Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Region VIII
DIVISION OF SAMAR
MARABUT - District

MARABUT NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

303611
BRGY. AMANTILLO MARABUT, SAMAR

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR TEACHERS

JUNE 2018 - APRIL 2019
Name of Employee: HILDAS.LAVADO Name of Rater: LUZ O. MATEO
Position: MASTER TEACHER I Position: School Head
School: MARABUT NHS Date of Review: April 12, 2019

TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING TOB FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

KEY
ACTUAL
MAJOR FINAL RESULT WEIGHT
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RESULTS RATING SCORE
OUTPUTS AREAS PER KRA
(KRAs) Q E T
5 150 or more updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
Prepare lesson plans and daily lesson 4 130 - 149 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
logs of activities including appropriate, JUNE 2016 -
20% 3 100 - 1299 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way 5 5 5 5.00 1.00
adequate and updated instructional APRIL 2017
materials 2 50 - 99 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
1 1-49 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
10 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate
5
and updated
8 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate
4
Facilitate learning through the use of and updated
written/computerized lesson plans, 6 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate
JUNE 2016 - 3
modules, teaching guides, and other 10% and updated 5 5 5 5.00 0.50
APRIL 2017
learning resources with the adequate
and updated instructional materials
 Facilitate learning through the use of
written/computerized lesson plans,
JUNE 2016 -
modules, teaching guides, and other 10% 5 5 5 5.00 0.50
APRIL 2017
learning resources with the adequate 4 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate
2
and updated instructional materials and updated
2 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate
1
and updated
Teaching (Supported with write-up and documentation)
Learning 5 100% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
Process
(50%) 4 85%-99% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
Initiate discipline of students including
JUNE 2016 - 3 70%-84% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
classroom rules, guidelines and 10% 5 5 5 5.00 0.50
APRIL 2017
individual and group task
2 55%-69% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed

54% and below of the indicators in classroom walk-through are

1
observed
100% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and
5
submitted every last day of the month
Monitor attendance, diversity 85%-99% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and
4
appreciation, safe, positive and submitted every last day of the month
motivating environment, over-all physical JUNE 2016 - 70%-84% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and
10% 3 5 5 5 5.00 0.50
atmosphere, cleanliness, and orderliness APRIL 2017 submitted every last day of the month
of classrooms including proper waste 55%-69% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and
disposal. 2
submitted every last day of the month
54% and below of the pupils monthly attendance and are
1
monitored and submitted every last day of the month
Indicators:
Monitor, evaluate and maintain 1. Test Questions with TOS
pupil’s/student’s progress through 2. Class Record (with dates of quizzes, assignments,
projects, portfolio, etc.)
*Assessment for Learning 3. Rating sheets
4. List of pupil’s/student’s output like projects, activities
(Formative)
done/performed, etc.
JUNE 2016 - All indicators were prepared and submitted two weeks before the
*Assessment as Learning 5% 5 5 5 5 5.00 0.25
APRIL 2017 scheduled due time
3 indicators were prepared and submitted one week before the
(Reflective) 4
scheduled time
*Assessment of Learning 3 2 indicators were prepared and submitted on the scheduled date

(Summative) 2 1 indicator was prepared and submitted on the scheduled date

 *Periodic Test 1 no indicator was prepared and submitted on the scheduled date.

100% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment

5
successfully
85%-99% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment
4
successfully
Conduct remediation/enrichment
JUNE 2016 - 70%-84% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment
programs to improve performance 4% 3 4 5 4 4.33 0.17
APRIL 2017 successfully
indicators
55%-69% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment
2
successfully
Students' 554% and below pupils/students were given
Learning 1
remediation/enrichment successfully
Outcomes
(20%) 100% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted
5
before the scheduled time without error
85%-99% of the pupils/students records were prepared and
4
submitted on or before the scheduled time without error
JUNE 2016 - 70%-84% of the pupils/students records were prepared and
Maintain pupil’s/students school records 4% 3 5 5 5 5.00 0.20
APRIL 2017 submitted on or before the scheduled time with minimal error
55%-69% of the pupils/students records were prepared and
2
submitted one week after the due time
54% and below of the pupils/students records were prepared and
1
submitted two weeks before the due time
85% and above of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the
5
required learning competency.
82-84% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required
4
learning competency
Attain the required GSA for Grade level JUNE 2016 - 79%-81% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required
4% 3 4 4 4 4.00 0.16
and learning areas APRIL 2017 learning competency
Provision of Quality 76%-78% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required
2
Basic Education learning competency
75% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required
1
learning competency
5 Attained 3% and above increased MPS per subject area
4 Attained 1% and above increased MPS per subject area
Attain 3% increased in MPS per subject JUNE 2016 -
3% 3 Attained 0% and above increased MPS per subject area 5 5 5 5.00 0.15
in every grading period APRIL 2017
2 Attained 1% decreased MPS per subject area
1 Attained 2% and below decreased MPS per subject area
 100% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with
5
set agreements were fully documented.
84%-99% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment
4
with set agreements were fully documented.
Conduct regular/periodic PTA JUNE 2016 - 68%-83% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplished with
5% 3 4 4 4 4.00 0.20
meetings/conferences APRIL 2017 set agrrements were fuly documented.
52%-67% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment
2
with set agreements were fully documented.
51%-below of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment
1
with set agreements were fully documented.
100% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring
5
was followed up supported with documents.
84%-99% of the parents of the students needing academic
4
monitoring was followed up supported with documents.
Community
Visit parents of pupils/students needing JUNE 2016 - 68%-83% of the parents of the students needing academic
Involveme 5% 3 4 4 4 4.00 0.20
academic monitoring/follow up APRIL 2017 monitoring was followed up supported with documents.
nt 15%
52%-67 of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring
2
was followed up supported with documents.
51%-below of the parents of the students needing academic
1
monitoring was followed up supported with documents.
100% of project accomplishment completed were achieved with
5
documentation.
84%-99% of project accomplishment partially achieved with
4
documentation.
Undertake/initiate
JUNE 2016 - 68%-83% of project accomplishment partially achieved with
projects/events/activities with external 5% 3 3 3 3 3.00 0.15
APRIL 2017 documentation.
funding/sponsorship
52%-67 of project accomplishment partially achieved with
2
documentation.
51%-below of project accomplishment partially achieved with
1
documentation.
Conducted a completed action research and have presented in at
5
least in the Division Level Research Conference/Summit
Conducted a completed action research and have presented in at
4
JUNE 2016 - least in the District Level Research Conference/Summit
Conducted action research 5% Conducted a completed action research but have not presented the 2 2 2 2.00 0.10
APRIL 2017 3
result in any level of research conference/summit
2 Conceptualize an action research
1 Never conducted any action research

Profession
al Growth
 Attended an aggregate of 48 hours of relevant trainings at least in
5
the Division level and earned 9 units in graduate studies
Attended an aggregate of 48 hours of relevant trainings at least in
4
Profession the Division level.
al Growth Attend relevant Attended an aggregate of 24 hours of relevant trainings at least in
and trainings/workshops/conferences or JUNE 2016 - 3
5% the District level 4 4 4 4.00 0.20
Developm seminars or earn 9 units of post graduate APRIL 2017 Attended an aggregate of 24 hours of relevant trainings at least in
ent 15% education 2
the District level.
Attended at aggregate of 24 hours training at least in the School
1
level
(Attached certificate of participation and Grades)

5 Received at least 1 certificate of recognition in the Division level.

Received special 4 Received at least 1 certificate of recognition in the District level

JUNE 2016 -
awards/citation/recognition for exemplary 5% 2 2 2 2.00 0.10
APRIL 2017 3 Received at least 2 certificate of recognition in the School level
performance
2 Received at least 1 certificate of recognition in the School level
1 Didn't received any certificate in any level
Attain five of the following: 5 Attained 5 indicators with documents
4 Attained 4 indicators with documents
1. Serve as coordinator in any working
3 Attained 3 indicators with documents
committee in the school
2. Publish an article in national
2 Attained 2 indicators with documents
circulation
Plus 3. Serve as demonstration JUNE 2016 - 5% 4 4 4 4.00 0.20
Factor 5% teacher/resource speaker/cooperating APRIL 2017 1 Attained 1 indicator with documents
teacher
4. Received an outstanding employee
award at least in the District level
5. Conducted an innovation
6. Participated in any activities as
teachers’ association
TOTAL (Excluding Plus Factor) 100% OVER - ALL RATING OF ASSESSMENT 4.58
Plus Factor 5% ADJECTIVAL RATING Outstanding
Adjectival Rating Scale
Outstanding 4.500 5.000 Ratee: Rater:
Very Satisfactory 3.500 4.499
 Satisfactory 2.500 3.499 HILDA S.LAVADO LUZ O. MATEO
Unsatisfactory 1.500 2.499 Master Teacher I School Head
Poor 1.000 1.499