Sie sind auf Seite 1von 1

CIVIL

CIVIL
LAWLAW
Answers
Answers
to thetoBAR
the BAR
as Arranged
as Arranged
by Topics
by Topics
(Year(Year
1990-2006)
1990-2006)
Trust;
then
constitutes
Salvador
not
concerned,
condoned
In
1)
for
The 1971,
damages
depend
matter Implied
executed
How Ableconsigned
by may
solely
an
much,
should
against Resulting
Construction,
his an
undue
annul
father
affidavit
on ifbethe
the
any,
the
such
interference
as
decided
jewelry
P
will evidenced
may
Inc.
ofassignment
100,000.00
ofdesistance
entered
the
shop
Joey
in debtor
favor
withbe
which
byintofor
in
compelled
awhich
the
of
but
notation
not
court,
put
a Remigio
contract
right
also
having
up
led
has
promissory
any
property
condition
Even
The
Bernie
1.
and
the
on
at
of
to
Juana
been
payment
action
[if]50% has
assuming
of
extinguished
ofwill
note
ZY,
of
Eva
the
at the
not
hisall.
passing
right
astotal
prosper.
wife
that
aPrintado
result
ofby payments
may
there
action
the the The
ofalso
1998
haswas
novation
theto existence
also
sue
recover
made.
a
foreclosure
Bar perfect
to
aExaminations.
or
standing
recover
extinction
(a)
ofright
(Rillo inflation
her
ofv.it
the
of
one-
of
Court
Trust
because
withdrawal
to
action
other
their
back
with
[2%]
defense
In enter
1960,
Roland
filed
given
the
pay?
(trustee) an (1995)
Tropical
consent
2)
offactors
for
his
To into
the
ofrescission
Maureenwhat
check
offorce
Home
outside
thereto.
contracts
the
actionextent,
payment
information
Developers,
majeure.
purchasedof
the
has the
and
ifdebtor’s
atnot
for
deed
the
all,
two against
the
Will
prescribed.
can
Inc.
impairment
of P300,000.00
lots the
conditional
Jojo
whereby
Lolita
in abeaction
plushThe
andof share
with
Article
refusal,
deflation
mortgage.
principal
Hence,
My
the
chattel
first
or
half
of
contract
under
Appeals, publisher
in
upon
answer 2016the
compensation
requires
obligation
Eva's
G.R. proceeds
ofinsofar
will No.Publico
the125347,
passing
not an Civil
asthe
be official
of
for
third
Bar,
the Code
the
did
the
parties
the
same
June declaration
sale
if
printing
rightsnot
are she with take
concerned.
asof the and
to legal
of the
other by
damages.10,000
place
buyer the
terminated and Eva acquired ownership
case
her freedom
his
sale,
control.
reading:
the
compelled
prosper former
subdivision
ALTERNATIVE release
at
plus or"In
bar not?
by
damages.
would
to
fullfrom
involves
Joey
play
registering
ANSWER: (5%)
payment
build
to jail.
and contribute
Will
an
for
Lot enjoy
Theofthe
express
the
1 the inparents
basketball.
latter
action
herto
loan". such
trust
the
name prosper?
failed
Willhouses
which
and thisto interestvolumes
family
because
Bangko
Marvin needed
19,1997) Sentral
thereof,
willthe
of be school
claim thengand
liable textbooks.
money
is
Pilipinas.
(b)
unliquidated.
for such forofsupport.
damages the property.
Suplico
damages for was as sheof
breach
The
does
comply
Explain.
be
within
payment?
SUGGESTED
Lot assignment
a2 validnot
in itsthewith
subdivision.
prescribe
[3%]
defense
ANSWER:
name theiris valid
ofin as
her because
promissory
The
an long action
cost
brother asofWalter there
they
for
note
each is
collection?
have
house,
and
with not the may Extinguishment;
contract
aware beofable
ALTERNATIVE of option.
said proveWith
toprinting
ANSWER
ANSWER: (2): ascontract. the payment
having After
been printing suffered of the
No,
(d)
The The
absolute
Can the
action
Rolandobligation
action
freedom will bewill prosper.
isby
to
bound not
valid.
transfer prosper.
Since
byThe the
thedeath theThe
credit of
defendant
contract action
the
and son
theafor by
he A.
The (2).
Period; unlawful
Extinguishment;
Payment
In 1983 Mrs. ZY
Suspensive
(1995)
PHILCREDIT detainer
cannot file
action
Compensation
extended aactual
suit
will to prosper.
loans recover
vs. to Itwhat
ais
Rivett- a
CONTRACTS
SUGGESTED
been
finance
(3%)
labor
latter's andrepudiated ANSWER:
company
materials
consent. The included,
sued
idea the was them
trustee
was
to P100,000.00.
for
circumvent (Diaz specific vs. (c)
SECOND
1,000 The
consideration
her, third
ALTERNATIVE
volumes,
which defense
for
may the
Printado ANSWER:
includeof
option Yalsois untenable.
given,
fails or and
to performY is
with the
It
1. depends.
Joey
rescission
of
was cancer
creditor
entered
SUGGESTED already
performance.
Four
subdivision
Gorricho. hundredcanneedinto be
within
ANSWER:
103 If
may
in
policy compelled
notthe
default
units one
with get
Willagainst
Phil, notation
bewere year
thenot
Lady
the action
261). to
brought
is
tothe pay
having
consent "in
made
Love
beacquisition full
onlyonly
constructed
prosper oror payment
delivered
a
of the
negative
the can by the
hetheof
of not? compensatory The
her
given
Period
In a
Payment
Define
Strom
surety
consent sale
husband
deed fact
of
under its printing to
(1991)
of ofin
the another
the
sale
(1998)
compensation
Machineries,
X and lost.theproblem,
parties
damagesof Art
a person
2014
realty,
Inc.
extrajudicial
contract and that
as
the
aswith it before
of there
was
object
well Publico. athe
demand Eva
was
Civil
stipulated
(RIVETTT-STROM), mode
of
as moralSuplico could
contract
and Code of
The
the
remaining
Implied
moreloan"
aggrieved
suspensive
ring
debtor.
disregard
(3%)
within action
when HeTrust
five
than was
the willsame?
balance
delivery
party
condition
only
years.
one lot prosper.
writtento
needs
In byofwas
1973,P200.000,
the
to
oneto
Isby hisheThe
Arturo's
demanded
contract.
notifymaking
Able
buyer. liablepromissory
in
him.
found view
Maureenfather,
Since
the
at by all?
that of itit
plaintiff note
the
there
How buy
was exemplary
provides
inflation,
that
beingthe it
extinguishing
consisting
against
(San
sues from which
that
buyer
present,
the
Miguel,
Printado of Manuel
damages a
principal
forany
caused
would
anUS$10
perfected
Inc.
the loser
dueis Million
thevalid,
construct
obligation,
debtor
value v. toin exchange
aand
contract
is
Huang,
of
the as
game
not
the abreach
for the
commercial of
rate
distinguish
of theoption
inconsistent
unpaid G.R.contract
chance
ofcost towas
trust No. it
of
Extinguishment;
executed
was
remission an impliedof by Lolita's Cause parentsof is valid and
(1998)
Salvador
payment.
at
Juan due
SUGGESTED
about
could
constructed and date,
Sweet
no The
hiswho aJojo's
ANSWER:
longer thesister
Taste?
housecondonation
obligation share
defendant
failed
continue IsJuana
onit Lot by
is
to
liable
with the
isof
demandable
inherited
1 tocreditor.
comply
the
with the
liable Lady
job
an balance
for from
Love?
due if(Art.
with
the
extension the that
totheir
loss his and between
may
double.
building
from
SUGGESTED
created.
deliveries recover
apayment.
machineries
with
137290, bad Manuel
Since
on
judicial the
ANSWER:
July
faithunder thehis
lot
[2%]
imported
demand
31,
(Imperial and
theircontract
loss
while
2000) Eva
order from
the
and
against
vs. is
Undera the
itself
sellermere authorizes
directly
the
agreement.
CA, would promise
winner,
surety.
