https://theconversation.

com/free-falling-dead-stars-show-that-a-cornerstone-of-physics-holds-up-99168

Free-falling dead stars show that a cornerstone of physics holds up

It may not be intuitive, but drop a hammer and a feather and – in the absence of air resistance – they will hit the ground at exactly
the same time. This is a key principle of physics known as “universal free fall”, stating that all objects accelerate identically in the
same gravitational field. In fact, it’s an important theme in Albert Einstein’s immensely successful theory of general relativity, which
describes how gravity works.

But although we know it holds true for hammers and feathers, it’s been unclear whether the principle extends to extreme objects
such as stars. Now a new study, published in Nature, has tested the principle using a remarkably extreme astrophysical environment:
a triple star system containing two white dwarfs and a pulsar (a rotating neutron star that beams radio waves). These objects are the
extremely dense remnants of dead stars.

Spoiler alert: It turns out Einstein is still right, and it is getting even harder to prove him wrong.

But let’s start with the basics. Hold an object in your hand. It doesn’t matter what it is – the object will have some mass. We can
think of that mass in two ways. Isaac Newton taught us that if we apply a force to a body it will undergo an acceleration, and the size
of that acceleration is directly proportional to the amount of force applied – and inversely proportional to the mass itself. Give a
broken-down car a push and it won’t accelerate very quickly, but apply that same push to a shopping trolley and you’ll send it
careering down the aisle. When thinking about the acceleration of an object due to a force exerted on it, we think about the “inertial
mass” of the body.

Any two objects with mass are attracted to each other through the gravitational force. So the object you are holding in your hand is
attracted to the Earth, and the size of the force pulling it down is dependent on the mass of the object. In this case, we think about
the “gravitational mass”.

If you dropped it, the object you are holding would “free fall” – the force of gravity would accelerate it towards the ground. The size
of the force pulling the object down depends on the gravitational mass, but the amount of acceleration depends on the inertial mass.
But is there any difference between the two types of mass? To find out, we can write down an equation of motion linking the two
types of mass: inertial mass on one side of the equation and gravitational mass on the other.

The equation predicts something we can test using an experiment: if inertial mass is equivalent to gravitational mass, then all objects
should fall towards the Earth with an identical acceleration regardless of their mass. That often surprises people. This is called the
“Equivalence Principle”.

Galileo first noticed that plummeting objects fall at the same rate, and you can do this experiment yourself by simultaneously
dropping two objects of different mass. However one problem doing this on Earth is the presence of another force acting on the
falling bodies, called air resistance. If you drop a hammer and a feather, the feather will tend to gently drift down to the ground,
lagging behind – the objects aren’t strictly in free fall. But go to the moon and do that experiment, as astronaut David Scott did
during Apollo 15, where there is no air resistance, and the Equivalence Principle is clear to see.

The pulsar-white dwarf pair can be considered to be in free fall towards the other white dwarf, because an orbit is just the case of
free fall without ever reaching the ground, like satellites around the Earth. Of course, the pulsar and white dwarf are very massive
objects themselves, with strong self gravity. General relativity predicts that the accelerations of the white dwarf and pulsar, due to
being in free fall towards the outer white dwarf, should be identical – despite differences in mass and self-gravity.

Combining observations that span six years of monitoring, the astrophysicists carefully modelled the orbits of the pair. They
measured a parameter called Delta, which describes the fractional difference between the acceleration of the white dwarf and the
more massive pulsar. If general relativity holds, then Delta should be equal to zero. The results indicate that, within the uncertainties
of the measurements, the difference in accelerations is indeed statistically consistent with zero – we can say with 95% confidence
that Delta is less than 0.0000026.

This new constraint is far better than anything previously measured. It provides valuable new empirical evidence that general
relativity remains our best model of how gravity works, so we are unlikely to need any new or modified theories at this point. This
come just weeks after general relativity was proven right on a galactic scale for the first time.

Will we ever find a situation where general relativity breaks down? In a way I do hope so, because it would reveal new physics. But
the continuing success of general relativity, first written down a century ago, must surely be celebrated as one of the most incredible
intellectual achievements of our species.