Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Tarik Boussetta
2014-2015 All Streams & Levels
COLLE METHODOLOGY
Foreword
The " useful expressions " suggested in this document should in no means be considered passe-partout formulas to
learn by heart. When misused, they may generate an inverse effect other than the expected one. Moreover, they do
not replace the learning of a larger bank of argumentation vocabulary terms.
Finally, the candidate should take into account the appropriateness of the language register as expected by the oral
examiner. Obviously, indulging in familiarity should be avoided.
A- THE PRESENTATION:
1- INTRODUCTION
The first sentence is meant to put the article in its context. Sometimes it has to do with:
USEFUL EXPRESSIONS
USEFUL EXPRESSIONS
The author of the text should be designated as “journalist”. Avoid the term author ( and a fortiori writer). In
general, try to make the best out of the title and the author’s status if they are specified: They necessarily reflect
the adopted point of view, the targeted readership, and sometimes the rhetoric used.
USEFUL EXPRESSIONS
- This article, taken from…, (deals with / considers / addresses) the issue of…
- This article is taken from a recent edition of…
- The article under scrutiny reports on …
- The article’s main theme is…
- The article under study provides the reader with (an analysis/ a debate over…)
- The newspaper the article is taken from is well-known for its (left-wing / right-wing /
liberal / conservative…) leaning.
- The (title / subtitle) of the article is based on a (play on words/a pun).
- The eye-catching (title / subtitle) of the article arouses the reader’s interest at once.
- The subtitle gives us a clear idea of what the article is about.
- This article was published right after …which cast new light on the issue of…
- The author is not just any journalist. He/she is (a leading figure / an expert…) in the
field of…
- As the text is written by a politician, its aim is obviously not purely informative. It is
actually meant to…
Avoid
- The article speaks / talks about…
- The article is a reflection on…
USEFUL EXPRESSIONS
It is needless to specify the format of your presentation…: First I will summarize the text and then I will
comment upon it.
2- SUMMARY
At this stage, it is about reproducing a “logical skeleton” of the text-which should not necessarily be
confused with its original linear development. Contrarily, it is preferable to showcase the journalist’s line
of reasoning; which would lead to a thorough comprehension of the content of the document by any
interlocutor who would not have access to it. The pitfall to avoid is summarizing a text in a linear and
laborious fashion- paragraph by paragraph. A candidate should not give the impression of cutting out the
text. Additionally, the journalist’s point of view had to be adopted so that the summary of the text would
look as if it is the author’s. Hence, it is recommended that you renounce the use of declarative
constructions, such as The journalist (says / points out / argues that…) in order not to vainly weigh
down the purpose.
In case it might seem necessary or pertinent to reorganize the elements of the text for a clearer summary, it
is often possible to resort to the plan: 1/ Facts, 2/ Causes, 3/ Consequences. (2 and 3 may be reversed)
As for examples, their dubious use in a summary (For example / For instance) merits careful thought.
The objective of the task (summary) is to sort out the essential from the accessory. Keeping some of them
depends on whether an element is too abstract to decipher.
Do not forget that a summary is a reformulation task. The latter necessitates your effortful use of a rich
vocabulary bank to be able to express, in your own words, ideas that are already in the text. The use of
paraphrasing techniques is a must to avoid the pitfall of plagiarism.
A judicious use of linking words / transitions makes it easy to present elements in a structured manner;
thus, avoiding a line-to-line reformulation and an overall thematic overview. Your summary has to restore
It is not necessary to announce your summary plan in detail. Make it short and simple by mentioning the
number of the steps you would have identified in your reasoning.
USEFUL EXPRESSIONS
Avoid
- The text can be (split up / divided) into…
- The journalist says that…and then the journalist says that…
-
3- THE TRANSITION SUMMARY / COMMENTARY
Transitions, after a very short pause, should be brief and concise so that you can smoothly move on to the
commentary stage (purely reflective and personal).
