Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
GROUP: ………..
......................... ......................... .........................
CLASS: .................
......................... ......................... .........................
Session …11+12 Date: ……..
......................... ......................... .........................
Strengths Weaknesses
These reach the targeted intention to help the - Lacking null hypothesis
readers get fundamental ideas about this study. - Including irrelevant research questions to
the purposes.
2. Logic of arguments for the use of conceptual framework/ theoretical background of the project
Strengths Weaknesses
Supplying the readers with basic theories and key - Lacking definition of narrative story telling.
terms. - Lacking balance between headings (just 2
headings) and definition as well as
conclusion.
- To be clearer, the definitions of storytelling
is too specific, detailed, but the definition of
speaking is fairly simple and broad.
3. Logic and appropriateness of the research methods and research tools employed in the study
Strengths Weaknesses
- The time and number of students in the pilot
Cover letter is well – prepared test will be conducted on
- Irrelevant standard of the scale
Strengths Weaknesses
- Ensure the validity and reliability by using No specific time for data collection
tests (Cronbach’s alpha, even anticipate
what test to use if the data is parametric or
nonparametric;
- Data collection procedure is clear
5. Questions/Other comments & suggestions for improvement
a) Is the questionnaire created only by the researchers or is it a duplicate with adjustment from other
studies?
b) How can you ensure that 100 % of your participants are pre – intermediate?