Sie sind auf Seite 1von 14

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/290852323

The long-chain fatty acid composition as a tool for differentiating


spoilage wine yeasts

Article  in  Mycotaxon -Ithaca Ny- · January 1989

CITATIONS READS

14 43

3 authors, including:

Manuel Malfeito Ferreira Virgilio Loureiro


University of Lisbon Technical University of Lisbon
79 PUBLICATIONS   2,020 CITATIONS    96 PUBLICATIONS   2,570 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Consumer research on wine and food preferences View project

Project Biopeptides (FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-014055) View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Manuel Malfeito Ferreira on 07 March 2016.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


International Journal of Food Microbiology 38 (1997) 143–155

Fatty acid profiling: a feasible typing system to trace yeast


contamination in wine bottling plants

M. Malfeito-Ferreira, M. Tareco, V. Loureiro*


´
Laboratorio ˆ
de Microbiologia, Departamento de Botanica ´
e Engenharia Biologica , Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Tapada da Ajuda,
1399 Lisboa Codex, Portugal

Received 23 March 1997; received in revised form 6 August 1997; accepted 19 September 1997

Abstract

The long-chain fatty acid composition of yeast strains was determined for several species associated with the wine
industry. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Zygosaccharomyces bailii, Saccharomycodes ludwigii, Schizosaccharomyces
pombe, Brettanomyces /Dekkera spp., Pichia anomala, Pichia membranaefaciens and Lodderomyces elongisporus species
presented distinct fatty acid profiles after multivariate statistical analysis. The Zygosaccharomyces rouxii species showed
profiles similar to Zygosaccharomyces bailii. The use of fatty acid profiling in wine bottling plants and wines makes it
possible to trace the origin of the strains responsible for spoiling the final product. In one case the origin was found at the
outlet of the finishing filter and identified as Zygosaccharomyces bailii. In the other case the source of contamination was
discovered in the heads of the filling machine and assigned to the Pichia membranaefaciens species. The results point out the
discriminating power and the industrial applicability of the technique described in this work to analyse yeast long-chain fatty
acid compositions.  1997 Elsevier Science B.V.

Keywords: Spoilage yeasts; Wines; Fatty acid composition; Zygosaccharomyces bailii

1. Introduction Therefore, it would be of considerable value to have


a method which could distinguish between ‘innocent’
One of the major concerns for wine technologists contamination yeasts and spoilage yeasts. This would
are stability problems caused by yeasts in wines. provide a more precise tool for the interpretation of
Most wineries rely on plate counts for their routine the results in terms of risk to bottled wine stability.
microbiological control. The yeasts isolated from Several attempts have been made to develop
wine plants are quite diversified but only few species methods for yeast differentiation, besides conven-
spoil wine (Loureiro and Malfeito-Ferreira, 1993). tional identification procedures, such as selective
media, serology, isoenzymes, nucleic acid typing
*Corresponding author. Tel.: 1 351 1 3638161; fax: 1 351 1 analysis and the analysis of fatty acid and protein
3635031. compositions as reviewed by Fleet (1992), and Van

0168-1605 / 97 / $17.00  1997 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.


PII S0168-1605( 97 )00096-2
144 M. Malfeito-Ferreira et al. / International Journal of Food Microbiology 38 (1997) 143 – 155

