Proiect Beton Sem 2

Technical University “Gh.
Asachi” from Iasi

FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND BUILDING SERVICES
C.C.I.A.
PROJECT
REINFORCED CONCRETE
FLOOR DESIGN
PROJECT ADVISOR STUDENT: PALAGHIA IONUT-NICOLAE

MARINELA BARBUTA ANUL:III
GRUPA: 3311
2009-2010
Technical University “Gh. Asachi” from Iasi
C.C.I.A.
1. Preliminary design of the structural elements

1.1. Distance between beams
N=4
Pn=6960N/m2
L=11,6m
l=5,6m
a=2,9m
=l/a=1.932
1.2 Preliminary design of the slab (one way reinforced)

a 2,95∗103
h p= = =82,85790mm
35 35
On choose beb=300mm
bb=200mm
1.3 Clear spans
beb bb
lc1=a- - =2,9-0,300/2-0,200/2= 2,65m
2 2
bb bb
lc2= lc3= a- - =2,9-0,200/2-0,200/2= 2,70m
2 2
C.C.I.A.
1.4 Loads (according to STAS 10101/OA-77 [3] and 10101/1-78 [4])

A. Unfactored value
Permanent load
-from own-weight of slab (hp=90mm)
gnslab=0,9*25000=2250N/m2
-from plaster weight (hplaster=30mm)
gnplaster=0,03*21000=630N/m2
-from mosaic weight (hmosaic=30mm)
gnmosaic= 1000N/m2
Total gn=3880N/m2
Temporary load
-service load given in project data:
pnu=6960N/m2
total load: gn+ pnu=qn=10840N/m2
Permanent load
from own-weight of slab: 2250*1,3=2925N/m2
from plaster weight: 630*1,3=820N/m2
from mosaic weight: 1000*1,3=1300N/m2
Temporary load :
pu=6960*1.3=9048N/m2
Total load:
q=14093N/m2
C.C.I.A.
1.5 Statical Computation
Fig. 1.3
1
M8=M1= q lc12=9339,8Nm
11
−1
MB=MH= q lc12=-7338,4Nm
14
−1
M2=M3= M 3= q lc22=-6421,1Nm
16
−1
MC=MD= q lc22=-6421,1Nm
16
d=hp-cnom-/2=90-20-5/2=67,5mm
cnom=cmin+c=10+10=20mm
M1
= 2 =0.214<lim=0,383 ws1=0.1398
bd f cd
f cd
As1= ws1*b*d* =328.42cm2 117GQ332
f yd
MB
= =0,120<lim=0,383 wsB=0,1398
b2d f cd
f cd
AsB= wsB*b*d* =271,13cm2 116GQ283
f yd
C.C.I.A.
M2
= =0,105<lim=0,383 ws2=0,1225
b2d f cd
f cd
As2= ws2*b*d* =237,57cm2 112GQ246
f yd
2. Beam Design Computation
bb=200mm
hb=(1/101/20)*l
hb=1/10*5,8=0,58...0,29m It is adopted hb=550mm
h>120mm
hb
From the condition =2...3 it results bb=200....250mm
bb
It is adopted bb=200mm
beb b g
lc1=l- - =5,6-0,300/2-0,300/2= 5,30m
2 2
b b
lc2= lc3= l- g - g =5,6-0,300/2-0,300/2= 5,30m
2 2
leff1= lc1+a1+a2=lc1+2min[beb/2, hb/2]=5,3+2*0,15=5,6m
1
M1=M5= q leff12
11
Permanent load
-a=2,90m
(gnslab + gnplaster + gnmosaic )*a=11252N/m2
-self weight
(hb-hp)*bb*b)=2050N/m
Total gn=13302N/m2
Temporary load
-service load given in project data:
pn=pnu*a=20184N/m2
total load: gn+ pnu=qn=33486N/m2
Design load
Permanent load
-a=2,90m
(gnslab + gnplaster + gnmosaic )*a=14630,50 N/m2
-self weight
(hb-hp)*bb*b*1,1=2255N/m
C.C.I.A.
Total g=16885,50N/m2
Temporary load :
p=pu*a=6960*2,90=20184N/m2
Total load:
q=g+p=37069.5 N/m2
1
M1=M5= q l 2=105680.34 Nm
11 eff1
−1
MB= q l 2=-83035.68 Nm
14 eff1
VA=0,45*q*leff1=93413.88 N
left
V B =0,65*q*leff1=134932.98 N
right
V B =VCst=0,55*q*leff2=114174.06 N
Computation of the ultimate limit state in normal section:
fyd=435 N/mm2 S500

fcd=13,33 N/mm2 C20/25
d=hb-cnom-s/2
hb=500 mm
cnom=cmin+ctol=20+10=30 mm
C.C.I.A.
Steel Design:
-First Span:
beff 1 +b b=1425 mm
beff=min {b1 +b2 +b b=2250 mm
It result beff=1425 mm
beff
=7,125>5
bb
bb=200 mm
d=460 mm
beff=1425 mm
hb=500 mm
hp=90 mm
b eff
M max ∗h p hp
= 2 =0,25<lim=1,280 < b d *(1-0,5* ¿=1,28
bb d f cd d
d
M1
= =0,0349 w=0,0356
beff d 2 f cd
C.C.I.A.
f cd
Ast= w*beff*d* =715,09cm2 318 Aa,eff=763 mm2
f yd
Interior Spans:
The width of the flange is:
beff1,2=0,2*1025/2+0,1*0,7*5,8=508,5 < 0,2*0,7*5800=812

beff=2* beff1,2+bb=1217 mm < 2250
beff
=6,085> 5
bb
M2
= =0,028 w=0,0305
beff d 2 f cd
f cd
Ast= w*beff*d* =523,22cm2 316 Aa,eff=603 mm2
f yd
First Support B:
MB
= =0,195 w=0,2190
bb d 2 f cd
f cd
Ast= w*bb*d* =617,40cm2 216+214 Aa,eff=710 mm2
f yd
Interior Supports:
MC
= =0,171 w=0,1938
bb d 2 f cd
f cd
Ast= w*bb*d* =546,36cm2 316 Aa,eff=603 mm2
f yd
Design For Shear:

wmin=0,8*
√ f ck =0.8* √20 =0.00082
f yk 435
fykw=255
fywd=221.7
A sw f cd
( )
s max
=0,5*cw*1*b*
f ywd
=0,5∗1∗0,54∗200∗13.33/435=¿1.65
C.C.I.A.
Where cw=1 for reinforced concrete

f cd
1=0,6*(1- ¿=0.54
200
The maximu distance among stirrups on longitudinal and transversal direction is:
0,75 d (1+ctg)=345 mm
{
Sl,max=
300 mm
St,max=0,75d=0,75*460=345 mm > St,eff=200-2*30= 140 mm
Support B Left:
The design shear force is:
VB,redleft=VBleft-qd=173288,61-45965,15*460=152144,64 N
The capable shear force of the member without specifically shear force reinforcement is
computed with relation:
VRd,c=[CRd,c*1/*(1001*fck)1/3+k1*cp)*b*d
Where cp = 0 axial force is neglected

CRd,c=0.18/c=0,18/1,5=0,12
1=1.0 for ordinary concrete
200 200
k=1+
√
A sl
d
=1+
√
617,4
460
=1.434 <2
1= = =0,00771 < 0.02

b∗d 200∗460
VRd,c=[0,12*1*1,434*(100*0.00771*20)1/3+0]*200*460=39.4045 kN
VRd,cmin=(min+k1*cp)*b*d
Where : min=0,035*k3/2*√ f ck=0.035*1.433/2*√ 20=0.267

VRd, c min=0.267*200*460=24564 N= 24.564 kN
VRd,c=39.404> VRd, c min= 24.564 kN
VB, redleft=173288,61 N> VRd,c=39.404

ctg=2.5
1
1
VRd, max=cw*b*z*1*fcd* =1*200*405*0.54*13.33* 2.5+ 1 =201.05*103 N
ctg+tg
2.5
It can adopt for ctg=1.75
The distance among stirrups for a diameter of 6mm and z=0.9d=0.9*450=405 is given by:
C.C.I.A.
As,w=2*28.3=56.6 mm2
fywk=255 N/mm2 for OB37 and 6mm
f yk
fywd= =255/1.15=221.7 N/mm2
1.15
A sw∗z∗f ywd ∗ctg
s= =(56.67*405*221,7*1.75)/( 173288,61)=51 mm
V ¿Bred ¿
s=50 mm
V ¿∗s
Bred
ctg eff= ¿=1.70
A sw∗z∗f ywd
1
1
VRd, max=cw*b*z*1*fcd* =1*200*405*0.54*13.33* 1.7+ 1 =254.80*103 N
ctg+tg
1.7
¿¿
V
VRd, max> Bred
A sw 56,6
w,eff= = =0,00566 >min
s∗b 50∗200
lb,rdq=1270 mm
lbd=1*2*3*4*5* lb,rdq>lb, min
1=1 for straight bars
2=0.87
3=1.0=4
5=1.0
lbd=1105 mm
lbd, min=381 mm<lbd
\
C.C.I.A.
3.DESIGN OF GIRDERS
3.1 Data Design

-from the rigidity condition
hg=(1/101/15)*L=1,16...0.773m
on adopt hg=773 mm
-bg=300 mm
hg/bg=1.5/3=773/300=2.57
3.2 Loads
Girder weight:
bg*(hg-hp)*b=5220 N/m= gng
gg=5742 N/m
-concentrated loads transmitted by the beams:

Gn=gbn*l=9755*5.80=56579 N
G=66568.5 N
-service loads:
pn=11250*5.8=65250 N
p=14625*5.8=84825 N
3.3 Statical Computation
C.C.I.A.
bh3 400∗4003
Icolumn= =
12 12
beff 1 +b g=2580 mm
beff=min {
b1 +b2 +b b=3050 mm
2∗0.3
L0=5.8- =5.5 m
2
b1=(5.8-0.3)/2=2.75 m
b2=b1
Icolumn=2133333333mm4
3.4 Computation at ultimate limit state in normal section:
beff 1 +b g=2580 mm
beff=min {
b1 +b2 +b b=3050 mm
2∗0.3
L0=5.8- =5.5 m
2
b1=(5.8-0.3)/2=2.75 m
b2=b1
C.C.I.A.
c min ,b =22 mm
{
cmin=max c min, dur =15 mm
10 mm
it results cmin,sl=22mm
c min ,b =10 mm
{
cmin,sw=max c min, dur =15 mm
10 mm
it results cmin,sw=15mm
the effective depth of principal beam is:
d=hg-cnom-s/2
hb=500 mm
cnom=cmin+ctol=20+10=30 mm
d=786-35-22/2=740 mm
the nominal concrete cover is established for both types of steel:

cnom,sl=cmin,sl+ctol=22+10=32 mm
cnom,sw=cmin,sw+ctol=15+10=25 mm
the concrete cover for stirrups is:

c= cnom,sw+10=35 mm
Section data:
bg=300 mm
d=740 mm
beff=2580 mm
hb=500 mm
hp=90 mm
b eff
M max ∗h hp
= 2 =0,064<lim=0.98 < b dg p *(1-0,5* ¿=0.98
b g d f cd d
d
M1
= =0,064 w=0,0673
beff d 2 f cd
f cd
Ast= w*beff*d* =3937,38 mm2 925 Aa,eff=44,19 cm2
f yd
Steel design in support A
C.C.I.A.
The reinforcement in the girder is placed under the longitudinal reinforcement from the
edge beam at a distance of 60 mm from the top fiber.
MAmax=1.989*108 Nmm
M Amax
= =0,0908 w=0,1000
b g d 2 f cd
f cd
Ast= w*bg*d* =680.2 mm2 318 Aa,eff=7,62 cm2
f yd
Steel design in support B
MBred=3.779*108 Nmm
M Bred
= =0,1725 w=0,1938
b g d 2 f cd
f cd
Ast= w*bg*d* =1318.4 mm2 618 Aa,eff=15.24 cm2
f yd
A sl f yd
eff= =0.280
bd f cd
min=0.44+1.25*0.280=0.79
❑max =25 mm
Snh=max {d g +6=36 mm
it results 36mm
Design for shear:

Support B:
VEd,B=2,721*105 N
VEd,Bred=259017 N
The capable shear force of the member without specifically shear reinforcement is
computed:
VRd,c=[CRd,c*1*K*(1001*fck)1/3+k1*cp]*b*d
Where
σ cp =0 axial force is neglected
0 .18 0 . 18
C Rd , c= = =0 .12
γc 1 .5
η1 =1. 0 for ordinary concrete
200 200
k =1+
√ d
=1+
√
740
=1. 519<2
C.C.I.A.
A sl 1524
ρl = = =0 , 0102<0 . 02
b⋅d 200⋅740
The longitudinal steel Asl is anchored with the length lbd in section I-I is considered
6Ø18 (Asl=1524 mm2).
1
[ ]
V Rd , c = 0 .12⋅1⋅1 . 519 ( 100⋅0 .0102⋅20 ) 3 + 0 ⋅200⋅740=110496 . 7 N =110 . 496 kN
The minimum value of capable shear force without specific reinforcement can be
determined with relation:
V Rd , c min =( v min +k 1⋅σ cp )⋅b⋅d
3 3
2 2
Where: v min =0 . 035⋅k ⋅√ f ck =0 . 035⋅1. 51 ⋅√ 20=0 .206
V Rd ,c min=0. 206⋅200⋅740=30488 N =30 , 48 kN
V Rd , c =110.496 KN>V Rdc ,min =30 .488 KN
The capacity of compressed struts VRd, max is determined for the maximum value of
ctgθ=2.5
1 1
V Rd ,max =α cw⋅b⋅z⋅v 1⋅f cd⋅ =1⋅300⋅486⋅0 . 54⋅13 . 33 =361. 9⋅103 N
ctg θ+tgθ 1
2 .5+
2 .5
where z=0.9d
It can observe that VBredleft is between the two values but closer to the inferior limit,
so in this case the shear force is reduced to medium, the minimum quantity of transversal
steel can be obtained for high value of ctgθ.
It can adopt for ctgθ=1.75
The distance among stirrups for a diameter of φ 6mm and z=0.9d=0.9·460=414 is
given by:
A s ,w =2⋅50 .3=100 . 6 mm2 (two legs)
A sw⋅z⋅f ywd⋅ctg θ 100 . 6⋅486⋅435⋅1 .75
s= = =143 .69≈150 mm
V left
Bred
259017
Anchorage of longitudinal reinforcement:
The longitudinal steels on the inferior part of the girder, at the edge support are anchored
to the tensile force:
V a
FE= Ed , A l + N Ed
z
al=0.5*z*(ctg-ctg)=
NEd=0
C.C.I.A.
The effective anchoring width on the edge support is : 300-40=260 mm, that means the width
of support minus the cover layer equa with 40 mm.
The lengths of anchorins for the inferior bars of the girder are:
-lb,rdq =1430 mm
The design anchoring length is:
l bd=α 1⋅α 2⋅α 3⋅α 4⋅α 5⋅l b, rdq >l b ,min
Where coefficients α are :
α1 =1 for straight bars
α 2=1−0 .15⋅( c d −φ ) /φ=1−0. 15 (30−18

18 )=0 . 90
Where cd =min(a/2, c1, c)=min(54,30)
a=200-2·30-2·18=104 mm
α3= α4=1.0
α 5=1 without transversal pressure
lbd=1⋅0 .90⋅1⋅1⋅1⋅1430=1287 mm
lbd,min=max¿ {0.3⋅lbrdq=0.3⋅1430=429mm ¿}{10⋅φ=10⋅18=180mm¿}¿{}⇒lb,min=429mm<lbd ¿

C.C.I.A.
TWO –WAY EDGE SUPPORTED SLABS

2.1. Data and specifications
A concrete floor type two-way edge supported slab is considered as a part of a building.
The sizes of the slab are (9.0m x 22.5 m) with two spans (L) of 4.5 m and five longitudinal spans
(T) of 4.5 m. The floor is realized of concrete C20/25, the steel type PC 52. The finish is realized
of mosaic (30 mm depth) on a layer of cement plaster of 30 mm depth.
The live load is considered: pk = 4000 N/m2.
Fire resistance 60 minutes R60.
Exposure class to environmental conditions XC1
Concrete C20/25.
Steel type PC52.
For concrete C20/25 the design strength in compression:
f ck 20
f cd =α cc =1 =13 . 33
γc 1. 5 N/mm2
Tensile strength is obtained with the relation:

f 1. 5
f ctd =α ct ctk 0 . 05 =1 =1
γc 1. 5 N/mm2
f ctm=2. 2 N/mm2
Steel reinforcement type PC52

345
f yk =345 f yd = =300
 For φ≤28 mm N/mm 2 1. 15 N/mm2
355
f yk =355 N/mm2 f yd = =309
 For φ≤14 mm 1. 15 N/mm2
2.2. Slab computation

C.C.I.A.
2.2.1. Geometrical data of slab

L= 7.3 m
T=7.3
Fig. 2.2.
It must arrange the beams in such way that the ratio:
l1
λ= ≤1. 5
l2
7.3
λ=
7 . 3 = 1.00 < 1.5
In this case the slab is reinforced on two directions.
The depth of the slab must respect the following conditions:
l 7. 3
hf ≥ = =0 . 1825
40 40 m
If the variable action is big, the depth of the slab can be increased, so:
hf = 150 mm
2.2.2. Preliminary sizing of beams
For beams, the minimum depth is:

1 1
hmin = ⋅l= ⋅7 . 3
20 20 = 0.365 m
For establishing the width of beams, it must respect the condition:
h h 0 . 60
=2. . .3 b= =
b , so 2 2 = 0.300 m
One chooses b = 300 mm.
The sizes of the beam are : b=300 mm; h= 600 mm
2.2.3. Span
For establishing the spans the provisions are given in Appendix II.
l eff =l n +a 1 +a2
t h 300 150
a1 , x =a2 , x =a1 , y =a2 , y =min ( ) (
; =min
2 2 2
;
2 )
=75 mm
t=b ;
h=hf
C.C.I.A.
300 300
lny =lnx ,=7300− − =7000 mm
2 2
leff , x=leff , y =7000+75+75=7150 mm
λ=leff , y /leff , x=7150 /7150=1
For λ=1 the resistant reinforcement is on two directions
2.2.5. Loads
Table 2.1.
Characteristic value Design values
Type of loads ni
N/m2 N/m2
A. Dead loads
- slab weight
hp  b  1.0  1.0 = 0.18250  25000  1.0 
1.0 = 1.1 5018.75
2
= 4562.5 N/m
- mosaic weight
(hmosaic = 30 mm) 1000 N/m2 1.3 1300
- plaster weight
(hplaster = 30 mm)
hplaster  plaster  1.0  1.0 =
0.030  21000  1.0  1.0
= 630 N/m2 1.3 820
TOTAL DEAD LOAD gn = 4562.5 + 1000 + 630 g = 5018.75 + 1300 +
= 6192.5 820
= 7138.75
B. Live load
pn = 2520 N/m2 pn = 2520 1.3 p = 3276
TOTAL LOAD qn = gn + pn = 6192.5 + q = g + p = 7138.75 +
2520 = 8712.5 3276 = 10414.75
2.2.6. Statical computation – The computation is made in elastic domain

C.C.I.A.
Determination of moments
Maximum negative edge moments are obtained when both panels adjacent to the particular
edge carry full dead and live load.
For positive moments there will be little, if any rotation at the continuous edges if dead
load alone is acting, because the loads on both adjacent panels tend to produce opposite rotations
which cancel, or nearly so. For this condition, the continuous edge can be regarded as fixed. On
the other hand, the maximum live load moments are obtained when live load is placed only on
the particular panel and not on any of adjacent panels. In this case, some rotation will occur at all
continuous edges.
If we consider a unit strip from the slab (Fig. 2), charged with g + p that can be replaced
with q’ and q”,
q '=g+
p
2 q= +- { {p} over {2} } {¿
Fig. 2
The interior supports can be considered fixed and the external span is fixed at one edge and
simple supported at the external edge.
Under the action of q’, the rotations on the interior supports can be considered equal to
zero.
Under the action of load q”, the rotations are free at all supports; the strip can be
considered as beam simple supported (Fig. 3).
So, for the load q’ the panels can be considered like single panels with corresponding
edges (continuous or discontinuous) (Fig. 4).
Clear spans and static schemes (elastic domain)

C.C.I.A.
Direction 1
Fig.3a
Fig. 4.a.
Fig. 4.b.
C.C.I.A.
Direction 2
Fig. 3.b.
For the load q”, the panels are simple supported at all four edges (Fig. 4.b).
One uses the coefficients method, which makes use of tables of moment coefficients for a variety
of conditions. These coefficients are based on elastic analysis, but also account for inelastic
redistribution.
In consequence, the design moment in either direction is smaller by an appropriate amount than
the elastic maximum moment in that direction.
M x =α i⋅q⋅l 2
eff
M y =β i⋅q⋅l
eff 2
i, βi – tabulated moment coefficients
q – uniform load
leff, – length of span in both directions.
A system of beams supports the slab; some panels, such as (4), have two discontinuous exterior
edges, while the other edges are continuous with their neighbors.
Panel (5) has one edge discontinuous and three continuous edges, the interior panel (6) has all
edges continuous, and so on. At a continuous edge in a slab, moments are negative; also the
magnitude of the positive moments depends on the conditions of continuity at all four edges.
The maximum and minimum moments at midspan on the two directions can be determined as
the sum of the moments given by q’ and q” that act on the single panels, in function of the ratio:
l2
λ=
l
p 3276
q '=g+ =7138. 75+
2 2 = 8776.75 N/m2
q= +- { {p} over {2} } = +- 1638} {¿ N/m2

C.C.I.A.
The coefficients  and  for determining the bending moments Mx, My and on supports are given
in Tables ...
l 7.3
λ= 2 = =1. 0
l1 7 . 3
A. Moments for panels

Panel type (1)
1 = 0.03646
Panel type (4)
4 = 0.02692
Panel type (5)
5 = 0.02268 5 = 0.01977
(A) Positive moments

Panel type (4)
M x =M y =α 4⋅q'⋅l 2+α1⋅q cdot l rSub { size 8{ ital eff } rSup { size 8{2} } } } {¿
eff =
= 0,02692  8776.75  7.15 +0.03646  1638  7.152 = 15131.8 Nm
2
Panel type (5)

M x=α5⋅q'⋅l 2+α 1⋅q cdot l rSub { size 8{ ital eff} rSup { size 8{2} } } } {¿
eff =
= 0,02268  8776.75  7.15  0.03646  1638  7.152 = 13229.38 Nm
2
M y =β5⋅q'⋅l 2±α1⋅q cdot l rSub { size 8{ ital eff } rSup { size 8{2} } } } {¿
eff =
= 0.01977 8776.75  7.15  0.03646  1638  7.152 = 5817.47 Nm 2
(B) Moment on supports

For determining bending moments on supports for continuous slabs supported on perimeter
under uniform loads it can use the following relations (according to STAS ) (Fig. 4a)
1 1
M a =− ⋅β 5⋅q⋅l 2 =− ⋅0. 5⋅10414 . 75⋅7 . 152
10 eff 10 = 26621.40 Nm
1 1
M b =− ⋅β 5⋅q⋅l 2 =− ⋅0 . 5⋅10414 . 75⋅7 .15 2
12 eff 12 = 22184.5 Nm
1 1
M c=− ⋅β 5⋅q⋅l 2 =− ⋅0 .5⋅10414 .75⋅7 . 152
8 eff 8 = 33276.75 Nm
1 1
M d =− ⋅( 1−β 6 )⋅q⋅l 2=− ⋅( 1−0 . 5 )⋅10414 . 75⋅7 . 152
10 eff 10 = 26621.4 Nm
C.C.I.A.
Steel design
The slab is reinforced on both directions, so it must determine the effective depth on
two directions:
d x=h f −c nom −φ s1 x /2
d y =h f −φ s1 x −φ s1 y /2
cmin=max¿{φs=10mm ¿}{15−5=10mm¿}¿{}¿
c nom =c min +Δc tot =10+10=20 mm
d x=150−20−10 /2=125 mm
d y =150−20−10−10/2=115 mm
From the fire resistance conditions, Table 6.6-Kiss the minimum distance to the
centroid of resistant steel is amin=10 mm. For a diameter of 10 mm the effective distance to
the centroid is:
aeff =cnom , eff +φs /2=20+10 /2=25 mm>a min=10 mm
The necessary steel areas are:
 Span of panel 4:
M x =M y =15 .1318 kNm
Mx 15 .1318⋅106
μ x= = =0 . 242⇒ ω x =0 .245
b⋅d 2x⋅f cd 300⋅125 2⋅13 . 33
f 13 . 33
A s , x =ω x⋅b⋅d x⋅ cd =0 . 245⋅300⋅125⋅ =396. 34 mm 2 /m
f yd 309
One chooses constructive steel: 4Ø6 + 4Ø10 / m (As = 412 mm2/m)
My 15 .1318⋅10 6
μy = = =0. 286 ⇒ω y =0 . 291
b⋅d2y⋅f cd 300⋅115 2⋅13 . 33
f 13 .33
A s , y =ω y⋅b⋅d y⋅ cd =0. 291⋅300⋅115⋅ =433. 09 mm 2 / m
f yd 309
One chooses constructive steel: 4Ø12 / m (As = 452 mm2/m)
 Span of panel 5
6
13 . 229⋅10
μ x= =0. 211 ⇒ω x=0 . 226
300⋅1252⋅13 . 33
C.C.I.A.
13 .33
A s , x =0 . 226⋅300⋅125⋅ =365 .6 mm2 /m
309
One chooses constructive steel: 5Ø6 +5Ø8 / m (As = 393 mm2/m)
13 .229⋅106
μy= =0 .250 ⇒ ω y =0 . 272
300⋅115 2⋅13 . 33
13. 33
A s , y =0 . 272⋅300⋅115⋅ =404 . 8 mm 2 /m
309
 On supports
d x=d y=125 mm
Ma 26 .621⋅10 6
μa =μd = = =0 .127 ⇒ ω y =0 . 034
b⋅d 2x⋅f cd 1000⋅1252⋅13 . 33
13 .33
A s , a =0 . 034⋅300⋅125⋅ =183 .34 mm2 /m
309
One chooses: 7Ø6 / m (As = 198 mm2/m)
22 .184⋅106
μb = =0 .106 ⇒ ω y =0 . 044
103⋅1252⋅13. 33
13 . 33
A s , b =0 . 044⋅103⋅125⋅ =237. 2 mm 2 /m
309
6
33. 276⋅10
μc = =0 . 159⇒ ω y =0 .067
103⋅125 2⋅13 . 33
13 .33
A s , c=0 .067⋅103⋅125⋅ =361. 2 mm 2 /m
309
One chooses: 3Ø8 + 3Ø10 / m (As = 386 mm2/m)

Proiect Beton Sem 2

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Proiect Beton Sem 2

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Technical University “Gh.

Asachi” from Iasi

PROJECT ADVISOR STUDENT: PALAGHIA IONUT-NICOLAE

1. Preliminary design of the structural elements

1.2 Preliminary design of the slab (one way reinforced)

1.3 Clear spans

1.4 Loads (according to STAS 10101/OA-77 [3] and 10101/1-78 [4])

1.5 Statical Computation

2. Beam Design Computation

Computation of the ultimate limit state in normal section:

fyd=435 N/mm2 S500

beff1,2=0,2*1025/2+0,1*0,7*5,8=508,5 < 0,2*0,7*5800=812

Design For Shear:

Where cw=1 for reinforced concrete

St,max=0,75d=0,75*460=345 mm > St,eff=200-2*30= 140 mm

Where cp = 0 axial force is neglected

1= = =0,00771 < 0.02

Where : min=0,035*k3/2*√ f ck=0.035*1.433/2*√ 20=0.267

VB, redleft=173288,61 N> VRd,c=39.404

fywk=255 N/mm2 for OB37 and 6mm

3.1 Data Design

-concentrated loads transmitted by the beams:

3.4 Computation at ultimate limit state in normal section:

the effective depth of principal beam is:

the nominal concrete cover is established for both types of steel:

the concrete cover for stirrups is:

Design for shear:

α 2=1−0 .15⋅( c d −φ ) /φ=1−0. 15 (30−18

lbd,min=max¿ {0.3⋅lbrdq=0.3⋅1430=429mm ¿}{10⋅φ=10⋅18=180mm¿}¿{}⇒lb,min=429mm<lbd ¿

TWO –WAY EDGE SUPPORTED SLABS

Tensile strength is obtained with the relation:

Steel reinforcement type PC52

2.2. Slab computation

2.2.1. Geometrical data of slab

2.2.2. Preliminary sizing of beams

For beams, the minimum depth is:

2.2.6. Statical computation – The computation is made in elastic domain

Clear spans and static schemes (elastic domain)

q= +- { {p} over {2} } = +- 1638} {¿ N/m2

A. Moments for panels

(A) Positive moments

Panel type (5)

(B) Moment on supports

One chooses constructive steel: 4Ø12 / m (As = 452 mm2/m)

One chooses constructive steel: 5Ø6 +5Ø8 / m (As = 393 mm2/m)

One chooses constructive steel: 3Ø6 + 3Ø12 / m (As = 424 mm2/m)

One chooses: 7Ø6 / m (As = 198 mm2/m)

One chooses: 3Ø8 + 3Ø10 / m (As = 386 mm2/m)

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen

beff1,2=0,21025/2+0,10,75,8=508,5 < 0,20,7*5800=812

St,max=0,75d=0,75460=345 mm > St,eff=200-230= 140 mm

Where : min=0,035k3/2√ f ck=0.0351.433/2√ 20=0.267