Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
PLEA AG REEM EN T
andtheDefendant,W ojciechJ.Chodan,pursuanttoRule11(c)(1)(A)ofthe
FederalRulesofCrim inalProcedure,state thatthey have entered into an
waiving any rightto have the factsthatthe law m akesessentialto theplm ishm ent
Page 1 of 19
Case 4:09-cr-00098 Document 23 Filed in TXSD on 12/06/10 Page 2 of 19
eitherchargedintheIndictmentorproven toajuryorprovenbeyondareasonable
doubt.
States Departm entofJustice and the Defendant;itdoes notbind any U nited States
Punishm entRange
3. The stam tory m axim um penalty fora violation ofTitle 18,United States
Code,Section 371,isim prisonm entfora term ofnotm ore than five yearsand a
orlossto thevictimts),whicheverisgreater.Additionally,theDefendantmay
receive a term ofsupervised release afterim prisonm entofup to three years. Title
18,United StatesCode,Sections3559($(4)and3583(b)(2).TheDefendant
acknow ledges and understandsthatshould he violate conditionsofsupervised
already served on the term ofsupervised release priorto such violation. Title 18,
UnitedStatesCode,Sections3559($(4)and3583(e)(3).TheDefendant
understandsthathe cannothave the im position orexecution ofthe sentence
Page 2 of 19
Case 4:09-cr-00098 Document 23 Filed in TXSD on 12/06/10 Page 3 of 19
4.PursuanttoTitle 18,UnitedStatesCode,Section3013(a)(2)(A),
im m ediately after sentencing,the Defendantw illpay to the Clerk ofthe United
Restitution,Forfeiture,and Fines
Page 3 of19
Case 4:09-cr-00098 Document 23 Filed in TXSD on 12/06/10 Page 4 of 19
disclosure.
United Statesw illseek the transferto the U nited Statesofthe D efendant's assets
facilitate the transferofthe assetsin the aforem entioned accountsto theU nited
States and the forfeiture ofthe assets therein,and to testify truthfully in any related
constitutespropertysubjecttoforfeiturepursuanttoTitle18,United StatesCode,
Section 981(a)(1)(C).TheDefendantknowinglyandvoluntadly agreestowaive
any claim ordefense he m ay have underthe Eighth A m endm entto the United
forfeited assets.
Page4 of19
Case 4:09-cr-00098 Document 23 Filed in TXSD on 12/06/10 Page 5 of 19
C ooperation
determ ined solely by the United States through the Fraud Section ofthe Crim inal
cooperation,inthesolejudgmentanddiscretionoftheUnitedStates,amountto
çtsubstantialassistance,''the U nited Statesreservesthe sole rightto file a m otion
Page 5 of 19
Case 4:09-cr-00098 Document 23 Filed in TXSD on 12/06/10 Page 6 of 19
(a) Defendantagreestotestifytruthfullyasawitnessbeforeagrandjury
orinanyotherjudicialoradministrativeproceedingwhencalled
upon to do so by the U nited States,including in a proceeding in a
foreignjurisdiction.DefendantfurtheragreestowaivehisFifth
A m endm entprivilege againstself-incrim ination forthe purpose of
this agreem ent;
(c) Defendantagreestoprovidetruthful,completeandaccurate
inform ation and testim ony and understandsthatany false statem ents
m adeby theD efendantto the Grand Jury,atany courtproceeding
(criminalorcivil),ortoagovenzmentagentorattorneycanandwill
beprosecutedundertheappropriateperjury,falsestatementor
obstruction statutes;and
(d) DefendantagreestoprovidetotheUnitedStatesalldocumentsinhis
possession orunderhiscontrolrelating to allareasofinquiry and
investigation.
(e) Shouldtherecommendeddeparture,ifany,notmeettheDefendant's
expectations,the Defendantunderstandshe rem ainsbound by the
term softhisagreem entand cannot,forthatreason alone,w ithdraw
hisplea.
