Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
6657)
Beneficiaries of CARP
As stated in DAR AO 09 (series of 2011), the basic qualifications of farmers/tillers in order to
be qualified are as follows:
(1) landless as defined by RA 6657;
(2) Filipino citizen;
(3) permanent resident of the barangay and/or municipality where the landholding;
(4) at least fifteen (15) years of age at the time of identification, screening and selection;
and
(5) willing, able, and equipped with the aptitude to cultivate and make the land
productive.
RA 6657 lists down qualified CARP beneficiaries in order of priority:
(1) agricultural lessees and share tenants;
(2) regular farmworkers;
(3) seasonal farmworkers;
(4) other farmworkers;
(5) actual tillers/occupants of public lands;
(6) collectives/cooperatives of the above beneficiaries; and
(7) others directly working on the land. RA 6657 also provides that the BARC11 and the
DAR should assist the potential CARP beneficiaries in listing or registration as potential
beneficiaries.
Exemption: Excluded under the coverage of CARP are military reservations, penal colonies,
educational and research fields, “timberlands”, undeveloped hills with 18 degrees slope and
church areas. Permanent exclusions have been granted on private farms directly, permanently and
exclusively used for prawn farming or fishponds and for commercial livestock and poultry
raising.10
Retention limit: CARL further lowered the ceiling on land ownership of agriculture lands to 5
hectares and allowed additional 3 hectares for each heir (of at least age 15 and actually tilling the
land or directly managing it).
Land valuation and owner compensation: CARL required just compensation on land, which
based land valuation on the following: (1) capitalized net income; (2) comparable sales; and (3)
market or zonal value. Land valuation is primarily the responsibility of the Land Bank which
appraises the property based on the land valuation formula provided by the Department of
Agrarian Reform. Landowners may appeal valuation to the special agrarian court or in the
judiciary court, which is the final arbiter in the determination of just compensation.
Beneficiary repayments and subsidy: Lands that have been paid by government through Land
Bank (i.e., compensable lands) are amortized by beneficiaries over 30 years with 6% annual
interest. Public A&D lands are non-compensable based on the Public Lands Act. Also, non-public
lands except those foreclosed properties of GFIs and the land estates.
Non-land transfers: These are land transfers that do not involve actual transfer of land
ownership but changes or improvement of property rights over land assets. The mechanisms
include: (1) Leasehold Operation (LHO), which is a lease agreement between landowner and
tenant applied to agriculture lands not covered by CARP (e.g. below 5 hectares or on retained
agriculture lands)
Modes to Acquisition of Private Lands: CARL provides for various acquisition modes that
includes:
(1) operation land transfer (OLT), used for rice and corn lands under PD 27;
(2) compulsory acquisition, where government expropriate private lands whether or not
landowner cooperates;
(3) voluntary offer to sell (VOS), providing incentive for the landowners to voluntarily offer their
land for coverage by raising the cash portion of landowners’ compensation by five percent and
corresponding 5% decrease in the bonds portion; and
(4) voluntary land transfer (VLT), allows landowners to directly transfer their lands to tenants
and workers under mutually agreed terms between peasants and landowners on land value and
payment terms.
It is not super successful only understated. The DAR and DENR claim that the past 25 years of
CARP has led to the distribution of 8.25 million hectares, just a shade below 90 percent of its
actual target of 9.21 million. These lands were parceled out to 5.43 million beneficiaries.
However, these accomplishments are highly contested. If we were to compare these figures
with the original scope at the beginning of the program, DAR would have accomplished 80
percent of its target, with a balance of at least 2 million hectares.
Beneficiaries of CARPER
Land Farmers
Agricultural Lessees
Tenants
Regular, seasonal and other farmworkers
Qualifications:
Must be at least 15 years old
A resident of the barangay where the land holding is located
Own no more than 3 hectares of agricultural land.
SIGNIFICANT PROVISIONS
Section 21 – Budget
Budget – Section 21 amending Section 63 for CARL states that the budget allocated for
the 5-year extension is 150 Billion pesos which will be sourced from three funds: Agrarian Reform
Fund, General Appropriations Acts (GAA) and other sources of funding like privatization of
government asset, foreign donors, etc. This budget is the largest per year in the history of CARP.
The Official Gazette released an update on the accomplishments in the field of agrarian
reform as of June 30, 2014.
As of December 31, 2013, the government has acquired and distributed 6.9 million hectares of
land, equivalent to 88% of the total land subject to CARP." Of this area, the Aquino
administration has distributed a total of 751,514 hectares, or 45% of the total landholdings to be
distributed to the farmer beneficiaries left under this administration. From this, DAR has
distributed 412,782 hectares and DENR has already distributed 338,732 hectares.
Rejected amendments. progressive party-list bloc in Congress proposed amendments to the bill
during the second reading but the sponsors and the majority flatly rejected their proposals.
CARP gives an option to landowners to choose “all other arrangements alternative to the physical
distribution of lands, such as production or profit-sharing, labor administration, and distribution
of shares of stocks which will allow beneficiaries to receive a just share of the fruits of the lands
they work.”
The KMP asserts that this provision undermines the intent of any agrarian-reform program.
The failures of CARPER
Class Struggle. For as long as landlords and big businessmen hold the political and economic
power, the just struggle of Filipino farmers for land will continue. By not implementing a genuine
agrarian-reform program that will pave the way for social justice, the Arroyo regime has, in effect,
validated the need for the agrarian revolution that is already raging in the countryside.
GEED 10033
Readings in Philippine History
Narrative Report
Submitted by:
Camara, Lawrence
Canlas, Cyryll
Castañeda, Ashley
Castillo, Stephen Joy
Centeno, Mark Daniel
Cuenco, Jean Lucille
De Jesus, Daniela
De Len, Sofia Bien
Dela Cruz, Camille
De Vera, Scandynevia
Dumpang, Daisy
Furton, Jimmuel
BSBA FM 1-1