Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1
Paul N. Philips, Esq., SBN 187928
e-mail: pnp@pnplegal.com
2 Samantha E. Mirabello, Esq., SBN 325827
3 e-mail: sm@pnplegal.com
LAW OFFICES OF PAUL N. PHILIPS, APLC
4
468 North Camden Drive, Suite 200
5 Beverly Hills, California 90210
6
Telephone: (323) 813-1126
Facsimile: (310) 854-6902
7
11
12
MICHAEL STOKES, MICHAEL ) CASE NO.:
13 STOKES A/K/A MIKE STOKES )
A/K/A MICHAEL STOKES D/B/A ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES;
14
WILLOW GIRL MUSIC A/K/A ) DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY
15 MICHAEL STOKES D/B/A )
16
SKYTOWER MUSIC, ) 1. COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
) 2. CONVERSION
17
Plaintiff, ) 3. INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE
18 ) WITH PROSPECTIVE ECONOMIC
v. ) ADVANTAGE
19
) 4. UNFAIR BUSINESS PRACTICES
20 UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, ) [CAL. BUS. & PROF. CODE §17200]
21
INC.; UNIVERSAL MUSIC ) 5. UNJUST ENRICHMENT
DISTRIBUTION; UMG ) 6. FINANCIAL ELDER ABUSE
22 RECORDINGS, INC.; CONCORD ) [CAL. WELFARE & INSTITUTIONS
23 MUSIC GROUP, INC.; CONCORD ) CODE §15610.30]
MUSIC PUBLISHING; CRAFT ) 7. ACCOUNTING
24
RECORDINGS; THE BICYCLE ) 8. DECLARATORY RELIEF
25 MUSIC COMPANY, INC.; BIKE )
26
MUSIC; KOBALT MUSIC )
PUBLISHING AMERICA, INC.; )
27 KOBALT MUSIC GROUP; )
28 KOBALT MUSIC SERVICES )
1
AMERICA, INC.; WARNER )
MUSIC GROUP; )
2 WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, )
3 INC.; SONY MUSIC )
ENTERTAINMENT; SONY/ATV )
4
MUSIC PUBLISHING GROUP, )
5 )
6
Defendants. )
)
7
8 COMES NOW Plaintiff MICHAEL STOKES (“Mr. Stokes”), and asserts his
9 Claims and Causes of Action against the parties named herein as Defendants as
10 follows:
LAW OFFICES OF PAUL N. PHILIPS, APLC
11 1. Mr. Stokes asserts the within claims against Universal Music Group, Inc.,
12 Universal Music Distribution, UMG Recordings, Inc. (collectively “ Defendants
13 Universal”), Concord Music Group, Inc., Concord Music Publishing, Craft Recordings
14 (collectively “Defendants Concord”), The Bicycle Music Company, Inc., Bike Music
15 (collectively “Defendants Bicycle”), Kobalt Music Publishing America, Inc., Kobalt
16 Music Group, Kobalt Music Services America, Inc. (collectively “Defendants
17 Kobalt”), Warner Music Group, Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. (collectively
18 “Defendants Warner”), Sony Music Entertainment, and Sony/ATV Music Publishing
19 Group (collectively “Defendants Sony”);
20 PARTIES
21 2. Mr. Stokes resides in the County of Los Angeles within the Central
22 District of the State of California;
23 3. Defendants Universal, Defendants Concord, Defendants Bicycle,
24 Defendants Kobalt, Defendants Warner, and Defendants Sony all maintain systematic
25 contacts with, and do substantial business in the County of Los Angeles, Central
26 District of the State of California;
27 ////
28 ////
2
11
12 as Michael Stokes, Mike Stokes, Michael Stokes d/b/a Willow Girl Music, and
13 Michael Stokes d/b/a Skytower Music;
14 7. Mr. Stokes has composed, written, produced, and arranged for world-
15 renowned acts including but not limited to Tina Turner, Whitney Houston, Prince,
16 Quincy Jones, Earth Wind & Fire, Merle Haggard, Color Me Bad, Mavis Staples, Patti
17 Labelle, Janet Jackson, Herb Alpert, Smokey Robinson, Booker T., Magic Lady, Little
18 Richard, Big Daddy Kane, Sticky Fingaz, Marilyn McCoo, Billy Davis, Jr., Morris
19 Day, Jesse Powell, Enchantment, and Keith Barrow, among others. In addition to his
20 vast musical pursuits, Mr. Stokes has also taken on active political and social roles,
21 including having been intimately involved in Nancy Reagan’s “Just Say No” anti-drug
22 campaign (having co-written the song “Stop the Madness”);
23 8. Works representing the original creation of Mr. Stokes have been released
24 on labels including but not limited to MCA Records, Columbia, A&M Records, Giant
25 Records, Paisley Park, Warner Bros. Records, Sussex, United Artists Records, Arista,
26 Motown, Atlantic, Capitol Records, Reprise Records, and Universal Records, and have
27 been widely distributed by numerous physical and digital distributors since the early
28 1970s;
3
1 9. Mr. Stokes’ original musical works have enjoyed massive success and
2 notoriety, and have been extensively sampled and otherwise licensed for use by several
3 popular artists. By way of example, artists whose works sample or otherwise use Mr.