Article
259 SCRA paid
At1170 A the
with
the tobyof
Roland
Action
TX filed (2004)
isnot bound by the contract he entered
binding,
discharges
1219,
conditional
son
of
mother
the
on the
Lotdoes
increase
Consensual 2atwo
Civil
thing tosuit the
Code)
the
servein for
obligation,
andparcels
die the vs.
ejectment
even
asconsideration
obligation.
withinprice of
aRealwhenhe
guestone farmland
of is
oilagainst
In
year
the not
house.and
Contracts;
such
loss(Article
the
its BD
being
with
Inwas 1987,for
case, duethe
aggrieved
exactly
1185, the
to COMPENSATION
sell
legal
increase
(d)
65).
same and
The
construct
PHTLCREDIT,
suretyship
the interest
Civil
Of time Eva
inamay
fourth
Code,
course, has
rentalfrom
private
Publico defense
and is
not
ifco-exist
those the 5 athe
insues
the mode
acquired
passageway
who
buyertime
of
Million event
withYinis
Printado of
hein
the
knew of extinguishing
amortgage.
paid
auntenable.real
an
bordering
cash right
inflation
the
performance
for
of the payable
damages amount
co-Y theover
is ortoin
of
2.
into Jojo
non-payment
notation
party
NCC).
force
the with
extinguishment
same canis
majeure.
who be
Lady
areas.
may an compelled
of Love
condominium
of
act
fileFor Lolita's
the ofand byhe
the
convenience,
action Joey
civil cannot
rentals
father
for torescission
liability contribute
from
the disregard
and which
Torrens not
but the
lost. concurrent
devaluation
liable
lot. Theland
This
installments
their for assuming
means
the
building
obligation of amount,
the
entire
over wasthat
Philippine that
only
prestation
a lot
are the
eventually
period guilty obligations
hethere
peso,
of ten can
since
offinished is
the
file
(10)Y their aof
doubling
the
incurred
contravention those
price
butown
years suit. on
derivatives
Walter who and
had the
suffered concomitant serious worldwide
business ownership
for breach over
of contract
the with
he was respect buying, to Juana
Kinds
Conditional
Non-Payment
P50.000
amounting
the
spiraling
losses
same,
ALTERNATIVE
stifling
condonation
certificates Star of
Art.
ofunder
demanded of Real
ofObligations;
1217.
ANSWER:
to
pricesthe
may the
P150,000. of
Contracts
that
par.
criminal
Semiconductor
title be of
all
3,
principles
inferred.
covering Civil Amortizations;
During
prosecution.
commodities,
Maureen
Code
ofthe
The
both(1998)
Company.
remove
provides.
obligatoriness
pendency
condonation
lots thewere
including The can persons
stipulated
X.
Mrs.
of
a
the the
solidary
thereof,
printing ZY
seller
basis
seek who
monthly inin
cannot
as inthis
the
obligation
failed
of
agreement.
(c) the their
rent
to
reconvenyance contract
recover
value is own
with
complete
case,
In reasonable
as
thereof
the right
for
when
suitathe
the
of are
spousecontract
computed
her
filed and
passageway
Marvin reciprocally
one-half
by iswho did
Suplico,to
at has be
the
not
The
Promise
Subdivision
In
"When
of
beingtwo
contracts.
the
company,
placed action
separate
one
case,
implied,
in (1997)
of
Juan's BD
however, will
Buyer;
the documents
Obligations
it
name not
solidary
offered needis When and
alone.
not prosper
debtors
arising
not TX justified
signed
opting Incomply from
accepted
1996, because
tobyrescind
cannot, (2005)
him,
contracts
with
Juan the Juanthe
the
sold debtors
considered
interest
therefore and
in a thea creditors
valid sale
absolute
act and of
under each
there
community
the other
was
very (Tolentino,
delivery
terms
property of oror
basic
extension raw materials
house since requiredthe lot for
on the
which the as
(Arts.
rate
give
share some
Printado of1207,
Carlos
instead of
exchange the
1216.
counters the but squatters,
1252 of
agreed
she
that: theand
must(a) who
2047
U.S.
period Suplico
implead were
Civil
dollar of ten already
Code;
vis-à-vis
cannot
the days,Bicol
buyer the
are
consideration
Bernie
Valentino
SUGGESTED
because
have
full amount
formalities
contract
to an the bought
of
innocent"obligated"
butANSWER:
force his
due
of for
aof
has ason the
insolvency,
law rentals
donation
purchaser
chosen promissory
installment
himself
between reimburse
from
to
to each
one the
be BD,
waive note
atowho
parties.
effective.
parcel Maria
his was
residential
share
then
Salvador's in the
The
its SUGGESTED
Savings
1991
tradition
ALTERNATIVE
conjugal
the and
ed.,
contract. of ANSWER:
Loan
p.
the
ANSWER:
partnership 365,
Brian's Associates
thing citing
sold.
refusal
of vs.
gains, 2to Guinhawa
Castan
pay because is thus 188
560 SCRA
under
a and
construction ofconsensual
the houses. his The cost of known
Philippine
liable to be
for payment
damages. there
pesoisat at the
theallege time time of they
payment. entered
Distinguish
extension
Yes,
ALTERNATIVE
subdivision
and
to
filedthe toRoland
non-prosecution
a Perla,
debtor
motion
was is
ANSWER:
lot
thus
built
liable
paying
to of
from- 'To
dismiss
was
the under
the criminal
DEVLAND.
Maria, from
property.
the
obligation,
the mywhich
ejectment truereal
contract
case After
such
In 1992,
for
love,suit asIon
estafa.
having
share far as demand
(b)
642) co-defendant
No,
Extinguishment;
My answer
RIVETT-STROM she will and
not
made
for
not be deliveries
entitled
theto753).
payments
his
same bad
made
toon faith
Itif the
under
Carlos
involves
both
in paid
rentals the
defense
compliance
entirety
development
Maureen of
without
sued fullwithhadpayment
for the
the
risen
the knowledge
towill,
condition
reconveyance therefore,
unanticipated and consent
to itbe
her canvalid.
levels of of Francia
do purchasing
Art.
ground
into
their 117(7}
the
Liability; order vs.
for
contract,IAC.
ejectment.
ofentire
agreement
the
Solidary
162
the
refused SCRA
Family
lot.
until
Obligation; Finally, Code,
vacate
Suplico lossesloans
the
consistent
Mutual has are
The
contracts
as
This
When,
1.
faithfully
obligate
shall
the action
Lady cannot
What
be
ground Love
however,
borne for
and
rights
paid
myself that be rescission
is
the
by to
the name
ofallconcerned.
done
the action,
installments
give his
action you at will
anymore
notation least
ifmy
co-debtors,
is any,not
Hewas
one
already for prosper.
four
doesis
because
48
and
in liable
written (4) the
Juana
months,
only The
for
the collected
Loss
by simultaneous
Dino
Marvin
which (1994)
suedif byBen
P10,000.00
based Manuelfor prior
balancing
on damages
the because
becauserate of of because
an
two atoption
exchange the
obligationstime
the contract
in they
latter
1983 in
under
Juana,
and Art.
2toassertingand
such 1545, wrongfully
a degree NCC. a that kept
the of for
conditions himself and borne
premises.
with
completed the exclusively
In
ruling fact,
performance by
to its the
execution, loser-spouse. the
Lot
buyer
damages
information
Arturo
kinds
SUGGESTED
have
Bernie
horse
proportion has
himself.
of
against not
under
real Ihas
ANSWER:
discovered
when topaid.and/or
feel
the
that
committed
It Article
already
merely
contracts
like
debt thatthe
resulting
of1170
It." - any
been
proves
buyer?
DEVLAND
and
each." under
trust
breach,
filed the
his
|3%]
-'To in
had
was
Civil
intention
the
Perla, let
courtfailedmyalone
Code and in
to orderGuaranty
A,B,C,D,
accrued
had
was failed
perfected. and
and (2003)
to Ein
were
deliver made Imperial
Thus, collected,
the under
themselves us. CA.
antique
ifthe Marvin Evasaid Juana
Marcedes contract;
solidarity
was
withdrew mayyet
not the
extinguished.
entire
factors price
which Is
formed BD’s contention
the original correct?
basis ofdoes Why
the
ADDITIONAL
would
Therefore,
seller tohave
filed extinguish
ANSWER:
fully
these
ejectment settled them
cannot cases to be the
loans.
against extent
charged the in which
against
created
BD's
a
to substantial
since
Sincedo
making
2.
develop
true Since
SUGGESTED
or why
present
he
itthe when
contention
is
sweetheart,that
not?thethe
ANSWER:
law.
she
orisIThat
contravened
illegal.
insolventpayment
two
subdivision
Reason. [3%]
had
notdebtor's
serious
lots
obligate
the
correct.
the
have
(5%) but lot
inone, theinregistered
the TX
consideration
share
accordance
myself no to
same can
tenor
to warrant
way still
which
payarea, in
of
withfor
you the
Joeyhis
theit seek (b)
indebted
FIRST
the
1.
