In this experiment, we would like to determine if reading-
out-loud can help someone memorize words better than
silent reading. Twenty-nine (29) students participated in the experiment. They were asked to read sight-words for 3 minutes and instructed to write all the words they had remembered for another three minutes. After this, another set of sight-words were shown. This time, the participants were allowed to read-out-loud the words for 3 minutes.
H0: The mean pre-test score is equal to the mean post-test
scores. The mean number of words memorized using silent reading is the same as the mean number of words memorized using reading-out-loud. H1: The mean pre-test score is not equal to the mean post- test scores. The mean number of words memorized using silent reading is different from the mean number of words memorized using reading-out-loud.
Table 1. Result of the test difference between pre-test and
post-test Mean SD t p Pre-test 15.97 3.98 -2.67 0.012 Post-test 18.34 4.70 df=28 The difference between the mean pre-test (M=15.97, SD=3.98) and mean post-test (M=18.34, SD=4.70) scores is significant, t ( 28 ) =−2.67 , p<0.05 . The difference between the mean pre-test (M=15.97, SD=3.98) and mean post-test (M=18.34, SD=4.70) scores is significant, t ( 28 ) =−2.67 , p=0.012 . Therefore, reading-out-loud is a better technique in memorizing sight words. In this experiment, we would like to determine if telling students that they will receive additional points on the next exam affects their performance.
H0: The mean number of words memorized by Group 1
(without reward) is the same as the mean number of words memorized by group 2 (with reward). H1: The mean number of words memorized by Group 1 (without reward) is different from the mean number of words memorized by group 2 (with reward).
Table 1. Result of the test difference
Mean SD t p Group 1 17 4.31 -1.64 0.112 Group 2 19.79 4.82 df=27 The difference between the mean number of words memorized by Group 1 (without reward) (M=17, SD=4.31) and mean number of words memorized by group 2 (with reward) (M=19.79, SD=4.82) is not significant, t ( 27 )=−1.64, p=0.112 . Therefore, giving rewards does not affect the performance of the students.