der Vossen and Hofstra (1996). Most of these membrane filtration and incubation as previously
methodologies were developed without a detailed described. Wines presenting visible sediments were
concern for industrial applicability and seem not analysed by pipetting the minimum amount of liquid
efficient enough to differentiate the yeasts associated necessary to withdraw the sediments from the bottom
with the wine industry. of the bottles and inoculating them onto GYP plates.
The use of fatty acid profiling as a biomarker has Air contamination was assessed by placing GYP
been used since the work of Abel et al. (1963) to petri dishes (9 cm diameter) at several locations in
type bacteria of clinical interest. With yeasts most of the bottling line and leaving them open for 10 min.
the research has been done by the group at the Corks were analysed by strong agitation for 30 s in
University of Bloemfontein (Kock et al., 1985; Smit 100 ml Ringer solution followed by membrane
et al., 1988; Augustyn and Kock, 1989; Viljoen et al., filtration and incubation as previously described.
1988, 1993). One specifically deals with yeast Membrane filtration was also used for analysing
species associated with the wine industry (Tredoux bottle contamination after rinsing with 100 ml of
et al., 1987). Ringer solution. All incubations were carried out at
The work described in this paper represents an 25ºC over a period of three to seven days. Strains
extension of the research initiated by Malfeito-Fer- selected according to different colony morphology
reira et al. (1989) into the use of fatty acid profiles as were purified by restreaking onto the same medium
a biomarker. The technique developed differs mainly and maintained on GYP slants at 4ºC. Fresh cultures
from that of Kock et al. (1985) in the use of a solid incubated for 24–48 h on GYP slants were used for
medium for yeast growth which makes it much more the subsequent analysis. Strain identification fol-
attractive for industrial purposes and it has already lowed the conventional methodologies described by
been tried on yeasts associated with breweries Barnett et al. (1983) and Kreger-van Rij (1984).
(Moreira-da-Silva et al., 1994). The results presented
in this work include the fatty acid profiling of several 2.2. Long-chain fatty acid analysis
yeast strains isolated from wine bottling plants and
the comparison of the profiles obtained with those of Production of biomass and long-chain fatty acid
strains identified by the conventional methodologies analysis have been described elsewhere (Moreira-da-
described in the manuals of Barnett et al. (1983) and Silva et al., 1994). Briefly, purified yeast strains were
Kreger-van Rij (1984). suspended in Ringer solution and a drop of this
suspension was spread onto GYP agar to form a
large colony, about 2 cm diameter, after 48 h of
incubation at 258C. Biomass extraction and fatty acid
2. Material and methods derivatization were attained by alkaline saponifica-
tion (5% w / v NaOH, Merck, in 50% v / v methanol,
2.1. Yeast strain origin, isolation and identification Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and methylation (14%
w / v BF3 in methanol, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany).
The yeast strains analysed were obtained from Methyl esters were separated by GLC (Perkin Elmer,
several culture collections or isolated from wineries model 8410, Norwalk, USA) using a wide-bore DB-
and bottled wines (Table 1). Wine samples were wax column (JW Scientific, Folsom, USA) and
analysed by filtering 10 to 100 ml through cellulose identified by the comparison of relative retention
acetate membranes of 0.45 mm pore size and in- times of known standards (Sigma Chemical Co., St.
cubating onto GYP agar (glucose (Merck, Darm- Louis, USA).
stadt, Germany) 20 g l 21 , yeast extract (Difco Statistical data treatment was performed by Princi-
Laboratories, Detroit, USA) 5 g l 21 , peptone (Difco pal Component Analysis (PCA) using the SPAD
10 g l 21 and agar 20 g l 21 , pH 6.0). Equipment software (Systeme´ Portable d’Analyse des Donnes ´
contamination was assessed by using cotton swabs ´
Numeriques, Centre International de Statistique et
immersed in Ringer solution (Oxoid, Unipath Ltd., d’Informatique Appliquees, ´ Saint-Mande, ´ France,
Basingstoke, England) or by analysing the rinsing 1993). This analysis groups the yeast strains into
water used in equipment sanitation followed by several clusters according to the similarity in their
Table 1 M. Malfeito-Ferreira et al. / International Journal of Food Microbiology 38 (1997) 143 – 155 145
List of studied yeast strains
Species Laboratory number a Origin
Strains from culture collections
S. cerevisiae ISA 1000 IGC 4072, active dry wine yeast
ISA 1011 IGC 4614, active dry wine yeast
ISA 1197 IGC 4455, CBS 1171, type strain
S. cerevisiae var bayanus ISA 1198 IGC 4456, CBS 380, type strain
S. cerevisiae var pastorianus ISA 1207 DBVPG 1243, wine
Zygosaccharomyces bailii (S. acidifaciens)b ISA 1006 CBS 749, type strain
Zygosaccharomyces bailii ISA 1108 IGC 4227, NRRL S9 144
ISA 1149 UCD 801, IGC 5167, type strain
ISA 1206 Lemon concentrate
ISA 1212 DVBPG 6379, CBS 2902
ISA 1213 DVBPG 6453, CBS 3014
ISA 1214 DVBPG 6454, CBS 3016
Zygosaccharomyces rouxii ISA 1188 CECT 1231, orange skin
ISA 1194 CECT 1229, sugar cane
ISA 1322 Soya beans
Pichia membranaefaciens ISA 1005 CBS 107, IGC 3796, type strain
ISA 1195 IGC 3316, CBS 2098, wine
ISA 1196 IGC 3321, CBS 2100, wine
Dekkera intermedia ISA 1146 UCD 605
Brettanomyces bruxellensis ISA 1147 UCD 615
Pichia anomala ISA 1004 CBS 605, IGC 3294
ISA 1185 CECT 1107
Saccharomycodes ludwigii ISA 1093 White wine
ISA 1186 CECT 1382
ISA 1218 DBVPG 2704
S. pombe ISA 1190 CECT 1375
ISA 1191 CECT 1376
ISA 1192 CECT 1377
ISA 1193 CECT 1381
Strains isolated from wineries
S. cerevisiae var bayanus ISA 1028, ISA 1029 Sediments in bottled wines
Zygosaccharomyces bailii ISA 1022, ISA 1023, ISA Sediments in bottled wines
1024, ISA 1025, ISA 1027,
ISA 1031
ISA 1307 Equipment for production of sparkling wine
ISA 1430, ISA 1431, ISA Bottled wine plant A
1432, ISA 1433
Zygosaccharomyces rouxii ISA 1220 Concentrated grape juice
Pichia membranaefaciens ISA 1030 Sediments in bottled wine
ISA 1239, ISA 1241 Contaminants in bottled wine
ISA 1399, ISA 1400, ISA Wine filler plant B
1401, ISA 1403
ISA 1404 Contamination in bottled wint plant B
ISA 1423, ISA 1424 Wine filler plant A
ISA 1429 Bottled wine plant A
Brettanomyces bruxellensis ISA 1327, ISA 1328 Bottled sparkling wine
Pichia anomala ISA 1420 Wine filler plant A
Lodderomyces elongisporus ISA 1421, ISA 1422 Wine filler plant A
Saccharomycodes ludwigii ISA 1083, ISA 1088, ISA Contaminants in sweet bottled wine
1089
Unidentified strains 3 to 43 26 strains isolated from plant A
a
Abbreviations: ISA, Instituto Superior de Agronomia; IGC, Gulbenkian Institute of Science; CBS, Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures;
˜
CECT, Coleccion Espanola de Cultivos Tipo; DBVPG, Dipartamento de Biologia Vegetale della Universita´ di Perugia; UCD, University of
California, Davis.
b
Synonim of the species described by Barnett et al. (1983) and Kreger-van Rij (1984).
146

Table 2
Long-chain fatty acid profiles of analysed yeast strains (NID, unidentified fatty acids)
ISA Fatty acids

strains C 14:0 C 14:1 C 15:0 C 15:1 C 16:0 C 16:1 NID 1 C 17:0 NID 2 NID 3 C 18:0 C 18:1 C 18:2 NID 4 C 18:3

Brettanomyces spp. /Dekkera spp.


1146 3,061,0 0,260,2 0,260,0 0,160,1 20,061,0 47,061,8 3,960,6 0,0 0,0 0,0 1,460,4 15,161,2 9,361,2 0,0 0,0
1147 1,560,3 0,360,1 0,460,1 0,160,1 21,461,0 33,561,2 3,660,4 0,0 0,660,1 0,0 2,260,5 23,461,4 12,961,2 0,0 0,0
1327 1,260,1 0,160,0 0,960,2 0,760,2 20,561,4 29,462,5 3,760,3 0,160,0 1,360,4 1,760,5 5,760,1 19,463,9 9,562,0 4,961,2 0,860,3
1328 1,260,4 0,160,1 1,260,4 0,760,3 21,761,4 28,262,1 3,560,1 0,060,0 0,960,2 2,260,8 5,660,9 18,861,8 9,060,9 5,861,8 0,960,4

Lodderomyces elongisporus
1421 0,360,0 0,060,0 0,260,0 0,060,0 13,461,0 2,760,2 0,0 0,760,2 0,960,1 0,260,1 7,060,4 48,060,5 21,661,1 0,160,0 4,860,7
1422 0,260,0 0,060,0 0,160,0 0,060,1 12,360,2 1,660,1 0,0 0,760,0 0,960,0 0,260,0 9,760,3 51,660,6 18,860,8 0,0 3,960,2

