Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht (GmbH & Co. KG) is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Historische Sprachforschung / Historical Linguistics.
http://www.jstor.org
γέρωνδ' ίθύςκίενοίκον
rfjρ ΆχιλεύςϊζεσκεΔιίφίλος,εν δέ μιναυτόν
εύρε
Here the tmeticεν ... εύρε is unique, and a compound ένενρίσκω
hardlyexistsin AncientGreek (unlikee.g. εγκρίνωbesides 1:309 εν <5'
έρέταςεκρινεν,or έμβαίνωbesides 1:311 εν δ* άρχοςεβη). Tmesis'
beingbut a misnomerforthe non-contiguity of preverband verb,one
mightalternatively argue that εν need not even be a preverb;it could
be a free-floating adverb,thus within he found him',as in 9:359-361
ό'ψεαι. . . νήαςεμάς,εν δ*άνδραςέρεσσέμεναι μεμαώταςyou will see
my ships, and withinmen eager to row'. The lattercan perhaps be
explained as "tmetic"for δ'
άνδρας έρεσσέμεναι έμμεμαώτας, even as
Od. 13:244-245 έν μεν γάροι σίτοςάθέσφατος,έν δέ τε οίνοςγίγνεται
has a double "tmesis" for έγγίγνομαι. But otherwisethere clearly
Hist. Sprachforsch.106, 36-38, ISSN 0935-3518
© Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht1993