Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Intelligent Compaction…
ACEplus-GPS-Receiver
ACEplus ACEplus-Display
ACEplus Drum
ACEplus
• Stiffness kB [MN/m]
• Number of Passes
• Process-Improvement
ACE-Display
• Material Preselection
• Compaction Values
Drum
• Amplitude changes stepless
• variable Frequency
ACEplus
• stiffness, Temperature
• number of passes
• process-improvement
ACE-Display
• material preselection
• compaction values
M100
Brake
• Asphalt Temperature
ΔT
Asphalt Surface Temperature T
FS
Temperature Ramp ΔT
Drum (splitted)
Upper Temperature Limit for Compaction To
M100
Brake
• amplitude changes stepless
0
Tu To • variable frequency
Lower Temperature Limit for Compaction Tu
References (I)
[1] Asphalt Institute Soils Manual; Chapter VIII: Bearing Plate Determination (Plate Bearing Test)
pp. 93-110, Asphalt Institute, Manual Series No. 10 (MS-10), 5th Edition, Lexington KY
[3] Asphalte Institute The Asphalt Handbook; Chapter 7: Compacting Hot-Mix Asphalt, pp. 283-307
Asphalt Institute, Manual Series No. 4 (MS-4), Edition 1989
[4] Anderegg & Kaufmann Intelligent Compaction with Vibratory Rollers – Feedback Control Systems in Automatic Compaction
and Compaction Control; Journal of the Transportation Research Board (TRB), Soil Mechanics 2004
No. 1868, pp. 124-134, Washington D. C. 2004
[5] Anderegg, von Felten Compaction Monitoring using Intelligent Soil Compactors; Presentation and Proceedings ASCE
& Kaufmann GeoCongress 2006, Atlanta February 2006
[6] Mike Mooney, R. Rinehart The Influence of Heterogeneity on Vibratory Roller Compactor Response
Presentation and Proceedings ASCE, GeoCongress 2006, Atlanta February 2006
[7] Mike Mooney, R. Rinehart Field Monitoring of Roller Vibration during Compaction of Subgrade Soil
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE 2007
[8] David White Field Validation of Intelligent Compaction Monitoring Technology for Unbound Materials
and hot Mix Asphalts; Interim Project Report, TH14 Janesville MN, 10/28 – 7/11 2005
CTRE, Iowa State University, Ames IA March 2006
[9] C. K. Su The new Age of Rolling – The North Carolina Experience; IC Strategic Meeting, Aubrun AL, 2004
References (II)
[10] Preisig, Noesberger Continuous Compaction Control based on Geotechnical Parameters
Dr. Caprez, Prof. Amann Forschungsauftrag VSS 2000/353; Federal Institute of Technology ETH, Zurich 2006
R. Anderegg
[11] Preisig, Dr. Caprez Validation of Continuous Compaction Control (CCC) Methods
& Prof. Amann Paper and Presentation: 9/23/2003; Workshop on Soil Compaction
Technical University of Hamburg-Harburg, Germany
[12] Kuno Kaufmann Higher Compaction Performance using two Excitation Frequencies
Master Thesis (MSc.), in German with an English Abstract
Bern University of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Information Technology
Burgdorf (Switzerland) 2006
[13] A. Teferra, E. Schultze Formulae, Charts and Tables – Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineerings
Stresses in Soils
A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam & Brookfield 1998
Excitation
Excentricity %
A
Differential Gear Box
c
oni
ctr
Ele vic
e
De Accelerationsensor
f
f opt.