Benz
offer
the
absolute
Suplico
instead
ALTERNATIVE
owner
Juana car
prior
amount
squatters.
toof
can
Dino should
X (d)
to
of for
the
file
community
The had a
the
one
buyer
thedeclaration
pay
ANSWER:
anproperty.
action
purchased damages
amount
expiration
is
now covered for of
property
sues
that
damages
fromthe
forshe
P50,000.00.
of
byor
breach
Ben,
the
that
seller
isagainst
now
which
10-day
of
conjugal
for
of
the
contract
Walter's
maintain
rescission/resolution
obligation.
Yes,
paid
promissory the had
name
the
Able
wasfather been
suit
Not
P100,000,
note even for totally
being
Construction.
isyou if she
ejectment.
sought achanged.
paid by the
The
contracting
Inc. is the Able
purchase
entitledvendor. party,
to On Assuming
the
contract;
When sole X owner
andthat
demanded (c) ofEva with
the is
payment the
entire
Publico one
remaining
should
from entitled
A, be
the lot to
liable
on
latter buy
bind
suppose
approved
the his
P500.00 Juana plans I owe flies
(Yam and athe and
complaint
v. CA,stifling
specifications
when there
G.RI feel ofare
to
No. likethe
have104726.only
within
it." criminal
herself two
11
the Juan
was—by
period,
PHILCREDIT
other. for
partnership (Dehaving
agreement—due
he contends
Leon,
ofbreach fraudulently
breached
gains. 1992 that
This the for
ed.,the
beingsolddelivery
option one
payments
p. so, 221, of
Mrs. on the
contract.
on
citing
ZY two 8
brought
price. Waltersuit against
opposed -Tropical Homes praying specific
the
for house
Printado’s
theory performance
and
that lot,
Juan she
has with
of his damages.
isdelivery
forfeited not
contract entitled
his The
with
one-half to Bhas the
acceptance
Sweet
the
remaining
declared
February
time
Months
SUGGESTED contrary,
relief
prosecution frameTaste sought
sole
passed1999) by
in
ANSWER:is
debtors itthe
thenot
.but
owner is
under
evident
In lessor
the
bound
such
plan.
Juanofthe the
He of
vendor
Article
namelyfrom suit
by
case,
never the
entire
thus thearguing
the payment
who
1267,
theJoey contract
wrote
bothered Civil
execution
and
notation
remaining that
appears
a letter
to by but
Code.
Jojo was to
by it-
to PAYMENT
refused
Conditional
parcels
December
(Article
both
SUGGESTED
Manresa
no
defense loans
interest
to
which
1324, means
pay
31,
should
ANSWER:
401).
is that in law he on
1993.
Civilthe
not
the
partly
Code)
be
to
only
following
Ben,
based held
prosecute
obligation in in
his
on grounds.
trust
the
toare answer
and
of
rate
construct
formoney
recover to
of a)
Juana's
the
but
is
as
that
assuming
the
have
This
can
The
these the
lessee
is
be
law a Court
failed
case
held
finance
two the
of
provides: the
of
liable
shall relieve
existence
to an
companyrentals
comply
implied
under
"When
share itthatof
of
in
Art.
theits
aarrears
with obligation.
resulting
resulting
1314.
service the even
The trust
trust.
has Iswhich
during
condition
basis Able
theof
If of sharerentals
Publico
also
only
No,
Obligations
Pedro the collected
therein.
because
performance
16 years
contentions
promised old.
(2000) the
tobyof
b) of Manuel
order
an
Cthe
give hasobligation
Printadohis before
agreement
already
grandson she
(Article
been
untenable. apassed
between 1232,
car if
not
second
DEVLAND
make
CONSENSUAL the
good lot, act
contending
informing
his of
promises.
CONTRACTS hisit equally
thatof
father
Maria her the
he and
arethe
brotherwas affidavit
from burden
Perla
those had
stopping
came benefit.
c)
Dino's
exchange
she Supposing
has
passageway
Juana
complaint,
no existing
legal may
should
that
said
at
standingclaim
be Dino's
with
actual
Carlos
time
in acourt ofor
claim
period
accepted has
payment,
to do
which, noso. the
Construction
action
the
imposed
Walter
its
become pendency
liability
desistance
reimbursement. of
claims
soMaureen
by isthe entitled
of
to
not
difficult
immediately the
have
Jojo has
contract
prescribed
as to
ejectment
may the
already
acquired
to the
be
after
thus relief
by case
fulfillment
manifestly
the
be sought?
prescribed
ownership
contract does
execution
compelled of
beyond since
not
which
of
but by
byis the
Suplico
Civil
condoned
Printado
the bar
Code).
latter
compensatory
offer
SUGGESTED before examinations.
and by
having
will Printado
In
ANSWER: X passpayment,
c)failed
damage
Marvin D is
the wasto Whether
bar
for
could for
capacity
insolvent.
pay the the
for
examinations.
loss it
benefit
d)
the
communicate is
to
E
of a
printing
her contract
dispose
was of given
When
share his of
condonation
forfeited
payment.
to consult his you may
share
Consequently,
on whether be
thereof byinferred. or There
wrongfully
DEVLAND
not they being
cancelled which
could no basis for
rate the ofhadsuit,
exchange because hasfixed asbeen thebycar was being
consistently
which
ten years
constitute
would
ALTERNATIVE
the
founded
Joey
Lolita'sland are
have
contemplation
condonation
disposing to by
on have
a
contribute
parents
of
perfected
waiver
rendered
ANSWER: already
prescription
quasi-delict,
at
her allof ofor
the
undivided the
P50.000.00.
the by
elapsed
abandonment
the or
defense if mere
obligation
assuming
parties,
promissory
sharehe from
anchors
of the
in
consent
full ofthe
to
that
the the
obligor
note. pay
his
payment
first Sweet the
The
lot.
incidentally,
of
Publico.
No.
the
by
paper
his
in X
the sale
the
thing
an
grandson
withdrawal
driven land;
to Are
actionormoral
paid
extension
covered be the athereof?
for
and
by
passed
delivered
not
contract
contentions
specific
of
the
damages
been
capacity
6 months
delivery
to the Dino
toofon
performance
to
said
for
Discuss sell,
Printado
receive
without
invoices
the
them,
examinations,
mental
January thereciprocal
filed
payment
on time,
1, by
legal
the
recover saleon and thewrote basiswritten Bernie,
of the foregoing informingsettings. him that increasing, hence, consent the and for
need
of the for which
fixing
other
reason
four aimposed
judicial
co-debtors.
there period. would
StateWill
If
(Art.theWas
registration
Liability;
ejectment
balance
defense notation
1315. on of case.ofCivil
the
extinctive was
the Code).
title
Solidary
purchase inofhis
prescription, byREAL
name.
price Arturo's Decide.
demandable.
the father,
ten year prestations
in it consequences.
tenable?
the
are
Suplico
Pedro buyer
SUGGESTED required
has Explain
is are
premature
ANSWER:
the right deemed
your
for toanswers
under
debtor
cease ason
Art.
making andto
1197 Afurther
each for
of the
creditor, the
Taste
a)
SUGGESTED
may
will
Will
his
What not also
consideration
the
payments
Extinguishment;
knew
wouldbe
suitbe the of
ANSWER:
valid.
prosper?
your arethe
released
being (Spouses
action contract.
forfeited
legal therefrom,
illegal,
[2%]
advice Clutario
in Article
DEVLAND
the its
be? inv.
promissory
favor. 1314CA,
whole proper?216
of
or the
note anguish,
1994,
still
the be
actionarefused
a anxiety,
reckless
considerable
for
to
specific
(2%)
truckgive
moral the
shock
driver
balance
performance
carhad and
on rammed
eachof
the
wounded
the
ground
loan. into Isis
Contract
I
1. would
amounted
When,
Discuss
Extinguishment;
Obligation
In June advise
fully.
1988,for to of Maria
an
convenience,
(1992) X Option;
express
obtained not to bother
condonation
the
a loan Torrensrunning
from of
title
A afterthe
andto A contract
seller effect
contention.