4 Stokes’ creations include but are not limited to Rick Ross, Jay-Z, Ne-Yo, LL Cool J,
5 Kendrick Lamar, Wiz Khalifa, French Montana, The Game, G-Unit, and Lil’ Wayne;
6 10. In or about 2010, Mr. Stokes suffered a stroke that incapacitated him and
7 rendered him unable to manage or supervise the musical empire he had created over
8 the course of several decades. Specifically, his medical condition left him unable to
9 engage in the business of creating or monetizing music, and likewise unable to monitor
10 the various uses to which his musical works were being put. During the period of Mr.
Stokes’ incapacity as such, on information and belief, Mr. Stokes’ name was forged on
LAW OFFICES OF PAUL N. PHILIPS, APLC
11
12 several chain of title documents, his copyrights and related interests thereby being
13 effectively stolen from him, creating the false impression that Mr. Stokes’ copyrights
14 and attendant rights in his music catalogs had been transferred to the former Music
15 Publishing Company of America (hereafter “MPCA”);
16 11. On information and belief, MPCA thereafter sold, conveyed, or otherwise
17 transferred to Defendants Bicycle certain of their unlawfully-held rights in Mr. Stokes’
18 music catalogs, as identified at least in part by copyright registrations in the works set
19 forth in Exhibit A hereto. For some time thereafter, on information and belief,
20 Defendants Bicycle earned substantial income on copyright and attendant rights
21 Defendants Bicycle unlawfully held in those works. On further information and belief,
22 Defendants Bicycle were absorbed in some fashion by Defendants Kobalt and
23 Defendants Concord, which therefore also wrongfully earned substantial income on
24 copyright and attendants rights they unlawfully held in those works;
25 12. Defendants Universal, Defendants Warner, and Defendants Sony are
26 believed and alleged to have occupied, at all times herein relevant, distribution and/or
27 publishing relationships with certain of their co-Defendants, to wit, on information and
28 belief, Defendants Bicycle, Defendants Kobalt, and Defendants Concord. In the
4
11
12 anyone, Defendants have continued to accept income arising from Mr. Stokes’
13 interests, and have continued to make unlawful payments to their co-Defendants, and
14 not to Mr. Stokes;
15 13. As to Defendants Universal specifically, said Defendants not only
16 unlawfully made payments to their co-Defendants on Mr. Stokes’ copyright and
17 attendant interests, and not to Mr. Stokes, but Defendants Universal also actively
18 concealed from Mr. Stokes their actual knowledge that their co-Defendants were not
19 entitled to said payments, and that Mr. Stokes was the rightful owner of the subject
20 copyright interests and of all income interests arising therefrom. Only by reason of
21 accidental discovery, and to the chagrin of Defendants Universal, did Mr. Stokes learn
22 that Defendants Universal had been concealing from Mr. Stokes the known unlawful
23 nature of their payments to their co-Defendants;
24 14. On information and belief, all Defendants have in some manner
25 knowingly and willfully infringed upon Mr. Stokes’ copyright interests in his musical
26 works by misappropriating, unlawfully licensing, copying, selling, and otherwise
27 exploiting said works for their financial gain, all to Mr. Stokes’ damage;
28 15. As a result of the foregoing, Mr. Stokes has been severely damaged in his
5
1 pecuniary and other interests, and seeks, inter alia, an accounting of all sums accepted
2 and paid with any regard to his rightful copyright interests in his music catalog;
3 16. On information and belief, certain of the Defendants have conceded and
4 admitted their wrongdoing, but have still failed to compensate Mr. Stokes;
5 FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
6 COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
7 (As Against All Defendants)
8 17. Mr. Stokes incorporates paragraphs 1 through 16 above as though fully set
9 forth herein in form and substance;
10 18. The songs at issue herein have been duly registered with the U.S.
