Spd-Cal-003-105 - Load Flow Study - Rev 1

RELOKASI DPPU SUPADIO
PONTIANAK
NO. DOK Rev. : 1

LOAD FLOW STUDY
SPD-CAL-003-105 1 dari 5
PROYEK : RELOKASI DPPU SUPADIO
LOKASI : PONTIANAK – KALIMANTAN BARAT
PEMILIK : PT PERTAMINA (PERSERO) – DIREKTORAT
PEMASARAN
KONTRAKTOR : PT. INDRABAS PURNAMA MAKMUR

1 19 SEPT 16 For Approval

0 18 JULY 16 For Review
DIBUAT DIPERIKSA DISETUJUI
REV. TGL URAIAN
PT INDRABAS PURNAMA MAKMUR
PONTIANAK
NO. DOK Rev. : 1

LOAD FLOW STUDY

KONTROL REVISI
Rev Tanggal Uraian

0 18 JULY 16 For Review
1 19 SEPTEMBER 16 For Approval

PONTIANAK
NO. DOK Rev. : 1

LOAD FLOW STUDY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
1. GENERAL ........................................................................................................................ 4
2. REFERENCE DOCUMENTS ........................................................................................ 4
3. SYSTEM ANALYSIS SOFTWARE .............................................................................. 4
4. CALCULATION ............................................................................................................... 4
5. SUMMARY OF STUDY.................................................................................................. 5

PONTIANAK
NO. DOK Rev. : 1

LOAD FLOW STUDY
1. GENERAL
The purpose of this document is to provide load flow study in the RELOKASI DPPU
SUPADIO in Pontianak, Indonesia.
2. REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
Load flow study shall refer to:

a. Electrical Load Data Calculation SPD-CAL-003-104
b. Overall Single Line Diagram SPD-DWG-003-001-A3
c. Electrical Load Summary List SPD-LST-003-001
3. SYSTEM ANALYSIS SOFTWARE
This power load flow study is performed using computer software analysis program
ETAP 12.6.
1
4. CALCULATION
4.1 Calculation Method
The calculation is using load flow analysis which is based on Newton-Raphson

methodology. Load Flow Analysis calculates the bus voltages, branch power factors,
currents, and power flows throughout the electrical system, during steady state
condition.
4.2 Calculation Basis

1
The following are cases for Electrical system:
1) Case-1 (Normal Operation)
This plant is supplied from Grid PLN. All of Loads are energized.
2) Case-2 (Emergency Operation)
This Plant is supplied from Emergency Diesel Generator (redundant). Only

Emergency Loads are running.
The calculation is based on the electrical system shown in Attachment-2.

PONTIANAK
NO. DOK Rev. : 1

LOAD FLOW STUDY
5. SUMMARY OF STUDY
Result power flow and voltage drop can see in table below.
Table 1. Power Flow Summary
Case-1 (Normal) Case-2 (Emergency)

Equipment/Bus
Section V V
kW kVar A PF(%) kW kVar A PF(%)
Bus(%) Bus(%)
MV Switchgear 188 25 5.5 99.1 100.00 - - - - -
MCC Normal 186 22 288.1 99.3 98.76 - - - - -
MCC Emergency 105 53 180.8 89.3 98.76 103 52 177.2 89.3 99.27
EDG-1 - - - - - 104 52 177.2 89.4 100.00
Table 2. Voltage Drop Summary

Power Flow Case-1 Case-2
Voltage (kV)
From To Voltage Drop (%) Voltage Drop (%)
0.38 MV Switchgear MCC Normal 1.24 -
0.38 MV Switchgear MCC Emergency 1.24 -
0.38 EDG-1 MCC Emergency - 0.73
1
PONTIANAK
NO. DOK Rev. : 1

LOAD FLOW STUDY
ATTACHMENT-01
OVERALL SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM
One-Line Diagram - OLV1 (Load Flow Analysis)
GRID 20 KV
1 MVAsc
CB-M1
MV Switchgear 188 kW
20 kV 25 kvar 100%
188 kW
CB-M2 25 kvar DEG-1 DEG-2
120 kW 120 kW
T1
0,4 MVA
CB-L1 CB-L2 CB-L3

