any or all

supposed
transcripts
meeting minutes

me and person that named me as the named person in reference

me and supervisor of person that named me as the named person in reference
me and the organization legal counsel of person that named me as the named person
in reference

person that named me as the named person with supervisor

person that named me as the named person and organization's legal counsel
person that named me as the named person and organization's person
responsible for the organization's record keeping system

supervisor of the person that named me as named person and organization's legal
counsel
supervisor of the person that named me as named person and organization's person
responsible for the organization's record keeping system

[US v. Childs, 5 F. 3d 1328 - Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit 1993]

---------

me and the person that named me as person

my driver's license
my birth certificate
my passport
my cac card
us government identification
st mary's county library card
st mary's county jury duty roster
commercial readiness state driver's license
maryland driver's license

author of concern and me

author of concern and supervisor
organization's legal counsel
ncis authorized rep and me
nics authorized rep and supervisor
ncis authorized rep oath to support constituion

ncis investigator
reference filed into mepc
document filed into mepc

https://www.dol.gov/general/dol-agencies

https://www.osha.gov/

Contact the office nearest you.

Maryland State Plan Office

The Maryland State Plan has jurisdiction over all public and private sector
workplaces in the state with the exception of federal employees; the United States
Postal Service; private sector maritime activities (shipyard employment, marine
terminals, and longshoring); and military bases which are covered under OSHA
jurisdiction.

Maryland State Plan Office

10946 Golden West Drive, Suite 160
Hunt Valley, MD 21031
Business Hours: 8:00am - 4:30pm ET
Phone: (410) 527-4447
Fax: (410) 527-4481

OSHA Area Office

https://www.dol.gov/sol/

subject matter jurisdiction

venue

The federal OSHA office covers only federal agencies; the United States Postal
Service; private sector maritime activities (shipyard employment, marine terminals,
and longshoring); and military bases.

Baltimore/Washington DC Area Office

U.S. Department of Labor-OSHA
1099 Winterson Road, Suite 140
Linthicum, Maryland 21090
Phone: (410) 865-2055/2056
(410) 865-2068 FAX

On-Site Consultation Program

Maryland On-site Consultation Program

The head of the agency directs the person responible for both the fairness of due
process search for the transcript to file into and on the official record

or else the head of the agency creates either a written form of expression
publically explaining that an absence of duty to care about fairness of due process
exists at such and such time, date and place.

or absence of ethical duty to care about creating the appearance of discriminating

against me because of nationality which supposedly give me the priviledge
protection against slavery [].

I think at near this time date and place the official transcript exists of the
hearing completed by the head of the agency with me for my priviledge of treating
fair [paguidance] in due process [see 5500] where the head of the agency proved
beyond a reasonable doubt that the person named in XXXX is me .

the agency proved dhe is the person named in the statute.

----------------
dispute

I am currently absent the observation [note 1] that the head of the agency named me
as the person in any or all suitability factor complaint

I AM ABSENT THE THOUGHT THAT HEAD OF AGENCY NAMED ME AS THE PERSON IN

fix
I think due process is fair when the head of the agency meets with me
and creates a publically available written form of expression explaining that the
person named in xxxx is me.

-----------------
I AM ABSENT THE THOUGHT THAT HEAD OF AGENCY NAMED ME AS THE PERSON IN

observation and interpretation

support

At this particular time, date, and place, I am absent the thought that I am the
author of
http://sportsjamm.com/18-year-old-girl-is-dropping-jaws-in-the-football-world/

bing commander security director

I think the adjuducation records that I requested are absent meeting minutes
between me and Chief detailing that Chief and I checked out
each others identity with either any
United States identification document

birth certificate

commercially ready driver's license

state goverment personal identification card

local government card

I am absent the thought that
objectives to work as a team
to both inspect and check to
agency and I will both swear
applies to me.
my supervisor gave me a work task with resources and
with the head of the agency
some identification standard that the head of the
in an open court under oath or affirmation that xxxx

I am absent the thought the person responsible for hr gave me opm position
description with knowledge skills and abbilities for me to both interpret and self
apply xxx to myself 24/7 for me to serve as a security guard for classified
information.

I am absent the thought the person responsible for writing the job application that
I successfully applied for highlighted that I would be
required to both interpret and self apply xxxx to myself for me to serve as a
security guard for classified information.

I think it is a good idea that

------------
https://www.justice.gov/jmd/do-it-right
(14) Employees shall endeavor to avoid any actions creating the appearance that
they are violating the law or the ethical standards set forth in the Standards of
Ethical Conduct. Whether particular circumstances create an appearance that the law
or these standards have been violated shall be determined from the perspective of a
reasonable person with knowledge of the relevant facts.

-------------
Search Results
Not all Federal agencies use ALJs to adjudicate disputes before the agency. There
are several other kinds of hearing officers who conduct administrative proceedings
throughout the Federal government.May 12, 2016
Examining Due Process in Administrative Hearings - OPM
https://www.opm.gov/news/.../examining-due-process-in-administrative-hearings.pdf
Feedback
About this result
[PDF]Examining Due Process in Administrative Hearings - OPM
https://www.opm.gov/news/.../examining-due-process-in-administrative-hearings.pdf
May 12, 2016 - Not all Federal agencies use ALJs to adjudicate disputes before the
agency. There are several other kinds of hearing officers who conduct
administrative proceedings throughout the Federal government.

https://www.opm.gov/news/testimony/114th-congress/examining-due-process-in-
administrative-hearings.pdf

preliminary fact of fairness

conclusions of finding of fact and law

intitial determination of preliminary finding of fact and fairness

The ALJ position was created by the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) to ensure
fairness in administrative proceedings before Federal government agencies.

ALJs have two primary duties which are

1) presiding over agency hearings, taking evidence,

and acting as a preliminary fact finder in proceedings, and

2) making an initial determination about the resolution of a dispute.

-------------

Re: [RedemptionByMethod] Administrative Agencies � The Fourth Branch of Government

Thursday, July 28, 2016 3:12 AM Mark as Unread

From:
"Eileen _ essentialer@hotmail.com [RedemptionByMethod]"
<RedemptionByMethod@yahoogroups.com>
To:
"RedemptionByMethod@yahoogroups.com" <RedemptionByMethod@yahoogroups.com>
Raw Message Printable View
Troy's comments below indicate he does not know what he is supposed to demand when
requesting an administrative hearing. I guess he thinks one just goes in there and
let's them decide one's outcome without demanding that they prove he is the person
named in the statute. He thinks if one receives a benefit, one can be made subject
to the code.

What, exactly, is a benefit? If one is deceived into applying for a SSN, and is
not given full disclosure as to what rights one is waiving, and, in fact, is told
it is mandatory so that the voluntary nature of it is hidden from the applicant,
and then as a result one is required to pay another government tax for the rest of
his working life, is that really a benefit? I think not.

I cannot think of one thing that government "gives us" that has not been paid for
by our own blood, sweat and tears. Can you? (I'm not talking to perpetual welfare
recipients.)

But he is right that status matters. If you allow the government to see you as a
U.S. citizen, then they do what they want to do. A U.S. citizen is an enemy of the
state, and a member of their corporation. So you don't want to go into an IRS
administrative hearing and blindly allow them to make a decision. You want to make
some demands which they must prove, and to do that you probably don't want to
accept the type of hearing they offer.

Eric Williams says, make them prove they have political jurisdiction over you
without violating the 13th amendment against involuntary servitude. Make them
prove they had it before they brought the charges.

Whenever the government is offering you an administrative hearing, you want to be

careful. The IRS offers a few different types of hearings to challenge their
decisions, but that's not what you want. All they are offering you is the
opportunity to challenge the amount of tax, but you want to challenge the idea that
you are subject to the tax at all. You want to demand an adjudicative hearing and
a declaratory order that they prove you are the person named in the code. It
doesn't matter whether you have a SSN or a driver license or are receiving social
security, if you are not the person named, the code has no application to you. It
is unconstitutional as applied to you. (Remember that phrase "as applied to me.")
You also want to challenge the definition of "income." If you do not have
corporation profits, you do not have income. Actually, it is the corporation that
pays the income tax, not individuals. If you have a corporation that earns income,
the corporation pays the tax. You do not pay a tax on the payments you receive
from the corporation.

When you demand the administrative hearing under your terms, they will deny you the
hearing, and at that point they have denied you due process and it is game over.

On 7/27/2016 2:10 PM, J Mark j_mark.bettis@yahoo.com [RedemptionByMethod] wrote:

Administrative Agencies � The Fourth Branch of Government

thelastbastille.wordpress.com/2014/04/26/administrative-agencies-the-fourth-branch-
of-government/

The Doctrine of Constitutional Avoidance: A Legal Overview

digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc462944/

RELATION-BACK DOCTRINE CONDEMNS ADMINISTRATIVE TAX LIEN AND LEVY

famguardian.org/PublishedAuthors/Indiv/MeadorDan/Articles/RelationBackDoctrine-
020701.htm

PHANTOMLAW

Re: [t_a_t] defy citation with administrative procedures act April 10, 2013
From: "Troy Duwayne, Barclay" <barkyort@

Hi FF, I say: I am not trying to find fault, just attempting to give a little
support. I am speaking from my past experiences chasing the phantom called
�administrative law.� And, for sure, I for one do not have all the answers.