Pichia anomala
1004 0,360,0 0,060,0 0,260,0 0,060,0 18,960,6 3,060,2 0,160,0 0,260,0 0,460,1 0,0 3,660,3 38,061,7 26,661,2 0,0 8,661,2
1185 0,660,2 0,060,0 0,460,1 0,060,0 23,460,3 7,960,7 0,560,1 0,160,0 0,560,2 0,0 1,960,1 30,963,1 25,060,6 0,0 8,861,0
1420 0,360,0 0,160,0 0,260,0 0,060,0 20,760,2 3,260,2 0,260,0 0,260,0 0,260,1 0,160,3 4,760,2 39,960,4 23,760,9 0,0 6,660,5

Pichia membranaefaciens
1005 0,660,0 0,360,1 0,560,0 0,060,0 17,560,4 26,761,9 0,460,0 0,560,0 0,660,1 0,0 3,660,3 33,961,6 11,660,4 0,0 3,860,1
1030 0,160,0 0,0 1,060,1 0,560,0 11,760,8 13,261,2 0,460,1 0,660,0 2,660,4 1,060,0 5,460,1 29,561,1 19,560,3 6,360,4 8,360,2
1195 0,460,1 0,260,1 0,760,2 0,160,0 18,360,9 11,961,5 0,360,0 1,560,4 1,960,0 0,960,3 5,160,9 27,861,9 17,962,2 2,060,4 10,160,1
1196 0,160,0 0,060,0 0,260,1 0,060,0 11,260,8 10,560,3 0,160,1 0,560,1 1,560,5 0,0 2,660,5 46,761,1 17,260,1 0,0 9,460,6
1239 1,160,8 0,560,2 1,460,4 0,960,3 10,861,0 10,761,4 0,760,1 1,060,3 2,860,7 1,260,9 3,760,8 36,360,3 19,060,8 3,162,1 7,160,7
1241 1,060,3 0,660,2 2,861,2 2,761,7 12,060,2 19,461,2 1,260,5 1,160,2 5,761,1 2,161,4 4,060,5 28,366,3 12,061,5 3,961,0 3,860,3
1399 0,360,0 0,060,0 0,560,1 0,060,0 13,760,2 16,760,7 0,360,0 0,960,1 4,260,8 0,0 2,160,2 37,860,3 18,060,9 0,0 5,660,3
1400 0,360,0 0,160,0 0,360,0 0,060,0 14,661,1 19,260,1 0,360,0 0,560,0 2,460,3 0,0 2,160,2 39,960,5 16,260,2 0,0 4,060,4
1401 0,360,0 0,160,0 0,760,1 0,060,0 15,960,9 17,860,5 0,260,0 1,060,0 5,160,0 0,0 1,160,4 36,860,7 16,760,6 0,0 4,560,4
1403 0,460,1 0,160,1 0,360,1 0,160,1 13,760,6 17,360,3 0,560,1 0,560,1 1,560,4 0,0 2,360,5 35,261,3 19,760,5 0,0 8,560,7
1404 0,560,1 0,060,0 0,360,1 0,060,0 15,561,4 19,963,6 0,560,4 0,160,1 0,860,5 0,0 1,660,6 36,561,3 17,560,8 0,0 6,760,4
1423 0,260,0 0,160,0 0,260,0 0,160,0 10,360,4 10,060,5 0,0 0,660,1 3,760,4 0,360,1 1,260,4 52,861,8 14,660,4 0,060,0 6,060,2
1424 0,260,1 0,260,1 0,260,1 0,160,1 10,761,4 19,563,2 0,360,0 0,360,3 2,261,4 0,160,2 2,260,7 49,968,9 16,661,2 0,060,0 6,260,7
1429 0,360,2 0,160,1 0,460,1 0,160,1 10,460,8 19,561,9 0,560,1 0,660,1 3,460,2 0,460,0 1,660,1 39,461,8 16,761,1 0,060,0 6,860,7

S. cerevisiae
1000 0,460,2 0,160,0 0,360,2 0,360,1 8,660,7 39,261,6 0,360,2 0,160,1 0,860,5 2,061,7 4,260,6 38,261,9 0,560,4 3,261,1 0,260,0
M. Malfeito-Ferreira et al. / International Journal of Food Microbiology 38 (1997) 143 – 155

1011 0,760,1 0,360,0 0,160,0 0,260,0 13,460,6 39,560,9 0,060,0 0,260,0 0,360,1 0,060,0 3,560,2 41,560,3 0,360,2 0,0 0,260,0
1028 1,460,1 0,460,0 0,360,1 0,160,0 17,361,8 47,160,9 0,060,0 0,160,0 0,460,1 0,060,0 2,660,1 30,062,3 0,360,1 0,0 0,0
1029 1,560,4 0,960,9 0,360,1 0,160,1 18,060,7 39,462,4 0,0 0,260,1 0,160,1 0,0 3,160,5 35,463,2 0,860,4 0,0 0,460,3
1197 0,960,2 0,460,1 0,160,0 0,260,0 11,060,5 34,863,0 0,060,0 0,160,0 0,360,0 0,160,0 6,660,8 45,362,6 0,260,2 0,0 0,160,1
1198 0,360,5 0,260,1 0,160,0 0,160,0 18,760,5 43,863,1 0,0 0,260,0 0,360,0 0,260,1 2,860,5 33,262,3 0,160,1 0,0 0,060,1
1207 1,160,1 0,660,0 0,260,0 0,160,0 12,160,9 47,061,9 0,0 0,360,1 0,460,1 0,060,0 3,260,4 34,562,1 0,360,1 0,360,1 0,060,0
S. ludwigii
1083 0,960,1 0,560,1 0,360,0 0,360,1 9,260,3 59,262,6 0,0 0,460,2 0,460,1 0,360,1 1,360,3 24,761,8 0,060,0 2,060,1 0,660,1
1088 0,860,1 0,560,1 0,460,3 0,560,3 8,460,7 58,164,8 0,0 0,560,3 0,560,2 0,360,1 1,660,4 25,763,0 0,460,0 2,460,1 0,660,3
1089 0,860,2 0,660,2 0,360,1 0,360,1 8,260,6 58,661,8 0,060,0 0,260,0 0,260,1 0,760,1 1,960,2 25,061,3 0,360,1 2,460,4 0,660,3
1093 0,760,1 0,860,4 0,560,1 0,560,2 8,560,3 55,663,6 0,760,4 0,060,1 0,960,4 0,560,3 1,860,6 26,861,8 0,260,0 2,060,3 0,760,4
1186 0,660,1 0,560,1 0,260,1 0,260,1 8,460,6 55,161,0 0,0 0,660,3 0,860,3 0,560,2 1,660,1 29,362,8 0,360,1 1,360,6 0,760,8
1218 1,360,1 0,660,1 0,060,0 0,260,3 11,161,2 59,161,4 0,060,0 0,160,0 0,160,0 0,460,5 1,760,4 25,061,0 0,360,1 0,060,1 0,160,0

