Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Plaintiff, ‘
V.
AMENDED COMPLAINT
Plaintiff, FREDRICK JAMES, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, by and
through its undersigned counsel, hereby sues Defendants, RONALD D. EDWARDS, and
1. This is an action for recovery of money damages afid permanent injunctive relief
resulting from Defendant Edwards’ indebtedness to Plaintiff and, after Plaintiff requested
and actions to conspire With Defendant John Does 1—3 _to publish false afid defamatory statements
Plaintiff s reputation.
2. As a direct result of Defendant’s actions, Plaintiff has suffered and will continue to
suffer substantial and irreparable damages, as further described herein as well-as harm and ‘flltUI‘G
‘
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
3. The amount in question exceeds $15,000, exclusive of costs, interest, and attorney’s
fees.
Page 1 of 12
***ELECTRONICALLY FILED 07/25/2018 07:11:55 PM: KEN BURKE, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, PINELLAS COUNTY***
4. Plaintiff, FREDRICK JAMES, LLC (“Fredrick James”), is a Florida limited liability
6. Plaintiff does not know the true names of capacities, Whether individual, associate,
corporate, or othefwise, of the Defendants sued herein as JOHN DOE 1-3 (the “Doe
Defgndants”), who published false and damaging Statémen’ts about Plaintiff using {he online
profile names, “Harlon Richards”, “Juan Capasso Pinto” and “Vince Patton” and Plaintiff
therefore sues the Defendants by such fictitious names. The Doe Defendants’ precise location
and actual identity are currently unknown to Plaintiff. Plaintiff will amend the Complaint to state
the true names and capacifies of the Doe Defendants once this. information is discovered.
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
8. Fredrick James is a Florida accounting firm providing accounting, tax and consulting
9. In May 2016, Edwards initially engaged the services of Fredrick James .to prepare his
2007 and 2008 income tax returns and, as necessary, communicate with taxing authqrities. For
those services, Fredfick James invoiced Edwards and those invoices were paid in full.
’10.
On May 24, 2017, Edwards met with Fredrick James’ employee Joe Dolan as
Edwards had been contactéd by an IRS Revenue Officer with regard to unfiled income tax
returns and unpaid income taxes for tax years 2009 through 2016. To that end, Fredrick James
prepared an engagement letter dated May 26, 2017, pursuant to which Edwards engaged Fredrick
James to represent him before the IRS. That engagement letter called for a retainer of $7,500.00
Page 2 of 12
and specifically informed Edwards that services rendered by Fredrick James would be charged
on an hourly basis. In a telephone conversation betweefi Joe Dolan and Defendant Edwards, Joe
11. On May 31, 2017 Edwards signed the aforementioned engagement letter, a copy of
which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A.” Thereafter, Defendant Edwards paid Fredrick James
the refiuired retainer and Fredrick James rendered services in accordance with the engagement
letter.
12. Fredrick James sent Defendant Edwards monthly invoices detailing the services
rendered on an hourly basis. Edwards did not complain about Plaintiff’s services until he was
informed in July 2017 that the retainer had been depleted and an additional amount was due.
’
13. On July 18, 2017, Defendant Edwards falsely informed Fredrick James that he was
I
told by Mr. Dolan that the $7,500.00 retainer was actually a flat fee to Cover the entire cost of the
preparation of the income tax returns for eight years prior to and including 2016 and
Communications with the IRS. In fact, Fredrick James never agreed to a flat fee as falsely
asserted by EdWards but rather, consistent with the engagement letter and its invoices, rendered
14. On July 18, 2017, Edwards demanded a return of $6,500.00 of the retainer Fredrick
James had already earned. At that time, Edwards issued an extortionate threat in a text message
to Fredrick James to the effect that if the portion of the retainer he demanded was not retufned,
he would cause damage to Fredrick James’ reputation, referring to his “team of people overseas
that write & post reviews about bfisiness online for my clients.” A copy of a printout of the
Page 3 of 12
15. Fredrick James issued its July 19, 2017 invoice to Edwards for $2,079.38 due above
16. Thereafter, in funherance of his extortionate threat, Edwards commencéd a false and
malicious campaign to damage the reputation of Fredrick James consisting of first, to Plaintiff’s
present knowledge, on or about July 21, 2017, posting a negative review on Google.cpm (a copy
of therwritten review is attached hereto as Exhibit “C”), which publication is located at the
following
'
~ URL:
httpé://www.google.com/search?q=fredrick+james&oq=fredrick+james&aqs='chrome..69iS7j012
j69i6013.4775jOj7&sourceid=chr0me&ie=UTF—8#1rd=0x8....
17. On or about July 24, 2017, Edwards posted a negative one-star review on the Fredrick
of,
James’ Facebook page in substance identical to the review he posted on Google.com, a copy
which attached hereto as Exhibit “D”), which publication is located at the following URL:
https://Www.faceb00k.com/pg/FredRick.JamesAccounting/reyiewsfi
18. Next, Edwards filed a false complaint with the Better Business Bureau on or before
July 25, 2017. A copy of that complaint is attached hereto as Exhibit “E.”
19. Edwards then posted a July 25, 2017 Video and written post containing :false,
misleading and defamatory Statements about Fredrick James on Youtube.com (a copy of the
written post is attached hereto as Exhibit “F”), which publication is located at the following
URL: http://WWW.Y0utube.com/watch?v=mXBHGDecSCo.
20.Next, Edwards posted a tweet on Twitter.com on July 25, 2017 under username
@MonéterResource calling Plaintiff a “Scam” and a “Ripoff” with. a link to the Youtube.com
Video attached hereto as Exhibit “F” (a copy of the tweet is attached hereto as Exhibit “G”),
Page 4 of 12
21. In addition, on July 27, 2017 Edwards posted a false, misleading and defamatory
Statement on a website known as “Ripoff Report,” a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit
http://www.rip0ffreport.com/feports/fredrick—james—accounting-taX—consulting/clearwater—
florida-33764/fredrick—james—‘accounting-tax—consulting—i-got¥scammed-by—fr¢drick-james—
accounting-0f-1388606.
22. On a date believed to be in or about the last week of July 2017, Defendant Edwards
consulting.pissedconsumer.c0m/i-paid—7500—for—tax—prep—all-i—got-were-invoices-t0ta11ing—9800—
201707291081067.htm1. Thereafter, Defendant Edwards and those acting in concert with him
attached hereto as Composite Exhibit “1,” which publication is located at the following URL:
https://fredrick—james—accounting—tax-and—consulting.pissedconsumer.cofn/i-paid-7500-for—tax—
23. On or about the first week of August 2017, Defendant Edwards posted another
misleading one-star review on the Fredrick James’ Facebook page claiming that it would cost
over $34,000 to get his tax returns done. A copy of which is attgched hereto as Exhibit “J,”
I
https://www.facebook.com/FredRick.JamesAccounting/reviews/.
24. Plaintiff believes that Defendant Edwards also conspired with other individuals, the
Doe Defendants, to create fictitious former clients and publish bad reviews as if they were actual
Page 5 of 12
former clients of Plaintiff The negative reviews published by Defendant Edwards and {he Doe
Defendants in July and August 2017 are the only negative at one-star reviews ever published.
25. On or about July 24, 2017, Defendant Edwards and, upon information and belief, the
Doc Defendants, continued Edwards’ false and malicious campaign to damage the reputation of
Fredrick James by posting a negative one-star review appearing to be from a person named
“Harlan Richards” on Google.com. A copy of the written review is attached hereto as Exhibit
V
https ://Www. goo gle. com/ search?q=fredrick+j ames&oq=fredrick+j ames&aqs=chr0me. .69i5 7j012
named Harlon Richards and does not have record of any customer experience consistent with the
false' Statements in the review and therefore believes that this false and negative review was
26. In August 2017, a false one—star Google review was. posted by one of the Doe
»
Defendants under the name of Juan Capasso Pinto. Plaintiff has not had’a client by that name
nor does Plaintiff have record of any customer experience consistent with the false Statements in
the review and therefore believes that this false and defamatory review was posted at the behest
of Defendant Edwards. A copy of this review is attached hereto as Exhibit “L”. The false
https://www.google.com/search?q=fredrick+james&oq=fredrick+james&aqs=chr0me..69i57j012
27. On or about August 11, 2017, a false one—star Facebook review was posted under the
name Vince Van Patton, claiming that Plaintiff charged his mother $3000 to do a year’s worth of
Page 6 of 12
accounting. Plaintiff has no record of any. customer experience consistent with the false
Statements in the review and therefore believes that this false and defamatory review was posted
at the behest of Defendant Edwards. A copy of this review is attached hereto as Exhibit"‘M”,
https://mvw.facebook.com/Qg/FredRick.JamesAccounting/reviewsfl
28. Ifi this campaign, Edwards has been falsely disparaging Plaintiff causing harm to its
reputation and, at the same time, minimizing the extent of his serious income ta); issues
regarding Which Plaintiff rendered services in acCordance with the engagement letter.
29. The publications by Defendant Edwards’ and the Doc Defendants are false, malicious
and cast Plaintiff in a false light, solely as part of Edwards’ campaign to extort a refund if the
retainer earned by Plaintiff and in an effort to avoid having to pay the balance he owes Plaintiff.
My.
(BREACH OF CONTRACT)
30. Plaintiff re-alleges the General and Factual Allegations above and incorporates them as
31. Pursuant to the contract between the parties, Defendant Edwards owes Plaintiff
32. Defendant has failed and refused to pay. the balance due, as a result of which he has
breached the contract causing Plaintiff to suffer damages as a direct result of said breach.
costs and interest in its favor and against Defendant, RONALD D. EDWARDS, for breach of
contract, as well- as for an award of attorney’s fees and costs, and any other and further relief the
Page 7 of 12
mamages for
in.
34. Defendant and those acting concert with him havé published defarhatory
statements ostenSibly regarding Defendant’s dispute with Plaintiff solely in a calculated effort to
impugn Plaintiff for its refusal to pay Defendant money to which hé is not entitled.
35. Defendant published false and defamatory statements to the effect tha‘t Plaintiff had
agreed to provide services to him for a flat fee notwithstanding the language in the written
agreement he; signegi stating that Plaintiff’s services would be charged, and were charged, on an
Plaintiff in unjustified retaliation for Plaintiff’s refusal to pay Defendant money to which he is
not entitled.
36. The Statements constitute libel per 56 as they are false, defamatory, impugn Plaintiff” s
37. Upon information and belief, Defehdants acted with malice in writing and publishing
the Statements because they knew the statements at issue and the impressions created were false
or they‘ acted With reckless disregard to their falsity. Upon information and belief, the
Statements were specifically published for the purpose of damaging Plaintiff’s reputation and
38. As a direct and proximate'result of the Statements’ publication, Plaintiff has suffered
damages, significant reputational harm, loss of capital and revenue, lost productivity, expenses
'
Page 8 of 12
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, FREDRICK JAMES, LLC, requests a judgment for damages,
costs, and prejudgment interest in its favor and against Defendant, RONALD D. EDWARDS, as
well as for any other and further relief the Court deems just and proper under the circumstances.
COUNT III
Qniunctive Relief for DEFAMATION-Libel and Libel Per Se)
39. Plaintiff re—alleges the General and Factual allegations above and incorporates them as if
40. Defendant and those acting in concert with him have publiéhed defamatory
statements ostensibly regarding Defendant’é dispute with Plaintiff solely in a calculated effort to
impugn Plaintiff for its refusal to pay Defendant money to which he is not entitled.
41. Defendant published false and defamatory statements to the effect that Plaintiff had
agreed to provide services to him for a flat fee. notwithstanding the language in the written
agreement he signed stating that Plaintiff’s services would be charged, and were charged, on an
Plaintiff in unjustified retaliation for Plaintiff’s refusal to pay Defg’ndant money to which he is
not entitled.
42. The Statements constitute libel per se as they are? false, defamatory, impugn Plaintiff s
43. Upon information and belief, Defendants acted with malice in writing and publishing
the Statements because they knew the statements at issue and the impressions created were false
or they acted with reckless disregard to their falsity. Upon information and belief, the
Statements were specifically published for the purpose of damaging Plaintiffs reputation and
Page 9 of 12
44. As a direct and proximate result of the Statements’ publication, Plaintiff has suffered
significant reputational harm, loss of capital and revenue, lost productivity, expenses and loss of
intangiblé assets.
45. Plaintiff has and will continue to suffer irreparable harfil if Defendant is not enjoined
to remdve the false publications 6n the Internet as set forth above and from continuing to engage
46. There is no adequate remedy at law because Defendant’s defamatory conduct has no
47. There is a substantial likelihood that that Plaintiff will succeed on the merits of this
services to be billed on an‘hourly basis and that Defendant has engaged in defamatory conduct.
48. Consideratién of public interest supports entry of the injunction sought herein
49. Civil Remedies under Florida Statute §812.035(1) and (1)(b) provide that the Court
may “enjoin Violations of the provisions of §812.012~812.037” Florida Statutes and even impose
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, F REDRICK JAWS, LLC. hereby respectfully requests that this
>
Honorable Court enter a judgment against Defendants, jointly and severally as follows:
a. Issuance by this Court of an Order decreeing that the Statements about Plaintiff
Page 10 of 12
products, goods, or services which defame, disparage, or contain libelous
statements about Plaintiff; and
ii. ordered to take all actions necessary to remove all of the Statements
published from the Internet, including but not limited to, requesting
removal of the Statements from the websites where they are posted on the
'
Internet;
d. For any and all other relief as this Court may deem just and proper.
COUNT IV
C ONSPIRAC
50. Plaintiff re-alleges the General and F acfual allegations set f011:h above and
51. Defendant Edwards and the Doc Defendants knowingly and willfully conspired and
agreed among themselves to unlawfully post false and defamatory reviews about Plaintiff for the
purpose of damaging Plaintiffs reputation and injuring Plaintiff in its trade, Business and
profession.
52. In furtherance of the conspiracy, the Doe Defendants published false and defamatory
negative reviews about Plaintiff under fictitious names at the behest of Defendant Edwards,
53. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ participation in, and furtherance of,
costs and interest in its favor and against Defendant, RONALD D. EDWARDS and the DOE
DEFENDANTS, for civil conspiracy, as we11_as for an award of attorney’s fees and costs, and
any other and further relief the Court deems just and proper under the circumstances.
Page 11 of12
(a.
Dated thiszfday of July, 2018.
By:
finjanfififiillard,
Amy E.
/
HILLARD CUYKENDALL & ALLRED, P.A.
Esq’uire
Cuykendall, Esquire
Alexander R. Allred, Esquire
13143 66‘“ Street N.
FL Bar No. 0764361
FL Bar No. 010347
FL Bar No. 0100892
Page 12 01°12
Filing # 75523158 E- Filed 07/25/2018 07:11:56 PM
: NQTICE! Those consumers located in the European Union eifecfive 5324;2018 due to the GDPR citizens 0! any (aux-42¢ applicable coumry or anyone sitting m or wasting from such A
acuity are prohfi'xiied from using this site Read our T? e to team mom. By usmg our site you understand and agree in mega- lama; on '£ Name us... .mame Europe; This
site uses scones to stow infomauon myour cémputerwmm may track your hmwsm behavior fit: on: sfieand pmvide you with ads or other offém that may hareievant to you Some
'
'
e essefitia! to make out site work mats hertp us Impldvé the use! expenence Read on
REGISTER LOGiN E
gmflfl Benort
Don‘t let them get awevvmh i193 Letthe truth b: mo‘m‘m I fiéfiew Lates'it Reports
V
l Advanced Search
m
I iBrflwsé Héieijbris
I Tow: Visits since 199?: 9,009,579,596 I Estimated Money Consumers Saved since 1997: $15,766,?64,293.41 I Repons fired: 2, 253 598 f: f f
ngrams&' Helga
'
Consumer
'
lnThe ‘
RigafiRepm .01 Repa‘rx’c—urRagmafian
:
Report: #1388608
‘;
"i
_~2
k
aogfintnpcof
For A25 ”‘3?” A;
,
Florida
,
.
i
{‘Dgg’tietthéngA :S—ub‘mlfiad Tau, Juiy 2;:201?
E
Ge‘é‘faywim‘fi IUpdatedzThu, My 2?, 2017
I Repcrted By: Reaakj D — ciearwater Florida USA
I Fredrick James Accounting Tax & Consulting
,_7 U 608 Bypass Dr#112
Make sure they make deanvater, Féofida
:
E
M'PWW; _
2
USA
.
’
_.
2529580
,
on
.Phone: mmmogm , verified
‘
‘ _
Ubu‘énasse‘
b rucaw ”J g mmart?
nWeb: mtgjfxwmfrednckgames.com
1 Category: income Tax Service
FAST 3051NESS
c:
FINANCING
u H m a ass-3344452
mm
uwwam
..
w-
of money Cégamlagf I;
floriSa
Purim 83v;are
LLB Scammed
3mm: x; 2561MB?
Céearwater Figs :3
CE 371-4403 for
haiai‘on-J :
,7 ,,
4.__
Jam-£5Tmnzo Amhfiad
James Tmnmi Emma} Adxafisezs 53%? has? 1215! w!
Wee work area got sfxaci :iazaam‘: 5315:1731“: aenduci
MEI
' '
~~
'
',
,.
Report! I
Consumer
;
'5
RW IBM
“ml!!! “mm
‘ 5m Tan-Jrifinnrv‘ 5!; «min»; will!” aft
***ELECTRONICALLY FILED 07/25/2018 07:11:55 PM: KEN BURKE, COURT, PINELLAS COUNTY***
I 7023} V5323 since 1997: 9,009,579,596 I Estimaied Money Consumers Saved since 3997: $15,766,764,293A1 I Repms $593: 2 253, 598 a f 1;
'
‘
Directosry Directory -
.—
Tax Ram [in 03
Repair
.
'
1? reputation the nght ma
‘ ’
“383011
fin
_ AQCDE
Consumng:
if?”
:,.,,____
PcéfisalS-Eg
EDitotial
fing‘z ‘szégf'sfii
”we“: “magma
Commeni
Tim‘b'v;
3% (
————————
é
*
’
i
Add
Got Scammed
James Accounting.
Check
tax gamma; and
Rebuttal to this Report
this Gui.
sfick taiker
w‘h‘no amp i”
11
for sure.
I
for
had
Google
them and
'
E’
IS
honm
a
File
(—
New Repon
About YOU 7
55 this
Ripoff Report
Ripoff Repbrt
A busmess
fine Of defense
'
on the lntemet.
.
_
first
Rim? Repofi
w > W A“ “7 handfe
office} Joe ioEd
my case. {who wod-(s
me that he spake
in a back
m Fred H your busmess
_ .
‘5
x
i
7
,
Sac (taunt;
and that it wouid cost me @530 t0 9%?
Wimfig to make a
event/{hing done. Joe Deian evea confirmeé
twéce to me that fihe W580 wouéd cover
commitment to
everyihing, A lot of maney‘, bat I wanted £0 customer satisfacfion
getmy pwbiem soived paid them I the
Ciick here flaw”
$7599 in advame {Big Mistake)
# _‘_Mfi didn‘t know waa beEng I biilad SEEBXhDUI 10 Eaten to his entertaining stories)
‘
Befom knew 5t, my 37580 was used up:
I while the}; wagerft even done with
BC’QUS ~Ce§eb¥§iy And never E got a completed tax reéum. l calied them for 33 update, and
Advemsememg their secmtary {Bid me {key needed anathar 545% $0 commas, and it was
;
FACE <3 3km going [0 he SASGDG more + 36k to 58k in eddéiionai fees. {fist the 3mm
CREAM Rm“?
'
mmpieie any returns: i asked for 3 refund of 1hr} $5811 They refused,
exgiainiag because {hey are pmfessfianais, they desen‘e a professional
income.
gamut; 3km swam To aéd insuktto injury‘ Fred sen? me a text saying the}; we“; done doing
"""nk'e mam “W“ busisess with me, and [would be gettizzg a final bik for «#52300 an top of my
advertisements 05 Based
and Foxeign companies $7583 and to "Have A Nice Day)" So, I got Nothing for my 57500 but an
fifiggéggsgi‘gfogg invoice! Since than I fired them and had to hire enema: firm, who iooked at
6‘de overfhe $3351 7 Years
‘—"“—‘ '
their invoiceé
They gave me
and {old me that was being taken
a set rate of $21,506 {0! everything (Net $341,066}
r advantage 0% big time.
1 {Bid my
WHAT IS YOUR Mather what they did: and she got sick is her stomach
STORY?
ARE YOU A ViCTJM?
FORMER EMPLOYEE?
WE WANT TO HEfiR m
Contact Our Team New!
cucK HERE
' '
t s
,
571:? m: 3: c9626 w:
2722de Piuuff Remns ;
- ~ , cur mama
I
'
Programsé-Q Helpfi Bummer Ven'fied Businfls: L593 Scream-355 y lnTh-E RipafiRmrt 'z—“ Rep: rYourRegu‘tabanTheR
Services FAQs .
Resources' Directory Diyectoryi Thank You
V
_
. Media Investigates 1
8 v *
'
1 l1 '
V V ,
Mififif
rt: afieéiian
Cfick Here to read other Rigofi Remarks on Fmdfitifi James
Accountinu Tax & Consulting
Respond :0 this j
Also a victim? Repair Your
report! Reputation!
Pie 3 Rebufisl
:
1
----- v—i
fireafiepon (E) :7
, ,
Baéstarted
E
3C3)
Capture timestamp (UTC): Fri 29 Jun 2018 20: 53: 49 GMT Page 3 of 6
‘
8:]
Services FAQS Resources »
‘
3*“ f F: 1
Beam: J
R B hg c
daily Rm;
Sindee Scam
-
Jed" R3: Benn-3%:
4441,
Fmgramsé‘: Helga
‘
.sz ~ '
:3
'
’,g::~j,|;;
wef-IDERF ‘EAL‘FH
FHTSTCH? Séar
lZE-nnabiam (smite
flijfifafifi‘f
3:51:2me me.
‘
gas-61f ace
In
m
The Media
Rivet? Re on
5 .
Alliance
RI $915 or!
.
MABCEn-
Smart
’
Shoggr
Rivet? Report -
Girl»: Gan?
\lefifie-j Businass
"
'
'
In The Media
fiRe ori
19051655
Rmofi Regen
anCBS 19 —
Giobal
. Markablq'
Manse
Rivet? Regan
m
on ABC 15
Smart
Rind? Regori
-
m
Gifis Gone
.
Rigafi Regan
';
on F5): 1] _
1;
Car Reogir
I
Wanna sue Rigofi Raw ]
Donate to our Efions i
BadBusinessBureau. com Q
Media Requests }
F_AQ ]
A_____bou1 Us E
Ccntacws