Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
- The law is concerned only with the obedience to its mandate and not with the circumstances Non-chartered GOCC – organized through the Corporation Code.
or excuses of the violator.
- Administration may also clarify certain ambiguous provisions in statutes through the issuance Economic Viability Test – to determine GOCCs, as they compete in the PH Market.
of INTERPRETATIVE REGULATIONS meant to make it easier for the people to understand
and so obey the law. Administrative Bodies – quasi-legislative and quasi-judicial but they pertain to executive department.
CTA is a special court dedicated exclusively to the study and consideration of tax problems. 2. Swearing in of witnesses
3. Interrogation of witnesses
Administrative Body may be created by the CONSTITUTION or STATUTE. 4. Calling for production of books, papers and records
5. Requiring that books, papers and records be made available for inspection
Doctrine of Qualified Political Agency – the power of the President to reorganize the National 6. Inspection of premises
Government may validly be delegated to his cabinet members exercising control over a particular 7. Requiring written answers to questionnaires
executive department. 8. Requiring periodic or special reports
9. Requiring the filing of statements
The courts of justice cannot be deprived of their inherent power to decide all questions of law,
particularly if they have been initially resolved by administrative bodies only. Quasi-judicial CHAPTER 4 – THE QUASI-LEGISLATIVE POWER
power/function is subjected to judicial review, or even reverse.
Legislative Rule – in the matter of subordinate legislation, designed to implement a primary legislation by
CHAPTER 3 – POWERS OF ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES providing the details thereof.
1. Quasi-Legislative – power of subordinate legislation and permits the body to promulgate rules Interpretative Rule – designed to provide guidelines to the law which the administrative agency is in
intended to carry out the provisions of particular laws. charge of enforcing.
2. Quasi-Judicial – power of adjudication – enables the administrative body to resolve, in a
manner essentially judicial, factual and sometimes even legal questions incidental to its Legislative Regulation Classification:
primary power of enforcement of the law. 1. Supplementary – intended to fill in the details of the law and “to make explicit what is only
general”. Its purpose is to enlarge upon a statute, subject only to the standards fixed therein,
Regulation must be germane to the objects and purposes of the law, and be not in contradiction to, but in to ensure its effective enforcement in accordance with the legislative will.
conformity with, the standards prescribed by law. 2. Contingent – Issued upon the happening of a certain contingency which the administrative
body is given the discretion to determine or “to ascertain, under and pursuant to the law, by
Administrative agencies have the powers and functions which may be administrative, investigatory, its own terms, makes its own action depend, or to find the facts or conditions properly
regulatory, quasi-legislative, quasi-judicial or a mix of five. prescribed under a law as passed will or will not operate, that is, for putting in effect, applying
or suspending a law.
Administrative rule – any agency statement of general applicability that implements or interprets a law, Requisites for a valid administrative regulation:
fixes and describes the procedures in, or practice requirements of, an agency, including its regulations. 1. Promulgation must be authorized by the legislature.
2. Must be within the scope of the authority given by the legislature.
Legislative Franchise vs Administrative Franchise – delegation, cannot go beyond authorized. 3. Promulgated in accordance with the prescribed procedure. EO 200, Tanada vs Tuvera. XPN:
internal in nature, interpretative regulation, regulate only personnel of the administrative
Valid Delegation – source of the power to promulgate administrative regulation. agency and not the public, LOI.
- Circumscribed by legislative restrictions. 4. Must be reasonable.
Test of Delegation:
1. Completeness Test – complete, the executive just need to enforce it. In case of conflict, the law shall prevail over the Rules.
2. Sufficient Standard Test – sufficient standard to specify the limits of the delegate’s authority,
announce the legislative policy, and specify the conditions under which it is to be 1. Executive Orders – acts of the President providing for rules of a general or permanent
implemented, i.e. “public interest”, “simplicity, economy and efficiency”, and “public welfare”. character in implementation or execution of constitutional or statutory powers.