Page 6 of 19
Case 4:09-cr-00098 Document 23 Filed in TXSD on 12/06/10 Page 7 of 19
W aiver ofAppeal
to appealthe sentence im posed orthe m anner in w hich itwas determ ined,and the
post-conviction proceeding.
notyetbeen determ ined by the Court. The Defendantis also aw are thatany
Booker,543U.S.220(2005).Accordingly,theDefendantunderstandsthat,
although the Courtm ustconsultthe United States Sentencing G uideline:and m ust
Page 7 of19
Case 4:09-cr-00098 Document 23 Filed in TXSD on 12/06/10 Page 8 of 19
take them into accountw hen sentencing the Defendant,the C ourtis notbound to
agreem entarem ade in exchange forthe concessionsm ade by the United States in
acceptsthisplea agreem ent,the U nited Statesw illm ove to dism issthe rem aining
Page 8 of 19
Case 4:09-cr-00098 Document 23 Filed in TXSD on 12/06/10 Page 9 of 19
(b) tosetforthordisputesentencingfactorsorfactsmaterialto
sentencing;
(d) tofileapleadingrelatingtotheseissues,inaccordancewithU.S.S.G.
Section6A1.2andTitle 18,UnitedStatesCode,Section 3553(a)'
,and
which are only advisory,asw ellastheprovisions ofTitle 18,U nited States Code,
Section 35534$.TheUnitedStatesandtheDefendantagreethattheapplicable
Sentencing Guidelinesrange exceedsthe statutory m axim um sentence offive
thathe w illnotm ove fora downw ard departure on any groundsand that,asofthe
tim e ofthis agreem ent,no such groundsare applicable,norw illhe seek a variance
Page 9 of 19
Case 4:09-cr-00098 Document 23 Filed in TXSD on 12/06/10 Page 10 of 19
StatesCode,Section3553(0.TheDefendantacknowledgesandagreesthatthe
Courthas authority to im pose any sentence up to and including the statutory
sentencetobeimposediswithinthesolediscretionofthesentencingjudgeafter
the Coul'thasconsulted the applicable sentencing guidelines. The partiesagree
Code,Section3553(*.TheDefendantunderstandsandagreesthattheparties'
positionsregarding the application ofthe Sentencing G uidelines do notbind the
Courtand thatthe sentence im posed isw ithin the discretion ofthe sentencing
judge.lftheCourtshouldimposeanysentenceuptothemaximum establishedby
statute,the D efendantcannot,forthatreason alone,w ithdraw hisguilty plea,and
Rightsat Trial
Page 10 of 19
Case 4:09-cr-00098 Document 23 Filed in TXSD on 12/06/10 Page 11 of 19
following:
(a) lftheDefendantpersistedinapleaofnotguiltytothecharges,the
Defendantwouldhavetherighttoaspeedyjurytrialwiththe
assistanceofcounsel.Thetrialmaybeconductedbyajudgesitting
withoutajuryiftheDefendant,theUnitedStates,andthecourtal1
agree.
(c) Atatrial,theDefendantcouldrelyonaprivilegeagainstself-
incrim ination and decline to testify,and no inference ofguiltcould be
drawn from such refusalto testify. How ever,ifthe D efendantdesired
to do so,he could testify on hisown behalf.
18.TheDefendantispleadingguiltybecausehej.
:guiltyofthecharges
contained in Count1 ofthe lndictm ent. Ifthiscase were to proceed to trial,the
United Statesw ould prove each elem entofthe offense beyond a reasonable doubt.
The follow ing facts,am ong others,w ould be offered to establish theD efendant's
-jt.
1
Page 11of 19
Case 4:09-cr-00098 Document 23 Filed in TXSD on 12/06/10 Page 12 of 19
Page 12 of 19
Case 4:09-cr-00098 Document 23 Filed in TXSD on 12/06/10 Page 13 of 19
Star'')byTSKJ,expectingthatTeslerand Tri-starwouldpaybribes
to high-levelNigerian governm entoftk ialsto assistTSKJ, K BR,and
othersin w inning the EPC contracts to build the Bolm y Island
Project.In 1996,1999,and2001,CHODAN alsorecommendedand
agreed to the hiring ofa globaltrading com pany headquartered in
Tokyo,Japan(çf onsultingCompanyB'')byTSKJ,expectingthat
Consulting Com pany B would pay bribesto low erlevelN igerian
governm entofficialsto assistTSK J,K BR,and others in w inning the
EPC contractstobuildtheBonnylslandProject.
e. AtcrucialjuncturesinthelifeoftheBomly IslandProject,
CH ODA N ,Stanley,and othersm etw ith successiveholdersofa top-
leveloffice in the executivebranch ofthe Govem m entofN igeria to
confirm thatTSK J should use Tesleras itsagentand to learn or
confirm who the office holderhad designated asa representative w ith
whom TSK J and Teslershould negotiate bribesto N igerian
govem m entofficials. O n oraboutN ovem ber30,1994,Stanley and
othersm etw ith the firstsuch top-levelexecutive branch officialin
Abuja,Nigeria,whohaddesignatedahigh-levelofficialofthe
M inistry ofPetroleum ashisrepresentative. Thereafter,Stanley and
othersauthorized TSKJ to enterinto a consulting agreem entwith Tri-
Starproviding forTSKJtopay it$60 million iftheEPC contractfor
Trains 1 and 2 w asaw arded to TSKJ. CH O DAN understood that
Teslerhad negotiatedthe$60m illion feewith the high-levelofficial
oftheM inistryofPetroleum andthatthe $60 million feewould be
used,in part,to pay bribesto N igerian govem m entofficials.
Page 13 of 19
Case 4:09-cr-00098 Document 23 Filed in TXSD on 12/06/10 Page 14 of 19
Page 14 of 19
Case 4:09-cr-00098 Document 23 Filed in TXSD on 12/06/10 Page 15 of 19
evidence orisotherwise notcom pletely trtlthfulw ith the U nited States,then the
United Statesm ay m ove the Courtto setaside the guilty plea and reinstate
prosecution. Any inform ation and docum entsthathave been disclosed by the
agreem entshallbe determ ined solely by the U nited Statesthrough the Fraud
whosejudgmentinthatregardisfinal.
C om plete Agreem ent
Page 15 of19
Case 4:09-cr-00098 Document 23 Filed in TXSD on 12/06/10 Page 16 of 19
threatshave been m ade againsthim and thathe is pleading guilty freely and
22. Any m odification ofthisplea agreem entm ustbe in w riting and signed
by allparties.
FiledatHouston,Texas,onl 4,2010.
f
/v ')
r w
gyj ay . e t>
WtjciechJ.Chodan
Defendant
subscubedandswomtobeoremeon( ,2a10.
D AV ID J.BRAD LEY
UN ITED STA TES D ISTRICT CLERK
By: O
D u United States DistrictClerk
APPROV ED :
Page 16 of19
Case 4:09-cr-00098 Document 23 Filed in TXSD on 12/06/10 Page 17 of 19
ï X
Patrick F.Stokes
Deputy Chief
M aryland State Bar
) ,x.,-z ..
.
.
-
-. ..
?k
x..a
. yp
A ndrew Lourie
AttorneyforDefendantW ojciechJ.Chodan
Page 17 of 19
Case 4:09-cr-00098 Document 23 Filed in TXSD on 12/06/10 Page 18 of 19
:14-. /2sl o/
AttorneyfortheDefeâdant ate
Page 18 of 19
Case 4:09-cr-00098 Document 23 Filed in TXSD on 12/06/10 Page 19 of 19
1have consulted w ith m y attorney and fully understand allm y rights with
1''
I/ (/ lo
1
D endant D ate
Page 19 of 19