USEFUL EXPRESSIONS
4- THE COMMENTARY
The (probably two or three) points to approach / touch upon would be the starting point of your commentary.
USEFUL EXPRESSIONS
It is the commentary stage that adds value to your potential and where your knowledge, value system,
critical thinking, and opinion come into play. The best way to work on it is by focusing on the very themes
a given text evokes other than broadly making use of your prior knowledge of its general theme.
As your commentary proceeds from the text, any analysis of the tone, implicit opinion, and the ideological
bias that motivates the journalist’s standing point are always welcome. Thus, it may sometimes be useful to
dedicate a first part of your commentary to a detailed analysis of the tone / register / implicit point of view
of the author on one condition:
This analysis should always relate to a, more or less, obvious intention of the author.
Do it only if there is something particularly significant about the subject. For instance, it is feasible
in case you feel the author resorts to a humoristic tone that is marked by some detachment vis-à-vis
the subject under study.
You may advance / state an idea that is directly linked to the subject, develop an argument that is
skimmed over by the author, or even contradict him / her. Nevertheless, do not criticize for the sake of
criticizing.
Some texts could legitimately be qualified as being biased (subjective / partial), but this partiality
should not be considered as cunning or malignant throughout the whole text. It is quite common
that a journalist expresses his / her own political / ideological…opinions.
The journalist should not be systematically accused of ignoring some aspect or another on the
pretext that you wish to add it. However, it may be interesting to revise the presuppositions, to add
touches to them.
Express yourself by using the subject pronoun I, and avoid, at all costs, the royal We (We can see / say…).
Starting by a commentary closer to the text would be the right thing to do. Over a second phase, you can
expand the debate, but in reasonable proportions.
If you are having a difficult time building your commentary (preparation phase), ask yourselves questions
that would nourish your reflection:
Can the example(s) given in the text be generalized?
Can the situation be compared with that of another country?
Is the theme developed convincingly illustrated?
Are there conflicting views over the issue at stake? Why is it so (contentious / controversial /
polemical)?
Is there one striking sentence or phrase that could be worth commenting on?
Can a (political / moral / ethical / sociological…) standpoint be read between the lines?
- The journalist forcefully showed that…. But I wish to qualify one of the assertions he
/ she makes.
- I have a few reservations about the journalist’s approach.
- To my mind, the problem needs to be seen through a different (angle / lens / prism)
- The journalist has every right to think that…but I am afraid I cannot be as positive.
- The article seems to me too harsh a criticism of…
- The criticism the journalist levels at…seems to me slightly overblown.
- I must say I am somewhat surprised by this argument.
- Although there can be no doubt that…, I think it would be going too far to say that…
- The argument sounds rather convincing at first sight, but on further examination…
- The (alleged / so-called) progress the journalist refers to seems to me…
- Such argument(s) should not be taken (for granted / at face value)
- Isn’t it rather paradoxical to maintain that…?
- I see what the journalist is driving at but I think one should remain wary of hasty
generalizations.
- Let’s not jump to conclusions.
- This is true only (up to a certain point / to a certain extent).
- Can these two elements really (be put on an equal footing / be equated)?
5- THE CONCLUSION
It should be open to further debate and not a mere recapitulation of what has been developed in your
commentary. Relate its content to a personal experience that has to do with the theme of the text, or
qualify the latter by mentioning an event that came after the publication of the article.
Thank your oral examiner / the jury for their attention; it is the best way to conclude!
USEFUL EXPRESSIONS
- In conclusion
- To conclude
- I would like to conclude this presentation (with one observation / by saying that…).
Avoid
*Translated and abridged by Mr. Tarik Boussetta- EFL Teacher at CPGE Taza
*Edited by Mr. Saad Mounaim- EFL Teacher at CPGE Taza
GRENECHE, F. (2010) L’anglais aux concours commerciaux. Editions Ellipses Optimum. (pp. 161-173)