Case Title: Republic v.

CA Two collective bargaining agreements were entered into between NPDC and NPDCEA
GR Number and Date: 87676 | December 20, 1989 (TUPAS local Chapter No. 967) and NPDC and NPDCSA (TUPAS Chapter No. 1206), for a
Author: TJ Paula T. Jornacion period of 2 years.

Ponente: Grino-Aquino, J.
Doctrine:
1. Since National Parks Development Committee (NPDC) is a government
agency, its employees are covered by civil service rules and regulations (Sec. 2,
Art. IX, 1987 Consitution). Its employees are civil service employees (Sec. 14,
Exec. Order No. 180).
2. Union membership in government; While the Committee’s employees are
allowed under the 1987 Constitution to organize and join unions of their choice,
there is as yet no law permitting them to strike.
3. In case of a labor dispute between the employees and the government, Sec.
15 of EO No. 180 provides that the Public Sector Labor-Management Council,
not the Department of Labor and Employment, shall hear the dispute.
These union staged a strike at Rizal Park, Fort Santiago, Paco Park, and Pook ni Mariang
Makiling at Los Banos, Laguna, alleging unfair labor practices by NPDC.
Type of Case Filed:
Ruling of Lower Courts: Denied/Granted - brief basis
Issue 1:
Whether NPDC is a government agency or a private corporation.
Ruling 1:
YES, NPDC is a government agency.

Name of the parties: (and their respective role in the case): Ratio 1:
Since 1977 to 1981, the annual appropriations decrees listed NPDC as a regular
Petitioner: government agency under the Office of the President ad allotments for its maintenance
Respondent: and operating expenses were issued direct to NPDC.
Third person (Mortgagor, Assignor): if available
Issue 2:
Applicable Articles: Whether NPDC’s employees have the right to strike.

Facts: (Instead of using respondent and petitioner use the name please :)) Ruling 2:
Although NPDC was originally created in 1963 under EO No. 30, as the Executive No, NPDC’s employees do not have the right to strike.
Committee for the development of the Quezon Memorial, Luneta and other national
parks, and later renamed as the National Parks Development Committee under EO No. Ratio 2:
68 in 1967, it was registered in the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as a non- Apply Doctrine 1.
stock and non-profit corporation, known as “The National Parks Development
Committee, Inc.” Apply Doctrine 2.

In 1987, the Civil Service Commission notified NPDC that pursuant to EO No. 120, all Issue 3:
appointments and other personnel actions shall be submitted through the Commission. Whether the Public Sector Labor-Management Council shall hear the dispute.
Meanwhile, the Rizal Park Supervisory Employees Association, consisting of employees
holding supervisory positions in the different areas of the parks, was organized and it Ruling 3:
affiliated with the Trade Union of the Philippines and Allied Services (TUPAS). YES.

Ratio 3:
Apply Doctrine 3.