2. Administrative Orders – acts of the President which relates to particular aspects of
Enabling Powers – those that permit the doing of an act which the law undertakes to regulate and which governmental operations in pursuance of his duties as administrative head.
would be unlawful without government approval, i.e. issuance of licenses, approval of articles of 3. Proclamations – acts of the President fixing a date or declaring a status or condition of public
incorporation. moment or interest, upon the existence of which the operation of a specific law or regulation
Directing Powers – doing or performance of particular acts to ensure compliance with the law and are is made to depend, and which shall have the force of an executive order.
often exercised for corrective purposes, i.e. use certain chemicals to protect the environment, install 4. Memorandum Orders – acts of the President on the matters of administrative detail or of
specific safety devices. subordinate or temporary interest which only concern a particular officer or office of the
Dispensing Powers – allows the administrative officer to relax the general operation of a law or exempt Government.
from the performance of a general duty. 5. Memorandum Circulars – acts of the President on matters relating to internal administration,
Summary Powers – those involving the use by administrative authorities of force upon persons or things which the President desires to bring to the attention of all or some of the departments,
without the necessity of previous judicial warrant, i.e. padlocking of establishments, shooting down mad agencies, bureaus or offices of the Government, for information or compliance.
dog, takeover of BSP of mismanaged banks. 6. General or Special Orders – acts and commands of the President in his capacity as
Examining Power – inspect the records and premises, and investigate the activities, of persons or Commander-in-Chief of the AFP.
entities coming under its jurisdiction. Includes:
1. Issuance of subpoenas
The power to define and punish crime is exclusively legislative and may not be delegated to the 6. Act on its own independent consideration of the law and facts of the controversy, and not
administrative authorities. simply accept the views of a subordinate in arriving at a decision.
7. Render decisions in such a manner that the parties to the proceeding can know the various
Interpretation: issues involved, and the reasons for the decisions rendered.
1. Whether the delegation of power was valid.
2. Whether the regulation was within the delegation. “impartial tribunal”
3. Whether it was a reasonable regulation under a due process test.
Procedural Rights in Administrative Proceedings include:
CHAPTER 5 – THE QUASI-JUDICIAL POWER 1. The right to actual or constructive notice of institution of proceedings which may affect a
-power of the administrative agency to determine questions of fact to which the legislative policy is to respondent’s legal right.
apply, in accordance with the standards laid down by the law itself. 2. A real opportunity to be heard personally or with the assistance of a counsel, to present
witnesses and evidence in one’s favor, and to defend one’s right.
The action of an administrative agency in granting or denying or in suspending or revoking a license, 3. A tribunal vested with competent jurisdiction and so constituted as to afford a person charged
permit, franchise or certificate of public convenience and necessity is administrative or quasi-judicial. administratively a reasonable guarantee of honesty as well as impartiality.
4. A finding by said tribunal which is supported by substantial evidence submitted for
Conditions for proper exercise of the Quasi-judicial power: consideration during the hearing or contained in the records or made known to the parties
1 Jurisdiction must be properly acquired by the administrative body. affected.
2 Due process must be observed in the conduct of the proceedings.
The assistance of a counsel in an administrative proceeding is not indispensable.
Jurisdiction – competence of an office or body to act on a given matter or decide a certain question. The right to due process do not necessarily include the right to cross-examine.
Some administrative agencies may be allowed to award damages and some do not have the power - Does not require trial type proceeding.
granted. - The requirement on how decisions of court (Art 8 sec 14), does not apply to administrative
Doctrine of Implication decisions.
Shall not diminish, increase, or modify substantive rights.
Effective unless disapproved by the Supreme Court. Substantial Evidence – relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a
The provisions of the Rules of Court may be applied suppletorily to the rules of procedure of conclusion.
administrative bodies exercising quasi-judicial powers, unless otherwise provided by law or the rules of
procedure of the administrative agency concerned. Review: SC – 30 Days from receipt through certiorari – ConCom decisions.
The power to impose sanctions depend on the law which vested the same authority to hear the case.
The administrative bodies may summon witnesses and require the production of evidence when duly Enforce decision with court assistance, i.e. writ of execution or writ of mandamus.
allowed by law, and always only in connection with the matter they are authorized to investigate.
Investigate vs Adjudicate – examine vs decide. GR: res judicata do not apply to administrative decisions.
XPN: the decision was affirmed by the court.
The contempt power must be expressly conferred upon the body and, additionally, must be used only in
connection with its quasi-judicial as distinguished from its purely administrative or routinary functions. The principle of res judicata applies only to the exercise by administrative agencies of their quasi-judicial
- Indirect contempt – can only do so by initiating them in the proper RTC, it is not within their power and may not be invoked in connection with their exercise of purely administrative functions.
jurisdiction and competence to decide the indirect contempt cases.
CHAPTER 6 – JUDICIAL REVIEW
Due process – notice and hearing. The administrative proceeding shall be null and void if the right to decisions may be appealed to the courts of justice only if the constitution or the law permits it or if the
notice and hearing was denied. The right, however is not absolute, i.e. summary abatement of a issues to be reviewed involved questions of law.
nuisance per se.
Technical rules of procedure and evidence do not apply to proceedings by administrative agencies, there Only final orders, rulings and decisions of the ConCom rendered in the exercise of their adjudicatory or
are cardinal rules which must be observed by the hearing officers in order to comply with the due quasi-judicial powers may be subject to appeals. NOTE: Divisions then MR to en banc.
process requirements of the Constitution.
Questions of law vs questions of fact.
Cardinal Rights of Principles in administrative proceedings: (Ang Tibay vs CIR) Questions of Law are appealable to the courts.
1. Right to a hearing.
2. Opportunity to present his case; the tribunal must consider the evidence presented. Methods of Review: Specific or General; prescribed by Constitution, statutes, or the Rules of Court
3. Decision is supported by evidence. 15 days from receipt of decision – NOTICE OF APPEAL – original court
4. The evidence must be substantial. - PETITION FOR REVIEW – appellate court
5. The decision must be rendered on the evidence presented at the hearing, or at least - Note: MR is required prior to appeal.
contained in the record and disclosed to the parties affected. - The decision or award of the voluntary arbitrator
10. When the findings of fact are premised on the supposed absence of evidence and
Doctrines for Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions: contradicted by the evidence on record.
1. Doctrine of Primary Jurisdiction or Prior Resort – primary jurisdiction of administrative 11. When the CA manifestly overlooked certain relevant facts not disputed by the parties,
remedy; calls for the determination of administrative questions, which are ordinarily questions which, if properly considered, would justify a different conclusion.
of fact, by administrative agencies rather than the courts of justice.
2. Doctrine of Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies – calls for resort first to the appropriate QUESTIONS OF LAW:
administrative authorities in the resolution of a controversy falling under their jurisdiction They can determine questions of law but may be reviewed and reversed by the courts in proper cases.
before the same may be elevated to the courts of justice for review. FAILURE = lack of cause The interpretation of an agency of its own rules should be given more weight than the interpretation by
of action; ground for dismissal of the complaint. the agency of the law it is merely tasked to administer.
When two administrative agencies have concurrent jurisdiction, the first to acquire jurisdiction shall
exercise jurisdiction to the exclusion of the others.
Doctrine of Qualified Political Agency – Cabinet Members acting for and in behalf of the President. Alter
ego doctrine. No need of appealing the decision of the cabinet members to the President.
The Executive Control is absolute within the executive structure but subject to judicial review.
Noncompliance of exhaustion of Administrative Remedies results to lack of cause of action which may
be invoked in a motion to dismiss.
- Must be raised at the earliest possible time.
- Failure to observe the doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies does not affect the
jurisdiction of the court.
QUESTIONS of FACT:
In reviewing administrative decisions of the executive branch of the government, the findings of facts
made therein are supported by substantial evidence
- XPN:
1. When the findings are grounded entirely on speculation, surmises, or conjectures.
2. When the inference made is manifestly mistaken, absurd or impossible.
3. When there is grave abuse of discretion.
4. When the judgment is based on misapprehension of facts.
5. When the findings of fact are conflicting.
6. When in making its findings, the CA went beyond the issues of the case, or its findings
are contrary to the admissions of both the appellant and the appellee.
7. When the findings are contrary to the trial court.
8. When the findings are conclusions without citation of specific evidence on which they
are based.
9. When the facts set forth in the petition as well as in the petitioner’s main and reply briefs
are not disputed by the respondent.