Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

Letters to the Editor / Journal of Hepatology 49 (2008) 288–294 293

cooperate openly and fully in the evaluation of any


Louis Ignarro  
adverse event potentially associated with a Herbalife
David Heber à
product, we believe that objective review of these
David Geffen School of Medicine,
cases does not support a cause and effect relationship
UCLA, 900 Veteran Avenue,
between any specific Herbalife product or ingredient
Room 12217-Warren Hall,
and liver injury.
Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA

Y. Steven Henig
References
Ezra Bejar
[1] Elinav E, Pinsker G, Safadi R, Pappo O, Bromberg M, Anis E,
Herbalife International,
et al. Association between consumption of Herbalife nutritional 990 West 190th St. Torrance,
supplements and acute hepatotoxicity. J Hepatol CA 90502, USA
2007;47:514–520. Tel.: +1 310 410 9600; fax: +1 310 767 3314 (E. Bejar)
[2] Schoepfer AM, Engel A, Fattinger K, Marbet UA, Criblez D, E-mail address: ezrab@herbalife.com (E. Bejar)
Reichen J, et al. Herbal does not mean innocuous: 10 cases of
severe hepatotoxicity associated with dietary supplements from
Herbalife products. J Hepatol 2007;47:521–526.
 
[3] Stickel F. Slimming at all costs: Herbalife-induced liver injury. J Dr. Ignarro is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of Herbalife
Hepatol 2007;47:444–446. International. Dr. Ignarro’s title is for identification purposes only. The
[4] Gunawan B, Kaplowitz N. Clinical perspectives on xenobiotic- University of California does not endorse specific products or services as
induced hepatotoxicity. Drug Metab Rev 2004;36:301–312. a matter of policy.
à
[5] Bower WA, Johns M, Margolis HS, Williams IT, Bell BP. Dr. Heber is Chairman of the Nutritional and Scientific Advisory
Population-based surveillance for acute liver failure. Am J Boards of Herbalife International. Dr. Heber’s title is for identification
Gastroenterol 2007;102:2459–2463. purposes only. The University of California does not endorse specific
[6] Walker AM, Cavanaugh RJ. The occurrence of new hepatic products or services as a matter of policy.
disorders in a defined population. Post Marketing Surveillance
1992;6:107–117. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2008.05.005

Herbalife revisited: Reply

To the Editor: HerbalifeTM associated hepatotoxicity could recently be


We read with interest the HerbalifeTM response by Dr. made, following information requested from Herbalife
Ignarro and co-authors to the two reports and Editorial by the Israeli ministry of health and received in 2007.
printed in the Journal on association of HerbalifeTM with An estimated incidence of 25–30 cases per 100,000 con-
hepatotoxicity. We wish to address a number of state- sumers was made. This figure is only an approximation,
ments in their letter: since demographic data on the population of consumers
was unavailable at time of analysis. We also disagree with
1. Incidence the authors of the letter that the so called ‘‘low level of risk
of liver disease is indistinguishable from the background
We agree with the authors that the incidence of Herba- incidence of idiopathic liver disease”. In our survey in
lifeTM-associated hepatotoxicity is probably low, but not all Israeli hospitals, we identified initially 12/33 hospital-
as low as they suggest. We disagree with their comment ized patients with liver injury of so called undetermined
that 22 cases among 5.5 million consumers world-wide etiology who reported intake of HerbalifeTM products.
can be used as proof for a low incidence of the com- This still leaves 21/33 patients with so called idiopathic li-
pound(s) associated hepatotoxicity. The cases reported ver disease reflecting an incidence of <6 cases/million of
by us, were identified through an ICD-9 search in all Israe- undetermined etiology of the liver injury (after exclusion
li hospitals during a two year period, starting in 2004. This of HerbalifeTM consumers). Finally it is common knowl-
survey identified 12 cases which reported intake of Herba- edge among hepatologists that sub-clinical, asymptom-
lifeTM products among 33 patients diagnosed with crypto- atic ALT elevation may occur in patients with occult
genic liver dysfunction. The association between intake of liver disease. Our survey included only hospitalized pa-
HerbalifeTM products and hepatic injury was classified as tients, identified retrospectively through hospital records.
certain in 3, probable in 6 and possible in 3 patients using Therefore, the number of patients who may have devel-
WHO criteria. A rough calculation of the incidence of oped occult hepatotoxicity in association with HerbalifeTM
294 Letters to the Editor / Journal of Hepatology 49 (2008) 288–294

products intake may be even higher than the estimated ent to link the observed cases of liver injury to specific
incidence figure described above. batches or ingredients in HerbalifeTM products.

2. Causality 3. Additional comments

Both the Israeli and the Swiss groups used cited, We also wish to draw the readers’ attention to a mis-
internationally-accepted criteria for determining causal- quotation in the discussed letter. In our original report,
ity. The fact that we were unable to identify yet a single we did not state that the severe liver injury in the
agent as a potential hepatotoxic agent does not exclude HBsAg positive patient was the ‘‘sole” result of Herba-
causality between ingestion of the product(s) and the lifeTM hepatotoxicity. This patient developed massive
described liver injury. Moreover, among three Israeli pa- hepatocellular necrosis with liver failure which required
tients, the cause and effect was clearly established in con- liver transplantation. Immuno-histochemical tests of the
sumers who developed hepatic injury who discontinued liver explant were negative for HBsAg and HBcAg in
treatment followed by normalization of liver function this patient, who consumed excessive amounts of Her-
tests and then, by their own initiative restarted intake balifeTM products. This observation suggests, in our
of HerbalifeTM product(s) after initial resolution of the opinion, possible superimposed injury in an HBV pa-
disease, resulting in a second bout of liver injury. Thus, tient. Similarly, the patient with primary biliary cirrho-
these cases were classified as ‘‘certain.” While the de- sis (PBC) also developed an exacerbation of her liver
scribed hepatotoxicity may have been the result of an dysfunction in association with intake of HerbalifeTM
idiosyncratic reaction, there are other potential explana- products which was mainly hepatocellular, not typical
tions for the described phenomenon. These include for PBC.
among others, direct hepatotoxicity, immune-mediated In conclusion, we support the statement in the Edi-
hepatotoxicity (some patients were ANA+), interaction torial accompanying these two papers from Israel and
between several HerbalifeTM ingredients, a pharmacoge- Switzerland that there is little doubt that one (or
netic susceptibility to one of more HerbalifeTM products more) HerbalifeTM products was involved directly or
or contamination of one or more HerbalifeTM batches indirectly in the described hepatotoxicity. Although
by an unidentified etiologic agent or toxin. We also dis- the mechanism of the presumed HerbalifeTM associated
agree with the statement that liver injury occurs with hepatotoxicity has not been established yet, we have
substantial and predictable frequency and severity in a recommended and still recommend an increased
dose-dependant fashion in such patients with suspected awareness by the medical community and the public
acute hepatotoxicity. The fact that the mechanism of regarding this association until further information is
HerbalifeTM-associated hepatotoxicity is not understood available.
at present, does not exclude causality as often observed
in DILI. Daniel Shouval
Indeed, HerbalifeTM submitted to the Israeli MOH a Eran Elinav
large binder with information on extensive quality control Liver Unit, Hadassah-Hebrew University Hospital,
tests performed by the company and a designated lab Ein-Kerem, P.O. Box 12000, Jerusalem 91120, Israel
regarding some toxic ingredients and heavy metals. How- Tel.: +972 2 6777 337; fax: +972 2 6420 338
ever, information on specific batch numbers and analysis E-mail address: shouval@cc.huji.ac.il
of products used by the patients in Israel in 2004 has not
been provided so far. Therefore, it is not possible at pres- doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2008.05.010

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen