Title of the Article Commented [r1]: The title should represent the written

problems contains no more 12 word, while show two or more

Subtitles of the Article (if any) complex variables are required. The font of this section initially has
employed adobe garamond 14 pt.
Commented [r2]: Subtitles represents detail information
elucidating the title.

Author(s) Commented [r3]: Author(s) name, without academic degree.

Author’s Affiliation Name must not be a pen name, yet full name. The font of this
section initially has employed adobe garamond pro 10 pt.
Commented [r4]: Author’s affiliation in detail information such
where the author department from, the faculty, and
university/institute/research center. The same standard of writing
Abstract should be applied for those articles written by more one author.
Abstract must strictly be written around 150-250 words. The first sentence discusses on the background of the research The font of this section initially has employed adobe garamond pro
9 pt.
problems. Following the discussion, the second sentence tells about aims of the study and the research focus. Method of
how the data gathered should be written in the next sentence, including the material object used in the research. It would
be in detail more information if the author used quantitative data. The findings may be written in two or three following
sentences. The last sentence mentions what contribution the research to the relate discipline.

Keywords : written in five maximum salient concepts that explain the main ideas of the article.

These paragraphs systematically introduce the research background. There are two ways to Commented [r5]: The font of this section initially has employed
adobe garamond pro 12 pt.
display the background; the first is to show the research context: why does the issue appear and
what does the research gap that produce the problem. The writer may also provide novelty of the
research by mapping out prior research. Research question may explicitly appear in this subsection,
while thesis argument must be clearly mentioned also in these paragraphs.

Subheading (Context/Method if any ) Commented [r6]: Subheading written without number

In this subheading, the writer may describe the the context of discourse in detail. It may
problematize the main concept discussing in the research writing. However, it is important to note,
this subsection does not provide such theoretical framework. While at the same time, this subsection
may provide method of gathering and analyzing data for which the data would be possible to
conduct qualitative or quantitative approaches.

Subheading (The result)

This subsection shows the findings of the research. The data do not display in the form of its
raw materials; yet it may discuss with such relate references. The writer may provide table, however
it must explain in detail what the table mean to be. Please to not display many tables without any
explanation about it.

Subheading (Discussion)
 If the discussion put in separable section, please discuss the findings with putting the data in
the today’s discourse. The writer would be suggested to analyze two or more complex variable and
then in this section the findings would be reflected and refracted with the current variables.
Contribution to the field may also clearly recommend in this subsection.

Subheading (Conclusion)
Conclusion contains such kind of summary of the research problem and its findings. The
writer may recommend for the next researcher to discuss and debate in missing discussion of this
research.
 References Commented [r7]: References uses EndNote/Mendeley citation
manager

Achsien Iggi H. (2003), Investasi Syari’ah di Pasar Modal: Menggagas Konsep dan Praktek
Manajemen Portofolio. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.