Copyright Office. Each such song is a work of original creative expression and
LAW OFFICES OF PAUL N. PHILIPS, APLC
11
12 constitutes all or in part the property of Mr. Stokes, and not rightfully the property of
13 the Defendants. All legal copies, or derivatives thereof, are produced either directly by
14 Mr. Stokes or, in the alternative, are under his authority or license. All such works
15 have been published in conformity with the provisions of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C.
16 § 101, et seq.;
17 19. Defendants had at all times herein relevant ready and easy access to Mr.
18 Stokes’ works as alleged herein;
19 20. Defendants have infringed upon Mr. Stokes’ copyright interests in works
20 of original expression as alleged herein by, inter alia, knowingly and willfully
21 misappropriating, unlawfully licensing, copying, selling, and otherwise exploiting said
22 works for their financial gain;
23 21. Defendants’ conduct infringes Mr. Stokes’ rights in direct violation of the
24 Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 101, et seq.;
25 22. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ wrongful acts alleged
26 above, Mr. Stokes has been damaged, and Defendants have been unjustly enriched, in
27 amounts to be determined at trial. Alternatively, Mr. Stokes may elect to seek
28 statutory damages of $150,000 per willful infringement pursuant to 17 U.S.C. §
6
1 504(c);
2 23. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ wrongful acts alleged
3 above, Mr. Stokes has suffered, and continues to suffer, irreparable harm and injury for
4 which there is no adequate remedy at law. Mr. Stokes is informed and believes, and
5 thereon alleges, that Defendants’ copyright infringement will continue unless enjoined
6 by this Court;
7 SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
8 CONVERSION
9 (As Against All Defendants)
10 24. Mr. Stokes incorporates paragraphs 1 through 23 as though fully set forth
herein in form and substance;
LAW OFFICES OF PAUL N. PHILIPS, APLC
11
12 25. Mr. Stokes had, at all times herein relevant, a right to possess those funds
13 and property in sums known to Defendants, who as of the filing hereof wrongfully
14 have and maintain such possession, and who wrongfully refuse to account to Mr.
15 Stokes as to the amounts unlawfully held and maintained;
16 26. Defendants, by reason of their wrongful conduct as alleged herein, have
17 intentionally and substantially interfered with Mr. Stokes’ right to possession by: (a)
18 taking funds and property from Mr. Stokes; (b) preventing Mr. Stokes from gaining
19 access to the funds and property, and (c) refusing to return said funds and property to
20 Mr. Stokes despite Mr. Stokes’ demand for the same;
21 27. At no time did Mr. Stokes consent to Defendants’ taking or their refusal to
22 return or grant Plaintiff access to the funds and property herein described, nor would
23 Plaintiff have ever so consented;
24 28. As a direct and proximate result of the conduct of Defendants as herein
25 alleged, all of which was a substantial factor in damaging Mr. Stokes, Mr. Stokes was
26 in fact damaged severely in sums according to proof at the time of trial;
27 29. The conduct of Defendants was knowing, willful, and purposefully
28 designed to damage and injure Mr. Stokes in his personal and business interests, and in
7
11
1 to disrupt Mr. Stokes’ economic relationships and his right and entitlement to earn an
2 income flowing from his rightful copyright interests in the songs at issue in this
3 litigation, including without limitation his right to form contracts for the use and
4 exploitation of the songs. In fact, Defendants knew that their conduct was virtually
5 certain to disrupt said relationships, and that said disruption was certain to cause
6 Plaintiff severe and permanent damage in his personal and other interests;
7 34. As a direct and proximate result of the conduct of Defendants as herein
8 alleged, all of which was a substantial factor in damaging Mr. Stokes, Mr. Stokes was
9 in fact damaged severely in sums according to proof at the time of trial;
10 35. The conduct of Defendants was knowing, willful, and purposefully
designed to damage and injure Mr. Stokes in his personal and business interests, and in
LAW OFFICES OF PAUL N. PHILIPS, APLC
