Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Email
Add to Favorites
Close X
Only Once
A first-time CEO writes about entrepreneurship and email. By Matt Blumberg of Return Path, Inc.
Lijit Search
powered by Lijit
Home
Books
Email
Entrepreneurship
Leadership
Marketing
Return Path
More
Boards
Business
Conferences
Culture
Current Affairs
Human Resources
Management
Music
New York
Sports
Strategy
Technology
Travel
Venture Capitalists
Weblogs
SEP 032009
Share
36 comments
Fred had a great post today called Ten Characteristics of Great Companies. This link includes
the comments, which numbered over 70 when I last looked. Great discussion overall, especially
for Fred’s having come up with the list on a 15-minute subway ride. Fred used to write a series
of posts about VC Chiches, and I would periodically write a Counter-Chiche post from the
entrepreneur’s perspective. This post inspired me to do the same.
So I’ve taken 15 minutes here, pretended I’m on the subway, and here is my list of Ten
Characteristics of Great Investors, in no particular order:
1. Great investors know how to give strategic advice without being in the operating
weeds of a company
2. Great investors get to know whole management teams, not just CEOs — in fact,
great investors become part of the extended management team of their portfolio
companies
3. Great investors invite you to do diligence on them by giving you a list of every CEO
they’ve ever worked with and asking you to pick the ones you want to talk to
4. Great investors ask great questions
5. Great investors don’t publicly take credit for the success of their investments, even if
they were major drivers of that success
6. Great investors show up for meetings on time and don’t spend the meeting using
their smartphone
7. Great investors treat their portfolio companies’ money as if it were their own money
when spending it on things like lawyers or travel
8. Great investors look for connections to make between their portfolio companies or
relevant people but have a strong relevance filter and don’t send junk
9. Great investors never have a ready-made list of the ways they add value to
companies — and they specifically never talk about the help they give in recruiting
executives or making sales/bus dev introductions
10. Great investors recognize when they have a conflict around a portfolio company and
are clear to represent their separate points of view separately
I’m not sure I’ll be invited to present this anywhere, but there it is for discussion.
Login
RSS Feed
Email Address
Subscribe
Email Address
Login to IntenseDebate
Or create an account
Username or Email:
Password:
Forgot login?
OpenID
Cancel Login
Close WordPress.com
Username or Email:
Password:
Lost your password?
Cancel Login
Close
Logged in as
1
Matt,
This is a terrific post and a must read for all of my peers. We talk all the time about how we can
become better a better investor and partner for our companies. I'll be sure to share this with my
partners. - Mark Solon, Highway 12 Ventures
no
Reply
These things make a popular and value added VC investor from the perspective of the CEO.
But a VC could be the best in the business at every single one and never make a dime.
A great VC has to do these things while sourcing great investments, knowing when to hold 'em,
fold'em, or double down, and getting great value for their own investors.
(and of course lots of great investors are not even active investors)
no
Reply
Great list. But I don't understand #9. I think investors do add value in this way - and isn't it helpful
to provide specific examples? Maybe I'm missing your point.
A very good list. I especially like #3. I have yet to meet investors doing that, but it would be great
if it happened.
I'd only add that investors who don't fit the above profile can also make great investors by being
silent investors!
Of course, everyone likes an investor who contributes productively, but there are times when
recognizing there are too many cooks in the kitchen and piggybacking on more qualified
investors is the best quality an investor can have.
no
Reply
4 replies · active 65 weeks ago
0 Vote up Vote down
This sounds more like it should be titled "Ten Characteristics of Investors Who Behave Like I
Wish They Would" - I see little or nothing here that would actually make an investor "Great" in a
financial sense. Seriously, showing up to meetings on time makes you great? I doubt even half
the top investors on the planet match this criteria.
no
Reply
2 replies · active 65 weeks ago
0 Vote up Vote down
Fun exercise. A thread that pulls most of these ten together might be, "a great investor is
personally invested." Or acts as if she or he is.
no
Reply
Matt-
At the very early stage of interacting with investors, I am starting to see why certain traits here
become important.
I'm currently hunting for a firsrt round angel investment and I'm wondering if your list would differ
from VC's to Angels?
Great list, keep it up!
no
Reply
1 reply · active 65 weeks ago
0 Vote up Vote down
Problem is that when you research 'value add' from a VC you struggle to find any impact.
Meanwhile how many of a VCs portfolio get this help - especially when they really need it but the
VC has written them off as living dead.
#3 is crucial - do your due diligence on the VC and don't forget to go beyond current portfolio -
there's a huge survivor bias otherwise.
no
Reply
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
0 Vote up Vote down
Nicely done!
I'd like to suggest an additional item for the list. Great investors have an intellectual, in addition to
capital, interest in the business.
no
Reply
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
0 Vote up Vote down
As others have noted, this is a list of "Characteristics of a great investor - for the company"
(rather than 'for their LPs'). That said, There's a crucial one I see missing. A great investor has
high tolerance for failure. That may mean standing by a founder who's doing a reasonable
amount of learning on the job, or standing by a company through a recap and a reset. While
portfolio returns may benefit from aggressive culling, it's usually in the company's interest to have
an investor who believes in second chances.
no
Reply
Matt on #1, an investor with relevant experience can be of great help in the weeds, but they have
to wear a very different hat, the key is to be able to switch hats back and forth (communicate)
and only go into the weeds with explicit permission. i find this analogy works on both private and
non-profit boards i work on.
no
Reply
1 reply · active 65 weeks ago
0 Vote up Vote down
Some of the VC people I deal with are pricks. They have far too much power, which reduces to
money, or access to it. This list is a good start. It should encourage entrepreneurs to boycott VCs
with bad reputations. The basics or benchmarks for me are: (1) Acknowledge your email as a
common courtesy; (2) Read what people send to you as a part of that courtesy, or post on your
web site that you don't accept unsolicited proposals; (3) Don't gate keep with return email
addresses for executive assistants. Be courteous enough to use your own email address; (4) if
you can't do those things, where do you get off presuming to extract surplus value from the
intellectual property of others, just because you either have money, or access to it.
no
Reply
1 reply · active 65 weeks ago
0 Vote up Vote down
Great post! It's my team's first go-round with a particular VC, and frankly, we have been getting
increasingly concerned the further along the investment process has gone. (Luckily, there is no
term sheet yet.)____Four areas in particular are concerning: First, the investor, who is not
technically proficient, is speaking with my CTO directly more than he is speaking with me, and
without my knowledge (Am I being paranoid?). Second, he has said he will get me a list of CEOs
of companies he has funded, but has hemmed and hawed on that. Third, he has somehow
decided that despite amazing partnerships already in place, and our product (and ability to start
having revenue) a day from launch, and our extremely conservative pro forma estimates, wants
to give us a valuation less than half of what we (very conservatively) believe it should be. And my
favorite he wants to rewrite our employment contracts to eliminate options, severance and
minimum terms. Boy, this has given us all a warm fuzzy feeling about him. Luckily, there isn't a
term sheet yet, and other investors are coming alog in their own diigence.
no
Reply
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
0 Vote up Vote down
I would add "a great investor is honest and willing to deal with the real issues". In my business, i
have seen too many investors who want to ignore a problem, hoping it goes away, then just
replace the CEO when the problem gets to big, hoping the new person will fix it
no
Reply
1 reply · active 65 weeks ago
0 Vote up Vote down
Nice list; From the other side..I would just add, great investors can empathize with management
teams, i.e. the constant battle with strategy, market forces, etc because great investors most
likely would have been great operators at some point. Being able to see through the eyes of
those you invest in can provide unique insight.
no
Reply
Fascinating! I've passed this along to some of my Private Equity friends. While this could
certainly be applicable to PE, it would be great to see a list that specifically addresses these
investors.
no
Reply
Hi, great post. Also confused by number 9. I think that value-add is immensely important for start-
ups, for example a VC who has experience of running similar businesses and can help shape the
direction to avoid pitfalls.
no
Reply
1 reply · active 25 weeks ago
Post a new comment
Enter text right here!
Login to IntenseDebate
Login to WordPress.com
Login to OpenID
Name
Email
Website (optional)
http://
OpenID URL
Submit Comment
None
Subscribe to
Comments by IntenseDebate
http://
None
My name is Matt Blumberg. I am a technology and marketing entrepreneur in New York City. I started a company
called Return Path back in ... About Me
Email Me
@mattblumberg
Tag Cloud:
Amazon Andy Sernovitz AOL Authentic Response Bill McCloskey Blink Built to Last CAN SPAM
ClickZ DMNews ECOA Facebook FeedBurner Gmail Goodmail Good to Great
Google Hotmail Jim Collins Malcolm Gladwell Mediapost Microsoft
Hackoff.com
MovieFone MSN New Media Deal New York Times NYC Lean Startup Meetup OnlyOnce Patrick
Lencioni Postmaster Direct Seth Godin Skype Spin Selling Starbucks Techstars The Tipping Point
TRUSTe Union Square Ventures Verizon Vonage Wall Street Journal Wikipedia Yahoo Zappos
Popular Posts
What Does a CEO Do, Anyway?
Why CEOs Shouldn’t Mess with Engineers
Investment in the Email Ecosystem
I Love My Job
How to Negotiate a Term Sheet with a VC, Part IV
Blogs I Follow:
A VC
Andrew Winston
Andy Sernovitz's Damn, I Wish I'd Thought of That!
Ask The VC
BeRelevant!
Brad Feld – Colorado VC
BuzzMachine
ClickZ News Blog
Continuations
David Allen – Productivity
Deliverability.com
DM News
DMNews E-Mail Marketing News Feed
Email Marketing Insights
Email Marketing Strategy from Silverpop CEO Bill Nussey
Foundry Group
Gotham Gal
Internet and e-mail policy and practice
IT Email Infrastructure
MailChimp Blog
Maximizing Deliverability
Multi-Channel Messaging
Return Path Email Marketing Water Cooler
School of Hard Knocks
Seth Godin – guru
Slice of Lime Blog
The Email Wars
The Spam Weblog
This is going to be BIG.
Union Square Ventures: A New York Venture Capital Fund Focused on Early Stage & Startup Investing
VerticalResponse Email Marketing Blog for Small Business
Word to the Wise
View All
Only Once
© 2004 - 2010 Matt Blumberg
Home
About
Archives
Categories
Blogroll
twitter
facebook
linkedin