Civil Code.
respectively: to of to
deliver
If each
(5%)
a in construct
period of
the
compensation,thehas the
above
object not house
sold
been defenses
such of
and
fixed Carlos
capacity put
for the is
CONTRACTS
Further,
SCRA
period
Civil
Explain.
part."
is invalid
Compensation
Stockton
341
Code must far [1992]).
(2%)
is
and
a
from
be
provides arereckoned
may
(2002)
stockholder
those
being not unable
that from
any
be
of
which 1987
third
enforced
Core
toare
Corp.
comply
when
person by he
He
with delivery.
who
court thatcontention
feelings
SUGGESTED
the
buyer
theshe
Mercedes
against
And condition
had
ANSWER: the
Benz.
theof latter
suffered; was
The
PHILCREDIT
seller
didtrial
prosper?
not
aexemplary
purely
court violate
correct? the
potestative
damage
dismissed Discuss
Elements
Marvin
Juan
balance
ALTERNATIVE
the
Novation
In 1978,
executed
SUGGESTED
what
demanded
induces for
two offered
the
which
parcels
Bobby
is incumbent (2005)
latter
ANSWER:
(1994)
with
ANSWER:
another that to
must ofconstruct
to
borrowed
Y
to upon
Maureen make
comply
land
as
violate were the
goodwith
Pl,000,000.00
solidary
it, his
remove ie.,of house
payhis
placed the
the
contract co-maker
the of
promise.
formalities
in
extension Carlos
from Joan's
balance
shall a
be order perfected.
up
As
not by
regards
although
SUGGESTED
one. A
to onpay
necessary,
Isagreement
he Contracts
his
thethe
contemplated
ANSWER: obligation
correct(Integrated price.
loan because
orfor are
consisting
not? by to
Before(2%) perfected
thepay
the the X,
Packaging of
parties, if such
happening by
dollars,
compensation the mere the of
action.
perfected
It isaa assumed by the that delivery
Lady Love theknew object of the by
Dino's
fully.way of example
complaint, saying the Ben'scommon obligation good,had and
desires
forthe
No,
[This
of
name
Chito the
promissory
of is to
veryaction
because
donation
alone,
payable
price sell his
reasonable
there
note
the inof a to
two
buyershares
DEVLAND
inpromise
was be
years.
favorhas inoffered
price
valid
created Core
is
ofis
The notA of
notan Corp.
underan
loan,
for P900,000.00,
proper.
toimplied
the
pay In
actionable
the
which view
sum
it Under2nd
trust
was
even of consent
of No,
defenses
the
parties
operates
SUGGESTEDhe is
condition,
contention not
manifested
are
themselves
by
ANSWER: correct.
ofv.found
law the
PHILCREDIT by
to
fruits
should
and First
be the
not true.
of
isfixof
meeting
the all,the
correct.
by that the
thing of condition
Itact
period, the
hasand oftooffer
thebe
the
house
liable onfor Lot damagesNo. 2 becauseto the suchother demand contracting Corporation
attorney's
indeed, been fees. Court
Juana
extinguished ofhas Appeals,
noby cause
force (333 of SCRA
majeure.action Is
of
a the
contract.
court
Section
giving
wrong
paragraph
(a resulting
evidenced
P200,000.00.
without
obligation.
suit
the
that 23
the
Neither
by that
allows
of of
latter
trust)
a
vendorArticle
The
Roland
Core for
promissory (Art.
Presidential
a 10partyCorp.
the days
1270
loan
having
nor1316,
to has
benefit Sweet
note, of
was
compliedfiled
Decree
within
recover Civil
the
wasof Taste
against
New
Juana No.
which Code)
especially
secured
payable with
would 957,to
Civil
withthe at
SECOND
a)
is No.
not
SUGGESTED
and
interests
Suplico
paid
failing
parties. the
in
ALTERNATIVE
Article
purely
cannot
in ANSWERS:
acceptance
on
Philippine
Inwhich, 1262,
potestative,
the
be
payment, held
the
ANSWER:
moneyNew upon
liable
currency
Courtthe Civil
arebecause
for
maybe theCode
deemed
damages,
computed
performance thing
askedprovides,
it does
and
forto
toon
must not
have
fix the it
be
amounts
party.
be liable, to an express
because repudiation
the restriction of the trust
in was the cause
170,
against
Under
the
(a) A G.R.
trial
may the
Art. No.
court buyer
1164,
avail 115117,
correct?
the who
there
minorityJune
acquired
is no 8,
of [2000]).
the
obligation
B as land
a defense, for
on the
Examples
him
otherwise
accept
when
Code.
Juan
by ait
P20,000.00
suspensive
and forasshe damages
or
Since
mortgage
was has
trustee of
known
reject
made the
with real
not
conditionon inthe
amount
of real
known contracts
the
suffered
one-half
interest amount
asattached
offer.
to the
of
property. the On
damages
undivided
monthly
Maureen. are
of
Subdivision
the
balance
toNo Pthe deposit,
10 fifth
resulting
action
within
The million,
oris
payment day,
more
ideal
action and
the basis "An
depend
breach
been
taking
complete;
value
obligation
of
of
and
on
which
contract,
mutually
into the which
theexchange
are
consideration
while
inANSWER:
good
sole
in as to consists
itwill
compensated was
compensation
faith,
ofnotone
constitute
rate
the
relying
inatthe
he
probable of
who the
under
on the theredelivery
the parties.
contract.
violated
TIME Article
may of
the
OFbe
contract
plus
Condominiumattorney’s isANSWER:violativefees
Buyer's of of Article
Pacceptance
1 million,
Protection 1306 asDecree, as
aforeclose
result beingnon-of part
but
a of
only
Extinguishment;
determinate
Secondly,
order
Manuel
for
agreement, B’s
even
to
share
thing ifthe
deliver
it of
shall
were, Pbe the
10,000.00.
Compensation/Set- fruits
extinguished
itBefore would Atransfer
(rentals)
be it of
ifvalid
before
from
than
pledge,
portion
filed
first
of the
SUGGESTED
for such
5,000
by
week Carlos
of
Chito
price,
reconveyance promise.
ofpesos,
commodatum
each to
thus could
each ofthe
collect
waiving
filed A make
month promise
theinthe and
two
such
1992 up
loan
beginninghis
does
simple
lots.
or mind,
condition
is not tonot
by yet July Marvin
create
Arturo
Therefore,loan
as1988
barred well of (Gomez
ALTERNATIVE
1187.
PAYMENT
contemplation
partial
certificate
the thing
v.
of each
extinguishment
showing
until ofbut
Court
the
Printado.
of
installment,
that parties.Juan
obligation
Suplico
Appeals,
of is as
the an
to held cannotG.R.
the
registered
deliver inperiod
obligation be
KalaloNo.
the
contrary to law morals, good customs, public solidary
It has
Under
Off; been
Banks debtor
Article held
(1998) may
1315 in avail himself of any
for of the Civil Code, Carlos
payment
statements
a) What ofis amortizations
published
the effect by of by
Stockton
thethe buyer which
withdrawal is against
justified
are of 120747,X, who
SUGGESTED
should
because has
be itlostadepends
ANSWER: savings
or Borromeo
destroyed deposit
on the vs.
with
without sole CA Ythe (47
Bank
will SCRA
fault
of in the
of
withdrew
an
the
Juana
until obligation
(mutuum).
by condonation
can
mortgage.
maturity
as prescription.
the 60-day his file offer.
on an
But the
in
term must
(Spousesaction
in part
April 1991,
in also
its offor
1989. Juan
favor
Huang be
Bobby, in
damages because
v.writing
To
The without
secure
Court stipulation it
of isthe
under held
is liable
fixed,
(Tolentino,
v. Luz,
owner
thing
2. Juana's 34
of an
arises.
for
September
the
Printado’s
action
supra)
SCRA
suit land.
As to 337.
the
have
breach
21,
As
specific
suspensive
herself
2000)
regards of contract
performance
declared the
condition P5 with
as isthe
Million
sole has
order
if
Marvin's
not
Article or
non-payment
allegedlysomething public
748.defamatory
offer? policy.
which
There is
(2%) due because
arises
being to fromthe
no it was
a failure calculated
contract,
acceptance of thein defense
and
69
sum
the ),
Publico.
creditor that
Marvin
of
debtor, Hewhich
the
(the is are
P1,000,000.00
and
not personally
Supreme
donee) bound
before
a party and Court
to
incurs
he
to belongs
the
nothas allowed
fulfill of a what
incurred
agreement theloanto athe
has
debtor solidary
obligation
in
entered been
delay.
