Table 2.2.3.

2 Project Synopsis/Proposal Evaluation

Parameters Allocated High Medium Low

Marks 9 – 15 Marks 5 – 8 Marks 0 – 4 Marks
Identification of Detailed and Average Minimal
Problem Domain extensive explanation of the explanation of the
explanation of the purpose and need purpose and need of
and Detailed 15 purpose and need of of the project; the project
Analysis the project
Study of the Detailed and Moderate study Minimal
Existing Systems extensive of the Existing explanation ofthe
and Feasibility 15 explanation of systems; specifications
of Project the Collects some and the
Proposal specifications basic Limitations of
and the information the existing
limitations of the Systems
existing systems incomplete
information
Objectives and All objectives of Average Objectives of the
Methodology of the proposed justification to proposed work
the Proposed 10 work are well the objectives are either not
Work defined; Steps to proposed; Steps identified or not
be followed to are mentioned well defined;
solve the defined but unclear; Incomplete and
problem are without improper
clearly specified justification to specification
objectives
8 – 10 Marks 5– 8 Marks 0 – 5 Marks

Table 2.2.3.3 Mid-Term Project Evaluation

Parameters Allocated High Medium Low

Marks 9 – 15 Marks 5 – 8 Marks 0 – 4 Marks
Division of Division of Modular
problem into problem into approach not
modules and modules but adopted, design
Design 15 good selection of inappropriate methodology not
Methodology computing selection of defined
framework, computing
appropriate framework,
design design
methodology methodology not
 defined
Time frame Time frame Time frame
Planning of 15 work properly work properly work not
Project Work specified and specified but not properly
being followed being followed specified
All objectives of Average Objectives of the
the proposed justification to proposed work
work are well the objects are either not
Demonstration & 10 defined; Steps to proposed; Steps identified or not
Presentation be followed to are mentioned well defined;
solve the defined but unclear; incomplete and
problem are without improper
clearly specified justification to specification
objectives
8 – 10 Marks 5– 8 Marks 0 – 5 Marks

Table 2.2.3.4 End Semester Project Evaluation

Parameters Allocated High Medium Low

Marks 9 – 15 Marks 5 – 8 Marks 0 – 4 Marks
Changes are Moderate Suggestions
made as per changes are during midterm
modifications made as per evaluation are
Incorporation of 15 suggested during modification not incorporated
suggestions midterm suggested during
evaluation and midterm
new innovations evaluation
added
All defined Some of the Defined
objectives are defined objectives not
achieved, all objectives are achieved,
Project 15 modules achieved, all modules are not
Demonstration working well modules in proper
and integrated, working well working form
project properly and modules are that further leads
demonstrated not properly to failure of
integrated integrated
system
Contents of Contents of Contents of
presentation are presentation are presentation are
appropriate and appropriate but not appropriate
well delivered. not well and not well
Presentation 10 Proper eye delivered. Eye delivered. Poor
contact with contact with few delivery of
audience and people and presentation
clear voice with unclear voice
good language

8 – 10 Marks 5– 8 Marks 0 – 5 Marks