Open Open
MCC-N MCC-E
6% 6%
0,38 kV 98,7 0,38 kV 98,7
0 kW 14 kW 24 kW 10 kW 2 kW 0,25 kW 13 kW 18 kW 105 kW 4 kW 14 kW 24 kW 0,25 kW 0,49 kW 22 kW 3 kW 13 kW 2 kW 9 kW 13 kW

73 kvar 8 kvar 12 kvar 6 kvar 1 kvar 0,12 kvar 6 kvar 9 kvar 53 kvar 2 kvar 8 kvar 12 kvar 0,12 kvar 0,24 kvar 11 kvar 1 kvar 6 kvar 1 kvar 4 kvar 6 kvar
CBL-C CBL1-1 CBL1-2 CBL1-3 CBL1-4 CBL1-5 CBL1-6 CBL1-7 CBL2-1 CBL2-2 CBL2-3 CBL2-4 CBL2-5 CBL2-6 CBL2-7 CBL2-8 CBL2-9 CBL2-10 CBL2-11
CB1
CAP1
150 kvar
RP-102 SP-302 SLP-401 DP-501 MOV-02 DB-01 DB-04 WO-01 RP-101 SP-301 MOV-01 A-501 PS-01 BC-01 UPS-01 JP-701 DB-02 DB-03
11 kW 18,5 kW 7,5 kW 3 kW 0,56 kVA 15 kVA 20 kVA 5 kVA 11 kW 18,5 kW 0,56 kVA 1,1 kVA 25 kVA 3 kVA 15 kVA 15 kW 10 kVA 15 kVA
page 1 23:02:52 Sep 18, 2016 Project File: DPPU_ETAP

One-Line Diagram - OLV1 (Load Flow Analysis)
GRID 20 KV
1 MVAsc
CB-M1
MV SwitchgearOpen
20 kV
CB-M2 DEG-1 DEG-2

Open 120 kW 120 kW
104 kW
52 kvar
T1
0,4 MVA
CB-L1 CB-L2 CB-L3

Open Open
MCC-N MCC-E 103 kW 7%
0,38 kV 0,38 kV 52 kvar 99,2
2 kW 14 kW 24 kW 0,25 kW 0,49 kW 22 kW 3 kW 13 kW 2 kW 9 kW 13 kW
1 kvar 8 kvar 12 kvar 0,12 kvar 0,24 kvar 11 kvar 1 kvar 6 kvar 1 kvar 4 kvar 6 kvar
CBL-C CBL1-1 CBL1-2 CBL1-3 CBL1-4 CBL1-5 CBL1-6 CBL1-7 CBL2-1 CBL2-2 CBL2-3 CBL2-4 CBL2-5 CBL2-6 CBL2-7 CBL2-8 CBL2-9 CBL2-10 CBL2-11
CB1
Open
CAP1
150 kvar
RP-102 SP-302 SLP-401 DP-501 MOV-02 DB-01 DB-04 WO-01 RP-101 SP-301 MOV-01 A-501 PS-01 BC-01 UPS-01 JP-701 DB-02 DB-03
11 kW 18,5 kW 7,5 kW 3 kW 0,56 kVA 15 kVA 20 kVA 5 kVA 11 kW 18,5 kW 0,56 kVA 1,1 kVA 25 kVA 3 kVA 15 kVA 15 kW 10 kVA 15 kVA
page 1 23:09:08 Sep 18, 2016 Project File: DPPU_ETAP

PONTIANAK
NO. DOK Rev. : 1

LOAD FLOW STUDY
ATTACHMENT-02
LOAD FLOW STUDY REPORT
Project: DPPU
ETAP Page: 1
12.6.0H
Location: Pontianak Date: 18-09-2016
Contract: SN: IPM
Engineer: GIL Revision: Base
Study Case: LF
Filename: DPPU_ETAP Config.: Normal
Electrical Transient Analyzer Program
Load Flow Analysis
Loading Category (1): Design
Generation Category (1): Design
Load Diversity Factor: None
Swing V-Control Load Total
Number of Buses: 1 0 2 3
XFMR2 XFMR3 Reactor Line/Cable Impedance Tie PD Total
Number of Branches: 1 0 0 0 0 1 2
Method of Solution: Adaptive Newton-Raphson Method
Maximum No. of Iteration: 99
Precision of Solution: 0.0001000
System Frequency: 50.00 Hz
Unit System: Metric
Project Filename: DPPU_ETAP
Output Filename: D:\06. DPPU\04. Calculation\05. LOAD FLOW STUDY\00. ETAP\LF.lfr

