Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 1 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
435
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 2 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
436
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 3 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
437
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 4 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
FELICIANO, J.:
„Transaction Tax
Interest payments on
money market
borrowings.......................... P45,771,849.00
35% Transaction tax due
thereon.................................. 16,020,147.00
Add: 25% 4,005,036.75
surcharge..........................
Total.............................................. P20,025,183.75
Add:
14% int. fr.
1-20-78 to
7-31-80........ P
7,093,302.57
20% int. fr.
8-1-80 to
3-31- 10,675,523.58
83...........
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 5 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
17,768,826.15
P37,794,009.90
438
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 6 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
439
P91,406,194.00
Net income per P91,664,360.00
investigation.........................................
Income tax due 34,734,559.00
thereon....................................................
Less: Tax already assessed per 80,358.00
return......................................
Deficiency........................................................................ P34,654,201.00
Add:
14% int. fr.
4-15-78 to
7-31-81.................... P11,128,503.56
20% int. fr.
8-1-80 to
4-15-81........................ 4,886,242.34
P16,014,745.90
1
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE AND COLLECTIBLE P50,668,946.90‰
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 7 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
_________________
1As quoted in the decision of CTA, CTA Case No. 3843, Rollo of G.R.
Nos. 106949-50, pp. 55-56. Hereafter, unless otherwise indicated, the
Rollo of G.R. Nos. 106949-50 is cited simply as „Rollo.‰
440
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 8 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
No pronouncement as to costs.
SO ORDERED.‰
Picop and the CIR once more filed separate Petitions for
Review before the Supreme Court. These cases were
consolidated and, on 23 August 1993, the Court resolved to
give due course to both Petitions in G.R. Nos. 106949-50
and 106984-85 and required the parties to file their
Memoranda.
_________________
2Id., p. 80.
441
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 9 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
The CIR also claims that Picop should be held liable for
interest at fourteen percent (14%) per annum from 15 April
1978 for three (3) years, and interest at twenty percent
(20%) per annum for a maximum of three (3) years; and for
a surcharge often percent (10%), on PicopÊs deficiency
income tax. Finally, the CIR contends that Picop is liable
for the corporate development tax equivalent to five
percent (5%) of its correct 1977 net income.
The issues which we must here address may be sorted
out and grouped in the following manner:
______________
442
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 10 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
III. (1) Whether Picop had understated its sales and overstated
its cost of sales for 1977; and
I.
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 11 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
443
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 12 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
444
a period not exceeding one year shall be paid upon accrual payment,
whichever is earlier.Ê ‰ (Italics supplied)
(1) One hundred per cent (100%) for the first five years;
(2) Seventy-five per cent (75%) for the sixth through the eighth
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 13 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
years;
(3) Fifty per cent (50%) for the ninth and tenth years;
(4) Twenty per cent (20%) for the eleventh and twelfth years;
and
(5) Ten per cent (10%) for the thirteenth through the fifteenth
year.
4
xxx xxx x x x‰
_____________
445
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 14 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
____________
identical terms, as Section 210 (b) of the 1977 Tax Code, by virtue of P.D. No. 1158 also
446
is made to pay the tax, actually, the tax is on the interest earning of the
immediate and all prior lenders/placers of the money. x x x.Ê ‰ (Rollo, pp.
36-37)
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 15 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
_____________
447
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 16 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
_____________
10 Sections 53 and 54, 1977 Tax Code; Sections 51 and 251, current NIRC;
and see Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Procter and Gamble Philippines
Manufacturing Corporation, 204 SCRA 377, 384-385 (1991).
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 17 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
448
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 18 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
_____________
11 Annex „A‰ of PicopÊs Petition for Review before the CTA, CTA Case
No. 3843, Records, pp. 7-8.
449
______________
12 In Perez v. Court of Appeals, 127 SCRA 636 (1984), the Court said:
„There is another aspect to this case. What is involved here is a money market
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 19 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
450
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 20 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
_____________
451
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 21 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
____________
452
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 22 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
453
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 23 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
„Sec. 72. Surcharges for failure to render returns and for rendering
false and fraudulent returns.·In case of willful neglect to file the
return or list requiredby this Title within the time prescribed by law,
or in case a false or fraudulent return or list is wilfully made, the
Commissioner of Internal Revenue shall add to the tax or to the
deficiency tax, in case any payment has been made on the basis of
such return before the discovery of the falsity or fraud, as surcharge
of fifty per centum of the amount of such tax or deficiency tax. In
case of any failure to make and file a return or list within the time
prescribed by law or by the Commissioner or other Internal
Revenue Officer, not due to willful neglect, the Commissioner of
Internal Revenue shall add to the tax twenty-five per centum of its
amount, except that, when a return is voluntarily and without
notice from the Commissioner or other officer filed after such time,
and it is shown that the failure to file it was due to a reasonable
cause, no such addition shall be made to the tax. The amount so
added to any tax shall be collected at the same time, in the same
manner and as part of the tax unless the tax has been paid before
the discovery of the neglect, falsity, or fraud, in which case the
amount so added shall be collected in the same manner as the tax.‰
(Emphases supplied)
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 24 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
454
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 25 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
455
„Title X
Chapter I
(c) the penalties imposed hereunder shall form part of the tax
and the entire amount shall be subject to the interest prescribed in
Section 249.
Section 249. Interest.·(a)In General.·There shall be assessed
and collected on any unpaid amount of tax, interest at the rate of
twenty percent (20%) per annum or such higher rate as may be
prescribed by regulations, from the date prescribed for payment
until the amount is fully paid. x x x.‰ (Emphases supplied)
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 26 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
_____________
16 Section 247 (a) was inserted by P.D. No. 1994 dated 5 November
1985. (Originally appearing as Section 281 (a), it assumed its
456
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 27 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
_____________
present position pursuant to E.O. No. 273 dated 25 July 1987 which
rearranged the Tax Code.) The applicable general principle is that tax
laws are to be given only prospective application, in the absence of an
explicit statutory command, that a particular provision be applied
retroactively. (See, e.g., Vitug, Compendium of Tax Law and
Jurisprudence, p. 35 [3rd rev. ed., 1993]).
17 The CIR here relied on Section 7, R.A. No. 5186 as amended which,
in its opening clause, reads:
(Emphases supplied)
and on Section 1, Rule 13, of the „Revised Rules and Regulations to
Implement the Intent and Provisions of R.A. No. 5186, as amended,‰
which reads:
457
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 28 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
______________
„Rule XIII
458
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 29 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
459
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 30 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
Appeals
II
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 31 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
460
_____________
20 Section 30 (b)(l) of the 1977 Tax Code is now Section 29 (b)(l) of the
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 32 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
461
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 33 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
_____________
462
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 34 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
___________
463
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 35 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
____________
464
We conclude that the CTA and the Court of Appeals did not
err in allowing the deductions of PicopÊs 1977 interest
payments on its loans for capital equipment against its
gross income for 1977.
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 36 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
_____________
465
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 37 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
_____________
1982, to the CIR, concerning PicopÊs 1977 Income Tax, set down PicopÊs total
claim for deduction of losses in the following terms:
The item „Carry forward in 1975 loss‰ appears to refer to operating loss
previously incurred by Picop and is not really in dispute in the instant case. In
the subsequent pages, therefore, we deal only with the propriety of the
deduction of P44,196,106.00 of accumulated losses incurred by RPPM prior to
merger effective date.
25 Note 12 of the Audited Financial Statements of Picop for the years ended
31 December 1978 and 1977; Records of CTA Case No. 3843, p. 84.
466
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 38 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
„2) PICOP will not be allowed to carry over the losses of Rustan
prior to the legal dissolution of the latter because at that
time the two (2) companies still had separate legal
personalities;
3) After BOI approval of the merger, PICOP can no longer
apply for the registration of the registered capacity of
Rustan because with the approved merger, such registered
capacity of Rustan transferred to PICOP will have the same
registration date as that of Rustan. In this case, the
previous losses of Rustan may be carried over by PICOP,
because with the merger, PICOP assumes all the rights and
obligations of Rustan subject, however, to the period
26
prescribed for carrying over of such losses.‰ (Italics
supplied)
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 39 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
____________
26 Rollo, p. 36.
467
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 40 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
28
29.11a, p. 103]. Furthermore, once the BOI approved the merger
agreement, the registered capacity
_____________
27 The CIR failed to explain the second ground and, so far as we have been
able to determine, the record furnishes no indication as to why or on what basis
the CIR took this view. The CIR may have been trying to distinguish between
losses arising from operations (e.g., manufacturing, marketing, etc.) as
distinguished from losses resulting from payment of amortizations on loans
obtained from third parties; operating revenues being offset or wiped out by
interest expense and payments on principals of loans. This, however, can only
be speculated upon.
28 Here the CTA appeared to be arguing against itself.
468
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 41 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
____________
29 Rollo, p. 38.
30 Memorandum for petitioner Picop in CTA Case No. 3843, p. 12;
Record of CTA Case No. 3843.
31 Court of Appeals Decision, p. 12; Rollo, p. 39.
469
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 42 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
_____________
32 Note that the 1977 Tax Code allows a net capital loss carryover to
the succeeding taxable year, for a taxpayer „other than a corporation‰;
Section 34 (d).
The corresponding provisions in the current Tax Code are Section 29
(d)(1) and (2) and Section 33 (d).
470
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 43 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
interests, taxes, or other charges, he can not deduct them from the
income of the next or any succeeding year. x x x
xxx xxx xxx
x x x. If subsequent to its occurrence, however, a taxpayer first
ascertains the amount of a loss sustained during a prior taxable
year which has not been deducted from gross income, he may render
an amended return for such preceding taxable year including such
amount of loss in the deduction from gross income and may in
proper cases file aclaim for refund of the excess paid by reason of the
failure to deduct such loss in the original return. A loss from theft or
embezzlement occurring in one year and discovered in another is
ordinarily deductible for the year in which sustained.‰ (Emphases
supplied)
It is thus clear that under our law, and outside the special
realm of BOI-registered enterprises, there is no such thing
as a carryover of net operating loss. To the contrary, losses
must be deducted against current income in the taxable
year when such losses were incurred. Moreover, such losses
may be charged off only against income earned in the same
taxable year when the losses were incurred.
Thus it is that R.A. No. 5186 introduced the carry-over
of net operating losses as a very special incentive to be
granted only to registered pioneer enterprises and only
with respect to their registered operations. The statutory
purpose here may be seen to be the encouragement of the
establishment and continued operation of pioneer
industries by allowing the registered enterprise to
accumulate its operating losses which may be expected
during the early years of the enterprise and to permit the
enterprise to offset such losses against income earned by it
in later years after successful establishment and regular
operations. To promote its economic development goals, the
Republic foregoes or defers taxing the income of the pioneer
enterprise until after that
471
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 44 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 45 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
472
____________
33 See USCA, Title 26, §172; U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986. In
the United States although the U.S. Internal Revenue Code expressly
provides for loss carry-overs and loss carry-backs for business
corporations generally, federal courts have looked well beyond simple
corporate formalities in determining the deductibility by one corporation
of losses accumulated by another (merged) corporation. In this
connection, it is instructive to consider Libson Shops, Incorporated v.
Koehler, 353 U.S. 382, 1 L. Ed. 2nd 924 (1957), affirming 229 F. 2nd 220
(CA 8th, 1956). The summary in Mertens, Law of Federal Taxation, Vol.
5, Section 29.11 c, pp. 124-125, is helpful:
„The District Court and the Court of Appeals denied such carry-over of the pre-
merger losses against post-merger profits, on the ground that the corporation,
surviving the merger was not the same ÂtaxpayerÊ as the corporations which
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 46 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
had sustained the losses. The Supreme Court affirmed the holding of the lower
courts, and likewise said that the controversy centered on the meaning of Âthe
taxpayer,Ê and that ÂThe contentions of the parties require us to decide whether
it can be said that petitioner, a combination of 16 sales businesses, is „the
taxpayer‰ having the pre-merger losses of three of those businesses.Ê In
deciding this
473
______________
„x x x The decision of the Supreme Court in the Libson Shops case has made it
clear that where a net operating loss is sustained by a corporation prior to its
merger with another corporation and the business of the loss corporation
becomes a unit of the business conducted by the surviving corporation, such
premerger losses may not be used to offset the income of other units of the
surviving corporation which prior to the merger were operated by the other
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 47 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
corporation because the income against which the offset is made was not
produced by substantially the same business which incurred the losses. And
such rule has been applied even though the corporation which sustained the
losses is the corporation surviving the merger. x x x‰ (Citations omitted; italics
supplied)
Libson Shops has been followed in numerous other U.S. cases collected
in id., pp. 124 et seq.
474
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 48 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
____________
475
„The mere testimony of a witness for PICOP and the cash vouchers
do not suffice to establish its claim that registration fees were paid
to the Register of Deeds for the registration of real estate and
chattel mortgages in favor of Development Bank of the Philippines
and the Philippine National Bank as guarantors of PICOPÊs loans.
The witness could very well have been merely repeating what he
was instructed to say regardless of the truth, while the cash
vouchers, which we do not find on file, are not said to provide the
necessary details regarding the nature and purpose of the expenses
reflected therein. PICOP should have presented, through the
guarantors, its ownerÊs copy of the registered titles with the lien
inscribed thereon as well as an official receipt from the Register of
35
Deeds evidencing payment of the registration fee.‰ (Italics supplied)
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 49 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
____________
476
III
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 50 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
______________
477
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 51 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
478
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 52 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
(b) the exchange rate at the time the proceeds were actually
received. It was this rate at time of receipt of the proceeds that
determined the amount of pesos credited by the Central Bank
(through the agent banks) in favor of PICOP. These accumulated
differences were averaged by the external auditors and this was
what was used at the year-end for income tax and other
40
government-report purposes. (T.s.n., Oct. 17/85, pp. 20-25)‰
_____________
479
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 53 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
_____________
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 54 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
480
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 55 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
P2,434,367.75.
Recapitulating, we hold:
____________
481
482
44
Income Tax Due Thereon . . . . . P17,030,574.00
Less:
Tax Already Assessed per
Return. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80,358.00
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 57 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
Add:
Five percent (5%) Corporate
Development Tax. . . . . . . . . . P 2,434,367.00
Total Deficiency Income Tax. . . . P18,994,583.00
Add:
45
Five percent (5%) surcharge . . . P 949,729.15
Add:
Fourteen percent (14%)
interest from 15 April
46
1978 to 14 April 1981 . . . . . . P 8,376,610.80
_________________
483
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 58 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
No pronouncement as to costs.
SO ORDERED.
_______________
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 59 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
Appeals also failed to impose the penalty interest due under section 51
(d) and imposed only the penalty interest due under Section 51 (e)(2).
This is corrected now in the computation above.
484
VITUG, J.:
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 60 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
transaction tax.
There was, to be sure, a 35% transaction tax still in
effect in 1977 but it was a tax not on the investor-lender in
whose favor the interest income on the commercial paper
accrues. The tax was, instead, levied on the borrower-issuer
of commercial papers transacted in the primary market.
Being the principal taxpayer, the borrower-issuer could not
have been likewise contemplated to be a mere tax
withholding agent. The tax was conceived as a tax on
business transaction, and so it was rightly incorporated in
Title V, entitled „Privilege Taxes on Business and
Occupation‰ of the Tax Code.
485
··o0o··
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 61 of 62
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 250 15/02/2020, 10(47 AM
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000017046b5fd8c0d576863003600fb002c009e/p/APG053/?username=Guest Page 62 of 62