S. pombe
1190 0,960,2 0,260,3 0,660,4 0,760,4 11,760,8 2,360,3 0,160,2 0,860,1 0,960,2 0,560,1 4,060,2 74,362,5 0,560,1 2,060,3 0,560,3
1191 0,860,1 0,160,0 0,760,2 0,560,1 10,560,9 0,860,1 0,0 1,060,6 0,660,4 0,460,4 5,360,1 74,160,2 0,660,1 3,860,6 0,760,2
1192 0,860,1 0,060,0 0,360,4 0,560,1 11,660,5 0,860,0 0,0 1,060,1 0,760,1 0,560,0 5,760,5 73,460,9 0,360,1 3,360,1 0,760,0
1193 0,660,0 0,160,0 0,160,0 0,160,0 11,960,1 3,160,1 0,160,1 0,460,2 0,460,3 0,0 5,460,3 70,960,2 0,660,4 6,560,0 0,0

Zygosaccharomyces bailii
1006 0,260,0 0,260,0 0,660,3 0,560,2 6,960,5 9,960,6 0,360,1 0,160,2 0,760,2 1,160,2 6,760,5 44,162,4 25,960,6 2,761,0 0,360,1
1022 0,160,0 0,060,0 0,560,0 0,460,0 8,160,0 6,361,0 0,260,0 0,060,0 0,460,0 0,460,1 5,960,0 37,960,7 37,160,7 2,560,3 0,560,0
1023 0,360,0 0,160,0 0,660,2 0,560,2 9,760,7 6,860,9 0,0 0,660,2 0,760,3 0,660,3 7,760,7 36,762,8 31,762,1 3,762,0 0,860,3
1024 0,260,1 0,160,0 0,560,1 0,460,2 9,560,7 6,061,3 0,0 0,760,5 0,360,3 0,560,3 6,160,4 39,263,3 32,760,7 3,160,7 0,760,2
1025 0,260,1 0,060,0 0,260,1 0,360,1 8,960,6 9,461,2 0,460,1 0,460,1 0,960,1 0,560,1 4,960,5 38,760,1 32,962,1 1,760,7 0,660,2
1027 0,260,1 0,060,0 0,260,1 0,360,2 9,660,9 6,661,1 0,0 0,760,3 0,460,0 0,760,5 6,360,8 40,162,5 33,160,8 2,361,1 0,560,2
1031 0,260,1 0,060,0 0,260,2 0,260,2 10,761,6 7,861,6 0,160,1 0,260,1 0,560,1 0,360,1 5,961,0 44,261,7 27,165,0 2,461,1 0,360,4
1108 0,360,1 0,160,0 0,060,0 0,160,0 8,460,8 10,861,3 0,160,0 0,160,0 0,160,0 0,060,0 4,460,2 41,360,8 34,261,2 0,060,0 0,160,1
1149 2,261,0 0,160,1 0,060,0 0,160,0 14,161,3 11,660,4 0,260,0 0,160,1 0,260,1 0,060,0 2,660,4 43,360,8 25,460,2 0,060,0 0,060,0
1206 0,260,0 0,060,0 0,160,0 0,260,0 10,360,4 12,261,2 0,460,2 0,460,0 0,760,0 0,360,4 5,660,3 36,061,3 33,261,6 1,760,0 0,460,0
1212 0,260,1 0,060,0 0,460,2 0,260,2 9,160,3 10,161,3 0,0 1,060,4 0,560,0 0,460,1 5,360,5 41,461,9 28,961,2 2,160,8 1,561,0
1213 0,360,1 0,160,0 0,460,0 0,460,1 12,060,7 20,861,1 2,060,4 0,0 0,560,2 0,760,4 5,860,2 22,660,9 30,760,5 2,760,2 1,160,2
1214 0,160,0 0,060,0 0,160,0 0,160,0 8,960,1 13,460,4 0,560,3 0,460,2 0,860,5 0,960,7 4,060,2 34,062,1 34,360,7 1,260,7 0,860,7
1307 0,260,4 0,260,3 0,060,0 0,160,1 9,060,7 10,760,6 0,260,1 0,160,1 0,160,0 0,0 4,660,3 38,361,5 36,360,5 0,060,0 0,260,1
1430 0,260,1 0,160,0 0,160,0 0,360,1 9,761,3 7,561,2 0,160,0 0,160,0 0,360,1 0,260,2 4,560,3 38,961,3 37,961,8 0,060,0 0,160,0
1431 0,260,0 0,160,0 0,060,0 0,160,0 9,060,1 11,560,6 0,160,1 0,060,0 0,160,0 0,160,0 3,260,3 41,961,2 33,861,0 0,0 0,060,0
1432 0,260,0 0,060,0 0,060,0 0,160,0 9,660,3 9,561,0 0,160,1 0,060,0 0,160,0 0,160,1 4,160,5 36,561,4 39,560,7 0,160,1 0,260,2
1433 0,160,0 0,160,0 0,060,0 0,160,0 8,860,4 8,560,5 0,0 0,660,2 0,160,0 0,0 4,360,3 39,460,4 38,260,5 0,0 0,0