(the
Joan
receiving
payment
that
Appeals,
Nature for
the of having
any
of Contracts;
P100,000.00
Sept. the fraudulently
amount
13,loan. 1994). fromX Privity
down put sold
Chito, up of
payment one
executed of
as security the two
shall bea loan premature.
not inofPhilippine
been fulfilled, pesos,
the PHILCREDIT
obligation to isnot
sell wrong.
does
SUGGESTED
subdivision
to injure and ANSWER:
owner
damage to develop the subdivision owner
co-debtor,
Conditional
simultaneous
expressly
with
intoThe by the and the
saidbut
betweenentire
only
filing
stipulated
Bank remaining
as
of
ofPrintado to
inactionand
the the sum
and to
all area
share fixof thewill
of
consequences
Publico. that
probable
P800.000.00
Theirs co- isby
law,
writing
parcels
another
chattel
returned quasi-contracts
by
which Arturo,
promissory
mortgage
by thehe the
partly
on
vendor orthe
note his corporation’s
quasidelicts
condonation
held
which
car,
to in
the a trust
was Toyota
vendee(Art,
isfor
worded void Juana's
Corolla
if and
the b)
donor).
The judgment
payment thereof the trial
cannot court be is incorrect.
measured
Contract
The
Baldomero
project
(Eugenio
reputationwithdrawal (1996)
according
v. leased
andDrilon, of
goodwill. Marvin's
his
to
G.R. house
the No.
The offer
approved with
109404,
articles will a telephone
cause
plans
January
of the
and
22, not
prosper
debtor.
which
not
Loss arise.
Obligations
contemplated
Are
thereof.the
a because
following
hasUnder
stipulation
of the (2003)
period
become
thing pour while
obligations
Article
due of
atrui.
by Juan's
the
1167,
due. [Aforesaid]
fortuitous act
parties
valid,
When if in
Marvin selling
where
why,X
Such
events and
tries the
none
would
or ifbeto
1157)].
the
benefit.
exactly
sedan.
squattersobligation Under
as
Because Juana
the
are Art.
to
1978 pay
notofremoved 1182,
may
failure the
promissory Juan's
balance
claim
ofwithinXHence, promise
note,
andsix subsists.
actual
except
Y months,
tothat to
payJose Theor
for
the is the peso-dollar
Extinguishment; exchange
Assignment rate. That
ofby Xthe will
offer
to
Lolita
1996)
withinJose. to
was
the The cease
limit lease
employed for in
contract
complying. law.
in a provided
finance even if (b)
other
is
they
refuse
withdrawA are
fixed
contracts may
lot in
towas
do avail
the
valid,his
could of
wrongful.
agreement
when
construct deposit,
not the is condonation
affect It
the
the did
if
Y thisnot
obligation
third house,
Bank have
would
persons allows avoid
Carlos
like of legal
C’sonly is
incorporation
Maria
defense
compensatory
the date iscovenant
void
of
thereof,full ofdamage
because Core
paymentwhich Corp.
athe for
wasis, provide
conditionaltherefore,
the theloss date for
obligation
of of acar
not
her itsright
valid.
share of force majeure isUniform
aplanters
valid defense for a debtor
principal
also
subsequently
shall
As
b)
first
apay
regards
Discuss
company. refusal
amount
for in allfavor
Perla,
the
Because
for
accepted,
rights
ofthe
electricity,
the of document
she
the of benefit
thereloan,
water
Bernie
could
corporation. isof
and the
could
an the
under
not
vendee,
telephone
express bethe wasno violative
Rights
The
share
effect sugar
multiplicity
demandable
entitled
Suplico
P200.000.00
only when
of of10,
(2001)
P
to
because
the000.00.
cane
forfeiting
ofinsuits.
have
the to each
of
debtorthe
thehis
be In A
share Currency
addition,
case?
construction
basic
withdrawn,
has
ofinBatangas
solidarya) If
civil
not the
law
Act
debtor
remaining
technicalities
the
incurred be debtor
principle
less
(RA,
done
entered
may,
delay. of
529]
by in
service a
depends
In
in case
the
execution.
extrajudicially
which the the upon
land; 1)notation the
moral
Canforeclosed.
latter sole
Chito was
has will
damages not
demand A of the
written
acquired
validly for obligor.
payment by
the
waivedthe Arturo's
mental
on
car byat which
into a prohibits
long-term the payment
milling contract of an obligation
with the
concurrence
services
Extinguishment;
acknowledgment
circumstances. in of the the of
(2%) offer
leased
Extraordinary
a debt, andpremises
and thethe acceptance.
during
Inflation
promise the
to actions
In ALTERNATIVE
lot.
means However, filed
to pay; by
ANSWER:Juana
b)the If creditor,
can
the file
debtor anavail action
promises himself against to ofpay all
OBLIGATIONS
After
Accordingly,
account
father,
anguish, several
the for Stockton
answer
anxiety, the fruitless
funds gave
isoffered
moral the letters
written
entrusted
same
shock asand of
notice
the to demand to
her,
answers
wounded the must
promises
relativity
third
charges, be
person
Extinguishment subordinated
of to pay
contracts
at
claiming as
the
of soon
which to
expense
that
liability substantial
as forhe
provides of has
compensation
fortuitous that
Marvin. the justice.
contracts
Marvin
event has
the
A's 1991
implicationhighest promissory
when bid of
ither note
P120,000.00inmonths1994?
to pay 2) during
the Can balance the in which,
Central
The
defenses action although
Azucarera
for
which specific to
de Donbe Pedro
performance paid Inc.in will Philippine
Ten not years
the
period
or
pay
Juana
against
corporation
above.
absence
Deflation
SUGGESTED
On July
what has of
1,Xhe no the
ANSWER:
1998,
and
ofowes
causeof
(2001)
his lease.
Brian
Y, concurrence
offer A when
of Six
leased
action
sued
to sell he an feels
against
Y
his of
office
alone
shares later.
offer
like
the space
for it
ofbuyeris
P Jose
and
the10 Juan
when
can
in for
only
that
extinguished
requires hecase partition
likes;
bind
that the
will
its
the c)are or
If
parties
be derived
termination
the
obligation
debtor debtor
who
liable has
from
entered
forunder
not of
promises
damages
yet
the the
intothenature
co-
it,
incurred to and pay
under
savings of
it
feelings
Chito
she
auction
Under
of thewas she
foreclose charged
sale.
P.D.
purchase No.had the suffered;
957,
price real
with a estate
upon estafaexemplary
cancellation
the mortgage and
execution damage
option if of isa currency,
later,
prosper.
the the
obligation
Inexistent The is
Central measured
filing
and
Contracts assigned
of
of the
those by
vs. a
its
ejectment
which foreign
rights
Annullable are to
suit currency.
the
by
personal said
the
acceptance,
surreptitiously
a
who building
equivalent
recovery
million. acquired
The for
to
of there
responsea
athe vacated
promise can
period
P80.000.00land of be of
to
for
Coreno
the five
pay consent.
premises.
value years
when
constituting
corp. and
was (Laudico
at
hisin an He
a
means
good left
rental
the Liability;
ownership
when
cannot
Article
account
any he
delay.favor
1170.
to with
becomesor
the
In Lease;
the a
prejudice prayer
concurrent a
present a Joint
that
third amount
case, the
person,
the lot of sold
even
X's
debtor beif
debt.
washe X
by
Bobby way
available
deed of
fails to example
to make
Bernie. for
good
If the
Bernie his common
obligation
opts to to good,
cancel under and
the (Palancamilling v.
contract CA, 238 to SCRA
to a Taiwanese593). group which
ordered
Aleatory
v.
behind
rate Arias
permits
faith,
SUGGESTED
deficiency.
acceptance ofof absolute
him
relying arrested.
unpaid
Rodriguez,
P1,000.00 toon
ANSWER:
Y
of do sale
Contracts;
telephone
theaso,
resisted
the offer In
month. by
G.R.
and
transferin
the
order
theis
the No.
