Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
these products find diverse applications [1]. trimetaphosphate and epichlorohydrin (EPI). Cross-linking
of starch with EPI is the most common method used in
Chemical modification of starch is being used to introduce
polysaccharide chemistry [4]. Reaction of starch with EPI
desirable properties to starch for specific applications.
gives distarch glycerols [5, 19]. The rate and extent of reac-
Cross-linking and substitution of starch are two such meth-
tion with EPI was studied by Hamerstrand et al. by deter-
ods utilized in food industry. Cross-linked starches con-
mining the quantity of unreacted EPI [5]. The theoretical
stitute a major class of modified starches. Cross-linking of
number of anhydroglucose units per cross-link was found to
starch by reaction with bi- or polyfunctional reagents is
vary from 50 to 2360. Rutledge et al. cross-linked rice with
widely used in numerous industrial applications such as
preparation of wet-rub-resistant starch paper coatings, EPI and developed a rice suitable for canning [6]. Kuniak and
Marchessault reported that depending upon conditions of
permanent textile sizes and water-resistant adhesives [2].
time, temperature and mole ratio of the reactants, 5 – 25% of
Cross-linking reinforces the already present hydrogen
the applied EPI is bound in the starch as a glycerol mono-
ether substituent [4]. Distarch glycerols are highly resistant
Correspondence: Alummoottil N. Jyothi, Division of Crop Utili-
to pH and mechanical shear due to the formation of ether
zation, Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Sreekariyam,
Thiruvananthapuram – 695 017, Kerala, India. E-mail: linkages between the cross-links and the hydroxyl groups in
sreejyothi_in@yahoo.com. the starch. The granules of root and tuber starches become
more highly hydrated upon heating in hot water and develop 2.2.2 Degree of cross-linking
higher peak viscosities than that of cereal starches. How-
ever, on prolonged heating, their viscosities drop sharply The degree of cross-linking of the modified starches was
and cause marked viscosity breakdown. It is also possible to determined from the viscosity values, according to the
minimize or prevent granule rupture and loss in viscosity by method of Chatakanonda et al. [7]. The peak viscosity of
cross-linking [2]. Literature available on the cross-linking the starch samples were recorded using a Rapid Visco
reaction of cassava starch with EPI is sparse and hence an Analyser (RVA-4, Newport Scientific, Warriewood, NSW,
attempt has been made to study systematically the mod- Australia). The starch slurry (10% by weight) was heated
ification of cassava starch with different concentrations of from 50 to 957C at 127C/min at 160 rpm, and was then
EPI in aqueous as well as non-aqueous media and charac- held at 957C for 2 min. Afterwards the paste was cooled to
terization of the products. Another objective was to investi- 507C at 127C/min and finally kept at 507C for 2 min. The
gate the effectiveness of a PTC in the cross-linking reaction degree of cross-linking was calculated as follows [7]:
of cassava starch under heterogeneous conditions. ½A B
Degree of cross-linking = 100
A
where, A is the peak viscosity in RV units of the native
2 Materials and Methods starch and B is that of the cross-linked starch.
2.2.5 In vitro enzyme digestibility Tab. 1. Degree of cross-linking of cassava starch mod-
ified with epichlorohydrin.
The in vitro a-amylase digestibility of the native and mod-
ified starches was determined using porcine pancreatic Sample Conc. of Medium Degree of
amylase with a digestibility unit of 500,000 (13.4 units EPI [%] cross-linking
amylase/ mg solids at pH 6–9, Sigma, St. Louis, USA)
S1 0.25 water ND#
according to the method of Singh et al., [13], modified by S2 0.50 water ND
Padmaja (personnel communication). The detailed pro- S3 0.75 water 35.960.81e
cedure has been described in a previous paper [14]. S4 1.0 water 82.460.89c
S5 0.25 water 1TBAB* ND
S6 0.50 water 1TBAB ND
2.2.6 Retrogradation (% syneresis) S7 0.75 water 1TBAB 82.460.06c
S8 1.0 water 1TBAB 95.360.08b
Starch suspension (2%, w/v) was heated at 85–907C for S9 0.25 DMF{ 9.361.45f
30 min in a water bath followed by rapid cooling in an ice S10 0.50 DMF 42.560.33d
bath to room temperature. The starch paste was stored for S11 0.75 DMF 95.660.20b
24, 48, 72, 96 and 102 days at 47C. Syneresis of the starch S12 1.0 DMF 99.660.02a
paste was measured as the percentage amount of water
released after centrifugation at 27006g for 15 min [15]. * Tetrabutylammonium bromide. { Dimethylformamide.
#
Not detectable.
the covalent cross-links may provide sufficient granule native starch. A significant positive correlation between the
integrity to keep the swollen granules intact and minimize or degree of cross-linking and swelling volume was seen. The
prevent loss in viscosity [2]. At lower levels of cross-linking use of a higher concentration of the EPI, which resulted in
the setback viscosity was found to be higher. This could be more cross-links, thereby imposed constraints on the
attributed to the observed low peak viscosity values. How- swelling behavior of the modified starches. The results are
ever, with an increase in the degree of cross-linking the set- also consistent with earlier reports [23, 24]. Liu et al. had
back viscosity also decreased. The final viscosities of most reported a considerable decrease in the swelling power of
of the cross-linked starches were observed to be signifi- cross-linked waxy rice starch [24]. According to Kartha and
cantly higher than that of the native starch. However, sam- Srivastava [17] with increase in the degree of cross-linking,
ples S4, S7, S8, S11 and S12 showed lower final viscosities, the granular structure of starch becomes more compact
which could again be correlated to the observed peak vis- and swelling and solubility are reduced.
cosity values for these samples. The pasting temperatures
All the cross-linked starches exhibited lower solubilities in
of the cross-linked starches were significantly increased in
water at 907C than the native starch (Tab. 3). The solubility
comparison to that of the native starch. Cross-linking of
decreased with an increase in reagent concentration,
molecular chains makes the starch granules more ordered
which could be attributed to the increase in the degree of
and consequently more energy would be required for swel-
cross-linking and is also consistent with the swelling
ling [17]. With increase in the level of cross-linking the gela-
properties observed. The solubility of the native starch
tinization temperature also increased. In the case of samples
was 20.2% and those of the modified starches in the
S11 and S12 no pasting temperature was recorded using RVA.
three sets of experiments were 3.2–14.4, 5.7–12.4 and
7.7–13.7%, respectively. Due to the strengthening of the
3.4 Swelling volume and solubility starch granules through cross-links, less disintegration
takes place during gelatinization and there is lowering of
The swelling volumes of the native and cross-linked solubles. Cross-linking reduces the solubles which leach
starches are shown in Tab. 3. The cross-linked starches out of the swollen granules on cooking and the extent of
showed lower swelling volumes in comparison to the solubilization is affected by the degree of cross-linking;
Tab. 3. The physicochemical properties and in vitro en- transmittance compared to the native starch. The starch
zyme digestibility of native and cross-linked cas- pastes treated with 1% EPI showed the lowest paste
sava starches. clarity. This could be explained on the basis of differences
in the swelling behavior. Granules held together by cross-
Sample Swelling Solubility Light Water Digesti-
links showed reduced swelling and the more dense gran-
vol. [%] transmit- binding bility [%]
[mL/g] tance [%] capacity [%] ules reflect light rather than transmit it, resulting in a lower
clarity [27–29]. The native starch granules had completely
S1 18.5b* 14.4a 8.9b 90.4c 74.7c disintegrated after gelatinization, whereas cross-linked
S2 15.5cd 10.9ef 6.1c 88.8c 68.8cd starches remained almost intact, thus reducing clarity [30].
S3 12.5efg 6.6gh 3.9ef 88.5c 58.3ef
S4 10.0gh 3.2i 3.6f 84.0d 54.7fg
S5 15.0cde 12.4cd 5.8c 98.7b 101.7a 3.7 In vitro enzyme digestibility
S6 14.0de 10.1f 4.4d 94.4b 97.7ab
S7 9.5h 6.0h 2.4hi 83.3d 71.4cd The modified starches with low degree of substitution exhib-
S8 9.0 h 5.7h 2.0i 75.8e 64.9de ited slightly higher digestibilities when compared to native
S9 17.0bc 13.7bc 4.3de 103.4a 90.3b
starch. However, there was a gradual decrease in the enzyme
S10 13.5def 13.7bc 4.1de 94.1b 73.1cd
susceptibility of cross-linked starches with increase in
S11 11.0fgh 11.9de 3.2g 84.3d 47.4g
S12 8.8h 7.7g 2.5h 84.5d 33.0h degree of cross-linking (Tab. 3). The samples S11 and S12
Native 27.0a 20.2a 22.6a 68.3f 72.6cd showed very low enzyme digestibilities (47.4 and 33%,
starch respectively). The decrease in enzyme susceptibility of
cross-linked starches could be attributed to the stabilization
* Means with the same superscripts are not significantly of starch granules through cross-links which inhibits the
different. action of a-amylase. Cross-linking within the level approved
for modified food starches is reported to have no significant
effect on the in vitro digestibility of the starch [2]. Walker and
the fewer the cross-links the higher would be the solubles
ElHarith have shown that cross-linking has no significant
[2]. According to earlier reports also, the cross-linked
effect on the digestibility of distarch phosphates [31].
starches exhibited a lower solubility than the native starch
According to Huber and BeMiller, the cross-linking of starch
[22, 24]. According to Liu et al., who observed lowering of
restricts the entrance of a-amylase through the channels that
solubility of cross-linked waxy rice starches, cross-linking
lead to the interior of cereal starches and therefore there was
restricts swelling of granules and will also lower solubility
a decrease in the enzyme digestibility [32]. The cross-linking
by increasing chain binding [24].
interferes with the formation of the a-amylase and starch
complex [33]. Because cross-linking of starch stabilizes the
3.5 Water-binding capacity granule structure and restricts swelling, highly cross-linked
starch is very difficult to hydrolyze by a-amylase [34].
The water-binding capacities of the native and cross-
linked starches are presented in Tab. 3. The modified
starches with higher degree of cross-linking exhibited a 3.8 Thermal properties
decrease in the WBC. However, in comparison to native
The DSC gelatinization parameters of the native and
starch (68.3%), the cross-linked starches exhibited higher
cross-linked cassava starches are shown in Tab. 4. All the
WBC values. On the other hand, Yook et al. has reported a
samples exhibited a decrease in gelatinization tempera-
decrease in the water uptake of rice starch upon cross-
tures, To, Tp and Te, except the sample S12, with the highest
linking with EPI [25]. Kaur observed a considerable low-
degree of cross-linking, for which the gelatinization tem-
ering of WBC of cross-linked potato starches in compar-
peratures were almost same as those of the native starch
ison to the native counterparts [22]. Choi and Kerr
(Tab. 4). However, in each set of the experiment, the
reported that cross-linking at low concentration of phos-
sample with higher degree of cross-linking exhibited
phorus oxychloride has little effect on the dynamic water
higher To and Tp values than those with lower degree of
properties of wheat starch [26].
cross-linking. Increased cross-linking caused a decrease
in Te for the modified starches except that the sample S12
3.6 Light transmittance (% T) had somewhat higher value than S11. The heat of gelati-
nization was increased with increase in the degree of
The light transmittance of the cross-linked starch disper- cross-linking. In comparison to native starch, all the
sion was lower than that of the native starch (Tab. 3). The modified starches, except S1 showed higher DH values.
higher the concentration of EPI used, the lower was the Heat of gelatinization reflects the energy required for dis-
[3] R. C. Hoseney: Starch, in Principles of Cereal Science and Catalysts, Phases – The Sachem Phase Transfer
Technology, 2nd ed. Am. Assoc. Cereal Chem. Inc., St. Paul, Catalysis review, issue (1). www.sacheminc.com/lifesciences/
Minnesota, 1994, 54–57. ptc/phases/Phaseso1.pdf()
[4] L. Kuniak, R. H. Marchessault: Study of the cross-linking [22] L. Kaur: Physicochemical properties of potatoes in relation
reaction between epichlorohydrin and starch. Stärke 1972, to thermal and functional properties of their starches. PhD
24, 110–116. Thesis, Guru Nanak Dev University, Punjab, India, 2004,
[5] G. E. Hamerstrand, B. T. Hofreiter, C. L. Mehltretter: Deter- 140–146.
mination of extent of reaction between epichlorohydrin and [23] J. B. Hirsch, J. L. Kokini: Understanding the mechanism of
starch. Cereal Chem. 1960, 37, 519. cross-linking agents (POCl3, STMP and EPI) through swel-
[6] J. E. Rutledge, M. N. Islam, W. H. James: Improved canning ling behavior and pasting properties of cross-linked waxy
stability of rice by chemical modification. Cereal Chem. maize starches. Cereal. Chem. 2002, 79, 102–107.
1972, 49, 430–436. [24] H. Liu, L. Ramsden, H. Corke: Physical properties of cross-
[7] P. Chatakanonda, S. Varavinit, P. Chinachoti: Relationship of linked and acetylated normal and waxy rice starch. Starch/
gelatinization and recrystallization of cross-linked rice to Stärke 1999, 51(7), 249–252.
glass transition temperature. Cereal. Chem. 2000, 77, 315– [25] C. Yook, U. H. Pek, K. H. Park: Gelatinization and retro-
319. gradation characteristics of hydroxypropylated and cross-
[8] G. B. Crosbie: The relationship between starch swelling linked rices. J. Food. Sci. 1993, 58, 405–407.
properties, paste viscosity and boiled noodle quality in [26] S. G. M. Choi, W. L. Kerr: Effects of chemical modification of
wheat flours. J. Cereal Sci. 1991, 13, 145–150. wheat starch on molecular mobility as studied by pulsed 1H-
[9] T. J. Schoch: Swelling power and solubility of granular NMR. Lebensm.-Wiss. Technol. 2003, 51, 1–8.
starches, in Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry (Eds. R. L. [27] I. Reddy, P. A. Seib: Modified waxy wheat starch compared
Whistler, J. R. Smith, M. L. Wolform) Academic Press, New to modified waxy corn starch. J. Cereal. Sci. 2000, 31, 25–
York, 1964. 39.
[10] L. A. Bello-Perez, O. Paredes-Lopez: Starch and amylo- [28] H. Lim, P. A. Seib: Location of phosphate esters in a wheat
pectin- Effects of solutes on clarity of pastes. Starch/Stärke starch phosphate by P-nuclear magnetic resonance spec-
1996, 48(6), 205–207. troscopy. Cereal Chem. 1993, 70, 145–152.
[11] W. T. Yamazaki: An alkaline water retention capacity test for [29] Y. Wu, P. A. Seib: Acetylated and hydroxypropylated dis-
the evaluation of cookie baking potentialities of soft winter tarch phosphates from waxy barley: paste properties and
wheat flour. Cereal Chem. 1953, 30, 242–246. freeze thaw stability. Cereal. Chem. 1990, 67, 202–208.
[12] D. G. Medcalf, K. A. Gilles: Wheat starches. 1. Comparison [30] K. Morikawa, K. Nishinari: Effect of concentration depend-
of physicochemical properties. Cereal Chem. 1965, 42, ence of retrogradation behavior of dispersions for native and
558–568. chemically modified potato starch. Food Hydrocoll. 2000,
[13] U. Singh, M. S. Kherdekar, R. Jambunathan: Studies on Desi 14, 395–401.
and Kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L) cultivars: The levels [31] R. Walker, E. A. ElHarith: Nutritional and toxicological prop-
of amylase inhibitors, levels of oligosaccharides and in- vitro erties of some raw and modified starches. Ann. Nutr. Ali-
starch digestibility. J. Food. Sci. 1982, 47, 510–512. ment. 1978, 32, 671.
[14] A. N. Jyothi, K. N. Rajasekharan, S. N. Moorthy, J. Sreeku- [32] K. C. Huber, J. N. BeMiller: Channels of maize and sorghum
mar: Synthesis and characterization of low DS succinate starch granules. Carbohydr. Polym. 2000, 41, 269–276.
derivatives of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) starch. [33] K. S. Woo, P. A. Seib: Cross-linked resistant starch: Prepa-
Starch/Stärke 2005, 57(7), 319–324. ration and properties. Cereal Chem. 2002, 79, 819–825.
[15] L. Kaur: Physicochemical properties of potatoes in relation [34] A.-I. Yeh, S.-L. Yeh: Some characteristics of hydroxy-
to thermal and functional properties of their starches. PhD propylated and cross-linked rice starch. Cereal Chem. 1993,
Thesis, Guru Nanak Dev University, Punjab, India, 2004, 59. 70(5), 596–601.
[16] H. T. Roberts, in Starch Chemistry and Technology (Ed. R. L. [35] M. Wootton, A. Bamunuarachchi: Application of differential
Whistler) Academic Press, New York, 1965, 482. scanning calorimetry to starch gelatinization I. Commercial
[17] K. P. R. Kartha, H. C. Srivastava: Reaction of epichlorohydrin native and modified starches. Starch Stärke 1979, 31, 201–
with carbohydrate polymers. Starch/Stärke 1985, 37, 297– 204.
306. [36] C. Perera, R. Hoover, A. M. Martin: The effect of hydroxy-
[18] C. M. Starks, C. L. Liotta, in Phase Transfer Catalysis: Prin- propylation on the structure and physicochemical properties
ciples and Techniques. Academic Press, New York, 1978. of native, defatted and heat moisture treated potato star-
[19] J. Berry, G. Gram, G. Decodts, A. Loupy, P. Pigeon, J. San- ches. Food Res. Int. 1997, 30, 235–247.
soulet: Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23(51), 5407. [37] P. Chatakanonda, S. Varavinit, P. Chinachoti: Effect of cross-
[20] H. C. Srivasthava: Starch research: The Indian perspective, linking on thermal and microscopic transitions of rice starch.
in New Developments in Carbohydrates and Related Natural Lebens.-Wiss. Technol. 2000, 33, 276–284.
Products (Eds. M. J. Mulky, A. Pandey) Oxford and IBH
Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, 1995, 34. (Received: October 28, 2005)
[21] W. H. Daly et al.,Polym. Sci. Technol. 1984, 24, 45, Cited in: E. (Revised: March 1, 2006)
V. Dehmlow: Tetramethylammonium Salts as Phase Transfer (Accepted: March 3, 2006)