Project: DPPU
ETAP Page: 2
12.6.0H
Contract: SN: IPM
Study Case: LF
Adjustments
Apply Individual
Tolerance Adjustments /Global Percent
Transformer Impedance: Yes Individual
Reactor Impedance: Yes Individual
Overload Heater Resistance: No
Transmission Line Length: No
Cable Length: No
Apply Individual
Temperature Correction Adjustments /Global Degree C
Transmission Line Resistance: Yes Individual
Cable Resistance: Yes Individual

Project: DPPU
ETAP Page: 3
12.6.0H
Contract: SN: IPM
Study Case: LF
Bus Input Data
Load
Bus Initial Voltage Constant kVA Constant Z Constant I Generic
ID kV Sub-sys % Mag. Ang. MW Mvar MW Mvar MW Mvar MW Mvar
MCC-E 0.380 1 100.0 0.0 0.040 0.021 0.066 0.032
MCC-N 0.380 1 100.0 0.0 0.050 0.027 0.032 -0.060
MV Switchgear 20.000 1 100.0 0.0
Total Number of Buses: 3 0.091 0.049 0.098 -0.028 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Generation Bus Voltage Generation Mvar Limits

ID kV Type Sub-sys % Mag. Angle MW Mvar % PF Max Min
MV Switchgear 20.000 Swing 1 100.0 0.0
0.000 0.000
Project: DPPU
ETAP Page: 4
12.6.0H
Contract: SN: IPM
Study Case: LF
2-Winding Transformer Input Data
Transformer Rating Z Variation % Tap Setting Adjusted Phase Shift

ID Phase MVA Prim. kV Sec. kV % Z1 X1/R1 + 5% - 5% % Tol. Prim. Sec. %Z Type Angle
T1 3-Phase 0.400 20.000 0.380 4.00 1.50 0 0 0 0 0 4.0000 Dy 0.000

Project: DPPU
ETAP Page: 5
12.6.0H
Contract: SN: IPM
Study Case: LF
Branch Connections
CKT/Branch Connected Bus ID % Impedance, Pos. Seq., 100 MVA Base

ID Type From Bus To Bus R X Z Y
T1 2W XFMR MV Switchgear MCC-N 554.70 832.05 1000.00
CB1 Tie Breakr MCC-N MCC-E

Project: DPPU
ETAP Page: 6
12.6.0H
Contract: SN: IPM
Study Case: LF
LOAD FLOW REPORT
Bus Voltage Generation Load Load Flow XFMR

ID kV % Mag. Ang. MW Mvar MW Mvar ID MW Mvar Amp %PF %Tap
MCC-E 0.380 98.760 -0.8 0 0 0.105 0.053 MCC-N -0.105 -0.053 180.8 89.3
MCC-N 0.380 98.760 -0.8 0 0 0.081 -0.031 MV Switchgear -0.186 -0.022 288.1 99.3
MCC-E 0.105 0.053 180.8 89.3
* MV Switchgear 20.000 100.000 0.0 0.188 0.025 0 0 MCC-N 0.188 0.025 5.5 99.1
* Indicates a voltage regulated bus (voltage controlled or swing type machine connected to it)
# Indicates a bus with a load mismatch of more than 0.1 MVA
Project: DPPU
ETAP Page: 7
12.6.0H
Contract: SN: IPM
Study Case: LF
Bus Loading Summary Report
Directly Connected Load Total Bus Load
Bus Constant kVA Constant Z Constant I Generic

Percent
ID kV Rated Amp MW Mvar MW Mvar MW Mvar MW Mvar MVA % PF Amp Loading
MCC-E 0.380 0.040 0.021 0.065 0.031 0 0 0 0 0.117 89.3 180.8

MCC-N 0.380 0.050 0.027 0.031 -0.058 0 0 0 0 0.209 89.0 321.4
MV Switchgear 20.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.190 99.1 5.5
* Indicates operating load of a bus exceeds the bus critical limit ( 100.0% of the Continuous Ampere rating).
# Indicates operating load of a bus exceeds the bus marginal limit ( 95.0% of the Continuous Ampere rating).
Project: DPPU
ETAP Page: 8
12.6.0H
Contract: SN: IPM
Study Case: LF
Branch Loading Summary Report
Transformer
CKT / Branch Cable & Reactor
Ampacity Loading Capability Loading (input) Loading (output)
ID Type (Amp) Amp % (MVA) MVA % MVA %
T1 Transformer 0.400 0.190 47.4 0.187 46.8
* Indicates a branch with operating load exceeding the branch capability.

Project: DPPU
ETAP Page: 9
12.6.0H
Contract: SN: IPM
Study Case: LF
Branch Losses Summary Report
Vd
CKT / Branch From-To Bus Flow To-From Bus Flow Losses % Bus Voltage
% Drop
ID MW Mvar MW Mvar kW kvar From To in Vmag
T1 -0.186 -0.022 0.188 0.025 2.0 3.0 98.8 100.0 1.24
2.0 3.0
Project: DPPU
ETAP Page: 10
12.6.0H
Contract: SN: IPM
Study Case: LF
Alert Summary Report
% Alert Settings
Critical Marginal
Loading
Bus 100.0 95.0
Cable 100.0 95.0
Reactor 100.0 95.0
Line 100.0 95.0
Transformer 100.0 95.0
Panel 100.0 95.0
Protective Device 100.0 95.0
Generator 100.0 95.0
Inverter/Charger 100.0 95.0
Bus Voltage
OverVoltage 105.0 102.0
UnderVoltage 95.0 97.0
Generator Excitation
OverExcited (Q Max.) 100.0 95.0
UnderExcited (Q Min.) 100.0
Project: DPPU
ETAP Page: 11
12.6.0H
Contract: SN: IPM
Study Case: LF
SUMMARY OF TOTAL GENERATION , LOADING & DEMAND
MW Mvar MVA % PF
Source (Swing Buses): 0.188 0.025 0.190 99.13 Lagging
Source (Non-Swing Buses): 0.000 0.000 0.000
Total Demand: 0.188 0.025 0.190 99.13 Lagging
Total Motor Load: 0.091 0.049 0.103 87.99 Lagging
Total Static Load: 0.095 -0.027 0.099 96.23 Leading
Total Constant I Load: 0.000 0.000 0.000
Total Generic Load: 0.000 0.000 0.000
Apparent Losses: 0.002 0.003
System Mismatch: 0.000 0.000
Number of Iterations: 1
Project: DPPU
ETAP Page: 1
12.6.0H
Contract: SN: IPM
Study Case: LF
Filename: DPPU_ETAP Config.: Emergency
Electrical Transient Analyzer Program
Load Flow Analysis
Loading Category (1): Design
Generation Category (1): Design
Load Diversity Factor: None
Swing V-Control Load Total
Number of Buses: 1 0 1 2
XFMR2 XFMR3 Reactor Line/Cable Impedance Tie PD Total
Number of Branches: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
Method of Solution: Adaptive Newton-Raphson Method
Maximum No. of Iteration: 99
Precision of Solution: 0.0001000
System Frequency: 50.00 Hz
Unit System: Metric
Project Filename: DPPU_ETAP
Output Filename: D:\06. DPPU\04. Calculation\05. LOAD FLOW STUDY\00. ETAP\LF.lfr

Project: DPPU
ETAP Page: 2
12.6.0H
Contract: SN: IPM
Study Case: LF
Adjustments
Apply Individual
Tolerance Adjustments /Global Percent
Transformer Impedance: Yes Individual
Reactor Impedance: Yes Individual
Overload Heater Resistance: No
Transmission Line Length: No
Cable Length: No
Apply Individual
Temperature Correction Adjustments /Global Degree C
Transmission Line Resistance: Yes Individual
Cable Resistance: Yes Individual