You said: �I always heard and believed (due to the results) that one starts with an
administrative hearing because of the need to exhaust administrative remedies and
because that is when and how you prove you are a natural man and not a corporation.
I had also heard that when one goes into court as defendant, it is assumed that one
lost at the administrative level and is appealing that decision.�

I say: If I had followed administrative law rules of court, I would have been
jailed for longer than 20 days. If you have any ties to their system, like
Ashwander Doctrine rules # 6 your status defeats you in any court setting. For 20
days in Dec. 1991, the IRS tried their best to get me back in their system with
offers and tricks to take the SSN back. When they determined that I was not going
�to come around� they kicked me out of jail and after that one more try to serve
papers on me. I have not heard a word from them since February 1992. Not even a
postcard. Status matters and if one has any kind of attachment to the phantom law
rules system, he has voluntarily forfeited all rights, constitutional or common law
there are. In my opinion you will never reach an Article III court, ever, via
appeals, writ of errors or any pleading of that ilk. Because, and I witnessed this
first hand in a willful failure to file case where it was brought out that he was
receiving some small benefits from the VA, therefore he was considered a hypocrite
in the eyes of �the law� and they found him guilty and gave him 5 years. That was
in 1982. The very first day, just after the trial started, his lawyer for his
defense was questioning an IRS agent on the stand, asking him questions about the
constitution and him knowing it, and the judge slammed his notebook down on the
podium, and leaned over and pointed his finger at the lawyer and said, �Counselor,
I have you know that everybody studies the constitution in the 5th grade on the 4th
day, and we are not going to talk about the constitution anymore in my court room.�
The next day the judge corrected the record by saying that he did not know for sure
the constitution was studied on the 4th day or not but it was studied in the 5th
grade. If one�s status is correct, and kept correct, then he is �in law� at common
law and phantom law rules cannot attach any of the Aswander rules to him/her.

You said: �I had heard from Walt Mann III that in order to strike terror in one's
adversaries, one should always make a demand for "a formal docketed administrative
hearing on the record". When I tried that, they decided to forget the whole problem
at hand and see things my way.�

I say: I have never heard of Walt Mann III that I remember and I am nearly 70 years
young. You may strike terror in a few sometimes but they can change the rules and
direction in the middle of the stream. In administrative situations they win in the
long run, because they know what attachment(s) one has to their phantom law system,
and if need be, it is their �ace in the hole� and they will use it. We have been
duped, deceived and tricked since the so-called civil war amendments and this so-
called administrative law. They, the powers that be, know that probably 95% of the
current population have such attachment(s) of some kind or form as they pass out
SSN at birth now. Administrative law is fairly new invention for a tyrannical kind
of so-called law that is really and truly a true phantom. On page 7 of Phantom Law
Rules it states: �There is civil law, common law, criminal law, natural law, the
law of nations, public law, private law, canon law, martial law, municipal law,
foreign law, positive law, statute law, written law, unwritten law, international
law, merchant law, and maritime law. But no where, no where, does this prominent
1859 (Bouvier�s) law dictionary mention anything, whatsoever, about administrative
law.�
For Freedom and Liberty ,
Troy

From: frogfrmr@ To: t_a_t @yahoogroups.com April 10, 2013 1:41 AM

Subject: Re: defy citation with administrative procedures act

> It appears you do not want to address the WHY you are where you are, in
> that phantom law system, but you want "the administrative law" to play
> fair and on your terms, but, the fact is it does NOT and will NOT do that.
> You apparently have something like an SSN that attaches you to their
> jurisdiction. In the eyes of the law the term is hypocrite when one wants
> it both ways. One wants the benefit without paying the cost.

I always heard and believed (due to the results) that one starts with an
administrative hearing because of the need to exhaust administrative remedies and
because that is when and how you prove you are a natural man and not a corporation.
I had also heard that when one goes into court as defendant, it is assumed that one
lost at the administrative level and is appealing that decision.

I had heard from Walt Mann III that in order to strike terror in one's adversaries,
one should always make a demand for "a formal docketed administrative hearing on
the record". When I tried that, they decided to forget the whole problem at hand
and see things my way.

Regards,

FF