Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Aij 6.7725 0
Aji -3.8423 0
Cij 0 0
Cji 0 0
Dij 0 0
Dji 0 0
Eij 0 0
Eji 0 0
Φ𝑖 𝑧 𝜃𝑖 𝜃 ′𝑗 𝜏𝑖𝑗 Φ𝑖
𝑙𝑛𝛾𝑖 = 𝑙𝑛 + 𝑞𝑖 𝑙𝑛 − 𝑞 ′ 𝑖 𝑙𝑛𝑡 ′ 𝑖 − 𝑞 ′ 𝑖 ∑ ′ + 𝑙𝑖 + 𝑞 ′ 𝑖 − ∑ 𝑥𝑗 𝑙𝑗
𝑥𝑖 2 Φ𝑖 𝑡𝑗 𝑥𝑖
𝑗 𝑗
𝑞𝑖 𝑥𝑖 𝑞 ′𝑖 𝑥𝑖 𝑟𝑖 𝑥𝑖
𝜃𝑖 = ; 𝑞𝑇 = ∑𝑘 𝑞𝑘 𝑥𝑘 ; 𝜃 ′ 𝑖 = ; 𝑞 ′ 𝑇 = ∑𝑘 𝑞 ′ 𝑘 𝑥𝑘 ; Φ𝑖 = ; 𝑟𝑇 = ∑𝑘 𝑟𝑘 𝑥𝑘
𝑞𝑇 𝑞 ′𝑇 𝑟𝑇
𝑧
𝑙𝑖 = (𝑟𝑖 − 𝑞𝑖 ) + 1 − 𝑟𝑖 ; 𝑡 ′ 𝑖 = ∑𝑘 𝜃 ′ 𝑘 𝜏𝑘𝑖 ; 𝜏𝑖𝑗 = 𝑒𝑥𝑝(𝑎𝑖𝑗 + 𝑏𝑖𝑗 ⁄𝑇 + 𝑐𝑖𝑗 𝑙𝑛𝑇 + 𝑑𝑖𝑗 𝑇 + 𝑒𝑖𝑗 ⁄𝑇 2 ); 𝑧 = 10
2
*Corresponding author.
1
Table A2. NRTL binary interaction parameters for ACN/water/EG system
Component j Water EG EG
Dij 0 0 0
Eij 0 0 0
Eji 0 0 0
Fij 0 0 0
Fji 0 0 0
2
Table A3. NRTL binary interaction parameters for IPA/water/DMSO system
Dij 0 0 0
Eij 0 0 0
Eji 0 0 0
Fij 0 0 0
Fji 0 0 0
3
To improve the optimization robustness, Design Spec/Vary option in Aspen Plus is used. The
following tables and figures show the Design Spec/Vary setting and Aspen Plus/MATLAB optimization
framework parameters setting. Besides, the GA optimization progress curves of TAC, capital cost, and
operating cost are also given (the best execution of each case). Note that the TAC is monotonously
decreased, while the operating and capital costs demonstrate a non-monotonous tendency.
Mole purity of n-heptane in EDC 0.999 EDC reflux ratio RR1 [0.01, 1]
distillate
Mole purity of n-heptane in EDC 0.0001 EDC distillate flow rate D1 [48, 52] (kmol/h)
bottoms
Mole purity of isobutanol in SRC 0.999 SRC reflux ratio RR2 [0.1, 1]
distillate
Mole purity of NMP in SRC bottoms 0.9999 SRC distillate flow rate D2 [48, 52] (kmol/h)
Table A5. Aspen Plus/MATLAB optimization framework parameters setting: n-heptane/isobutanol system
NT1 10 40
NF1 10 40
NFS 10 40
NT2 10 30
NF2 10 30
P1 (atm) 0.05 1
P2 (atm) 0.05 1
FS (kmol/h) 50 150
TS (°C) 50 100
4
Fig. A1. The GA optimization progress curve for n-heptane/isobutanol system
Mole purity of water in PCC bottoms 0.9999 PCC reflux ratio RR1 [0.01, 1]
Mole purity of ACN in EDC distillate 0.9999 EDC reflux ratio RR2 [0.01, 1]
Mole recovery of ACN in EDC 1e-5 EDC distillate flow rate D2 [80, 120] (kmol/h)
bottoms
Mole purity of water in SRC distillate 0.9999 SRC reflux ratio RR3 [0.01, 1]
Mole purity of EG in SRC bottoms 0.99999 SRC distillate flow rate D3 [5, 100] (kmol/h)
Table A7. Aspen Plus/MATLAB optimization framework parameters setting: ACN/water system
NT1 10 25
NF1 10 25
NT2 35 70
NFS 35 70
NF2 35 70
NT3 10 30
NF3 10 30
P1 (atm) 0.05 2
5
P2 (atm) 0.05 2
P3 (atm) 0.05 2
D1 (kmol/h) 130 170
FS (kmol/h) 100 160
TS (°C) 50 100
Mole purity of water in PCC bottoms 0.9999 PCC reflux ratio RR1 [0.01, 5]
Mole purity of IPA in EDC distillate 0.9999 EDC reflux ratio RR2 [0.01, 6]
Mole recovery of IPA in EDC 1e-5 EDC distillate flow rate D2 [20, 200] (kmol/h)
bottoms
Mole purity of water in SRC distillate 0.9999 SRC reflux ratio RR3 [0.01, 20]
Mole purity of DMSO in SRC 0.99999 SRC distillate flow rate D3 [5, 100] (kmol/h)
bottoms
Table A9. Aspen Plus/MATLAB optimization framework parameters setting: IPA/water system
RR1 0.01 5
D2 (kmol/h) 20 200
RR2 0.01 6
D3 (kmol/h) 5 100
RR3 0.1 20
6
NF1 20 35
NT2 35 60
NFS 35 60
NF2 35 60
NT3 15 35
NF3 15 35
P1 (atm) 0.6 1
P2 (atm) 0.6 1
P3 (atm) 0.4 1
D1 (kmol/h) 70 77
FS (kmol/h) 50 100
TS (°C) 50 100