Project: DPPU
ETAP Page: 3
12.6.0H
Contract: SN: IPM
Study Case: LF
Bus Input Data
Load
Bus Initial Voltage Constant kVA Constant Z Constant I Generic
ID kV Sub-sys % Mag. Ang. MW Mvar MW Mvar MW Mvar MW Mvar
Bus1 0.380 2 100.0 0.0
MCC-E 0.380 2 100.0 0.0 0.040 0.021 0.064 0.031
Total Number of Buses: 2 0.040 0.021 0.064 0.031 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Generation Bus Voltage Generation Mvar Limits

ID kV Type Sub-sys % Mag. Angle MW Mvar % PF Max Min
Bus1 0.380 Swing 2 100.0 0.0
0.000 0.000
Project: DPPU
ETAP Page: 4
12.6.0H
Contract: SN: IPM
Study Case: LF
Line/Cable Input Data
Ohms or Siemens/1000 m per Conductor (Cable) or per Phase (Line)

Line/Cable Length
ID Library Size Adj. (m) % Tol. #/Phase T (C) R X Y
Cable1 1,0NCUN4 120 45.0 0.0 1 75 0.186940 0.073000 0.0001499
Line / Cable resistances are listed at the specified temperatures.

Project: DPPU
ETAP Page: 5
12.6.0H
Contract: SN: IPM
Study Case: LF
Branch Connections
CKT/Branch Connected Bus ID % Impedance, Pos. Seq., 100 MVA Base

ID Type From Bus To Bus R X Z Y
Cable1 Cable Bus1 MCC-E 582.57 227.49 625.41 0.0000010

Project: DPPU
ETAP Page: 6
12.6.0H
Contract: SN: IPM
Study Case: LF
LOAD FLOW REPORT
Bus Voltage Generation Load Load Flow XFMR

ID kV % Mag. Ang. MW Mvar MW Mvar ID MW Mvar Amp %PF %Tap
* Bus1 0.380 100.000 0.0 0.104 0.052 0 0 MCC-E 0.104 0.052 177.2 89.4
MCC-E 0.380 99.274 0.0 0 0 0.103 0.052 Bus1 -0.103 -0.052 177.2 89.3
* Indicates a voltage regulated bus (voltage controlled or swing type machine connected to it)
# Indicates a bus with a load mismatch of more than 0.1 MVA
Project: DPPU
ETAP Page: 7
12.6.0H
Contract: SN: IPM
Study Case: LF
Bus Loading Summary Report
Directly Connected Load Total Bus Load
Bus Constant kVA Constant Z Constant I Generic

Percent
ID kV Rated Amp MW Mvar MW Mvar MW Mvar MW Mvar MVA % PF Amp Loading
Bus1 0.380 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.117 89.4 177.2

MCC-E 0.380 0.040 0.021 0.063 0.031 0 0 0 0 0.116 89.3 177.2
* Indicates operating load of a bus exceeds the bus critical limit ( 100.0% of the Continuous Ampere rating).
# Indicates operating load of a bus exceeds the bus marginal limit ( 95.0% of the Continuous Ampere rating).
Project: DPPU
ETAP Page: 8
12.6.0H
Contract: SN: IPM
Study Case: LF
Project: DPPU
ETAP Page: 9
12.6.0H
Contract: SN: IPM
Study Case: LF
Branch Losses Summary Report
Vd
CKT / Branch From-To Bus Flow To-From Bus Flow Losses % Bus Voltage
% Drop
ID MW Mvar MW Mvar kW kvar From To in Vmag
Cable1 0.104 0.052 -0.103 -0.052 0.8 0.3 100.0 99.3 0.73
0.8 0.3
Project: DPPU
ETAP Page: 10
12.6.0H
Contract: SN: IPM
Study Case: LF
Alert Summary Report
% Alert Settings
Critical Marginal
Loading
Bus 100.0 95.0
Cable 100.0 95.0
Reactor 100.0 95.0
Line 100.0 95.0
Transformer 100.0 95.0
Panel 100.0 95.0
Protective Device 100.0 95.0
Generator 100.0 95.0
Inverter/Charger 100.0 95.0
Bus Voltage
OverVoltage 105.0 102.0
UnderVoltage 95.0 97.0
Generator Excitation
OverExcited (Q Max.) 100.0 95.0
UnderExcited (Q Min.) 100.0
Project: DPPU
ETAP Page: 11
12.6.0H
Contract: SN: IPM
Study Case: LF
SUMMARY OF TOTAL GENERATION , LOADING & DEMAND
MW Mvar MVA % PF
Source (Swing Buses): 0.104 0.052 0.117 89.36 Lagging
Source (Non-Swing Buses): 0.000 0.000 0.000
Total Demand: 0.104 0.052 0.117 89.36 Lagging
Total Motor Load: 0.040 0.021 0.046 88.25 Lagging
Total Static Load: 0.063 0.031 0.070 90.00 Lagging
Total Constant I Load: 0.000 0.000 0.000
Total Generic Load: 0.000 0.000 0.000
Apparent Losses: 0.001 0.000
System Mismatch: 0.000 0.000
Number of Iterations: 1

Spd-Cal-003-105 - Load Flow Study - Rev 1

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originalbeschreibung:

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Spd-Cal-003-105 - Load Flow Study - Rev 1

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

RELOKASI DPPU SUPADIO

NO. DOK Rev. : 1

PROYEK : RELOKASI DPPU SUPADIO

LOKASI : PONTIANAK – KALIMANTAN BARAT

PEMILIK : PT PERTAMINA (PERSERO) – DIREKTORAT

KONTRAKTOR : PT. INDRABAS PURNAMA MAKMUR

1 19 SEPT 16 For Approval

NO. DOK Rev. : 1

Rev Tanggal Uraian

1 19 SEPTEMBER 16 For Approval

NO. DOK Rev. : 1

1. GENERAL ........................................................................................................................ 4

2. REFERENCE DOCUMENTS ........................................................................................ 4

3. SYSTEM ANALYSIS SOFTWARE .............................................................................. 4

4. CALCULATION ............................................................................................................... 4

5. SUMMARY OF STUDY.................................................................................................. 5

NO. DOK Rev. : 1

Load flow study shall refer to:

3. SYSTEM ANALYSIS SOFTWARE

4.1 Calculation Method

The calculation is using load flow analysis which is based on Newton-Raphson

4.2 Calculation Basis

The following are cases for Electrical system:

1) Case-1 (Normal Operation)

2) Case-2 (Emergency Operation)

This Plant is supplied from Emergency Diesel Generator (redundant). Only

The calculation is based on the electrical system shown in Attachment-2.

NO. DOK Rev. : 1

Table 1. Power Flow Summary

Case-1 (Normal) Case-2 (Emergency)

Table 2. Voltage Drop Summary

NO. DOK Rev. : 1

CB-L1 CB-L2 CB-L3

0 kW 14 kW 24 kW 10 kW 2 kW 0,25 kW 13 kW 18 kW 105 kW 4 kW 14 kW 24 kW 0,25 kW 0,49 kW 22 kW 3 kW 13 kW 2 kW 9 kW 13 kW

page 1 23:02:52 Sep 18, 2016 Project File: DPPU_ETAP

CB-M2 DEG-1 DEG-2

CB-L1 CB-L2 CB-L3

page 1 23:09:08 Sep 18, 2016 Project File: DPPU_ETAP

NO. DOK Rev. : 1

Electrical Transient Analyzer Program

Load Flow Analysis

Loading Category (1): Design

Generation Category (1): Design

Load Diversity Factor: None

Swing V-Control Load Total

XFMR2 XFMR3 Reactor Line/Cable Impedance Tie PD Total

Method of Solution: Adaptive Newton-Raphson Method

Maximum No. of Iteration: 99

Precision of Solution: 0.0001000

System Frequency: 50.00 Hz

Unit System: Metric

Project Filename: DPPU_ETAP

Output Filename: D:\06. DPPU\04. Calculation\05. LOAD FLOW STUDY\00. ETAP\LF.lfr

Transformer Impedance: Yes Individual

Reactor Impedance: Yes Individual

Overload Heater Resistance: No

Transmission Line Length: No

Transmission Line Resistance: Yes Individual

Cable Resistance: Yes Individual

Bus Input Data

ID kV Sub-sys % Mag. Ang. MW Mvar MW Mvar MW Mvar MW Mvar

MCC-E 0.380 1 100.0 0.0 0.040 0.021 0.066 0.032