Under the facts stated in the decision of the majority, I come to the conclusion that interest at the

rate of 12 per cent per annum should be paid up to the date of payment of the whole indebtedness is
made. Payment of such interest is expressly stipulated. True, it is stated in the mortgage contract
that interest was to be paid up to March 31, 1934, but this date was inserted merely because it was
the date of maturity. The extension note is silent as regards interest, but its payment is clearly
implied from the nature of the transaction which is only a renewal of the obligation. In my opinion, the
ruling of the majority is anomalous and at war with common practice and everyday business usage.

Under the facts stated in the decision of the majority, I come to the conclusion that interest at the
rate of 12 per cent per annum should be paid up to the date of payment of the whole indebtedness is
made. Payment of such interest is expressly stipulated. True, it is stated in the mortgage contract
that interest was to be paid up to March 31, 1934, but this date was inserted merely because it was
the date of maturity. The extension note is silent as regards interest, but its payment is clearly
implied from the nature of the transaction which is only a renewal of the obligation. In my opinion, the
ruling of the majority is anomalous and at war with common practice and everyday business usage.

Under the facts stated in the decision of the majority, I come to the conclusion that interest at the
rate of 12 per cent per annum should be paid up to the date of payment of the whole indebtedness is
made. Payment of such interest is expressly stipulated. True, it is stated in the mortgage contract
that interest was to be paid up to March 31, 1934, but this date was inserted merely because it was
the date of maturity. The extension note is silent as regards interest, but its payment is clearly
implied from the nature of the transaction which is only a renewal of the obligation. In my opinion, the
ruling of the majority is anomalous and at war with common practice and everyday business usage.

Under the facts stated in the decision of the majority, I come to the conclusion that interest at the
rate of 12 per cent per annum should be paid up to the date of payment of the whole indebtedness is
made. Payment of such interest is expressly stipulated. True, it is stated in the mortgage contract
that interest was to be paid up to March 31, 1934, but this date was inserted merely because it was
the date of maturity. The extension note is silent as regards interest, but its payment is clearly
implied from the nature of the transaction which is only a renewal of the obligation. In my opinion, the
ruling of the majority is anomalous and at war with common practice and everyday business usage.

Under the facts stated in the decision of the majority, I come to the conclusion that interest at the
rate of 12 per cent per annum should be paid up to the date of payment of the whole indebtedness is
made. Payment of such interest is expressly stipulated. True, it is stated in the mortgage contract
that interest was to be paid up to March 31, 1934, but this date was inserted merely because it was
the date of maturity. The extension note is silent as regards interest, but its payment is clearly
implied from the nature of the transaction which is only a renewal of the obligation. In my opinion, the
ruling of the majority is anomalous and at war with common practice and everyday business usage.
vvvvvvvv Under the facts stated in the decision of the majority, I come to the conclusion that interest
at the rate of 12 per cent per annum should be paid up to the date of payment of the whole
indebtedness is made. Payment of such interest is expressly stipulated. True, it is stated in the
mortgage contract that interest was to be paid up to March 31, 1934, but this date was inserted
merely because it was the date of maturity. The extension note is silent as regards interest, but its
payment is clearly implied from the nature of the transaction which is only a renewal of the
obligation. In my opinion, the ruling of the majority is anomalous and at war with common practice
and everyday business usage.

Under the facts stated in the decision of the majority, I come to the conclusion that interest at the
rate of 12 per cent per annum should be paid up to the date of payment of the whole indebtedness is
made. Payment of such interest is expressly stipulated. True, it is stated in the mortgage contract
that interest was to be paid up to March 31, 1934, but this date was inserted merely because it was
the date of maturity. The extension note is silent as regards interest, but its payment is clearly
implied from the nature of the transaction which is only a renewal of the obligation. In my opinion, the
ruling of the majority is anomalous and at war with common practice and everyday business usage.