The vendor.
bills
deemed to
certificate
suit
exercise secure
16530,
for
contract (Art.
raising overseas
ofbeof 1545,
March
of itsher
lease
one
title
the
seller
himwas
ANOTHER
to
Contracts
Distinguish
lawyer;
Liability
adjudicated
Four
is aware
contends
in delay
or d)
foreign
of
when
precisely
ANSWER:
pertain
If(2004)
(2001)
such
that the
to brieflydebtor
Juan,
medical
contract
compensation
the car
in
his
and compliance
was
own
but
promises
and the
students
hasshare.
clearly
remaining
destroyed isacted towith
With
improper pay
rented
with
on
his
between
lotif his
be
Januarywhenthe
attorney's
the
contract,
NCC)
Gambling
1)
A. Yes,1991
Mr. Chito
ZY fees.
promissory
DEVLAND
(2004)
lost can P100,000
demand mustnote? inreimburse
payment
a"in card game
on Bernie
the called
1991 the 2. The suit
would
obligations
respect
Inexistent take
tothe will
and
thoseover
contracts prosper,
should theand
which applying
operations
not,
personally therefore,
annullable the of
belong ruling
the
be
contracts. to in
sugar
31,
telephone
release
contained
with
showing
following
rights an
sued 1922)
of from
that calls
the
indefinite
together
defenses:
first Without
Juan
refusal,amounting
jail,
proviso period
withher
is a) the consent,
that
Y.
offering parents
under
That to
registered
Y over
for case
Art. there
should
the P20,000.00.
executed
1180. of
owner
purpose not is
inflation
Hence no v.
of
be son,
knowledge
one
1, CA,
1993 who
adjudicated
apartment ofsupra.) isthereof.
since sick
ofand Thelma
debts,
it with
reconveyed
was cancer,
(Integrated
due for
as fora
here, does
to
period
Packaging
delivery her. not
arises of on diefrom
one year.a
total
promissory amount note paid
in 1994. and Although the amortizations
the 1978 Imperial
mill.
faulted
c) The
It depends
others, if vs.
no
he semester,
may CA
planters
decision cited
whether
avail filed above.
has an
or not yet Both
action
been
Ben lawto
reached
thereturned and
annul
seller, asby the
Russian
aperfected
Baldomero
or
ANOTHER
b)
the
liable
payment devaluation
amount
land.
promissory atThat poker,
allin contract
ANSWER: refused
isthe
because
form but
recoverable
note of hefor
to
ofobligation
Xthe
to had
pay
was
compensationthepay no
the
after
not more
construction
Philippine has
the said
Perla or cash
bills
been
finance peso,
asks
set-off to
on
ofthe pay
paidthe SUGGESTED
within
the Corporation
After
contract
December one
one ANSWER:
year.
of
31, 5% himself
deposit.
1993. three
(Art. ofthereof
Assuming
1262 them Civilthe
only
Code)thatas theto
interest,
1. Under
promissory
in fulltoofthe excluding
Article
note
winner 476
for delinquency
P1 of
atacquisition
millionthe
the Civil
timepayable interest,
Code,
the two Juana
session plus equity
INEXISTENT
Rescission
said
the
was
regards Court
SUGGESTEDalreadyauthorize
assignment
that on CONTRACTS
of
the
in
ANSWER:part such
Contracts;
defaultmatter.
of on
the a at result,
the
debt are
the ground
time
for said
considered
which of thethat
the not
the
house
ground
monthly
completely
court
against that
set
the Carlos.
rental the Jose
by
amount will(Salonga
had
A's
period already
automatically
as
ofquieting
damages provided v. Farrales,
substitutedbe
of
by
itv.isDrilon, increased
the
Art.
claiming G.R.
1197,him
car their
promissory home country
note signed and byand, fourth
X is totherefore, transferred
evidence the
company the amount allegedly Supreme
(c)
Y
(a)bankA may
aThe is Court.
not
correct.
obligation interpose An. is 1287, the
valid. defense
Civil
It Code,
an of doesvoid
obligation not
TRUST
interest
can
years
ended.
No.
as
or file
Conditional
the later
L-47088,
decreased
through
par. 2. anatHe
customer legal
action
or
"dacion promised rate.
Obligations;
in for
1980
July
depending of10,
en (Eugenio
became
the to1981)
pago" pay
ontelephoneof
Resolutory
theaPX,
or title
natural
Article theas
devaluation
payment there
winner,
company.
1318 G.R.byis
of having
Proper
In December
Taiwanese
or accident
latter
to are been
Party
boarding group
because entered
1985,
responsible. (1996)
house. awasSalvador
demand into
not
(Article
Thelma and
registered
for 1222, him the
discovered toStar
NCC). with
deliver the
that
against him, exclusive of the claim for loan
Strictly does
speaking,
(Note: not
The provide
Juana's
question for
contention
presupposes compensation
that
knowledge her
misappropriated
a
In
No.cloud
Condition
1997,
109404,
obligation
two
c)
the
The
inflation
cession.
attorney’s
weeks
Civil
latter in
That of the
Manuel (1999)
after
Code title
January
thereafter.
Y
maintained
fees. the bound
the
should
provides
peso
Stockton
by
tolapse the
22,nottheir
thathimself
toBut subject
1996)
of
be
that ten
hedaughter.
held
Baldomero
the
rejected
to
there(10)real
sell
failed liable
dollar."
the
property.
Eva
years,
can toStarting
remained
offer
The
do
for
bea the
offorno insolvency
so apply.
subject
ob
Board
on
they
between
initio.
Semiconductor
due All
of
leftand
to
date the
They ofan
unpaid
said
D
Investments.
was do
loan
requires
as
requisitesnot a defense.
indefinite
Company not create
complied
telephone
and his
the
of(SSC)
Will Art.
periodany
the
savings
Applying
1279,
executed
with
bills
application
action byCivil
because
obligation
in
deposit,
the
him.
the a Code
prosper
of total
the
and
who
the
c) Supposing
SUGGESTED
Second,
house and ANSWERS:
Juana
lot DEVLAND
which can is also
being hadfile
rented fully
an by developed
action another brother
principle
are
debtor
cannot
Deed
or not?present.
of hadof
binds
beConditional
Explain forfeited
mutual
Inhimself
ratified the
briefly. or case
Salehis
guarantyto share
of
pay
validated,
(5%) wherein among
Gullas in as
when the
the second
solidary
his
there
vs. formerPNBmeansis no
[62
finance
such
despite
deficiency
contract
as
March
the his
Stockton
natural
1,
corporation, company
the
customer
unless
2001,
is
of obligation
lapseP80,000.00
correct.
the
theas of
arguing far two
following
lessor
There
can
as months,be
because
their
increased
thatis to no
a valid
requisites
service
compensation
right
so
he thePXwas filed
contract
of settled
not
concur:
rental in a
to That
amount
is fact
correct?
Express
lot is incorrect.
not
of
provisions[3%]
Trust;
having
P80,000.00.
Evenof the been Omnibus
iforthe
given
The
two lots
in
lease
Investment the
have contract
the Code,
the
Marvin
SUGGESTED
damages
person, subdivision
consideration
court a will
if
suit
ANSWER:
Eva not
againstto passes
of be
collect
a but
Juan,
novated liable
the the Bernie
because
1998 promissory
amount pay
bar failed Carlos
the
of note to any
P50,000 pay Phil. debtors,
permit
agreement
agreed
problem, 519),him
to A guaranteed
sell
the the
to do
his
trial Supreme
ratify so
2,000
court the
(Articlesquare
erred payment
Court
validate. 1180,
in held:
meter On
dismissing of
NCC). the
lotD’s
"The When
inotherCivil
co-mortgagor
(1)
was
P2,000
The consent
concerned,
telephone athe month,of in the the
company onthe chattel
parties;
notwithstanding
the isthe (2)
groundmortgage
correct object of of
certain
the inflation lease the provided
SUGGESTED which that
ANSWER:properlythe not lessees
belongs shall
to Commercial pay forlaw) the
between
compensation
further
damages
rule
examinations.
dated
that
car
which
contract
proven is
whichheinby
is thatinstallments
1991
won
the
for
contract
between
the
value
the
subject
between
withdrawing
butproper
Luckily
and
fact
of
payable
remained
was
Baldomero
that for
matter
his shares
after price
recourse
Eva,
executed
the two
exchange
4
offer
she
of unpaid.
and
the
and
ofyears
years by ofbecause
P10
passed
the
before
contract;
Jose. the
Xlater,
million
Will
ratealone
due
Who true
said
ofor the
the
and
as
asis
the
Prescription
to same
On
share
Code
the
hand,
Cainta,
The
Dino's
01
telephone
area,
January
and
creditorcomplaint.ofitknows
contains
ANNULLABLE
action Rizal, all
will
to
services
(1997)
does1980,
the
the other
that
prosper
Reason:or
latter
in
follow
Redentor the
the There
that
co-debtors.
provisions
VOIDABLE
for
notdebtor
the and
leasedonpricetheyRemedies
the
default
have
Hence,
already
is CONTRACTS regarding
of ground
premises. hasA
far
amount
and
business
lapse
(a) as
Core of
Suppose it
of is
damages
Corp.’s
the reverses. concerned,
period
Manuel demanded
unliquidated Discuss
granted.
had sold the the by
claim
In only
the the
this
samefor person
rights
case, house and
no it the
entered
cannot same
compensation
the
are means
valid
P1,000,000.00,
invoked into
avail value.
until toan
of
butresponsible the Since
agreement
(set
pay,
invalidated
onpayable defense
thethat off)
he the
groundmustandsale
by by
of
P100,000.00 D’s
the of
virtue
deposit.
file the first
of
insolvency.
an
court
that student the which
action
down,but lot
These
farmers may
and in
owner
examinations.
d)
in
owner
(3) That
collection
1993.
cause
correct,
Philippine of
and the
assuming
Allofsuitthe property
mortgagor.
Baldomero
peso the against that
elements
obligation.
to the Ywho
ZY
orBaldomero.
the
dollar was
isofliable,
prosper?
an
telephone
had prejudiced
he
implied should
increasedCould real Mrs.
company? and
from making Thelma him
demanded for
the fortuitous
fourth events pay
Consideration;
contracted
SUGGESTED
corporation
damages.
obligations
consideration
and
SUGGESTED lot
fraudulently
only
novation
ZY file pay to
intheare
In with
ANSWER:
cannot
another
ANSWER:
turn
order
of was was
the
dispossessed
proportionate
present:
atosuit
legally
that
beforeparties.
given
a)
against Eva
an
take
compensation by
ofold
sum (2%)
passed
PX theof
The
effect.
Carlos
valid
to same telephone
Is
may
the
P40,000.00.
recover for 1998 be
is thethe
to (d)
on
the
If on
portions
court
be
the
have The
the
former
SUGGESTED
including theto
ratified.
balance extension
Torrens
notother
fix was
of
In the
60
ANSWER:
theamount
title
to
hand of
Philippine
period,
inexistent
given days
assumption
in six
register
Ben the
after
their (6)was
and name
a months
contracts,
the
of risk
parcel
law not
when
consent of
squatters in
or loss.
given
Juan
of
the
one land
default
provide was by
definite
or
to
in inas
more
the X
that
the
Explain.
P25.00=$1.00
In
A. this
company
Stockton case,
1.examinations,
The has
correct?
suit pursuant
noby P50.00=$1.00.
contract
Give
PX toto
reason Section
with
collect for Jose.24
the Brian
your of P.D.
Baldomero
answer.
balance refused No. of the
to
valid, entire
Edemand
may allas that
be availed
Juana may
of ofby the
recover
Ato as unpaid
a the partial
is the telephone
value of
proper,
Validity
option
SUGGESTED
bar
bring
Decide an the
given,
each two
(2000)
ANSWER:
action defense debts
thus
for is must
such
damageswiththere sale be
reasons. isliquidated
valid?
against no perfected
Why?
those and who the
The
no
period name
fourth
compensation
requisites
property
assignment. of
have of Remedies
student
has
set aThe been
beenshallbyis
valid sent
theunder
correct.
take
contract
removed.
milling court the
His
him
place
contract
Ifto areexplicit
liability
prior when
arrives, to
absent.
squatters is
the
imposes only
two
the In
obligation;
P100,000
to
957,
cannot pay R.A. the that
substituteb)
No. a hernew
increased
6552 husband
Jose valid rate
otherwise
in obligation;
his lost?and
stead Reason.
an
known c) action
without as (5%) thefor
the bills, but the latter is willing pay only one
(5%)
The
what
demandable.
contract
(b)
(2%)
caused unlawful
Assuming
SUGGESTED he or wonof detainer
from
The
option
that
employed
ANSWER: case
it ZY
is Eva action
will
for the
for
the who not
lack
same. willprosper.
Pis10million
of not
entitled
Third, cause prosper.
Under
to
since of defense
her
covenant
joint, undivided
accident,
persons
obligation
anullable
are
reciprocal
not hence, but to
then
are
removed only
pro
contracts,
obligationsinterest
reconvey
we
reciprocally
to for
rata.
must
pay
within the all
on share
therein,
the
There land
distinguish
six creditor
becomes
the the is
months, of
plus
to E,
solidary
and
elements
parties. there
damages.
Remigio,
whether
demandable
the Thedebtor is of
sugarno
son
liability the of
a
capacity
unlawful
Realty
consent of
Installment
of the
detainerthe parties;was
telephone Buyer d) Protection
filed animus
against
company novandi
him. Act,can
(Art. Will orthe fourth
shall
1293, of it. Who is the correct? Why? (5%)
Extraordinary
Article
damages
(a)
buy
Juana This
obligation.
said 2014
had being
first
housethe of inflation
defense
Marvin the
still
and
right Civil
pending
lot,
to of
cannot or
her isY deflation
Code,is
she
share in
be no
court,
untenable.
entitled
inheld is
action
the defined
the
totoY is
the
property have be
still as In novation
of
onlyaddition,
SUGGESTED
price
each Redentor,
9Article
contract when
P100,000.00
central has
other. of
been
1197,
hasare she
the
ANSWER:
theIn
theupon
down obligation
can
obligation
paid
this
NCC).
present obligation ask
or son's
not.
connection,
except
payment for but
to partition
If it
that
shall
mill only
graduation
expressly has
it has
the
the be an so
beenor act
been
consent
sugar from
states
returned ofcane
paid, held or
of
intention
action
govern. prosper?to novate;
Under Why?
Section and (5%) e)3 The thereof, old andBernie the new is
ANOTHER
NCC).
the
liable
breached
rentals
by sharp
maintained
corporation
way as MAIN
Baldomero
solidary
of the
collected
ANSWER:
decrease
by
has the
as
contract.
inheritance, is,yet
debtor.
by intherefore,
winner
Manuel the
noThus, claim
The
she purchasing
for liable
the
which
creditor
he
before
can cannotshe
demand under
collection
may power
ispasseddueheld
be the
the ofof (b) thethe
that
one
by
of
Thethe
liberality
reconveyance
college.
when suit
the
of
the
obligation
In
for
the
vendorgranted
1981,
farmers lawto
damages
relation of her
contracting to
the
or
the
“toEnature
existing
while
paywas
alone.
undivided
land
should
vendee, parties
the
whenof
prosper
between interest
registered
Salvador the
was
latter
he likes”
abut inonly
obligationinthe
depositor
vitiated
havefiled
is a
the
theto
or
obligation
The
Nature
entitled:
contract. right ofof
1) should
first
Contracts;
to pay be
refusal incompatible
without wasRelativitynot
additional with
perfected of each
interestas a suspensive
Redentor
Loss
Nature of thedied condition
thing
of a year due; the
later
Contracts; fulfillment
Forceor in 1982. of In which
March is
the
b)
what
and Will
proceed
liable
the
partition peso. heyour
demandable
1998 for of It
againsthas
damages.
bar the does
answerwon
any
thing not
against
examinations? oneinbe
owned necessarily
athe
Stockton.
of thegame
Why?
in same
solidary
common, (3%)refer
of ifchance. to the second
Carlos
under name
requires
enable
and
one
ejectmenta
of
obligation of lot,
the
bank
them without
Remedies.
solidarity
buyer
is
suits
to has that
deliverno to
against prejudice
(Art.
of recover 1207,
creditor
capacity
their
the the
totoCC).
and
squatters,
sugar any
price
give The agreement
debtor, contract
paid.
consent.
cane but to x
in It x
the x
other
right
Contracts
the
Printado
However, on
for
unpaid all
the
is sincematerial
reason
(2002)
installments
engaged the that
inpoints
the
farmland theredue(Article
printing was within
was a1292).
conditional
business.
sold a The
grace
to an between ALTERNATIVE
subject
1983,
Majeure
Obligatoriness
Kristina
Roland, Remigioto
ain ANSWER:
(2000)
brought the
basketball sole
graduated
her
(1991) will
diamond
star, fromof
was the
ringcollege.
underto debtor
a In
jewelry
contract and,
exchange
paid
Although
SUGGESTED
debtors.