11
11
12 40. Mr. Stokes incorporates paragraph 1 through 39 as though fully set forth
13 herein in form and substance;
14 41. Defendants were unjustly enriched by misappropriating Mr. Stokes’ work,
15 licensing the same for their own commercial gain, and, on information and belief,
16 unlawfully exploiting Mr. Stokes’ copyright and attendant interests;
17 42. Because it would be unjust for Defendants to retain any money derived
18 from the misappropriation of Mr. Stokes’ original works, Mr. Stokes is entitled to
19 disgorgement of all profits earned by Defendants and each of them by virtue of their
20 wrongful use and exploitation of said works;
21 SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION
22 FINANCIAL ELDER ABUSE (Cal. Welfare & Institutions Code §15610.30)
23 (As Against All Defendants)
24 43. Mr. Stokes incorporates paragraphs 1 through 42 as though fully set forth
25 herein in form and substance;
26 44. Mr. Stokes was at times herein relevant a person over 65 years of age
27 living in California, and therefore qualifies as an “elder” pursuant to California
28 Welfare & Institutions Code section 15610.27;
10
11
12 wrongfully direct to parties other than Mr. Stokes funds Defendants are aware belong
13 not to said parties but to Mr. Stokes;
14 46. By reason of the facts alleged herein, Defendants and each of them
15 secreted, appropriated, obtained, and/or retained property for a wrongful use aimed at
16 depriving Mr. Stokes of said property, all in violation of the law;
17 48. Defendants and each of them knew their conduct alleged herein was
18 wrongful and stood to substantially damage Mr. Stokes in his pecuniary and other
19 rights, while simultaneously earning Defendants substantial profits;
20 49. As a direct and proximate result of the conduct of Defendants and each of
21 them in violation of California Welfare & Institutions Code sections15610.30, et seq.,
22 Mr. Stokes has sustained severe financial and other damages in amounts according to
23 proof, including at least compensatory damages and attorney fees;
24 50. Defendants’ conduct as herein alleged was so depraved and malicious,
25 and so driven by Defendants’ desire to profit and to benefit themselves to the exclusion
26 of Plaintiff, and was so directed at damaging Plaintiff in his legal and other rights, as to
27 justify an award of an award of treble damages and/or an award of punitive damages
28 against Defendants and each of them in amounts sufficient to punish and make an
11
1 example of Defendants;
2 SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION
3 ACCOUNTING
4 (As Against All Defendants)
5 51. Mr. Stokes incorporates paragraphs 1 through 50 as though fully set forth
6 herein in form and substance;
7 52. At times herein relevant, Defendants and each of them have owed and still
8 owe Mr. Stokes certain income, including without limitation royalties and other funds,
9 based on Mr. Stokes’ ownership and other rights in the songs at issue herein.
10 Defendants and each of them maintain exclusive control of the sums collected, paid,
and owed to Plaintiff, and have denied Mr. Stokes access to an accounting of such
LAW OFFICES OF PAUL N. PHILIPS, APLC
11
12 funds. As such, the balance due Mr. Stokes can only be ascertained by an accounting;
13 EIGHTH CAUSE OF ACTION
14 DECLARATORY RELIEF
15 (As Against All Defendants)
16 53. Mr. Stokes incorporates paragraphs 1 through 52 as though fully set forth
17 herein in form and substance;
18 54. An actual and immediate controversy has arisen and now exists as
19 between Mr. Stokes and the Defendants regarding the ownership of and entitlement to
20 certain benefits derived from the copyright and other interests at issue as alleged
21 herein;
22 55. Mr. Stokes seeks judicial declarations of his rights in and to the songs at
23 issues herein, including without limitation ownership and income rights flowing from
24 the copyrights in the subject musical works;
25 56. The judicial declarations sought hereby are necessary and appropriate in
26 order that the parties may ascertain their legal rights and obligations to one another,
27 and also in order that they may avoid the hardships to be inflicted upon them by a
28 protracted legal dispute;
12
11
11
24
Dated: January 14, 2020 By: /s/ Paul N. Philips
PAUL N. PHILIPS, ESQ.
