Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
SHORT ARTICLE
Table-1 :Computer and Internet use among the patients as well as practioners in the today's world cannot
students be denied. However, present study showed poor knowledge
Parameters Undergraduate Postgraduate p-value among the UG medical students regarding this (p<0.0001)
students students
n=200(%) n=100 (%)
(Table 1). The students and practitioners should know how
Computer Users 130(65%) 88(88%) 0.002 to do the literature search and how to extract the right
1. Self operated 110(55%) 35(35%) 0.044 information in this age of internet (5). Moreover, the health
2. Assisted 20 (10%) 53(53%) <0.0001
and financial resources in developing countries like India
Purpose for using
computer are limited and unevenly distributed. In addition, geographic
1. To get general 84 (42%) 24(24%) 0.062 and socioeconomic factors prevent transfer of rapid
information
2. For thesis or research -- 80(80%) – information between patients and healthcare providers.
work By the use of telemedicine, through broadband high
3. For entertainment 104 (52%) 22(22%) 0.0002
4. Any other 24(12%) 42(42%) 0.31 capacity network connections, we can cross these barriers
Place where used to provide timely medical care in the remotest corner of the
1. Home 48(24%) 46(46%) 0.013 country (6). To achieve this it is important for the
2. College 10(05%) 25(25%) <0.0001
3. Cyber café 52(26%) 54(54%) 0.0009 practitioners to have ample knowledge of computers
4. Anyother 22(11%) 4(4%) 0.31
and internet.
Preferred medium for
information To conclude, we can say that to meet the need of
1. Journals/library 12(6%) 36(36%) <0.0001
2. Textbooks 150(75%) 35(35%) <0.0001
increased computer and internet use among health care
3. Internet 24(14%) 84(84%) <0.0001 professionals, it is urgently required to introduce short
4. Pharmacopeia 10(5%) 15(15%) 0.13
5. Any other – – –
refresher courses in computer application and internet
Reason for preferring use both among UG and PG students.UG and PG students
internet should be trained to extract valuable information from
1. Time saving 28(14%) 64(64%) <0.0001
2. Latest knowledge 20(10%) 75(75%) <0.0001 the special medical web sites and should be encouraged
3. Easy accessibility 8(4%) 44(44%) <0.0001 to check the authenticity of information by correlating
4. Nonspecific – 2(2%) 0.56
with existing evidences. This will be helpful in promoting
Internet used to know-
1. About drugs 6(3%) 30(30%) <0.0001 evidence based learning.
2. Rational prescribing 10(5%) 25(25%) 0.001
3. Therapeutic guidelines 20(10%) 40(40%) <0.0001 References
4. Rescent advances in 16(8%) 80(80%) <0.0001
1. Hirschman L, Morgan AA, Yeh AS. Rutabag a by any
Knowledge about name: Extracting biological names. J Biomed Inform
telemedicine 48(24%) 95(95%) <0.0001 2002 ; 35 : 247-59.
Knowledge about evidence 16(8%) 88(88%) <0.0001
based medicine
2. Yadav H, Jain S, Kapila S, Prasad G. Internet resources for
diabetes. Ind J Med Sci 2005 ; 59 (1) : 32-42.
Commonly assessed
web sites 3. Brewer G, Hiscock D. Medical education and practice in the
1. www.Google.com 24(14%) 80(80%) <0.0001 information age. Postgrad Med J 2001 ; 77 : 425-27.
2. www.yahoo.com 20(10%) 60(60%) <0.0001
3. www.rediff.com 8(4%) 44(44%) <0.0001 4. Wiecha JM. Collaborative online learning (COL): A new
4. www.indiatimes.com 1(0.5%) 10(10%) 0.02 distance education method. Essential Drug Monitor
5. specific journal site – 80(80%) – 2003 ; 33 : 36.
6. pubmed – 45(45%) –
7. any other – 16(16%) – 5. Gitanjali B. Identifying a research topic:The problem is the
problem. Ind J Pharmacol 2005 ; 37 : 67-68.
n=number, %=percentage
6. Singh M, Khandheria BK, Gura GM, Rihal CS. Telemedicine
The potential of telemedicine and evidence based links between developing and developed nations. Ind
medicine in providing the much needed information to Heart J 2003 ; 55 : 188-92.