Unit
Exciter Position
Exciter Position Rotationsensor
Drum Acceleration
Drum Acceleration
Phase Angle
Sensors
Frequency Amplitude
Speed
Automatically
Controlled
Roller
Parameter
Contact force
Control Compaction
Soil Stiffness
FS
x x
ϕ
FS kS cS
FS(x`=0, x``>0)
ϕ kS =
x
ϕ=90°: Resonance
f kS Target
FS
Loam Gravel
High
High
Amplitude
Amplitude
Low
Low
Frequency Frequency
Low High Low High
Drum
Continuously changement
of the amplitude
1-Amplitude
Compaction/Soil Stiffness
Compaction Depth
Number of Passes/Time
Frame mfg
FZ
FS =-mdxd``+FZcos(Ωt)+(mf+md)g
FS FZ=mereΩ2 ; Ω=2πφ ; xd``=d2xd/dt2
FS>0: xd=xS=x
Contact Conditions:
FS =0: xd>xS
FS FS =kSxS+cSxS`
Soil
xS
( ) ( )
md &x&d + FB + cG x& d − x& f + k G x d − x f = mu ru Ω cos(Ω ⋅ t ) + md g
2
( ) ( )
m f &x& f + cG x& f − x& d + k G x f − x d = m f g kS cS
FB = cB x& d + k B x if FB > 0
Simulation-Model
FB = 0 else Force-Driven Nonlinearity
FS,max FS,max
FS (mf+md)g FS (mf+md)g FS (mf+md)g
loss of
t Period T t t
Period T = 1/f contact Period 2T (Period Doubling)
FS,max < 2(mf+md)g : permanent Contact FS,max > 2(mf+md)g : periodic Loss of Contact FS,max > 2(mf+md)g : double Amplitude, Bouncing
7 t
6 10 kg m Period T
5 Deflection
x& d 4
3 Ω t
2
1 FZ Period T
0 kB cB
Period 2T
Amplitude A1 [mm] 8
xd FFT
7
A1/2 [mm] 6 A1/4
Deflection; Time nT
5 7.2 kg m
A1/3 [mm] 4
3 A1/2 A1
2
A2/3 [mm] 1 Poor Compaction, kB Compacted f/4 f/2 f=1/T
0
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
xS
Measuring the
Deflection
FS FS=kBxS+cSxS
Mechanistic Soil model: `
xS
FS
Stiffness of Soil: kB= kB cS
xS
2.5 g
Ω
Ω
Ω
Deformation 5.0 g
Depth 20 cm
Soil-Measurement
Device
Depth 40 cm
Soil-Measurement
Device
Depth 80 cm
Soil-Measurement
Device Depth
ME kB
AdequateTesting
Adequate Testing
SN 670 317 b
FS FS =kS(A)xS+cS(A)xS`
Layered Soil Measurement [4]
xS
kS(A) cS(A)
Amplitude A0 [mm]
Layered Soils
- Odemark (1946)
0.8
Measuringinto
intothe
theSubgrade
Subgrade
Measuring
Measuringthe
theLayer
Layer
Measuring
Roller: Stiffness kB
Optimal
Water
60 Content 20
19
50
Modulus (Stiffness) kN/m
30 16
15
20
14
10
13
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Fine Material: Loam
Water Content %
DRY WET
Constant Weight, shrinking Volume => Increasing Unit Weight, increasing Compaction
Constant Weight, shrinking Volume => Increasing Unit Weight, increasing Compaction
Stiffness kB
&
Continuous
Compaction
Stiffness-Data 1 Hertz
Control
Actuators
Sensors
Soil-Drum-Interaction
GPS – Satellite
GPS
reference point
Stiffness kB
none
10 MN/m
140 MN/m
backward
PASS 4
ACEplus: Counting PASS 3
the Passes PASS 2
PASS 1
forward
PASS 3
PASS 2
PASS 1
backward 5. Pass
5. Pass
PASS 2 4. Pass
PASS 1
3. Pass
forward 2. Pass
PASS 1 1. Pass
backward
s 3
Pas
forward
s 2
Pas
backward
s 1
Pas
forward
Stiffness kB
Pass 4
Pass 3
forward
4. Pass kB
- MINUS
backward
3. Pass kB
VariationofofCompaction
Compactionbetween
betweenpasses
passes
Variation
↑↑↑↑
↑↑
= EQUAL
Stiffness ΔkB
Difference of
ΔkB=0
↓↓
=
↓↓↓↓
Variation ΔkB
forward
70 MN/m 2. Pass kB
2. Pass ΔkB
140 MN/m
more Passes
ΔStiffness ΔkB:
↑↑↑↑ forward 9 O. K.
last Pass kB
↑↑
ΔkB=0
last Pass ΔkB
↓↓
↓↓↓↓
forward
70 MN/m 2. Pass kB
2. Pass ΔkB
140 MN/m
more Passes
ΔStiffness ΔkB:
↓↓↓↓
Subgarde: Pipeline
Cover Material stays soft
Position (Satellite)
Correlation [10]
- Single Drum Roller with GPS Position
Ausschnitt
- Plate Bearing Test [1] with GPS Position
Lastplatten-Messpunkt
ME-38
2
120000 R = 0.751
100000
kB [kN/m]
⎡ MN ⎤ ⎡ MN ⎤
⎥ = 0.8 ⋅ M E1 ⎢ m 2 ⎥ + 11.3
80000 kB ⎢
60000
⎣ m ⎦ ⎣ ⎦
40000
20000 - Soft Subsoil
0
0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000 - one Layer of well graded Material
ME1 [kN/m 2]
1. Optimized/Maximized Productivity
- Feedback Control System: Automatic Adjustment
of Compaction Energy (Amplitude, Frequency, Impact Spacing)
- Process-Integrated Measurement of Soil Stiffness
=> Easy to operate
2. Sustainable Compaction
- Homogeneous, optimal Compaction Results
- Continuous Compaction Control (GPS)