Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Individual/Group Individual
Weighting 20%
Context:
We live in a dynamic world, which consists of various complex adaptive systems and
requires today’s managers to take a holistic view of the business. In order to gain a holistic
understanding, managers need to understand all the key stakeholders and the intended and
unintended consequences of their decisions. To achieve this objective, managers need to
learn and apply systems thinking tools and techniques. One such tool is “Rich Picture”. Rich
picture helps us express our own understanding of the world, the stakeholders to be
considered and the impact that they may have our actions. Tools such as Rich picture,
CATWOE and Root Definition reports helps us to understand others’ perspectives without
getting involved in conflicting arguments of convincing one another about their own
worldview.
Instructions:
This assessment is to be completed individually and is linked to Assessment 1.
To successfully complete Assessment two (2) students will write a comprehensive report
that helps resolve the problem they introduced in Assessment 1. Using the resulting
discussion as a platform students are required to analyse and synthesise consequences on
For further assistance please refer to the below links for examples of Rich Pictures and
CATWOE analysis.
• https://elabor8.com.au/rich-pictures-and-catwoe-simple-yet-powerful-scope-
modelling-techniques/
• https://www.sswm.info/planning-and-programming/exploring-tools/preliminary-
assessment-current-status/rich-pictures
Submission Instructions:
The Rich Picture and Root Definition Report using CATWOE needs to be produced according
to academic writing guidelines and must be submitted in compliance with the following;
Students should use the brief to guide what to include in the assessment and the following
rubric to inform the standard required.
Difficult to understand Information, arguments Information, arguments Information, arguments Expertly presented; the
for audience, no and evidence are and evidence are well and evidence are very presentation is logical,
Effective logical/clear structure, presented in a way that presented, mostly clear well presented; the persuasive, and well
Communication poor flow of ideas, is not always clear and flow of ideas and presentation is logical, supported by evidence,
argument lacks logical. arguments. clear and well supported demonstrating a clear
supporting evidence. by evidence. flow of ideas and
Percentage for this Line of reasoning is often Line of reasoning is easy to arguments.
criterion difficult to follow. follow.
Correct citation of Demonstrates Demonstrates use of Demonstrates use of high Demonstrates use of Demonstrates use of
key resources and inconsistent use of credible and relevant quality, credible and good quality, credible high-quality, credible
evidence good quality, credible resources to support and relevant resources to and relevant resources to and relevant resources
and relevant resources develop ideas, but these support and develop ideas. support and develop to support and develop
to support and develop are not always explicit or arguments and arguments and position
ideas. well developed. statements. Shows statements. Shows
evidence of wide scope evidence of wide scope
Percentage for this within the organisation within and without the
criterion for sourcing evidence organisation for sourcing
evidence
10%