25 Attorneys for Plaintiff
26 MICHAEL STOKES
27 ////
28 ////
14
1 JURY DEMAND
2 Mr. Stokes hereby demands trial of the within action by jury.
3
7
Dated: January 14, 2020 By: /s/ Paul N. Philips
PAUL N. PHILIPS, ESQ.
8 Attorneys for Plaintiff
9 MICHAEL STOKES
10
LAW OFFICES OF PAUL N. PHILIPS, APLC
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
15
10
LAW OFFICES OF PAUL N. PHILIPS, APLC
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
EXHIBIT A
28
16
In compliance with the provisions of 17 U.S.C. 508, you are hereby advised that a court action or appeal has been filed
on the following copyright(s):
COURT NAME AND LOCATION
G
✔ ACTION G APPEAL
United States District Cout - Central District of California
DOCKET NO. DATE FILED
312 North Spring Street
1/14/2020 Los Angeles, California 90012
PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT
UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC.;
MICHAEL STOKES
(ADDITIONAL DEFENDANTS IDENTIFIED ON
ATTACHMENT "1" )
COPYRIGHT
TITLE OF WORK AUTHOR OR WORK
REGISTRATION NO.
3 PA0000087416 Are You Ready For Love Michael Stokes / Emanuel Johnson
3 .
In the above-entitled case, a final decision was rendered on the date entered below. A copy of the order or judgment
together with the written opinion, if any, of the court is attached.
COPY ATTACHED WRITTEN OPINION ATTACHED DATE RENDERED
1) Upon initiation of action, 2) Upon filing of document adding copyright(s), 3) Upon termination of action,
mail copy to Register of Copyrights mail copy to Register of Copyrights mail copy to Register of Copyrights
DISTRIBUTION:
4) In the event of an appeal, forward copy to Appellate Court 5) Case File Copy
Case 2:20-cv-00370 Document 1-1 Filed 01/14/20 Page 3 of 12 Page ID #:18
V3538D500,
V3511D402.)
9. Copyright number for Don’t Fight The Feeling Michael Stokes
individual title not
located.
(Located only
SR0000064149.)
10. Copyright number for Don’t Save Me Now Michael Stokes
individual title not
located.
(Located only
V3511D402,
V3477D502,
V3538D500.)
11. Copyright number for Everything But Fail Michael Stokes
individual title not
located.
(Located only
V3538D50,
V3538D502,
V3511D402.)
12. Copyright number for Expose Yourself Michael Stokes
individual title not
located.
(Located only
V3477D503,
V3477D502,
V3538D500,
V3538D502,
V3511D402.)
13. PA0000061696 Feeling Something Michael Stokes, Ronn
Matlock, et al.
14. Copyright number for Feel So Good Do It Michael Stokes
individual title not Again
located.
(Located only
V3477D502,
V3538D500,
V3511D402.)
Case 2:20-cv-00370 Document 1-1 Filed 01/14/20 Page 6 of 12 Page ID #:21
(Located only
V3477D503,
V3477D502,
V3538D501,
V3538D502,
V3511D404.)
59. PA0000008595 Silly Love Song Michael Stokes, Emanuel
Johnson
60. Copyright number for Slow Down Michael Stokes
individual title not
located.
(Located only
V3477D503,
V3477D502,
V3538D501,
V3538D502,
V3511D404.)
61. Copyright number for Somebody’s Loving You Michael Stokes
individual title not
located.
(Located only
SR0000064149.)
62. PA0000064799 Success Marvin Jones, Lynn
Smith
63. PA0000064797 Summer Nights Michael Stokes, Keith
Fondren
64. PA0000008589 Sunnyshine Feeling Michael Stokes, Verdell
Lanier
65. Copyright number for Sunshine Michael Stokes
individual title not
located.
(Located only
V3477D503,
V3477D502,
V3538D502,
V3538D501,
V3511D404.)
66. PA0001724974 Super High Michael Stokes, Emanuel
Johnson, et al.
Case 2:20-cv-00370 Document 1-1 Filed 01/14/20 Page 11 of 12 Page ID #:26