Zygosaccharomyces rouxii
1188 0,760,1 0,360,1 0,160,0 0,060,0 10,861,1 39,161,1 0,0 0,160,1 0,360,1 0,0 4,360,2 44,160,7 0,360,1 0,0 0,0
1194 0,560,1 0,160,1 0,160,0 0,160,1 10,060,5 11,361,2 0,460,1 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,260,6 42,761,0 32,760,4 0,0 0,0
1220 0,660,3 0,160,0 0,060,0 0,060,0 13,961,0 9,661,0 0,260,0 0,160,0 0,160,0 0,360,4 2,760,5 43,860,2 28,362,0 0,060,0 0,360,1
1322 0,460,1 0,060,0 0,760,0 0,260,1 17,361,0 10,160,3 1,060,3 0,860,1 1,960,2 0,460,1 5,060,4 35,960,7 18,860,5 1,860,6 5,860,5
M. Malfeito-Ferreira et al. / International Journal of Food Microbiology 38 (1997) 143 – 155

Unidentified strains
3 0,560,2 0,060,0 0,160,0 0,060,0 18,761,3 0,460,2 0,0 0,460,1 0,260,0 0,160,0 5,160,6 49,361,9 17,961,1 0,0 7,2160,9
4 0,360,0 0,060,0 0,360,1 0,360,2 20,061,0 2,360,4 0,260,1 0,360,1 0,560,3 0,160,1 5,560,5 38,060,8 25,160,6 0,0 7,460,7
5 0,460,1 0,060,0 0,260,0 0,060,0 19,961,7 0,460,1 0,060,1 0,560,1 0,160,0 0,060,0 9,860,8 33,261,8 29,560,9 0,0 5,960,2
6 0,460,0 0,160,0 0,260,0 0,160,0 22,160,3 3,260,1 0,260,1 0,260,1 0,460,1 0,160,1 4,160,5 40,061,0 22,060,6 0,0 7,060,7
7 0,360,0 0,160,0 0,560,1 0,160,1 12,160,2 10,860,5 0,0 1,460,1 4,160,2 0,460,1 2,560,3 42,161,3 18,960,5 0,160,0 7,460,2
9 0,260,0 0,060,0 0,160,0 0,060,0 16,760,3 3,560,2 0,360,1 0,460,1 0,760,2 0,160,1 4,760,9 53,761,3 13,660,6 0,060,0 5,860,3
147
148

Table 2. Continued
ISA Fatty acids

strains C 14:0 C 14:1 C 15:0 C 15:1 C 16:0 C 16:1 NID 1 C 17:0 NID 2 NID 3 C 18:0 C 18:1 C 18:2 NID 4 C 18:3

13 0,360,0 0,160,0 0,260,0 0,060,0 13,160,6 2,860,2 0,0 0,760,1 1,060,2 0,260,0 7,460,7 48,660,9 21,461,1 0,160,0 4,260,4
15 0,360,0 0,060,0 0,160,0 0,060,0 12,260,4 2,360,2 0,060,0 0,760,1 0,960,1 0,260,1 8,160,5 46,560,3 23,160,7 0,160,0 5,560,4
16 0,560,4 0,160,0 0,160,0 0,160,0 11,360,8 1,6360,1 0,0 0,960,0 0,060,1 0,160,0 8,261,4 50,761,0 20,561,9 0,160,0 4,960,7
18 0,260,0 0,160,0 1,060,7 0,160,0 11,560,1 11,660,7 0,0 1,560,1 4,760,2 0,360,0 1,660,2 38,661,8 19,460,7 0,160,0 9,560,3
19 0,260,0 0,160,0 0,360,1 0,160,0 11,760,4 8,160,8 0,0 1,260,1 3,060,6 0,460,1 2,660,3 41,261,4 18,460,3 0,160,0 12,860,1
20 0,960,2 0,060,0 0,160,1 0,060,0 20,960,6 1,160,6 0,0 0,260,1 0,360,2 0,060,0 2,960,3 49,961,7 14,760,8 0,060,0 8,960,5
23 0,760,2 0,160,0 0,360,1 0,160,0 16,160,9 25,461,9 0,0 0,560,1 1,160,1 0,0 3,460,7 52,462,2 0,160,0 0,060,0 0,060,0
24 0,860,2 0,060,0 0,160,0 0,060,0 21,060,5 0,760,4 0,0 0,360,1 0,560,1 0,060,0 5,160,3 48,060,8 16,960,8 0,060,0 6,760,8
26 0,360,1 0,160,0 0,460,1 0,060,0 19,461,5 3,260,4 0,0 0,660,0 0,760,0 0,160,1 7,360,4 51,460,8 12,860,9 0,160,0 3,860,7
27 0,360,1 0,060,0 0,160,0 0,060,0 12,660,7 2,660,1 0,0 0,760,1 0,560,5 0,160,0 8,660,7 47,162,6 22,561,7 0,160,0 4,760,6
28 0,360,0 0,160,0 0,460,1 0,060,0 12,660,7 13,561,2 0,0 0,960,1 3,760,9 0,260,1 1,960,3 43,960,9 17,060,4 0,060,0 5,860,6
29 0,260,0 0,160,1 0,260,0 0,160,0 9,960,5 14,961,2 0,160,6 0,360,1 1,860,5 0,260,1 1,860,3 47,561,7 16,160,3 0,060,0 7,060,5
30 0,560,0 0,260,1 0,160,1 0,160,1 10,460,1 46,463,1 0,0 0,160,1 0,460,1 0,060,0 2,460,4 38,662,3 0,660,3 0,0 0,360,2
31 0,360,0 0,260,1 0,260,1 0,260,2 9,460,7 18,860,4 0,360,0 0,460,1 2,861,0 0,260,1 1,660,1 44,061,1 15,361,2 0,060,0 6,461,3
32 0,360,0 0,060,0 0,560,0 0,060,0 13,860,6 11,660,3 0,260,0 0,960,0 3,160,3 0,360,0 2,060,1 38,160,6 17,260,2 0,160,0 12,060,1
33 0,160,1 0,160,0 0,260,0 0,060,0 11,060,1 13,060,3 0,260,0 0,560,1 3,360,4 0,260,1 1,560,1 46,460,1 17,460,4 0,060,0 6,160,2
36 0,360,1 0,160,1 0,060,0 0,260,1 9,861,0 11,361,3 0,0 0,160,0 0,160,0 0,160,1 3,360,2 40,261,1 34,561,5 0,060,0 0,060,0
39 0,360,1 0,160,0 0,060,0 0,160,0 8,760,3 9,160,9 0,160,1 0,060,1 0,160,0 0,160,1 3,660,5 43,960,5 33,860,4 0,0 0,160,0
41 0,260,1 0,160,1 0,060,0 0,160,0 10,962,4 7,261,0 0,160,0 0,660,7 0,360,3 0,060,0 4,860,2 36,461,0 39,163,2 0,060,0 0,360,5
43 0,260,0 0,160,0 0,060,0 0,260,0 9,860,5 8,560,6 1,461,0 0,160,1 0,160,1 0,060,0 4,260,6 37,260,7 38,062,0 0,0 0,160,0
M. Malfeito-Ferreira et al. / International Journal of Food Microbiology 38 (1997) 143 – 155
M. Malfeito-Ferreira et al. / International Journal of Food Microbiology 38 (1997) 143 – 155 149

fatty acid compositions. The statistical stability of splitting Saccharomycodes ludwigii strains does not
the partition is weighed by its inertia relation. A have any taxonomical meaning (results not shown).
particular partition is considered stable if an increase Thus the partition into four clusters appeared to be
in the number of clusters does not significatively the most suitable for separating the yeasts in this
extend this parameter, the maximum theoretical group.
value of which is 1 (Lebart et al., 1984). The two species in group II were firstly separated
into two clusters, one for Brettanomyces /Dekkera
and the other for Zygosaccharomyces bailii strains,
3. Results with an inertia relation of 0.66. An increase in the
number of clusters to three splits the
The fatty acid compositions of the analysed yeast Zygosaccharomyces bailii cluster, with an inertia
strains are presented in Table 2. The major fatty relation of 0.77. The division of this species did not
acids have 16 or 18 carbon atoms with a variable show any correlation with taxonomical or tech-
degree of unsaturation. Primarily the identified yeast nological characteristics such as strain origin or
strains were divided into three groups according to resistance to preservatives (unpublished results).
the composition of the acids with 18 carbon atoms: Further increases in the number of clusters although
(i) group I, including species without C18:2 and improving the inertia relation do not present any
C18:3 acids, such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae, advantages in species differentiation (results not
Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Saccharomycodes shown).
ludwigii; (ii) group II, including species without The three species of group III were separated into
C18:3 acid, such as Zygosaccharomyces bailii and three distinct clusters with an inertia relation of 0.47.
Brettanomyces /Dekkera spp. ; (iii) group III, includ- The increase to four (0.64 of inertia relation) and five
ing species with C18:3 acid, such as Pichia mem- clusters (0.78 of inertia relation) was achieved by
branaefaciens, Pichia anomala and Lodderomyces splitting the Pichia membranaefaciens cluster. The
elongisporus. Then each group was subjected to a significant increase in the value of the inertia relation
principal component analysis (PCA) the graphical may be regarded as an indicator of the heterogeneity
results of which are shown in Fig. 1 (group I), Fig. 2 of this species. The division of this species did not
(group II) and Fig. 3 (group III). The PCA was indicate any apparent technological meaning.
performed using the most significant fatty acids (C A survey of yeast contaminants was performed in
16:0, C 16:1, C 18:0, C 18:1, C 18:2 and C 18:3) the a wine bottling plant in order to trace the source of
variability coefficient of which was less than 10%. the strain responsible for the formation of sediments
For each group the number of initial clusters was in bottled wine (strains from plant A, Table 1). The
established as equal to the number of species tested, microbiological analysis showed that yeast contami-
then the number of clusters was increased to assess nants were present all over the bottling line. The
the statistical stability of each partition. fatty acid profiles of these isolates were determined
The three species from group I were clearly (Table 2). The visual comparison and PCA (Fig. 2)
separated into three clusters with an inertia relation of fatty acid profiles indicated that the source of
of 0.73. If an increase in the number of clusters is contamination was situated at the outlet of the
performed by the PCA the Saccharomyces cerevisiae finishing filter before the filler. One strain isolated
var bayanus strains (ISA 1028, ISA 1029 and ISA from this source (number 41) was similar to those
1198) are separated from the other Saccharomyces isolated from the newly bottled wine (ISA 1430) and
cerevisiae strains and gathered in an additional from sediments from wine bottled two months earlier
cluster. This partition into four clusters had an inertia (ISA 1432 and ISA 1433) and from wine stored for
relation of 0.89. The division into five clusters four months (ISA 1431). They shared a common
increased the inertia relation to 0.92, the new cluster fatty acid profile which seemed to be of
being formed only by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Zygosaccharomyces bailii. Later identification by
type strain (ISA 1197). A possible partition into six conventional methodology confirmed this hypohesis.
clusters did not significantly increase the inertia Another strain (ISA 1429) with a different fatty acid
relation (0.93) and the new cluster obtained by profile was isolated from the newly bottled wine but
150 M. Malfeito-Ferreira et al. / International Journal of Food Microbiology 38 (1997) 143 – 155

Fig. 1. Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Yeast strains without polyunsaturated C 18 fatty acids. The strains are grouped in three (solid
line), four (dashed line) or five clusters (dotted line). Cluster I, Saccharomycodes ludwigii; cluster II, Schizosaccharomyces pombe and
cluster III, Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. (Yeasts are numbered according to , TBLR . 1 , / TBLR . .)
M. Malfeito-Ferreira et al. / International Journal of Food Microbiology 38 (1997) 143 – 155 151

Fig. 2. Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Yeast strains without C 18:3 fatty acid. The strains are grouped in two (solid line) and three
clusters (dashed line). The 0035, 0037, 0040 and 0042 strains are the same as the ISA 1430, ISA 1431, ISA 1432 and ISA 1433 strains,
respectively. The 1146 and 1328 strains are covered by 1147 and 1327 strains. Cluster I, Brettanomyces /Dekkera spp. and cluster II,
Zygosaccharomyces bailii strains. (Yeasts are numbered according to , TBLR . 1 , / TBLR . .)
152 M. Malfeito-Ferreira et al. / International Journal of Food Microbiology 38 (1997) 143 – 155

Fig. 3. Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Yeast strains with C 18:3 fatty acid. The strains are grouped in three (solid line), four (dashed
line) or five clusters (dotted line). The 0010, 0012, 0014, 0017 and 0022 strains are the same as the ISA 1420, ISA 1421, ISA 1422, ISA
1423 and ISA 1424 strains, respectively. Cluster I, Lodderomyces elongisporus; cluster II, Pichia anomala and cluster III, Pichia
membranaefaciens strains. (Yeasts are numbered according to , TBLR . 1 , / TBLR . .)
M. Malfeito-Ferreira et al. / International Journal of Food Microbiology 38 (1997) 143 – 155 153

it was not found in the sediments of the wine after sis. Several species are heterogenous as regards their
several months of storage indicating that it could not fatty acid composition. This was the case of Pichia
survive in such environmental conditions. The prob- membranaefaciens and Zygosaccharomyces rouxii.
able origin of this strain was in the filler (ISA 1424) In spite of this heterogeneity the former species
and at the filter inlet (strain 31) and the fatty acid could be distinguished from the others because the
composition of both was similar to Pichia mem- clusters given by PCA did not present strains from
branaefaciens. This possibility of identification as other species. Noronha-da-Costa et al. (1996) sug-
Pichia membranaefaciens was also confirmed by gested that the heterogeneity of Pichia mem-
conventional methodology. All other isolates from branaefaciens may be related with the inconsistency
the bottling plant were not found in bottled wine of the identification given by conventional method-
indicating, in case they contaminate wine, their ologies when compared with either fatty acid profiles
inability to grow under such conditions for they lose or DNA homology with the respective type strain.
their viability immediately after coming into contact On the contrary, Zygosaccharomyces rouxii strains
with wine. Some of these isolates were also conven- were included in the clusters of Saccharomyces
tionally identified. One strain isolated from the filler cerevisiae, Zygosaccharomyces bailii and Pichia
(ISA 1420) had a fatty acid profile similar to Pichia membranaefaciens. This observation may indicate
anomala and was identified as such. Two other that conventional procedures lead to misidentification
strains isolated from the filler showed an unusual of Zygosaccharomyces rouxii strains. In fact ISA
spore shape and were identified as Lodderomyces 1188, ISA 1194 and ISA 1322 strains which were
elongisporus (ISA 1421 and ISA 1422). Their fatty clustered together with Saccharomyces cerevisiae
acid profile was quite distinct from all other isolates. (see Fig. 1), Zygosaccharomyces bailii (see Fig. 2)
A survey of another bottling line (strains in plant and Pichia membranaefaciens (see Fig. 3), respec-
B, Table 1) revealed that final product contamination tively, did not hybridize with the respective type
was due to strains of Pichia membranaefaciens (ISA strain (unpublished results). Thus, from the four
1404) which were also recovered from the filling strains of Zygosaccharomyces rouxii analysed only
machine (ISA 1399, ISA 1400, ISA 1401 and ISA ISA 1220 was confirmed as such and clustered
1403). together with Zygosaccharomyces bailii. However,
Other strains occasionally isolated from spoiled the number of strains analysed should be increased to
wines or from winery equipment were conventional- confirm these results.
ly identified to check if they corresponded to the The differentiating ability of the technique proved
species to be expected after fatty acid profiling. In adequate for the characterization of yeasts associated
fact the identity of the ISA 1307 strain was con- with the wine industry for it was possible to dis-
firmed as Zyosaccharomyces bailii while ISA 1239 tinguish strains with different abilities to spoil wine
and ISA 1241 strains were Pichia membranaefa- and to trace back contaminants of final products. In
ciens. ISA 1327 and ISA 1328 strains isolated from practical terms the results can be obtained within two
spoiled sparkling wine showed profiles which were days after yeast isolation and purification. It may
distinct from all the other strains and were identified take longer if strain purification is required or if slow
later as Dekkera bruxellensis. growing species such as Brettanomyces /Dekkera are
to be analysed.
Although the medium and growth conditions were
4. Discussion different from other studies, the fatty acid com-
positions of Zygosaccharomyces bailii, Pichia mem-
Strains from the conventionally identified Sac- branaefaciens, Pichia anomala, Lodderomyces elon-
charomyces cerevisiae, Zygosaccharomyces bailii, gisporus, Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Sac-
Saccharomycodes ludwigii, Schizosaccharomyces charomycodes ludwigii strains analysed were similar,
pombe, Brettanomyces /Dekkera spp., Pichia in relative terms, to those of the same species
anomala, Pichia membranaefaciens and Lod- reported in the literature (Rattray, 1988; Tredoux et
deromyces elongisporus species presented distinct al., 1987; Viljoen et al., 1988; Jeffery et al., 1995).
fatty acid profiles after multivariate statistical analy- This similarity might be somewhat unexpected be-
154 M. Malfeito-Ferreira et al. / International Journal of Food Microbiology 38 (1997) 143 – 155

cause of the well known dependence of fatty acid garded as indicating lack of proper sanitation or of
compositions on growth conditions. However, other operating efficiency.
authors have reported that under certain conditions
fatty acid profiles do not vary or that the degree of
variation is species or strain dependent (Johnson et
Acknowledgements
al., 1972; Suutari et al., 1990). Unpublished results
from our laboratory concur with these observations.
We are indebted to Professor I. Spencer Martins
Probably the alteration of cellular fatty acid com-
for allowing the conventional identification of yeast
position is only significant when there are consider-
strains to be carried out at the Gulbenkian Institute of
able variations in environmental conditions. How-
Science, Oeiras, Portugal. This work was partially
ever, for an accurate comparison of fatty acid
funded by the EU project AIR-2-CT93-830.
profiles, biomass must be grown under the same
environmental conditions. For this the use of a solid
medium for yeast growth, as it is currently referred
for bacterial analysis (e.g. Bousfield et al., 1983; References
Decallonne et al., 1991; Svetashev et al., 1995),
proved to be a suitable mean of decreasing analysis Abel, K., Schmertzing, H., Peterson, J., 1963. Classification of
time and simultaneously of simplifying extraction microorganisms by analysis of chemical composition. 1.
procedures by avoiding the washing and centrifuga- Feasibility of utilizing gas chromatography. J. Bacteriol. 83,
1039–1044.
tion of the cells which may also contribute to the
Augustyn, O.P.H., Kock, J.L.F., 1989. Differentiation of yeast
appearance of artifacts (Ratledge and Evans, 1989). species and strains within a species by cellular fatty acid
Guerzoni et al. (1993) showed that fatty acid analysis. 1. Application of an adapted technique to differen-
composition could be correlated with strain origin or tiate between strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Mi-
resistance to thermal stress. However, the division of crobiol. Meth. 10, 9–23.
Barnett, J.A., Payne, R.W., Yarrow, D., 1983. Yeasts, characteris-
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Zygosaccharomyces bailii
tics and identification. Cambridge University Press, Cam-
and Pichia membranaefaciens observed could not be bridge.
related to strain origin or tolerance to sulphur dioxide Botha, A., Kock, J.L.F., 1993. Application of fatty acid profiles in
or sorbic acid (unpublished results). the identification of yeasts. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 19, 35–51.
The use of fatty acid profiling may separate Bousfield, I.J., Smith, G.L., Dando, T.R., Hobbs, G., 1983.
species according to their spoilage potential. This Numerical analysis of total fatty acid profiles in the identifica-
tion of coryneform, nocardioform and some other bacteria. J.
possibility has already been suggested by Botha and Gen. Microbiol. 129, 375–394.
Kock (1993) to monitor fungal contamination in Decallonne, J., Delmee,´ M., Wauthoz, P., Lioui, M., Lambert, R.,
bioprotein production. In the wine industry the most 1991. A rapid procedure for identification of lactic acid
potential spoilage yeasts would be indicated by bacteria based on the gas chromatographic analysis of the
significant amounts of C18:1 and C18:2 and by the cellular fatty acid. J. Food Prot. 54, 217–224.
Fleet, G., 1992. Spoilage yeasts. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 12, 1–14.
absence of C 18:3, because it corresponds to
Guerzoni, M.E., Sinigaglia, M., Gardini, F., 1993. Interaction
Zygosaccharomyces spp. In fact unpublished results between isolation source, yeast fatty acid composition and
from our laboratory revealed that several samples of stress tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its sub-
spoiled bottled wine with levels as high as 60 ppm of species. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 75, 588–594.
free sulphur dioxide and pH 3.3, contained sediments Jeffery, J., Kock, J.L.F., Botha, A., Coetzee, D.J., Botes, P.J.,
1995. Changes in lipid composition over the growth cycle of
due solely to growth of Zygosaccharomyces bailii.
Schizosaccharomyces pombe CBS 356T. Syst. Appl. Mi-
The absence of polyunsaturated C 18 acids would be crobiol. 18, 335–337.
an indicator of the presence of Saccharomyces Johnson, B., Nelson, S.J., Brown, C.M., 1972. Influence of
cerevisiae or of other contamination species such as glucose concentration on the physiology and lipid composition
Schizosaccharomyces pombe or Saccharomycodes of some yeasts. Antoine van Leeuwenhoek 38, 129–136.
Kock, J.L.F., Botes, P.J., Erasmus, S.C., Lategan, P.M., 1985. A
ludwigii. The presence of C18:2 and C18:3 reflects
rapid method to differentiate between four species of the
the presence of yeasts like Pichia membranaefaciens Endomycetaceae. J. Gen. Microbiol. 131, 3393–3396.
and Pichia anomala associated with poor hygiene or Kreger-van Rij, N.J.W., (Ed.), 1984. The Yeasts, a taxonomic
insufficient use of preservatives and could be re- study (3rd ed.). Elsevier Science Publisher, B.V., Amsterdam.
M. Malfeito-Ferreira et al. / International Journal of Food Microbiology 38 (1997) 143 – 155 155

Lebart, L., Morineau, A., Warwick, R., 1984. Multivariate descrip- 1988. Taxonomic Relationships of Cryptococcus and Tremella
tive statistical analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York. Based on Fatty Acid Composition and Other Phenotypic
Loureiro, V., Malfeito-Ferreira, M., 1993. Yeasts in food spoilage. Characters. J. Gen. Microbiol. 134, 2849–2855.
In: Macrae, R., Robinson, R.K., Sadler, M.J., (Eds.), En- Suutari, M., Liukkonem, K., Laakso, S., 1990. Temperature
cyclopaedia of Food Science, Technology and Nutrition (Vol. adaptation in yeasts: the role of fatty acids. J. Gen. Microbiol.
7). Academic Press, London, pp. 4344–4349. 136, 1469–1474.
Malfeito-Ferreira, M., St. Aubyn, A., Loureiro, V., 1989. The Svetashev, V., Vysotskii, V., Ipanova, E.P., Mikhailov, V.V., 1995.
long-chain fatty acid composition as a tool for differentiating Cellular fatty acids of Alteromonas species. Syst. Appl.
spoilage wine yeasts. Mycotaxon 36, 35–42. Microbiol. 18, 37–43.
Moreira-da-Silva, M., Malfeito-Ferreira, M., St. Aubyn, A., Tredoux, H.G., Kock, J.L.F., Lategan, P.M., 1987. The use of
Loureiro, V., 1994. Long-chain fatty acid composition as a cellular long-chain fatty acid composition in the identification
criterion for yeast distinction in the brewing industry. J. Inst. of some yeasts associated with the wine industry. Syst. Appl.
Brew. 100, 17–22. Microbiol. 9, 299–306.
Noronha-da-Costa, P., Rodrigues, C., Spencer-Martins, I., Van der Vossen, J.M., Hofstra, H., 1996. DNA based typing,
Loureiro, V., 1996. Fatty acid patterns of film forming yeasts identification and detection systems for food spoilage micro-
and new evidence for the heterogeneity of Pichia mem- organisms: development and implementation. Int. J. Food
branaefaciens. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 23, 79–84. Microbiol. 33, 35–49.
Ratledge, C., Evans, C.T., 1989. Lipids and their metabolism. In: Viljoen, B.C., Kock, J.L.F., Britz, T.J., 1988. The significance of
Rose, A.H., Harrison, J.S., (Eds.), The Yeasts (Vol. 3, Ch. 10). long-chain fatty acid composition and other phenotypic
Academic Press, London, pp. 367–444. characteristics in determining relationships among some Pich-
Rattray, J.B.M., 1988. Yeasts. In: Ratledge, C., Wilkinson, S.G. ia and Candida species. J. Gen. Microbiol. 134, 1893–1899.
(Eds.), Microbial Lipids (Vol. 1). Academic Press, London, Viljoen, B.C., Dykes, G.A., Callis, M., von Holy, A., 1993. Yeasts
pp. 555–697. associated with Vienna sausage packaging. Int. J. Food Mi-
Smit, E.J., Kock, J.L.F., van der Westhuizen, J.P.J., Britz, T.J., crobiol. 18, 53–62.

View publication stats

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen