 5
Cummulative Number of Standard Axles for design period (N) 828141 esa
Cummulative Number of Standard Axles for design period (N) 0.83 msa
Cumulative Number of Standard Axles for design period is calculated as 0.83msa which lies
between 1 to 10 msa, CBR Value is calculated as 10%
Pavement design for this project according IRC Method of Pavement Design Guideline is Plate I –
Recommended Design for Traffic Range 1 -10 msa for CBR Value 10%. According to that Plate I,
the total pavement thickness is 350 mm with Granular Base 200 mm and Granular Sub-base 150
mm and Surface course 14 mm.
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 68
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 69
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
TRAFFIC
The deterioration of paved roads caused by traffic results from both the magnitude of the individual
wheel loads and the number of times these loads are applied. For pavement design purposes, it is
necessary to consider not only the total number of vehicles that will use the road but also the wheel
loads (or for convenience, the axle loads) of these vehicles. The loads imposed by private cars do
not contribute significantly to the structural damage. For the purposes of structural design, cars and
similar sized vehicles can be ignored and only the total number and the axle loading of the heavy
vehicles that will use the road during its design life need to be considered in this context, heavy
vehicles are defined as those having a laden weight of 3000 kg or more.
DESIGN LIFE
For most road projects an economic analysis period of between 10 and 20 years from the date of
opening is appropriate. Design life doesn’t mean at the end of the period the pavement will be
completely worn out and in need of reconstruction. It means towards the end of the period the
pavement will need to be strengthened so that it can continue to carry traffic satisfactorily for a
further period.
ESTIMATING TRAFFIC FLOWS
In order to determine the total traffic over the design life of the road, the first step is to estimate
baseline traffic flows. The estimate should be Annual Average Daily Traffic currently using the
route. The AADT is defined as the total annual traffic summed for both directions and divided by
365. For long projects, large differences in traffic along the road may make it necessary to estimate
the flow at several locations. It should be noted that for structural design purposes the traffic
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 70
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
TRAFFIC COUNTS
The counts are for seven consecutive days. The counts on some of the days are for a full 24 hours,
some days 16-hour counts should be sufficient. These should be grossed upto 24-hour values in the
same proportion as the 16-hour/24 hour split on those days when full 24 hours counts have been
taken. Counts are avoided at times when travel activity is abnormal for short period. If possible 7-
day counts should be repeated several times throughout the year.
TRAFFIC FORECASTING
An extent of future traffic depends on many factors such as economic, land-use and demographic
factors. Therefore, traffic forecasting is an uncertain process. In a developing economy the problem
becomes more difficult because such economies are often very sensitive to the world prices of just
one or two commodities. In order to forecast traffic growth it is necessary to separate traffic into the
following three categories.
a) Normal Traffic
Traffic which will pass along the existing road or track even if no any new pavement is provided.
The commonest method of forecasting normal traffic is to extrapolate time series data on traffic
levels and assume that growth will either remain constant in absolute terms i.e. a fixed number of
vehicles per year (a linear extrapolation), or constant in relative terms i.e. a fixed percentage
increase.
b) Diverted Traffic
Traffic that changes from another route (or mode of transport) to the project road because of the
improved pavement, but still travels between the same origin and destination. Where parallel routes
exist, traffic will usually travel on the quickest route although this may not necessarily be the
shortest. Thus, surfacing an existing road may divert traffic from a parallel and shorter route
because higher speeds are possible on the surface road. Origin and destination surveys should be
carried out to provide data on the traffic diversions likely to arise. Diverted traffic is normally
assumed to grow at the same rate as traffic on the road from it is diverted.
c) Generated Traffic
Additional traffic which occurs in response to the provision or improvement of the road. Generated
traffic arises either because a journey becomes more attractive by virtue of a cost or time reduction
or because of the increased developments that is brought about by the road investment. Generated
traffic is difficult to forecast accurately and can be easily overestimated. It is only likely to be
significant in those cases where the road investment brings about large reductions in transport
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 71
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 72
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
5 Bus 0.35
6 Tractors 1.0
TRAFFIC CLASSES
Following given below table shows various traffic classes as per equivalent standard axles
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 73
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
1 T1 < 0.3
2 T2 0.3 – 0.7
3 T3 0.7 – 1.5
4 T4 1.5 – 3.0
5 T5 3.0 – 6.0
6 T6 6.0 – 10.0
7 T7 10.0 – 17.0
8 T8 17.0 – 30.0
1 S1 <2
2 S2 3-4
3 S3 5-7
4 S4 8 - 14
5 S5 15 - 29
6 S6 > 30
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 74
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 75
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
DESIGN CALCULATION OF DESIGN TRAFFIC & CUMMULATIVE NUMBER OF STANDARD AXLES AS PER TRL OVERSEAS
ROAD NOTE 31
Table 9Cumulative Number of Standard Axles from Road Note 31
2077
2074 Traffic AADT 2077
Lane Standard Cummulative
Traffic Growth Forecast with VDF
S.N. Vehicle Type A*F Distribution A*F*D Axles (N) for Standards of Remarks
Count (Both Rate 6% with 6% seasonal (F)
Factor (D) 15 year Axel
Direction) Growth factor 0.97
Rate
2 Four Wheel Drive Bus 145 0.06 297.75 288.82 0.5 144.41 0.75 108.30 533690.23
Cummulative Number of Standard Axles for design period (N) 0.83 msa
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 76
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
Cumulative Number of Standard Axles for design period is calculated as 0.83msa.85 percent maximum CBR Value is calculated as 10%.
According to Road Note 31, for 0.83msa, Traffic Class T3 is considered and Subgrade Strength Class as S3with CBR value 10% which lies between
8and14CBR%. Therefore according to structural catalogue of Road Note 31, the combination is T3 and S4, so the total pavement thickness from chart is
350mm with Granular Base Coarse 200 mm, Granular Sub-Base Coarse 150 mm and Surface course 14mm.
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 77
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 78
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 79
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 80
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 81
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 82
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
CHAPTER-VI: DESIGN AND DRAWINGS
5.1 GENERAL
Following field surveys and investigations have been carried out for the project roads to determine
the appropriate inputs for design and project preparation.
1. Road Inventory Survey
2. Construction Material Survey
3. Geological and Geo-technical Survey
4. Hydrological and Meteorological Survey
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 83
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
CHAPTER-VI: DESIGN AND DRAWINGS
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 84
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
CHAPTER-VI: DESIGN AND DRAWINGS
Investigation of existing road materials on sites.
As a result of the elevation differences, Doti has four different types of climate: tropical up to 1,200
m where temperature increase more than 440 Celsius, subtropical from 1,200-2,100 m, Temperate
above 2,100-3300m and Alpine above 3300m . The annual rainfall is about 1,347 mm and
temperature varies from 0.2 ºC to 44ºC. Subsistence agriculture farming, mainly small scale
livestock is the main source of occupation and livelihood of the majority of the population, with
71.42% of the population active in this sector. Due to low level of agricultural production, the
majority of the households face acute food shortages for a large part of the year.
According to the National Census 2011, the total population of Dotiis 211,750 comprising 114,498
female (54.04%) and 97,252 male (45.93%) residing in 41,440 households. Doti has an average
population density of around 105 people per square km. The average family size is 4.99. The
average life expectancy is 53 years (Female is 55 and 50 years). The average literacy rate is about
59.4% (45.66% female and 76.65% male). Doti has a multi ethnic composition with Chhetri,
Thakuri, Kami, Damai, Brahman, Sarki, Sanyashi, Magar, Newar and others. The common
language is Nepali (98.78%).
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 85
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
CHAPTER-VI: DESIGN AND DRAWINGS
There are numerous district and village roads. From the field study, it has been observed that most
of them are in fair weather condition. Most of these roads have been constructed using excavator
without proper planning and engineering design. The study team has found Doti in a relatively
better transport situation. Doti has an easy surface transport connection with major market and
commercial cities namely Dadeldhura and Dhangdhi. However, most of the rural roads are in poor
condition and need to be improved /upgraded for safe and reliable journey. Doti has access to the
Mahakali Highway (Attariya-Dadeldhura-Darchula). A feeder road between the Dadeldhura
(Syaule) and Achham (Mangalsen) is recently upgraded to bituminous standard by DoR.
Geologically, Doti district falls in Subtropical region. There we can find fine grained, hard, grey
sand stones interbedded with purple and chocolate colouredshales, nodular maroon clays and
pseudo conglomerates.
Geologically, the Siwalik Hills belong to the tertiary deposits of the outer Himalayas. They are
chiefly composed of sandstone and conglomerate rock formations, which are the solidified detritus
of the great mountain range to their north, but often poorly consolidated. The
remnant magnetization of siltstones and sandstones suggests a depositional age of 16-5.2 million
years with Karnali River exposing the oldest part of the Siwalik Hills in Nepal.
They are the southernmost and geologically youngest east-west mountain chain of the Himalayas.
They have many sub-ranges and extend west from Arunachal Pradesh through Bhutan to West
Bengal, and further westward through Nepal and Uttarakhand, continuing into Himachal
Pradesh and Kashmir. The hills are cut through at wide intervals by numerous large rivers flowing
south from the Himalayas.
They are bounded on the south by a fault system called the Main Frontal Thrust, with steeper slopes
on that side. Below this, the coarse alluvial Bhabar zone makes the transition to the nearly level
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 86
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
CHAPTER-VI: DESIGN AND DRAWINGS
plains. Rainfall, especially during the summer monsoon, percolates into the bhabar, then is forced
to the surface by finer alluvial layers below it in a zone of springs and marshes along the northern
edge of the Terai or plains.
North of the Siwalik Hills the 1,500-3,000 meter Lesser Himalayas also known as the Mahabharat
Range rise steeply along fault lines. In many places the two ranges are adjacent but in other places
structural valleys 10–20 km wide separate them.
Bus lay bys are found to be suitable near the settlement area having dense population. The possible
chainages for providing bus lay bys are as follows:-
0+100
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 87
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
CHAPTER-VI: DESIGN AND DRAWINGS
7+200
10+100
14+000
Proper placement of signpost and signal along alignment of road is very important in order to
prevent accident and make people aware of any danger ahead. Specially, signposts and signals are
provided near sharp curves, approach section of bridge, near settlement area etc. The possible
chainages for providing signposts are:-
1+000
2+000
2+800
3+000
3+300
5+800
6+400
7+000
9+500
10+000
10+400
10+900
11+200
11+500
12+000
12+300
12+400
13+000
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 88
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
CHAPTER-VI: DESIGN AND DRAWINGS
Identification of erosion prone areas during field visit
Verification of drainage locations with survey, inventory and field visit data
Delineation of watershed boundary and determination of drainage area from topographical
maps
Frequency analysis of relevant stream flow data
Frequency analysis of maximum daily rainfall at relevant stations
Establishment of IDF (Intensity-Duration-Frequency) curves for different road sections
Establishment of catchments and channel characteristics (time of concentration and runoff
coefficient)
Estimation of flood flows for adopted return periods by different methods
Comparison and selection of design discharge for cross and side drains
Design of cross and side drains.
HYDROLOGY
General Introduction
Detailed hydrological study at the proposed river crossing has been carried out to find out the
hydrological design parameters required for the design of cross drainage structures. The catchment
area is estimated from topographical map and ARCGIS 9.3. The high flood discharge was
estimated for the return periods of 100 years.
Catchment Characteristics
The coordinate of the outlet point of the catchment in the river crossing is taken from field. The
catchment is delineated from ARCGIS 9.3 and the catchment area at the outlet point is estimated.
The length of stream from its head to outlet point is determined.
Study Approach
Although the rainfall measuring stations in Nepal are established nearly during sixties the rainfall
data is not continuously available. Since short period of the data will not provide the better result
for the frequency analysis, which requires minimum 30 years data. Hence, to solve the problem the
appropriate rainfall data are collected.
Estimation of peak flow
The high flood discharge is estimated by using different approaches. They are as follows:
Water and Energy Commission Secretariat (WECS) Approach
The Water and Energy Commission Secretariat (WECS) has developed an approach to estimate the
flood flows in any ungauged catchment area below 3000 m elevation. The 2 year (Q2) and 100 year
(Q100) return period floods are given by:
Q2 = 1.8767 x (area below 3000 m + 1) 0.8783
Q100 = 14.63 x (area below 3000 m + 1) 0.7342
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 89
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
CHAPTER-VI: DESIGN AND DRAWINGS
The flood for any return period of R years is given by:
𝑄𝑅 = 𝑒 (𝑙𝑛𝑄2 +𝑠𝜎)
Where, s = standardized normal variable for a particular return period, R
𝑄100
𝜎 = ln ( ) /2.326
𝑄2
Dicken's Method
The flood flows for T years of return period can be estimated by Dicken's method as;
𝑄𝑇 = 𝐶𝑇 𝐴3/4
Where, 𝐶𝑇 = 2.342 log(0.6𝑇) 𝑙𝑜𝑔 (1185⁄𝑃) + 4
𝑎+6
𝑃 = (𝐴+𝑎) ∗ 100
Return Period K n
5 1.6762 0.966
20 3.2303 0.9281
50 4.609 0.9071
100 5.9865 0.8888
HFL calculation
Rating curve of the bridge site is developed with the slope area method. The river profile and cross
sections of the river are surveyed during the field study. The resulting water level for the flood is
computed.
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 90
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
CHAPTER-VI: DESIGN AND DRAWINGS
Waterway width
Linear waterway is defined as width of waterway between the extreme edges of water surface at
H.F.L. measured at right angles to the axis line. Likewise, effective linear waterway is the total
width of the waterway of the bridge at H.F.L. minus effective width of obstruction. This waterway
width can be determined by two methods.
Lacey’s Formula,
Linear waterway 𝑊 = 4.75√𝑄
Where, Q = Flood discharge
Kellerhals's Formula,
Linear waterway 𝑊 = 3.26√𝑄
Where, Q = Flood discharge
In case of hill region, River bed consist of gravel and boulders, thus the waterway adopted by
Kellerhal’s method and seems to be reasonable in this type of river.
Side Drain and Cross Drainage Design
The cross-drainages are constructed in the form of Bridges, Culverts, Floodways and Side Drain.
The choice of the structures depends on the design discharge, anticipated sediment loads,
configuration of flow, foundation condition, ease of construction and cost of structures. Out of the
many types of the culverts, the choice depends on the local topography, sediment load, availability
of material and costs. Mainly masonry slab culverts, concrete pipe culverts, concrete box culverts
and concrete or masonry floodways are considered for the design of the cross drainages.
The hydrological data are obtained from the Hydrology Chapter of this report. The data are
precisely derived and the cross drainage structures and side drains are designed based on these data.
The hydrology report gives the data of flood estimation derived using the different Method. The
road passes through hilly terrain with variations in altitude along the alignment. As the road lies
mountain range there is little chance of significant variation in the rain intensity. Therefore, there
will hardly be any variation in the rainfall intensity from one place to the other along the road as
shown in the hydrology table above. Catchment area is the only variable factor for the calculation
of the discharge for each of the streams or watercourses.
As shown in the hydrology report, each natural drain or gully has different catchment area thus,
having different flood discharges. This will require many sizes of cross drains in the road. It is not
practicable to design cross drain for each of these gullies. It is not only practicable but also not
economical to provide cross drain of many sizes. Therefore, the discharges from the hydrology
report are grouped together. The maximum value of discharge of each group shall be taken for
design purpose.
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 91
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
CHAPTER-VI: DESIGN AND DRAWINGS
Table no. 3.1 River Morphology(List of River and Kholshi crossing)
S. NAME CHAINAG CATCHMEN DISCHARGE LINEAR
N E(KM) T AREA WECS DICKEN'S MHSP WATERW
(sq. km) Method Method Method AY
(m3/s) (m3/s) (m3/s) (m)
1. Stream 2+000 1.88 31.83 10.23 10.49 26.8
Culverts are mainly constructed at the place of existing natural gullies. Apart from the natural
gullies, it must be provided at the place where the road has valley curve along its alignment. The
location of the culvert should be so chosen that it should have minimum interference with the
natural course of flow. The invert level of the culverts should be maintained at the same level as
that of the stream bed.
For the seasonal water ways carrying flood water during monsoon season, causeways could be
designed as cross drains. Causeways are proposed at the places where the location is appropriate for
it and unsuitable for other types of culverts.
The road crosses a number of perennial and non-perennial rives. The table no. 3.1 shows list of
rivers along the road alignment.
RAINFALL DATA
Almost 80% of rainfall occurs during the monsoon, which starts around the middle of June and
continues until the end of August. Rainfall may also occur in the pre-monsoon (April - May), post
monsoon (September - October), and in winter. The pre monsoon and post monsoon rains are local
events causing intense rainfall of short duration usually in the late afternoon or evening
accompanied by thunderstorm. Winter rains between December and March are caused by the
westerly disturbances.
Even during the monsoon, rainfall in the basin is not uniform. There is marked spatial and temporal
rainfall variation in the valley as a whole due to orthographic and other effects.
Table:4.1 Precipitation Records (mm) of Dipayal
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May June Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1996 44.0 0.0 44.5 57.5 151.8 314.3 565.3 311.1 464.0 58.0 0.0 0.0
1997 28.0 14.0 13.0 78.2 160.3 167.7 319.6 532.0 498.2 66.2 0.0 45.5
1998 0.0 15.5 87.8 156.8 165.9 264.1 472.0 743.5 308.5 204.6 13.0 0.0
1999 9.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 436.5 288.3 656.4 457.2 230.3 182.0 16.5 0.0
2000 6.5 11.5 6.0 112.5 265.5 270.3 398.4 370.1 212.4 90.4 14.0 DNA
2001 DNA 108.3 24.0 127.6 168.4 288.2 406.2 543.4 434.4 93.8 0.0 DNA
2002 7.0 4.4 38.0 172.4 173.3 303.4 468.3 286.0 186.3 36.7 0.0 0.0
2003 26.9 40.6 86.6 89.7 68.0 595.1 406.2 182.7 425.3 80.2 0.0 24.0
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 92
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
CHAPTER-VI: DESIGN AND DRAWINGS
2004 11.4 3.0 30.6 160.7 168.8 301.4 396.8 285.6 412.3 70.1 0.0 0.0
2005 29.4 0.0 35.6 70.8 124.4 359.1 98.6 219.7 156.0 40.0 0.0 9.0
Source: Department of Metrology
Intensity-duration-frequency relation
From the available rainfall data the mean and the standard deviation of the annual series of
Maximum 24- hour rainfall were obtained. These 24 –hour rainfall depths are converted into 2-
hour intensity and the intensity of shorter duration are obtained using the formula as given below:
Frequency analysis based on Extreme Value type I (EVI) distribution
KT = -√6 / π {0.5772+ ln[ln (T/(T-1))]}
XT = X- + KT σ
Where,
KT = Frequency factor
XT = 24- hour rainfall of T year frequency
Ih,T = Rainfall intensity of h hour duration and T year frequency ( Return period )
Time Concentration
Time concentration for a small drainage basin would be equal to the longest combination of
overland flow time called inlet time (T0) and channel flow time (Tf) that exists anywhere within the
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 93
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
CHAPTER-VI: DESIGN AND DRAWINGS
basin. Channel flow time is generally taken as the length of the longest channel divided by the
average flow velocity in the channel when water depth is nearly equal to depth of the channel. The
overland flow time or the inlet time is computed using Kirpich formula:
TC = 57 (L3/ H) 0.385
Where,
TC = Time of concentration in minute
L = Length of the longest watercourse, in Km
H= Difference in the elevation of the catchments, m
The longest of the longest watercourse can be determined on the basis of the relationship developed
and recommended by McDonald and Partners (1982) for the Nepali catchments
L = 1.407 A0.547
Where,
L= Length of the longest watercourse, in Km
A= Area of the catchments (km2)
Run off coefficient- will be determined later after the alignment of road will be finalized.
Calculation of Design Discharge
Rational Method
Flood flows may be estimated from rational formulae that take into account the intensity,
distribution and duration of rainfall as well as the area, shape, slope, permeability and initial
wetness of the basin. The following formulae are used to calculate the flood discharge:
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 94
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
CHAPTER-VI: DESIGN AND DRAWINGS
Hydraulic Design of Side Drains and Cross Drains
For the design of the cross drainages over watercourses, and the road side drains, discharge for
return period of 25 and 10 years is taken into consideration. The hydrological study has determined
the discharges, of 25 and 10 years return period, for all significant watercourses along the road.
Other streams or watercourse also need to be bridged to allow the water to flow through even if the
discharge is insignificant. The result of the discharges is given in hydrology report. The objective
of the hydraulic design is to determine the size of the culvert over the watercourse, so that the
estimated discharge flow freely through it.
To determine the size of the pipe, slab or box culverts and the side drains, to allow the design
discharge of a stream to flow freely through it, Manning’s formula is used. For this purpose
allowable discharge capacity of different sized culverts and side drains are determined using the
formula.
V = 1/n*R2/3 *S1/2
Where,
V = velocity in m/sec
n = coefficient of surface roughness which depends in the roughness of the surfaces. It is generally
taken as 0.018 for slab culverts having concrete bottom slab and rubble masonry side walls and it is
0.016 for culverts having all sides of formed concrete. For pipe culverts it could be taken as that for
trowel finished concrete which has a value for n as 0.014 and it is 0.017 for random stone masonry
in cement mortar.
= Aw/Pw
Pw = Wetted Perimeter in m
S = Slope of energy slope of channel, which is roughly taken as slope of culvert bed and drain
in %
Q = V*Aw
Where
Q = discharge in m3/s
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 95
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
CHAPTER-VI: DESIGN AND DRAWINGS
For calculating the discharge capacity of the open or covered trapezoidal, rectangular and right
triangular or tick drains, same formula as above is applied.
Using the above formula, allowable discharge capacity of the standard sized pipe, slab and box
culverts and different section of road side drain with different slopes, are determined and given in
tables below. Generally, a free board of 0.6m is provided for the slab and box culverts while
determining the discharge capacity. The size of the slab or box culverts and its free board depends
in the topography of the stream, design profile of road, expected sedimentation load, debris flow
and location of the culverts such as culverts in valleys, mid-hills and the ridges.
The slope of the culvert bed is limited to maximum of 3% because slopes exceeding this value may
generate excess velocity of flow to cause erosion at the outlets, requiring additional erosion control
measures. For design purpose, the bed slope considered is 3% and resulting allowable discharges
are taken for all types of culverts.
However, the road side drain slopes are determined by road profile gradient. Therefore, the drains
will have the same slope as the road gradient. The steeper slopes of the drain, causes the water to
flow in higher velocity than the shallower slopes. Higher the velocity of the flow higher will be the
discharge capacity of the drain and higher the probability of erosion. Therefore, to counter erosion,
concrete is recommended as the bedding of side drains.
The capacity of 600mm, 900mm and 1200 mm diameter pipes is calculate using the Manning’s
formula. For the calculation of the discharge capacity of the pipes, Manning’s formula is used. The
roughness “n” for concrete pipes is taken as 0.014. The length of the pipe culverts is taken as
minimum 12.0 meters and the slope as 3%. The allowable free flow discharge capacity of the three
types of pipes culverts are given in table given below.
The maximum allowable discharge of masonry slab culverts and reinforced concrete box culverts
of different sizes with bed slope of 3% are given in table given below.
For the design of the road side drains, Manning’s formula is used with different longitudinal slopes
The discharges for rectangular section of side drains are calculated. The discharge capacities of
these sections are calculated for different slopes ranging from below 1% up to 12% depending upon
the road gradient. The calculated discharges for different slopes are given in tables for both types of
side drains.
Design Discharge:
Table 64 Design Discharge Capacity of Rectangular Side Drain
T year
S.N Chainage(m) C A(sq. km) L(m) S t(min) I(cm/hr) Q(m3/s)
frequency
1. T=10 0+00-14+000 0.3 1.88 2200 1.202 43.26 7.94 4.15
2. T=25 0+00-14+000 0.2 1.88 2200 1.645 43.26 8.99 5.07
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 96
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
CHAPTER-VI: DESIGN AND DRAWINGS
Design Discharge for cross drain(Q10)= 0.278*C*I*A
= 0.278*0.3*7.94*1.88
= 4.15 m3/s
Design Discharge for cross drain(Q25)= 0.278*C*I*A
= 0.278*0.3*8.99*1.88
= 5.07 m3/s
Replacement of cross drainage structures:
Replacement of slab culverts and pipe culverts are must as previously the structures were made
based on single lane standard and now it has to be upgraded in two lane standard. However, the
replacement of bridge depends upon the current condition and functioning of the bridge.
3 Pipe Culvert 0.6 0.28 0.28 1.884 0.15 0.025 0.014 3.17 0.89
4 Pipe Culvert 0.45 0.16 0.16 1.413 0.11 0.025 0.014 2.64 0.42
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 97
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
CHAPTER-VI: DESIGN AND DRAWINGS
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 98
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
CHAPTER-VI: DESIGN AND DRAWINGS
6.4 FORMATION WIDTH
Formation width of the adopted for the proposed road is 8.5 m. It includes 7 m carriage way,
Shoulder of 0.75 m (both side)and side drain on both side.
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 99
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
CHAPTER-VI: DESIGN AND DRAWINGS
6.10 CROSS SECTION
The cross section survey was conducted at every chainage point to obtain the existing ground
condition. Other necessary details were also taken during the cross section survey. The cross
section survey was conducted to a minimum of 25m on either side of the proposed center line of the
road. However, at places requiring further details the survey was extended beyond 15m to cover the
features.
6.20 STRUCTURE
The selection of one or the other types of structures is a subjective matter and reference has been
made to the type of cross-section, hazard level, soil characteristics and many other parameters.
Historical data were used widely rather than going into detailed quantity measurement. It is
assumed that for this level of study, exact quantity calculation is neither necessary nor relevant. The
cross-drainage, however, has been considered when the proposed alignment passes through the
natural depression (e.g., river, stream, gully, etc.). The cross-drainage structures like culvert and
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 102
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
CHAPTER-VI: DESIGN AND DRAWINGS
bridge are classified as following. This classification is merely based on the recommendation of
NRS 2045.
Culverts: up to 8m span (Slab, Pipe)
Minor bridge: up to 20m span
Medium bridges: about 20m length, span<20m
Major bridges: Span>20m
In addition, pipe drains at frequent intervals depending upon the extent of catchment uphill have
been proposed to let the surface run off downhill. In all cross-drainages, the width of road is kept
equal to the carriageway width plus shoulders. The loading standard to be adopted for the design of
bridges and culverts will be IRC class AA and A.
7.1 GENERAL
This study aims to identify the major environmental impacts that will be caused by the proposed
road project. Being a concise study, the TOR has not been prepared and the issues in this study are
based on the direct field visit.
Chemical impacts
The construction work itself and unawareness of the worker may pollute the air as well as river
during the construction and improper waste disposal should be discouraged in the construction
phase. These impacts are direct, medium significant, local level and short term in nature.
Cross drainage
There are some drainages passing to agricultural land. These drainages should be maintained as the
local people are depended to irrigate their agricultural land through these drainages. The upgrading
work will create direct, highly significant, site-specific to local and long term impact on existing
drainage system in the area.
II)Adverse Impacts: Operation Stage
Air and noise pollution
GEOCE-UNIQUE-Y.G.F JV Page | 109
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION OF “MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI”
CHAPTER-VII: ENVIRONMENT STUDY
Operation of vehicles in roads in the operation phase can cause air and noise pollution. As the
density of vehicles in the road is expected to be comparatively high, the impact due to noise and air
pollution from vehicles will be high and will become nuisance to sensitive spots like schools areas,
residential areas and the temple areas. The impacts will be direct, of low to medium significance,
site-specific and long-term in nature.
Type of Project phase Impacts Way of Level of Extent of impact Duration of impact
impacts impact significance
(on socio- infrastructure
economical
and cultural Occupational health and Indirect Minor Site specific Short term
environment) safety
Sanitation issues Direct Minor Site specific Short term
Type of Project phase Impacts Way of Level of Extent of impact Duration of impact
impacts impact significance
development
Adverse (on upgrading Impact on natural floral Direct/indirect Medium Local Long term
biological status due to tree felling
environment) Impacts on natural habitats Direct Low Local Short term
Type of Project phase Impacts Way of Level of Extent of impact Duration of impact
impacts impact significance
local
operation Air and noise pollution Direct Low to medium Site-specific Long term
The environmental legislation is very clear with regard to environmental monitoring and auditing and EPR,
1997 empowers the concerned agency – the Ministry of Physical Infrastructure and Transport in this case --
for environmental monitoring at all phases of the project and MoPE for environmental auditing after two
years of service start by the project.
Under Section 10 of the Act, Watershed Conservation Officer has authority to grant permission to
construct dams, drainage ditches, canals, cut privately owned trees, excavate sand, boulders and
soil, discharge solid waste and establish industry or residential areas within any protected
watershed.
7.6.6 Public Road Act,1974
Article 19 of the Act mandates the requirement of permission from the Department of Roads to
carry out activities within the limits of the road boundaries. GON offices as per Article 29 have to
submit a request for permission to the Department of Roads prior to the start of activities within the
limits of the public roads.
7.6.8 Solid Waste Management Act, 2011
This act has set provisions as prime responsibility of the polluters to manage waste. Similarly, the
act outlines the duties of the local government to take action against haphazard waste generation,
disposal or collection and has penalizing provisions to those engaged in activities detrimental to the
intentions of the Act.
8.1.2MAINTENANCE COST
Estimation of benefits arising from the implementation of the road project requires comparison of “with project” situation with “without project”
situation. The later, is therefore, critical in that it determines the level from which incremental benefits from the implementation of the project
Summary of Cost
Government of Nepal
Ministry of Physical Infrastructure and Transport
Department of Roads
Planning & Design Branch
Planning Monitoring and Evaluation Unit
Chakupat, Lalitpur
SUMMARY OF COST
F/Y : 073/74
Name of Project : DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION (DPR) OF MAUWA NGARDAH SADAK,
DOTI (14 KM); UNDER CONTRACT NO: PMEU/337159/073/74 DPR49.
H Road Furnitures and Traffic Safety Measures Sub - Total (H) 3,741,265.89 0.69%
Abstract of Cost
Government of Nepal
Ministry of Physical Infrastructure and Transport
Department of Roads
Planning & Design Branch
Planning Monitoring and Evaluation Unit
Chakupat, Lalitpur
ABSTRACT OF COST
F/Y : 073/74
Name of Project : DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEY, DESIGN OF ROAD AND REPORT PREPARATION (DPR) OF MAUWA
NGARDAH SADAK, DOTI (14 KM); UNDER CONTRACT NO: PMEU/337159/073/74 DPR49.
Location : Doti District
Section : 0+000 to 14+000 Km Length (KM) 12.796
S.N. Description of works Unit Quantity Rate, (NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
A General Item
Insurance for the loss of damage to works, plant,
A.1 material, equipment, property and personnel injury PS 1.00
350,000.00 350,000.00
or death and third party as per condition of contract.
Establishing engineers site office including three
rooms, bathroom, toilet and kitchen facilities, mon
A.2 1.00
furnitures and well furnished as per details provided th 150,000.00 150,000.00
in bid document.
Relocation of services and repairing for existing
infrastructure (houses, water supply
A.3 PS 1.00
pipes,kulos,Temple, Foot staircase, Foot trail etc) 500,000.00 500,000.00
as instructed by engineer.
B Site Clearance
Clearing of grass, removing roots, breaking sods,
B.1 levelling the surface and disposal as per sqm 88851 8.84
785,442.84
specification (SS/SP-201)
Felling trees including cutting of trunks and
branches, removing the roots, stacking serviceable
B.2 materials and disposal of unserviceable materials to
suitable place all complete as per Contract
Documents: (SS/SP-201)
300mm - 600mm girth size no 200 354.17
70,834.00
600mm-900mm girth size no 50 1347.36
67,368.00
900mm-1800mm girth size no 20 3753.38
75,067.60
Sub - Total
(B) 998,712.44
C Earthworks
Sub - Total
(D) 115,087,904.02
F Pavement Works
Preparation of sub-grade filling or cutting depth of 107890.5
F.1 sqm
10 to 20 cm 0 10.93 1,179,243.17
Providing, laying, spreading, watering, levelling and
cu.
F.2 compaction of natural sand gravel subbase grading 16183.58
m. 4,428.40 71,667,365.67
as per table 12.1 of standard specification. [1201 ]
Providing, laying, spreading, watering, levelling and
compaction of crusher run materials for base course cu.
F.3 21578.10
lead upto 10m. m. 2,486.10 53,645,314.41
(a) Machine works [1202 ]
Providing and spraying bituminious prime coat MC
F.4 30/70 including cleaning the road surface using wire, Lit 79965.90
176.58 14,120,378.62
brushes,broom ete. before applying prime coat.
Surface Dressing: Providing,laying of double
bituminous coats for surface dressing using river 195472.2
F.5 Lit
single/chips including compaction. Bitumen binder 0 166.43 32,532,438.24
for surface dressing all complete (1301,1303)
Providing and laying of cutter for surface dressing as
F.6 Lit 9773.61
directed by the Engineer all complete. 90.09 880,504.52
Surface dressing : Providing, and laying of double
bituminous coats for surface dressing using river
F.7 singles/chips including compaction. Chippings for Mt. 2487.83
2,577.31 6,411,909.13
surface dressing for first coat size and second coat
size all complete.
Providing and mixing anti-stripping agent all
F.8 complete as per specification.(@ 0.5% of Bit. kg 977.36
404.28 395,127.10
Binder)
Sub - Total
(F) 180,832,280.86
G Drain Works
Earthwork in excavation in all type of soil including
G.1 cum 14837.29
rock for drain works 95.66 1,419,335.16
Providing and Placing machine mixed cement
G.2 concrete M15/40 including compaction, curing, cum 1447.09
9,746.61 14,104,221.86
testing all complete. (SS/SP-2000)
One layear flat brick solling with sand filling in joint , Cum
G.3 11576.69
etc all complete as per specification . . 382.44 4,427,389.32
Drain Cover
Providing and placing machine mixed M25/20
cement concrete for the foundation and footing etc.
including compaction, curing, testing and lead 30m. nos 1447.13 12158.08
17,594,322.31
etc. all complete as per specification and drawing.
[2000 ]
Providing and laying Reinforcement ( diameter
above 8 mm and upto 16 mm) including cutting, 112065.3
kg 121.28
bending, binding, fixing in position etc. all complete 6 13,591,286.86
as per specification and drawing. [2000 ]
Sub - Total
(G) 155,407,651.29
Total (A+B+C+D+E+F+G+H+I)
542,109,646.60
VAT @13%
70,474,254.05
Contingency @ 5%
27,105,482.33
Purpose It will be trade route in distance to join House hold Efficient movement of
Development of the Trade Route of 2 Lane Mustang and China Border and other survey different vehicles.
between Nepal and China Border. roads.
Transportation Co-operatives will be
It will save transportation costs and time Costs Records successfully established.
of passengers and goods and benefits
will be increased. Co-operative
accounts of users.
Means of
Narrative Summary Objectively Verifiable Indicators (OVI) Key Assumptions
Verification (MOV)
Economic growth rate will be increased.
Economic growth
rate record.
Outputs There will be good movement of Work completion Construction work will be
1. Upgradation of road connecting the three passengers and goods even in monsoon records completed in time by
districts Bajhang, Baitadi&Darchula to 2 season. contractor.
Lane Road. Origin and
All urban people will have access to destination Timely maintenance of
2. Connecting previously unconnected urban district headquarters. survey Road.
areas to the district headquarters
Transportation will be increased by 6% Transportation of Efficient movements of
goods record. vehicles.
Means of
Narrative Summary Objectively Verifiable Indicators (OVI) Key Assumptions
Verification (MOV)
3. Mobilization of construction team of workers, bio-engineering works, budgets for construction by
4. Set-up of camp at various chainages contingencies (including VAT) concerned ministries and
5. Mobilization of construction equipments, As per BOQ departments.
vehicles and other necessary tools to site Construction costs for 2nd year:
6. Supply of construction materials to sites. Timely procurement of
7. Preparation of work schedule with detail All construction work including construction works
work description different construction items, insurance
8. Layout and then construction in field as per of workers, bio-engineering works, Proper check of quality of
drawings and specification contingencies (including VAT) As per BOQ works
9. Assure quality of works to consultant or
client. Construction costs for 3rd year:
Timely monitoring and
10. Preparation of variation order and BOQ and
evaluation of works by
its submission to consultant or client All construction work including
consultants or clients.
different construction items, insurance
of workers, bio-engineering works,
contingencies (including VAT) Proper verification of bill of
quantities and variation
order.