Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Sweetman, C. (ed). (1998) Gender and migration. Oxford: Oxfam. Participatory enquiry
Walters, B. (1998) Integrating gender analysis into macroeconomic Chambers, R. & J. Blackburn (1996) ‘The power of participation:
theory. Paris: OECD. PRA and policy’. IDS Policy Brief. Issue 7 (August). Brighton:
Useful websites on gender IDS.
www.un.org/womenwatch Hope, A. & S. Timmel (1995) Training for transformation: A
www.worldbank.org/gender/ handbook for community workers., Gweru, Zimbabwe: Mambo
www.cgiar.org:80/ifpri/themes/mp17/gender/gender.htm Press.
www.eurosur.org/wide/porteng.htm Mitlin, D. & J. Thomson (eds). (1994) RRA notes 21: Special issue
www.focusintl.com/widnet.htm on participatory tools and methods in urban areas. London:
DFID gender mainstreaming resource (GEM) on DFID intranet IIED.
Pretty, J., I. Guijt, J. Thompson & I. Scoones (1995) Participatory
Livelihood strategies and diversification learning and action: A trainers guide. London: IIED.
Adams, R. & J. He (1995) ‘Sources of income inequality and poverty Rennie, K. & N. Singh (1995) Participatory research for sustainable
in rural Pakistan’. Research Report No.102. Washington, D.C.: livelihoods. A guidebook for field projects. Winnipeg: IISD.
IFPRI. Slocum, R. et al. (1995) Power, process and participation: Tools for
Dercon, S. & P. Krishnan (1996) ‘Income portfolios in rural Ethiopia change. London: IT Publications.
and Tanzania: Choices and constraints’. Journal of Development Thomas, A. et al. (eds). (1998) Finding out fast: Investigative skills
Studies. Vol.32, No.6, pp.850–75. for policy and development. London: Sage/Open University.
Ellis, F. (1998) ‘Household strategies and rural livelihood
Participatory poverty assessments
diversification’. Journal of Development Studies. Vol.35, No.1,
pp.1–38. Brocklesby, M.A. & J. Holland (1998) Participatory poverty
Leones, J. & S. Feldman (1998) ‘Nonfarm activity and rural assessments and public services: Key messages from the poor.
household income: Evidence from Philippine microdata’. London: DFID.
Economic Development and Cultural Change. Vol.46, No.4, Hanmer, L., G. Pyatt & H. White (1997) Poverty in sub-Saharan
Africa: What can we learn from the World Bank’s poverty
pp.789–806.
assessments? The Hague: Institute of Social Studies.
Reardon, T. (1997) ‘Using evidence of household income
Holland, J. & J. Blackburn (1998) Whose voice? Participatory
diversification to inform study of the rural nonfarm labour
research and policy change. London: IT Publications.
market in Africa’. World Development. Vol.25, No.5, pp.735–
Narayan, D. et al. (1999) Can anyone hear us? Voices from 47
47.
countries. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. (Available at
Logical frameworks www.worldbank.org/poverty/voices/reports.htm)
Farrington, J. & J. Nelson (1997) ‘Using log frames to monitor and Robb, C. (1999) Can the poor influence policy? PPAs in the
review farmer participatory research’. Agricultural Research and developing world. (Available at: www.worldbank.org/html/
Extension Network No.73. London: ODI. extpb/canpoor/frntmat.pdf )
Team Technologies (1994) Teams and project design: TeamUP Policy, institutions and processes
workbook. Washington, D.C.: Team Technologies Inc.
Beckhart and Harris (1987) Organisational transitions:
Monitoring and evaluation managing complex changes. Addison-Wesley.
Abbott, J. & I. Guijt (1998) ‘Changing views on change: Burki, S. & G.,Perry (1991) Beyond the Washing ton Consensus:
Participatory approaches to monitoring the environment’. SARL Institutions matter. Washington: World Bank
Discussion Paper No.2. London: IIED. DFID Technical Notes:
Ashley, C. & K. Hussein (2000). ‘Developing methodologies for No.10 – Taking account of good government.
livelihood impact assessment’. Working Paper 129. London: ODI. No.14 – Institutional development.
Casely, D.J. & K. Kumar (1987) Project monitoring and evaluation DFID (2000) Strategies for achieving the International
in agriculture. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Development Targets: Making Government work for Poor
Gujit, I. (1998) ‘Participatory monitoring and impact assessment People. London: DFID.
of sustainable agriculture initiatives: An introduction to the Greeley, M. & R. Jenkins (1999) Poverty reduction processes and
key elements’. SARL Discussion Paper No.1. London: IIED. institutions. DFID and Sida. (Available through IDS, Brighton.)
Jenkins, G.P. (1999) ‘Evaluation of stakeholder impacts in cost- Grindle, M. & J. Thomas (1991) Public choices and policy changes:
benefit analysis’. Impact assessment and project appraisal. the political economy of reform in developing countries.
Vol.17, No.2, pp.87–96. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press
Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets
Hobley, M. & D. Shield (2000) ‘The reality of trying to transform Useful websites for policy and institutional issues
structures and process: Forestry and rural livelihoods’. Working www.oneworld.org/ecdpm/index.htm
Paper No 132. London: ODI. www.bham.ac.uk/IDD/
Hyden, G. (1998) Governance and sustainable livelihoods:
Qualitative and quantitative methods
challenges and opportunities. Paper commissioned by UNDP.
(Available at www.undp.org/sl/Documents/documents.htm). Booth, D. et al. (1998) Participation and combined methods in
Hyden, G. (1998) Governance for sustainable livelihoods: African poverty assessment: Renewing the agenda. London:
operational issues. Paper commissioned by UNDP. (Available DFID.
at www.undp.org/sl/Documents/documents.htm). Carvalho, S. & H. White (1997) ‘Combining the quantitative and
Johnson, C. (1997) ‘Rules, norms and the pursuit of sustainable qualitative approaches to poverty measurement and analysis’.
livelihoods’. IDS Working Paper No.52. Brighton: IDS. World Bank Technical Paper 366. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
Manor, J. (2000) ‘Decentralisation and Sustainable Livelihoods’ Marsland N. et al. (1998) A methodological framework for
PIP paper. (Available at http://www.livelihoods.org/pip/pip/ combining quantitative and qualitative survey methods.
dcintro.html) Chatham: NRI, University of Greenwich & Reading Statistical
Mehta, L. et al. (1999) ‘Exploring understandings of institutions Services Centre.
and uncertainy: New directions in natural resource Rights based approaches
management’. IDS Discussion Paper No.372. Brighton: IDS. Ferguson, C. (1999) Global social policy principles: Human rights
Moore, M. & J. Putzel (1999) ‘Thinking strategically about politics and social justice. London: DFID.
and poverty’. IDS Working Paper No.99. Brighton: IDS. Hausermann, J. (1998) A human rights approach to development.
North, D.C. (1991) Institutions , institutional change and economic London: Rights and Humanity.
performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Manji, F. (1998) Development and rights. Oxford: Oxfam.
Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of
Moser, C. et al. (forthcoming 2001) To claim our rights: livelihoods
institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge
security, human rights and sustainable development. London:
University Press.
ODI.
Rew, A. & A. Brustinov (1998) ‘The resolution and validation od
ODI (1999) ‘What can we do with a rights-based approached to
policy reform: illustrations from Indian forestry and Russian
development?’ Briefing Paper 1999(3). London: ODI.
land privatisation’. In Mosse, D. et al. (eds), Development as
Process: concepts and methods for working with complexity. Risk and vulnerability
London: Routledge. Blaikie, P., T. Cannon, I. Davis & B. Wisner (1994) At risk: Natural
Robinson, M. & G. White (eds). (1998) The democratic hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. London:
developmental state: Political and institutional design. Oxford: Routledge.
OUP. Davies, S. (1996) Adaptable livelihoods: Coping with food insecurity
Roe, E.M. (1998) Policy Analysis adn formualtion for sustainable in the Malian Sahel. London: Macmillan Press.
livelihoods. (Available at www.undp.org/sl/Documents/ Davies, S. & N. Hossain (1997) ‘Livelihood adaptation, public action
documents.htm) and civil society’. IDS Working Paper No.57. Brighton: IDS.
Schneider, H. (1999) Participatory governance: The missing link Periperi Publications (1999) Risk, sustainable development and
for poverty reduction. Paris: OECD. disasters: Southern perspectives. Cape Town: Periperi
Shankland, A. (2000) ‘Analysing Policy for Sustainable Livelihoods’. Publications, University of Cape Town.
IDS Research Report. Brighton: IDS.
Sutton, R (1999) ‘The policy process’. Working Paper No118. London: ODI. Useful websites on risk and vulnerability
Thomson, A. (2000) Changing Policy-Making Processes. www.careinternational.org.uk/projects/projects.html
Contribution to e-mail discussion group. (Available at Rural–urban livelihoods / peri-urban
www.livelihoods.org/pip/discus2.html) Evans, H.E. & P. Ngau (1991) ‘Rural–urban relations, household
UNDP (1998) Governance for SL: Operational issues and Policy income diversification and agricultural productivity’.
analysis and formulation for sustainable livelihoods. (Both
Development and Change. Vol.22, pp.519–45.
available at www.undp.org/sl/Documents/documents.htm)
Rakodi, C. (1999) ‘Poverty in the peri-urban interface’. NRSP
Watson, D. (2000) Governance, Sustainable Livelihoods and PIP.
Research Advances No.5. London: DFID.
Contribution on governance to e-mail discussion group prior
Tacoli, C. (1998) ‘Rural–urban linkages and sustainable rural
to PIP meeting. (Available at www.livelihoods.org/pip/pip/
livelihoods’. In Carney, D. (ed). Sustainable rural livelihoods:
discus3.html)
What contribution can we make? London: DFID.
Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets
These Guidance Sheets aim to stimulate reflection and learning. October 2001
Readers are encouraged to send comments and contributions to: livelihoods@dfid.gov.uk