Sie sind auf Seite 1von 3

FAR EASTERN UNIVERSITY

Institute of Accounts, Business and Finance


Internal Auditing Department
Internal Audit
1st Semester AY 2019 – 2020

Grading Sheet
Internal Audit Report Presentation

Group:
Process:

Please use the NUMERIC SCALE of the appropriate box of your choice relative to the VALUES
given below:

SCALE INTERPRETATION BASIS


Covered all requirements of the section with some
5 Outstanding
discussions of each part. Presented the report excellently.
Covered almost all requirements of the section with some
4 Exceeds Expectations
discussions of each part. Presented the report good.
Covered almost all requirements of the section, lacking
3 Meets Expectations some parts and with minimum discussion. Presented the
report well.
2 Does not meet any minimum requirements.
Below Expectations
1 Unacceptable results.

A. PAPER CONTENT and ORGANIZATION – 70%


STRUCTURE COMPONENT WEIGHT SCORE
PLANNING 25%
Background of the Process
Assess the significance of the reasons in conducting 5%
internal audit of the chosen process
Risk and Control Matrix
Evaluate the assessments of identified high risks,
5%
adequacy of key controls, and chosen controls to be
tested. May refer to Annex
Audit Objectives
Evaluate whether objectives are aligned with the results 5%
of Risk and Control Matrix
Engagement Scope and Resource Allocation
Assess the coverage of areas, time frame, and budgeted
5%
versus actual hours that are appropriate and sufficient to
achieve the engagement objectives
Audit Program
Review the audit procedures for identifying, analyzing,
5%
evaluating, and documenting information in achieving the
engagement objectives
FAR EASTERN UNIVERSITY
Institute of Accounts, Business and Finance
Internal Auditing Department
Internal Audit
1st Semester AY 2019 – 2020

PERFORMING 15%
Identifying Information
Evaluate the sufficiency, reliability, relevance and 5%
usefulness of identified information. May refer to Annex
Analyzing and Evaluating Information
Review the sufficiency and appropriateness of analyzed
5%
and evaluated information in supporting conclusions and
engagement results. May refer to Annex
Documenting Information
Assess identified, analyzed and evaluated information, or
5%
overall working papers, if properly and formally
documented. May refer to Annex
COMMUNICATING and MONITORING 20%
Conclusions
Evaluate whether conclusions are supported by overall
10%
identifying, analyzing, evaluating and documenting
information.
Recommendations
Assess whether the condition and/or cause of the findings
and exemptions will be mitigated and adding value to the
organization. 10%
Action Plans
Review the feasibility of the action plans and its timeline,
if applicable.
TOTAL 60%

B. PRESENTATION QUALITY – 20%


GROUP GRADE
FACTORS CRITERIA WEIGHT SCORE
SLIDE / Clarity; accuracy; design/color; logical 5%
TECHNOLOGY organization; effects; graphics & charts
DELIVERY Logical; persuasiveness; articulate; voice 5%
projection; demeanor
QUESTION Accuracy and quality of answers; group 5%
AND ANSWER coordination
TOTAL 15%
INDIVIDUAL GRADE
Overall Presentation and
Student Number Name of Student
Communication Skills 5%
FAR EASTERN UNIVERSITY
Institute of Accounts, Business and Finance
Internal Auditing Department
Internal Audit
1st Semester AY 2019 – 2020

C. INDIVIDUAL GRADE (by CAE) – 20%


Student Contribution Initiative and TOTAL
Name of Student
Number 10% Participation 10% 20%

SUMMARY OF GRADES
Paper Individual
Presentation Total
Student Content and Grade
Name of Student Quality 100%
Number Organization (by CAE)
20%
60% 20%

Signature over printed name with date

Comments/Suggestions:

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen