Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
373
Andrjesdóttir et al. / Detection of Fouling in a Heat Exchanger …
www.heatexchanger-fouling.com 374
Heat Exchanger Fouling and Cleaning – 2011
Another important parameter is the heat capacity rate specific heat of oil, c h , is available. Furthermore, knowing
ratio:
the specific heat of water it is possible to compute the
hch , c product UA . It is then possible to compute the Number of
m m
Rh Rc c c . Transfer Units for oil as well as the effectiveness for oil,
ccc
m hch
m
and to compare the result with the actual value obtained
from experiments. The process is repeated until
From these definitions and from the energy balance in
convergence is obtained for the specific heat c h .
the heat exchanger it is possible to write: E c E h R h ,
Subsequently it is checked that the value obtained can be
showing that it is possible to determine one of the considered valid for other temperature levels.
effectiveness values when the other one is known. Every The thickness of the channels in the test rig heat
type of heat exchanger is represented by an equation linking exchanger is small so that the flow regime is turbulent.
the effectiveness to the Number of Transfer Units. For a Hence it is assumed that the convection heat transfer
counter flow heat exchanger, this equation is: coefficient varies with the power 0.8 of the Reynolds
number (which is directly proportional to the mass flow
1 Eh rate). Since one flow rate is kept constant, it is possible to
ln
1 Eh R h
NTU h if R 1 and NTU E h if write the overall heat transfer as:
h
Rh 1 1 Eh
h
1
R h 1. U 0.8
1 m c,ref 1
The thermo-physical characteristics of water are well h c,ref m c hh
known. On the contrary, those of oil must be determined
for the temperature range encountered during the Through a number of measurements it is possible to
experiment. Experiments on the test rig showed that if the determine the convection heat transfer coefficient for oil
mass flow rate on the hot side is kept constant while the (the hot side) and the reference convection heat transfer
mass flow rate on the cold side is varied, the steady state coefficient for water (the cold fluid). Note that the actual
temperatures can be assumed to be constant. By knowing convection surface area is determined by the geometry of
the temperatures in a steady state, the effectiveness for the the heat exchanger and the number of plates between the
cold fluid can be calculated. From the equations introduced fluids. Also it is important here to note that the values
above the Number of Transfer Units for the cold side can obtained by this procedure are well within the usual range
then be calculated, assuming that a first guess value of the for the fluids considered.
www.heatexchanger-fouling.com 375
Andrjesdóttir et al. / Detection of Fouling in a Heat Exchanger …
The last values to be determined are the thicknesses of The whole process is described in full detail in (Lalot et
the channels and the thickness of the separating wall in the al, 2011b).
numerical model, considering that the real width is fixed by
the number of plates in the heat exchanger. These values It can also be noted that the measurement noise is about
were determined during transient state. A set of five 0.1°C for both the cold side and the hot side and that the
experiments with varying mass flow rate of the cold fluid amplitude of the oscillations is much higher on the water
were carried out on the test rig and simulated in the side than on the oil side. The latter point is due to the fact
numerical model. The thickness values for the channels are that the water flow rate is varying and that the plates are
determined in a way that the correlation used in the program similar to a thermal filter.
leads to the correct convection coefficient. The value of the
wall thickness is then adjusted by trial and error method, so 43.5
VALIDATION
In order to validate the dynamic behavior of the
numerical model number of experiments were performed.
The application of the lock-in technique requires the flow
42.5
rate of the cold fluid to oscillate around a mean value. So, a 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000
final validation was carried out. The outlet temperature of
the cold fluid and of the hot fluid were recorded and Sample #
simulated. This is used here as an example to validate the Fig. 5 Comparison of recorded values and simulated values
accuracy of the model and how well it represents a real heat for an oscillating water flow rate (oil side)
exchanger. Figure 4 shows the outlet temperature of water
for such an experiment. It can be seen that the simulated It must also be noted that the outlet temperatures
values are very close to the experimental values. should be relatively stable to ensure that they do not
influence the process. So, it is important to know if the
41 technique is efficient even for low values of the oscillations.
Outlet temperature of water (°C)
Simulation Experiment Hence, from the experiments, the modulus of the complex
40.5 number was computed, as explained before, for various
amplitudes. Taking the reference values when the amplitude
40 of the outlet temperature of water is about 2°C, as seen in
Figure 4, the modulus ratios are plotted in Figure 6.
39.5
1
Module ratio
39
0.9
38.5
0.8 Experiments
38
Simulator
1.15 1.2 1.25 0.7
4
x 10
Sample # 0.6
Fig. 4 Comparison of recorded values and simulated values
0.5
for an oscillating water flow rate (water side)
0.4
Figure 5 shows the outlet temperature of oil for the
same experiment. It can be seen that the simulated values 0.3
are also very close to the experimental values and based on
these two figures it can be concluded that the numerical 0.2
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
model is reliable. Amplitude ratio
For all experiments the sampling period was 2 seconds. Fig. 6 Comparison of the modulus ratio computed using
So, it can be seen in Figure 4, that even after more than 6 recorded values and simulated values for an oscillating
and 1/2 hour (11 700 samples), the simulated values are still water flow rate
very close to experimental values.
www.heatexchanger-fouling.com 376
Heat Exchanger Fouling and Cleaning – 2011
This again shows that the simulations are reliable and experiment. The apparent decrease of the effectiveness is
that very small oscillations (close to 0.2°C) are sufficient to analyzed using the Cusum test, as it is known to be one of
detect a variation of the modulus of the complex number. the most sensitive tests for drift detection (NIST website,
Provided that the length of the sliding observation window 2011). Figure 7 shows that the detection time corresponds
is large enough, the results are independent of the to a decrease of about 6.3% of the overall heat transfer
measurement noise (close here to 0.1°C); which is the most coefficient and of the convection coefficient for the oil side.
important characteristic of the method. As previously mentioned fouling effects can be
included in the numerical model in a controlled manner.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The numerical model was thus used to simulate fouling to
In order to assess the efficiency of the new technique, it test the applicability of the lock-in technique to detect drifts.
has been decided to compare the results obtained by this The method can in principle be applied to both sides, i.e.
technique to the results obtained by a very standard method: the hot side or to the cold side. The results for the
the analysis of the evolution of the effectiveness. As application of the method to the cold side will be shown
mentioned, it is not possible to control the fouling rate in here. The mass flow rate on the cold side was excited by a
the test rig. On the other hand, it is easy to get an evolution sinusoidal wave while the flow rate of the oil was kept
of the effectiveness which is comparable to what would be constant. The outlet temperatures for a clean heat exchanger
obtained when fouling occurs by varying one flow rate. To and a progressively fouled heat exchanger were then
enable a comparison with another method, the choice here computed for various amplitudes of the sinusoidal function.
has been to vary the oil flow rate. It is important to note that The noise level added to the outlet temperatures to account
in this case, the effectiveness of the water side is much for uncertainty in real systems was set to 0.1°C, according
more sensitive to the flow rate variation than the to what has been previously measured. The length of the
effectiveness on the oil side. sliding observation window was set to 30 exciting periods.
During the first half part of the experiment, the oil flow The evolution of the differential of the module, for a clean
rate is stable and then it is progressively decreased. The and fouled heat exchanger, was then computed for the
water flow rate is kept constant during the whole different amplitude levels.
www.heatexchanger-fouling.com 377
Andrjesdóttir et al. / Detection of Fouling in a Heat Exchanger …
Figures 8 and 9 show such an evolution for two different From the figures it is observed that a drift can easily be
amplitudes. detected by a comparison to a threshold as low as 0.002 in
both cases. Drift is detected sooner for higher amplitude
Differential of the module of the complex number
0.035
levels but the response is still quite quick for the more
Amplitude = 0.98055
40
0.025 modulus differential as if the heat exchanger was kept
clean. Note that if the amplitude is decreased to 0.2°C
39.5
0.02 (not shown in the figures), fouling is detected when the
39
overall heat transfer coefficient has decreased by 5.7%,
0.015 0 20 40 60 80
Sample #
which is still lower than what is obtained by the
effectiveness analysis.
0.01
To summarize, it can be seen that fouling is detected
when the overall heat transfer coefficient has decreased by
0.005
Threshold = 0.002
about 4.3% as Figure 9 shows confirming that the present
technique is more sensitive than the effectiveness analysis.
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 It can be noted that this level is similar to what is obtained
Sliding window # (4.4%) when studying the difference between actual values
Fig. 8 Detection of fouling for a 1°C amplitude of the and values estimated by a neural network model of the heat
oscillations of the outlet water temperature exchanger (Gudmundsson and Lalot, 2011).
Differential of the module of the complex number
0.03
network models are able to discriminate the effect of
Ratio of the overall coefficient = 0.957
40
fouling from the effect of the variation of the viscosity of
Outlet water temperature
0.025
the fluid. So, it is important to check that the lock-in
Amplitude = 0.4973
39.8
technique is also able to discriminate two effects. To do so,
0.02 39.6
the effect of the decrease of the flow rate has been studied
39.4
and compared to the effect of fouling.
0.015 39.2
Figure 10 shows the results for both sides (water side
39
0 20 40 60 80 and oil side). It can be seen that it is necessary to plot the
0.01
Sample # current state point in the complex plane to be able to clearly
0.005
discriminate the two effects, although this has been done in
Threshold = 0.002 transient state (the water flow rate is oscillating). This is
0
equivalent to what has been found when studying an
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
electrical heater by the lock-in technique (Lalot et al.,
Sliding window #
2011a).
Fig. 9 Detection of fouling for a 0.5°C amplitude of the
oscillations of the outlet water temperature
De
220 Water 10 Oil
Y (x1000)
Y (x1000)
flo cr e
w a
ra sing
te 9
flow rate
Decreasing
215 8
ng
uli
g fo
7
asin
210 6
ncre
I
205 4
ling
ou
gf
3
sin
rea
200 2
I nc
195 0
53 54 55 56 57 58 145 150 155 160
X (x1000) X (x1000)
Fig. 10 Comparison of the effect of fouling and the effect of a flow rate decrease
www.heatexchanger-fouling.com 378
Heat Exchanger Fouling and Cleaning – 2011
www.heatexchanger-fouling.com 379