Article Marvin
494 Thepokerrate
ANSWER:
of demand
the mayofCivil
P10,000.00 the
depend
against
Code, peso as in
one
and todoes
ask the
consideration
part onthatnot dollar.
ability, the of
should
As
spite
sugar lease
a be
general
of them
central.
the the
noted rule,
decisions that
Asproblem
that a
toinbank lieu
Ben,
the
in his of
doesthe
has the
obligation
favor, not,
seller,
a payment
right
the in must
to any
of
squatters
mill of way,
bear
set theoff
two
acceptance
period promissoryof fourequivalent notes cannot
to a of stand
counter-offer together, 2. The suit will not prosper, since Juan's
Suplico
(a)
it isYes,
innocent
Whether
for
preclude
title that supplies
the
fundamentally
to the the
purchaser
or
option?
further not(4)
sale
remaining
printing
to there
demand the
a months
for
Explain. game other
value,paper
exists
propertyagainst
or
(2%)personto
then
an
chance.one
be the ismonth
Printado
Juana valid
extraordinary
others
declared
has as
so
for
as
therefore
no February
shop
for
the
the
of
still
sugarthe onefor
value
stipulate
loss
would on
deposits
cane, of the
1992,
cleaning.
year the
not Juana's
solidarity.
the
conditional
toRemigio
principle
in
leave.sugar
The
itsshare jewelry
play-for-play
hands
In of
central
August, inres
obligation
accidentallythe
for shop
perit
is
exclusively
first
the
1986,
a
found
undertook
lot
domino.
payment
debtor
isand
Salvador
void.
aHe
of the
forof
hence,
consisting
every
pursuant
2)
a If
sale
ALTERNATIVEthe year
with to
money period
ina an the
of order
paid
resolutory
ANSWER: of prescription
amount
installment agreement
by ZY of
condition todamages
PXpaid; of
under
was ten
because as
2) (10)
conjugal being
which if the wrongful
(Article
copy
Liability;
to return of theact
1182,the of NCC).
document
ring pocketing
Solidary
by so
February the
constituting entire
1, 1999." proceeds
RemediesWhen
cause
inflation
SUGGESTED
long as of theaction
or hers. deflation
ANSWER:
debt against
islapsed.
not the
is fully
for the buyer
paid. consistent
courts to decide. damages, with Lady
cannot
any Love,
be
indebtedness the
held Inc.
second
answerableHowever,
to lot itbe for
on even
reconveyed
damages
the before
part to
as the
her.
the
of a
exclusively
years
My
credited
contract has
answer on not the
is cancelled, yet
will purchase be the
toBernie price. same Therefore, as to the offered
farmers.
of the
SUGGESTED saleto In
return
of
ANSWER: assigning
the the
first P100,000.00
lot its
is not rightsa down
ground under for the
Suplico
2)
or
the
(b)No.
what
There The
community
established
The binds
mortgage
operates
second
being himself
no being
property,
as
rule
defense an
a suspensive
that
showing deliver
accessory
the
of Ythat is is
rights the
contract
wife entitled
ofofZY
condition
untenable.
the same
prescribed
an could to
Y isthe
for
innocent
purchasing with Extinguishment;
as the
Liability
the
Joey, said
basketball
loss of
depositor."
payment
contract,
Jovytrustee
the date
(1998)
to
and
the
season
car Hence,
the
of
arrived,
Jojo
was
sugar
the
vendee,
are
could
not land.
the
central
solidary
open,
imputable
compensation
on
In May
jewelry
the
will
he
ground
also
1994,
shop
debtorswas
to his
took under
offered
fault
transfer
that place
he orto
a
the loan.
perfection
compensation The novation
of the of the
contract loan, however,for did
the not expressly
construction (c) The
divesting obligation
him of his is
rights valid. as aIt is
co-owner subject of to
the a
refund
volume
sue
Eva
purchaser
still
power to
liable. of
of
recover
operates the
ofpaperforthe
The adid
itcash
value
chattel not
every
because
resolutory
peso result
surrender
month
must
themortgage
Article
had since
condition beforvalueisa there
117(7) for equal
period
respected
been only thewas
of
given
reducedof
the no
18to
and Condonation
Arturo
Remigio
informed
more
loan
fraud.
borrowed
obligation
In filed
Kristina
attractive
any a(2000)
case, case
ofpay P500,000.00
that against
P300,000.00
he the
plus
can Job Remedies
recover was
fringes from
which not
the
his forfather.
yet
benefits
has
value the
fallenof byY
DEVLAND
include the mortgage, on the hence, other hand
mortgage has
is the
extinguished right under to between
is
the unable
Taiwanese
suspensive the
to remove mutual
its P300,000.00,
condition, obligation
the obligations
squatters
i.e. to
the mill
on of the
the
future XJuan and
sugarand
by second lot. Indeed, such wrongdoing by
ANOTHER
of
valid the right MAIN
house of ANSWER:
ofthere
first Carlos.
refusal No
(Art. perfected
1475 & contract
1319,
50%
months,
FIRST
Family
buyer.
protected
as a
Article of
security
tremendously,
1296 the
ALTERNATIVE
Codewith total Printado
provides
ofnotwithstanding
the and
NCC. payments
ANSnot
The
WER:asin payment
that
could
contract turn
themade.
losses
be agreeing
fraud
no in
for gambling
employed
the
inflation to pay
debt that After
reconveyance
finished.
due.
Sweet heThe had
They
Taste, paid
creditor of
asked
Inc. the land
her
has,
Roland to to him.
return
however,
accepted his five father
Remedies, days
condoned
the died.
in
offer
cancel theto contract after 30consent.days from receipt the
bank. car
property.
cane
uncertain
does of
not from the
SSC
event the farmers.
refusedparty
of his whose
to This
accept
becoming negligence
will the amount
a money
lawyer. to
and
The a
Yes,
arises
NCC)
within
the
in
would
the sale
ALTERNATIVE
or betting
seller
case 60becausedays
in are
ofproperty
justify
the
ANSWER: other
securing
failure after
borne
the of person
lack
each
his
to increase
pay.
is valid.
exclusively Yof
a title.
delivery. However,
as (Eduarte theSuplico
by
a solidary
in the
theWith
vs.
buyer
amountloser-
co- CA, has the
253 When
her
of later.
and
Jojo's answer,
On theconstitute,
transferred
entire administrator
February averred
share to 6, infor
Sweetthat
1999,
the the of
the
Taste.benefit
debt. his
action
Kristina Lady
Since of
father's Juana,
already
went LoveJovy estate
to the
sues
has
acquired
by Bernie
withdrawal
the of notice subject of tocancellation.
resolutory DEVLAND is caused
demanded
novation
performance
any oftothe the of accident.
that
modes the
of this Salvador
contract If no
obligation
ofTasteacquiring price
executeby has
substituting
a
doesbalance
ownership been
deed paid
of
under the
be of the offer, there could betheno
ADDITIONAL
been faithfully ANSWER: delivering under the order SUGGESTED
requested
Extinguishment; ANSWER:payment Loss; of Impossiblethe of
spouse.
SCRA
maker
rental 391)isHence,
to not relieved
paid. conjugal Hence, of furtheror community
Brian liability
could funds
on
refuse to prescribed.
shop
become
Roland claim
and How
insolvent,
Sweetthe should
ring, the the
but for matter
she
creditor
breach was be decided?
informed
ofmakescontract. a
however
concurrence obliged of to
offer refund
and to thereafter
acceptance. at
Art. all,
absolute
debtor 712, thewith trial
sale
Civil a of court
third
Code. the acted
party.
property correctly
Under in its Article in
favor, 1293at of
agreement
maythe
pay notincreased for
be used torate. 10 months but
pay for such losses. If the P200,000.00.
Service
that
Defendants
demand the (1993)
same
on Joey
claimArturo
was to stolen
thatpay replied
the
the by Page
that
a
restriction
debt. thief 86
the who toof
same play 119 had
for
dismissing
which
the Civiltime the
Code,
it will complaint.
such
pay the substitution
balance ofcannot the price. take
stopped
money were doing so, because Printado has not
exclusive been
entered
Lady Love thealone shop is the void,night hence,before. Kristina filed
unenforceable,
made Incidentally,
effect without the the value consent of the of land the had
creditor. doubled The
an
as it action
by that time.
formers, who are creditors as far as the
obligation to mill their sugar cane is

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen